Fire retardant

Last updated
Fire retardant dispersed aerially onto brush adjoining a firebreak to contain the Tumbleweed Fire in California, in July 2021 Tumbleweed Fire, Los Angeles County 2021, Part 9.JPG
Fire retardant dispersed aerially onto brush adjoining a firebreak to contain the Tumbleweed Fire in California, in July 2021

A fire retardant is a substance that is used to slow down or stop the spread of fire or reduce its intensity. This is commonly accomplished by chemical reactions that reduce the flammability of fuels or delay their combustion. [1] [2] Fire retardants may also cool the fuel through physical action or endothermic chemical reactions. Fire retardants are available as powder, to be mixed with water, as fire-fighting foams and fire-retardant gels.

Contents

Fire retardants are commonly used in fire fighting, where they may be applied aerially or from the ground.

Principles of operation

In general, fire retardants reduce the flammability of materials by either blocking the fire physically or by initiating a chemical reaction that stops the fire.

Physical action

There are several ways in which the combustion process can be retarded by physical action:

Commonly used fire retardant additives include mixtures of huntite (Mg3Ca(CO3)4) and hydromagnesite (Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2·4H2O), aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)3), and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2). When heated, aluminium hydroxide dehydrates to form aluminum oxide (alumina, Al2O3, releasing water vapor in the process. This reaction absorbs a great deal of heat, cooling the material into which it is incorporated. Additionally, alumina residue forms a protective layer on the material's surface. Mixtures of huntite and hydromagnesite work in a similar manner. They endothermically decompose releasing both water and carbon dioxide, [3] [4] giving fire retardant properties [5] [6] [7] to the materials in which they are incorporated.

Chemical action

Uses

Portable fire extinguisher FireExtinguisherABC.jpg
Portable fire extinguisher

Fire extinguishers

Class A foam is used as a fire retardant in 2.5 gallon [APW] and [CAFS] extinguishers to contain incipient brush fires and grass fires by creating a fire break. Other chemical retardants are capable of rendering class A material and Class B fuels non-flammable and extinguishing class A, class B, and some class D fires.[ citation needed ] Fire retardant slurries dropped from aircraft are normally applied ahead of a wildfire to prevent ignition, while fire suppression agents are used to extinguish fires.

Surface coating

Objects may be coated with fire retardants. For example, Christmas trees are sprayed with retardants, as a tree dries out it becomes very flammable and a fire-hazard.

Steel structures have a fire retardant coating around columns and beams to prevent structural elements from weakening during a fire.

Dormitories in the US are considering or are required by law to use these products. Intumescent coatings are used by various dormitories and in school buildings, especially those with historic structures that lack fire sprinkler systems. [10]

Forest-fire fighting

A MAFFS-equipped Air National Guard C-130 Hercules drops fire retardant on wildfires in Southern California Hercules C130 bombardier d eau Californie.jpg
A MAFFS-equipped Air National Guard C-130 Hercules drops fire retardant on wildfires in Southern California
Red-dyed line of fire retardant stands out clearly on this Arizona hill, to control the Alambre Fire Phos-check line.jpg
Red-dyed line of fire retardant stands out clearly on this Arizona hill, to control the Alambre Fire

Early fire retardants were mixtures of water and thickening agents, and later included borates [11] and ammonium phosphates.[ citation needed ]

Generally, fire retardants are dropped from aircraft or applied by ground crews around a wildfire's edges in an effort to contain its spread. This allows ground crews time to work to extinguish the fire. However, when needed, retardant can also be dropped directly onto flames to cool the fire and reduce flame length. [12]

Aerial firefighting

Aerial firefighting is a method to combat wildfires using aircraft. The types of aircraft used include fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters. Smokejumpers and rappellers are also classified as aerial firefighters, being delivered by parachute from a variety of fixed-wing aircraft, or rappelling from helicopters. Chemicals used to fight fires may include water, water enhancers, or specially-formulated fire retardants. [13]

Textiles

Materials

Wildfire retardants

Fire retardants applied to wildfires are usually a mixture of water and chemicals designed to wet the area as well as chemically retard a fire's progression through vegetation. Typically it is colored [14] so that the application area can be seen from the air. Fire retardant gel based retardants which meet NFPA Standard 1150 are also being used in service. These are dyed other colors to differentiate them from the traditional red retardant. The gels and their dyes are designed to biodegrade naturally. [15]

A Phos-Chek tank trailer at Ramona Airport Phos-Chek Tank.JPG
A Phos-Chek tank trailer at Ramona Airport

Any fire retardant approved for use against wildfires on US Federal lands must be included on the United States Forest Service Qualified Products List. [16] To be added to that list, the product must be tested by Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, a division of the National Technology and Development Program. This process can take up to two years. [17] Phos-Chek is a brand of long-term retardant currently approved for wildland fire use. [18]

Researchers at the University of Southern California’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering published a report titled “Metals in Wildfire Suppressants.” The report provides the first-ever chemical analysis of Phos-Chek fire retardant, which the research team studied because it is the most widely used. The USC researchers found that Phos-Chek contains high levels of heavy metals: 14,400 μg/l of cadmium, 72,700 μg/l of chromium, and 119,000 μg/l of vanadium. These numbers exceed California toxic waste limits by 14 times, 14 times, and five times, respectively.

Phos-Chek also has a consumer-based fire retardant spray called Wildfire Home Defense that is effective immediately after application and that remains effective until it is washed off with heavy water levels. It is designed to be applied to fuel beds around homes and outbuildings to create a firebreak in the fuels leading up to each structure. [19] Ember Bloc is another consumer-based fire retardant gel that can be applied to the exterior of one's house and nearby structures to help protect against both embers and flames in a wildfire. It has a unique ability to cling onto the side of a house to withstand high heat and windy conditions. [20]

Environmental concerns

Forest fire retardants that are used are generally considered non-toxic, [21] but even less-toxic compounds carry some risk when organisms are exposed to large amounts. [22] As of 2008, drops within 300 feet of bodies of water are generally discouraged unless lives or property are directly threatened. [23] The US Forest Service is the governing agency that conducts research and monitors the effect of fire retardants on wildland systems in the US. [24] [25]

Potential risk and health concerns

Some specialized indoor fire retardants are organic halides (haloalkanes) such as Halon and PhostrEx, which are proven to be toxic.

Studies have also shown that a drop of the retardant chemical directly into a stream may cause a sufficient ammonia concentration in the water, which is lethal to fish and other aquatic organisms. [26]

Another notable health concern is that fire-suppressant foams are especially toxic to fish in standardized soft and hard water, possibly due to surfactants. [27]

See also

References

  1. "BLM Wyoming Wildland Fire Glossary". Blm.gov. 2008-06-18. Archived from the original on 2014-05-08. Retrieved 2012-08-04.
  2. Coford Glossary "Fire Retardant" Archived February 8, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  3. Hollingbery, LA; Hull TR (2010). "The Thermal Decomposition of Huntite and Hydromagnesite - A Review". Thermochimica Acta. 509 (1–2): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2010.06.012.
  4. Hollingbery, LA; Hull TR (2012). "The Thermal Decomposition of Natural Mixtures of Huntite and Hydromagnesite". Thermochimica Acta. 528: 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2011.11.002.
  5. Hollingbery, LA; Hull TR (2010). "The Fire Retardant Behaviour of Huntite and Hydromagnesite - A Review". Polymer Degradation and Stability. 95 (12): 2213–2225. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.08.019.
  6. Hollingbery, LA; Hull TR (2012). "The Fire Retardant Effects of Huntite in Natural Mixtures with Hydromagnesite". Polymer Degradation and Stability. 97 (4): 504–512. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.024.
  7. Hull, TR; Witkowski A; Hollingbery LA (2011). "Fire Retardant Action of Mineral Fillers". Polymer Degradation and Stability. 96 (8): 1462–1469. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.006. S2CID   96208830.
  8. "PHOS-CHeK D75 Fire Retardants" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-15. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  9. "How do flame retardants work?". European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) and European Flame Retardants Association (EFRA). Retrieved 12 Feb 2010.
  10. Amy Farnsworth (2007-08-06). "New coatings cut risk of a dorm fire". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on August 24, 2007.
  11. US 2858895,Connell, George A. (inventor),"Methods and compositions for controlling fires",published November 4, 1958.
  12. "Interagency Standards for Fire and Aviation Operations 2007, Chapter 17" (PDF). National Interagency Fire Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2007-08-31.
  13. "USDA Forest Service Wildland Fire Chemicals" . Retrieved 2008-11-13.
  14. US 6676858,Vandersall, Howard L.&Kegeler, Gary H.,"Colorant liquid, method of use, and wildfire retardant liquids containing the same",published January 13, 2004.
  15. "New fire retardant gel developed that can remain effective for months". 4 October 2019. Retrieved 2020-10-05.
  16. Qualified Products List
  17. "Long-Term Fire Retardants – National Technology and Development Program – USDA Forest Service". www.fs.fed.us. Retrieved 2022-01-06.
  18. "Wildland Fire Chemical Product Information" . Retrieved 2008-11-13.
  19. "Phos-Chek Wildfire Home Defense FAQs" . Retrieved 2019-09-13.
  20. "Ember bloc fire gel fact sheet / Technical specs" . Retrieved 2020-10-05.
  21. Perimeter Solutions (November 16, 2022). "Phos-Chek LC95A, Phos-Chek LC95A-MV Safety Data Sheet" (PDF). Perimeter Solutions. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved May 11, 2025.
  22. Bell, Tina; Tolhurst, Kevin; Wouters, Michael (16 May 2005). "Bell, T., Tolhurst, K., and Wouters, M. Effects of the fire retardant Phos-Chek on vegetation in eastern Australian heathlands. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 14(2) 199–211" . International Journal of Wildland Fire. 14 (2): 199–211. doi:10.1071/WF04024. S2CID   129368588.
  23. William Yardley (November 15, 2008). "In Fighting Wildfires, Concerns About Chemicals". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
  24. "USDA Forest Service Wildland Fire Chemical Systems" . Retrieved 2008-11-13.
  25. "Wildland Fire Chemical Products Toxicity and Environmental Concerns" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-11-13.
  26. Dietrich, Joseph P.; Myers, Mark S.; Strickland, Stacy A.; Van Gaest, Ahna; Arkoosh, Mary R. (January 2013). "Toxicity of forest fire retardant chemicals to stream-type chinook salmon undergoing parr-smolt transformation". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 32 (1): 236–247. doi: 10.1002/etc.2052 . ISSN   1552-8618. PMID   23161484. S2CID   5240730.
  27. Gaikowski, M. P.; Hamilton, S. J.; Buhl, K. J.; McDonald, S. F.; Summers, C. H. (August 1996). "Acute toxicity of firefighting chemical formulations to four life stages of fathead minnow". Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 34 (3): 252–263. doi:10.1006/eesa.1996.0070. ISSN   0147-6513. PMID   8812194.