Euhelopus

Last updated

Euhelopus
Temporal range: Berriasian-Valanginian
~145–133  Ma
Euhelopus in Japan.jpg
Reconstructed skeleton in Japan
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade:† Sauropodomorpha
Clade:† Sauropoda
Clade:† Macronaria
Clade:† Titanosauriformes
Clade:† Somphospondyli
Family:† Euhelopodidae
Genus:† Euhelopus
Romer, 1956
Type species
†Euhelopus zdanskyi
(Wiman, 1929)
Synonyms

Euhelopus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur that lived between 145 and 133 million years ago during the Berriasian and Valanginian stages of the Early Cretaceous [1] in what is now Shandong Province in China. It was a large quadrupedal herbivore. Like sauropods such as brachiosaurs and titanosaurs, Euhelopus had longer forelegs than hind legs. This discovery was paleontologically significant because it represented the first dinosaur scientifically investigated from China: seen in 1913, rediscovered in 1922, and excavated in 1923 and studied by T'an during the same year. [2] Unlike most sauropod specimens, it has a relatively complete skull. [3]

Contents

Euhelopus was a long-necked sauropod similar to Mamenchisaurus , but its affinities are controversial. Most studies favor a close relationship between Euhelopus and titanosaurs, rather than mamenchisaurids.

Description

Size comparison Euhelopus Scale.svg
Size comparison

Size

Since its original description, Euhelopus has often been considered a rather large sauropod. It has been thought to weigh about 15–20 tonnes (17–22 tons) and attain an adult length of 15 metres (49 feet). [4] Later estimates have downsized this considerably. In 2016, Gregory S. Paul estimated the weight at 3.5 tonnes (3.9 tons) and the body length at 11 metres (36 feet). [5] Benson et al. estimated its mass as 5,924 kg. [6] Larramendi et al. later estimated its mass as 3,628 kg. [7]

Overall anatomy

Euhelopus was a relatively long-necked sauropod, with a 4-meter neck [8] composed of 17 cervical vertebrae. [lower-alpha 1] The presacral vertebrae had a camellate pneumatic structure, made of many small pneumatic chambers, as is characteristic of titanosauriforms and some mamenchisaurids. [1] [9] Pneumatic chambers even extended into the ilium, [1] as occurs in many titanosaurs. [10] The humerus was apparently nearly as long as the femur, although there is some uncertainty in this ratio, as it is not certain that the humerus and femur from which this ratio was calculated belong to the same individual, and the femur in question is incomplete. [1]

Distinguishing anatomical features

The original diagnosis by Wiman is outdated. A diagnosis is a statement of the anatomical features of an organism (or group) that collectively distinguish it from all other organisms. Some of the features in a diagnosis may be autapomorphies. An autapomorphy is a distinctive anatomical feature that is unique to an organism or group.

Restoration EuhelopusDB2.jpg
Restoration

According to a study by Jeffrey A. Wilson and Paul Upchurch in 2009, Euhelopus can be distinguished based on, among others, these autapomorphies: [1]

Discovery and naming

Cast of the holotype skull on display in Japan Euhelopus skull.jpg
Cast of the holotype skull on display in Japan

The original discovery was by a Catholic priest, Father R. Mertens, in 1913. He showed some remains he had excavated to the German mining engineer Gustav Behaghel who in 1916 sent three vertebrae to the head of the Geological Survey of China Ding Wenjiang ("V.K. Ting"). This was probably the first occasion dinosaur bones from China were scientifically studied. With help of another Catholic priest, Father Alfred Kaschel, the site was rediscovered in November 1922 by Johan Gunnar Andersson and Tan Xichou. In March 1923, the Austrian student Otto Zdansky excavated two skeletons at sites about three kilometres apart and the holotype was studied by H. C. T'an, also in 1923. [2]

It was originally described and named Helopus, meaning "Marsh Foot", by the Swedish paleontologist Carl Wiman in 1929, after the Greek ἕλος, helos, "swamp", and πούς, pous, "foot". [11] The name refers to the marshy area of the finds and to truga, Swedish swamp shoes, which according to Wiman resembled the wide feet of the animal. [11] This name however, already belonged to a bird because the Caspian tern had once been named Helopus caspius Wagler 1832. The sauropod dinosaur was therefore renamed Euhelopus (True marsh-foot) in 1956 by Alfred Sherwood Romer. [12] There proved to be a plant genus (a grass) with the same generic name, Euhelopus. However, a genus in one biological kingdom may have a name that is used as a genus name in another kingdom, so Euhelopus was allowed. The type species is Helopus zdanskyi. The combinatio nova is Euhelopus zdanskyi. The specific name honours Zdansky. [11]

Left premaxilla and maxilla Euhelopus premaxilla and maxilla.png
Left premaxilla and maxilla

Specimen PMU 24705 (formerly PMU R233) forms according to Wilson & Upchurch the holotype, [1] descriptive basis, for the species Euhelopus zdanskyi. [3] It represents one of the skeletons found by Zdansky, named "Exemplar a" by Wiman, who did not formally assign a holotype. [11] This is the original skeleton found by Mertens. [11] Specimen PMU 24705 consists of a partial skeleton with skull and lower jaws comprising these bones: the rostral part of the left nasal; a partial right jugal; the tapered jugal process of the postorbital, partially excavated; the dorsal process of the right quadratojugal; the fragmented left pterygoid (another fragment might be the right splenial, but it is too fragile to be removed from its matrix), [3] a series of twenty-five presacral vertebrae and the left thighbone. [11]

The second skeleton, of an individual about as large as the holotype, was designated "Exemplar b" by Wiman. [11] It was by Wilson & Upchurch referred to Euhelopus. This specimen PMU 24706, formerly PMU 234, comprises nine articulated dorsal vertebrae and the sacrum, two dorsal ribs, a nearly complete pelvis, and a right hindlimb lacking the fifth metatarsal and several pedal phalanges. [4]

Both specimens are housed in the collection of the Paleontological Museum of Uppsala University, in Uppsala, Sweden, where the mounted skeletons are displayed since the 1930s. [1]

In 1923, Zdansky lacked the time to finish the excavation of the holotype. [11] In the autumn of 1934, C. C. Young and M. N. Bien returned to the locality and recovered a left scapulocoracoid, right coracoid and right humerus. Young described these remains, as well as the vertebrae Behagel had sent to Ting, in 1935. Young assigned all of these remains to Euhelopus zdanskyi except the incomplete right coracoid, and suggested that they probably belonged to the type specimen. [13] Yang and Bien's scapulocoracoid and humerus and Ting's vertebrae were designated "exemplar c" by Wilson & Upchurch in 2009. They were informed in 2007 that this material could no longer be located in the Chinese collections. [1]

Classification

Reconstructions of the skull Euhelopus.png
Reconstructions of the skull
Left dentary and surangular bones Left dentary and surangular of Euhelopus.png
Left dentary and surangular bones

Wiman in 1929 was uncertain about the affinities of Helopus and placed it in a Helopodidae of its own. [11] Yang made this a Helopodinae, first within the Morosauridae, then within the Brachiosauridae. Romer in 1956 created a Euhelopodinae. [12] In 1990, John Stanton McIntosh placed Euhelopus in the Camarasauridae. [14]

The phylogenetic affinities of Euhelopus are controversial, and it has been variously interpreted as having close affinities to Mamenchisaurus -like taxa [15] [9] or as being grouped together with titanosaurs in the clade Somphospondyli. [16] [1] [17] The clade containing Euhelopus and its close relatives is known as Euhelopodidae, but the ambiguity over Euhelopus's affinities has caused considerable uncertainty regarding the membership of Euhelopodidae. [17] Most studies favor the somphospondyl hypothesis for Euhelopus, but the lack of research on the anatomy of Mamenchisaurus-like sauropods has inhibited a rigorous test of the relationship between them and Euhelopus. [9]

Wilson and Upchurch (2009) noted that cladistic assessments suggest that Euhelopus belonged to a clade of sauropods, the Euhelopodidae, that originated during an interval of geographic isolation and was endemic to this geographical range in China. It is not clear if the Euhelopodidae are monophyletic. [1] Euhelopus demonstrates phylogenetic affinity to the taxon Titanosauria. Traditional claims that Euhelopus, Omeisaurus , Mamenchisaurus and Shunosaurus form the monophyletic family “Euhelopodidae” are not supported by new phylogenetic analysis. [18] The cladogram below follows José L. Carballido, Oliver W. M. Rauhut, Diego Pol and Leonardo Salgado (2011). [18]

Camarasauromorpha  

Camarasaurus

Europasaurus

Galvesaurus

Tehuelchesaurus

Janenschia

Tastavinsaurus

Euhelopus

Chubutisaurus

Wintonotitan

Titanosauriformes  

Brachiosauridae

Phuwiangosaurus

Titanosauria

Paleoecology

Restorations of the head Euhelopus zdanskyi.png
Restorations of the head

Provenance and occurrence

The type material for Euhelopus was excavated at the Mengyin Formation in Shandong (Shantung) Province, China. The specimens were collected by Otto Zdansky in 1923, in green/yellow sandstone and green/yellow siltstone.

The Mengyin Formation dates to the Berriasian-Valanginian. [19] It was previously regarded as having been deposited during the Barremian or Aptian stages of the Cretaceous period, about 129 to 113 million years ago. During the 1990s it was mistakenly thought the formation might date from the Late Jurassic. [1]

Footnotes

  1. ↑ The position of the cervicodorsal transition in Euhelopus is uncertain, and it is possible that the 18th vertebra in the series should also be considered as part of the neck. [1]

Related Research Articles

<i>Mamenchisaurus</i> Sauropod dinosaur genus from Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Period

Mamenchisaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur known for their remarkably long necks which made up nearly half the total body length. Numerous species have been assigned to the genus; however, many of these might be questionable. Fossils have been found in the Sichuan Basin and Yunnan Province in China. Several species are from the Upper Shaximiao Formation whose geologic age is uncertain. However, evidence suggests that this be no earlier than the Oxfordian stage of the Late Jurassic. M. sinocanadorum dates to the Oxfordian stage and M. anyuensis to the Aptian stage of the Early Cretaceous around 114.4 mya. Most species were medium to large size sauropods, around 15 to 26 meters in length and possibly up to 35 meters (115 ft) based on two undescribed vertebrae.

Ultrasaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur discovered by Haang Mook Kim in South Korea. However, the name was first used unofficially in 1979 by Jim Jensen to describe a set of giant dinosaur bones he discovered in the United States. Because Kim published the name for his specimen before Jensen could do so officially, Jensen renamed his specimen Ultrasauros. Jensen's giant sauropod was later found to be a chimera, and the type remains are now assigned to Supersaurus.

<i>Opisthocoelicaudia</i> Sauropod dinosaur genus from Late Cretaceous Mongolia

Opisthocoelicaudia is a genus of sauropod dinosaur of the Late Cretaceous Period discovered in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. The type species is Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii. A well-preserved skeleton lacking only the head and neck was unearthed in 1965 by Polish and Mongolian scientists, making Opisthocoelicaudia one of the best known sauropods from the Late Cretaceous. Tooth marks on this skeleton indicate that large carnivorous dinosaurs had fed on the carcass and possibly had carried away the now-missing parts. To date, only two additional, much less complete specimens are known, including part of a shoulder and a fragmentary tail. A relatively small sauropod, Opisthocoelicaudia measured about 11.4–13 m (37–43 ft) in length. Like other sauropods, it would have been characterised by a small head sitting on a very long neck and a barrel shaped trunk carried by four column-like legs. The name Opisthocoelicaudia means "posterior cavity tail", alluding to the unusual, opisthocoel condition of the anterior tail vertebrae that were concave on their posterior sides. This and other skeletal features lead researchers to propose that Opisthocoelicaudia was able to rear on its hindlegs.

<i>Andesaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Andesaurus is a genus of basal titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur which existed during the middle of the Cretaceous Period in South America. Like most sauropods, belonging to one of the largest animals ever to walk the Earth, it would have had a small head on the end of a long neck and an equally long tail.

<i>Omeisaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Omeisaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic Period of what is now China. Its name comes from Mount Emei, where it was discovered in the lower Shaximiao Formation of Sichuan Province.

<i>Huabeisaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Huabeisaurus was a genus of dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous. It was a sauropod which lived in what is present-day northern China. The type species, Huabeisaurus allocotus, was first described by Pang Qiqing and Cheng Zhengwu in 2000. Huabeisaurus is known from numerous remains found in the 1990s, which include teeth, partial limbs and vertebrae. Due to its relative completeness, Huabeisaurus represents a significant taxon for understanding sauropod evolution in Asia. Huabeisaurus comes from Kangdailiang and Houyu, Zhaojiagou Town, Tianzhen County, Shanxi province, China. The holotype was found in the unnamed upper member of the Huiquanpu Formation, which is Late Cretaceous (?Cenomanian–?Campanian) in age based on ostracods, charophytes, and fission-track dating.

<i>Tienshanosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Tienshanosaurus is an extinct genus of dinosaur from the Late Jurassic. It was a sauropod which lived in what is now China. Only one species is known, Tienshanosaurus chitaiensis, which was named and described in 1937.

<i>Klamelisaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Klamelisaurus is a genus of herbivorous sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic Shishugou Formation of China. The type species is Klamelisaurus gobiensis, which was named by Zhao Xijin in 1993, based on a partial skeleton discovered in 1982 near the abandoned town of Jiangjunmiao. Zhao described Klamelisaurus as the only member of a new subfamily, Klamelisaurinae, among the now-defunct primitive sauropod order Bothrosauropodoidea. Since Zhao's description, Klamelisaurus received limited attention from researchers until Andrew Moore and colleagues redescribed it in 2020.

<i>Patagosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Patagosaurus is an extinct genus of eusauropod dinosaur from the Middle-Late Toarcian of Patagonia, Argentina. It was first found in deposits of the Cañadón Asfalto Formation, which date to around 179 to 177 million years ago. Although originally twelve specimens were assigned to the taxon, at least one of them may belong to a different genus. Patagosaurus probably lived alongside genera as Piatnitzkysaurus, Condorraptor and Volkheimeria.

<i>Yuanmousaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Yuanmousaurus was a sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic period of China. It is known from incomplete remains, recovered in 2000 from the Zhanghe Formation in Yuanmou County in Yunnan Province. Yuanmousaurus was a relatively large sauropod and may have reached about 17 meters (56 ft) in length. It was a basal member of the Sauropoda, but its exact systematic position is unclear. A recent study placed Yuanmousaurus within the family Mamenchisauridae. It may be a dubious genus. The only and type species was Yuanmousaurus jiangyiensis.

<i>Phuwiangosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Phuwiangosaurus is a genus of titanosaur dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous (Valanginian-Hauterivian) Sao Khua Formation of Thailand. The type species, P. sirindhornae, was described by Martin, Buffetaut, and Suteethorn in a 1993 press release and was formally named in 1994. The species was named to honor Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn of Thailand, who was interested in the geology and palaeontology of Thailand, while the genus was named after the Phu Wiang area, where the fossil was discovered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euhelopodidae</span> Extinct family of dinosaurs

Euhelopodidae is a family of sauropod dinosaurs of disputed membership and affinities, which contains Euhelopus and its close relatives. Most proposed euhelopodids are from East Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camarasauridae</span> Extinct family of dinosaurs

Camarasauridae is a family of sauropod dinosaurs. Among sauropods, camarasaurids are small to medium-sized, with relatively short necks. They are visually identifiable by a short skull with large nares, and broad, spatulate teeth filling a thick jaw. Based on cervical vertebrae and cervical rib biomechanics, camarasaurids most likely moved their necks in a vertical, rather than horizontal, sweeping motion, in contrast to most diplodocids.

The Meng-Yin or Mengyin Formation is a geological formation in Shandong, China, whose strata date back to the Berriasian and Valanginian stages of the Early Cretaceous.

<i>Daxiatitan</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Daxiatitan is a genus of sauropod dinosaur known from the Lower Cretaceous of Gansu, China. Its type and only species is Daxiatitan binglingi. It is known from a single partial skeleton consisting of most of the neck and back vertebrae, two tail vertebrae, a shoulder blade, and a thigh bone. At the time of its discovery in 2008, Daxiatitan was regarded as potentially the largest known dinosaur from China.

<i>Xianshanosaurus</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Xianshanosaurus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian) of the Ruyang Basin in Henan Province, China. Its type and only species is Xianshanosaurus shijiagouensis. It was described in 2009 by a team of paleontologists led by Lü Junchang. Xianshanosaurus may be a titanosaur, and Daxiatitan may be its closest relative, but its evolutionary relationships remain controversial.

<i>Yongjinglong</i> Extinct genus of dinosaurs

Yongjinglong is an extinct genus of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaur known from the Early Cretaceous of Lanzhou-Minhe Basin of Gansu Province, China. It contains a single species, Yongjinglong datangi.

Wamweracaudia is a large herbivorous sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania, Africa, 155-145 million years ago.

Rhomaleopakhus is a genus of mamenchisaurid sauropod, dinosaur from the Late Jurassic Kalaza Formation of China. The type and only species is Rhomaleopakhus turpanensis.

Ruixinia is an extinct genus of somphospondylan titanosauriform dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Yixian Formation of China. The genus contains a single species, Ruixinia zhangi. The Ruixinia holotype is a partial articulated skeleton with the most complete series of caudal vertebrae known from any Asian titanosauriform.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Wilson, Jeffrey A.; Upchurch, Paul (2009). "Redescription and reassessment of the phylogenetic affinities of Euhelopus zdanskyi (Dinosauria:Sauropoda) from the Early Cretaceous of China". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 7 (2): 199–239. doi:10.1017/S1477201908002691. S2CID   84505064.
  2. 1 2 T'an, H. C. (1923). New research on the Mesozoic and early Tertiary geology in Shantung. Geological Survey of China Bulletin 5:95-135
  3. 1 2 3 Poropat, Stephen F.; Kear, Benjamin P. (2013-11-21). "Photographic Atlas and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Holotype Skull of Euhelopus zdanskyi with Description of Additional Cranial Elements". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e79932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079932 . PMC   3836988 . PMID   24278222.
  4. 1 2 "Euhelopus." In: Dodson, Peter & Britt, Brooks & Carpenter, Kenneth & Forster, Catherine A. & Gillette, David D. & Norell, Mark A. & Olshevsky, George & Parrish, J. Michael & Weishampel, David B. The Age of Dinosaurs. Publications International, LTD. p. 70. ISBN   0-7853-0443-6.
  5. ↑ Paul, G.S., 2016, The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Second Edition, Princeton University Press p. 224
  6. ↑ Benson, Roger B. J.; Campione, Nicolás E.; Carrano, Matthew T.; Mannion, Philip D.; Sullivan, Corwin; Upchurch, Paul; Evans, David C. (2014-05-06). "Rates of Dinosaur Body Mass Evolution Indicate 170 Million Years of Sustained Ecological Innovation on the Avian Stem Lineage". PLOS Biology. 12 (5): e1001853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001853 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   4011683 . PMID   24802911.
  7. ↑ Larramendi, Asier; Paul, Gregory S.; Hsu, Shu‐yu (2020-12-01). "A review and reappraisal of the specific gravities of present and past multicellular organisms, with an emphasis on tetrapods". The Anatomical Record. 304 (9): 1833–1888. doi: 10.1002/ar.24574 . ISSN   1932-8486. PMID   33258532. S2CID   227243708.
  8. ↑ Taylor, Michael P.; Wedel, Mathew J. (2013-02-12). "Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks". PeerJ. 1: –36. doi: 10.7717/peerj.36 . ISSN   2167-8359. PMC   3628838 . PMID   23638372.
  9. 1 2 3 Moore, Andrew J.; Upchurch, Paul; Barrett, Paul M.; Clark, James M.; Xu, Xing (2020-05-28). "Osteology of Klamelisaurus gobiensis (Dinosauria, Eusauropoda) and the evolutionary history of Middle–Late Jurassic Chinese sauropods". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (16): 1299–1393. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1759706. ISSN   1477-2019. S2CID   219749618.
  10. ↑ Gorscak, Eric; O'Connor, Patrick M.; Stevens, Nancy J.; Roberts, Eric M. (2014-07-29). "The basal titanosaurian Rukwatitan bisepultus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the middle Cretaceous Galula Formation, Rukwa Rift Basin, southwestern Tanzania". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 34 (5): 1133–1154. doi:10.1080/02724634.2014.845568. ISSN   0272-4634.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C. Wiman. 1929. "Die Kreide-Dinosaurier aus Shantung" [The Cretaceous dinosaurs from Shantung]. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series C6(1): 1-67
  12. 1 2 A.S. Romer. 1956. Osteology of the Reptiles, University of Chicago Press 772 pp
  13. ↑ Young, C. C. (1935). "Dinosaurian remains from Mengyin, Shantung". Bulletin of the Geological Society of China. 14 (4): 519–533. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6724.1935.mp14004004.x.
  14. ↑ McIntosh, J.S. 1990. "Sauropoda". Pp. 345-401 in: Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P. & Osmólska, H. (eds) The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley
  15. ↑ Upchurch, Paul (1995-09-29). "The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 349 (1330): 365–390. doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0125. eISSN   1471-2970. ISSN   0962-8436.
  16. ↑ Wilson, Jeffrey A.; Sereno, Paul C. (1998-06-15). "Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs" (PDF). Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir. 5: 1–68. doi:10.2307/3889325. ISSN   1062-161X. JSTOR   3889325.
  17. 1 2 D'Emic, Michael D. (2012). "The early evolution of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 166 (3): 624–671. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00853.x. hdl: 2027.42/94293 . ISSN   0024-4082. S2CID   54752135.
  18. 1 2 José L. Carballido; Oliver W. M. Rauhut; Diego Pol & Leonardo Salgado (2011). "Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Tehuelchesaurus benitezii (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Patagonia". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 163 (2): 605–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00723.x . hdl: 11336/71888 .
  19. ↑ Xu, Jianqiang; Li, Zhong (2015). "Middle-late Mesozoic sedimentary provinces of the Luxi and Jiaolai areas: implications for tectonic evolution of the North China Block". Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 111: 284–301. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.008.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.