European Monetary Agreement

Last updated

The European Monetary Agreement (EMA) was an economic arrangement signed by 17 European countries in Paris on the 5th of August 1955. [1] It replaced the European Payments Union which ended in 1958. [2] The EMA was administered by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). [3] The OECD did this to achieve economic integration by coordinating the exchange rates of the 17 member countries. [4] This allowed the countries to directly convert their currencies and integrate their balance of payments accounts, which promoted free trade. [5] Due to advanced facilities offered by the International Monetary Fund, the EMA was ended in 1972. [6] The European Economic Community oversaw the EMA aiming to achieve a greater level of economic integration within Europe. [2] The European Economic Community was the legal successor at the time, however it has advanced and is now referred to as the European Union. [7]

Contents

European Monetary Agreement
Duration17 years
MotiveEuropean economic integration
OutcomeCurrency convertibility across Europe

History

Europe during the Second World War: 1941-1942 Second world war europe 1941-1942 map en.png
Europe during the Second World War: 1941-1942

Prior to the European Monetary Agreement, the European Payments Union was the agreement in place. [1] This was an organisation which was bilateral in nature, and enabled trade between the European countries through an automatic credit system. [8] The credit system within the framework of the European Payments Union was imposed to make transfers and recognition of credit between countries automatic. [4] There was trade discrimination which still occurred with these features of the European Payments Union, and this resulted in the increased stagnation of intra-European trade. [9] The EMA was implemented following this to boost the trade and economic growth of the member states. [10] This was done in order to rebuild the individual economies within Europe, so that the overall European economy could recover from this situation which had been created by the prior agreements and organisations. [11] One difference that was noticed in the EMA compared with the European Payments Union was greater coordination of individual exchange rates held by each country for monthly settlements. [4] This was instead of using a single exchange rate to cover all countries for settlements. [5] Additionally, the EMA was a multilateral system and allowed a smaller amount of interim finance, a form of short-term borrowing, to be taken between countries in comparison to the European Payments Union. [5] [11] The loan granting as well as the multilateral settlements imposed by the EMA were not automatic or mandatory, which was a new aspect compared to prior organisations. [1] These changes were implemented to achieve currency convertibility and the overarching aim of the EMA. [11]

As a continuation from the European Payments Union, the EMA similarly had a managing board which regularly monitored the developments of the member countries. This was done particularly through individual consultations about their exchange rate policies and balance of payments. [12] From the impact of the European Payments Union, the trade deficit across Europe had recovered and overall trade increased within member countries. As a result of this, the countries also had greater financial stability. [8]

Due to the Second World War, currency convertibility was not an immediate option for most countries as there was a significant imbalance across the global economy. [9] This imbalance was primarily created from the deficit in the current account of Europe following the War. [7] This meant the feat of currency convertibility had to be slowly worked towards over the long-term, as the balance of payments in Europe was impacted by the trade deficit. [4] Currency convertibility was then eventually achieved through the EMA. [2] Prior to the EMA, countries feared they would lose financial reserves if currency convertibility was implemented, and thus this formed part of the debate around the European multilateral convertibility. [9] There was potential for loss of financial reserves as these are used to influence the rate of exchange, which would not have been necessary once currency convertibility was in place. [5]

Aim

There were various goals which were set out to be achieved through the implementation of the European Monetary Agreement, however there was one main aim. The aim of the EMA was to reduce the short-term credit, a form of loans, that was received between the member countries from one another. [5] It was hoped this would be achieved through the changes made when moving from the European Payments Union to the EMA. The EMA was a short-term phase as part of a long-term plan for the economic integration of Europe. [13] It followed previous agreements which were all created to boost the growth and development of the European economy. This was done particularly through trade liberalisation and increased production, following the effects of the Second World War. [9] It was hoped that a high level of trade liberalisation could be maintained between the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, even if they did not yet have convertible currencies. [11]

Through the implementation of the EMA, it was intended that this agreement would eventually help Europe move towards an overall monetary union. [2] The EMA was a framework arranged to further progress the work of the European Payments Union, which was responsible for the cooperation of exchange of goods and services between countries. [6] In doing this, the EMA hoped to assist the European Economic Community. It hoped to do this by achieving a fixed exchange rate system, consistent economic policy, and a union where factors of production such as capital and particularly labour were free to move around. [2]

Economic vs. Political Motivations

The journey to economic integration, of which the European Monetary Agreement was a small part, was instigated due to a range of political motivations and historical views. [14] With the decisions and policies implemented, both prior to and during the EMA, there was debate around whether these were inspired by political or economic objectives. [10] The idea of a common institutional framework required the cooperation of individual economic policies as well as the political policies of member governments. [12] This meant that political rivalry across the European countries was lessened, in order to achieve mutual economic cooperation, which also led to increased political integration. [11] [14]

The increased integration formed by the EMA also resulted in a loss of national autonomy and sovereignty for the member governments and their nations. [12] The individual governments within the EMA were required to give up their autonomous use of certain policies, in particular fiscal policy and monetary policy. [14] This element of political integration was required in order for the EMA to achieve unity across the exchange rates and trade policies within Europe. [5] Through the views of economic stakeholders and politicians, as well as events such as the falling of the Berlin Wall and Germany’s recovery from war, Europeans became satisfied with the idea of economic integration in Europe. [7] The European countries were motivated by the prospect of economic recovery following the war. [9] This led to stability and a high degree of coordination of the political policies across the member countries within Europe. [11] [12] There were concerns about the political nature of this integration, and through agreements such as the EMA, the accelerated globalisation and economic growth which could be achieved became clear. [15]

Although, following the economic and political integration that had been implemented within the EMA, there were some countries which preferred a system of only economic integration. [11] In the 1950s following the establishment of the EMA, these countries, including Denmark, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland and Austria chose to form their own external free trade areas. [14] These free trade areas were not focused on political integration, rather solely on achieving the economic objectives and policies of the countries. One example was the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). [16] The formation of free trade areas such as EFTA showcased the divide in views between the member nations of the EMA. [15] EFTA also portrayed how each country had different motivations in terms of what they believed was required to achieve economic growth and economic development through integration. [14] [16]  

Impacts

Current member states of the European Union Member States of the European Union (polar stereographic projection) 2020 EN.jpg
Current member states of the European Union

Economic & Political Repercussions

All financial transactions which occurred as a result of the European Monetary Agreement were managed by the Bank for International Settlements. [1] The policy changes made through the EMA established greater currency convertibility for members of the agreement. [5] This enabled currencies of countries within the agreement to be exchanged freely. [4] The impact of currency convertibility was due to the removal of many exchange restrictions as well as the removal of limits on imports. [8] These actions meant that less barriers to trade were in place. This enabled the countries in the agreement to trade with greater freedom, further improving the degree of economic integration across Europe. [16] Due to the economic stability achieved through this level of currency convertibility, high levels of employment and economic growth were achieved both domestically across the member countries, as well as across the overall economy of this agreement. [11]

However, complete currency convertibility within Europe was not achieved until the late 1980s. [6] The EMA was one part of the European Economic Community’s plan, which was to achieve overall economic integration in the long run. [2] The EMA contributed to this through the currency convertibility which established a pathway to a European common currency and a common central bank. [13]

The EMA had short-term impacts, however it also played a role in the final establishment of the European Union. [16] The European Union is the current monetary union which possesses a common currency, the Euro, and demonstrates a high level of cooperation and integration between the member countries. [13] This existence of a common currency and central bank was contributed to by the EMA. This enabled price stability and social protection for the citizens of Europe under a common law. [17] [18] Other than economic integration, the EMA also contributed to an improved level of political unity. [9] This was through the higher level of cooperation it established between governments, particularly with government trade policies. [14] Governments of the member countries were able to cooperate in all trade deals made with non-member countries. [2] Although, this political unity which arose from the high level of integration meant that the individual governments lost policies such as monetary policy as instruments of their own individual economic policy. [14]

Successors

There have been various successors to the European Monetary Agreement, including the European Monetary System which began in 1979, the Single European Act which started operating in 1987, as well as the Common Agricultural Policy. [10] These also impacted the European economy, in particular through promoting trade and building on the financial credit system developed by the EMA. [16] [19] There continues to be policies and arrangements implemented to continue the development of economic integration within Europe, even though the outcomes of many of the prior policies have already been achieved. [12]

Overtime, economic integration within Europe, including the impacts of the EMA as well as its predecessors and successors, has been referred to as a project which promised different outcomes to three specific generations. [17] It was stated by Benoît Cœuré, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, that these groups of people were expected to be impacted differently from the European economic integration based on their history and socioeconomic status. [7] [18] For the generation following war, their expectation from this integration was lifelong democracy and peace. The generation from Europe who experienced the falling of the Berlin Wall during their youth were assured they would have greater opportunities and freedom in their life. [10] The other collective of people to be affected by the European integration were European workers impacted by increased global competition and changes in technology. These people were guaranteed there would be both social and economic security to protect them from the increased production worldwide. [18] The third promise is yet to be fulfilled, as since this integration began there have been high levels of unemployment, in particular youth unemployment. [17] Although, the European economic integration following the EMA has led to various developments and continues to be updated under the European Union. [10] [16]

Related Research Articles

CFA franc

The CFA franc is the name of two currencies, the West African CFA franc, used in eight West African countries, and the Central African CFA franc, used in six Central African countries. Both currencies are guaranteed by the French treasury. Although separate, the two CFA franc currencies have always been at parity and are effectively interchangeable. The ISO currency codes are XAF for the Central African CFA franc and XOF for the West African CFA franc. On 22 December 2019, it was announced that the West African currency would be replaced by an independent currency to be called Eco.

Economic and monetary union trade bloc with a common tariff and currency

An economic and monetary union (EMU) is a type of trade bloc that features a combination of a common market, customs union, and monetary union. Established via a trade pact, an EMU constitutes the sixth of seven stages in the process of economic integration. An EMU agreement usually combines a customs union with a common market. A typical EMU establishes free trade and a common external tariff throughout its jurisdiction. It is also designed to protect freedom in the movement of goods, services, and people. This arrangement is distinct from a monetary union, which does not usually involve a common market. As with the economic and monetary union established among the 27 member states of the European Union (EU), an EMU may affect different parts of its jurisdiction in different ways. Some areas are subject to separate customs regulations from other areas subject to the EMU. These various arrangements may be established in a formal agreement, or they may exist on a de facto basis. For example, not all EU member states use the Euro established by its currency union, and not all EU member states are part of the Schengen Area. Some EU members participate in both unions, and some in neither.

Maastricht Treaty Founding treaty of the European Union

The Maastricht Treaty, concluded in 1992 between the 12 member states of the European Communities, is the foundation treaty of the European Union (EU). Formally the Treaty on European Union, it announced "a new stage in the process of European integration" chiefly in provisions for a shared European citizenship, for the eventual introduction of a single currency, and for common foreign and security policies. Although these were widely seen to presage a "federal Europe", the focus of constitutional debate shifted to the later 2007 Treaty of Lisbon. In the wake of the Eurozone debt crisis unfolding from 2009, the most enduring reference to the Maastricht Treaty has been to the rules of compliance – the "Maastricht criteria" – for the currency union.

Economic Community of West African States intergovernmental economic union

The Economic Community of West African States, also known as ECOWAS, is a regional political and economic union of fifteen countries located in West Africa. Collectively, these countries comprise an area of 5,114,162 km2 (1,974,589 sq mi), and in 2015 had an estimated population of over 349 million.

The global financial system is the worldwide framework of legal agreements, institutions, and both formal and informal economic actors that together facilitate international flows of financial capital for purposes of investment and trade financing. Since emerging in the late 19th century during the first modern wave of economic globalization, its evolution is marked by the establishment of central banks, multilateral treaties, and intergovernmental organizations aimed at improving the transparency, regulation, and effectiveness of international markets. In the late 1800s, world migration and communication technology facilitated unprecedented growth in international trade and investment. At the onset of World War I, trade contracted as foreign exchange markets became paralyzed by money market illiquidity. Countries sought to defend against external shocks with protectionist policies and trade virtually halted by 1933, worsening the effects of the global Great Depression until a series of reciprocal trade agreements slowly reduced tariffs worldwide. Efforts to revamp the international monetary system after World War II improved exchange rate stability, fostering record growth in global finance.

The Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial and financial relations among the United States, Canada, Western European countries, Australia, and Japan after the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of a fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern monetary relations among independent states. The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained its external exchange rates within 1 percent by tying its currency to gold and the ability of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to bridge temporary imbalances of payments. Also, there was a need to address the lack of cooperation among other countries and to prevent competitive devaluation of the currencies as well.

In macroeconomics and modern monetary policy, a devaluation is an official lowering of the value of a country's currency within a fixed exchange-rate system, in which a monetary authority formally sets a lower exchange rate of the national currency in relation to a foreign reference currency or currency basket. The opposite of devaluation, a change in the exchange rate making the domestic currency more expensive, is called a revaluation. A monetary authority maintains a fixed value of its currency by being ready to buy or sell foreign currency with the domestic currency at a stated rate; a devaluation is an indication that the monetary authority will buy and sell foreign currency at a lower rate.

The European Monetary System (EMS) was a system whereby most of the nations of the European Economic Community (EEC) linked their currencies to prevent large fluctuations relative to one another. It was initiated in 1979 under then President of the European Commission Roy Jenkins, as an arrangement of the Member States of the European Economic Community (EEC) to foster closer monetary policy co-operation between the Central Banks for the purpose of managing intra-community exchange rates and finance exchange market interventions.

Currency union

A currency union is an intergovernmental agreement that involves two or more states sharing the same currency. These states may not necessarily have any further integration.

Eco (currency)

The Eco is the proposed name for the common currency that the West African Monetary Zone (WAMZ) plans to introduce in the framework of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). This objective is to create a common currency for all West Africa states. This will also serve to enable the French-speaking west African region to abandon the colonial French CFA for the ECO, in order to regain fiscal and monetary independence from France.

The European Payments Union (EPU) was an organization in existence from July 1950 to December 1958, when it was replaced by the European Monetary Agreement.

In economics, an optimum currency area (OCA) or optimal currency region (OCR), is a geographical region in which it would maximize economic efficiency to have the entire region share a single currency.

CARICOM Single Market and Economy common market

The CARICOM Single Market and Economy, also known as the Caribbean Single Market and Economy (CSME), is an integrated development strategy envisioned at the 10th Meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) which took place in July 1989 in Grand Anse, Grenada. The Grand Anse Declaration had three key Features:

  1. Deepening economic integration by advancing beyond a common market towards a Single Market and Economy.
  2. Widening the membership and thereby expanding the economic mass of the Caribbean Community.
  3. Progressive insertion of the region into the global trading and economic system by strengthening trading links with non-traditional partners.
Monetary hegemony

Monetary hegemony is an economic and political concept in which a single state has decisive influence over the functions of the international monetary system. A monetary hegemon would need:

Soviet foreign trade played only a minor role in the Soviet economy. In 1985, for example, exports and imports each accounted for only 4 percent of the Soviet gross national product. The Soviet Union maintained this low level because it could draw upon a large energy and raw material base, and because it historically had pursued a policy of self-sufficiency. Other foreign economic activity included economic aid programs, which primarily benefited the less developed Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON) countries of Cuba, Mongolia, and Vietnam.

Denmark and the euro

Denmark uses the krone as its currency and does not use the euro, having negotiated the right to opt out from participation under the Maastricht Treaty of 1992. In 2000, the government held a referendum on introducing the euro, which was defeated with 46.8% voting yes and 53.2% voting no. The Danish krone is part of the ERM II mechanism, so its exchange rate is tied to within 2.25% of the euro.

A fixed exchange rate, sometimes called a pegged exchange rate, is a type of exchange rate regime in which a currency's value is fixed or pegged by a monetary authority against the value of another currency, a basket of other currencies, or another measure of value, such as gold.

An international monetary system is a set of internationally agreed rules, conventions and supporting institutions that facilitate international trade, cross border investment and generally the reallocation of capital between nation states. It should provide means of payment acceptable to buyers and sellers of different nationalities, including deferred payment. To operate successfully, it needs to inspire confidence, to provide sufficient liquidity for fluctuating levels of trade, and to provide means by which global imbalances can be corrected. The system can grow organically as the collective result of numerous individual agreements between international economic factors spread over several decades. Alternatively, it can arise from a single architectural vision, as happened at Bretton Woods in 1944.

Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union economic union and policies

The Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) is an umbrella term for the group of policies aimed at converging the economies of member states of the European Union at three stages. The policies cover the 19 eurozone states, as well as non-euro European Union states.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "The European Payments Union - Historical events in the European integration process (1945–2014) - CVCE Website". www.cvce.eu. Retrieved 2020-05-25.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ingram, J (1973). "The case for European Monetary Integration" (PDF). 98: 1–27 – via Princeton University.Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ↑ The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (2012). "European Monetary Agreement". www.infoplease.com. Retrieved 2020-05-28.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Jones, Dallas (1957). "The European Monetary Agreement, the European Payments Union, and Convertibility". The Journal of Finance. 12 (3): 333–347. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1957.tb04142.x.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "European Monetary Agreement: guide to the new convertible currencies how scheme works". South China Morning Post. 1959.
  6. 1 2 3 "European Monetary Agreement Organisation". archives.eui.eu. 2013. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Dinan, Desmond (2014), "The Limits of European Union", Europe Recast, Macmillan Education UK, pp. 305–351, doi:10.1007/978-1-137-43645-0_10, ISBN   978-1-137-43644-3
  8. 1 2 3 "European monetary agreement comes under U.S. reappraisal: U.S. reappraises a monetary pact". New York Times. 1971.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Coffey, P; Presley, J.R (1971). European Monetary Integration. Macmillan. pp. 1–22.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Da Costa Cabral, Nazaré, Herausgeber. Gonçalves, José Renato, Herausgeber. Cunha Rodrigues, Nuno, Herausgeber. (30 November 2016). The Euro and the Crisis : Perspectives for the Eurozone as a Monetary and Budgetary Union. ISBN   978-3-319-45710-9. OCLC   967786653.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ungerer, Horst. (1997). A concise history of European monetary integration : from EPU to EMU. Quorum Books. ISBN   0-89930-981-X. OCLC   36051244.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Ungerer, Horst (1995). "Political Aspects of European Monetary Integration After World War II" (PDF). 13.Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. 1 2 3 James, Harold; Draghi, Mario; Caruana, Jaime (2012). Making the European Monetary Union. Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0-674-06683-0. JSTOR   j.ctt2jbx5b.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Brou, Daniel; Ruta, Michele (2011-08-24). "Economic Integration, Political Integration or Both?". Journal of the European Economic Association. 9 (6): 1143–1167. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01037.x. ISSN   1542-4766.
  15. 1 2 De Grauwe, Paul; Zhang, Zhaoyong (2011). "Introduction to Special Issue: Globalisation and Economic Integration in East Asia". International Journal of Business Studies. 19 (4): 1–5.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 BBC (2007-03-12). "A timeline of the EU" . Retrieved 2020-05-28.
  17. 1 2 3 Cœuré, Benoît (2013). "The political dimension of European economic integration". European Central Bank. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  18. 1 2 3 Cœuré, Benoît (2016). "Addressing Europe's economic and political challenges". European Central Bank. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  19. ↑ International Monetary Fund (1990). EUropean Monetary System: Developments & Perspectives, Occ. Paper No. 73. Occasional Papers. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund. doi:10.5089/9781557751720.084. ISBN   978-1-55775-172-0.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.