The factual accuracy of parts of this article (those related to article) may be compromised due to out-of-date information.(December 2012) |
Haplogroup O-M119 | |
---|---|
Possible time of origin | 33,181 [95% CI 24,461 <-> 36,879] years ago (Karmin 2022 [1] ) 34,100 or 29,200 years ago (Poznik 2016 [2] ) 31,590 ybp [3] 30,000 [95% CI 27,900 <-> 32,200] years before present (YFull 2018 [4] ) |
Coalescence age | 19,680 ybp [5] 17,500 [95% CI 19,400 <-> 15,500] years before present (YFull 2018 [4] ) |
Possible place of origin | pre-han Southern China |
Ancestor | haplogroup O-F265 |
Defining mutations | M119 |
Highest frequencies | Southern China, Taiwan, Malay Archipelago, Pacific islands, Madagascar |
In human genetics, Haplogroup O-M119 is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. Haplogroup O-M119 is a descendant branch of haplogroup O-F265 also known as O1a, one of two extant primary subclades of Haplogroup O-M175. The same clade previously has been labeled as O-MSY2.2. [6]
The Haplogroup O-M119 branch is believed to have evolved during the Late Pleistocene (Upper Paleolithic) in China mainland.[ citation needed ]
Karafet et al. (2010) suggest haplogroup O-M119 was part of a four-phase colonization model in which Paleolithic migrations of hunter-gatherers shaped the primary structure of current Y-Chromosome diversity of Maritime Southeast Asia. Approximately 5000 BCE, Haplogroup O-M119 coalesced at Sundaland and migrated northwards to as far as Taiwan, where O-M50 constitutes some 90% of the Aboriginal Y-DNA, being the main haplogroup that can be directly linked to the Austronesian expansion in phase 3.
The Liangdao man, an 8,000 year old skeleton found on Liang Island in the Republic of China off the coast of Fujian, is believed to belong to Haplogroup O-M119, specifically under branch O-CTS5726. [7] [8]
Li et al. (2008) concluded that in contrast to the Taiwan homeland hypothesis, Island Southeast Asians do not have a Taiwan origin based on their paternal lineages. According to their results, lineages within Maritime Southeast Asia did not originate from Taiwanese aborigines as linguistic studies suggest. Taiwan aborigines and Indonesians were likely to have been derived from the Tai–Kadai-speaking populations based on their paternal lineages, and thereafter evolved independently of each other.
The strongest positive correlation between Haplogroup O-M119 and ethno-linguistic affiliation is that which is observed between this haplogroup and the Austronesians. The peak frequency of Haplogroup O-M119 is found among the aborigines of Taiwan, precisely the region from which linguists have hypothesized that the Austronesian language family originated. A slightly weaker correlation is observed between Haplogroup O-M119 and the Han Chinese populations of southern China, as well as between this haplogroup and the Tai–Kadai-speaking populations of southern China and Southeast Asia. The distribution of Tai–Kadai languages in Thailand and other parts of Southeast Asia outside of China has long been believed, for reasons of traditional linguistic geography, to reflect a recent invasion of Southeast Asia by Tai–Kadai-speaking populations originating from southeastern China, and the somewhat elevated frequency of Haplogroup O-M119 among the Tai–Kadai populations, coupled with a high frequency of Haplogroup O-M95, which is a genetic characteristic of the Austroasiatic-speaking peoples of Southeast Asia, suggests that the genetic signature of the Tai–Kadai peoples' affinity with populations of southeastern China has been weakened due to extensive assimilation of the earlier Austroasiatic residents of the lands which the Tai–Kadai peoples invaded.
Haplogroup O-M119 lineages are found primarily in Southeast Asian populations of Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, southern China and Taiwan ( ISOGG 2010 ). High frequencies of this haplogroup have been found in populations spread in an arc through southeastern China, Taiwan, the Philippines, and Indonesia. It has been found with generally lower frequency in samples from Oceania, mainland Southeast Asia, Southwest China, Northwest China, North China, Northeast China, Korea, Japan, North Asia, and Central Asia.
A 2008 study by Li suggested that the admixture analyses of Tai–Kadai-speaking populations showed a significant genetic influence in a large proportion of Indonesians. Most of the population samples contained a high frequency of haplogroup O-M119. [9]
The frequencies of Haplogroup O-M119 among various East Asian and Austronesian populations suggest a complex genetic history of the modern Han populations of southern China.[ citation needed ] Although Haplogroup O-M119 occurs only at an average frequency of approximately 4% among Han populations of northern China and peoples of southwestern China and Southeast Asia who speak Tibeto-Burman languages, the frequency of this haplogroup among the Han populations of southern China nearly quadruples to about 15-23%. [10] The frequency of Haplogroup O-M119 among the Southern Han has been found to be slightly greater than the arithmetic mean of the frequencies of Haplogroup O-M119 among the Northern Han and a pooled sample of Austronesian populations. This suggests that modern Southern Han populations may possess a non-trivial number of male ancestors who were originally affiliated with some Austronesian-related culture, or who at least shared some genetic affinity with many of the ancestors of modern Austronesian peoples. [11] [12]
This lineage is found frequently in Austronesians, southern Han Chinese, and Kra-Dai peoples. [13] This lineage is presumed to be a marker of the prehistoric Austronesian expansion, with possible origins encompassing the regions along the southeastern coast of China and neighboring Taiwan, and is found among modern populations of Maritime Southeast Asia and Oceania ( Karafet 2005 ).
Haplogroup O-M119 Y-chromosomes also have been found to occur at low frequency among various populations of Siberia, such as the Nivkhs (one of 17 sampled Y-chromosomes), Ulchi/Nanai (2/53), Yenisey Evenks (1/31), and especially the Buryats living in the Sayan-Baikal uplands of Irkutsk Oblast (6/13) ( Lell 2002 ).
O-P203 was found in 86.7% (52/60) of a sample from Nias, 70.8% (34/48) of Taiwanese Aboriginals, 28.4% (21/74) of Mentawai, 11.4% (73/641) of Balinese, 9.8% (6/61) of a sample from Java, 9.1% (36/394) of a sample from Flores, 9.1% (15/165) of Han Chinese, 8.3% (1/12) of a sample from Western Samoa, 8.2% (4/49) of Tujia from Hunan, 6.9% (4/58) of Miao from China, 5.7% (4/70) of Vietnamese, 3.3% (1/30) of a sample from the Moluccas, 3.1% (1/32) of Malaysians, 3.0% (1/33) of a sample from highland Papua New Guinea, 2.6% (1/38) of a sample from Sumatra, 2.3% (2/86) of a sample from Borneo, 2.1% (1/48) of Filipinos, 2.0% (1/51) of She, 1.7% (1/60) of Yao from Guangxi, 1.1% (1/92) of a sample from Lembata, and 0.9% (3/350) of a sample from Sumba. [14]
In a study published in 2011, O-P203 was observed in 22.2% (37/167) of Han Chinese male volunteers at Fudan University in Shanghai whose origin may be traced back to East China (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, or Anhui), 12.3% (8/65) of Han Chinese male volunteers whose origin may be traced back to South China, and 1.6% (2/129) of Han Chinese male volunteers whose origin may be traced back to North China. [15]
This lineage was observed in one individual from China ( Underhill 2000 ) and another from Kota Kinabalu ( Hurles 2005 ).
According to the website of Chinese genetic testing company 23mofang, O-M101 is a subclade of O-M307/P203 (O-M307 > O-F446 > O-F5498 > O-Z23406 > O-M101). Its TMRCA is estimated to be 4,850 years before present, and it is estimated to account for the Y-DNA of approximately 0.21% of all males in present-day China, with its distribution being relatively dense in Hunan, Hubei, Hainan, and Jiangxi. [16] The O-M101 > O-A5863 > O-SK1573 subclade (TMRCA 3,400 ybp) has been estimated to account for the Y-DNA of approximately 0.08% of all males in present-day China, being relatively concentrated in South Central China and Southwest China at present. [17] The O-M101 > O-A5863 > O-Y163909 subclade (TMRCA 4,080 ybp) has been observed in 16.7% (3/18) of a sample of Phuan males from Central Thailand. [18] [19]
This lineage occurs among Austronesian peoples of Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Madagascar as well as among some populations of continental Southeast Asia and among Bantu peoples of the Comoros. [20] It also has been found in a Hawaiian. [21]
A study published in 2005 found O-M50 in 33.3% (13/39) of a sample of aboriginals in Taiwan, 18.2% (2/11) of a sample of people in Majuro, 17.1% (6/35) of a sample of Malagasy, 9.2% (6/65) of a sample of people in Kota Kinabalu, 9.1% (2/22) of a sample of people in Banjarmasin, 3.6% (1/28) of a sample of people in the Philippines, and 1.9% (1/52) of a sample of people in Vanuatu. [22]
Kayser et al. 2008 found O-M110 in 34.1% (14/41) of a sample of Taiwan Aborigines, 17.7% (26/147) of a sample from the Admiralty Islands, 17.3% (9/52) of a sample from the Trobriand Islands, 13.5% (5/37) of a sample from the Philippines, 9.7% (3/31) of a sample from the Nusa Tenggara Islands, 3.8% (2/53) of a sample from Java, 3.0% (1/33) of a sample from the Moluccas, 2.5% (1/40) of a sample from Borneo, 1.0% (1/100) of a sample from Tuvalu, and 0.95% (1/105) of a sample from Fiji. [23]
A study published in 2010 found O-M110 in 18.8% (9/48) Taiwanese Aboriginals, 13.3% (8/60) Nias, 8.3% (4/48) Philippines, 7.4% (4/54) Sulawesi, 6.3% (22/350) Sumba, 5.8% (5/86) Borneo, 3.3% (1/30) Moluccas, 2.3% (1/44) Maewo, Vanuatu, 1.6% (1/61) Java, 1.4% (1/74) Mentawai, and 0.8% (5/641) Bali. [24]
A study published in 2012 found O-M110 in 4.6% (33/712) of males from the Solomon Islands. [25]
Prior to 2002, there were in academic literature at least seven naming systems for the Y-Chromosome Phylogenetic tree. This led to considerable confusion. In 2002, the major research groups came together and formed the Y-Chromosome Consortium (YCC). They published a joint paper that created a single new tree that all agreed to use. Later, a group of citizen scientists with an interest in population genetics and genetic genealogy formed a working group to create an amateur tree aiming at being above all timely. The table below brings together all of these works at the point of the landmark 2002 YCC Tree. This allows a researcher reviewing older published literature to quickly move between nomenclatures.
YCC 2002/2008 (Shorthand) | (α) | (β) | (γ) | (δ) | (ε) | (ζ) | (η) | YCC 2002 (Longhand) | YCC 2005 (Longhand) | YCC 2008 (Longhand) | YCC 2010r (Longhand) | ISOGG 2006 | ISOGG 2007 | ISOGG 2008 | ISOGG 2009 | ISOGG 2010 | ISOGG 2011 | ISOGG 2012 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O-M175 | 26 | VII | 1U | 28 | Eu16 | H9 | I | O* | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O |
O-M119 | 26 | VII | 1U | 32 | Eu16 | H9 | H | O1* | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a | O1a |
O-M101 | 26 | VII | 1U | 32 | Eu16 | H9 | H | O1a | O1a1 | O1a1a | O1a1a | O1a1 | O1a1 | O1a1a | O1a1a | O1a1a | O1a1a | O1a1a |
O-M50 | 26 | VII | 1U | 32 | Eu16 | H10 | H | O1b | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 | O1a2 |
O-P31 | 26 | VII | 1U | 33 | Eu16 | H5 | I | O2* | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 | O2 |
O-M95 | 26 | VII | 1U | 34 | Eu16 | H11 | G | O2a* | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a | O2a1 | O2a1 |
O-M88 | 26 | VII | 1U | 34 | Eu16 | H12 | G | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1 | O2a1a | O2a1a |
O-SRY465 | 20 | VII | 1U | 35 | Eu16 | H5 | I | O2b* | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b | O2b |
O-47z | 5 | VII | 1U | 26 | Eu16 | H5 | I | O2b1 | O2b1a | O2b1 | O2b1 | O2b1a | O2b1a | O2b1 | O2b1 | O2b1 | O2b1 | O2b1 |
O-M122 | 26 | VII | 1U | 29 | Eu16 | H6 | L | O3* | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 | O3 |
O-M121 | 26 | VII | 1U | 29 | Eu16 | H6 | L | O3a | O3a | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1 | O3a1a | O3a1a |
O-M164 | 26 | VII | 1U | 29 | Eu16 | H6 | L | O3b | O3b | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a2 | O3a1b | O3a1b |
O-M159 | 13 | VII | 1U | 31 | Eu16 | H6 | L | O3c | O3c | O3a3a | O3a3a | O3a3 | O3a3 | O3a3a | O3a3a | O3a3a | O3a3a | O3a3a |
O-M7 | 26 | VII | 1U | 29 | Eu16 | H7 | L | O3d* | O3c | O3a3b | O3a3b | O3a4 | O3a4 | O3a3b | O3a3b | O3a3b | O3a2b | O3a2b |
O-M113 | 26 | VII | 1U | 29 | Eu16 | H7 | L | O3d1 | O3c1 | O3a3b1 | O3a3b1 | - | O3a4a | O3a3b1 | O3a3b1 | O3a3b1 | O3a2b1 | O3a2b1 |
O-M134 | 26 | VII | 1U | 30 | Eu16 | H8 | L | O3e* | O3d | O3a3c | O3a3c | O3a5 | O3a5 | O3a3c | O3a3c | O3a3c | O3a2c1 | O3a2c1 |
O-M117 | 26 | VII | 1U | 30 | Eu16 | H8 | L | O3e1* | O3d1 | O3a3c1 | O3a3c1 | O3a5a | O3a5a | O3a3c1 | O3a3c1 | O3a3c1 | O3a2c1a | O3a2c1a |
O-M162 | 26 | VII | 1U | 30 | Eu16 | H8 | L | O3e1a | O3d1a | O3a3c1a | O3a3c1a | O3a5a1 | O3a5a1 | O3a3c1a | O3a3c1a | O3a3c1a | O3a2c1a1 | O3a2c1a1 |
The following research teams per their publications were represented in the creation of the YCC tree.
This phylogenetic tree of haplogroup O subclades is based on the YCC 2008 tree ( Karafet 2008 ) and subsequent published research.
Population | Percentage | Count | Source | SNPs |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nias | 100.0% | 60 | Karafet 2010 | P203=52 M110=8 |
Nias | 99.8% | 407 | van Oven 2011 | M119 |
Taiwanese aborigines | 89.6% | 48 | Karafet 2010 | P203=34 M110=9 |
Mentawai | 86.5% | 74 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=42 P203=21 M110=1 |
Aboriginal Taiwanese | 83.4% | 223 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Taiwan (aborigines) | 78.0% | 41 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=18 M110=14 |
Taiwan (aborigines) | 71.8% | 39 | Hurles 2005 | M119(xM50, M101)=15 M50=13 |
Taiwan (aborigines) | 68.9% | 74 | Underhill 2000 | M119(xM101) |
Atayal | 62.5% | 24 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=13 M50/M110/M103=2 |
Utsat (Sanya, Hainan) | 61.1% | 72 | Li 2013 | M119=44 |
Gelao | 60.0% | 30 | [ citation needed ] | M119(xM110)=18 |
Gelong (Hainan) | 57.7% | 78 | [ citation needed ] | M119(xM110)=45 |
Tagalog (Philippine subgroup) | 46.0% | 50 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Kota Kinabalu | 42.1% | 19 | [ citation needed ] | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=6 M50/M110/M103=2 |
Philippines | 41.0% | 39 | Kayser 2006 Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=11 M110=5 |
Mulam (Luocheng) | 40.5% | 42 | [ citation needed ] | P203=13 M110=4 |
Hlai (Jiamao) | 40.0% | 50 | Li et al. 2008 | M119=20 |
Philippines | 35.7% | 28 | Hurles 2005 | M119(xM50, M101)=9 M50=1 |
Dong | 35% | 20 | Xie 2004 | M119(xM110, M50, M103)=5 M110/M50/M103=2 |
Hlai (Zwn) | 32.0% | 75 | Li et al. 2008 | M119=24 |
Sui | 31.5% | 92 | [ citation needed ] | M119(xM110)=29 |
Malaysian | 30.8% | 13 | Su 1999 | M110=3 M119(xM110)=1 |
Dong | 30% | 10 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=2 M50/M110/M103=1 |
Kota Kinabalu | 29.2% | 65 | Hurles 2005 | M119(xM50, M101)=12 M50=6 M101=1 |
Hlai (Moifau) | 28.8% | 66 | Li et al. 2008 | M119=19 |
Trobriand Islands | 28.3% | 53 | Kayser 2006 | M119=15 |
Hlai | 27.3% | 11 | [ citation needed ] | M119(xM110)=3 |
Trobriand Islands | 26.9% | 52 | Kayser 2008 | M110=9 M119(xM110)=5 |
Li (Hlai) | 26.5% | 34 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Malay (near Kuala Lumpur) | 25.0% | 12 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Han (East China) | 24.0% | 167 | Yan 2011 | M119 |
Han Chinese (Taiwan) | 23.1% | 26 | Kayser 2006 | M119=6 |
Hlai (Ha) | 23.0% | 74 | Li et al. 2008 | M119=17 |
Banjarmasin | 22.7% | 22 | Hurles 2005 | M119(xM50, M101)=3 M50=2 |
Java | 22.6% | 53 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=10 M110=2 |
Nusa Tenggara | 22.6% | 31 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=4 M110=3 |
Batak (Sumatra) | 22.2% | 18 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=4 |
China | 22.2% | 36 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=8 |
Balinese | 21.1% | 641 | Karafet 2010 | P203=73 M119(xP203, M110)=57 M110=5 |
Mandar (Sulawesi) | 20.4% | 54 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=7 M110=4 |
Tujia | 20% | - | Su 1999 | - |
Han (Meixian) | 20.0% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Buka | 20.0% | 10 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
CDX (Dai in Xishuangbanna) | 19.2% | 52 | Poznik 2016 | K644/Z23266=7 F656=2 Z23442=1 |
Zhuang (Napo County, Guangxi) | 19.0% | 63 | [ citation needed ] | M119=12 |
Malay | 18.5% | 27 | [ citation needed ] | M50/M110/M103=4 M119(xM50, M110, M103)=1 |
Thin Board Mien | 18.2% | 11 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Majuro (Marshall Islands) | 18.2% | 11 | Hurles 2005 | M50=2 |
Balinese | 18.1% | 551 | Karafet 2005 | M119=100 |
Sui | 18.0% | 50 | Xie 2004 | M119(xM110, M50, M103)=9 |
Zhuang (Guangxi) | 17.9% | 28 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=5 |
Admiralty Islands | 17.7% | 147 | Kayser 2008 | M110=26 |
Malaysia | 17.6% | 17 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=3 |
Sumatra | 17.5% | 57 | Kayser 2006 Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=10 |
Malagasy | 17.1% | 35 | Hurles 2005 | M50 |
Han (South China) | 16.9% | 65 | Yan 2011 | M119 |
Qiang | 15.2% | 33 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Borneo | 15.0% | 40 | Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=5 M110=1 |
Han Chinese | 15% | - | Tajima 2004 | - |
Dai (Dehong, Yunnan) | 15.0% | 20 | Yang 2005 | M119=3 |
Java | 14.8% | 61 | Karafet 2010 | P203=6 M119(xP203, M110)=2 M110=1 |
She | 14.7% | 34 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Han (Chengdu) | 14.7% | 34 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Manus | 14.3% | 7 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Palyu | 13.3% | 30 | Cai 2011 | M119 |
Batak Toba | 13.2% | 38 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=4 P203=1 |
Sumba | 12.6% | 350 | Karafet 2010 | M110=22 M119(xP203, M110)=19 P203=3 |
Micronesia | 12.5% | 16 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=2 |
Guizhou Miao | 12.2% | 49 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Lowland Kimmun | 12.2% | 41 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Thai (Northern Thailand) | 11.8% | 17 | He 2012 | P203(xM101) |
Tai Yong (Northern Thailand) | 11.5% | 26 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=2 M50=1 |
Bunu | 11.1% | 36 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Malaysia | 11.1% | 18 | Kayser 2006 | M119=2 |
Filipinos | 10.4% | 48 | Karafet 2010 | M110=4 P203=1 |
Zhuang | 10% | - | Hammer 2006 | - |
Mountain Straggler Mien | 10.0% | 20 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Northeast Thai | 10.0% | 20 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=1 M50/M110/M103=1 |
Vietnam | 10% | 10 | Kayser 2006 | M119=1 |
Tai Lue (Northern Thailand) | 9.9% | 91 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=6 M50=3 |
Han (China & Taiwan) | 9.7% | 165 | Karafet 2010 | P203=15 M119(xP203, M110)=1 |
Flores | 9.6% | 394 | Karafet 2010 | P203=36 M119(xP203, M110)=2 |
Zhuang (Guangxi) | 9.6% | 166 | Chen 2006 | - |
Han (Taiwan) | 9.5% | 21 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Han (Yili) | 9.4% | 32 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Borneo (Indonesia) | 9.3% | 86 | Karafet 2010 | M110=5 P203=2 M119(xP203, M110)=1 |
Bougainville | 9.2% | 65 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Top Board Mien | 9.1% | 11 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Northern Mien | 9.1% | 33 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Northern She | 8.9% | 56 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Thai (Chiang Mai & Khon Kaen) | 8.8% | 34 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Hui | 8.6% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Mosuo (Ninglang, Yunnan) | 8.5% | 47 | Wen 2004 | M119(xM110) |
Miao (Wenshan, Yunnan) | 8.3% | 48 | Yang 2005 | M119=4 |
Tonga | 8.3% | 12 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=1 |
Tujia (Jishou, Hunan) | 8.2% | 49 | Karafet 2010 | P203=4 |
Hlai (Gei) | 8.1% | 62 | Li et al. 2008 | M119=5 |
Hlai/Cun | 8% | - | Li et al. 2008 | - |
Cambodian | 7.7% | 26 | Su 1999 | M119(xM50, M110, M103)=1 M50/M110/M103=1 |
Ewenki (China) | 7.7% | 26 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Xibe | 7.3% | 41 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Dai (Shuangjiang, Yunnan) | 7.1% | 28 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Hunan Miao | 7.0% | 100 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Tujia | 7% | - | Xie 2004 | - |
Miao (China) | 6.9% | 58 | Karafet 2010 | P203=4 |
Bai (Dali, Yunnan) | 6.7% | 30 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Katu | 6.7% | 45 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Moluccas | 6.7% | 30 | Karafet 2010 | P203=1 M110=1 |
Han (Lanzhou) | 6.7% | 30 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Kinh | 6.7% | 15 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Kinh (Hanoi, Vietnam) | 6.6% | 76 | He 2012 | P203(xM101) |
Southern Mien | 6.5% | 31 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Yao (Malipo, Yunnan) | 6.4% | 47 | Yang 2005 | M119=3 |
Malaysia | 6.3% | 32 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=1 P203=1 |
Dai (Xinping, Yunnan) | 6.1% | 49 | Yang 2005 | M119=3 |
Lisu (Nujiang, Yunnan) | 6.1% | 49 | Yang 2005 | M119=3 |
Yunnan Miao | 6.1% | 49 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Northern Han | 6.1% | 49 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Comorians | 6.0% | 381 | Msaidie 2010 | M50=22 MSY2.2(xM50)=1 |
Bai (Dali, Yunnan) | 6.0% | 50 | Wen 2004 | M119(xM110) |
Bai (Eryuan, Yunnan) | 6.0% | 50 | Yang 2005 | M119=3 |
Moluccas | 5.9% | 34 | Kayser 2006 Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=1 M110=1 |
Kyrgyz (Kyrgyzstan) | 5.8% | 52 | Wells 2001 | M119 |
Vietnam | 5.7% | 70 | Karafet 2010 | P203=4 |
Yao (Liannan, Guangdong) | 5.7% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Fiji | 5.6% | 107 | Kayser 2006 | M119=6 |
Mon (Northern Thailand) | 5.6% | 18 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=1 |
Samoa | 5.6% | 18 | Karafet 2010 | P203=1 |
Thailand | 5.3% | 75 | Trejaut 2014 | P203=2 M119(xP203, M50)=2 |
Daur | 5.1% | 39 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Cham (Binh Thuan, Vietnam) | 5.1% | 59 | He 2012 | M119(xM50) |
Dungan (Kyrgyzstan) | 5.0% | 40 | Wells 2001 | M119 |
Shan (Northern Thailand) | 5.0% | 20 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=1 |
Manchu (Baoshan, Yunnan) | 4.9% | 41 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Han (NE China) | 4.8% | 42 | Katoh 2005 | M119 |
Maewo (Vanuatu) | 4.5% | 44 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=1 M110=1 |
Bouyei | 4.4% | 45 | Xie 2004 | M119(xM110, M50, M103)=2 |
Jino (Xishuangbanna, Yunnan) | 4.4% | 45 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Korean | 4.4% | 45 | Wells 2001 | M119 |
KHV (Kinh in Ho Chi Minh City) | 4.3% | 46 | Poznik 2016 | Z23392(xZ23442)=1 Z23442=1 |
Han (Yuxi, Yunnan) | 4.3% | 47 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Western Mien | 4.3% | 47 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Pumi (Ninglang, Yunnan) | 4.3% | 47 | Wen 2004 | M119(xM110) |
Zhuang (Wenshan, Yunnan) | 4.3% | 47 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Buyi (Luoping, Yunnan) | 4.2% | 48 | Yang 2005 | M119=2 |
Mongolian | 4.2% | 24 | Wells 2001 | M119 |
Tai Khün (Northern Thailand) | 4.2% | 24 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=1 |
Korea | 4.0% | 25 | Kayser 2006 | M119=1 |
Western Samoa | 4.0% | 25 | Hurles 2005 | M119(xM101, M50)=1 |
Khon Mueang (Northern Thailand) | 3.9% | 205 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=6 M50=2 |
Manchu | 3.8% | 52 | Hammer 2006 | M119 |
Koreans (Daejeon) | 3.8% | 133 | Park 2012 | P203=3 M119(xP203, M110)=2 |
New Ireland | 3.7% | 109 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Bo | 3.6% | 28 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Tai Yuan (Thailand) | 3.5% | 85 | Brunelli 2017 | P203=3 |
Japanese | 3.4% | 263 | Nonaka 2007 | M119(xM101, M50) |
Lembata | 3.3% | 92 | Karafet 2010 | M119(xP203, M110)=2 P203=1 |
Korean | 3.2% | 216 | Kim 2007 | M119 |
Samoa | 3.2% | 62 | Kayser 2006 Kayser 2008 | M119(xM110)=2 |
Han (North China) | 3.1% | 129 | Yan 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Papua New Guinea (Highlands) | 3.0% | 33 | Karafet 2010 | P203=1 |
Manchu (NE China) | 3.0% | 101 | Katoh 2005 | M119 |
Koreans (Seoul) | 3.0% | 573 | Park 2012 | P203=16 M119(xP203, M110)=1 |
Dai (Xishuangbanna, Yunnan) | 2.9% | 35 | Yang 2005 | M119=1 |
Manchu | 2.9% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Han (Harbin) | 2.9% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Buyi | 2.9% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
Yao (Bama, Guangxi) | 2.9% | 35 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
West New Britain | 2.8% | 249 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Koreans | 2.7% | 300 | Park 2012 | M119 |
Koreans | 2.7% | 75 | Hammer 2006 | M119 |
Japanese (Kantō) | 2.6% | 117 | Katoh 2005 | M119 |
Koreans (Seoul) | 2.4% | 85 | Katoh 2005 | M119 |
Lavongai | 2.3% | 43 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Koreans (South Korea) | 2.2% | 506 | Kim 2011 | M119 |
Laven | 2.0% | 50 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
Yi (Shuangbai, Yunnan) | 2.0% | 50 | Wen 2004 | M119(xM110) |
Hmong Daw (Laos) | 2.0% | 51 | Cai 2011 | M119(xM110) |
She | 2.0% | 51 | Karafet 2010 | P203=1 |
Japanese (Kyushu) | 1.9% | 104 | Tajima 2004 | M119 |
Vanuatu | 1.9% | 52 | Hurles 2005 | M50=1 |
Yao (Guangxi) | 1.7% | 60 | Karafet 2010 | P203=1 |
Uygur | 1.4% | 70 | Xue 2006 | M119 |
East New Britain | 1.4% | 145 | Scheinfeldt 2006 | M119 |
Japanese | 1.2% | 2390 | Sato 2014 | M119 |
Tuvalu | 1.0% | 100 | Kayser 2008 | M110=1 |
Mongolia (mostly Khalkh) | 0.7% | 149 | Hammer 2006 | M119 |
Mongols (Mongolia) | 0.6% | 160 | Di Cristofaro 2013 | M119 |
Lawa (Northern Thailand) | 0.0% | 50 | Brunelli 2017 | M119=0 |
Haplogroup C is a major Y-chromosome haplogroup, defined by UEPs M130/RPS4Y711, P184, P255, and P260, which are all SNP mutations. It is one of two primary branches of Haplogroup CF alongside Haplogroup F. Haplogroup C is found in ancient populations on every continent except Africa and is the predominant Y-DNA haplogroup among males belonging to many peoples indigenous to East Asia, Central Asia, Siberia, North America and Australia as well as a some populations in Europe, the Levant, and later Japan.
Haplogroup D1 or D-M174 is a subclade of haplogroup D-CTS3946. This male haplogroup is found primarily in East Asia, Magar-ethnic Nepal and the Andaman Islands. It is also found regularly with lower frequency in Central Asia, Siberia and Mainland Southeast Asia, and, more rarely, in Europe and the Middle East.
Haplogroup K or K-M9 is a genetic lineage within human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. A sublineage of haplogroup IJK, K-M9, and its descendant clades represent a geographically widespread and diverse haplogroup. The lineages have long been found among males on every continent except Antarctica.
Haplogroup M, also known as M-P256 and Haplogroup K2b1b is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. M-P256 is a descendant haplogroup of Haplogroup K2b1, and is believed to have first appeared between 32,000 and 47,000 years ago.
Haplogroup N (M231) is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup defined by the presence of the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker M231.
Haplogroup O, also known as O-M175, is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is primarily found among populations in Southeast Asia and East Asia. It also is found in various percentages of populations of the Russian Far East, South Asia, Central Asia, Caucasus, Crimea, Ukraine, Iran, Oceania, Madagascar and the Comoros. Haplogroup O is a primary descendant of haplogroup NO-M214.
Haplogroup O-M122 is an Eastern Eurasian Y-chromosome haplogroup. The lineage ranges across Southeast Asia and East Asia, where it dominates the paternal lineages with extremely high frequencies. It is also significantly present in Central Asia, especially among the Naiman tribe of Kazakhs.
Haplogroup Q or Q-M242 is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It has one primary subclade, Haplogroup Q1 (L232/S432), which includes numerous subclades that have been sampled and identified in males among modern populations.
In human genetics, Haplogroup O-M268, also known as O1b, is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. Haplogroup O-M268 is a primary subclade of haplogroup O-F265, itself a primary descendant branch of Haplogroup O-M175.
Haplogroup C-M217, also known as C2, is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is the most frequently occurring branch of the wider Haplogroup C (M130). It is found mostly in Central Asia, Eastern Siberia and significant frequencies in parts of East Asia and Southeast Asia including some populations in the Caucasus, Middle East, South Asia, East Europe. It is found in a much more widespread area with a low frequency of less than 2%.
Haplogroup S-M230, also known as S1a1b, is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. It is by far the most numerically significant subclade of Haplogroup S1a.
Haplogroup E-P147 is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. Haplogroup E-P147, along with the less common haplogroup E-M75, is one of the two main branches of the older haplogroup E-M96. The E-P147 clade is commonly observed throughout Africa and is divided into two subclades: the less common, haplogroup E-M132, and the more common, haplogroup E-P177.
Haplogroup E-P177 is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. E-P177 has two known subclades, which are haplogroup E-P2 and haplogroup E-P75.
Haplogroup E-M75 is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. Along with haplogroup E-P147, it is one of the two main branches of the older haplogroup E-M96.
Haplogroup E-P2, also known as E1b1, is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. E-P2 has two basal branches, E-V38 and E-M215. E-P2 had an ancient presence in East Africa and the Levant; presently, it is primarily distributed in Africa where it may have originated, and occurs at lower frequencies in the Middle East and Europe.
In human population genetics, Y-Chromosome haplogroups define the major lineages of direct paternal (male) lines back to a shared common ancestor in Africa. Men in the same haplogroup share a set of differences, or markers, on their Y-Chromosome, which distinguish them from men in other haplogroups. These UEPs, or markers used to define haplogroups, are SNP mutations. Y-Chromosome Haplogroups all form "family trees" or "phylogenies", with both branches or sub-clades diverging from a common haplogroup ancestor, and also with all haplogroups themselves linked into one family tree which traces back ultimately to the most recent shared male line ancestor of all men alive today, called in popular science Y Chromosome Adam.
The tables below provide statistics on the human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroups most commonly found among ethnolinguistic groups and populations from East and South-East Asia.
Haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117 or Haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117 is a subclade of O2a2b1-M134 that occurs frequently in China and in neighboring countries like Bhutan, Nepal, and Korea, also found among Sino-Tibetan language speaking people.
Various genetic studies on Filipinos have been performed, to analyze the population genetics of the various ethnic groups in the Philippines.
Haplogroup E-M329, also known as E1b1a2, is a human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup. E-M329 is mostly found in East Africa.
Websites