![]() A Raptor 1 rocket engine ready for transport outside SpaceX's factory in Hawthorne, California | |
Country of origin | ![]() |
---|---|
Manufacturer | SpaceX |
Associated LV | SpaceX Starship |
Status | In production |
Liquid-fuel engine | |
Propellant | LOX / CH4 |
Mixture ratio | 3.6 (78% O2, 22% CH4) [1] [2] |
Cycle | Full-flow staged combustion |
Pumps | 2 turbopumps |
Configuration | |
Chamber | 1 |
Nozzle ratio | |
Performance | |
Thrust | Raptor 1: 185 tf (1.81 MN; 408,000 lbf) [5] Raptor 2: Raptor 3: 280 tf (2.75 MN; 617,000 lbf) |
Throttle range | 40–100% [8] |
Thrust-to-weight ratio | Raptor 1: 88.94 Raptor 2: 141.1 Raptor 3: 183.6 |
Chamber pressure |
|
Specific impulse, vacuum | 380 s (3.7 km/s) [9] |
Specific impulse, sea-level | 327 s (3.21 km/s) [10] |
Mass flow | |
Burn time | Varies |
Dimensions | |
Length | 3.1 m (10 ft) [13] |
Diameter | 1.3 m (4 ft 3 in) [14] |
Dry mass | Raptor 1: 2,080 kg (4,590 lb) Raptor 2: 1,630 kg (3,590 lb) Raptor 3: 1,525 kg (3,362 lb) |
Raptor is a family of rocket engines developed and manufactured by SpaceX. It is the third rocket engine in history designed with a full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) fuel cycle, and the first such engine to power a vehicle in flight. [15] The engine is powered by cryogenic liquid methane and liquid oxygen, a mixture known as methalox.
SpaceX's super-heavy-lift Starship uses Raptor engines in its Super Heavy booster and in the Starship second stage. [16] Starship missions include lifting payloads to Earth orbit and is also planned for missions to the Moon and Mars. [17] The engines are being designed for reuse with little maintenance. [18]
Raptor is designed for extreme reliability, aiming to support airline-level of safety required by the point-to-point Earth transportation market. [19] Gwynne Shotwell claimed that Raptor would be able to deliver "long life... and more benign turbine environments". [20] [21]
Raptor is powered by subcooled liquid methane and subcooled liquid oxygen in a full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) cycle. FFSC is a twin-shaft staged combustion cycle that uses both oxidizer-rich and fuel-rich preburners. The cycle allows for the full flow of both propellants through the turbines without dumping any unburnt propellant overboard.
FFSC is a departure from the more common "open-cycle" gas generator system and LOX/kerosene propellants used by its predecessor Merlin. [22] Before 2014, no FFSC had ever been used in an actual flight and only two FFSC designs had progressed sufficiently to reach test stands: the Soviet RD-270 project in the 1960s and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Integrated Powerhead Demonstrator in the mid-2000s. [15] [23] [21] [24] RS-25 engines (first used on the Space Shuttle) used a simpler form of staged combustion cycle. [25] Several Russian rocket engines, including the RD-180 [22] and the RD-191 did as well. [21]
FFSC has the advantage that the energy produced by the preburners, and used to power the propellant pumps, is spread among the entire fuel flow, meaning that the preburner exhaust driving the propellant turbopumps is as cool as possible, even cooler than other closed engine cycles that only preburn one propellant. This contributes to a long engine life. In contrast, an open-cycle engine in which the preburner exhaust bypasses the main combustion chamber tries to minimize the amount of propellant fed through the preburner, which is achieved by operating the turbine at its maximum survivable temperature.
An oxygen-rich turbine powers an oxygen turbopump, and a fuel-rich turbine powers a methane turbopump. Both oxidizer and fuel streams are converted completely to the gas phase before they enter the combustion chamber. [15] This speeds up mixing and combustion, reducing the size and mass of the required combustion chamber. Torch igniters are used in the preburners. Raptor 2's main combustion chamber uses an undisclosed ignition method that is allegedly less complex, lighter, cheaper, and more reliable than Merlin's. Engine ignition in Raptor Vacuum is handled by dual-redundant spark-plug lit torch igniters, [26] which eliminate the need for Merlin's dedicated, consumable igniter fluid. [21] Raptor 2 uses coaxial swirl injectors to admit propellants to the combustion chamber, rather than Merlin's pintle injectors. [27] [28]
Raptor is designed for deep cryogenic propellants—fluids cooled to near their freezing points, rather than their boiling points, as is typical for cryogenic rocket engines. [29] Subcooled propellants are denser, increasing propellant mass [30] as well as engine performance. Specific impulse is increased, and the risk of cavitation at inputs to the turbopumps is reduced due to the higher propellant fuel mass flow rate per unit of power generated. [21] Cavitation (bubbles) reduces fuel flow/pressure and can starve the engine, while eroding turbine blades. [31] The oxidizer to fuel ratio of the engine is approximately 3.8 to 1. [32] Methalox burns relatively cleanly, reducing carbon build-up in the engine.
Liquid methane and oxygen propellants have been adopted by many companies, such as Blue Origin with its BE-4 engine, as well as Chinese startup Space Epoch's Longyun-70. [33]
Many components of early Raptor prototypes were manufactured using 3D printing, including turbopumps and injectors, increasing the speed of development and testing. [29] [34] The 2016 subscale development engine had 40% (by mass) of its parts manufactured by 3D printing. [21] In 2019, engine manifolds were cast from SpaceX's in-house developed SX300 Inconel superalloy, later changed to SX500. [35]
SpaceX's Merlin and Kestrel rocket engines use a RP-1 and liquid oxygen ("kerolox") combination. Raptor has about triple the thrust of SpaceX's Merlin 1D engine, which powers the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles.
Raptor was conceived to burn hydrogen and oxygen propellants as of 2009. [36] SpaceX had a few staff working on the Raptor upper-stage engine at a low priority in 2011. [37] [38]
In October 2012, SpaceX announced concept work on an engine that would be "several times as powerful as the Merlin 1 series of engines, and won't use Merlin's RP-1 fuel". [39]
In November 2012, Musk announced that SpaceX was working on methane-fueled rocket engines, that Raptor would be methane-based, [40] and that methane would fuel Mars colonization. [24] Because of the presence of underground water and carbon dioxide in Mars atmosphere, methane, a simple hydrocarbon, could be synthesized on Mars using the Sabatier reaction. [41] NASA found in-situ resource production on Mars to be viable for oxygen, water, and methane production. [42]
In early 2014 SpaceX confirmed that Raptor would be used for both first and second stages of its next rocket. This held as the design evolved from the Mars Colonial Transporter [24] to the Interplanetary Transport System, [43] the Big Falcon Rocket, and ultimately, Starship. [44]
The concept evolved from a family of Raptor -designated rocket engines (2012) [45] to focus on the full-size Raptor engine (2014). [46]
In January 2016, the US Air Force awarded a US$33.6 million development contract to SpaceX to develop a prototype Raptor for use on the upper stage of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. [47] [48]
The first version was intended to operate at a chamber pressure of 250 bars (25 MPa; 3,600 psi). [49] As of July 2022, chamber pressure had reached 300 bars in a test. [31] In April 2024, Musk shared the performance achieved by SpaceX with the Raptor 1 engine (sea level 185 tf, Rvac 200 tf) and Raptor 2 engine (sea level 230 tf, Rvac 258 tf) along with the target specifications for the upcoming Raptor 3 (sea level 280 tf, Rvac 306 tf) [50] [51] and said SpaceX would aim to ultimately achieve over 330 tonnes of thrust on the sea-level booster engines. [52]
Raptor 1 and 2 engines require a heat shroud to protect pipes and wiring from engine heat, [31] while Raptor 3 is planned to no longer need a heat shield. [52] : 18:30
Initial development testing [53] of Raptor components was done at NASA's Stennis Space Center, [17] [54] beginning in April 2014. Testing focused on startup and shutdown procedures, as well as hardware characterization and verification. [21]
SpaceX began testing injectors in 2014 and tested an oxygen preburner in 2015. 76 hot-fire tests of the preburner, totaling some 400 seconds of test time, were executed from April-August. [53]
By early 2016, SpaceX had constructed an engine test stand at their McGregor test site in central Texas for Raptor testing. [21] [17] The first Raptor was manufactured at the SpaceX Hawthorne facility in California. By August 2016 it was shipped to McGregor for development testing. [55] The engine had 1 MN (220,000 lbf) thrust. [56] It was the first-ever FFSC methalox engine to reach a test stand. [21]
A subscale development engine was used for design validation. It was one-third the size of the engine designs that were envisioned for flight vehicles. [21] It featured 200 bars (20 MPa; 2,900 psi) of chamber pressure, with a thrust of 1 meganewton (220,000 lbf) and used the SpaceX-designed SX500 alloy, created to contain hot oxygen gas in the engine at up to 12,000 pounds per square inch (830 bar; 83 MPa). [57] It was tested on a ground test stand in McGregor, firing briefly. [21] To eliminate flow separation problems while testing in Earth's atmosphere, the test nozzle expansion ratio was limited to 150. [21]
By September 2017, the subscale engine had completed 1200 seconds of firings across 42 tests. [58]
SpaceX completed many static fire tests on a vehicle using Raptor 2s, including a 31 engine test (intended to be 33) on 9 February 2023, [59] and a 33 engine test on 25 August 2023. [60] During testing, more than 50 chambers melted, and more than 20 engines exploded. [31]
SpaceX completed its first integrated flight test of Starship on 20 April 2023. The rocket had 33 Raptor 2 engines, but three of those were shut down before the rocket lifted off from the launch mount. The flight test was terminated after climbing to an altitude of ~39 km over the Gulf of Mexico. Multiple engines were out before the flight termination system (FTS) destroyed the booster and ship. [61]
On the second integrated flight test all 33 booster engines remained lit until boostback burn startup, and all six Starship engines remained lit until the FTS was activated. [62] [63]
On the third integrated flight test, all 33 booster engines once again remained lit until main engine cutoff (MECO), and then following hot-staging, 13 successfully relit to perform a boostback for full duration. [64] On the booster's landing burn, only 3 engines of the planned 13 lit, with 2 shutting down rapidly, the other remained lit until a rapid unscheduled disassembly (RUD) occurred ~462 metres above sea level. [64] The ship successfully kept all 6 engines lit until second stage / secondary engine cutoff (SECO) without issues, however a planned in-space raptor re-light was cancelled due to rolling during coast. [64]
In November 2016, Raptor was projected to power the proposed Interplanetary Transport System (ITS), in the early 2020s. [21] Musk discussed two engines: a sea-level variant (expansion ratio 40:1) with thrust of 3,050 kN (690,000 lbf) at sea level for the first stage/booster, and a vacuum variant (expansion ratio 200:1) with thrust of 3,285 kN (738,000 lbf) in space. 42 sea-level engines were envisioned in the high-level design of the first stage. [21]
Three gimbaled sea-level Raptor engines would be used for landing the second stage. Six additional, non-gimbaled, vacuum-optimized Raptors (Raptor Vacuum) would provide primary thrust for the second stage, for a total of nine engines. [65] [21] Raptor Vacuums were envisioned to contribute a specific impulse of 382 s (3,750 m/s), using a much larger nozzle. [66]
In September 2017 Musk said that a smaller Raptor engine—with slightly over half as much thrust as the previous designs—would be used on the next-generation rocket, a 9 m (30 ft)-diameter launch vehicle termed Big Falcon Rocket (BFR) and later renamed Starship. [67] The redesign was aimed at Earth-orbit and cislunar missions so that the new system might pay for itself, in part, through economic spaceflight activities in the near-Earth space zone. [68] With the much smaller launch vehicle, fewer Raptor engines would be needed. BFR was then slated to have 31 Raptors on the first stage and 6 on the second stage. [69] [21]
By mid-2018, SpaceX was publicly stating that the sea-level Raptor was expected to have 1,700 kN (380,000 lbf) thrust at sea level with a specific impulse of 330 s (3,200 m/s), with a nozzle exit diameter of 1.3 m (4.3 ft). Raptor Vacuum would have specific impulse of 356 s (3,490 m/s) in vacuum [58] and was expected to exert 1,900 kN (430,000 lbf) force with a specific impulse of 375 s (3,680 m/s), using a nozzle exit diameter of 2.4 m (7.9 ft). [58]
In the BFR update given in September 2018, Musk showed a video of a 71-second fire test of a Raptor engine, and stated that "this is Raptor that will power BFR, both the ship and the booster; it's the same engine. [...] approximately a 200 (metric) tons engine aiming for roughly 300 bar chamber pressure. [...] If you had it at a high expansion ratio, has the potential to have a specific impulse of 380." [10] SpaceX aimed at a lifetime of 1000 flights. [70]
In January 2016, the United States Air Force (USAF) awarded a US$33.6 million development contract to SpaceX to develop a Raptor prototype for use on the upper stage of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. The contract required double-matching funding by SpaceX of at least US$67.3 million. [47] [71] Engine testing was planned for NASA's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi under US Air Force supervision. [47] [48] The USAF contract called for a single prototype engine and ground tests. [47]
In October 2017 USAF awarded a US$40.8 million modification contract for a Raptor prototype for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program. [72] It was to use liquid methane and liquid oxygen, propellants, a full-flow staged combustion cycle, and to be reusable. [48]
In July 2021, SpaceX announced a second Raptor production facility, in central Texas near the existing rocket engine test facility. The facility would concentrate on serial production of Raptor 2, while the California facility would produce Raptor Vacuum and new/experimental Raptor designs. The new facility was expected to eventually produce 800 to 1000 rocket engines each year. [73] [74] In 2019 the (marginal) cost of the engine was stated to be approaching US$1 million. SpaceX planned to mass-produce up to 500 Raptor engines per year, each costing less than US$250,000. [75]
Raptor has evolved significantly since it was revealed.
Rocket | Mass (kg) | Thrust (t) | Chamber Pressure (bar) | Specific Impulse (s) | TW Engine Only |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor 1 | 2000 | 185 | 250 | 330 | 93 |
Raptor 2 | 1600 | 230 | 300 | 327 | 144 |
Raptor 3 | 1400 | 269 | 350 | 327 | 192 |
Raptor 3.1 | 1400 | 276 | 370 | 327 | 197 |
Raptor 3.2 | 1400 | 300 | 400 | 327 | 214 |
Raptor X | 1200 | 320 | 450 | 327 | 292 |
Raptor Vacuum [77] (RVac) is a variant of Raptor with an extended, regeneratively-cooled nozzle for higher specific impulse in space. The vacuum-optimized Raptor targets a specific impulse of ~380 s (3,700 m/s). [9] A full-duration test of version 1 of Raptor Vacuum was completed in September 2020 at McGregor. [77] The first in-flight ignition of a Raptor Vacuum was on S25 during the second integrated flight test. [63]
Raptor 2 is a complete redesign of the Raptor 1 engine. [78] The turbomachinery, chamber, nozzle, and electronics were all redesigned. Many flanges were converted to welds, while other parts were deleted. [79] Simplifications continued after production began. On 10 February 2022, Musk showed Raptor 2 capabilities and design improvements. [79] [80]
By 18 December 2021, Raptor 2 had started production. [81] By November 2022, SpaceX produced more than one Raptor a day and had created a stockpile for future launches. [82] Raptor 2s are produced at SpaceX's McGregor engine development facility.
Raptor 2s were achieving 230 tf (510,000 lbf ) of thrust consistently by February 2022. Musk indicated that production costs were approximately half that of Raptor 1. [79]
Raptor 3 is aimed to ultimately achieve 330 tf (3.2 MN ) of thrust in the booster/sea-level configuration. [51] As of August 2024, it had reached 269 tf. It weighs 1400 kg. Chamber pressure reached 350 bar. [76]
Another goal is to eliminate protective engine shrouds. [52] Raptor 3 moves much of the plumbing and sensors into the housing wall. [50] On 2 August 2024, Raptor 3 SN1 was revealed. [83]
Raptor 3 engines do not require a heat shield. Integral cooling and integral secondary flow circuits run through the walls of various sections of the engine. Many bolted joints in Raptor 2 have been eliminated/replaced by single parts. Servicing is more difficult because some parts lie beneath welded joints. [84] : 42:19–45:50
In October 2021, SpaceX initiated an effort to develop a conceptual design for a new rocket engine with the goal of keeping cost below US$1,000 per ton of thrust. The project was called the 1337 engine, to be pronounced "LEET" (after a coding meme). [82]
Although the initial design effort was halted in late 2021, the project helped define an ideal engine, and likely generated ideas that were incorporated into Raptor 3. Musk stated then that "We can't make life multiplanetary with Raptor, as it is way too expensive, but Raptor is needed to tide us over until 1337 is ready." [82]
As of 2024 [update] , the LEET concept was clarified as a total tearup of the Raptor 3 design, although Musk stated that SpaceX will "probably do that at some point. ... [Raptor 3] looks like a LEET engine, but its way more expensive because it still has printed parts, for example." [84]
Engine | Rockets | Thrust | Specific impulse, vacuum | Thrust-to- weight ratio | Propellant | Cycle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raptor sea-level | Starship | 2,637 kN (593,000 lbf) [76] | 327 s (3,210 m/s) [76] | 200 | LCH 4 / LOX | Full-flow staged combustion |
Raptor vacuum | 380 s (3,700 m/s) [9] | 120 (at maximum) | ||||
Merlin 1D sea-level | Falcon booster stage | 914 kN (205,000 lbf) | 311 s (3,050 m/s) [85] | 176 [86] | RP-1 / LOX | Gas generator |
Merlin 1D vacuum | Falcon upper stage | 934 kN (210,000 lbf) [87] | 348 s (3,410 m/s) [87] | 180 [86] | ||
Blue Origin BE-4 | New Glenn, Vulcan | 2,400 kN (550,000 lbf) [88] | 339 s (3,320 m/s) [89] | LCH 4 / LOX | Oxidizer-rich staged combustion | |
Energomash RD-170/171M | Energia, Zenit, Soyuz-5 | 7,904 kN (1,777,000 lbf) [90] | 337.2 s (3,307 m/s) [90] | 79.57 [90] | RP-1 / LOX | |
Energomash RD-180 | Atlas III, Atlas V | 4,152 kN (933,000 lbf) [91] | 338 s (3,310 m/s) [91] | 78.44 [91] | ||
Energomash RD-191/181 | Angara, Antares | 2,090 kN (470,000 lbf) [92] | 337.5 s (3,310 m/s) [92] | 89 [92] | ||
Kuznetsov NK-33 | N1, Soyuz-2-1v | 1,638 kN (368,000 lbf) [93] | 331 s (3,250 m/s) [93] | 136.66 [93] | ||
Energomash RD-275M | Proton-M | 1,832 kN (412,000 lbf) | 315.8 s (3,097 m/s) | 174.5 | N2O4 / UDMH | |
Rocketdyne RS-25 | Space Shuttle, SLS | 2,280 kN (510,000 lbf) | 453 s (4,440 m/s) [94] | 73 [95] | LH2 / LOX | Fuel-rich staged combustion |
Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-68A | Delta IV | 3,560 kN (800,000 lbf) | 414 s (4,060 m/s) | 51 [96] | LH2 / LOX | Gas generator |
Rocketdyne F-1 | Saturn V | 7,740 kN (1,740,000 lbf) | 304 s (2,980 m/s) [97] | 83 | RP-1 / LOX | Gas generator |
Merlin is a family of rocket engines developed by SpaceX. They are currently a part of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles, and were formerly used on the Falcon 1. Merlin engines use RP-1 and liquid oxygen as rocket propellants in a gas-generator power cycle. The Merlin engine was originally designed for sea recovery and reuse, but since 2016 the entire Falcon 9 booster is recovered for reuse by landing vertically on a landing pad using one of its nine Merlin engines.
The highest specific impulse chemical rockets use liquid propellants. They can consist of a single chemical or a mix of two chemicals, called bipropellants. Bipropellants can further be divided into two categories; hypergolic propellants, which ignite when the fuel and oxidizer make contact, and non-hypergolic propellants which require an ignition source.
The staged combustion cycle is a power cycle of a bipropellant rocket engine. In the staged combustion cycle, propellant flows through multiple combustion chambers, and is thus combusted in stages. The main advantage relative to other rocket engine power cycles is high fuel efficiency, measured through specific impulse, while its main disadvantage is engineering complexity.
Falcon Heavy is a heavy-lift launch vehicle with partial reusability that can carry cargo into Earth orbit, and beyond. It is designed, manufactured and launched by American aerospace company SpaceX.
SpaceX manufactures launch vehicles to operate its launch provider services and to execute its various exploration goals. SpaceX currently manufactures and operates the Falcon 9 Block 5 family of medium-lift launch vehicles and the Falcon Heavy family of heavy-lift launch vehicles – both of which are powered by SpaceX Merlin engines and employ VTVL technologies to reuse the first stage. As of 2024, the company is also developing the fully reusable Starship launch system, which will replace the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
SpaceX has privately funded the development of orbital launch systems that can be reused many times, similar to the reusability of aircraft. SpaceX has developed technologies over the last decade to facilitate full and rapid reuse of space launch vehicles. The project's long-term objectives include returning a launch vehicle first stage to the launch site within minutes and to return a second stage to the launch pad, following orbital realignment with the launch site and atmospheric reentry in up to 24 hours. SpaceX's long term goal would have been reusability of both stages of their orbital launch vehicle, and the first stage would be designed to allow reuse a few hours after return. Development of reusable second stages for Falcon 9 was later abandoned in favor of developing Starship, however, SpaceX developed reusable payload fairings for the Falcon 9.
Since the founding of SpaceX in 2002, the company has developed four families of rocket engines — Merlin, Kestrel, Draco and SuperDraco — and since 2016 developed the Raptor methane rocket engine and after 2020, a line of methalox thrusters.
Starbase is an industrial complex for Starship rockets and the headquarters of the American aerospace manufacturer company SpaceX. Located near Brownsville, Texas, United States, it has been under construction since the late 2010s by SpaceX. Starbase is composed of a spaceport near the Gulf of Mexico, a production facility at the Boca Chica village, and a small structure test site along the Texas State Highway 4.
SpaceX Mars colonization program is a planned objective of the company SpaceX and particularly of its founder Elon Musk to colonize Mars. The main element of this ambition is the plan to establish a self-sustained large scale settlement and colony on Mars, claiming self-determination under direct democracy. The main motivation behind this is the belief that the colonization of Mars allows humanity to become multiplanetary and therefore secures the long-term survival of the human species in case of Earth being rid of human life.
As of 2023, SpaceX operates four launch facilities: Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40), Vandenberg Space Force Base Space Launch Complex 4E (SLC-4E), Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A), and Brownsville South Texas Launch Site (Starbase). Space Launch Complex 40 was damaged in the AMOS-6 accident in September 2016 and repair work was completed by December 2017. SpaceX believes that they can optimize their launch operations, and reduce launch costs, by dividing their launch missions amongst these four launch facilities: LC-39A for NASA launches, SLC-40 for United States Space Force national security launches, SLC-4E for polar launches, and South Texas Launch Site for commercial launches.
Falcon 9 Full Thrust is a partially reusable, two-stage-to-orbit, medium-lift launch vehicle designed and manufactured in the United States by SpaceX. It is the third major version of the Falcon 9 family, designed starting in 2014, with its first launch operations in December 2015. It was later refined into the Block 4 configuration. The rocket made 36 successful launches with no failures, although it did experience one pre-flight failure (AMOS-6),
Starship is a two-stage fully reusable super heavy-lift launch vehicle under development by SpaceX. As of July 2024, it is the most massive and powerful vehicle ever to fly. SpaceX has developed Starship with the intention of lowering launch costs using economies of scale. SpaceX aims to achieve this by reusing both rocket stages, increasing payload mass to orbit, increasing launch frequency, creating a mass-manufacturing pipeline and adapting it to a wide range of space missions. Starship is the latest project in SpaceX's reusable launch system development program and plan to colonize Mars.
Falcon 9 Block 5 is a partially reusable, human-rated, two-stage-to-orbit, medium-lift launch vehicle designed and manufactured in the United States by SpaceX. It is the fifth major version of the Falcon 9 family and the third version of the Falcon 9 Full Thrust. It is powered by Merlin 1D engines burning rocket-grade kerosene (RP-1) and liquid oxygen (LOX).
SpaceX Starship flight tests include fifteen launches to date of prototype rockets during 2019–2024 for the SpaceX Starship launch vehicle development program. Eleven test flights were of single-stage Starship spacecraft flying low-altitude tests (2019–2021), while four were orbital trajectory flights of the entire Starship launch vehicle (2023–2024), consisting of a Starship spacecraft second-stage prototype atop a Super Heavy first-stage booster prototype. None of the flights to date has carried an operational payload. Additional flight tests are planned in 2024.
Archimedes is a liquid-fuel rocket engine burning liquid oxygen and liquid methane in an oxidizer-rich staged combustion cycle. It is designed by aerospace company Rocket Lab for its Neutron rocket.
Starship flight test 1 was the maiden flight of the integrated SpaceX Starship launch vehicle. SpaceX performed the flight test on April 20, 2023. The prototype vehicle was destroyed less than four minutes after lifting off from the SpaceX Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas. The vehicle became the most powerful rocket ever flown, breaking the half-century-old record held by the Soviet Union's N1 rocket. The launch was the first "integrated flight test," meaning it was the first time that both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship spacecraft flew together as a fully integrated Starship launch vehicle.
Super Heavy is the first stage of the SpaceX Starship super heavy-lift launch vehicle, which it composes in combination with the Starship second-stage. As of 2024, Super Heavy prototypes are being flight tested. Super Heavy flew for the first time on April 20, 2023, during the first orbital launch attempt of the Starship rocket.
Starship is a spacecraft and second stage under development by American aerospace company SpaceX. Stacked atop its booster, the Super Heavy, the pair compose SpaceX's new super heavy-lift space vehicle, also called Starship. The spacecraft is designed to transport both crew and cargo to a variety of destinations, including Earth orbit, the Moon, and Mars. It is intended to enable long duration interplanetary flights with a crew of up to 100 people. It will also be capable of point-to-point transport on Earth, enabling travel to anywhere in the world in less than an hour. Furthermore, the spacecraft will be used to refuel other Starship spacecraft, enabling them to reach higher orbits and other space destinations. Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX, estimated in a tweet that 8 launches would be needed to completely refuel a Starship in low Earth orbit, extrapolating this from Starship's payload to orbit and how much fuel a fully fueled Starship contains. To land on bodies without an atmosphere, such as the Moon, Starship will fire its engines and thrusters to perform a controlled descent.
Before settling on the 2018 Starship design, SpaceX successively presented a number of reusable super-heavy lift vehicle proposals. These preliminary spacecraft designs were known under various names.
Starship flight test 2 was the second flight test of the SpaceX Starship launch vehicle. SpaceX performed the flight test on November 18, 2023. The mission's primary objectives were for the vehicle to hot stage—a new addition to Starship's flight profile—followed by the second stage attaining a near-orbital trajectory with a controlled reentry over the Pacific Ocean, while the booster does a boostback burn with a propulsive splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.
The nominal operating condition for the Raptor engine is an injector face stagnation pressure (Pc) of 3669.5 psia and a somewhat fuel-rich engine O/F mixture ratio (MR) of 3.60. The current analysis was performed for the 100% nominal engine operating pressure (Pc=3669.5 psia) and an engine MR of 3.60.
Super Heavy is expected to be equipped with up to 37 Raptor engines, and Starship will employ up to six Raptor engines. The Raptor engine is powered by liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane (LCH4) in a 3.6:1 mass ratio, respectively.
The subject engine uses a closed power cycle with a 34.34:1 regeneratively-cooled thrust chamber nozzle.
And this is the Raptor engine that will power BFR both the ship and the booster, it's the same engine. And this is approximately a 200-ton thrust engine that's aiming for roughly a 300-bar or 300-atmosphere chamber pressure. And if you have it at a high expansion ratio it has the potential to have a specific impulse of 380.
SpaceX's Starship system represents a fully reusable transportation system designed to service Earth orbit needs as well as missions to the Moon and Mars. This two-stage vehicle — composed of the Super Heavy rocket (booster) and Starship (spacecraft)
[initial flight testing will be with] a full-scale ship doing short hops of a few hundred kilometers altitude and lateral distance ... fairly easy on the vehicle, as no heat shield is needed, we can have a large amount of reserve propellant and don't need the high area ratio, deep space Raptor engines. ... 'The engine thrust dropped roughly in proportion to the vehicle mass reduction from the first IAC talk,' Musk wrote when asked about that reduction in thrust. The reduction in thrust also allows for the use of multiple engines, giving the vehicle an engine-out capability for landings. ... Musk was optimistic about scaling up the Raptor engine from its current developmental model to the full-scale one. 'Thrust scaling is the easy part. Very simple to scale the dev Raptor to 170 tons,' he wrote. 'The flight engine design is much lighter and tighter, and is extremely focused on reliability.' He added the goal is to achieve 'passenger airline levels of safety' with the engine, required if the vehicle is to serve point-to-point transportation markets.
SpaceX has already begun self-funded development and testing on our next-generation Raptor engine. ... Raptor development ... will not require external development funds related to this engine.
Musk said Lox and methane would be SpaceX's propellants of choice on a mission to Mars, which has long been his stated goal. SpaceX's initial work will be to build a Lox/methane rocket for a future upper stage, codenamed Raptor. The design of this engine would be a departure from the "open cycle" gas generator system that the current Merlin 1 engine series uses. Instead, the new rocket engine would use a much more efficient "staged combustion" cycle that many Russian rocket engines use.
Raptor uses those spark plugs to ignite its ignition sources [forming] full-up blow torches ... —likely miniature rocket engines using the same methane and oxygen fuel as Raptor—then ignite the engine's methane and oxygen preburners before finally igniting those mixed, high-pressure gases in the combustion chamber.
Musk: "The critical elements of the solution are rocket reusability and low cost propellant (CH4 and O2 at an O/F ratio of ~3.8). And, of course, making the return propellant on Mars, which has a handy CO2 atmosphere and lots of H2O frozen in the soil."
"We are going to do methane." Musk announced as he described his future plans for reusable launch vehicles including those designed to take astronauts to Mars within 15 years, "The energy cost of methane is the lowest and it has a slight Isp (Specific Impulse) advantage over Kerosene," said Musk adding, "And it does not have the pain in the ass factor that hydrogen has".
Musk stated it's possible that the first spaceship would be ready for tests in four years... 'We're kind of being intentionally fuzzy about the timeline,' he said. 'We're going to try and make as much progress as we can with a very constrained budget.'
The new Raptor upper stage engine is likely to be only the first engine in a series of lox/methane engines.
our focus is the full Raptor size
this project is strictly private industry development for commercial use
the updated version of the Mars architecture: Because it has evolved quite a bit since that last talk. ... The key thing that I figured out is how do you pay for it? If we downsize the Mars vehicle, make it capable of doing Earth-orbit activity as well as Mars activity, maybe we can pay for it by using it for Earth-orbit activity. That is one of the key elements in the new architecture. It is similar to what was shown at IAC, but a little bit smaller. Still big, but this one has a shot at being real on the economic front.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Hawthorne, California, has been awarded a $40,766,512 modification (P00007) for the development of the Raptor rocket propulsion system prototype for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program. Work will be performed at NASA Stennis Space Center, Mississippi; Hawthorne, California; McGregor, Texas; and Los Angeles Air Force Base, California; and is expected to be complete by April 30, 2018. Fiscal 2017 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $40,766,512 are being obligated at the time of award. The Launch Systems Enterprise Directorate, Space and Missile Systems Center, Los Angeles AFB, California, is the contracting activity (FA8811-16-9-0001).
Starship is the fully reusable spacecraft and second stage of the Starship system.
{{cite AV media}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)