Censorship in Germany

Last updated

Germany has taken many forms throughout the history of censorship in the country. Various regimes have restricted the press, cinema, literature, and other entertainment venues. In contemporary Germany, the Grundgesetz (Basic Law) generally guarantees freedom of press, speech, and opinion.

Contents

Today, censorship is mainly exerted in the form of restriction of access to certain media (examples include motion pictures and video games) to older adolescents or adults, as well as perceived online fake news, hate speech and misinformation.

Furthermore, the publication of works violating the rights of the individual or those considered to be capable of inciting popular hatred (Volksverhetzung) may be prohibited. Possession of such works (including Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf ), however, is generally not punishable. As of 2022, Germany is ranked 22nd on the Press Freedom Index.

Before 1871

Most of the various smaller German states that later became the modern nation-state of Germany had censorship laws that severely restricted press freedom and made criticism of the government difficult or impossible. In large measure these were a result of the 1819 Carlsbad Decrees which, inter alia, expanded the censorship of the press. [1] Censorship was enforced through the requirement to have a government license to publish books or newspapers, and the mandatory use of an impressum on printed material to identify authors and publishers. However, the city-republics such as Frankfurt and Hamburg tended to have a free press, a rarity in 19th century Germany. [2] The Prussian invasion, occupation and annexation of Frankfurt was in large part motivated by the Prussian government's irritation with the Frankfurt free press; unlike Frankfurt, Prussia had severe censorship laws. [3]

German Empire (1871–1918)

In the German Empire, many forms of media were under imperial control. Before World War I, the government appointed civil administrators and bureaucrats who were in charge of ensuring the public decency of printed material within the Empire.

The Imperial Press Law of 1874 ended the government's right to censor materials before publishing. It also eliminated the need for a government-issued license to publish. [4] However, the government retained the right to be notified of all publications when printing began and could prosecute editors for the content featured in their works. Most often, editors were imprisoned for the publication of material which insulted the monarch. [5] At this point, theatres, cinemas, cabarets, and music halls were still subject to state licensing. Police had direct control over these venues.

Although overall restrictions on film were not codified into law at this time, movies were monitored and regulated. [6] However, this process was subjective and varied case-by-case and locality by locality. The local government cut and banned any material deemed to be against their best interests. [7] Universal state regulation across the entire Empire began in 1906 when several local police forces formed a collective task force to ban films involving Rudolf Hennig  [ de ] [8] Hennig, a German murderer and fugitive, escaped arrest and embarrassed the police force. Officials hoping to contain news of his escape banned the film. In May 1906, government officials passed a police ordinance requiring that every film shown in Berlin must be examined by the police before it could be presented to public audiences. [9] However, as the number of films and productions increased, it became difficult for police to regulate every work. As such, they attended screenings randomly to check for legal and moral compliance. [10]

Although the state censorship authorities deployed officers all over the Empire, some localities set up their own field offices. The first of these field offices were established in 1912 in the cities of Munich and Stuttgart. [11] These offices often created their own additional compliance requirements, but all films remained subject to the standards established by the state.

With the outbreak of World War I, the military took over the censorship office with the aim of mobilizing German support for the war. A police official was appointed in every city for this purpose. Restrictions on materials became much harsher. Materials could be banned because of association with a particular person or country, or simply because the censor felt that the piece was distracting or a waste of time. Newspapers could be suspended for days at a time as punishment for the publication of "inappropriate material". [12]

Weimar Republic (1918–1933)

Article 118 of the Weimar constitution banned censorship, [13] but excepted film, indecent and obscene literature, and measures at public events to protect youth. Article 48 allowed the President to suspend this guarantee in order to restore public safety and order, with veto power over such actions given to the Reichstag.

An exception to this article was film. The film industry was regulated by the Film Assessment Headquarters. The purpose of this organization was to censor films released in Germany for pornography and other indecent content. [14]

The Gesetz zur Bewahrung der Jugend vor Schund- und Schmutzschriften (“Law for the Protection of Youth from Trash and Filth Writings”) of 18 December 1926 provided for the partial censorship (restrictions on distribution) of printed materials in the interest of youth welfare, though it was only applied post-publication on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, it incorporated limits to what could be censored and on what grounds; printed materials could not be added to the index for political, social, religious, ethical, or world-view-related reasons. [15] However, the goal of this regulation was to restrict content that could ruin the youth intellectually, morally, and physically. [16] Such "harmful" content included dime novels, serialized books, and dramatic pamphlets.

The Weimar Republic maintained a number of criminal provisions for hate crimes and anti-Semitic expression. [17] In response to violent political agitators such as the Nazis, authorities censored advocacy of violence; Emergency decrees were issued giving the power to censor newspapers, and Nazi newspapers were forced to suspend publication hundreds of times. Hitler was prevented from speaking in several German states, and leading Nazis such Goebbels were sentenced to jail time in libel cases. [18]

Nazi Germany (1933–1945)

Shortly after Adolf Hitler rose to power in 1933, he established the Ministry of Propaganda with the goal that this agency would control all forms of mass communication in Germany. [19] At its peak of influence, the Ministry employed 1,500 employees spanning 17 departments. [20] Censorship policy was produced and implemented by the Reich Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels. As such, Goebbels oversaw the publication of all media that was to be widely distributed — literature, music, newspapers, and public events. [21] Any material that threatened the reputation of Hitler's government or spoke ill of the regime was immediately censored and retracted. [22] Additionally, books that were already in circulation and written by Jewish authors were collected and burned. [23] Nazi bureaucrats saw their work and information control as necessary. It was, in their minds their duty to protect the German public from the harms of "undesirable books". [24]

The control of information among young people was especially vital to the German government. On May 10, 1933, shortly after the Nazis rose to power, the government burned one-third of the total library holdings in Germany. [25] As soldiers burned at least 25,000 books in the center of Berlin, Goebbels spoke of the evils of literature and encouraged massive crowds to say “No to decadence and moral corruption!”. [26] This event began a widespread effort to illustrate government control and align public opinion with party ideology.

The aim of censorship under the Nazi regime was simple: to reinforce Nazi power and to suppress opposing viewpoints and information. [27]

Divided Germany

East Germany (1945–1990)

According to the Constitution of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), censorship of any kind was forbidden. [28] However, the government of the GDR took measures to ensure that all publications were in line with their ideological grounding. [29]

The Office of Head Administration for Publishing and Book Trade was tasked with regulating all material published within the GDR. [28] The office aimed to produce material that was both politically correct and a reflection of communist values; however, the office was often advertised to the public as "a means for improving the quality of literature". [30] Most division chiefs were literary figures with a history of party loyalty; oftentimes a former head of a publishing house or an author filled the role. [28] In order to have material published and printed, an author or publisher had to submit the work to the Office and acquire a permit. Writers typically experienced a processing time of one to two months. [31] Refusal to publish was not uncommon; a team of six typically rejected 250 manuscripts each year after receiving around 600. [28] Approved books were published and around 10,000 copies of each book entered circulation. [32]

Other types of art were also highly regulated. Permission was required to exhibit or perform any visual art. [33] In addition, journalists without government approval were not hired. [32]

The primary goal of East German censorship – whether it be to regulate books, films, or other forms of art – was to protect the interests of communism and its implementation. Works critical of the East German or Soviet governments were forbidden, as were any works which seemed sympathetic to fascism. [28]

Around 1989, as the people of East Germany grew more and more displeased with the state of the country, the rejection of material that celebrated West Germany heightened. [34] Thousands of East Germans were fleeing west and the demand for West German materials – films, books, and magazines – was on the rise. [35] As a result, the literature market for East German publications suffered. [28] Books sat undistributed in Office warehouses as the demand for material was nearly nonexistent.

West Germany (1945–1990)

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the West German media was subject to censorship by the forces of the Allied occupation. Authors, publishers, distributors, and sellers were all subject to prosecution for spreading "poisonous material". [36] [ full citation needed ] Content displaying communist affections or we anti-democracy leanings were most heavily regulated. [36] The most celebrated characteristic of acceptable publications was party loyalty; West German Government officials repressed any content that did not allude to political support and nationalism. [37] [ full citation needed ] Publications void of total party support were taken off the shelves amid discovery and added to a blacklist. [38] In all, around 30,000 titles were confiscated and every copy was to be destroyed. Often, such works would be discovered by a non-governmental party loyalist committed to the cause. The representative of the Allied forces admitted that the order in principle was no different from the Nazi book burnings, although unlike the burnings, the measure was seen as a temporary part of the denazification program. [39]

Another main goal of widespread censorship in West Germany was to protect youths from "poisonous" material. [40] [ full citation needed ] Government officials worked to prevent individuals under the age of eighteen from being exposed to content considered immoral, dangerous, or inappropriate. Tapes, films, books, magazines, and music were restricted and added to the list of "youth-endangering writings" should they showcase improper content. [40] Officials took it upon themselves to rid young West Germans of content which featured expletives, sexual interactions, excessive affection, war, or substance use.

Re-unified Germany (1990–present)

When the official government, the Federal Republic of Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland) took over in 1949, the limits on free speech were relaxed. The new German constitution from 1949 guaranteed freedom of press, speech, and opinion; the government continued to fight "anti-constitutional" activities, especially communist subversion during the Cold War. When East Germany ceased to exist and its territory became part of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1990, it became subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic of Germany; the same protections and restrictions in West Germany apply to contemporary Germany. However, continued globalization and the advent of Internet marketing present a new host of complications to German censorship and information laws.

Publications violating laws (e.g., promoting Volksverhetzung or slander and libel) can be censored in today's Germany, with authors and publishers potentially subject to penalties. Strafgesetzbuch section 86a forms a relatively strict prohibition on the public display of "symbols of unconstitutional organizations" outside the context of "art or science, research or teaching". [41] Such symbols include the swastika [42] and the black flag of ISIL, [43] although the legality of some symbols is dependent on the context in which they are displayed—a swastika may be displayed in a Buddhist temple, for example. Materials written or printed by organizations ruled to be anti-constitutional, like the NSDAP or the Red Army Faction (Baader-Meinhof Gang), have also been placed on the index. Public Holocaust denial is also prohibited and may be severely punished with up to five years in prison. [44] A decision of a court that assumes that a publication is violating another person's personal rights may also lead to censoring (a newspaper for example can be forced not to publish private pictures).

An authority that is often accused of censorship is the Bundeszentrale für Kinder- und Jugendmedienschutz (Federal Department for the Protection of Children and Young People in the Media), which checks the media for possible dangers to young people. The body manages a list of works that may be purchased by adults only, and the exhibition (for sale) is usually also prohibited. While this indexing can grant publicity to some works, publishers often try to avoid indexing, to make the media available to a wider audience. Methods to avoid inclusion on the list include the reduction of violent scenes in movies and the removal of Nazi symbols in games in cases of propaganda. Education purposes and the freedom of arts allow the appearance of Nazi symbols in films and games in other cases.

The Unterhaltungssoftware Selbstkontrolle (USK) is a privately organized body that also controls (electronic) media regarding their suitability for minors. The German Jugendschutzgesetz (Youth Protection Act) of 2003 made the former advisory-only label a de facto requirement; only products controlled by such a body may be publicly displayed for sale, with further restrictions applying to such media considered to be "18+".

In the 1990s and 2000s, the struggle against Scientology in Germany has been a major issue, as Scientology is viewed by the German authorities as a threat to democracy and a predatory commercial organization, not a religion. Scientology remains under government surveillance, and there have been attempts to ban the organization entirely. [45]

In 2022, several German states have banned public displays of the "Z symbol", a symbol used for supporters of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. [46] "The Russian attack on Ukraine is a crime and whoever publicly approves of this war can thereby become criminally liable," said Marek Wede, a spokesperson for Germany's Interior Ministry. [47] Critics of this policy note that banning the public display of the letter "Z" does not assist Ukraine and that it may embolden supporters of Russia who already claim to feel victimized. [48]

On November 2, 2023 in response to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, the German Interior Ministry announced a ban on the slogan "From the River to the Sea" as part of the German government's prohibition of Palestinian organization Hamas and pro-Palestinian network Samidoun. [49] [50] As a result, the use of the phrase could be punished by a fine and imprisonment for a period of up to three years. [51] However, opinion amongst legal experts differs as to whether the ban on this slogan will be upheld by the courts. [52]

Berlin's Education Senator issued a prohibition on the wearing of the Palestinian keffiyeh in Berlin schools on 16 October 2023, [53] explaining to school administrators that wearing the keffiyeh could be understood as advocating or condoning the attacks against Israel or supporting the militant groups, such as Hamas or Hezbollah. [54] However, this policy has been criticized by other politicians as being a blanket ban on legitimate Palestinian symbols and in their view, might not be legal under German constitutional law. [55] Germany's crackdown on pro-Palestinian speech and events has also impacted anti-war Jewish activists and vigils organized by Jewish groups. [56]

Religious censorship

In 2002, there was a legal controversy regarding the "Power for Living" campaign by the Christian Arthur S. DeMoss Foundation featuring celebrities Cliff Richard and Bernhard Langer. The TV advertisements for their book were banned because they were considered as "advertising a worldview or religion", which is forbidden by § 7 section 8 of the state treaty on broadcasting (Rundfunkstaatsvertrag) and European laws on media. For its posters, newspaper adverts and leaflets, however, there was no such problem. [57]

Network Enforcement Act

The Network Enforcement Act or NetzDG which was passed in the Bundestag in 2017 has been criticized heavily by politicians, human rights groups, journalists and academics for incentivising social media platforms to pre-emptively censor valid and lawful expression, and making them the arbiter of what constitutes free expression and curtailing freedom of speech in Germany. [58]

See also

Related Research Articles

Although Australia is considered to have, in general, both freedom of speech and a free and independent media, certain subject-matter is subject to various forms of government censorship. These include matters of national security, judicial non-publication or suppression orders, defamation law, the federal Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), film and literature classification, and advertising restrictions.

France has a long history of governmental censorship, particularly in the 16th to 19th centuries, but today freedom of press is guaranteed by the French Constitution and instances of governmental censorship are limited.

In Canada, appeals by the judiciary to community standards and the public interest are the ultimate determinants of which forms of expression may legally be published, broadcast, or otherwise publicly disseminated. Other public organisations with the authority to censor include some tribunals and courts under provincial human rights laws, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, along with self-policing associations of private corporations such as the Canadian Association of Broadcasters and the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council.

Censorship in South Korea is implemented by various laws that were included in the constitution as well as acts passed by the National Assembly over the decades since 1948. These include the National Security Act, whereby the government may limit the expression of ideas that it perceives "praise or incite the activities of anti-state individuals or groups". Censorship was particularly severe during the country's authoritarian era, with freedom of expression being non-existent, which lasted from 1948 to 1993.

As with many Soviet-allied countries prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall, the government of the former German Democratic Republic applied censorship during its existence from 1949 to 1990. The censorship was practised through a hierarchical but unofficial censorship apparatus, ultimately controlled by the ruling party (SED). Through censorship, the socialist point of view on society was ensured in all forms of literature, arts, culture and public communication. Due to the lack of an official censorship apparatus, censorship was applied locally in a highly structured and institutionalized manner under the control of the SED.

The Federal Republic of Germany guarantees freedom of speech, expression, and opinion to its citizens as per Article 5 of the constitution. Despite this, censorship of various materials has taken place since the Allied occupation after World War II and continues to take place in Germany in various forms due to a limiting provision in Article 5, Paragraph 2 of the constitution. In 2014 the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index ranked Germany as 14th in the world in terms of press freedom. During the Allied occupation of Germany, the media was controlled by the occupying forces. The policy rationales differed among the occupying powers, but there was resentment in literary and journalistic circles in many parts of the country. Undesired publishing efforts were unilaterally blocked by the occupying forces.

Censorship in Myanmar results from government policies in controlling and regulating certain information, particularly on religious, ethnic, political, and moral grounds.

Multiple forms of media including books, newspapers, magazines, films, television, and content published on the Internet are censored in Saudi Arabia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Israel</span> Print, broadcast and online media in the State of Israel

There are over ten different languages in the Israeli media, with Hebrew as the predominant one. Press in Arabic caters to the Arab citizens of Israel, with readers from areas including those governed by the Palestinian National Authority. During the eighties and nineties, the Israeli press underwent a process of significant change as the media gradually came to be controlled by a limited number of organizations, whereas the papers published by political parties began to disappear. Today, three large, privately owned conglomerates based in Tel Aviv dominate the mass media in Israel.

In the United States, censorship involves the suppression of speech or public communication and raises issues of freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Interpretation of this fundamental freedom has varied since its enshrinement. Traditionally, the First Amendment was regarded as applying only to the Federal government, leaving the states and local communities free to censor or not. As the applicability of states rights in lawmaking vis-a-vis citizens' national rights began to wane in the wake of the Civil War, censorship by any level of government eventually came under scrutiny, but not without resistance. For example, in recent decades, censorial restraints increased during the 1950s period of widespread anti-communist sentiment, as exemplified by the hearings of the House Committee on Un-American Activities. In Miller v. California (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court found that the First Amendment's freedom of speech does not apply to obscenity, which can, therefore, be censored. While certain forms of hate speech are legal so long as they do not turn to action or incite others to commit illegal acts, more severe forms have led to people or groups being denied marching permits or the Westboro Baptist Church being sued, although the initial adverse ruling against the latter was later overturned on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court case Snyder v. Phelps.

Sweden protects freedom of speech in certain circumstances and was a pioneer in officially abolishing censorship. A number of restrictions remain such as child pornography, hate speech and libel. In all cases there is a legal process afterwards if applicable and no media are censored before publishing.

Censorship in Israel is officially carried out by the Israeli Military Censor, a unit in the Israeli government officially tasked with carrying out preventive censorship regarding the publication of information that might affect the security of Israel. The body is headed by the Israeli Chief Censor, a military official appointed by Israel's Minister of Defense, who bestows upon the Chief Censor the authority to suppress information he deems compromising from being made public in the media, such as Israel's nuclear weapons program and Israel's military operations outside its borders. On average, 2240 press articles in Israel are censored by the Israeli Military Censor each year, approximately 240 of which in full, and around 2000 partially.

Censorship in Japan has taken many forms throughout the history of the country. While Article 21 of the Constitution of Japan guarantees freedom of expression and prohibits formal censorship, effective censorship of obscene content does exist and is justified by the Article 175 of the Criminal Code of Japan. Historically, the law has been interpreted in different ways—recently it has been interpreted to mean that all pornography must be at least partly censored, and a few arrests have been made based on this law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship</span> Suppression of speech or other information

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions, and other controlling bodies.

Censorship in New Zealand has been present since around 1850 and is currently managed by the Classification Office under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Book censorship</span> Book removed or banned from public and/or private usage

Book censorship is the act of some authority taking measures to suppress ideas and information within a book. Censorship is "the regulation of free speech and other forms of entrenched authority". Censors typically identify as either a concerned parent, community members who react to a text without reading, or local or national organizations. Books have been censored by authoritarian dictatorships to silence dissent, such as the People's Republic of China, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Books are most often censored for age appropriateness, offensive language, sexual content, amongst other reasons. Similarly, religions may issue lists of banned books, such as the historical example of the Roman Catholic Church's Index Librorum Prohibitorum and bans of such books as Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses by Ayatollah Khomeini, which do not always carry legal force. Censorship can be enacted at the national or subnational level as well, and can carry legal penalties. In many cases, the authors of these books could face harsh sentences, exile from the country, or even execution.

Censorship in the Czech Republic had been highly active until 17 November 1989 and the fall of Communism in the former Czechoslovakia. Czech Republic was ranked as the 13th most free country in the World Press Freedom Index in 2014.

In the Philippines, censorship involves the control of certain information.

Censorship in Indonesia has varied since the country declared its independence in 1945. For most of its history the government of Indonesia has not fully allowed free speech and has censored Western movies, books,films, and music as well. However, partly due to the weakness of the state and cultural factors, it has never been a country with full censorship where no critical voices were able to be printed or voiced.

Censorship in Poland was first recorded in the 15th century, and it was most notable during the Communist period in the 20th century.

References

  1. ↑ Ohles, Frederik (2001). "Germany: The French Occupation (1806–14) and the German Confederation (1815–71)". In Jones, Derek (ed.). Censorship: A World Encyclopedia. Vol. 2, E–K. London: Fitzroy Dearborn. pp.  920–922. ISBN   978-1-57958-135-0.
  2. ↑ Bösch, Frank (2011). Mediengeschichte: Vom asiatischen Buchdruck zum Fernsehen (in German). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. pp. 71, 169 (others?). ISBN   978-3-593-39379-7.
  3. ↑ Keyserlingk, Robert H. (1967). "Bismarck and the Press: The Example of the National Liberals". Historical Papers Presented at the Annual Meeting, Canadian Historical Association. 2 (1): 198–215, page 208. doi: 10.7202/030678ar .
  4. ↑ "GHDI - Document". germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org.
  5. ↑ "GHDI - Document". germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org.
  6. ↑ Ritzheimer, Kara (2016). "Trash," Censorship, and National Identity in Early Twentieth-Century Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. ↑ Loiperdinger, M (2013). Film Censorship in Germany: Continuity and Change Through Five Political Systems. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. ↑ Loiperdinger, M (2013). Film Censorship in Germany: Continuity and Change Through Five Political Systems. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. ↑ Wickenhauser, Ida (1967). The History and Organization of Film Censorship 1895-1918. Vienna.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  10. ↑ Stark, Gary (1982). "Cinema, Society, and the State: Policing the Film Industry in Imperial Germany". Essays on Culture and Society in Modern Germany.
  11. ↑ Stark, Gary (1982). "Cinema, Society, and the State: Policing the Film Industry in Imperial Germany". Essays on Culture and Society in Modern Germany.
  12. ↑ Demm, Eberhard. "Censorship". International Encyclopedia of the First World War (WW1).
  13. ↑ Ritzheimer, Kara L (2016). 'Trash,' Censorship, and National Identity in Early Twentieth-Century Germany. Cambridge University Press.
  14. ↑ Marhoefer, Laurie (2016). The Film Was a Revelation, I Recognized Myself in it.
  15. ↑ Reichsgesetzblatt Nr. 67 vom 24. Dezember 1926, S. 505-506
  16. ↑ Ritzheimer, Lara (2016). "Trash,' Censorship, and National Identity in Early Twentieth-Century Germany".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. ↑ Cyril Levitt, Under the Shadow of Weimar: What Are the Lessons for the Modern Democracies? in UNDER THE SHADOW OF WEIMAR: DEMOCRACY, LAW, AND RACIAL INCITEMENT IN SIX COUNTRIES 16, 17 (Louis Greenspan & Cyril Levitt eds., 1993).
  18. ↑ Doskow, Ambrose; Jacoby, Sidney. ANTI-SEMITISM AND THE LAW IN PRE-NAZI GERMANY (PDF). Committee on Public Relations of the General Jewish Council. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
  19. ↑ "Control and opposition in Nazi Germany". BBC Bitesize.
  20. ↑ Pieter Barbian., Jan (2013). The Politics of Literature in Nazi Germany: Books and the Media Dictatorship. Bloomsbury.
  21. ↑ "Nazi Propaganda and Censorship". Holocaust Encyclopedia.
  22. ↑ "Nazi Propaganda and Censorship". Holocaust Encyclopedia.
  23. ↑ Guenter, Lewy (2016). Harmful and Undesirable: Book Censorship in Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.
  24. ↑ Guenter, Lewy (2016). Harmful and Undesirable: Book Censorship in Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.
  25. ↑ Bosmajian, Hamida (1986). "Censorship and Mythmaking in Nazi Germany". Children's Literature. 14: 171–175. doi:10.1353/chl.0.0136. S2CID   143827848.
  26. ↑ "Book Burning". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
  27. ↑ "Control and opposition in Nazi Germany". BBC Bitesize.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Darnton, Robert (1995). Censorship, a Comparative View: France, 1789 – East Germany, 1989.
  29. ↑ Zipser, Richard A. The Many Face of Censorship in the German Democratic Republic, 1949–1989.
  30. ↑ Schubbe, Elimar (August 16, 1951). Regulation on the Development of Advanced Literature. Seewald.
  31. ↑ Habitzel, Kurt (1992). The historical novel of the GDR and Censorship.
  32. 1 2 Duty, Helga (1973). Mein Dorf.
  33. ↑ Costabile-Heming, Carol Anne (2000). "'Rezensur': A Case Study of Censorship and Programmatic Reception in the GDR". Monatshefte. 92 (1): 53–67. JSTOR   30153853.
  34. ↑ Schubbe, Elimar (August 16, 1951). Regulation on the Development of Advanced Literature. Seewald.
  35. ↑ Habitzel, Kurt (1992). The historical novel of the GDR and Censorship.
  36. 1 2 Cutajar, Mario. "West Germany: Censorship and Repression in the Model State".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  37. ↑ Krieger, Verena (2017). "When exhibitions become politics". HerausgeberIn.
  38. ↑ Jones, Sara (2011). Complicity, Censorship and Criticism: Negotiating Space in the GDR Literary Sphere.
  39. ↑ "Read No Evil". Time . May 27, 1946. Archived from the original on 2009-06-27.
  40. 1 2 Stefen, Rudolf. "Violence in SF, and Censorship in West Germany". The Sociology of Science Fiction.
  41. ↑ "Section 86a Use of Symbols of Unconstitutional Organizations". Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB). German Law Archive.
  42. ↑ Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 23. Oktober 1952, Aktenzeichen 1 BvB 1/51; Fundstelle: BVerfGE  [ de ] 2, 1 Archived 2003-01-19 at the Wayback Machine
  43. ↑ "Germany 2014 human rights report - US Department of State" (PDF). state.gov. United States Department of State. 2014. p. 11. Retrieved September 11, 2018. On September 12 (2014), the Federal Interior Ministry banned any activities of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), including recruitment, fundraising, and the use of the group's symbols under the name "Islamic State" (German: Islamischer Staat), such as the black flag bearing ISIL's name.
  44. ↑ "German Penal Code (section 130)". Strafgesetzbuch. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  45. ↑ "German official wants Scientology banned". NBC News .
  46. ↑ "Some German states plan to criminalize use of 'Z' symbol supporting Russia's invasion of Ukraine". USA Today . March 28, 2022.
  47. ↑ "Germany could prosecute people who use pro-Russia Z symbol". March 28, 2022.
  48. ↑ "German States Will Prosecute Speech That Supports the Russian Invasion of Ukraine". April 7, 2022.
  49. ↑ Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat (2 November 2023). "Bekanntmachung eines Vereinsverbots gemäß § 3 des Vereinsgesetzes Verbot der Vereinigung "HAMAS (Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya)"" (PDF). Bundesanzeiger (BAnz AT 02.11.2023 B10): 6.
  50. ↑ Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heima (2 November 2023). "Bekanntmachung eines Vereinsverbots gegen die Vereinigung Samidoun" (PDF). Bundesanzeiger (BAnz AT 02.11.2023 B12): 3.
  51. ↑ Rath, Christian (13 November 2023). "Palästinenser-Parole "From the River …" verboten". Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  52. ↑ Rath, Christian (13 November 2023). ""From the River …" ist verboten". Die Tageszeitung. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  53. ↑ Lenz, Susanne (17 October 2023). "Wie das Palästinensertuch zum politisch brisantesten Stück Stoff der Welt wurde". Berliner Zeitung . Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  54. ↑ Latz, Christian (13 October 2023). ""Stellt Gefährdung des Schulfriedens dar": Bildungssenatorin ermöglicht Verbot von Palästinensertücher an Berlins Schulen". Tagespiegel . Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  55. ↑ dpa, mgr (13 October 2023). "Senat untersagt Palästinensertücher an Berliner Schulen". t-online . Retrieved 16 November 2023.
  56. ↑ Jackson, James (1 April 2024). "'We Jews are just arrested; Palestinians are beaten': Protesters in Germany". Al Jazeera English . Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  57. ↑ Religious TV advertisements are illegal in Germany – "Power for Living" ads banned by the state media authorities, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rundfunk Evangelischer Freikirchen (AREF), US, 16.01.2002
  58. ↑ "Germany: Flawed Social Media Law". Human Rights Watch. 2018-02-14. Retrieved 2022-01-11.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.