Pamela Kyle Crossley

Last updated
Crossley in 2021 Pamela Kyle Crossley on LCARN 01.jpg
Crossley in 2021

Pamela Kyle Crossley (born 18 November 1955) is a historian of modern China, northern Asia, and global history and is the Charles and Elfriede Collis Professor of History, Dartmouth College. [1] She is a founding appointment of the Dartmouth Society of Fellows.

Contents

She is author of The Wobbling Pivot: China since 1800: An Interpretive History (2010), as well as influential studies of the Qing dynasty (1644–1911) and leading textbooks in global history.

Crossley is known for an interpretation of the source of twentieth-century identities. In her view overland conquest by the great empires of early modern Eurasia produced a special form of rulership which gave high priority to the institutionalization of cultural identity. Crossley suggests that these concepts were encoded in political practice and academic discourse on "nationalism," and prevailed till the end of the twentieth century.

Life

Crossley was born in Lima, Ohio, and attended high school in Emmaus, Pennsylvania. After leaving high school she worked as an editorial assistant and writer on environmental subjects for Rodale Press. In 1977 she graduated from Swarthmore College, where she was editor-in-chief of The Phoenix; her fellow students included David C. Page, Robert Zoellick, Ben Brantley, Wing Thye Woo, Robert P. George, Jacqueline Carey and David G. Bradley. At Swarthmore she was a student of Lillian M. Li and Bruce Cumings, and as an undergraduate began graduate study at the University of Pennsylvania with Hilary Conroy. She later entered Yale University, where she was a student of Yu Ying-shih and Parker Po-fei Huang, and wrote a dissertation under the direction of Jonathan D. Spence. She joined the Dartmouth College faculty in Hanover, New Hampshire, in 1985. After David Farquhar, Gertraude Roth Li, and Beatrice S. Bartlett, Crossley was among the first scholars writing in English to use Manchu-language documents to research the history of the Qing Empire. More specialists subsequently adopted this practice. Crossley is a Guggenheim fellow, an NEH fellow (2011–2012) and a recipient of the Association for Asian Studies Joseph Levenson Book Prize for A Translucent Mirror. Dartmouth students have given her the Goldstein Prize for teaching. [2] Crossley resides in Norwich, Vermont. [3]

Publications

Most recently Crossley has published The Wobbling Pivot: China Since 1800, An Interpretive History which takes the resilience and coherence of local communities in China as a theme for interpreting the transition from the late imperial to the modern era. Crossley's previous books are What is Global History? (Polity Press, 2008), [4] an examination of narrative strategies in global history that joins a new series of short introductory books inspired by E.H. Carr's What is History?. Crossley's books on Chinese history include Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations and the End of the Qing World (Princeton University Press, 1990); The Manchus (Blackwells Publishers, 1997); [5] A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology (University of California Press, 1999). [6] She is also a co-author of the best-selling global history textbooks, The Earth and its Peoples (Houghton Mifflin, 5th edition, 2009; 6th edition, 2014) [7] and Global Society: The World since 1900 (Houghton Mifflin, 2nd edition, 2007; 3rd edition, 2012). [8] Her work has appeared in two separate series of the Cambridge histories. She is widely published both in academic journals and in periodicals such as London Review of Books, Wall Street Journal, The New York Times Literary Supplement, The New Republic, Royal Academy Magazine, Far Eastern Economic Review,Calliope, and in the online editorial spaces of the BBC. She has participated in A&E's "In Search of..." series ("The Forbidden City"). In January 2012 the new educational platform The Faculty Project announced that Crossley would produce a video course on Modern China for their site. [9] Unusually, Crossley maintains an errata page for her publications, including exchanges with translators. [10]

"Qing Studies," "New Qing History" and criticism by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

Crossley is noted for her work in what has been called either New Qing History or Qing Studies. She pointed out that Manchu language, religion, documents, and customs remained of great importance to the Qing until the middle 19th century. Her book "Orphan Warriors" was the first to develop a sustained critique of conventional assumptions of "sinicization". She agreed that assimilation and acculturation were part of China's history, but considered "sinicization" to be something that historians had imbued with a charismatic quality with no basis in fact. She disagreed with earlier scholars that Manchus had been "sinicized", but she did not argue that Manchu culture in modern China was the traditional culture of Manchuria. Rather, it was a new culture of individual Manchu communities in China, what she called "the sense of difference that has no outward sign". [11]

Many historians such as Joanna Waley-Cohen have named Crossley as related to the "New Qing History" school. William T. Rowe of Johns Hopkins University describes Crossley as the "pioneer" of these new ways of thinking about Qing history. [12] Earlier, political commentator Charles Horner pointed to Crossley as one of the most important current historians in the reconceptualization of the Qing period and its significance, which he did not refer to as "New Qing History". [13] Crossley was however critiqued by some Chinese scholars including those from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences for some of her work.

In publications in Korea and China since 2008 Crossley has written that there are two trends that are often conflated, one a "Manchu-centered" school and another group who view the Qing empire as a "historical object" in its own right (not only a phase in Chinese history). She criticized the "Manchu-centered" school for romanticism and relying on disproved theories about "Altaic" language, culture and history. She also argued that the analyses used by the group called "New Qing Historians" by Waley-Cohen and later popular with Chinese historians were various and conflicting, and that "New Qing History" as a "school" could not reasonably be extended beyond the small group who actually called themselves writers of "New Qing History." On the other hand, she seems to have included herself in the Qing empire school, which she calls "Qing Studies." [14] She sees the Qing empire not as a Manchu empire but as a "simultaneous" system (like many other historical empires) in which the emperor is not subordinate to any single culture.

Of Crossley's books, only What is Global History? has been successfully translated and published in China. On April 20, 2015, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences published a criticism by historian Li Zhiting [15] of historians he called a "New Qing History" faction, accusing former Association for Asian Studies President Evelyn Rawski, Crossley, Mark C. Elliott and James A. Millward personally as being apologists for imperialism, producing fraudulent history and encouraging "splittism" in border areas. This followed Internet criticism by some Chinese posters of Crossley's 2011 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, in which she contrasted the international foundations of the 1911 Revolution in China with the narrow nationalism of the hundred-year celebration in 2011. Possibly Li Zhiting used some criticisms that Crossley herself had written in a 2008 essay [16] which was translated into both Korean and Chinese in 2009 and 2010.

Whereas Chinese scholars like Li Zhiting represented an older generation of Marxist historians in China, papers by other Chinese scholars like Li Aiyong and Zhang Jian reflected more respected criticisms, using more thorough and careful approaches, such as pointing out the various ways in which the word "sinicization" can be understood, and identifying the limitations of using Manchu ethnicity and language to make an argument against the sinicization thesis. [17] Certain Chinese scholars like Ding Yizhuang also support the New Qing History and have actively worked together with "New Qing" historians. Due to the frequent academic interactions between China and the rest of the world, Chinese scholars, particularly those studying Qing history and general Chinese history, are more conscious of the issues offered by the New Qing History. [18]

Chinese scholar Zhong Han of Minzu University criticized Crossley's methodologies and interpretations. [19] He argued against the characterization of the Qing as a Western-style colonial empire, and against the non-identity of the Qing and China, employing non-Chinese language sources for the latter. [20] He also cited errors in an article of hers that had been translated into Chinese. Crossley maintains a voluminous errata site linked to her faculty page since 1995; in a tweet, she pointed out that Zhong had missed the "good stuff" and recommended that he visit the page. Subsequently, Professor Liu Wenpeng denounced the concept of "Inner Asia" as used by "New Qing" historians, apparently following Crossley's 2009 discussion of the history of the Inner Asian term. [14]

The History of Qing is a project sponsored by the State Council of the People's Republic of China since 2002 for an official history of the Qing dynasty, as a revision of the 1928 Draft History of Qing . In November 2023, Zhang Taisu  [ zh ] of Yale Law School stated that he had learnt the work eventually failed to pass political review due to being "too influenced by" what has been labeled "foreign New Qing History", although he believed the association made between the project as a whole and the New Qing History school as being unwarranted. [21] Following the review failure, Chinese president Xi Jinping requested scholars working on the project to make changes to the tome to better align with Xi's vision for the future. In a 2024 interview with The Wall Street Journal , Crossley stated that "[a]ccording to Xi Jinping, there have been no conquests in Chinese history. Only happy unifications with people aspiring to be Chinese". [22]

According to Professor Guo Wu, Crossley noted the somewhat different approaches taken by New Qing historians, as well as their two general tendencies. He stated that the New Qing History includes a number of perspectives and assumptions shaped by postmodern history and has raised several important questions. With its deconstruction of ideas including the contemporary Chinese master narrative of nation-building, and given China's strong sense of victimization and vulnerability the debate has become emotionally charged and politicized to certain extent. He maintained that an objective and depoliticized examination of the New Qing History demonstrates its contributions to the study of China, including the resulting debate about the meaning of "sinicization" and contentious discussions regarding the historical meanings of "China" and "Chinese". He added that Chinese scholars helped to refine the definition of China from Chinese perspectives in reaction to the somewhat overly radical challenge of some New Qing historians, who have attempted, consciously or unconsciously, to reduce "China" (Zhongguo) to China proper and "Chinese" (Zhongguoren) to the Han people. [23]

Global history

Crossley was a co-author of The Earth and its Peoples, which was a revolutionary text in 1997.[ citation needed ] She was invited to write What is Global History? in a Polity Press series of short texts introducing historical genres to undergraduates. It is a study of "narrative strategies" used by historians from many cultures, over history, to attempt to tell "a story without a center," which Crossley regards as the defining quality of "global history." In her own research work in the field of world or global history Crossley is known primarily for arguing, in agreement with a certain number of other historians of China, that not only material but also cultural and political trends produced an "early modern" period across Eurasia from about 1500 to about 1800. She has commented that while a Eurasian chronology that could be used for teaching is possible (as in the example of early modernity), it is not "global" since it would bring together Chinese and European history but isolate the histories of Africa, Australia, and North and South America.

Software development

Crossley is a software author, and has created applications for use by teachers, professors, community organizers to manage web pages. The free applications are specially designed for display of all "horizontally-written" scripts, and integrate functions needed for instant web page management. A widely used app aids students in study and memorization of the Chinese classic Daxue 大學. Other software makes this famous reference work Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period used by students who do not know the Wade–Giles system accessible, and also integrates to Harvard University GIS database. It is available to the public (link) both as a web interface and as a desktop internet application.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manchuria</span> Geographical region in Northeast Asia

Manchuria is a term that refers to a region in northeast Asia encompassing the entirety of present-day northeast China, and historically parts of the modern-day Russian Far East, often referred to as Outer Manchuria. Its definition may refer to varying geographical extents as follows: in the narrow sense, the area constituted by three Chinese provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Liaoning but broadly also including the eastern Inner Mongolian prefectures of Hulunbuir, Hinggan, Tongliao, and Chifeng, collectively known as Northeast China; in a broader sense, the area of historical Manchuria includes the aforementioned regions plus the Amur river basin, parts of which were ceded to the Russian Empire by the Manchu-led Qing dynasty during the Amur Annexation of 1858–1860. The parts of Manchuria ceded to Russia are collectively known as Outer Manchuria or Russian Manchuria, which include present-day Amur Oblast, Primorsky Krai, the Jewish Autonomous Oblast, the southern part of Khabarovsk Krai, and the eastern edge of Zabaykalsky Krai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Changbai Mountains</span> Mountain range in China and North Korea

The Changbai Mountains are a major mountain range in East Asia that extends from the Northeast Chinese provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning, across the China-North Korea border, to the North Korean provinces of Ryanggang and Chagang. They are also referred to as the Šanggiyan Mountains in the Manchu language, or the Great Paekdu in Korean. Most of its peaks exceed 2,000 m (6,600 ft) in height, with the tallest summit being Paektu Mountain at 2,744 m (9,003 ft), which contains the Heaven Lake, the highest volcanic crater lake in the world at an surface elevation of 2,189.1 m (7,182 ft). The protected area Longwanqun National Forest Park is located within the vicinity of the mountain range.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Taiji</span> Founding emperor of the Qing dynasty from 1636 to 1643

Hong Taiji, also rendered as Huang Taiji and sometimes referred to as Abahai in Western literature, also known by his temple name as the Emperor Taizong of Qing, was the second khan of the Later Jin dynasty and the founding emperor of the Qing dynasty. He was responsible for consolidating the empire that his father Nurhaci had founded and laid the groundwork for the conquest of the Ming dynasty, although he died before this was accomplished. He was also responsible for changing the name of the Jurchens to "Manchu" in 1635, and changing the name of his dynasty from "Great Jin" to "Great Qing" in 1636.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Aisin-Gioro</span> Manchu clan and imperial house of China

The House of Aisin-Gioro is a Manchu clan that ruled the Later Jin dynasty (1616–1636), the Qing dynasty (1636–1912), and Manchukuo (1932–1945) in the history of China. Under the Ming dynasty, members of the Aisin Gioro clan served as chiefs of the Jianzhou Jurchens, one of the three major Jurchen tribes at this time. Qing bannermen passed through the gates of the Great Wall in 1644, and eventually conquered the short-lived Shun dynasty, Xi dynasty and Southern Ming dynasty. After gaining total control of China proper, the Qing dynasty later expanded into other adjacent regions, including Xinjiang, Tibet, Outer Mongolia, and Taiwan. The dynasty reached its zenith during the High Qing era and under the Qianlong Emperor, who reigned from 1735 to 1796. This reign was followed by a century of gradual decline.

The Jianzhou Jurchens were one of the three major groups of Jurchens as identified by the Ming dynasty. Although the geographic location of the Jianzhou Jurchens changed throughout history, during the 14th century they were located south of the Wild Jurchens and the Haixi Jurchens, and inhabited modern-day Liaoning and Jilin provinces in China. The Jianzhou Jurchens were known to possess an abundant supply of natural resources. They also possessed industrial secrets, particularly in processing ginseng and the dyeing of cloth. They were powerful due to their proximity to Ming trading towns such as Fushun, Kaiyuan, and Tieling in Liaodong, and to Manpojin camp near Korea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nian Rebellion</span> Armed rebellion in Northern China from 1851 to 1868

The Nian Rebellion was an insurrection against the Qing dynasty in northern China from 1851 to 1868, contemporaneously with the Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) in southern China. The rebellion was suppressed, but the population and economic losses contributed to the collapse of the empire in the early 20th century.

Hūlun gurun was a powerful confederacy of Haixi Jurchens tribes in the late 16th century, based primarily in modern Jilin province of China.

De-Sinicization is a process of eliminating or reducing Han Chinese cultural elements, identity, or consciousness from a society or nation. In modern contexts, it is often contrasted with the assimilation process of Sinicization.

A conquest dynasty in the history of China refers to a Chinese dynasty established by non-Han ethnicities which ruled parts or all of China proper, the traditional heartland of the Han people, and whose rulers may or may not have fully assimilated into the dominant Han culture. Four major dynasties have been considered "conquest dynasties": the Liao (916–1125), the Jin (1115–1234), Yuan (1271–1368), and Qing (1644–1912).

Ping-ti Ho or Bingdi He, who also wrote under the name P.T. Ho, was a Chinese-American historian. He wrote widely on China's history, including works on demography, plant history, ancient archaeology, and contemporary events. He taught at University of Chicago for most of his career, and was president of the Association for Asian Studies in 1975, the first scholar of East Asian descent to have that honor.

<i>Researches on Manchu Origins</i> Qing dynasty history book

Researches on Manchu Origins, also known as Manzhou Yuanliu Kao, is an important history book published by the Qing dynasty government in 1777. The Qianlong Emperor sponsored its compilation with the goal of legitimizing Qing rule, as well as identifying the Qing as a successor to the Jin dynasty (1115–1234). The Manzhou Yuanliu Kao also bolstered Qianlong's conception of the Manchu people as a wu, or martial race.

Shamanism was the dominant religion of the Jurchen people of northeast Asia and of their descendants, the Manchu people. As early as the Jin dynasty (1115–1234), the Jurchens conducted shamanic ceremonies at shrines called tangse. There were two kinds of shamans: those who entered in a trance and let themselves be possessed by the spirits, and those who conducted regular sacrifices to heaven, to a clan's ancestors, or to the clan's protective spirits.

Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period (1644–1912) (ECCP) is a biographical dictionary published in 1943 by the United States Government Printing Office, edited by Arthur W. Hummel, Sr., then head of the Orientalia Division of the Library of Congress. Hummel's chief collaborators were Dr. Tu Lien-che (杜聯喆) and Dr. Fang Chao-ying (房兆楹), Chinese scholars who were married to each other. The work was republished in 2018 by Berkshire under the name Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period: 1644-1911/2.

Identity in China was strongly dependent on the Eight Banner system during the Manchu-led Qing dynasty (1644–1912). China consisted of multiple ethnic groups, of which the Han, Mongols and Manchus participated in the banner system. Identity, however, was defined much more by culture, language and participation in the military until the Qianlong Emperor resurrected the ethnic classifications.

The New Qing History is a historiographical school that gained prominence in the United States in the mid-1990s by offering a major revision of history of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty of China.

Evelyn Sakakida Rawski is an American scholar of Chinese and Inner Asian history. She is currently a Distinguished University Professor in the Department of History of the University of Pittsburgh. She was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of Japanese-American ancestry. She served as president of the Association for Asian Studies in 1995–1996.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sinicization of the Manchus</span> Historical incorporation of the Manchu people into the Han-dominant society

The Sinicization of the Manchus was the process in which the Manchu people became assimilated into the Han-dominated Chinese society. It occurred most prominently during the Qing dynasty when the new Manchu rulers actively attempted to assimilate themselves and their people with the Han to increase the legitimacy of the new dynasty. As a result, when the Qing dynasty fell, many Manchu had already adopted Han Chinese customs, languages and surnames. For example, some descendants of the ruling imperial House of Aisin-Gioro adopted the Han Chinese surname Jin as both Jin and Aisin mean gold.

The History of Qing is an unpublished official history of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912) sponsored by the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) between 2002 and 2023. Since the abolition of the Qing in the 1911 Revolution and the establishment of the Republic of China (ROC), there have been several concerted attempts to write an official Qing history. These are informed by the previous long-standing tradition of each Chinese dynasty writing the history of its predecessor. An unfinished Republican-era manuscript had been assembled during the 1920s, but the effort that began in 2002 has since dwarfed every comparable effort in both length and organizational scale. The project has involved the work of hundreds of scholars and specialists under the supervision of the National Qing History Compilation Committee, chaired since its founding by leading historian Dai Yi (1926–2024).

As a Manchu-led imperial dynasty of China and the last imperial dynasty in Chinese history, the legacy of the Qing dynasty has been significant and enduring. It is generally agreed that the Qing dynasty had major impact in China, laying the foundation for the modern Chinese state as a geographic and ethnic entity. Additionally, it had varying degrees of influence in surrounding countries and other parts of the world.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Pamela Crossley Archived 2018-03-11 at the Wayback Machine Department of History, Dartmouth College.
  2. ↑ "Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-06. Retrieved 2014-10-05.
  3. ↑ "Kenneth C. Crossley Obituary". The Morning Call. Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania. July 18, 2006. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2011-12-24.
  4. ↑ Iqbal, Iftekhar (April 2009). "Review of What is Global History? by Pamela Kyle Crossley". Reviews in History. Archived from the original on 2021-11-30. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  5. ↑ Tighe, Justin (November 2003). "Review of The Manchus by Pamela Kyle Crossley". Eras Journal. Victoria, Australia: Monash University.
  6. ↑ Milward, James (2001). "Review of A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology by Pamela Kyle Crossley". The American Historical Review. 106 (3): 953–954. doi:10.1086/ahr/106.3.953.
  7. ↑ Bulliet, Richard; Crossley, Pamela; Headrick, Daniel; Hirsch, Steven; Johnson, Lyman (January 2014). The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN   9781285965703. Archived from the original on 2024-07-14. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  8. ↑ Crossley, Pamela; Lees, Lynn Hollen; Servos, John W. (22 February 2012). Global Society: The World Since 1900 (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN   978-1285401386. Archived from the original on 14 July 2024. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  9. ↑ The Faculty Project
  10. ↑ "Crossley ERRATA". www.dartmouth.edu. Archived from the original on 2009-05-10. Retrieved 2008-08-30.
  11. ↑ Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations and the End of the Qing World, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990, p.267.
  12. ↑ Rowe, William T. (2009). China's Last Empire: The Great Qing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674036123., p. 195.
  13. ↑ Charles Horner, "China and the Historians Archived 2014-10-06 at the Wayback Machine " The National Interest, Spring 2001
  14. 1 2 Crossley, Pamela Kyle, The Influence of Altaicism on East Asian Studies," Proceedings of the 20098 Berkelley-KU Forum on East Asian Cultural Studies: Toward A New Paradigm in East Asian Cultural Studies, June 24–29, Seoul, South Korea,
  15. ↑ http://www.cssn.cn/zx/201504/t20150420_1592588.shtml Archived 2021-03-28 at the Wayback Machine Li Zhiting criticism of "New Qing History"'
  16. ↑ "The Influence of Altaicism," above.
  17. ↑ "Recent Additions to the New Qing History Debate". Taylor & Francis Online.
  18. ↑ "Understanding "China": Multiple perspectives: Editor's introduction". Taylor & Francis Online.
  19. ↑ ""新清史"学派的着力点在于话语构建-中国社会科学网". www.cssn.cn. Archived from the original on 2015-05-08. Retrieved 2015-05-07.
  20. ↑ Wong (汪榮祖), Young-tsu (2021). "Zhong Han's Critique of the New Qing History". Journal of Chinese Humanities. 7 (1–2): 201–211. doi: 10.1163/23521341-12340114 . S2CID   245204710.
  21. ↑ Ji Xiaohua (紀曉華) (2023-11-07). "Zhōngguó guānchá: Wèi tōngguò zhèngshěn "Qīngshǐ" chùjiāo" 中國觀察：未通過政審 《清史》觸礁 [China Watch: "History of Qing" failed to pass political review and has hit a snag]. Singtao USA (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2023-11-18. Retrieved 2023-11-18.
  22. ↑ Wong, Chun Han. "Xi Jinping's Historians Can't Stop Rewriting China's Imperial Past" . The Wall Street Journal . Archived from the original on 2024-03-23. Retrieved 2024-03-23.
  23. ↑ Wu, Guo (2016). "New Qing History: Dispute, Dialog, and Influence". The Chinese Historical Review. 23 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/1547402X.2016.1168180 . Retrieved November 22, 2024.

Sources

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.