1916 United States presidential election in South Dakota

Last updated

1916 United States presidential election in South Dakota
Flag of South Dakota (1909-1963).svg
  1912 November 7, 1916 1920  
  HUGHES, CHARLES E. HONORABLE LCCN2016857545 (restored) (3x4 crop).png Thomas Woodrow Wilson, Harris & Ewing bw photo portrait, 1919 (cropped 3x4).jpg
Nominee Charles Evans Hughes Woodrow Wilson
Party Republican Democratic
Home state New York New Jersey
Running mate Charles W. Fairbanks Thomas R. Marshall
Electoral vote50
Popular vote64,21759,191
Percentage49.80%45.91%

South Dakota Presidential Election Results 1916.svg
County Results

President before election

Woodrow Wilson
Democratic

Elected President

Woodrow Wilson
Democratic

The 1916 United States presidential election in South Dakota took place on November 7, 1916, as part of the 1916 United States presidential election in which all contemporary forty-eight states participated. Voters chose five electors, or representatives to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Contents

South Dakota voted for the Republican nominee, Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes of New York, over the Democratic nominee, incumbent President Woodrow Wilson of New Jersey. Hughes won South Dakota by a close margin of 3.90%; alongside Oregon, South Dakota was the only state that Hughes won in the Great Plains or westward.

Hughes’ victory was largely due to the powerful GOP loyalty of East River German-Americans, who feared that Wilson's pro-British and pro-French sentiments would lead the United States to involve itself in war with Germany. [1] In contrast, the more Anglo-Saxon West River counties strongly supported Wilson's Southern roots and prohibitionist leanings. [2] Despite his loss, Wilson's 45.91% was the best performance in the state by a Democrat since William Jennings Bryan won the state in a fusion with the Populist Party two decades before, and would be beaten only six times in the ensuing century.

As of the 2020 presidential election , this is the last election that Lawrence County voted for the Democratic presidential candidate, and the last election that South Dakota voted for a different presidential candidate than neighboring North Dakota. [3] [4]

Results

Presidential Candidate Running Mate PartyElectoral Vote (EV)Popular Vote (PV)
Charles Evans Hughes Charles W. Fairbanks Republican 5 [5] 64,21749.80%
Woodrow Wilson Thomas R. Marshall Democratic 059,19145.91%
Allan L. Benson George R. Kirkpatrick Socialist 03,7602.92%
James Hanly Ira Landrith Prohibition 01,7741.38%

Results by county

County [6] Charles Evans Hughes
Republican
Thomas Woodrow Wilson
Democratic
Allan Louis Benson
Socialist
James Franklin Hanly
Prohibition
MarginTotal votes cast
# %# %# %# %# %
Aurora 73546.05%79349.69%231.44%452.82%-58-3.63%1,596
Beadle 1,66245.72%1,82850.29%1213.33%240.66%-166-4.57%3,635
Bennett 6722.56%22274.75%41.35%41.35%-155-52.19%297
Bon Homme 1,23147.92%1,27849.75%401.56%200.78%-47-1.83%2,569
Brookings 1,63851.79%1,38543.79%461.45%942.97%2538.00%3,163
Brown 2,65945.19%2,67645.48%4728.02%771.31%-17-0.29%5,884
Brule 72941.66%97555.71%402.29%60.34%-246-14.06%1,750
Buffalo 8030.19%18268.68%10.38%20.75%-102-38.49%265
Butte 53733.31%93057.69%1358.37%100.62%-393-24.38%1,612
Campbell 64477.40%16319.59%141.68%111.32%48157.81%832
Charles Mix 1,45041.26%2,01157.23%411.17%120.34%-561-15.96%3,514
Clark 1,22652.71%1,01643.68%281.20%562.41%2109.03%2,326
Clay 1,00044.52%1,20753.74%251.11%140.62%-207-9.22%2,246
Codington 1,55051.82%1,34444.93%471.57%501.67%2066.89%2,991
Corson 50342.20%64153.78%413.44%70.59%-138-11.58%1,192
Custer 39242.11%48852.42%505.37%10.11%-96-10.31%931
Davison 1,51650.48%1,37445.75%672.23%461.53%1424.73%3,003
Day 1,75861.21%90731.58%1214.21%862.99%85129.63%2,872
Deuel 90859.35%58438.17%140.92%241.57%32421.18%1,530
Dewey 35247.00%37950.60%141.87%40.53%-27-3.60%749
Douglas 81557.48%59742.10%30.21%30.21%21815.37%1,418
Edmunds 89455.46%63439.33%412.54%432.67%26016.13%1,612
Fall River 66840.63%92256.08%442.68%100.61%-254-15.45%1,644
Faulk 75952.89%62943.83%251.74%221.53%1309.06%1,435
Grant 1,09855.31%77238.89%482.42%673.38%32616.42%1,985
Gregory 1,43451.86%1,24244.92%722.60%170.61%1926.94%2,765
Haakon 39941.05%47548.87%868.85%121.23%-76-7.82%972
Hamlin 1,03957.82%69238.51%301.67%362.00%34719.31%1,797
Hand 80144.95%90550.79%492.75%271.52%-104-5.84%1,782
Hanson 76751.10%71247.44%90.60%130.87%553.66%1,501
Harding 52041.57%59747.72%1199.51%151.20%-77-6.16%1,251
Hughes 61151.13%53644.85%393.26%90.75%756.28%1,195
Hutchinson 1,63673.20%51923.22%532.37%271.21%1,11749.98%2,235
Hyde 43855.58%30538.71%405.08%50.63%13316.88%788
Jackson 28349.39%27948.69%61.05%50.87%40.70%573
Jerauld 61248.42%58946.60%50.40%584.59%231.82%1,264
Kingsbury 1,33951.80%1,09642.40%702.71%803.09%2439.40%2,585
Lake 1,39855.04%1,02740.43%923.62%230.91%37114.61%2,540
Lawrence 2,07447.51%2,15749.42%1142.61%200.46%-83-1.90%4,365
Lincoln 1,59160.29%93635.47%622.35%501.89%65524.82%2,639
Lyman 98145.65%1,05248.95%994.61%170.79%-71-3.30%2,149
Marshall 80845.57%88549.92%563.16%241.35%-77-4.34%1,773
McCook 1,19452.19%1,02144.62%492.14%241.05%1737.56%2,288
McPherson 99280.06%22418.08%161.29%70.56%76861.99%1,239
Meade 85838.25%1,22454.57%1416.29%200.89%-366-16.32%2,243
Mellette 37945.55%43652.40%151.80%20.24%-57-6.85%832
Miner 1,00652.21%88045.67%241.25%170.88%1266.54%1,927
Minnehaha 4,31852.64%3,49442.59%1972.40%1942.36%82410.05%8,203
Moody 97349.09%89845.31%894.49%221.11%753.78%1,982
Pennington 1,10842.73%1,33951.64%1224.70%240.93%-231-8.91%2,593
Perkins 89045.41%93947.91%1186.02%130.66%-49-2.50%1,960
Potter 51254.58%40843.50%70.75%111.17%10411.09%938
Roberts 1,25947.17%1,19144.62%1877.01%321.20%682.55%2,669
Sanborn 71142.00%89853.04%281.65%563.31%-187-11.05%1,693
Spink 1,66048.61%1,62247.50%742.17%591.73%381.11%3,415
Stanley 25438.25%38157.38%192.86%101.51%-127-19.13%664
Sully 28150.45%26848.11%81.44%00.00%132.33%557
Tripp 1,07443.57%1,34154.40%401.62%100.41%-267-10.83%2,465
Turner 1,57356.93%1,13441.04%180.65%381.38%43915.89%2,763
Union 1,10844.95%1,31353.27%190.77%251.01%-205-8.32%2,465
Walworth 76155.03%59042.66%282.02%40.29%17112.36%1,383
Yankton 1,42948.66%1,43848.96%451.53%250.85%-9-0.31%2,937
Ziebach 27554.89%21142.12%102.00%51.00%6412.77%501
Totals64,21749.80%59,19145.91%3,7602.92%1,7741.38%5,0263.90%128,942

See also

References

  1. Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 419-420 ISBN   9780691163246
  2. Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 424
  3. Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, pp. 294-298 ISBN   0786422173
  4. Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
  5. "1916 Presidential General Election Results – South Dakota". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
  6. South Dakota Secretary of State; ‘Official Vote of South Dakota by Counties November Election, 1916’; South Dakota Manual 1917, pp. 458-461