Pompey's campaign against the pirates

Last updated
Pompey's campaign against the pirates
Part of the wars of the Roman Republic
(Venice) Pompey the Great, Museo Archeologico Nazionale.jpg
Bust of Pompey, copy of an original from 70–60 BC, Venice National Archaeological Museum
Date67 BC
Location
Result Roman victory
Belligerents
Roman Republic and Rhodes [1] Cilician pirates
Commanders and leaders
Pompey
Strength
270 [2] /500 [3] ships
120,000 soldiers [2] [3]
4,000 [2] /5,000 [3] horsemen
More than 1,000 ships [4]
Casualties and losses
377 [5] /800 ships captured [6]
10,000 dead [5]
20,000 captured [7]
120 cities captured [5]

Pompey's campaign against the pirates represented the final phase of the Roman Republic's efforts to combat piracy in the eastern Mediterranean, which had been adversely affecting the eastern Roman provinces. This campaign was completed in approximately 40 days under the command of Pompey in 67 B.C. [1] [8]

Contents

The pirates no longer sailed in small groups, but in large hosts, and they had their own commanders, who increased their fame [by their exploits]. They despoiled and plundered first of all those who sailed, not leaving them alone even in winter [...]; then also those who were in the ports. And if one dared to challenge them on the open sea, he was usually defeated and destroyed. If he then managed to beat them, he was unable to capture them, because of the speed of their ships. So the pirates would go right back and loot and burn not only villages and farms, but whole towns, while others made them allies, so much so that they wintered there and set up bases for new operations, as if it were a friendly country.

Cassius Dio, Roman History, XXXVI, 21.1-3.

Historical context

Rome's first intervention in the Aegean Sea in response to piracy occurred in 189 B.C., when Lucius Fabius Labeo, commander of the fleet, undertook a mission on the island of Crete. However, he was unsuccessful in securing the return of Roman citizens who had been captured by pirates.

Subsequent Roman interventions took place in the seas around Asia Minor following the establishment of the first province in the East, Asia (133—129 B.C.). In 102 B.C., the consul Marcus Antonius [9] led a campaign in the Cilician area. His reported successes against pirate populations culminated in the establishment of a second Roman province, Cilicia, between 101 and 100 B.C. The latter province [10] [11] initially consisted of Lycaonia, [10] Pisidia, [12] Pamphylia, [12] southeastern Phrygia, [12] and part of Cilicia Trachea, although its coastline remained partially surrounded with pirates. [10]

During the First Mithridatic War, Roman commander Quintus Brucius Sura initially faced Metrophanes with a small army, engaging in a naval confrontation in which he succeeded in sinking a large ship. [13] He subsequently conducted raids on the harbor of Skiathos, a known pirate stronghold, where he executed slaves and mutilated freedmen who sought refuge there in 87 B.C. [14] In the following years, from 86 to 85 BC, Sulla's legatus, Lucullus, was sent to collect a fleet consisting of ships from Cyprus, Phoenicia, Rhodes and Pamphylia. He faced multiple risks of capture by pirates while successfully ravaging much of their coastline. [15]

The second Roman province of Asia, Cilicia, conquered by Marcus Antonius during the military campaigns of 102 BC. Roma in Oriente 101aC.png
The second Roman province of Asia, Cilicia, conquered by Marcus Antonius during the military campaigns of 102 BC.

At the conclusion of the First Mithridatic War, the province of Asia was left in a state of significant distress. The conflict had subjected its territories to persistent assaults by numerous pirate bands, which operated more like organized fleets than mere brigands. Mithridates VI had facilitated this increase in piracy during his campaign against the Roman coasts, anticipating that he would not maintain control over these regions for long. Consequently, the number of pirates surged, leading to continuous attacks on ports, fortresses, and cities. [16] The pirates captured several cities, including Iassus, Samos, Clazomenae, and even Samothrace, where Sulla was present at the time. It was reported that they plundered the temple on Samothrace, which housed treasures valued at 1,000 Attic talents. [17] Plutarch noted that the number of pirate ships exceeded 1,000, and the settlements they overtook totaled at least 400. They attacked and looted previously untouched locations, including sanctuaries such as those at Claros, Didyma, and Samothrace, as well as temples dedicated to Chthonia Terra at Hermione, Asclepius at Epidaurus, and Poseidon at Isthmus, Taenarum, and Kalaureia. They also defiled temples of Apollo at Actium and Lefkada, and those of Hera at Samos, Argos, and Lacinium. Additionally, they engaged in unusual sacrifices at Olympus and celebrated secret rites, including those dedicated to Mitra. [4]

Between 78 B.C. and 75 B.C., Publius Servilius Vatia served as proconsul of Cilicia, [18] [19] achieving significant victories against the pirates, who were equipped with fast, light warships, ultimately forcing them to retreat into the Isauric hinterland. [20] Vatia, an energetic and resolute commander, swiftly captured the city of Olympus in Lycia from the pirate leader Zenicetus, who died defending it. He then advanced through Pamphylia, seizing Phaselis, and entered Cilicia, where he took the coastal fortress of Corycus. After reclaiming all the coastal cities from the pirates, Vatia led his army across the Taurus Mountains, marking the first Roman incursion into the region, and aimed for the Isaurian capital of Isaura. He achieved this by diverting a river to deprive the city of water, successfully capturing it. For his commendable leadership, he was acclaimed imperator by his troops and awarded the Isauric agnomen . [21] Upon his return to Rome, he celebrated his triumph in 74 B.C.. [22] It is also noted that the young Julius Caesar participated in these campaigns as a military tribune. [23] However, following these victories, new pirate raids targeted the city of Brindisi and the Etruscan resulting in the abduction of women from noble Roman families and even a few praetors. [18]

Bust of Caesar, who was seized by pirates in 74 BC. Caesar.jpg
Bust of Caesar, who was seized by pirates in 74 BC.

In 74 B.C., Marcus Antonius Creticus, the father of Mark Antony, led an expedition to the seas around Crete, which ultimately ended in defeat. Following this, Quintus Caecilius Metellus Creticus undertook a new campaign, supported by the cities of Gortina (now Gortyn) and Polyrrhenion, which gradually subdued the main centers of anti-Roman resistance, including Cydonia, Knossos, Eleutera, Lappa, Lytto, and Hierapytna. This campaign faced challenges due to conflicts between Quintus Metellus and Lucius Octavius, [24] a legate sent to the island by Pompey, who held extraordinary command against the pirates under the Gabinia law (lex Gabinia). After the successful conquest of Crete, Quintus Caecilius Metellus adopted the surname "Creticus." [25] [26] During this period, a notable incident involving the young Julius Caesar occurred. While en route to Rhodes in 74 B.C.—a destination favored by young Romans seeking to learn Greek culture and philosophy— [27] he was kidnapped by pirates and taken to the island of Farmakonisi, located among the southern Sporades south of Miletus. [28] When the pirates demanded a ransom of talents, Caesar countered that he would pay fifty talents and sent his companions to Miletus to collect the necessary funds. He chose to remain on Farmakonisi with two slaves and his personal physician. [29] During his thirty-eight days in captivity, Caesar composed numerous poems, which he presented to his captors. [30] He interacted with the pirates in a manner that suggested he was in command, repeatedly promising that he would have them executed once he regained his freedom. [31] When Caesar's companions returned with the ransom money, he escaped to the province of Asia, where Marcus Iuncus served as propraetor. [32] [33] Upon reaching Miletus, Caesar equipped ships and returned to Farmakonisi, easily capturing the pirates. He then transported them to Bithynia, where Iuncus was managing the implementation of Nicomedes IV in his will. Although Caesar requested that the propraetor punish the pirates, Iuncus attempted to seize the ransom money for himself, [34] and planned to resell the captives. [35] Anticipating Iuncus's actions, Caesar set sail from Bithynia and executed the pirates himself, having them crucified after strangling them to spare them a prolonged death. [36] According to pro-Cesarian sources, this act fulfilled his promise to the pirates during their captivity and allowed him to return the ransom money that his comrades had secured. [37] [38]

In 70 B.C., Praetor Caecilius Metellus successfully confronted the pirates surrounding the seas of Sicily [18] [39] and Campania, [40] who had even sacked Gaeta, Ostia [41] (in 69–68 B.C.) and had kidnapped the daughter of Marcus Antonius at Cape Miseno.

Casus belli

By 69 B.C., Pompey had become a favored figure among the Roman masses, although many members of the optimates were wary of his intentions. His prominence in the state was bolstered by two extraordinary proconsular appointments, unprecedented in Roman history. In 67 BC, two years after serving as consul, Pompey was appointed commander of a special fleet tasked with conducting a campaign against the pirates surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. [42] The Cilician pirates, in particular, had disrupted trade and relations among various populations, leading to widespread conflict and significant repercussions for maritime commerce, including the vital grain supply for the city of Rome. [18] This situation had largely resulted from the Mithridatic Wars, which allowed these pirate bands to operate with impunity, plundering ports, cities, and merchant ships. Initially, the pirates, led by their commander Isodorus, restricted their activities to nearby waters, including those around Crete, Cyrene, Achaia, and Cape Maleas. The immense wealth derived from their plundering earned these waters the moniker "Golden Sea", but they eventually expanded their range of operations. [43]

Pompey's appointment was controversial from the outset. The conservative faction in the Senate expressed suspicion regarding his intentions and feared the consolidation of his power. The optimates made numerous attempts to block his nomination. Notably, Julius Caesar was among the few senators who supported Pompey's leadership from the beginning. The nomination was ultimately advanced by the tribune of the plebs, Aulus Gabinius, who proposed the Lex Gabinia. This law granted Pompey command of the war against the Mediterranean pirates for a period of three years, [44] conferring extensive powers that included absolute control over maritime operations and the coasts extending 400 stadia inland (approximately 70 km. [2] [45] This authority placed him above any military leader in the eastern provinces. [42] In addition to these powers, Pompey was authorized to select 15 legates from the Senate to oversee key maritime areas, [46] draw funds from the public treasury and tax collectors as needed, and command a fleet of 200 fully armed and equipped ships, including soldiers and oarsmen. [47]

Forces in the field

Romans

General map of the Bellum piraticum with its commanders, by territorial area Bellum piraticum Pompeii 67 aC.png
General map of the Bellum piraticum with its commanders, by territorial area

According to the provisions set forth by the Senate, the army that Pompey could assemble for deployment throughout the Mediterranean was initially expected to comprise 500 ships, [48] 120,000 armed men (approximately equivalent to 30 legions), and 5,000 cavalry. These forces would be under the command of 24 praetors and 2 quaestors, [3] with a total budget of 1,000 Attic talents. [2] Historical accounts indicate that Pompey sought assistance from the fleet of the Rhodians as well. [1] In practice, however, the forces available to Pompey amounted to no more than 270 ships (including hemiolias), [2] 4,000 horsemen, [2] and 120,000 infantry. [2] These troops were commanded by either 14 legates, as reported by Florus, [49] or 25, according to Appian. [2] The legates and their assigned areas of command included:

  1. Gellius (consul in 72 BC), in charge of the Tuscan Sea; [49] [50]
  2. Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus in the upper Adriatic Sea, [50] in whose employ may have been Pompey's young sons (Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Sextus Pompey) and not, as Florus would have it, the latter placed to guard the Egyptian Sea; [49] [51]
  3. Plotius Varus on the Sea of Sicily; [49] [50]
  4. Atilius in the Ligurian Sea (according to Florus [49] ) or the Sardinian-Corsica Sea (according to Appian [50] );
  5. Pomponius in Gallia Narbonensis; [49] [50]
  6. Torquatus in the Balearic Sea; [49] [50]
  7. Tiberius Nero in the Strait of Gades; [49] [50]
  8. Lentulus Marcellinus on the Libyan-African Sea; [49] [50]
  9. Terentius Varro on the lower Adriatic to Acarnania; [49] [50]
  10. Lucius Sisenna on the Peloponnese, Attica, Euboea, Thessaly, Macedonia and Boeotia; [50]
  11. Lucius Lollius on the upper Aegean and its islands to the Hellespont; [50]
  12. Publius Piso over Pontus Euxinus in the seas of Thrace and Bithynia, north of the Propontis; [50]
  13. Metellus over the eastern Aegean, southern Ionia, Lycia, Pamphylia, Cyprus, and Phoenicia; [49] [50]
  14. Cepion over the Asiatic Sea; [49]
  15. Cato the Younger was to close the Propontis passages. [49]

Pirates

Plutarch reports that by the end of the First Mithridatic War, pirate ships had increased to over 1,000 and had sacked or occupied at least 400 cities. [4] Below is how Appian describes them:

Model of a Roman trireme, also used by pirates. Trireme 1.jpg
Model of a Roman trireme, also used by pirates.

In the beginning [the pirates] roamed around with a couple of small boats, worrying the inhabitants of the area as [they were] thieves. As the war went on, they became more and more numerous and built larger ships. Having big gains, they did not stop [engaging in piracy] when Mithridates was defeated and called for peace, and then withdrew [from the conquered territories]. Having lost both their livelihood and their country due to the war, having fallen into extreme misery, they used the sea instead of land-holding; at first using vessels such as the pinnaces and the hemiolias, then with biremi and triremi, which sailed in actual squads under pirate leaders who were like the generals of an army. They occupied an unfortified city. They tore down the walls of the others, captured after a regular siege, looting them. They then took the wealthiest citizens away to their hidden headquarters, holding them hostage and demanding their ransom. They scorned the appellation of thieves, describing their spoils as war prizes. They had chained artisans to do work for them, and continually bringing them materials of wood, brass and iron.

Appian of Alexandria, Mithridatic Wars, 92.

Fueled by their easy successes, the pirates chose not to abandon their way of life after the war; instead, they began to see themselves as kings, tyrants, and formidable armies. They believed that their unity rendered them invincible and thus embarked on constructing ships and weapons to bolster their strength. The pirates established their headquarters at Cragus in Cilicia (modern-day Coracesium), which they selected as their main anchorage and encampment. They fortified their position with towers and built fortresses, claiming control over various islands throughout the Mediterranean. The rugged coastline of Cilicia, characterized by sheer cliffs and few safe mooring points, served as an ideal base for their operations. This geographical reality led to the collective label of "Cilicians" for the pirates, despite the fact that some hailed from regions such as Syria, Cyprus, Pamphylia, Pontus, and other eastern territories. [52] Over time, their numbers swelled into the tens of thousands, spreading throughout the Mediterranean as far as the Pillars of Hercules. [18]

War

Pompey undertook the task of dividing the entire Mediterranean Basin into at least 15 districts, each assigned a specific number of ships and a designated commander. With his forces distributed across the various sectors surrounded by pirate fleets, he began his campaign by pursuing the enemy in the western regions. [50] He successfully tracked down their headquarters and captured a significant number of their vessels, ultimately laying siege to the coast of Cilicia, in the East. For the operations against the pirates in Cilicia, Pompey chose to lead the charge personally with his 60 best ships. Initially, he focused on the western pirate strongholds, completely subduing them within just forty days. [50] This successful campaign encompassed the Tyrrhenian Sea, Libyan Sea, Sea of Sardinia, Sea of Corsica, and the of Sicily, a feat accomplished through his relentless energy and the dedication of his lieutenants. [50] [53] After concluding these initial operations, Pompey made a brief stop in Rome before heading to Brindisi. He then turned his attention to the eastern pirate strongholds, which were significantly larger in terms of numbers, ships, and armaments, indicating a more formidable challenge ahead. [50]

Some of the bands of pirates who were still free but asked for forgiveness were treated humanely [by Pompey], so much so that after their ships were seized and people handed over, no further harm was done to them; the others then had hope of being forgiven, tried to escape from the other commanders, and went to Pompey with their wives and children, surrendering to him. All these were spared, and through their help all those who were still free in their hiding places were tracked down, seized, and punished, as they knew they had committed unforgivable crimes.

Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 27.4.

The most numerous and powerful bands of pirates had sought refuge with their families and treasures in fortified fortresses and citadels near the Taurus Mountains. They awaited Pompey's impending attack near the promontory of Coracesium in Cilicia (modern Alanya), where they initially faced defeat in battle before being besieged. Ultimately, the pirates opted to send ambassadors to the Roman proconsul, leading to their surrender along with the rebellious cities and islands under their control, which had often proven difficult to capture. [50] [54] The campaign against piracy concluded in less than three months, resulting in the surrender of all pirate ships—71 captured and 306 surrendered—some of which had brass bows. [5] Over 20,000 pirates were taken prisoner, with an additional 10,000 killed during the conflict. [5] Rather than executing the captured pirates, Pompey chose to detain them, recognizing that allowing them to go free could lead to the reformation of disorganized and belligerent bands, posing a significant threat for the future. [5] [7] [55]

Reflecting, then, that by nature man is not and does not become a savage or asocial creature, but is transformed by the unnatural practice of vice; where he can be softened by new customs through the change of place and life, then, if even ferocious beasts can extinguish their ferocious and savage way of being when these live in a gentler way of life, [Pompey] decided to transfer the men from the sea to the land, allowing them to live in a gentler way of life, in cities and cultivating the land. Some of them, therefore, were welcomed and integrated into the small, semi-deserted cities of Cilicia, to which he added additional territories; after rebuilding the city of Soli, [56] which had recently been devastated by Tigrane, king of Armenia, Pompey settled many of them there. For most of them, however, he gave as his residence the city of Dyme in Achaia, [5] which was then devoid of men and had much good land.

Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 28.3-4.

Pompey resettled some of the captured pirates in the cities of Mallus, Adana, and Epiphanea. [5] Meanwhile, Metellus was engaged in eradicating piracy in Crete, a task he had undertaken before Pompey was assigned command of the anti-piracy campaign. Metellus was related to the Metellus who had previously served alongside Pompey in Hispania. Crete was considered a significant second base for piracy, following Cilicia in importance. Although Metellus had killed many pirates, he had yet to completely eliminate their presence. [57] According to Plutarch, the surviving pirates under siege by Roman forces sent messages appealing to Pompey for assistance. Accepting their invitation, Pompey instructed Metellus to suspend the siege and dispatched one of his legates, Lucius Octavius, to engage with the pirates. Octavius entered three of the pirates' strongholds and fought alongside them, which resulted in Pompey appearing vulnerable and envious of Metellus’s accomplishments. [58] However, Metellus did not yield to this rivalry. He ultimately succeeded in capturing and punishing the remaining pirates, even sending Octavius back after having insulted and beaten him in front of the army. [59]

Consequences

Mithridates depicted in a first-century Roman statue, now in the Louvre Museum. Mithridates VI Louvre white background.jpg
Mithridates depicted in a first-century Roman statue, now in the Louvre Museum.

Pompey's forces successfully purged the entire Mediterranean Basin of pirates, reclaiming key territories including the island of Crete, the coasts of Lycia, Pamphylia, and Cilicia. His military efforts reflected effective discipline and organizational skills, culminating in the control of Cilicia, which had been a center of piracy for over forty years. Following these actions, Tarsus was established as the capital of the newly formed Roman province, and Pompey oversaw the foundation of 39 new cities. [6] The rapid pace of his campaign highlighted his talents as a naval general with strong logistical capabilities.

Subsequently, Pompey was commissioned to lead a new military campaign against Mithridates VI, king of Pontus, in the East. [60] This command effectively tasked Pompey with the conquest and reorganization of the entire eastern Mediterranean, further solidifying his influence. Supported by Caesar, Pompey conducted his campaigns from 65 BC to 62 BC with remarkable military prowess and administrative efficiency, resulting in the annexation of much of Asia under firm Roman control.

In addition to defeating Mithridates, Pompey also vanquished Tigranes the Great, king of Armenia, with whom he negotiated treaties. He conquered Syria, then under the rule of Antiochus XIII, and swiftly advanced towards Jerusalem, which he occupied in a short period. Pompey implemented a comprehensive reorganization of the newly acquired eastern provinces, taking into account the geographical and political dynamics necessary for establishing a Roman frontier in the East. Through his campaigns, which included victories over Mithridates, Tigranes II, and Antiochus XIII) Pontus and Syria became Roman provinces, and Jerusalem was brought under Roman control.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Antony</span> Roman politician and general (83–30 BC)

Marcus Antonius, commonly known in English as Mark Antony, was a Roman politician and general who played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic from a constitutional republic into the autocratic Roman Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pompey</span> Roman general and statesman (106–48 BC)

Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, known in English as Pompey or Pompey the Great, was a general and statesman of the Roman Republic. He played a significant role in the transformation of Rome from republic to empire. Early in his career, he was a partisan and protégé of the Roman general and dictator Sulla; later, he became the political ally, and finally the enemy, of Julius Caesar.

This article concerns the period 79 BC – 70 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcus Junius Brutus</span> Roman politician and assassin of Julius Caesar

Marcus Junius Brutus was a Roman politician, orator, and the most famous of the assassins of Julius Caesar. After being adopted by a relative, he used the name Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus, which was retained as his legal name. He is often referred to simply as Brutus.

Gaius Asinius Pollio was a Roman soldier, politician, orator, poet, playwright, literary critic, and historian, whose lost contemporaneous history provided much of the material used by the historians Appian and Plutarch. Pollio was most famously a patron of Virgil and a friend of Horace and poems to him were dedicated by both men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lucullus</span> Roman politician and general (118–57/56 BC)

Lucius Licinius Lucullus was a Roman general and statesman, closely connected with Lucius Cornelius Sulla. In culmination of over 20 years of almost continuous military and government service, he conquered the eastern kingdoms in the course of the Third Mithridatic War, exhibiting extraordinary generalship in diverse situations, most famously during the Siege of Cyzicus in 73–72 BC, and at the Battle of Tigranocerta in Armenian Arzanene in 69 BC. His command style received unusually favourable attention from ancient military experts, and his campaigns appear to have been studied as examples of skilful generalship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pharnaces II of Pontus</span> Bosporan king from 63 to 47 BC

Pharnaces II of Pontus was the king of the Bosporan Kingdom and Kingdom of Pontus until his death. He was a monarch of Persian and Greek ancestry. He was the youngest child born to King Mithridates VI of Pontus from his first wife, his sister Queen Laodice. He was born and raised in the Kingdom of Pontus and was the namesake of his late double great grandfather Pharnaces I of Pontus. After his father was defeated by the Romans in the Third Mithridatic War and died in 63 BC, the Romans annexed the western part of Pontus, merged it with the former Kingdom of Bithynia and formed the Roman province of Bithynia and Pontus. The eastern part of Pontus remained under the rule of Pharnaces as a client kingdom until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third Servile War</span> Major slave rebellion against the Roman Republic (73–71 BC)

The Third Servile War, also called the Gladiator War and the War of Spartacus by Plutarch, was the last in a series of slave rebellions against the Roman Republic known as the Servile Wars. This third rebellion was the only one that directly threatened the Roman heartland of Italy. It was particularly alarming to Rome because its military seemed powerless to suppress it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mithridatic Wars</span> Conflicts between Rome and Pontus (88–63 BCE)

The Mithridatic Wars were three conflicts fought by the Roman Republic against the Kingdom of Pontus and its allies between 88 and 63 BCE. They are named after Mithridates VI, the King of Pontus during the course of the wars, who initiated the hostilities with Rome. Mithridates led the Pontic forces in every war. The Romans were led by various generals and consuls throughout the wars, namely Lucius Cornelius Sulla, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, and Gnaeus Pompey Magnus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illyricum (Roman province)</span> Roman province from 27 BC to 69/79 AD

Illyricum was a Roman province that existed from 27 BC to sometime during the reign of Vespasian. The province comprised Illyria/Dalmatia in the south and Pannonia in the north. Illyria included the area along the east coast of the Adriatic Sea and its inland mountains, eventually being named Dalmatia. Pannonia included the northern plains that now are a part of Serbia, Croatia and Hungary. The area roughly corresponded to part or all of the territories of today's Albania, Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Slovenia.

Polemon I Pythodoros was the Roman Client King of Cilicia, Pontus, Colchis and the Bosporan Kingdom. Polemon was the son and heir of Zenon and possibly Tryphaena. Zenon and Polemon adorned Laodicea with many dedicated offerings.

Publius Servilius Vatia Isauricus, was a politician and general of the Roman Republic and a member of the plebeian branch of the gens Servilii. He was elected consul for 79 BC with Appius Claudius Pulcher as his consular collegae. From 78 to 74 BC, as proconsul of Cilicia, he fought against the Cilician Pirates and Isaurian hill tribes in Asia Minor. He was granted the agnomen Isauricus for his victories over the Isaurians. Upon returning to Rome he celebrated a triumph for his victories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quintus Labienus</span> 1st-century BCE Roman general

Quintus Labienus Parthicus was a Roman general in the Late Republic period. The son of Titus Labienus, he made an alliance with Parthia and invaded the Roman provinces in the eastern Mediterranean which were under the control of Mark Antony. He occupied the Roman province of Syria together with the Parthians in 40 BC. He then pushed into southern Anatolia, still with Parthian support. The main Parthian force took charge of Syria and invaded Judea. Both Labienus and the Parthians were defeated by Publius Ventidius Bassus, who recovered these provinces for Mark Antony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cilician pirates</span> Generic term used for all pirates of the Mediterranean Sea in the 2nd and 1st century BC

Cilician pirates dominated the Mediterranean Sea from the 2nd century BC until their suppression by Pompey in 67–66 BC. Because there were notorious pirate strongholds in Cilicia, on the southern coast of Asia Minor, the term "Cilician" was long used to generically refer to any pirates in the Mediterranean.

Marcus Favonius was a Roman politician during the period of the fall of the Roman Republic. He is noted for his imitation of Cato the Younger, his espousal of the Cynic philosophy, and for his appearance as the Poet in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar.

The career of Julius Caesar before his consulship in 59 BC was characterized by military adventurism and political persecution. Julius Caesar was born on 12 July 100 BC into a patrician family, the gens Julia, which claimed descent from Iulus, son of the legendary Trojan prince Aeneas, supposedly the son of the goddess Venus. His father died when he was just 16, leaving Caesar as the head of the household. His family status put him at odds with the Dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla, who almost had him executed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military campaigns of Julius Caesar</span> Caesars military campaigns of 58–50 and 49–45 BC

The military campaigns of Julius Caesar were a series of wars that reshaped the political landscape of the Roman Republic, expanded its territories, and ultimately paved the way for the transition from republic to empire. The wars constituted both the Gallic Wars and Caesar's civil war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caucasian campaign of Pompey</span> Part of Pompeys eastern campaigns

Caucasian campaign of Pompey was a military campaign led by Pompey that took place in 65 BC and was a consequence of the third Mithridatic War fought over Georgian lands and its neighboring frontiers. Rome sought to expand its influence and establish itself as the overlord of the Middle East. After conquering the Kingdom of Pontus and receiving the subjugation of Tigranes II of Armenia the Romans marched on the Kingdom of Iberia, whose king, Artoces had been an ally of Mithridates VI of Pontus, Rome's premier enemy during the 80's, 70's and early 60's BC.

The Battle off Carteia was a minor naval battle during the latter stages of Caesar's civil war won by the Caesarians led by Caesar's legate Gaius Didius against the Pompeians led by Publius Attius Varus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pontic War</span>

The Pontic War of 48–47 BC was an armed conflict between Rome and the king of Bosporus and Pontus, Pharnaces II, who tried to restore the kingdom of Mithridates VI.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Florus , p. 7)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 94.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 26.2.
  4. 1 2 3 Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 24.4-5.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 96.
  6. 1 2 Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 45.2.
  7. 1 2 Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 28.2.
  8. Livy , p. 99.2)
  9. Livy , p. 68.1)
  10. 1 2 3 Piganiol (1989 , p. 298)
  11. Crawford (2008 , p. 91)
  12. 1 2 3 Piganiol (1989 , p. 618, n. 11)
  13. Brizzi (1997 , p. 324)
  14. Plutarch, Life of Sulla, 11.4-5.
  15. Plutarch, Life of Sulla, 24.1.
  16. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 24.1-3.
  17. Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 63.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 93.
  19. Livy, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 90.
  20. Florus, I, 41, 4.
  21. Florus, I, 41, 5.
  22. Fasti triumphales .
  23. Canfora, p. 5.
  24. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 18-19.
  25. Fasti Triumphales = AE 1889, 70 = AE 1930, 60 = CIL I, p.341.
  26. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 17.a.
  27. Canfora, p. 8.
  28. Velleius Paterculus, II,42
  29. Suetonius, Caesar, 4; Plutarch, Caesar, 2,1.
  30. Canfora, p. 9.
  31. Plutarch, Caesar, 2.4
  32. Velleius Paterculus, Roman History, II, 42.3; Plutarch, Caesar, 2.6.
  33. Velleius Paterculus, Roman History, II, 42.2.; Polyenus, VIII, 23.1.
  34. Plutarch, Caesar, 4.7.
  35. Velleius Paterculus, II, 42.3.
  36. Suetonius, Caesar, 74.1.
  37. Polyenus, VIII, 23.1.
  38. Plutarch, Caesar, 2.7.
  39. Livy, Periochae ab Urbe condita libri, 98.3.
  40. Florus, I, 41, 6.
  41. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 22.2.
  42. 1 2 Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 25.1-2.
  43. Florus, I, 41, 1-3.
  44. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 23.4-5; 24-37.
  45. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 36bis.
  46. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 37.1.
  47. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 25.3.
  48. Cicero, De Imperio Cn. Pompei ad Quirites oratio, 35.
  49. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Florus, I, 41, 9-10.
  50. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 95.
  51. Leach, p. 70.
  52. Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 92.
  53. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 26.3-4.
  54. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 28.1.
  55. Florus, I, 41, 12-15.
  56. Cassius Dio, XXXVI, 37.6.
  57. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 29.1.
  58. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 29.2-3.
  59. Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 29.5.
  60. Appian, Mithridatic Wars, 91.

Bibliography