Demographics
Historical population| Census | Pop. | Note | %± |
|---|
| 1860 | 2,763 | | — |
|---|
| 1870 | 3,778 | | 36.7% |
|---|
| 1880 | 5,892 | | 56.0% |
|---|
| 1890 | 10,048 | | 70.5% |
|---|
| 1900 | 18,664 | | 85.7% |
|---|
| 1910 | 19,147 | | 2.6% |
|---|
| 1920 | 23,863 | | 24.6% |
|---|
| 1930 | 21,094 | | −11.6% |
|---|
| 1940 | 21,374 | | 1.3% |
|---|
| 1950 | 19,357 | | −9.4% |
|---|
| 1960 | 16,682 | | −13.8% |
|---|
| 1970 | 14,770 | | −11.5% |
|---|
| 1980 | 18,064 | | 22.3% |
|---|
| 1990 | 19,745 | | 9.3% |
|---|
| 2000 | 21,967 | | 11.3% |
|---|
| 2010 | 21,679 | | −1.3% |
|---|
| 2020 | 20,784 | | −4.1% |
|---|
| 2024 (est.) | 20,262 | [6] | −2.5% |
|---|
|
2020 census
As of the 2020 census, the county had a population of 20,784, and the census counted 5,896 families residing in the county. The median age was 42.3 years. 20.9% of residents were under the age of 18 and 19.4% of residents were 65 years of age or older. For every 100 females there were 92.4 males, and for every 100 females age 18 and over there were 91.0 males age 18 and over. 29.6% of residents lived in urban areas, while 70.4% lived in rural areas. [17] [18]
The racial makeup of the county was 69.9% White, 25.4% Black or African American, 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.4% Asian, 0.0% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, 0.8% from some other race, and 3.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race comprised 1.8% of the population. [19]
There were 8,183 households in the county, of which 29.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them and 30.4% had a female householder with no spouse or partner present. About 26.1% of all households were made up of individuals and 12.6% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. [18]
There were 9,244 housing units, of which 11.5% were vacant. Among occupied housing units, 71.3% were owner-occupied and 28.7% were renter-occupied. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.0% and the rental vacancy rate was 9.1%. [18]
Politics
[21]
The county seat, Sylvester, serves as the political and administrative hub, where local governance focuses on addressing the needs of its approximately 21,000 residents. The county government is structured around a Board of Commissioners, which is responsible for the administration of various functions including infrastructure, public safety, and economic initiatives. The Board meets regularly to discuss issues affecting the community, providing a platform for residents to engage with their elected officials, voice concerns, and advocate for community-driven solutions. This commitment to community involvement fosters transparency and builds trust between constituents and local government.
Agriculture remains the cornerstone of Worth County’s economy, with cotton, peanuts, and poultry playing vital roles. As a result, local politics often focus on agricultural support, with initiatives aimed at promoting sustainable farming practices and providing resources for local farmers. The county works in conjunction with agricultural extension services and organizations to educate farmers about modern techniques, crop diversification, and the importance of maintaining viable agricultural practices for the future.
Education is a significant political concern in Worth County, governed by the Worth County School System. Local school board meetings see active participation from parents and community members, all advocating for improvements in educational funding, resources, and facilities. Recent efforts have targeted enhancing technology in the classroom and providing vocational training programs that align with local industry needs, thereby preparing students for the workforce and furthering their educational pursuits. There is a strong push for collaboration among educational institutions, local businesses, and government to ensure a sustainable and skilled workforce.
Public safety is another primary focus for local governance in Worth County. The Worth County Sheriff's Office works to maintain community safety through various initiatives such as neighborhood policing and community engagement programs. Public safety discussions often include improving resources for law enforcement and emergency services to adequately serve a rural population. The county emphasizes a community-oriented approach, encouraging residents to participate in public safety meetings and collaborate with law enforcement agencies.
Infrastructure development poses continuous challenges, especially concerning rural road maintenance and access to healthcare services. Worth County leaders strive to secure funding for essential infrastructure projects, including road repairs and improvements to water and sewer systems, to promote economic growth and enhance the quality of life for residents. Partnerships with state and federal agencies, coupled with grant opportunities, are pursued to address these infrastructural needs effectively.
Civic engagement in Worth County has seen an increase as residents express growing interest in local governance and political participation. Voter registration drives and educational workshops aim to inform citizens about the electoral process, ensuring that community voices are heard in local elections. Town hall meetings provide an opportunity for constituents to engage directly with their elected representatives, fostering a sense of accountability and community connection.
Despite its historical roots, Worth County faces contemporary challenges such as limited healthcare access and outmigration of younger residents seeking opportunities in urban centers. Local leaders are committed to addressing these issues through strategic planning and community collaboration, exploring partnerships with healthcare providers to broaden access to medical services and enhance community well-being.
United States
Georgia 
