Nuclear threats during the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Last updated

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, several senior Russian politicians, including president Vladimir Putin, former president and prime minister Dmitry Medvedev, and foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, have made a number of statements widely seen as threatening the use of nuclear weapons. The possibility of Russia using tactical nuclear weapons, and the risk of broader nuclear escalation, has been widely discussed by commentators and in the media. [1] Additionally, the Russian occupation of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has led to a crisis over the safety of the plant and the risk of a nuclear disaster.

Contents

Russian statements

Russian president Vladimir Putin announcing the invasion on 24 February 2022 Vladimir Putin (2022-02-24).jpg
Russian president Vladimir Putin announcing the invasion on 24 February 2022

Four days after the launch of the Russian invasion, on 28 February, President Putin ordered Russia's nuclear forces to go into a "special mode of combat duty", a state of high alert. [2] [3]

On 20 April 2022, Russia carried out its first test launch of the RS-28 Sarmat, a new long-range intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). Putin said the new missile could defeat any missile defences, and that it should cause countries threatening Russia to "think twice". [4] The United States Department of Defense confirmed that Russia had properly notified the U.S. about the launch in advance, pursuant to New START, and that the U.S. considered the launch to be a test routine and not a threat. [5]

On 24 April, in apparent response to US secretary of state Antony Blinken's meeting with Zelenskyy in Kyiv on 23 April, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov stated that further support of Ukraine could cause tensions which could potentially lead to a World War III scenario involving Russia's full arsenal of weapons. [6] The day after Lavrov's comments, CNBC reported that US secretary Lloyd Austin referred to Russia's nuclear war rhetoric as being "dangerous and unhelpful". [7]

In apparent response to Germany deploying armed tanks to Ukraine, Putin announced in Russia's main legislative assembly that Russia would respond to any combative military provocation from outside of Ukraine with prompt peremptory action possible only with Russia's unique arsenal of nuclear weapons. [8] Pentagon Press secretary John Kirby called Putin's assertion of nuclear potency contrary to the process of the peaceful resolution of the current conflict in Ukraine. [9]

On 29 May, after repudiating accusations made against Russia regarding atrocities in Bucha, the Russian ambassador to the UK, Andrei Kelin, said in an interview with the BBC that he did not believe Russia would use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine until Russian sovereignty was found to be in peril. [3]

On 21 September, while announcing a partial mobilization of conscripts, Putin said that Russia "will use all the means at our disposal" – widely interpreted as a threat to use nuclear weapons – in order to defend the country’s territory. [10] He warned that his threat was "not a bluff", baselessly accused NATO of "nuclear blackmail" and of threatening to use nuclear weapons against Russia, and said Russia's nuclear weapons were more advanced than NATO's. [11] [12] Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov did not rule out the use of nuclear weapons to defend annexed Ukrainian territories. [13] Several days later, former Russian president and Putin ally Dmitry Medvedev made a more explicit threat of a nuclear strike against Ukraine. [14]

On 1 October, Ramzan Kadyrov, head of the Chechen Republic, called on Russia to use low-yield nuclear weapons in Ukraine in response to Russia losing the strategically important Ukrainian town of Lyman, [15] the first prominent Russian official to directly call for the use of nuclear weapons. [16] In response to Kadyrov's comments, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov said that the use of nuclear weapons would be determined by Russian military doctrine and not by emotions. [17]

Later in October, Russian officials, including Russian defense minister Sergei Shoigu, [18] began accusing Ukraine of preparing to use a radioactive dirty bomb on Ukrainian territory, prompting concerns in the West that Russia itself might be planning to use a dirty bomb and blame it on Ukraine. The allegations were additionally communicated in phone calls to Western officials by two top Russian officials. [19] On 24 October, John Kirby stated that there was no evidence Russia was preparing a dirty bomb strike. [20] A tweet by the Russian Ministry of Defence, purportedly showing evidence of a Ukrainian dirty bomb in production, was debunked as a collection of old and unrelated photos. [21] At Ukraine's request, the United Nations sent an IAEA investigation to Ukraine, which found no evidence of a dirty bomb being developed or any other undeclared nuclear activity. [22] [23] [24]

On 22 January 2023, Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the Duma, wrote on Telegram that "If Washington and NATO countries supply weapons that will be used to strike civilian cities and attempt to seize our territories, as they threaten, this will lead to retaliatory measures using more powerful weapons," and "Arguments that the nuclear powers have not previously used weapons of mass destruction in local conflicts are untenable. Because these states did not face a situation where there was a threat to the security of their citizens and the territorial integrity of the country." [25] In the same month, Russia repeatedly accused Ukraine of storing its military equipment in the nuclear power plants under its control. The IAEA has permanent observers in all Ukrainian plants since 2022, and on 24 January 2023, the agency issued a statement that it had found no military equipment in the plants. [26]

On 21 February 2023, during a Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly, Putin announced that Russia would be suspending its participation in New START, the last remaining nuclear weapons treaty between Russia and the United States. He stated, "[Russia] is not withdrawing from the treaty but is suspending its participation." [27] [28] On 26 February 2023, to state-owned television channel Russia-1, Putin said that Russia had no choice but to "take into account" the nuclear capabilities of NATO, and that the West wanted to "liquidate" Russia. [29] Russia said it would continue informing the US on planned launches of intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the 1988 Ballistic Missile Launch Notification Agreement. [30]

On 25 March 2023, Putin announced plans to install Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. [31] On 29 March, Russia's Defense Ministry announced that it would conduct a nuclear missile drill, which includes the testing of nuclear-tipped RS-24 Yars missiles. [32]

In March 2023, Russian journalist Dmitry Muratov, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021, warned that Russian state propaganda "is preparing people to think that nuclear war is not a bad thing. On TV channels here, nuclear war and nuclear weapons are promoted as if they're advertising pet food." [33]

In June 2023, Russian political scientist Sergey Karaganov called for the use of nuclear weapons by Russia against NATO member states in Europe, saying that "we will have to hit a bunch of targets in a number of countries in order to bring those who have lost their mind to reason." [34]

International reactions

On 14 April, The New York Times reported comments by CIA director William Burns, who said "potential desperation" could lead President Putin to order the use of tactical nuclear weapons. [35]

On 4 May, the US Senate held the "Hearing on Nuclear Readiness Amid Russia-Ukraine War" where Admiral Charles A. Richard stated that current nuclear triad defence capabilities in the US were operating at a minimal acceptable level of operational capacity, with Russian stockpiles and Chinese stockpiles currently larger than those of the US. [36] [ time needed ] On 6 May, Russian foreign ministry spokesman Alexei Zaitsev stated that Russia would not use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, describing their use as "not applicable to the Russian 'special military operation'". [37]

On 23 May, Russian diplomat Boris Bondarev resigned from his position and issued a critique of the invasion, singling out Lavrov's position on the potential use of Russian nuclear arms: "In 18 years, he (Lavrov) went from a professional and educated intellectual ... to a person who constantly broadcasts conflicting statements and threatens the world with nuclear weapons!" [38] Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishida stated that Japan would support further international discussion about Russia and its nuclear arms threats during the invasion of Ukraine at the upcoming nuclear non-proliferation meeting taking place next August. [39] [40] On 20 June, the "Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons" opened in Vienna to discuss potential catastrophic effects of nuclear arms, amid rising fears over Russia's possible use of nuclear weapons during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. [41]

On 1 July, during a visit by Lavrov to Belarus, Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko indicated support for Moscow to use nuclear weapons against the broad threats of Western hegemony over Russia and its allies demonstrated during the conflict in Ukraine. [42]

On 13 August, in an interview with the BBC, Jim Hockenhull, the outgoing head of UK Military Intelligence, said he considered the possibility of Russia imminently using nuclear weapons to be "unlikely". [43]

In a September 2022 interview, U.S. President Joe Biden was asked what consequences would ensue for Russian use of nuclear weapons. Biden responded: "You think I would tell you if I knew exactly what it would be? Of course, I'm not gonna tell you. It'll be consequential... They'll become more of a pariah in the world than they ever have been. And depending on the extent of what they do will determine what response would occur." [44] On 26 September, national security advisor Jake Sullivan spoke of "catastrophic consequences" if Russia used nuclear weapons, adding that "in private channels we have spelled out in greater detail (to Russia) exactly what that would mean". Secretary of State Antony Blinken similarly referred to a "catastrophic" U.S. response. [45]

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg stated on 21 September that NATO would "not engage in that same kind of reckless and dangerous nuclear rhetoric as President Putin". [46] On 4 October, British foreign minister James Cleverly said any Russian use of nuclear weapons would lead to consequences. [47] Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland Zbigniew Rau has stated a NATO response should be "devastating", but non-nuclear. Rau also stated on 5 October that he has asked for the U.S. to base nuclear weapons on Polish territory; this may have been partly in response to Russia's recent nuclear threat, and partly in response to the prospect of Russia basing nuclear weapons in Belarus. [48]

In September 2022, a Ukrainian sea drone attack on the Crimean Sevastopol Naval Base failed when the satellite Internet service Starlink, used for Ukrainian communications, didn't work in the target area. [49] [50] Elon Musk, CEO of Starlink, had denied Ukraine's request to turn on Starlink coverage up to Crimea. [49] [50] He had been warned by Russian ambassador to the US Anatoly Antonov that an attack on Crimea would be met with a nuclear response from Russia [51] and feared that an attack on Crimea could escalate the conflict to WW3. [52] Anne Applebaum wrote in The Atlantic that Musk's influence had been played by Russian disinformation. [53]

On 6 October 2022, during a speech at a private fundraiser in New York City, Biden said that for the "[f]irst time since the Cuban Missile Crisis, we have a direct threat of the use of the nuclear weapon if, in fact, things continue down the path they've been going... Think about it: We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis. We've got a guy I know fairly well; his name is Vladimir Putin. I spent a fair amount of time with him. He is not joking when he talks about the potential use of tactical and nuclear weapons, or biological or chemical weapons, because his military is, you might say, significantly underperforming... I don't think there’s any such thing as an ability to easily [use] a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon." [54] [55] [56] According to the Associated Press, Biden sometimes speaks in an unguarded way, using only rough notes, at such private fundraisers; [57] White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre later said that Biden's comments were not based on new intelligence or information. [58] In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper that aired on 11 October 2022, Biden said that he did not believe Putin would ultimately resort to deploying nuclear weapons in Ukraine, but criticized Putin's statements on the topic as "irresponsible". [59]

In an interview with the BBC on 11 October 2022, GCHQ Director Jeremy Fleming said the agency had seen no indications that Russia was preparing for the use of a tactical nuclear weapon. [60] Later, in a statement released on 18 October, Major General Kyrylo Budanov, Chief of the Main Directorate of Intelligence of Ukraine's Ministry of Defense, said he did not believe Russia would use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. [61]

On 24 January 2023, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists adjusted its Doomsday Clock to 90 seconds to midnight, a 10-second advancement from the Clock's previous time setting in 2020. The organization cited increasing risk of nuclear escalation stemming from Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a major factor in the adjustment. [62]

During a press briefing at the White House on 25 January 2023, John Kirby, Coordinator for Strategic Communications for the United States National Security Council, said that the United States does not "have any indication that Mr. Putin has any intention to use weapons of mass destruction - let alone nuclear weapons, tactical or otherwise." Kirby also said the United States has seen "absolutely no indications that Mr. Putin has designs on striking NATO territory." [63]

Analysis

Large nuclear weapons stockpile with global range (dark blue) World nuclear weapons.png
Large nuclear weapons stockpile with global range (dark blue)

In April 2022, American political activist Daniel Ellsberg compared Vladimir Putin's nuclear threats to Richard Nixon’s self-proclaimed "madman strategy". [64]

Eric Schlosser, writing for The Atlantic magazine on 22 June 2022, stated that the nuclear saber-rattling by Russia during the invasion appeared to suggest the most probable targets of a nuclear attack to be: "(1) a detonation over the Black Sea, causing no casualties but demonstrating a resolve to cross the nuclear threshold and signaling that worse may come, (2) a decapitation strike against the Ukrainian leadership, attempting to kill President Volodymyr Zelensky and his advisers in their underground bunkers, (3) a nuclear assault on a Ukrainian military target, perhaps an air base or a supply depot, that is not intended to harm civilians, and (4) the destruction of a Ukrainian city, causing mass civilian casualties and creating terror to precipitate a swift surrender — the same aims that motivated the nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki." [65] CSIS military expert Mark Cancian suggested the possibility of detonating high in the atmosphere to produce an electromagnetic pulse and knock out electronic equipment. [66]

On 7 September, The Washington Post reported that the Russian high military command had published an analysis saying that tactical nuclear arms remained a viable option for use against Ukraine, quoting Ukrainian commander in chief Valeriy Zaluzhnyi as stating: "There is a direct threat of the use, under certain circumstances, of tactical nuclear weapons by the Russian Armed Forces... It is also impossible to completely rule out the possibility of the direct involvement of the world’s leading countries in a ‘limited’ nuclear conflict, in which the prospect of World War III is already directly visible." [67]

Hans M. Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, said that "if you start detonating nuclear weapons in the area you potentially get radioactive fallout that you can't control — it could rain over your own troops as well, so it might not be an advantage to do that in the field." He also said that "the big problem is with people both inside the Russian system, but also in the public in general, if they think about tactical nuclear weapons as something small; something less severe or something almost okay." [68] On 1 October 2022, the Institute for the Study of War argued that Russian soldiers are "almost certainly incapable of operating on a nuclear battlefield", owing to their disorganization, and that this inability to advance through a nuclear environment reduces the likelihood of Russian tactical nuclear weapons use in the first place. [69] [70]

In a 2 October 2022 analysis, The Jerusalem Post stated "Most experts do not think that Russian President Vladimir Putin will actually use nuclear weapons in Ukraine at the end of the day, but the number of those who think he will or might is growing." Different analysts hypothesized different initial Western responses, depending in part on the nature of the initial Russian nuclear attack on Ukraine. Hypothetical initial responses included: increased sanctions, a conventional assault on Russian forces in Ukraine, a nuclear attack on Russian forces in Ukraine, or a nuclear attack on Belarus. Their analysis added that, even if Russia used a nuclear weapon, "the likelihood is still no" that it would lead to a full nuclear war. [71] Mark Cancian has suggested increased weapons shipments, including previously-restricted weapons like NATO aircraft, advanced anti-missile batteries, and ATACMS long-range missiles. [66]

In January 2023, Graham Allison, writing for Time , presented a seven-point summary of Putin's hypothetical intention to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Allison stated that: (1) There is a "rational" basis for Putin to apply limited nuclear weapons based on the older historical precedent set by Truman in WWII against Japan; (2) Putin has evaluated the risks of American retaliation for the use of tactical nuclear weapons and America's response that it would cause "catastrophic consequences" for Russia, the same as it would have during the height of the Cold War; (3) The potential loss of face for Putin before the Russian people in the case that Zelenskyy is successful in repelling further Russian occupational gains might provide an incentive for Putin to expand his theater of warfare to include tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine; (4) Putin does consider it politically justified to apply first-use of tactical nuclear weapons based on the standing Russian military doctrine called "escalate to de-escalate", in order to make adversarial forces stand-down; (5) Putin is aware of Biden's assertion that U.S. forces "will not fight World War III for Ukraine", even though Biden is aware of America's previous commitments to the military strategy of mutually assured destruction; (6) Reagan's doctrine that a "nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought" is part of America's political legacy as well, which appears relevant to Biden's perspective of which Putin is aware; and (7) Putin is also aware of the Cold War doctrine developed in previous generations that Soviet adversaries would be met with "determined effort" by U.S. military forces in case of Soviet military belligerence while conducting military operations. [72]

Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant crisis

These paragraphs are an excerpt from Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant crisis.[ edit ]

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant  has become the center of an ongoing nuclear safety crisis, described by Ukraine as an act of nuclear terrorism by Russia. [73]

The plant, which is the largest of its kind in Europe, has seen destruction of its infrastructure via shelling, damage to its power lines, amounting to what Ukrainian authorities call the largest situation of its kind in history. A potential disaster may exceed the scale of previous disasters at nuclear power plants. [74] [75]

According to a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), "The situation in Ukraine is unprecedented. It is the first time a military conflict has occurred amid the facilities of a large, established nuclear power" program. [76] Nuclear safety expert Attila Aszódi said that an event similar in type and scale to the Chernobyl disaster is technically and physically not possible in the Zaporizhzhia plant, while calling for urgent steps to ensure the safety of the plant. [77]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons</span> International treaty to prevent spread of nuclear weapons

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. Between 1965 and 1968, the treaty was negotiated by the Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament, a United Nations-sponsored organization based in Geneva, Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear warfare</span> Military conflict that deploys nuclear weaponry

Nuclear warfare, also known as atomic warfare, is a military conflict or prepared political strategy that deploys nuclear weaponry. Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction; in contrast to conventional warfare, nuclear warfare can produce destruction in a much shorter time and can have a long-lasting radiological result. A major nuclear exchange would likely have long-term effects, primarily from the fallout released, and could also lead to secondary effects, such as "nuclear winter", nuclear famine, and societal collapse. A global thermonuclear war with Cold War-era stockpiles, or even with the current smaller stockpiles, may lead to various scenarios including the extinction of the human species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World War III</span> Hypothetical future global conflict

World War III or the Third World War are names given to a hypothetical worldwide large-scale military conflict subsequent to World War I and World War II. The term has been in use since at least as early as 1941. Some apply it loosely to limited or more minor conflicts such as the Cold War or the war on terror. In contrast, others assume that such a conflict would surpass prior world wars in both scope and destructive impact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sergey Lavrov</span> Russian diplomat (born 1950)

Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov is a Russian diplomat who has served as the foreign minister of Russia since 2004. He is the longest-serving foreign minister since the Tsarist era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia and weapons of mass destruction</span>

The Russian Federation is known to possess or have possessed three types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear weapons, biological weapons, and chemical weapons. It is one of the five nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Power projection</span> Capacity of a state to deploy and sustain military forces outside its territory

Power projection in international relations is the capacity of a state to deploy and sustain forces outside its territory. The ability of a state to project its power into an area may serve as an effective diplomatic lever, influencing the decision-making processes and acting as a potential deterrent on other states' behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tactical nuclear weapon</span> Nuclear weapon designed for use on a battlefield

A tactical nuclear weapon (TNW) or non-strategic nuclear weapon (NSNW) is a nuclear weapon that is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations, mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. Generally smaller in explosive power, they are defined in contrast to strategic nuclear weapons, which are designed mostly to be targeted at the enemy interior far away from the war front against military bases, cities, towns, arms industries, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war. As of 2023, tactical nuclear weapons have never been used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Russia and the United States maintain one of the most important, critical and strategic foreign relations in the world. Both nations have shared interests in nuclear safety and security, nonproliferation, counterterrorism, and space exploration. Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became very tense after the United States imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed the United States on a list of "unfriendly countries", along with Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, European Union members, NATO members, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, Micronesia and Ukraine.

The foreign policy of Vladimir Putin concerns the policies of the Russian Federation's president Vladimir Putin with respect to other nations. He has held the office of the President previously from 2000 to 2008, and reassumed power again in 2012 and has been President since.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NATO–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the NATO military alliance and the Russian Federation were established in 1991 within the framework of the North Atlantic Cooperation Council. In 1994, Russia joined the Partnership for Peace program, and on 27 May 1997, the NATO–Russia Founding Act (NRFA) was signed at the 1997 Paris NATO Summit in France, enabling the creation of the NATO–Russia Permanent Joint Council (NRPJC). Through the early part of 2010s NATO and Russia signed several additional agreements on cooperation. The NRPJC was replaced in 2002 by the NATO–Russia Council (NRC), which was established in an effort to partner on security issues and joint projects together. Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became very tense after the NATO military alliance imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed all member states of NATO on a list of "unfriendly countries" along with Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Micronesia and Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Budapest Memorandum</span> 1994 OSCE conference agreements

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises three substantially identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary, on 5 December 1994, to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The three memoranda were originally signed by three nuclear powers: the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kh-47M2 Kinzhal</span> Russian nuclear-capable air-launched ballistic missile

The Kh-47M2 Kinzhal is a Russian hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile. It has a reported range of 1,500–2,000 km (930–1,240 mi) and speed up to Mach 10. It can carry either conventional or nuclear warheads and can be launched by Tu-22M3 bombers or MiG-31K interceptors. It has been deployed at airbases in Russia's Southern Military District and Western Military District.

Many states, international organizations, and civil society actors worldwide had expressed their reactions to the then-escalating crisis between Russia and Ukraine that started in March 2021. The crisis eventually culminated in a Russian invasion of Ukraine, beginning on 24 February 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine</span>

As part of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian state and state-controlled media have spread disinformation in an information war. Russian propaganda and fake news stories have attacked Ukraine's right to exist and accused it of being a neo-Nazi state, committing genocide against Russian speakers, developing nuclear and biological weapons, and being influenced by Satanism. Russian propaganda also accuses NATO of controlling Ukraine and building up military infrastructure in Ukraine to threaten Russia. Some of this disinformation has been spread by Russian web brigades. It has been widely rejected as untrue and crafted to justify the invasion and even to justify genocidal acts against Ukrainians. The Russian state has denied carrying out war crimes in Ukraine, and Russian media has falsely blamed some of them on Ukrainian forces instead. Some of the disinformation seeks to undermine international support for Ukraine and to provoke hostility against Ukrainian refugees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian invasion of Ukraine</span> Ongoing military conflict in Eastern Europe

On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in an escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that started in 2014. The invasion was the biggest attack on a European country since World War II. It is estimated to have caused tens of thousands of Ukrainian civilian casualties and hundreds of thousands of military casualties. By June 2022, Russian troops occupied about 20% of Ukrainian territory. About 8 million Ukrainians had been internally displaced and more than 8.2 million had fled the country by April 2023, creating Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II. Extensive environmental damage caused by the war, widely described as an ecocide, contributed to food crises worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">On conducting a special military operation</span> 2022 speech by Russian president Vladimir Putin

"On conducting a special military operation" was a televised broadcast by Russian president Vladimir Putin on 24 February 2022, announcing the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

There have been several rounds of peace talks to halt Russia's 2022 invasion in Ukraine and end the Russo-Ukrainian War in an armistice. The first meeting was held four days after the start of the invasion, on 28 February 2022, in Belarus. It concluded without result, with delegations from both sides returning to their capitals for consultations. A second and third round of talks took place on 3 and 7 March 2022, on the Belarus–Ukraine border, in an undisclosed location in the Gomel region of Belarus. A fourth and fifth round of talks were respectively held on 10 and 14 March in Antalya, Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant crisis</span> Ongoing nuclear safety crisis during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has become the center of an ongoing nuclear safety crisis, described by Ukraine as an act of nuclear terrorism by Russia.

This timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine covers the period from 29 August 2022, when Ukraine's Kherson counteroffensive started, to 11 November 2022 when Ukrainian troops retook Kherson. In between, Ukraine launched a successful counteroffensive in Kharkiv Oblast. Starting in October, Russia began a campaign of massive strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure.

The term red lines has seen use in the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and is a veiled threat of engagement that is intended to warn an opponent or observer not to interfere or undertake in an action or behaviour that would "cross the red line."

References

  1. ↑ Gressel, Gustav (7 July 2022). "Shadow of the bomb: Russia's nuclear threats – European Council on Foreign Relations". ECFR . Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  2. ↑ Roth, Andrews; Walker, Shaun; Rankin, Jennifer; Borger, Julian (28 February 2022). "Putin signals escalation as he puts Russia's nuclear force on high alert". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  3. 1 2 "Russia won't use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, says ambassador to UK". BBC News. 29 May 2022. Archived from the original on 29 May 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
  4. ↑ "Russia to deploy new intercontinental nuclear missiles by autumn". Al Jazeera. 23 April 2022. Archived from the original on 25 April 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  5. ↑ "Pentagon says Russia notified U.S. ahead of 'routine' ICBM test-launch". Reuters. 20 April 2022. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  6. ↑ "Russia's Lavrov Warns of 'Real' Danger of World War III". Moscow Times . 25 April 2022. Archived from the original on 26 April 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  7. ↑ Ellyatt, Holly; Turak, Natasha; Macias, Amanda (26 April 2022). "Pentagon chief calls Russia nuclear rhetoric 'dangerous'; U.S. to send diplomats back to Ukraine". CNBC. Archived from the original on 27 April 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  8. ↑ Wolfgang, Ben (27 April 2022). "Angry Putin wields energy, nuclear threats against West". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  9. ↑ "Pentagon press secretary John Kirby holds a news briefing". PBS News Hour . 27 April 2022. Archived from the original on 3 May 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  10. ↑ Ishaan Tharoor (21 September 2022). "Russia pushes the panic button and raises risk of nuclear war". The Washington Post . Washington, D.C. ISSN   0190-8286. OCLC   1330888409. Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 21 September 2022.
  11. ↑ Schofield, Kevin (21 September 2022). "'I'm Not Bluffing': Vladimir Putin Warns The West He Is Willing To Use Nuclear Weapons". HuffPost UK. Archived from the original on 30 September 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  12. ↑ Faulconbridge, Guy; Osborn, Andrew (28 September 2022). "Analysis: Truth or bluff? Why Putin's nuclear warnings have the West worried". Reuters. Archived from the original on 29 September 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  13. ↑ "Lavrov, at the UN, pledges 'full protection' for any territory annexed by Russia". Reuters. 24 September 2022. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022.
  14. ↑ Faulconbridge, Guy; Davis, Caleb (27 September 2022). "Medvedev raises spectre of Russian nuclear strike on Ukraine". Reuters. Archived from the original on 29 September 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2022.
  15. ↑ "Chechen's Kadyrov: Russia should use low-yield nuclear weapon in Ukraine". Al Arabiya English. Reuters. 1 October 2022. Archived from the original on 1 October 2022. Retrieved 1 October 2022.
  16. ↑ Sanger, David E.; Troianovski, Anton; Barnes, Julian E. (1 October 2022). "In Washington, Putin's Nuclear Threats Stir Growing Alarm". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  17. ↑ "Peskov, in response to Kadyrov's words about nuclear weapons, pointed out that emotions should not prevail". TASS. Archived from the original on 3 October 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
  18. ↑ "Russia claims Ukraine 'dirty bomb' in final stages". France 24. 24 October 2022.
  19. ↑ Ioanes, Ellen (30 October 2022). "What to expect after Russia's latest escalatory nuclear rhetoric". Vox. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  20. ↑ "US says Russia's 'dirty bomb' claims are pretext for escalation in Ukraine". ABC News. 24 October 2022. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  21. ↑ Norton, Tom (27 October 2022). "Fact Check: Russia's claim that photo shows 'dirty bomb' in Ukraine". Newsweek. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  22. ↑ "Inspectors To Look For Evidence Of Dirty Bomb Production In Ukraine This Week, IAEA Says". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 27 October 2022. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
  23. ↑ "'No sign' of Ukrainian 'dirty bomb', says UN nuclear watchdog". euronews. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  24. ↑ "IAEA Inspectors Complete In-Field Verification Activities at Three Ukraine locations, No Indications of Undeclared Nuclear Activities and Materials". www.iaea.org. 3 November 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  25. ↑ "Putin ally says West's deliveries of new weapons to Kyiv will lead to global catastrophe". Reuters. 22 January 2023. Retrieved 22 January 2023.
  26. ↑ "UPDATE 1-No military equipment found in Ukrainian nuclear plants - IAEA". Reuters. 24 January 2023. Retrieved 25 January 2023.
  27. ↑ "Putin Says Moscow Suspending Participation In New START Nuclear Treaty". Agence France Presse. 21 February 2023. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  28. ↑ "Putin defends Ukraine invasion, warns West in address". NHK WORLD. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
  29. ↑ "'One goal: to disband the former Soviet Union': Putin says Russia cannot ignore NATO's nuclear capability". ABC News. 26 February 2023. Retrieved 26 February 2023.
  30. ↑ Roth, Andrew; Borger, Julian (21 February 2023). "Putin says Russia will halt participation in New Start nuclear arms treaty". The Guardian . Retrieved 9 April 2023.
  31. ↑ Kostenko, Heather; Chen, Hira; Humayun, Mariya; Knight, Andrew; Carey, Radina; Gigova, Maria (26 March 2023). "Russia plans to station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, Putin says". CNN. Retrieved 31 March 2023.
  32. ↑ Glenn, Mike (29 March 2023). "Russia stages nuke missile drill as fighting continues in Ukraine". The Washington Times. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
  33. ↑ "Dmitry Muratov: Nuclear warning from Russia's Nobel-winning journalist". BBC News. 30 March 2023.
  34. ↑ "A Difficult but Necessary Decision". Russia in Global Affairs. 13 June 2023.
  35. ↑ Sanger, David E.; Barnes, Julian E. (14 April 2022). "C.I.A. Director Airs Concern That Putin Might Turn to Nuclear Weapons" . The New York Times . Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022. Retrieved 28 May 2022.
  36. ↑ "Hearing on Nuclear Readiness Amid Russia-Ukraine War". C-SPAN. 4 May 2022. Archived from the original on 12 May 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
  37. ↑ "Russian will not use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, foreign ministry says". Reuters . 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
  38. ↑ Keaten, Jamey (23 May 2022). "'Never have I been so ashamed': Russian envoy criticizes war". Associated Press. Davos. Archived from the original on 5 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  39. ↑ "Japan vows bigger security role in region to tackle threats". By MARI YAMAGUCHI and SYAWALLUDIN ZAIN – Associated Press. 10 January 2022. Archived 2022-06-11 at the Wayback Machine
  40. ↑ "Japan PM Kishida eyes attending NPT review conference in August". KYODO NEWS. 10 June 2022. Archived 2022-06-11 at the Wayback Machine
  41. ↑ "Conference on catastrophic effects of nuclear arms to open in Vienna". 19 June 2022. NHK World News. Archived 2022-06-20 at the Wayback Machine
  42. ↑ "Nuke tensions heighten amid Ukraine war as Belarus says Russia must ready Nuke weapons". WION. 2 July 2022. Archived 2022-07-03 at the Wayback Machine
  43. ↑ Beale, Jonathan (13 August 2022). "Ukraine war: Predicting Russia's next step in Ukraine". BBC . Archived from the original on 19 August 2022. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
  44. ↑ "Ukraine war: Biden warns Putin not to use tactical nuclear weapons". BBC News. 17 September 2022. Archived from the original on 30 September 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
  45. ↑ "Russia faces 'catastrophic' consequences if it uses nuclear weapons, U.S. warns". NBC News. 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  46. ↑ Meredith, Sam (September 2022). "Putin's 'incredibly dangerous' nuclear threats raise the risk of an unprecedented disaster". CNBC. Archived from the original on 3 October 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
  47. ↑ "UK warns Russia of consequences for any nuclear weapon use". Reuters. 4 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  48. ↑ "Poland suggests hosting US nuclear weapons amid growing fears of Putin's threats". the Guardian. 5 October 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  49. 1 2 Darcy, Oliver (12 September 2023). "An explosive Elon Musk biography is just hitting shelves. But the book's acclaimed author is already walking back a major claim | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
  50. 1 2 Borger, Julian (7 September 2023). "Elon Musk ordered Starlink to be turned off during Ukraine offensive, book says". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  51. ↑ Applebaum, Anne (11 September 2023). "What Russia Got by Scaring Elon Musk". The Atlantic. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  52. ↑ Farrow, Ronan (21 August 2023). "Elon Musk's Shadow Rule". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X . Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  53. ↑ Applebaum, Anne (11 September 2023). "What Russia Got by Scaring Elon Musk". The Atlantic. Retrieved 12 September 2023.
  54. ↑ Collinson, Stephen (7 October 2022). "Biden's chilling 'Armageddon' warning sharpens the stakes with Putin". CNN. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  55. ↑ "Pentagon spokesperson tamps down concerns over nuclear 'armageddon'". the Guardian. 9 October 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  56. ↑ "Remarks by President Biden at Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Reception". whitehouse.gov. 6 October 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  57. ↑ "Biden: Russia's Ukraine invasion puts threat of nuclear 'Armageddon' at highest level since 1962". ABC7 Chicago. Associated Press. 7 October 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  58. ↑ Borger, Julian; Rankin, Jennifer (7 October 2022). "Biden's 'Armageddon' warning wasn't based on new intelligence, US says". The Guardian . Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  59. ↑ Liptak, Kevin (11 October 2022). "Biden says Putin 'totally miscalculated' by invading Ukraine but is a 'rational actor' | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  60. ↑ Sabbagh, Dan (11 October 2022). "No signs Russia is preparing to use nuclear weapon, says GCHQ boss". The Guardian . Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  61. ↑ "Ukrainian defense intel chief predicts victory by next summer: 'Russia's loss is inevitable'". CNN . 18 October 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  62. ↑ Marples, Megan; Rogers, Kristen; Ramirez, Rachel (24 January 2023). "The Doomsday Clock reveals how close we are to total annihilation". CNN. Retrieved 25 January 2023.
  63. ↑ "Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby". White House . 25 January 2023. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
  64. ↑ "Daniel Ellsberg on the Existential Threat of Global Conflict". The Nation. 22 April 2022.
  65. ↑ Schlosser, Eric (22 June 2022). "What if Russia uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine?". The Atlantic . Archived from the original on 14 July 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022.
  66. 1 2 "What could happen if Putin used nuclear weapons in Ukraine?". France 24. 24 September 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  67. ↑ Berger, Miriam (7 September 2022). "Ukraine military chief says 'limited' nuclear war cannot be ruled out". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 13 September 2022. Retrieved 20 September 2022.
  68. ↑ "Nuclear weapons expert says we should be 'extraordinarily concerned' about Putin nuking Ukraine". Business Insider. 30 September 2022. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  69. ↑ "Ukraine celebrates recapturing key town, Putin ally raises nuclear jitters". CNBC. 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2022.
  70. ↑ "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 1". Institute for the Study of War. 1 October 2022. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
  71. ↑ "Russia Ukraine War: Will Putin spark nuclear war by using tactical nuke?". The Jerusalem Post. 2 October 2022. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2022.
  72. ↑ Allison, Graham (5 January 2023). "Will Russia Go Nuclear? 7 Key Questions to Consider". Time. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  73. ↑ "'Russian nuclear terror': Ukraine atomic plant attacked again". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
  74. ↑ "Російські військові обстрілюють ЗАЕС, щоб знищити її інфраструктуру та відімкнути від енергосистеми України". Енергоатом. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  75. ↑ "Місія МАГАТЕ на Запорізьку АЕС має вирушати з Києва, але має бути згода України та Росії ‒ Ґутерріш". Радіо Свобода. 18 August 2022. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
  76. ↑ "U.N. nuclear watchdog calls for a 'security protection zone' around the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia power plant". NBC News. 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
  77. ↑ Diaz-Maurin, François (2 September 2022). "A nuclear safety expert's view on the crisis at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.