David Pearce (philosopher)

Last updated

David Pearce
David Pearce (transhumanist).jpg
Pearce in 2013
BornApril 1959 (age 65)
Alma mater Brasenose College, Oxford [1]
Organisation Humanity+
Known forThe Hedonistic Imperative (1995)
Movement Transhumanism, veganism
Website www.hedweb.com

David Pearce (born April 1959) [2] is a British transhumanist philosopher. [3] [4] [5] He is the co-founder of the World Transhumanist Association, currently rebranded and incorporated as Humanity+. [6] [7] Pearce approaches ethical issues from a lexical negative utilitarian perspective. [8]

Contents

Based in Brighton, England, Pearce maintains a series of websites devoted to transhumanist topics and what he calls the "hedonistic imperative", a moral obligation to work towards the abolition of suffering in all sentient life. [9] [10] His self-published internet manifesto, The Hedonistic Imperative (1995), outlines how pharmacology, genetic engineering, nanotechnology and neurosurgery could converge to eliminate all forms of unpleasant experience from human and non-human life, replacing suffering with "information-sensitive gradients of bliss". [11] [12] Pearce calls this the "abolitionist project". [13]

Early life and education

Pearce grew up in Burpham, Surrey. His parents, grandparents and three of his great-grandparents were all vegetarian and his father was a Quaker. From a young age, Pearce was concerned with death and aging, and later the problem of suffering. He became a secular scientific rationalist around the age of 10 or 11. [14]

Pearce received a scholarship to study Politics, Philosophy and Economics at the University of Oxford, but never finished his degree. [14]

Hedonistic transhumanism

In 1995, Pearce set up BLTC Research, a network of websites publishing texts about transhumanism and related topics in pharmacology and biopsychiatry. [15] He published The Hedonistic Imperative that year, arguing that "[o]ur post-human successors will rewrite the vertebrate genome, redesign the global ecosystem, and abolish suffering throughout the living world." [16]

Pearce's ideas inspired an abolitionist school of transhumanism, or "hedonistic transhumanism", based on his idea of "paradise engineering" and his argument that the abolition of suffering—which he calls the "abolitionist project"—is a moral imperative. [13] [17] [18] He defends a version of negative utilitarianism.

He outlines how drugs and technologies, including intracranial self-stimulation ("wireheading"), designer drugs and genetic engineering could end suffering for all sentient life. [13] Mental suffering will be a relic of the past, just as physical suffering during surgery was eliminated by anaesthesia. [9] The function of pain will be provided by some other signal, without the unpleasant experience. [13]

A vegan, Pearce argues that humans have a responsibility not only to avoid cruelty to animals within human society but also to redesign the global ecosystem so that animals do not suffer in the wild. [19] He has argued in favour of a "cross-species global analogue of the welfare state", [20] suggesting that humanity might eventually "reprogram predators" to limit predation, reducing the suffering of animals who are predated. [21] Fertility regulation could maintain herbivore populations at sustainable levels, "a more civilised and compassionate policy option than famine, predation, and disease". [22] The increasing number of vegans and vegetarians in the transhumanism movement has been attributed in part to Pearce's influence. [23]

Humanity+ and other roles

In 1998, Pearce co-founded the World Transhumanist Association, known from 2008 as Humanity+, with Nick Bostrom. [11] Pearce is a member of the board of advisors. [24]

Currently, Pearce is a fellow of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, [25] and sits on the futurist advisory board of the Lifeboat Foundation. [26] He is also the director of bioethics of Invincible Wellbeing [27] and is on the advisory boards of the Center on Long-Term Risk, [28] the Organisation for the Prevention of Intense Suffering [29] and since 2021 the Qualia Research Institute. [30]

Until 2013, Pearce was on the editorial advisory board of the controversial and non-peer-reviewed journal Medical Hypotheses . [31] He has been interviewed by Vanity Fair (Germany) and on BBC Radio 4's The Moral Maze , among others. [32] [33]

Pearce currently serves as an advisory board member for Herbivorize Predators, [34] an organization whose mission is to discover how to transform carnivorous animals into herbivorous ones in order to minimize suffering across all species. [35]

Books

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transhumanism</span> Philosophical movement

Transhumanism is a philosophical and intellectual movement that advocates the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available new and future technologies that can greatly enhance longevity, cognition, and well-being.

In ethical philosophy, utilitarianism is a family of normative ethical theories that prescribe actions that maximize happiness and well-being for the affected individuals. In other words, utilitarian ideas encourage actions that lead to the greatest good for the greatest number. Although different varieties of utilitarianism admit different characterizations, the basic idea behind all of them is, in some sense, to maximize utility, which is often defined in terms of well-being or related concepts. For instance, Jeremy Bentham, the founder of utilitarianism, described utility as the capacity of actions or objects to produce benefits, such as pleasure, happiness, and good, or to prevent harm, such as pain and unhappiness, to those affected.

This index of ethics articles puts articles relevant to well-known ethical debates and decisions in one place - including practical problems long known in philosophy, and the more abstract subjects in law, politics, and some professions and sciences. It lists also those core concepts essential to understanding ethics as applied in various religions, some movements derived from religions, and religions discussed as if they were a theory of ethics making no special claim to divine status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Hughes (sociologist)</span> American sociologist and bioethicist

James J. Hughes is an American sociologist, bioethicist and futurist. He is the Executive Director of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies and is the Associate Provost for institutional research, assessment, and planning at University of Massachusetts Boston. He is the author of Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future and is currently writing a book on secular Buddhism and moral bioenhancement tentatively titled Cyborg Buddha: Using Neurotechnology to Become Better People.

The Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET) is a technoprogressive think tank that seeks to "promote ideas about how technological progress can increase freedom, happiness, and human flourishing in democratic societies." It was incorporated in the United States in 2004, as a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, by philosopher Nick Bostrom and bioethicist James Hughes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Posthuman</span> Person or entity that exists in a state beyond being human

Posthuman or post-human is a concept originating in the fields of science fiction, futurology, contemporary art, and philosophy that means a person or entity that exists in a state beyond being human. The concept aims at addressing a variety of questions, including ethics and justice, language and trans-species communication, social systems, and the intellectual aspirations of interdisciplinarity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wild animal suffering</span> Suffering of wild animals due to natural processes

Wild animal suffering is suffering experienced by non-human animals living in the wild, outside of direct human control, due to natural processes such as disease, injury, parasitism, starvation, malnutrition, dehydration, weather conditions, natural disasters, killings by other animals, and psychological stress. Some estimates indicate that these individual animals make up the vast majority of animals in existence. An extensive amount of natural suffering has been described as an unavoidable consequence of Darwinian evolution, as well as the pervasiveness of reproductive strategies, which favor producing large numbers of offspring, with a low amount of parental care and of which only a small number survive to adulthood, the rest dying in painful ways, has led some to argue that suffering dominates happiness in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directed evolution (transhumanism)</span> Concept in transhumanist discourses

The term directed evolution is used within the transhumanist community to refer to the idea of applying the principles of directed evolution and experimental evolution to the control of human evolution. Law professor Maxwell Mehlman has said that "for transhumanists, directed evolution is likened to the Holy Grail".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transhumanist politics</span> Political ideologies based on Transhumanism

Transhumanist politics constitutes a group of political ideologies that generally express the belief in improving human individuals through science and technology. Specific topics include space migration, and cryogenic suspension. It is considered the opposing ideal to the concept of bioconservatism, as Transhumanist politics argue for the use of all technology to enhance human individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bioconservatism</span> Cautious stance towards modifying human nature

Bioconservatism is a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes caution and restraint in the use of biotechnologies, particularly those involving genetic manipulation and human enhancement. The term "bioconservatism" is a portmanteau of the words biology and conservatism.

The eradication or abolition of suffering is the concept of using biotechnology to create a permanent absence of involuntary pain and suffering in all sentient beings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predation problem</span> Consideration of predation as a moral problem

The predation problem or predation argument refers to the consideration of the harms experienced by animals due to predation as a moral problem, that humans may or may not have an obligation to work towards preventing. Discourse on this topic has, by and large, been held within the disciplines of animal and environmental ethics. The issue has particularly been discussed in relation to animal rights and wild animal suffering. Some critics have considered an obligation to prevent predation as untenable or absurd and have used the position as a reductio ad absurdum to reject the concept of animal rights altogether. Others have criticized any obligation implied by the animal rights position as environmentally harmful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Relationship between animal ethics and environmental ethics</span>

The relationship between animal ethics and environmental ethics concerns the differing ethical consideration of individual nonhuman animals—particularly those living in spaces outside of direct human control—and conceptual entities such as species, populations and ecosystems. The intersection of these two fields is a prominent component of vegan discourse.

Suffering-focused ethics are those views in ethics according to which reducing suffering is either a key priority or our only aim. Those suffering-focused ethics according to which the reduction of suffering is a key priority are pluralistic views that include additional aims, such as the prevention of other disvaluable things like inequality, or the promotion of certain valuable things, such as pleasure. Nevertheless, these views still prioritize reducing preventable suffering over these other aims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Risk of astronomical suffering</span> Risks of astronomical suffering

Risks of astronomical suffering, also called suffering risks or s-risks, are risks involving much more suffering than all that has occurred on Earth so far. They are sometimes categorized as a subclass of existential risks.

"The Meat Eaters" is a 2010 essay by the American philosopher Jeff McMahan, published as an op-ed in The New York Times. In the essay, McMahan asserts that humans have a moral obligation to stop eating meat and, in a conclusion considered to be controversial, that humans also have a duty to prevent predation by individuals who belong to carnivorous species, if we can do so without inflicting greater harm overall.

<i>Wild Animal Ethics</i> Book about wild animal suffering and ethics

Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering is a 2020 book by the philosopher Kyle Johannsen, that examines whether humans, from a deontological perspective, have a duty to reduce wild animal suffering. He concludes that such a duty exists and recommends effective interventions that could be potentially undertaken to help these sentient individuals.

Existential risk studies (ERS) is a field of studies focused on the definition and theorization of "existential risks", its ethical implications and the related strategies of long-term survival. Existential risks are diversely defined as global kinds of calamity that have the capacity of inducing the extinction of intelligent earthling life, such as humans, or, at least, a severe limitation of their potential, as defined by ERS theorists. The field development and expansion can be divided in waves according to its conceptual changes as well as its evolving relationship with related fields and theories, such as futures studies, disaster studies, AI safety, effective altruism and longtermism.

"Letter from Utopia" is a fictional letter written by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2008. It depicts, what Bostrom describes as, "A vision of the future, from the future". In the essay, a posthuman in the far future writes to humanity in the deep past, describing how wonderful their utopian existence is and encouraging their ancestors to do everything they can to make their future possible. This includes conquering aging, sickness, and death, increasing human intelligence, and eliminating suffering in pursuit of pleasure. The essay is considered a manifesto of transhumanism.

References

  1. "Notable Alumni - Brasenose College, Oxford". Brasenose College, Oxford. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  2. "David PEARCE". Companies House. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2021.
  3. Keulartz, Jozef (2016). "Should the Lion Eat Straw Like the Ox? Animal Ethics and the Predation Problem". Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 29 (5). SpringerLink: 813–834. Bibcode:2016JAEE...29..813K. doi: 10.1007/s10806-016-9637-4 . hdl: 2066/161423 . S2CID   5918938.
  4. Schneider, Susan. "Future Minds: Transhumanism, Cognitive Enhancement and the Nature of Persons". Penn Libraries. University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  5. Dobrodum, Olga; Kyvliuk, Olga (29 January 2021). "Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Reflection of the Human Civilization Future" (PDF). Philosophy and Cosmology. 26: 77–89. doi:10.29202/phil-cosm/26/6. S2CID   234292838 . Retrieved 29 September 2022.
  6. Bostrom, Nick (April 2005). "A history of transhumanist thought" (PDF). Journal of Evolution and Technology . 14 (1). 15–16.
  7. Brey, Philip; Søraker, Johnny Hartz (2009). "Philosophy of Computing and Information Technology", in Anthonie Meijers (ed.). Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Elsevier, 1389.
  8. "Negative Utilitarianism FAQ". www.utilitarianism.com. Retrieved 14 September 2019.
  9. 1 2 Power, Katherine (2006). "The End of Suffering". Philosophy Now.
  10. Hauskeller, Michael (January 2010). "Nietzsche, the Overhuman and the Posthuman: A Reply to Stefan Sorgner". Journal of Evolution and Technology. 21(1), 5–8.
  11. 1 2 Bostrom (2005), 15.
  12. Pearce, David (2012). "The Biointelligence Explosion", in Amnon H. Eden, et al. (eds.). Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 199–236.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Thweatt-Bates, Jeanine (2016). Cyborg Selves: A Theological Anthropology of the Posthuman. London: Routledge, 50–51 (first published 2012).
  14. 1 2 Sosis, Cliff (11 October 2022). "David Pearce". What Is It Like to Be a Philosopher?. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  15. DeMars, William Emile (2005). NGOs and Transnational Networks: Wild Cards in World Politics . Pluto Press. 171. ISBN   074531905X.
  16. Adams, Nathan A. IV (2004). "An Unnatural Assault on Natural Law" in Colson, Charles W. and Nigel M. de S. Cameron (eds.). Human Dignity in the Biotech Century: A Christian Vision for Public Policy. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 167. ISBN   0830827838
  17. Hughes, James J. (2007). "The Compatibility of Religious and Transhumanist Views of Metaphysics, Suffering, Virtue and Transcendence in an Enhanced Future" Archived 30 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine , Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 20.
  18. Bostrom (2005), 16.
  19. Thweatt-Bates (2016), 100–101.
  20. Pearce, David (16 September 2009). "The Genomic Bodhisattva". H+ Magazine (Interview). Interviewed by James Kent. Archived from the original on 4 March 2018. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
    Jewish Nobel Laureate Isaac Bashevis Singer described life for factory-farmed animals as 'an eternal Treblinka': a world of concentration camps extermination camps and industrialized mass-killing. Strip away our ingrained anthropocentric bias, and what we do to other sentient beings is barbaric. Combating great evil justifies heroic personal sacrifice; going vegan entails mild personal inconvenience. The non-human animals we factory-farm and kill are functionally akin to human babies and toddlers. Babies and toddlers need looking after, not liberating. As the master species we have a duty of care to lesser beings, just as we have a duty of care to vulnerable and handicapped humans. As our mastery of technology matures, I think we need to build a cross-species global analogue of the welfare state.
  21. Verchot, Manon (30 September 2014). "Meet the people who want to turn predators into herbivores". TreeHugger . Archived from the original on 4 March 2018. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
  22. Pearce, David (30 July 2014). "The Radical Plan to Phase Out Earth's Predatory Species" (Interview). Interviewed by George Dvorsky. io9. Archived from the original on 4 March 2018. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
    Carnivorous predators keep populations of herbivores in check. Plasmodium-carrying species of the Anopheles mosquito keep human populations in check. In each case, a valuable ecological role is achieved at the price of immense suffering and the loss of hundreds of millions of lives. What's in question isn't the value of the parasite or predator's ecological role, but whether intelligent moral agents can perform that role better. On some fairly modest assumptions, fertility regulation via family planning or cross-species immunocontraception is a more civilised and compassionate policy option than famine, predation and disease. The biggest obstacle to a future of compassionate ecosystems is the ideology of traditional conservation biology—and unreflective status quo bias.
  23. Fairlie, Simon (2010). Meat: A Benign Extravagance. Chelsea Green Publishing. 230–231. ISBN   978-1603583251.
  24. "Advisors" Archived 13 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine , Humanity+.
  25. "Fellows - IEET". Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies.
  26. Advisory boards, Lifeboat Foundation.
  27. "Team". Invincible Wellbeing. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 23 May 2021.
  28. "Team - Center on Long-Term Risk". Center on Long-Term Risk. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 11 July 2021.
  29. "Organisation for the Prevention of Intense Suffering (OPIS)". Archived from the original on 20 April 2017. Retrieved 23 May 2021.
  30. Zuckerman, Andrew (25 January 2021). "Qualia Research Institute: History & 2021 Strategy". Qualia Research Institute. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 23 May 2021.
  31. "Medical Hypotheses Editorial Advisory Board, 2013". Medical Hypotheses. Archived from the original on 26 June 2013.
  32. Niermann, Ingo (5 April 2007). "Mehr Rausch für alle". Vanity Fair.
  33. "The Pursuit of Happiness". The Moral Maze. BBC Radio 4. 7 August 2013. from 00:11:13.
  34. "Who We Are". Herbivorize Predators. Retrieved 5 March 2023.
  35. Smyth, Richard (12 April 2023). "Why we need to be honest with children about the brutality of nature". New Scientist . Retrieved 23 November 2023.