Old Church Slavonic grammar

Last updated

Old Church Slavonic is an inflectional language with moderately complex verbal and nominal systems.

Contents

Nouns

The nominal case category distinguishes 7 cases for nouns, 6 for pronouns and adjectives (no vocative):

Nominal cases
Abbr.Case
N Nominative
G Genitive
D Dative
A Accusative
V Vocative
L Locative
I Instrumental

Noun syntax

Number

Old Church Slavonic has three numbers: singular, dual, and plural.

The dual, and not the plural, is used for nouns that are two. Nouns found in natural pairs, such as eyes, ears, and hands, are only found rarely in the plural. Due to its consistent use in all Old Church Slavonic texts, it appears to have been a living element of the language. The dual affects adjectives and verbs in addition to nouns. [1]

Nominative case

The nominative is used for the subject of a sentence, but it is only distinguished from the accusative in the masculine plural and the feminine singular, excluding the i-declension. [1] Unlike in most modern Slavic languages, the nominative is also typically used for the complement of verbs meaning "to be". [2] It is also used with verbs of naming and calling, but the accusative is also used for these verbs. [2]

Accusative case

The accusative case is used for the direct object of a sentence with transitive verbs. For the masculine o/jo declension, the accusative singular for "an adult, healthy, free male person" is often shown by the use of the endings of the genitive singular. [3] The accusative is also used with nouns for a duration of time and a measure of distance. [4] Old Church Slavonic makes more frequent use of the accusative case after negated infinitives and participles than other Slavic languages, and it is unclear if this is an innovation of Old Church Slavonic or an archaism. [5]

Genitive case

When used with nouns, the genitive frequently denotes the possessor of another noun or "the whole of which the other noun is a part", among other meanings. [6] It is also used frequently with the numerals after five, and with certain pronouns, in the form of the partitive genitive. [7]

The genitive may be used as the complement of the 'verb to' to denote possession, and it replaces the nominative as the complement of 'to be' in impersonal sentences if the verb is negated. [8] It is also used for the object of negated infinitives or participles, and for the objects of certain verbs. [9] It is used after some adjectives, and for objects of comparison after adjectives in the comparative. [10] When recording a date, the month is typically written in the genitive. [10] Unlike other Slavic languages, there is no genitive of time. [10]

Dative case

The dative case is used for the indirect object of a sentence. In addition, it is infrequently used to denote the goal of a motion (its original meaning), but this is more typically shown by using the preposition къ () followed by the dative. It is also used for the objects of verbs of commanding, obeying, favoring, giving, saying, showing, and promising, as well as for verbs meaning "to seem", and "to be similar to". [11] Additionally, it can be used with nouns and adjectives, particularly in impersonal constructions. [12] It can also be used for a "dative of advantage", showing for whom an action was performed, and as an "ethic dative" that shows "emphasis or emotional involvement". [13] Moreover, the dative can also be used to show possession, typically showing a close relationship between the possessor and the thing possessed, in which form it can occur after the verb "to be" or adjoining the noun possessed. [14] The dative is also used for the "dative absolute" construction, a type of subordinate clause, in which a participle, often with a noun subject, are both placed in the dative. [15]

Instrumental case

The instrumental case can show the "instrument" by which an action was performed, mark "a part of the body or state of mind accompanying the action", and denote the manner in which something was performed. [16] The instrumental can be used to denote measure following a comparison, how many times an action was performed with numerals, an instrumental of place showing over or through what a movement occurs, to denote the time of an action, to mean "in respect to" when use with verbs, adjectives, or other nouns, and to denote the cause of verb, among other meanings. [17] It is also used to denote the agent in passive constructions. [18]

The instrumental is also found rarely for the complement of the verb "to be". It is not found in this meaning in the oldest Old Church Slavonic texts, the Gospels, and only occasionally in later texts. [19]

Locative case

The locative case is used to denote the location in which something occurs. It very rarely occurs without a preceding preposition. Without a preposition, it is only used with place names, as a "locative of place". Due to more frequent use of locatives of place in Old Russian and Old Czech, it is possible that this rarity is caused by Old Church Slavonic following Greek syntax. [20] It is also used, again rarely, for the "locative of time" to denote "in" a certain time. [21] The locative is also used as the object of a small number of verbs; as this construction is extremely rare in other Slavic languages it is most likely an archaic form. [21]

Vocative case

The vocative is used instead of the nominative when a noun is used in isolation as an address or exclamation. Due to this case's consistent use in translations from Greek, in which the vocative is often identical to the nominative, it is clear that it was productive part of the spoken language. [22]

o-stems

jo-stems

a-stems

ja-stems

i-stems

u-stems

ū-stems

n-stems

s-stems

t-stems

r-stems

Pronouns

Personal pronouns

Declension of the personal pronouns
Singular1st person2nd personReflexive
Nominativeазътꙑ
Genitiveменетебесебе
Dativeмьнѣ, митебѣ, тисебѣ, си
Accusativeмѧтѧсѧ
Locativeмьнѣтебѣсебѣ
Instrumentalмъноѭтобоѭсобоѭ
Dual1st person2nd personReflexive
Nominativeвѣва
Genitiveнаюваюсебе
Dativeнама, навама, васебѣ, си
Accusativeнавасѧ
Locativeнаюваюсебѣ
Instrumentalнамавамасобоѭ
Plural1st person2nd personReflexive
Nominativeмꙑвꙑ
Genitiveнасъвасъсебе
Dativeнамъ, нꙑвамъ, вꙑсебѣ, си
Accusativeнꙑвꙑсѧ
Locativeнасъвасъсебѣ
Instrumentalнамивамисобоѭ
Declension of the third personal pronoun
SingularMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeиѥ
Genitiveегоегоѥѩ
Dativeемоуемоуѥи
Accusativeи, ньѥѭ
Locativeѥмьѥмьѥи
Instrumentalимьимьѥѭ
DualMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeии
Genitiveѥюѥюѥю
Dativeимаимаима
Accusativeии
Locativeѥюѥюѥю
Instrumentalимаимаима
PluralMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeиѩ
Genitiveихъихъихъ
Dativeимъимъимъ
Accusativeѩѩ
Locativeихъихъихъ
Instrumentalимиимиими

Just as the first and second person pronouns, the third person pronoun is commonly used only in oblique cases. Nominative singular forms are not attested in the OCS corpus, and are reconstructed. In the East South Slavic dialectal area where OCS originated, a suppletive nominative singular stem of the demonstrative ('that') is used, elsewhere onъ ('that one there, yon'), or very rarely ('this').

By attaching the enclitic particle že to the forms of *i one obtains the relative pronoun: iže ('he who'), ježe ('the (female) one to whom'), jejuže ('the two of whom'), etc.

When following prepositions, these pronouns take a prothetic n-, hence kъ n'imъ ('to them') instead of *imъ, na n'emь ('on him'), etc. This is a remnant of final -m/n in the PIE prepositions *kom (cf. Latin cum, Sanskrit kám),


The reflexive pronoun has only singular oblique forms, which is the state of affairs inherited from PIE *swé. The reflexive pronoun refers to the subject as a whole, and can be translated as English -self (myself, yourself, himself etc.)

Relative pronoun

SingularMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeижеежеꙗже
Genitiveегожеегожееѩже
Dativeемоужеемоужееиже
Accusativeижеежеѭже
Locativeемьжеемьжееиже
Instrumentalимьжеимьжееѭже
DualMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeꙗжеижеиже
Genitiveеюжееюжееюже
Dativeимажеимажеимаже
Accusativeꙗжеижеиже
Locativeеюжееюжееюже
Instrumentalимажеимажеимаже
PluralMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominativeижеꙗжеѩже
Genitiveихъжеихъжеихъже
Dativeимъжеимъжеимъже
Accusativeѩжеꙗжеѩже
Locativeихъжеихъжеихъже
Instrumentalимижеимижеимиже

As mentioned, the third person pronoun *i participates in the formation of the relative pronoun by appending the indeclinable enclitic že. Unlike the third person pronoun, however, the nominative case forms do occur. Similarly, a prothetic n- occurs when following prepositions, e.g., vъ n'ьže ('in which').

Interrogative pronoun and adjective

Indefinite pronouns and adjectives

The interrogative pronouns kъto, čьto can also have the indefinite meanings of 'anybody', 'anything' respectively.

The prefix ně- imparts an indefinite meaning to the word to which it is attached: thus kъto ('who?') becomes někъto ('someone'), and čьto ('what?') becomes něčьto ('something'). Similarly, the prefix ni- imparts a negative meaning: nikъto ('no one'), ničьto ('nothing'). A prepositions may come between prefix and base word:

ně u kogowith someone
ni o komьže nerodišiyou care for no one

Adjectives

OCS adjectives can be in two forms: short and long, corresponding to indefinite and definite meaning respectively. The long and short forms of the adjective have distinct syntactical roles. In general the long form is used attributively, whereas the short form is predicative: чловѣкъ добръ 'a good man, man is good'; чловѣкъ добръіи 'the good man, the man who is good'. The short form is indefinite in meaning, 'man is good'. The combination of a short-form adjective with substantive is used when the signified entity is presented as new, without prior reference. Hence въ пєшть огн҄ьнѫ 'into a furnace, a fiery one'. The long form, by contrast, acts as a pointer and is definite, 'the good man'. The long-form adjective with substantive combination is used when the adjective presents a quality known to be associated with the substantive modified. Hence въ гєонѫ огн҄ьнѫѭ 'into hell the fiery'. The compound form is often rendered in English by a relative clause: 'into the hell which is fiery'. Adjectives used as substantives are themselves subject to the long and short form distinction. Again the long form refers to a substantive previously introduced or assumed known. Thus привѣшѧ къ н҄ємѹ слѣпа... и имъ слѣпаєго за рѫкѫ 'they brought to him a blind man... and having taken the blind man by the hand...'. In a sequence of coordinated participles, when used as substantives, it is typical for only the first to use the long form. The following substantives use the short form. Hence слъішѧи словєса моја и творѧ ја... 'he who hears my words and does them...'.

Indefinite adjectives are inflected as the corresponding nouns of the primary declension, e.g., novъ as rabъ, nova as žena, novo as selo, ništь as vračь, ništa as duša, nište as polje.

Definite adjectives (also known as compound, long, or pronominal forms of adjective) are formed by suffixing to the indefinite form the anaphoric third-person pronoun (spelled as i in OCS orthography), ja, je as shown in the table.

"new"
N novъ + i (jь) = novъjь > novyinova + ja = novaja
G nova + jego = novajegonovy + jeję = novyję
D novu + jemu = novujemunově + jei = nověi
A novъ + i (jь) = novъjь > novyinovǫ + jǫ = novǫjǫ
L nově + jemь = novějemьnově + jei = nověi
I novomь + imь = novъimь > novyimьnovojǫ + jejǫ = novojǫ, novǫjǫ
N, A nova + ja = novajanově + i = nověi
G, L novu + jeju = novujunovu + jeju = novuju
D, I novoma + ima = novyimanovoma + ima = novyima
N novi + (j)i = noviinovy + ję = novyję
G novъ + ixъ = novyixъnovъ + ixъ = novyixъ
D novomъ + imъ = novyimъnovamъ + imъ = novyimъ
A novy + ję = novyjęnovy + ję = novyję
L nověxъ + ixъ = novyixъnovaxъ + ixъ = novyixъ
I novy + imi = novyiminovami + imi = novyimi

Adjective gradation

There are three levels of adjective gradation in OCS:

Comparative

  1. Adjectives with falling tone on the root syllable:
    dragъ ("dear") − draž-ii (m), draž-e (n), draž-ьši (f);
    tęžьkъ ("heavy") − tęžii, tęže, tęžьši;
    grǫbъ ("grumpy") − grǫblii, grǫble, grǫblьši.
  2. Adjectives with rising tone on the root syllable:
    novъ ("new") − nov-ěi, nov-ěje, nov-ěiši;
    starъ ("old") − starěi, starěje, starěiši;
    junъ ("young") − juněi, juněje, juněiši.

Declension of the comparative

N dražiidražedražьšijuněijunějejuněiši
G dražьšadražьšadražьšęjuněišajuněišajuněišę
D dražьšudražьšudražьšijuněišujuněišujuněiši
A dražьšiidražedražьšǫjuněijunějejuněišǫ
L dražьšidražьšidražьšijuněišijunějišijuněiši
I dražьšemьdražьšemьdražьšejǫjuněišemьjuněišemьjuněišejǫ
N, A dražьšadražьšidražьšijuněišajuněišijuněiši
G, L dražьšudražьšudražьšujuněišujuněišujuněišu
D, I dražьšemadražьšemadražьšamajuněišemajuněišemajuněišama
N dražьšedražьšadražьšęjuněišejuněišajuněišę
G dražьšьdražьšьdražьšьjuněišьjuněišьjuněišь
D dražьšemъdražьšemъdražьšamъjuněišemъjuněišemъjuněišamъ
A dražьšędražьšadražьšęjuněišęjuněišajuněišę
L dražьšixьdražьšixьdražьšaxьjuněišixьjuněišixьjuněišaxь
I dražьšidražьšidražьšamijuněišijuněišijuněišami

Superlative

The superlative is formed:

  1. by adding the prefix nai- to the comparative base: naidražii, naitęžьši, naigrǫble;
  2. by combining the comparative form with the pronoun vьsego/vьsěxъ: nověi vьsego, dražii vьsěxъ.

The absolute superlative is formed:

  1. by adding the prefix prě- to the positive: prědragъ, prěnova, prěstaro;
  2. by using the adverb ʒělo with the positive: ʒělo dragъ, ʒělo nova, ʒělo staro.

Numerals

Cardinals

1jedinъ (m), jedina (f), jedino (n)
2dъva (m), dъvě (f and n)
3trьje (m), tri (f and n)
4četyre (m), četyri (f and n)
5pętь
6šestь
7sedmь
8osmь
9devętь
10desętь
11jedin-ъ/a/o na desęte
12dъv-a/ě na desęte
20dъva desęti
21dъva desęti i jedin-ъ/a/o
22dъva desęti i dъv-a/ě
30trije desęte
40četyre desęte
50pętь desętь
60šestь desętь
70sedmь desętь
80osmь desętь
90devętь desętь
100sъto
200dъvě sъtě
300tri sъta
400četyre sъta
500pętь sъtъ
1 000tysęšti, tysǫšti
2 000dъvě tysǫšti
5 000pętь tysǫštь
10 000desętь tysǫštьortьma
20 000dъvadesęti tysǫštьordъvě tьmě
100 000sъto tysǫštьorleĝeonъ

Declension of cardinal numbers

1pronominal declension jedinъ − jedinogo, jedina − jedinoję
2pronominal declension, only in dual
3undergoes i-stem declension, plural forms only
4exactly like trьje, tri, except for the nominative and genitive which undergo consonant-stem declension
5–10undergoes i-stem declension, only in singular, except for desętь which also has dual and plural forms
11–19only the first component is inflected, e.g. jedinomu na desęte
20, 30, 40both components are inflected, e.g. dъvěma desętьma, trьmь desętьmь
50–90only the first component is inflected, e.g. pętijǫ desętь
sъto is declined as selo, tysęšti as bogyni, tьma as žena, leĝeonъ as rabъ

Ordinals

1prъvyi, prъvaja, prъvoje
2vъtoryi, vъtoraja, vъtoroje
3tretii, tretijaja, tretijeje
4četvrъyi, četvrъaja, četvrъoje
5pętyi, pętaja, pętoje
11prъvyi / prъvaja / prъvoje na desęte
20dъvadesętьn-yi/aja/oje
21dъvadesętьn-yi/aja/oje prъv-yi/aja/oje
60šestьdesętьn-yi/aja/oje
100sъtъn-yi/aja/oje
1 000tysǫčьn-yi/aja/oje

All ordinals are inflected like the corresponding adjectives.

Verbs

Present

The present tense is formed by adding present-tense endings onto the present tense stem, which itself is sometimes hidden due to sound changes that have occurred in the past (more common verbs are listed):

There are several classes of verbs:

1. e-type verbs add the interfix -e- to the present stem (except in front of ) and the endings:

VerbSingularPluralDual
bosti (bod-) ("stab")
  • 1. bod -ǫ
  • 2. bod -e + -ši
  • 3. bod -e + -
  • 1. bod -e + -
  • 2. bod -e + -te
  • 3. bod -ǫtъ
  • 1. bod -e + -
  • 2. bod -e + -ta
  • 3. bod -e + -te
rešti (rek-) ("speak")
  • 1. rek -ǫ
  • 2. reč -e + -ši
  • 3. reč -e + -
  • 1. reč -e + -
  • 2. reč -e + -te
  • 3. rek -ǫtъ
  • 1. reč -e + -
  • 2. reč -e + -ta
  • 3. reč -e + -te

2. i-type verbs exhibit the same set of endings, but this time the interfix is -i- (except in front of and ). In the first person singular one finds the processes of iotation (k/c + j > č, g/z + j > ž, x/s + j > š, l + j > lj, n + j > nj, t + j > št, d + j > žd) and epenthesis (bj > blj, pj > plj, mj > mlj, vj > vlj):

VerbSingularPluralDual
xvaliti (xval-) ("praise")
  • 1. xval + -j + -ǫ
  • 2. xval -i + -ši
  • 3. xval -i + -
  • 1. xval -i + -
  • 2. xval -i + -te
  • 3. xval -ętъ
  • 1. xval -i + -
  • 2. xval -i + -ta
  • 3. xval -i + -te
ljubiti (ljub-) ("love")
  • 1. ljub + -lj + -ǫ
  • 2. ljub -i + -ši
  • 3. ljub -i + -
  • 1. ljub -i + -
  • 2. ljub -i + -te
  • 3. ljub -ętъ
  • 1. ljub -i + -
  • 2. ljub -i + -ta
  • 3. ljub -i + -te

3. The athematic verbs byti, dati, věděti, iměti and jasti form the present tense irregularly:

VerbSingularPluralDual
byti ("be")
  • 1. jesmь
  • 2. jesi
  • 3. jestъ
  • 1. jesmъ
  • 2. jeste
  • 3. sǫtъ
  • 1. jesvě
  • 2. jesta
  • 3. jeste
věděti ("know")
  • 1. věmь
  • 2. věsi
  • 3. věstъ
  • 1. věmъ
  • 2. věste
  • 3. vědętъ
  • 1. věvě
  • 2. věsta
  • 3. věste
iměti ("have")
  • 1. imamь
  • 2. imaši
  • 3. imatъ
  • 1. imamъ
  • 2. imate
  • 3. imǫtъ
  • 1. imavě
  • 2. imata
  • 3. imate
jasti ("eat")
  • 1. jamь
  • 2. jasi
  • 3. jastъ
  • 1. jamъ
  • 2. jaste
  • 3. jadętъ
  • 1. javě
  • 2. jasta
  • 3. jaste

One should distinguish the verbs iměti (imamь, imaši, imatъ), imati (jemljǫ, jemleši, jemletъ) and jęti (imǫ, imeši, imetъ). Exceptional is also the verb xotěti which exhibits iotation even though it's not an i-type verb (xoštǫ, xošteši, xoštetъ).

Aorist

The aorist is used both to narrate individual events taking place at a specific time in the past, "without reference to other events taking place at the same time or subsequently" [23] and to narrate the beginning or end of events of longer duration. Its most important function is to show that an event took place in the past, rather than to show that it is completed.

The aorist form of imperfective verbs is used instead of the perfective aspect in the case of verbs of motion and perception, as well as of the verbs iměti, and jasti. Imperfective verbs in the aorist are also used when an entire action is negated, and may be used for verbs of saying, although the usual form for "he said" is from a perfective verb, reče. [24]

Asigmatic aorist

The asigmatic aorist (also called root or simple aorist) was named after the loss of the phoneme /s/ in the inflection (AGr. sigma ), i.e. there is no VsV > VxV change (intervocalic /s/ yielding /x/). Over time, the asigmatic aorist became increasingly marked as an archaic language feature and was eventually replaced by the other two aorist formations.

The asigmatic aorist was formed by adding to the infinitive stem of e-type verbs with stem ending in a consonant (i.e. verbs with the infix -nǫ-, which is dropped before the aorist endings, and verbs with the null infix) the following endings: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.

VerbSingularPluralDual
pasti (pad-) ("fall")1. pad -ъ

2. pad -e
3. pad -e

1. pad -omъ

2. pad -ete
3. pad -ǫ

1. pad -ově

2. pad -eta
3. pad -ete

tešti (tek-) ("flow")1. tek -ъ

2. teč -e
3. teč -e

1. tek -omъ

2. teč -ete
3. tek -ǫ

1. tek -ově

2. teč -eta
3. teč -ete

mošti (mog-) ("be able to")1. mog -ъ

2. mož -e
3. mož -e

1. mog -omъ

2. mož -ete
3. mog -ǫ

1. mog -ově

2. mož -eta
3. mož -ete

dvignǫti (dvig-) ("move")1. dvig -ъ

2. dviž -e
3. dviž -e

1. dvig -omъ

2. dviž -ete
3. dvig -ǫ

1. dvig -ově

2. dviž -eta
3. dviž -ete

Sigmatic aorist

The sigmatic or s-aorist was formed in the following ways:

  • Verbs whose stem ends in b, p, d, t, z, s form this aorist by dropping the final consonant and adding the interfix -s- plus the endings -ъ, -, -; -omъ, -te, -ę; -ově, -ta, -te. Intervocalic sigma (s) exhibits no change. As a side effect, e is lengthened to ě, and o to a.
  • Verbs whose stem ends in r or k form this aorist in the same way as previously mentioned, except that intervocalic sigma (s) changes into x, the same set of endings being suffixed to the interfix. As a side effect, e is lengthened to ě, and o to a.
  • Verbs whose stem ends in a vowel form this aorist by suffixing exactly the same set of endings to the infinitive stem, and intervocalic -s- changes into -x-.
The 2nd and 3rd person singular forms of these verbs match the infinitive stem due to the elision of word-final sigma.
VerbSingularPluralDual
xvaliti (xvali-)1. xvali -x -ъ

2. xvali
3. xvali

1. xvali -x -omъ

2. xvali -s -te
3. xvali -š -ę

1. xvali -x -ově

2. xvali -s -ta
3. xvali -s -te

tešti (tek-)1. těxъ (tek -s -ъ)

2. teče
3. teče

1. těxomъ (tek -s -omъ)

2. těste
3. těšę

1. těxově (tek -s -ově)

2. těsta
3. těste

greti (greb-)1. grěsъ

2. grebe
3. grebe

1. grěsomъ

2. grěste
3. grěsę

1. grěsově

2. grěsta
3. grěste

bosti (bod-)1. basъ

2. bode
3. bode

1. basomъ

2. baste
3. basę

1. basově

2. basta
3. baste

New aorist

The new aorist (also known as ox-aorist) is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem of e-type verbs ending in a consonant (verbs with the interfix -nǫ- and verbs with the null interfix) the interfix -os- (-ox) and onto it the endings -ъ, -, -; -omъ, -te, -ę; -ově, -ta, -te. Intervocalic sigma s changes into x.

The 2nd and the 3rd person singular forms are not attested and thus the asigmatic aorist forms are taken as a replacement.

VerbSingularPluralDual
krasti (krad-) ("steal")1. krad -ox -ъ

2. (krad -e)
3. (krad -e)

1. krad -ox -omъ

2. krad -os -te
3. krad - -ę

1. krad -ox -ově

2. krad -os -ta
3. krad -os -te

rešti (rek-)1. rek -ox -ъ

2. (reč -e)
3. (reč -e)

1. rek -ox -omъ

2. rek -os -te
3. rek - -ę

1. rek -ox -ově

2. rek -os -ta
3. rek -os -te

iti (id-) ("go/walk")1. id -ox -ъ

2. (id -e)
3. (id -e)

1. id -ox -omъ

2. id -os -te
3. id - -ę

1. id -ox -ově

2. id -os -ta
3. id -os -te

Imperfect

The imperfect is used either for continuous or repeated actions in the past. It is typically used to form a background in a narration, and forms a contrast with the aorist and other verb forms: it often shows that an action took place at the same time as another. Actions in the imperfect are almost always incomplete, and the tense is typically only used with verbs in the imperfective aspect. Rarely, it can be formed with perfective verbs. [25]

There are two ways of forming the imperfect:

1. If the infinitive stems ends in -a or , the interfix -ax- is appended (which changes to -aš- according to the first palatalization in front of e) and onto it, the endings of the asigmatic aorist: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.

VerbSingularPluralDual
glagolati (glagola-) ("speak")1. glagola -ax -ъ

2. glagola - -e
3. glagola - -e

1. glagola -ax -omъ

2. glagola - -ete
3. glagola -ax -ǫ

1. glagola -ax -ově

2. glagola - -eta
3. glagola - -ete

viděti (vidě-) ("see")1. vidě -ax -ъ

2. vidě - -e
3. vidě - -e

1. vidě -ax -omъ

2. vidě - -ete
3. vidě -ax -ǫ

1. vidě -ax -ově

2. vidě - -eta
3. vidě - -ete

2. The other way of forming the imperfect, applying to all other verbal stems, is by adding onto the present stem the interfix -ěax- (which, in accordance with the first palatalization, is changed to -ěaš- in front of e) and onto it the endings of asigmatic aorist: -ъ, -e, -e; -omъ, -ete, -ǫ; -ově, -eta, -ete.

VerbSingularPluralDual
zъvati (zov-) ("call")1. zov -ě -ax -ъ

2. zov -ě - -e
3. zov -ě - -e

1. zov -ě -ax -omъ

2. zov -ě - -ete
3. zov -ě -ax -ǫ

1. zov -ě -ax -ově

2. zov -ě - -eta
3. zov -ě - -ete

bosti (bod-) ("stab")1. bod -ě -ax -ъ

2. bod -ě - -e
3. bod -ě - -e

1. bod -ě -ax -omъ

2. bod -ě - -ete
3. bod -ě -ax -ǫ

1. bod -ě -ax -ově

2. bod -ě - -eta
3. bod -ě - -ete

Both of these imperfect formations often occur side by side in verbs with stem alternation:

In the texts of the OCS canon the forms are often contracted, so that ěax becomes ěx and aax becomes ax. An illustrating example is in Chernorizets Hrabar's famous work O pismenex "An Account of Letters":

Prěžde ubo slověne ne iměxǫ knigъ, nǫ črъtami i rězami čьtěxǫ i gataaxǫ, pogani sǫšte.

Some forms exhibit sound changes, namely palatalization or iotation in front of ě, yat thus turning into a. The same applies if the stem ends in j which is then reduced in front of yat and yat again changes into a:

That the second form and not the first is the original one (the first being formed by the change of yat to a) is confirmed by the imperfect paradigm of the verb byti:

VerbSingularPluralDual
byti1. běaxъ

2. běaše
3. běaše

1. běaxomъ

2. běašete
3. běaxǫ

1. běaxově

2. běašeta
3. běašete

Participles

Present active participle

The present active participle is formed by adding the following endings to the present stem:

1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:

  • present stem + -y (masculine and neuter) and -ǫšti (feminine)
(e.g., greti (greb-) > greby; grebǫšti)

2. e-type verbs whose present stem ends in a palatal:

  • present stem + (masculine and neuter) and -ǫšti (feminine)
(e.g., kupovati (kupuj-) > kupuję, kupujǫšti)

3. i-type verbs:

  • present stem + (masculine and neuter) and -ęšti (feminine)
(e.g., ljubiti (ljub-) > ljubę, ljubęšti)

Present passive participle

The present passive participle is formed by suffixing to the present stem the endings -o/e/i + m + ъ/a/o (masculine, feminine, neuter):

1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:

  • present stem + o + m + ъ/a/o
(e.g., pešti (pek-) > pekomъ, pekoma, pekomo)

2. e-type verbs whose stem ends in a palatal:

  • present stem + e + m + ъ/a/o
(e.g., želeti (želj-) > željemъ, željema, željemo)

3. i-type verbs:

  • present stem + i + m + ъ/a/o
(e.g., xvaliti (xval-) > xvalimъ, xvalima, xvalimo)

Past active participle

The past active participle is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem the following endings:

1. e-type verbs and athematic verbs:

  • infinitive stem + (masculine and neuter) or -ъši (feminine)
(e.g., bosti (bod-) > bodъ, bodъši)

2. i-type verbs exhibit epenthetic v, which eliminates hiatus:

  • infinitive stem + -vъ (masculine and neuter) or -vъši (feminine)
(e.g., xvaliti (xvali-) > xvalivъ, xvalivъši)

The latter i-type verbs have twofold forms of this participle – the mentioned one of older origin, and a newer one which arose due to analogical leveling:

  • nositi (nosi-) > nošъ, nošъši (by iotation from + jъ, jъši) or nosivъ, nosivъši
  • roditi (rod-) > roždъ, roždъši (by iotation from + jъ, jъši) or rodivъ, rodivъši

3. Verbs with liquid metathesis form this participle from its older stem form:

  • mrěti (< *merti) > mьrъ, mьrъši (and not mrěvъ, mrěvъši)
  • prostrěti (< *prosterti) > prostьrъ, prostьrъši (and not prostrěvъ, prostrěvъši)

4. Irregular participles:

  • iti > šьdъ, šьdъši
  • jaxati > javъ, javъši

l-participle

The l-participle (also known as the resultative participle or second past active participle) is formed by adding to the infinitive stem the interfix -l- and the endings ъ/a/o. If the stem ends in -t or -d, this consonant is dropped.

  • xvaliti (xvali) > xvalilъ, xvalila, xvalilo
  • plesti (plet-) > plelъ, plela, plelo

Past passive participle

The past passive participle is formed by suffixing to the infinitive stem the following endings:

1. Verbs with stem ending in a consonant, -y or -i:

  • infinitive stem + en + ъ/a/o
(e.g., bosti (bod-) > bodenъ, bodena, bodeno)
(e.g., nositi (nosi-) > nošenъ, nošena, nošeno – by iotation from nosi + enъ > nosjenъ > nošenъ)
(e.g., umyti with interfix -ъv- > umъvenъ, umъvena, umъveno)

2. Verbs with stem ending in -a or :

  • infinitive stem + n + ъ/a/o
(e.g., glagolati (glagola-) > glagolanъ, glagolana, glagolano)
(e.g., viděti (vidě-) > vižden, viždena, viždeno – by iotation from viděn, viděna, viděno)

3. Verbs with stem ending in , -u, -i and (obtained by liquid metathesis):

  • infinitive stem + t + ъ/a/o
(e.g., klęti (klę-) > klętъ, klęta, klęto)
(e.g., obuti (obu-) > obutъ, obuta, obuto)
(e.g., mrěti (mrě-) > mrětъ, mrěta, mrěto)
(e.g., viti (vi-) > vitъ, vita, vito)

Of the latter verbs, those with stem ending in -i (viti, biti etc.) can also form the past passive participle like the verbs in the first group: bitъ or bijenъ, vitъ or vijenъ etc.).

Compound tenses

Perfect

The perfect is formed by combining the l-participle with the imperfective present forms of the auxiliary verb byti.

  • nosilъ/a/ojesmь, jesi, jestъ
  • nosili/y/ajesmъ, jeste, sǫtь
  • nosila/ě/ějesvě, jesta, jeste

Pluperfect

The pluperfect can be formed in multiple ways, by combining the l-participle with the perfect, imperfect or aorist formation of the auxiliary verb byti.

  • nosilъ/a/obylъ/a/o jesmь or běaxъ or běxъ
  • nosili/y/abyli/y/a jesmъ or běaxomъ or běxomъ
  • nosila/ě/ěbyla/ě/ě jesvě or běaxově or běxově

Future

The future tense is usually expressed using the present tense form of the perfective verb. Imperfective verbs form the future tense by combining the auxiliary verb (byti, xotěti, načęti, iměti) and the infinitive.

  • bǫdǫ / xoštǫ / načьnǫ / imamьxvaliti

Future perfect

The future perfect is formed by combining the l-participle with the perfective present of the auxiliary verb byti.

  • nosilъ/a/obǫdǫ, bǫdeši, bǫdetъ
  • nosili/y/abǫdemъ, bǫdete, bǫdǫtъ
  • nosila/ě/ěbǫdevě, bǫdeta, bǫdete

Conditional

The conditional (or conditional-optative) modal formation is formed by combining the l-participle with special modal forms of the auxiliary verb byti (with unattested dual forms):

  • nosilъ/a/obimь, bi, bi
  • nosili/y/abimъ, biste, bǫ/bišę

An alternative conditional is formed with the perfective aorist forms of byti:

  • nosilъ/a/obyxъ, by, by
  • nosili/y/abyxomъ, byste, byšę

Adverbs

Primary adverbs

These are original adverbs with difficult to guess etymology and origin.

Derived adverbs

Pronominal adverbs

Pronominal adverbs are derived by suffixing pronouns (e.g., ov + amo = ovamo, + de = kъde):

  • -amo = direction of movement (tamo, kamo, onamo)
  • -ako / -ače = way, mode, manner (tako, inako, inače)
  • -de = place (sьde, onude, vьsьde)
  • -gda = time (tъgda, kъgda, egda)
  • -lь / -li / / -lě / -lьma / -lьmi = measure, amount (kolь, kolě, kolьmi)

Nominal adverbs

Nominal adverbs are derived from nominals or turn by conversion to adverbs which are in fact inflective lexemes with adverbial semantics.

Modal adverbs are created with the suffixes -o or (the endings of accusative and locative singular neuter gender respectively), with no difference in meanings between suffixes, although some adverbs have only the forms in -o (veselo), and some in (javě).

Modal adverbs could also be formed deadjectivally by means of the interfix -ьsk- and the ending -y (by origin, the instrumental plural ending; e.g., slověnьsky).

Adverbs could also be formed with the suffix (pravь, različь) and are by origin probably inherited Proto-Slavic accusative forms.

Frequently occurring are the adverbialized a-stem instrumentals such as jednьnojǫ and also adverbially used oblique cases.

Locative adverbs are by origin mostly petrified locative case forms of nouns: gorě, dolě, nizu, and the same can be said for temporal adverbs: zimě, polu dьne.

Prepositions

Primary prepositions

The primary and non-derived prepositions are of PIE and PSl. heritage:

Secondary prepositions

The secondary prepositions are derived from adverbial expressions: vьslědъ from vь slědъ, prěžde is a comparative form of prědъ etc.

Conjunctions and particles

Conjunctions and particles are not easily separable because they sometimes function as an intensifier, and sometimes as a conjunction.

Notes

  1. 1 2 Gardiner 1984, p. 89.
  2. 1 2 Gardiner 1984, p. 91.
  3. Gardiner 1984, pp. 91–92.
  4. Gardiner 1984, p. 93.
  5. Gardiner 1984, p. 98.
  6. Gardiner 1984, p. 94.
  7. Gardiner 1984, pp. 96–97.
  8. Gardiner 1984, pp. 97–98.
  9. Gardiner 1984, pp. 98–99.
  10. 1 2 3 Gardiner 1984, p. 99.
  11. Gardiner 1984, p. 100.
  12. Gardiner 1984, pp. 100–101.
  13. Gardiner 1984, p. 101.
  14. Gardiner 1984, pp. 101–102.
  15. Gardiner 1984, pp. 103–104.
  16. Gardiner 1984, pp. 104–105.
  17. Gardiner 1984, pp. 105–107.
  18. Gardiner 1984, pp. 107–108.
  19. Gardiner 1984, p. 109.
  20. Gardiner 1984, pp. 109–110.
  21. 1 2 Gardiner 1984, p. 110.
  22. Gardiner 1984, p. 111.
  23. Gardiner 1984, p. 122.
  24. Gardiner 1984, p. 123.
  25. Gardiner 1984, pp. 123–125.

Related Research Articles

Infinitive is a linguistics term for certain verb forms existing in many languages, most often used as non-finite verbs. As with many linguistic concepts, there is not a single definition applicable to all languages. The name is derived from Late Latin [modus] infinitivus, a derivative of infinitus meaning "unlimited".

The Finnish language is spoken by the majority of the population in Finland and by ethnic Finns elsewhere. Unlike the languages spoken in neighbouring countries, such as Swedish and Norwegian, which are North Germanic languages, or Russian, which is a Slavic language, Finnish is a Uralic language of the Finnic languages group. Typologically, Finnish is agglutinative. As in some other Uralic languages, Finnish has vowel harmony, and like other Finnic languages, it has consonant gradation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin grammar</span> Grammar of the Latin language

Latin is a heavily inflected language with largely free word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case; pronouns and adjectives are inflected for number, case, and gender; and verbs are inflected for person, number, tense, aspect, voice, and mood. The inflections are often changes in the ending of a word, but can be more complicated, especially with verbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catalan grammar</span> Morphology and syntax of Catalan

Catalan grammar, the morphology and syntax of the Catalan language, is similar to the grammar of most other Romance languages. Catalan is a relatively synthetic, fusional language. Features include:

Russian grammar employs an Indo-European inflexional structure, with considerable adaptation.

In Portuguese grammar, nouns, adjectives, pronouns, and articles are moderately inflected: there are two genders and two numbers. The case system of the ancestor language, Latin, has been lost, but personal pronouns are still declined with three main types of forms: subject, object of verb, and object of preposition. Most nouns and many adjectives can take diminutive or augmentative derivational suffixes, and most adjectives can take a so-called "superlative" derivational suffix. Adjectives usually follow their respective nouns.

Turkish grammar, as described in this article, is the grammar of standard Turkish as spoken and written by educated people in the Republic of Turkey.

The grammar of the Polish language is complex and characterized by a high degree of inflection, and has relatively free word order, although the dominant arrangement is subject–verb–object (SVO). There commonly are no articles, and there is frequent dropping of subject pronouns. Distinctive features include the different treatment of masculine personal nouns in the plural, and the complex grammar of numerals and quantifiers.

Ancient Greek grammar is morphologically complex and preserves several features of Proto-Indo-European morphology. Nouns, adjectives, pronouns, articles, numerals and especially verbs are all highly inflected.

The grammar of Modern Greek, as spoken in present-day Greece and Cyprus, is essentially that of Demotic Greek, but it has also assimilated certain elements of Katharevousa, the archaic, learned variety of Greek imitating Classical Greek forms, which used to be the official language of Greece through much of the 19th and 20th centuries. Modern Greek grammar has preserved many features of Ancient Greek, but has also undergone changes in a similar direction as many other modern Indo-European languages, from more synthetic to more analytic structures.

In Hebrew, verbs, which take the form of derived stems, are conjugated to reflect their tense and mood, as well as to agree with their subjects in gender, number, and person. Each verb has an inherent voice, though a verb in one voice typically has counterparts in other voices. This article deals mostly with Modern Hebrew, but to some extent, the information shown here applies to Biblical Hebrew as well.

Eastern Lombard grammar reflects the main features of Romance languages: the word order of Eastern Lombard is usually SVO, nouns are inflected in number, adjectives agree in number and gender with the nouns, verbs are conjugated in tenses, aspects and moods and agree with the subject in number and person. The case system is present only for the weak form of the pronoun.

The grammar of Ukrainian describes its phonological, morphological, and syntactic rules. Ukrainian has seven cases and two numbers for its nominal declension and two aspects, three tenses, three moods, and two voices for its verbal conjugation. Adjectives agree in number, gender, and case with their nouns.

Icelandic is an inflected language. Icelandic nouns can have one of three grammatical genders: masculine, feminine or neuter. Nouns, adjectives and pronouns are declined in four cases and two numbers, singular and plural.

This article discusses the grammar of the Western Lombard (Insubric) language. The examples are in Milanese, written according to the Classical Milanese orthography.

Serbo-Croatian is a South Slavic language that, like most other Slavic languages, has an extensive system of inflection. This article describes exclusively the grammar of the Shtokavian dialect, which is a part of the South Slavic dialect continuum and the basis for the Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, and Serbian standard variants of Serbo-Croatian. "An examination of all the major 'levels' of language shows that BCS is clearly a single language with a single grammatical system."

This article concerns the morphology of the Albanian language, including the declension of nouns and adjectives, and the conjugation of verbs. It refers to the Tosk-based Albanian standard regulated by the Academy of Sciences of Albania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Slavic language</span> Proto-language of all the Slavic languages

Proto-Slavic is the unattested, reconstructed proto-language of all Slavic languages. It represents Slavic speech approximately from the 2nd millennium BC through the 6th century AD. As with most other proto-languages, no attested writings have been found; scholars have reconstructed the language by applying the comparative method to all the attested Slavic languages and by taking into account other Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interslavic</span> Pan-Slavic language

Interslavic is a pan-Slavic auxiliary language project. Its purpose is to facilitate communication between speakers of various Slavic languages, as well as to allow people who do not speak a Slavic language to communicate with Slavic speakers by being mutually intelligible with most, if not all, Slavic languages. For Slavs and non-Slavs, it can fulfill an educational role as well.

The grammar of the Silesian language is characterized by a high degree of inflection, and has relatively free word order, although the dominant arrangement is subject–verb–object (SVO). There commonly are no articles, and there is frequent dropping of subject pronouns. Distinctive features include the different treatment of masculine personal nouns in the plural, and the complex grammar of numerals and quantifiers.

References