Italian grammar is the body of rules describing the properties of the Italian language. Italian words can be divided into the following lexical categories: articles, nouns, adjectives, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections.
Italian articles vary according to definiteness (definite, indefinite, and partitive), number, gender, and the initial sound of the subsequent word. Partitive articles compound the preposition di with the corresponding definite article, to express uncertain quantity. In the plural, they typically translate into English as "few"; in the singular, typically as "some".
Standard masculine singular definite article, used in all cases other than those detailed below.[1]
Foreign words beginning with ⟨w⟩, pronounced /w/ or /v/, take il and not lo: il West/ˈwɛst/ (referring to the American Old West), il whisky/ˈwiski/, il Watt/ˈvat/, etc.[2]
before ⟨s⟩ pronounced as /s/, /z/, or /ʃ/ followed by another consonant ("impure s", Italian: S (esse) complicata, S impura, or S preconsonantica)
before self-geminating consonants:[3]⟨z⟩, pronounced as /ts/ or /dz/; ⟨gn⟩; ⟨gli⟩; ⟨sci⟩ (or ⟨sh⟩ or ⟨ch⟩ in loan words, e.g. lo chef) pronounced as /ʃ/
before complex consonant clusters ⟨ps⟩, pronounced as /ps/ or /ss/; ⟨pn⟩ as /pn/ or /nn/; ⟨x⟩ as /ks/ or /ss/, ⟨mn⟩ as /mn/ or /nn/, etc., mostly foreign words
before ⟨y⟩ or ⟨i⟩ pronounced as semivowel /j/, (e.g. foreign words such as lo yoghurt, and local words and scientific or geographical names such as lo iodio)
Used instead of un before "impure s", self-geminating consonants, and complex consonant clusters, following the same rules as lo vs. il above, for example: uno studente.
Nouns have gender (masculine, feminine or, in many instances, both) and inflect in number (singular and plural). When a noun refers to people or animals with natural gender, grammatical gender typically corresponds. The gender each noun is written in is the opposite of arbitrary. Because most nouns have a masculine and a feminine form, the form the given noun is written in could change the entire structure of the sentence. As in most other Romance languages, the historical neuter has merged with the masculine. A subgroup of these deriving from Latin's second declension are considered feminine in the plural. Subclauses and infinitives are masculine. Adjectives inflect for gender and number in patterns broadly similar to nouns.
General noun and adjectival endings by number and gender
Gender
Singular
Plural
Example
Masculine
-o
-i
il cappello nero, i cappelli neri ('the black hat(s)')
Feminine
-a
-e
la bella macchina, le belle macchine ('the beautiful car(s)')
In the last two examples, only the article carries information about gender and number.
Most masculine words that end in -io pronounced as /jo/ drop the -o and thus end in -i in the plural: vecchio / vecchi ('old'), funzionario / funzionari ('functionary(-ies)'), esempio / esempi ('example(s)'), etc.
The Italian hard and soft C and G phenomenon leads to certain peculiarities in spelling and pronunciation:
Words in -cio and -gio form plurals in -ci and -gi, e.g. bacio / baci ('kiss(es)')
Words in -cia and -gia have been a point of contention. According to a commonly employed rule,[4] they:
form plurals in -ce and -ge if the final letter before the suffix is a consonant: frangia, frange ('fringe(s)'); faccia, facce ('face(s)').
form plurals in -cie and -gie if the final letter before the suffix is a vowel: camicia, camicie ('shirt(s)'); ciliegia, ciliegie ('cherry'/'cherries'). Note that the presence of an i in the plural ending has no impact on the pronunciation in this case.[5]
when the i is stressed, it always remains in plural: farmacia / farmacie ('chemist's shop(s)'), nevralgia / nevralgie ('neuralgia(s)').
Words in -co and -go behave irregularly: for some words the plural form causes the hard consonant to become soft, and for others the consonant remains hard. "The grammarians are skeptical of any attempt at giving a ruling about this area."[6] There are, however, certain rules of thumb:
plurals are formed with -chi and -ghi if the last letter before the suffix is a consonant or a stressed vowel: fungo / funghi ('mushroom(s)'), stecco / stecchi ('stick(s)'), mago / maghi ('magician(s)'), fuoco / fuochi ('fire(s)')
plurals are formed with -ci and -gi if the last letter before the suffix is an unstressed vowel: comico / comici ('comedian(s)'), medico / medici ('physician(s)')
in words ending with -logo suffix, the plural is usually[6] in -gi when -logo means 'expert' or 'student', corresponding to English -logist (e.g. archeologo / archeologi, 'archaeologist(s)'), while it is in -ghi when it means 'speech' or 'reasoning', corresponding often to English -logue/-log (e.g. catalogo / cataloghi, 'catalogue(s)').
there are exceptions such as amico / amici ('friend(s)'), greco / greci ('Greek(s)'), valico / valichi ('mountain pass(es)'), carico / carichi ('cargo(s)').
Words in -ca and -ga form plurals in -che and -ghe, e.g. amica / amiche ('female friend(s)')
Nouns
Most nouns are derived from Latin. Many of these are themselves borrowed from Greek (e.g. poeta below). Although Italian nouns do not inflect for case, they are derived from a mixture of the Latin nominative and accusative cases:
Nouns ending in any letter other than -a, -e or -o, as well as nouns ending in a stressed vowel, are normally invariable in the plural. Thus:
la gru / le gru ('the crane(s)', from Latin grūs / grūes)
la città / le città ('the city(ies)', contracted form of archaic cittade, cittadi, from Latin cīvitātem, cīvitātēs)
il caffè / i caffè ('the coffee(s)')
il film / i film ('the film(s)')
There are certain words (derived from Latin second-declension neuter nouns) that are masculine in the singular and feminine or masculine in the plural. Examples include:
il braccio / le braccia or i bracci ('the arm(s)')
l'uovo / le uova ('the egg(s)')
il ginocchio / le ginocchia or i ginocchi ('the knee(s)')
il sopracciglio / le sopracciglia or i sopraccigli ('the eyebrow(s)')
These nouns' endings derive regularly from the Latin neuter endings of the second declension (sg. -um / pl. -a), but there are some from the third declension as well: e.g. il gregge / le greggi ('flock(s)', but i greggi works, too); the tradition of calling them "irregular" or "mobile gender" (genere mobile) would come from the paradigm that there are so few nouns of this type that the existence of neuter can be considered vestigial (compared to Romanian, which has many more nouns of the masculine singular–feminine plural type, and as such are usually classified as a separate neuter gender). The choice of plural is sometimes left to the user, while in some cases there are differences of meaning:[8]
Sometimes, for body parts, the feminine/neuter plural denotes the literal meaning while the masculine one denotes a figurative meaning: il braccio ('the arm') / le braccia ('the arms') / i bracci ('the isthmuses', 'the inlets'); il corno ('the horn') / le corna ('the horns' of an animal) / i corni ('the horns' as musical instruments)
Sometimes, especially in poetic and old-fashioned Italian, the masculine plural acts as a count noun, while the neuter/feminine plural acts as a mass noun: il cervello ('the brain') / due cervelli ('two brains') / le cervella ('the cerebral matter'); l'anello ('the ring') / due anelli ('two rings') / le anella ('ringlets'); furthermore, il dito ('the finger') / le dita ('the fingers') and also due dita ('two fingers') / but i diti indici ('the index fingers')
Most noun stems are derived from the accusative: Latin socer/socerum begets Italian suocero, and Latin pēs/pēdem begets Italian piede. There are a few exceptions, however, such as uomo from Latin homo/hominem and moglie from Latin mulier/mulierem. Neuter third-declension nouns may bequeath Italian nouns either from the nominative/accusative case (e.g. capo from caput, cuore from cor) or from the oblique case used for other cases and for the plural (e.g. latte from lac, lact-, giure from ius, iur-).
Irregular plurals
There are a few genuine irregular plurals in Italian (plurali irregolari). Most of these were introduced in Vulgar Latin, but some derive from irregular Latin plurals. Examples include:
uomo / uomini ('man'/'men'; Latin homo / homines)
il dio / gli dei ('god(s)'; note also the irregularity in the article: gli instead of i)
bue / buoi ('ox(en)'; Latin bovem / boves)
tempio / templi ('temple(s)'; the plural retains the l from Vulgar Latin templi[9] in order to distinguish it from tempi, the plural of tempo; the l is lost in the singular)
Alteration
In Italian, altered nouns are nouns with particular shades of meaning. They are divided into diminutives, vezzeggiativi (diminutives with kindness and sympathy nuance), augmentatives and pejoratives.
Many other alterations can be built, sometimes with more than one suffix: for example, libro ('book') can become libretto (diminutive), libricino (double diminutive), libercolo (diminutive + pejorative), libraccio (pejorative), libraccione (pejorative + augmentative). Uomo ('man'), coming from Latin homo, becomes om- in altered forms: omino/ometto (diminutive), omone (augmentative), omaccio (pejorative), omaccione (augmentative + pejorative).
Adjectives
In Italian, an adjective can be placed before or after the noun. The unmarked placement for most adjectives (e.g. colours, nationalities) is after the noun,[10] but this is reversed for a few common classes of adjective—those denoting beauty, age, goodness, and size are placed before the noun in the unmarked case, and after the noun for emphasis.
Placing the adjective after the noun can alter its meaning or indicate restrictiveness of reference. If a noun has many adjectives, usually no more than one will be before the noun.[citation needed]
un libro rosso = a red book (the unmarked case)
un rosso libro = a book that is red (the marked case; it is especially important to the intended meaning that the book is red, as opposed to some other color)
un buon uomo = a good man (the unmarked case)
un uomo buono = a man who is good (the marked case; it is especially important to the intended meaning that he is good, the adjective is emphasized)
The comparative and relative superlative are formed with più ('more', 'most'); for instance:
sono più alto di te ("I am taller than you")
sono il più alto fra gli uomini ("I am the tallest of men")
Vice versa when expressing inferiority, meno ('less, fewer') is used; for instance:
sono il meno forte del campionato ("I am the least strong of the championship")
tu sei meno alto di me ("You are less tall than me")
Another comparative form is made with the word come ('as', 'like'); for instance:
sono alto come te ("I am as tall as you")
The absolute comparative is formed by placing troppo ('too') before the adjective; for instance:
sei troppo buono ("you are too good").
The absolute superlative, derived from the Latin synthetic superlative in -issimus, is formed by adding -issimo to an adjective: intelligente ('intelligent'), intelligentissimo ('very intelligent'); sporco ('dirty') sporchissimo ('very dirty'). If the two letters before the last vowel are pr or br (e.g., aspro, celebre), the r is removed and -errimo is the suffix used (asperrimo, celeberrimo) ('very sour', 'very famous'). Another way to form the absolute superlative is to place either molto or assai ('very') before the adjective. For instance sporchissimo and molto sporco ('very dirty') are the same, although the form ending in issimo is usually perceived as more emphatic; that is, sporchissimo is dirtier than molto sporco.[citation needed]
Some adjectives have irregular comparatives (although with regularly-formed variants also in common use), such as
buono ('good'), migliore / più buono ('better' or 'best'), ottimo / buonissimo ('very good')
cattivo ('bad'), peggiore / più cattivo ('worse' or 'worst'), pessimo / cattivissimo ('very bad')
grande ('big'), maggiore / più grande ('bigger'), massimo / grandissimo ('very big')
piccolo ('small'), minore / più piccolo ('smaller'), minimo / piccolissimo ('very small')
Possessive adjectives
With the exception of 3rd person plural loro, 'their', possessive adjectives, like articles, must agree with the gender and number of the noun they modify. Hence, mio zio ('my uncle'), but mia zia ('my aunt'). So depending on what is being modified, the possessive adjectives are:
Person
Masculine
Feminine
Singular
Plural
Singular
Plural
1st sing.
mio
miei
mia
mie
2nd sing.
tuo
tuoi
tua
tue
3rd sing.
suo
suoi
sua
sue
1st pl.
nostro
nostri
nostra
nostre
2nd pl.
vostro
vostri
vostra
vostre
3rd pl.
loro
In most cases the possessive adjective is used with an article, usually the definite article:
The only exception is when the possessive refers to an individual family member (unless the family member is described or characterised in some way):
Laura è mia sorella
("Laura is my sister.")
Ieri ho visto mia sorella Diana
("I saw my sister Diana yesterday.")
Questa penna è di mia zia.
("This pen is my aunt's.")
Mamma and papà (or babbo, in central Italy; 'mother' and 'father'), however, are usually used with the article.
For emphasis, however, possessive adjectives are sometimes placed after the noun. This is usually after words such as colpa ('fault', 'sin'); casa ('house', 'home'); merito ('merit'); piacere ('pleasure'); or in vocative expressions.
È colpa sua.
("It is his/her fault.")
Oh dio mio!
("Oh, my god!")
Arrivederci, amico mio!
("Goodbye, my friend!")
Vorresti andare a casa mia?
("Would you like to come over to my house?")
If the antecedent of a third person possessive (being used as an object) is the subject of the sentence, proprio can be used instead of suo,[11] although the usage of proprio is declining in spoken language:[citation needed]
Marco e Maria hanno discusso di filosofia. Marco ha scelto il proprio punto di vista.
("Marco and Maria discussed philosophy. Marco took his own point of view.")
Marco e Maria hanno discusso di filosofia. Marco ha scelto il suo punto di vista.
("Marco and Maria discussed philosophy. Marco took his/her point of view.")
The first sentence is unambiguous and states that Marco took his own point of view, whereas the second sentence is ambiguous because it may mean that Marco took either his own or Maria's point of view.
Demonstrative adjectives
Italian originally had three degrees of demonstrative adjectives: questo (for items near or related to the first person speaker: 'this'), quello (for items near or related to an eventual third person: 'that'), and codesto (for items near or related to an eventual second person). The usage has undergone a simplification, including the meaning of codesto in quello, and only Tuscan speakers still use codesto. Its use is very rare in modern language, and the word has acquired a rather pejorative connotation.
Pronouns
Italian features a sizeable set of pronouns. Personal pronouns are inflected for person, number, case, and, in the third person, gender. Literary subject pronouns also have a distinction between animate (egli, ella) and inanimate (esso, essa) antecedents, although this is lost in colloquial usage, where lui, lei and loro are the most used forms for animate subjects, while no specific pronoun is employed for inanimate subjects (if needed, demonstrative pronouns such as questo or quello may be used). There is also the uninflected pronoun ciò, which is only used with abstract antecedents.
Personal pronouns are normally omitted in the subject, as the conjugation is usually enough to determine the grammatical person. They are used when some emphasis is needed, e.g. sono italiano ('I am Italian') vs. io sono italiano ('I [specifically, as opposed to others] am Italian').
The words ci, vi and ne act both as personal pronouns (respectively instrumental and genitive case) and clitic pro-forms for "there" (ci and vi, with identical meaning—as in c'è, ci sono, v'è, vi sono, ci vengo, etc.) and "from there" (ne—as in: è entrato in casa alle 10:00 e ne è uscito alle 11:00).
1 2 3 4 5 6 Often elided to m', t', l', c', etc. (except loro) before vowels (especially i) and h in colloquial speech, especially in central and southern Italy, and less often in written language. The extent to which individual pronouns are elided varies, ranging from virtually always (lo and la) to rarely (ne).
↑ Alone, as in Ti do un libro, and sometimes with other clitic pronouns (see below)
↑ Sometimes before other clitic pronouns (see below), as in Te lo do
↑ When unstressed accusative pronouns are used in compound tenses, the final vowel of the past participle must agree in gender and number with the accusative pronoun. For example, Hai comprato i cocomeri e le mele? ("Did you buy the watermelons and the apples?") – Li [i cocomeri] ho comprati ma non le [le mele] ho comprate ("I bought them [the former] but I did not buy them [the latter]"). This also happens when the underlying pronoun is made opaque by elision: l'ho svegliato ("I woke him up"), versus L'ho svegliata ("I woke her up").
1 2 3 4 Although traditionally impersonal, essa is occasionally seen used as a personal pronoun, which is never the case with esso; the plurals essi and esse are more frequently used as personal pronouns than their singular counterparts as they commonly supplant the personal plural pronouns elli and elle in contemporary usage.
1 2 3 4 Previously only accusative, today lui, lei and loro are also accepted as nominative.
↑ Combines with the following pronoun to form one word; compare Gliene sono grato with Te ne sono grato. Only possible with lo, la, li, le, and ne (see below) to form glielo, gliela, glieli, gliele, and gliene.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lei, Loro, Essi, Esse and traditionally Ella and Elle (spelled this way) are also used as formal second-person pronouns (see below).
1 2 The plural forms of egli and ella are generally considered archaic, owing to: common supplantation by essi and esse respectively; and the rarity of even the singular pronouns in vernacular usage.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 When a distinction is made between egli / ella (animate) and esso/a (inanimate), in the nominative case essi/e is usually the plural of both the animate and the inanimate pronouns. However, in the accusative, as well as the object of prepositions (as in di lui / di lei, di esso/a), essi/e can be used only for inanimate nouns, while loro must be used for animate nouns instead.
↑ Not used like most clitics, simply follows the verb as with normal nouns. Compare Gli dico (3rd person m. sg., clitic form I.) with Dico loro (3rd person m. and f. pl.) and Gliene do due (3rd person m. and f. sg., clitic form II.) with Ne do loro due (3rd person m. and f. pl.).
↑ In spoken Italian, gli ("to him") and glie- ("to him/her") are often used as the plural ("to them") instead of classical loro. So: Conosci Luca: gli ho sempre detto di stare lontano dalle cattive compagnie ("You know Luca: I have always told him to stay away from bad companies") and: Conosci Luca e Gino: gli ho sempre detto... ("...I have always told them...") instead of ... ho sempre detto loro di stare.... It also works in the feminine: Conosci Lucia e Gina: gli ho sempre detto... instead of the more classical ... ho detto loro.... However, classical loro is normally never replaced with gli/glie- in written language.
↑ Che and cui can always be replaced with the pro-form il quale / la quale (gendered), which is always stressed.
1 2 3 Differently from personal pronouns, clitic forms of relative pronouns do not rely on the verb for their accent, but might use the accent of any other part of speech instead. Compare ne ho studiato a fondo le parti più rilevanti ("I have studied the most relevant parts of it in depth"), where ne (personal pronoun, genitive) must rely on the verb ho for its accent, with le cui parti più rilevanti ho studiato a fondo ("whose most relevant parts I have studied in depth"), where cui (relative pronoun, genitive) relies on the noun parti for its accent.
↑ Always positioned between the article and the noun, as in Ieri lì sedeva un uomo il cui sguardo rivelava una certa malinconia. ("Yesterday a man was sitting there, whose look revealed some sort of melancholia"), or Fu un virtuosissimo violinista, la cui fama ancora riecheggia tra le sale da concerto. ("He was a virtuoso violinist, whose fame still echoes among concert halls.")
1 2 Cui (by itself) also acts as the prepositional object (as in per cui). Note that as the prepositional object cui is always stressed.
↑ Example: L'unica persona cui confessai tutti i miei segreti adesso mi odia. ("The only person to whom I confessed all my secrets now hates me.")
↑ As in c'è, vi sono ("There is/are), Ce l'ha messo ("He/she put it there), etc.
↑ As in Ne sono uscito alle... ("I left (from) there at...")
Clitic pronouns
Although objects come after the verb as a rule, this is often not the case with a class of unstressed cliticpro-forms.
Clitic pronouns are replaced with the stressed form for emphatic reasons. A somewhat similar situation is represented by the dative shift in English ditransitive verbs. Compare, for example, (emphasis in italic) "John gave a book to her" with "John gave hera book". In Italian these two different emphases map respectively to "John diede un libro a lei" (stressed form) and "John le diede un libro" (clitic form). Compared to English, Italian presents a richer set of cases.
Clitic pronouns generally come before the verb, but in certain types of constructions, such as lo devo fare, they can also appear as enclitics (attached to the verb itself)—in this case, devo farlo. In the infinitive, gerund and, except with third-person courtesy forms, imperative moods clitic pronouns must always be compound to the suffix as enclitics[12] (as in confessalo! [2p. sg.]/confessiamolo! [1p. pl.]/confessatelo! [2p. pl.], ricordandolo and mangiarlo).
Sì! Lo conosco! Una volta ci giocai a pallacanestro!
Yes! I know him! Long ago I played basketball with him!
Other examples:
accusative
Davide la lascia in ufficio.
(David leaves it in the office.)
dative + accusative + nominative
Davide mela lascia.
(David leaves meit.)
Davide tene lascia una.
(David leaves (to) you one of them.)
accusative + nominative + dative
Davide la lascia a me.
(David leaves itto me.)
Davide ne lascia una a te.
(David leaves one of them(to) you.)
(subjunctive +) infinitive + dative + accusative
Davide potrebbe lasciargliene una.
(David might leave one of themto him/her/it.)
dative + accusative + subjunctive (+ infinitive)
Davide gliene potrebbe lasciare una.
(David might leave one of themto him/her/it.)
(Compare with the similar use of objective pronouns and pro-forms in French and Catalan.)
Finally, in the imperative mood, the objective pronouns come once again after the verb, but this time as a suffix:
imperative + accusative
"Lasciala in ufficio!"
("Leave it in the office!")
imperative + dative + accusative
"Lasciamela!"
("Leave itto me!"/"Leave meit!")
(conditional +) infinitive + dative
"Davide potrebbe lasciarla in ufficio."
(David might leave it in the office.)
negative imperative + dative + accusative
"Non lasciargliela!"
("Do not leave itto/for him/her/it/them!")
imperative + dative + accusative
"Davide dovrebbe lasciargliela."
("David should leave itto/for him/her/it/them.")
Stressed forms of all four non-subject cases are used when emphasized (e.g. uccidi me, non lui ("kill me, not him"), dallo a lei ("give it to her"), lo farò con lui ("I'll do it with that"), etc.).
In colloquial speech, form I. of the dative (mi, ti, gli, le, si, ci, vi) is often associated with the emphasized form of the dative (a me, a te, a lui, a lei, a sé, a noi, a voi, a loro) in such a way: a me mi danno un libro ("they give me a book"), a loro gli hanno venduto una casa ("they sold them a house"). Although widely used, this redundant usage is considered non-standard.
Combinations of clitics
In Italian it is possible to append more than one clitic to a single verb. In normal usage, two is the usual limit, although clusters of three can occasionally arise for some speakers,[13] especially with impersonal constructs (e.g. Ce la si sente = "One feels up to it", or Nessuno ha ancora visto l'ultimo film di Woody Allen, quindi ce lo si vede tutti insieme! = "Nobody has watched the last Woody Allen movie yet, so we have to watch it together!"). Any two cases can be used together, except for accusative + genitive, and word order is strictly determined according to one of the following two patterns:[14]
When third-person non-reflexive accusative or genitive clitics are used, form II. of the other clitic is used, which always precedes it. Thus:
↑ Impersonal si; used to form quasi-passive constructions and essentially the same case as the pronoun that precedes it: Lo si vede spesso = "You/we/one see(s) him a lot" (lit. more like "He is seen a lot"). Se is used with ne instead, however: Se ne parla = "You talk about it". Cannot be used with stressed form of other clitics; used with unstressed form otherwise (see below).
For example:
Ve lo dico già da ora: io non verrò! = "I already told you [pl.] (said it to you): I'm not coming!" (dative + accusative)
Ce li ha già dati = "He/she/you already gave them to us" (dative + accusative)
Ecco l'uomo di cui mi innamorai! Te ne ho portato la foto! = "Here's the man I fell in love with! I brought you the picture (of him)!" (dative + genitive)
Vedresti Carla con una gonna lunga e un cappello? – Sì, ce la vedrei = "Could you imagine Carla with a long skirt and a hat? – Yes, I could imagine her with that" (instrumental + accusative)
Riuscirai a trasportare abbastanza mele con quel piccolo furgoncino? – Uomo di poca fede! Ce ne trasporterò quintali! = "Will you be able to transport enough apples with such a small van? – Man of little faith! I'll transport quintals of them (with it)!" (instrumental + genitive)
Mi ti mostro senza veli = "I'm showing myself without veils to you" (accusative + dative)
Ti si fece incontro = "He/she approached you (moved himself/herself to you)" (dative + accusative)
[G]li ti darò nelle mani, perché in pezzi ti faccia come tu meriti[15] = "I will deliver you to him, so that he will tear you to pieces as you deserve" (dative + accusative)
Marco ha vinto! Che farà con tutti quei soldi? – Ci si pagherà l'Università = "Marco won! What's he going to do with all that money? – He'll use it to pay for college (pay for college for himself with it)" (instrumental + dative)
Metti via quella pistola! Ti ci ammazzi! = "Put away that pistol! You'll use it to kill yourself (kill yourself with it)!" (accusative + instrumental)
Apocopated forms
Clitic forms (except cui) before a verbal form beginning with a vowel (except when they are compound to the suffix) can be apocopated; apocopations are more common before verbal forms è, ho, hai, ha, hanno, abbia, and abbiano of verbs essere and avere, than when they are before verbal forms of other verbs, which are more rare, also apocopations of che are rare, while apocopation of cui is avoided due to phonetic ambiguities with words such as qua (homophone to cu'ha). Apocopation is not mandatory. Ci is graphically apocopated only in front of "e" and "i" (as in c'è and c'inserisco), but the "i" is graphically kept in front of other vowels (as in mi ci addentro), although in all cases it is pronounced /t͡ʃ/ (without the "i"); similarly gli is graphically apocopated only in front of "i" (as in gl'impongo) but not in front of other vowels (gli è dato sapere), although in all cases the "i" is never pronounced. The apocopated form of che is always pronounced /k/, even when otherwise common phonetic rules switch their pronunciations.[16]
1 2 apocopated of reflexive pronouns with verbal forms of verb avere (ho, hai, ...) are rarely used.
T–V distinction
Italian makes use of the T–V distinction in second-person address. The second-person nominative pronoun is tu for informal use, and for formal use, the third-person form Lei (and historically Ella) has been used since the Renaissance.[6][17] It is used like Sie in German, usted in Spanish, and vous in French. Lei was originally an object form of ella, which in turn referred to an honorific of the feminine gender such as la magnificenza tua/vostra ('Your Magnificence') or Vossignoria ('Your Lordship'),[18] and by analogy, Loro came to be used as the formal plural. Previously, and in some Italian regions today (e.g. Campania), voi was used as the formal singular, like French vous. The pronouns lei (third-person singular), Lei (formal second-person singular), loro (third-person plural), and Loro (formal second-person plural) are pronounced the same but written as shown, and formal Lei and Loro take third-person conjugations. Formal Lei is invariable for gender (always feminine), but adjectives that modify it are not: one would say to a man La conosco ('I know you') but Lei è alto ('You are tall'). Formal Loro is variable for gender: Li conosco ('I know you [masc. pl.]') vs. Le conosco ('I know you [fem. pl.]'), etc. The formal plural is very rarely used in modern Italian; the unmarked form is widely used instead.[19] For example: Gino, Lei è un bravo ingegnere. Marco, Lei è un bravo architetto. Insieme, voi sarete una gran bella squadra. ("Gino, you are a good engineer. Marco, you are a good architect. Together, you will make a very good team.").
Based on the ending of their infiniti presenti (-are, -ere, or -ire), all Italian verbs can be assigned to three distinct conjugation patterns. Exceptions are found: fare, 'to do/make' (from Latin FACĔRE) "Conjugation of the verb fare". (Lingua-Italiana.IT)., and dire, 'to say' (from Latin DICĔRE) "Conjugation of the verb dire". (Lingua-Italiana.IT)., were originally 2nd conjugation verbs that reduced the unstressed vowel in the infinitive (and consequentially in the future and conditional, whose stem derives from the infinitive), but still follow the 2nd conjugation for all the other tenses; this behaviour is similarly featured in the verbs ending in -trarre, -porre and -durre, derived respectively from the Latin TRAHĔRE ('to drag') "Conjugation of the verb trarre". (Lingua-Italiana.IT)., PONĔRE ('to put') "Conjugation of the verb porre". (Lingua-Italiana.IT). and DVCĔRE ('to lead') "Conjugation of the verb addurre". (Lingua-Italiana.IT)..[20]
Just like many other Romance languages, Italian verbs express distinct verbal aspects by means of analytic structures such as periphrases, rather than synthetic ones; the only aspectual distinction between two synthetic forms is the one between the imperfetto (habitual past tense) and the passato remoto (perfective past tense), although the latter is usually replaced in spoken language by the passato prossimo.
Aspects other than the habitual and the imperfective, such as the perfective, the progressive and the prospective, are rendered in Italian by a series of periphrastic structures that may or may not be perceived as different tenses by different speakers. Note the difference between:
Perfect aspect: io ho fatto ("I have done")
Progressive aspect: io sto facendo ("I'm doing")
Prospective aspect: io sto per fare ("I'm about to do")
1 2 3 4 While Italian features a series of periphrastic progressive tenses grammatically distinct from the unmarked forms, the present and past continuous are used less frequently than in English, and can generally be replaced with the respective simple forms. This cannot necessarily apply to all other progressive tenses.
↑ In northern Italy and in Sardinia, the preterite is usually perceived as formal, and in informal or everyday language is usually replaced by the present perfect (ho fatto); it is however regularly used in southern Italy, and also commonly found in both older and more recent literature.
1 2 The trapassato prossimo (recent pluperfect) and the more uncommon trapassato remoto (remote pluperfect), while separate tenses in Italian, translate the same English tense, the past perfect; the difference in usage between the two mirrors the one between the present perfect and the preterite.
The passive voice of transitive verbs is formed with essere in the perfective and prospective aspects, with venire in the progressive or habitual aspect, and with either essere or venire in the perfective aspects:
Il cancello è stato appena aperto. ("The gate has just been opened.")
Il cancello sta per essere aperto ("The gate is about to be opened.")
Il cancello sta venendo aperto in questo momento. ("The gate is being opened right now.")
Il cancello viene aperto ogni giorno. ("The gate is opened every day.")
Il cancello fu/venne aperto in fretta. ("The gate was quickly opened.")
For the perfect tenses of intransitive verbs a reliable rule cannot be given, although a useful rule of thumb is that if a verb's past participle can take on adjectival value, essere is used, otherwise avere.[21][22] Also, reflexive verbs and unaccusative verbs use essere (typically non-agentive verbs of motion and change of state, i.e. involuntary actions such as cadere ('to fall') or morire ('to die')).[citation needed]
The distinction between the two auxiliary verbs is important for the correct formation of the compound tenses and is essential to the agreement of the past participle. Some verbs, such as vivere ('to live'), may use both: Io ho vissuto ('I have lived') can alternatively be expressed as, Io sono vissuto.
Past participle
The past participle is used in Italian as both an adjective and to form many of the compound tenses of the language. There are regular endings for the past participle, based on the conjugation class (see below). There are, however, many irregular forms as not all verbs follow the pattern, particularly the -ere verbs. Some of the more common irregular past participles include: essere ('to be') → stato (same for stare); fare ('to do', 'to make') → fatto; dire ('to say, to tell') → detto; aprire ('to open') → aperto; chiedere ('to ask') → chiesto; chiudere ('to close') → chiuso; leggere ('to read') → letto; mettere ('to put') → messo; perdere ('to lose') → perso; prendere ('to take', 'to get') → preso; rispondere ('to answer') → risposto; scrivere ('to write') → scritto; vedere ('to see') → visto.
For the intransitive verbs taking essere, the past participle always agrees with the subject—that is, it follows the usual adjective agreement rules: egli è partito; ella è partita. This is also true for reflexive verbs, the impersonal si construction (which requires any adjectives that refer to it to be in the masculine plural: Si è sempre stanchi alla fine della giornata – One is always tired at the end of the day), and the passive voice, which also use essere (Queste mele sono state comprate da loro – These apples have been bought by them, against Essi hanno comprato queste mele – They bought these apples).[1]
The past participle when used with avere never changes to agree with the subject. It must agree with the object, although, in sentences where this is expressed by a third person clitic pronoun (e.g. Hai mangiato la mela? – Sì, l'ho mangiata (Have you eaten the apple? – Yes, I have eaten it)). When the object is expressed by a first or second person clitic pronoun instead, the agreement is optional: Maria! Ti ha chiamato / chiamata Giovanni? – No, non mi ha chiamato / chiamata (Maria! Has Giovanni called you? – No, he has not).
In all the other cases where the object is not expressed by a clitic pronoun, the agreement with the object is obsolescent in modern Italian (but still correct): La storia che avete raccontata (obsolete) / raccontato non mi convince (The story you told does not convince me); or compare Manzoni's Lucia aveva avute due buone ragioni[23] with the more modern Lucia aveva avuto due buone ragioni (Lucia had had two good reasons).
Tense relationship in subordinate sentences
Italian inherits consecutio temporum, a grammar rule from Latin that governs the relationship between the tenses in principal and subordinate clauses. Consecutio temporum has very rigid rules. These rules require the subjunctive tense in order to express contemporaneity, posteriority and anteriority in relation with the principal clause.
To express contemporaneity when the principal clause is in a simple tense (future, present, or simple past), the subordinate clause uses the present subjunctive, to express contemporaneity in the present.
Penso che Davide sia intelligente. I think David is smart.
When the principal clause has a past imperfect or perfect, the subordinate clause uses the imperfect subjunctive, expressing contemporaneity in the past.
Pensavo che Davide fosse intelligente. I thought David was smart.
To express anteriority when the principal clause is in a simple tense (future, or present or passato prossimo) the subordinate clause uses the past subjunctive.
Penso che Davide sia stato intelligente. I think David has been smart.
To express anteriority when the principal clause has a past imperfect or perfect, the subjunctive has to be pluperfect.
Pensavo che Davide fosse stato intelligente. I thought David had been smart.
To express posteriority the subordinate clause uses the future tense in the indicative mood, not the subjunctive, because the subjunctive has no future tense.
Penso che Davide sarà intelligente. I think David will be smart.
To express posteriority with respect to a past event, the subordinate clause uses the past conditional, whereas in other European languages (such as French, English, and Spanish) the present conditional is used.
Pensavo che Davide sarebbe stato intelligente. I thought that David would have been smart.
Regular conjugation
The infinitive of first conjugation verbs ends in -are, that of second conjugation verbs in -ere, and that of third conjugation verbs in -ire. In the following examples for different moods, the first conjugation verb is parlare ('to talk/speak'), the second conjugation verb is temere ('to fear') and the third conjugation verb is partire ('to leave/depart').
Indicative mood
Present
Preterite
Imperfect
Simple future
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
io
parlo
temo
parto
parlai
temetti; temei
partii
parlavo
temevo
partivo
parlerò
temerò
partirò
tu
parli
temi
parti
parlasti
temesti
partisti
parlavi
temevi
partivi
parlerai
temerai
partirai
egli, ella, esso/essa
parla
teme
parte
parlò
temette; temé
partì
parlava
temeva
partiva
parlerà
temerà
partirà
noi
parliamo
temiamo
partiamo
parlammo
tememmo
partimmo
parlavamo
temevamo
partivamo
parleremo
temeremo
partiremo
voi
parlate
temete
partite
parlaste
temeste
partiste
parlavate
temevate
partivate
parlerete
temerete
partirete
essi/esse
parlano
temono
partono
parlarono
temettero; temerono
partirono
parlavano
temevano
partivano
parleranno
temeranno
partiranno
Recent past = present of avere/essere + past participle
Remote pluperfect = preterite of avere/essere + past participle
Recent pluperfect = imperfect of avere/essere + past participle
Future perfect = simple future of avere/essere + past participle
Many third conjugation verbs insert an infix -sc- between the stem and the endings in the first, second, and third persons singular and third person plural of the present indicative and subjunctive, e.g., capire > capisco, capisci, capisce, capiamo, capite, capiscono (indicative) and capisca, capisca, capisca, capiamo, capiate, capiscano (subjunctive). This subgroup of third conjugation verbs is usually referred to as incoativi, because in Latin the original function of the suffix -sc- was to denote inchoative verbs, but this meaning is totally lost in modern Italian, where the suffix mostly serves a euphonic function.[6]
Subjunctive mood
The Italian subjunctive mood is used to indicate cases of desire, express doubt, make impersonal emotional statements, and to talk about impending events.
Present
Imperfect
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
io
parli
tema
parta
parlassi
temessi
partissi
tu
parli
tema
parta
parlassi
temessi
partissi
egli, ella, esso/essa
parli
tema
parta
parlasse
temesse
partisse
noi
parliamo
temiamo
partiamo
parlassimo
temessimo
partissimo
voi
parliate
temiate
partiate
parlaste
temeste
partiste
essi/esse
parlino
temano
partano
parlassero
temessero
partissero
Past = present of avere/essere + past participle
Past perfect = imperfect of avere/essere + past participle
Third conjugation verbs, such as capire, mentioned above insert -isc- in the first, second, and third persons singular and third person plural of the present.
Compound forms (past and past perfect) are made by adding the past participle (e.g. parlato) to the corresponding auxiliary form (as abbia) in the present and imperfect.
Conditional mood
Present
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
io
parlerei
temerei
partirei
tu
parleresti
temeresti
partiresti
egli, ella, esso/essa
parlerebbe
temerebbe
partirebbe
noi
parleremmo
temeremmo
partiremmo
voi
parlereste
temereste
partireste
essi/esse
parlerebbero
temerebbero
partirebbero
Past = conditional of avere/essere + past participle
As the table shows, verbs each take their own root from their class of verb: -are becomes -er-, -ere becomes -er-, and -ire becomes -ir-, the same roots as used in the future indicative tense. All verbs add the same ending to this root.
Some verbs do not follow this pattern, but take irregular roots, these include: Andare ('to go') ~ Andr-, Avere ('to have') ~ Avr-, Bere ('to drink') ~ Berr-, Dare ('to give') ~ Dar-, Dovere ('to have to') ~ Dovr-, Essere ('to be') ~ Sar-, Fare ('to make/do') ~ Far-, Godere ('to enjoy') ~ Godr-, Potere ('to be able to') ~ Potr-, Rimanere ('to remain') ~ Rimarr-, Sapere ('to know') ~ Sapr-, Sedere ('to sit') ~ Sedr-, Stare ('to be/feel') ~ Star-, Tenere ('to hold') ~ Terr-, Vedere ('to see') ~ Vedr-, Venire ('to come') ~ Verr-, Vivere ('to live') ~ Vivr-, Volere ('to want') ~ Vorr- etc.
The Italian conditional mood is a mood that refers to an action that is possible or probably, but is dependent upon a condition. Example:
Io andrei in spiaggia, ma fa troppo freddo.
("I would go to the beach, but it is too cold.")
It can be used in two tenses, the present, by conjugation of the appropriate verb, or the past, using the auxiliary conjugated in the conditional, with the past participle of the appropriate noun:
Mangerei un sacco adesso, se non stessi cercando di fare colpo su queste ragazze.
("I would eat a lot now, if I were not trying to impress these girls.")
Sarei andato in città, se avessi saputo che ci andavano loro.
("I would have gone to the city, if I had known that they were going.")
Many Italian speakers often use the imperfect instead of the conditional and subjunctive. Prescriptivists usually view this as incorrect, but it is frequent in colloquial speech and tolerated in all but high registers and in most writing:[24]
Se lo sapevo, andavo alla spiaggia
("If I had known it, I would have gone to the beach.")
Se Lucia non faceva quel segno, la risposta sarebbe probabilmente stata diversa.[25]
("If Lucia had not made that sign, the answer would probably have been different.")
The conditional can also be used in Italian to express "could", with the conjugated forms of potere ('to be able to'), "should", with the conjugated forms of dovere ('to have to'), or "would like", with the conjugated forms of volere ('want'):
[Lui] potrebbe leggere un libro.
("He could read a book.")
[Loro] dovrebbero andare a letto.
("They should go to bed.")
Vorrei un bicchiere d'acqua, per favore.
("I would like a glass of water, please.")
Imperative mood
1st Conj.
2nd Conj.
3rd Conj.
(tu)
parla!
temi!
parti!
(Ella)
parli!
tema!
parta!
(noi)
parliamo!
temiamo!
partiamo!
(voi)
parlate!
temete!
partite!
(Essi/Esse)
parlino!
temano!
partano!
Verbs such as capire insert -isc- in all except the noi and voi forms. Technically, the only real imperative forms are the second-person singular and plural, with the other persons being borrowed from the present subjunctive.
Non-finite forms
Infinitive: present: -are, -ere, -ire; past: avere/essere + past participle
Gerund: present: -ando, -endo, -endo; past: avendo/essendo + past participle
Participle: present: -ante -ente -ente; past: -ato, -uto (although verbs of the second conjugation almost always have a contracted desinence, e.g. cuocere ('to cook') cotto ('cooked')), -ito
Irregular verbs
While the majority of Italian verbs are regular, many of the most commonly used are irregular. In particular, the auxiliary verbsessere, stare and avere, and the common modal verbsdovere (expressing necessity or obligation), potere (expressing permission and to a lesser degree ability), sapere (expressing ability) and volere (expressing willingness) are all irregular.
The only irregular verbs of the first conjugation are dare ('to give'), which follows the same pattern as stare, and andare ('to go'), which features suppletive forms in the present of the indicative, subjunctive and imperative from the Latin verb VADERE. While apparently a 1st conjugation verb, fare is actually a highly irregular verb of the second conjugation. Even the third conjugation features a small handful of irregular verbs, such as morire ('to die'), whose present is muoio, muori, muore, moriamo, morite, muoiono (indicative) and muoia, muoia, muoia, moriamo, moriate, muoiano (subjunctive).
The second conjugation combines the second and third conjugation of Latin; since the verbs belonging to the third conjugation were athematic, and they behaved less regularly than the ones belonging to the other conjugations (compare AMĀRE > AMAVI, AMATVS, first conjugation, and LEGĚRE > LEGI, LECTVS, third conjugation), the second conjugation Italian features many irregularities that trace back to the original paradigms of the Latin verbs: amare > amai, amato (first conjugation, regular), but leggere > lessi, letto (second conjugation, irregular).
An adjective can be made into a modal adverb by adding -mente (from Latin mente, ablative of mens ('mind'), feminine noun) to the ending of the feminine singular form of the adjective. E.g. lenta, 'slow' (feminine), becomes lentamente, 'slowly'. Adjectives ending in -re or -le lose their e before adding -mente (facile, 'easy', becomes facilmente, 'easily'; particolare, 'particular', becomes particolarmente, 'particularly').
These adverbs can also be derived from the absolute superlative form of adjectives, e.g. lentissimamente ('very slowly'), facilissimamente ('very easily').
There is also a plethora of temporal, local, modal and interrogative adverbs, mostly derived from Latin, e.g. quando ('when'), dove ('where'), come ('how'), perché ('why/because'), mai ('never'), sempre ('always'), etc.
Prepositions
Italian has a closed class of basic prepositions, to which a number of adverbs can be added that also double as prepositions, e.g.: sopra il tavolo ('upon the table'), prima di adesso ('before now').
In modern Italian the prepositions tra and fra are interchangeable, and often chosen on the basis of euphony: tra fratelli ('among brothers') vs. fra i tralicci ('between the power pylons').
In modern Italian, all the basic prepositions except tra, fra, con and per have to be combined with an article placed next to them. Of these, con and per have optional combining forms: col, collo, colla, coll', coi, cogli, colle; pel, pello, pella, pell', pei, pegli, pelle; except for col and coi, which are occasionally used, however, these are archaic and very rare.
Prepositions normally require the article before the following noun in a similar way as the English language does. However Latin's lack of articles influenced several cases of prepositions used without article in Italian (e.g., a capo, da capo, di colpo, in bicicletta, per strada).
The preposition su becomes su di before a pronoun (e.g., su di te). Some speakers also use su di before a word beginning in u for euphonic reasons (e.g., su di un cavallo), but this is regarded as incorrect by grammarians. Historically the variant form sur was used before the letter u; however, this form fell into disuse during the nineteenth century.
Mandatory contractions
Italian
English
Preposition + article
il
lo
la
l'
i
gli
le
di
of, from
del
dello
della
dell'
dei
degli
delle
a
to, at
al
allo
alla
all'
ai
agli
alle
da
from, by, since
dal
dallo
dalla
dall'
dai
dagli
dalle
in
in
nel
nello
nella
nell'
nei
negli
nelle
su
on, about
sul
sullo
sulla
sull'
sui
sugli
sulle
Optional contractions
Italian
English
Preposition + article
il
lo
la
l'
i
gli
le
con
with
col
collo
colla
coll'
coi
cogli
colle
per
for, through
pel
pello
pella
pell'
pei
pegli
pelle
tra
between, among
tral
trallo
tralla
trall'
trai
tragli
tralle
fra
between, among
fral
frallo
fralla
frall'
frai
fragli
fralle
Syntax
Italian is an SVO language. Nevertheless, the SVO sequence is sometimes replaced by one of the other arrangements (SOV, VSO, OVS, etc.), especially for reasons of emphasis and, in literature, for reasons of style and metre: Italian has relatively free word order.
The subject is usually omitted when it is a pronoun—distinctive verb conjugations make it redundant. Subject pronouns are considered emphatic when used at all.
Questions are formed by a rising intonation at the end of the sentence (in written form, a question mark). There is usually no other special marker, although wh-movement does usually occur. In general, intonation and context are important to recognize questions from affirmative statements.
Davide è arrivato in ufficio.
("David has arrived at the office.")
Davide è arrivato in ufficio?
("Talking about David… did he arrive at the office?" or "Davide has arrived at the office? Really?" – depending on the intonation)
Perché Davide è arrivato in ufficio?
("Why has David arrived at the office?")
Perché Davide è arrivato in ufficio.
("Because David has arrived at the office.")
È arrivato Davide in ufficio.
("It was David who arrived at the office" or "David arrived at the office" – depending on the intonation)
È arrivato Davide in ufficio?
("Has David arrived at the office?")
È arrivato in ufficio.
("He has arrived at the office.")
(Lui) è arrivato in ufficio.
("He has arrived at the office.")
Chi è arrivato in ufficio?
("Who has arrived at the office?")
In general, adjectives come after the noun they modify, adverbs after the verb. But: as with French, adjectives coming before the noun indicate essential quality of the noun. Demonstratives (e.g. questo, 'this', quello, 'that') come before the noun, and a few particular adjectives (e.g. bello) may be inflected like demonstratives and placed before the noun.
Disputed points in Italian grammar
Among sometimes proscribed Italian forms are:
The usage of an indicative form where a subjunctive one is traditional; for instance: credo che Giorgio ieri fosse a casa ("I believe that yesterday George was at home") is considered proper, while credo che Giorgio ieri era a casa may not be; se Maria fosse stata a casa, le avrei telefonato ("if Mary had been at home, I would have telephoned her") is preferred, se Maria era a casa le telefonavo is often proscribed, despite being found in classic Italian writers.
The use of the object forms (lui, lei, loro and Lei) of third person pronouns instead of the subject forms (egli, ella, essi and Ella), which are employed in formal language.
Ma però, despite being widespread in spoken language, is proscribed in formal usage because it is redundant (ma and però are synonyms).
↑ This class emerged in 13th Century Old Italian. Presumably the plural ending changed to -i because these nouns were masculine. See Dynamics of Morphological Productivity by Francesco Gardani, p. 427.
↑ In Classical Latin, the word is neuter: templum / templa. However, in Vulgar Latin the neuter gender gradually eroded as more and more words migrated to the other genders. The earliest evidence for a masculine version of templum in Vulgar Latin comes from the Late Latin Codex Bezae (circa 400) where we read 'quiaegodestruamhunctemplum' where in the Vulgata we read 'Ego dissolvam templum hoc' (Evangelium secundum Marcum 14.58). The nominative singular is unattested, but judging from other attested neuter nouns turned masculine, it would presumably have been *templus. See An Introduction to Vulgar Latin by Charles Hall Grandgent, p. 145, and Itala und Vulgata by Hermann Rönsch, p. 266.
↑ This was not always the case, however. It is not rare indeed to find in operalibrettos the clitic before the imperative, as in Ti ferma! (which in standard Italian means 'He/She/It stops you!') instead of the standard Fermati! (which means 'Stop yourself!'). However this usage today is completely non-standard and modern listeners might have difficulties with it when approaching old texts.
↑ Lepschy, Giulio and Anna Laura Lepschy. 1998. The Italian Language Today. New York: New Amsterdam Books. p. 214.
↑ Lepschy, Giulio and Anna Laura Lepschy. 1998. The Italian Language Today. New York: New Amsterdam Books. p. 212.
↑ Giraldi, Giovanni Battista (1565). Gli Ecatommiti[The Moor of Venice]. Tipografia Borghi & Compagni (published 1833). p.1840.
↑ (with ho, hai, ha, hanno, and verbal forms beginning with "a", "o" or "u")
↑ Birattari, Massimo (2015). Italiano: Corso di Sopravvivenza. TEA. pp.131–134. ISBN88-50-23822-3.
↑ Maiden, Martin, M.Mair Parry. 1997. The dialects of Italy. p. 113.
↑ The verb sapere has two distinctive meanings depending whether it is used as a modal verb (i.e. accompanying another infinitive) or not. As a modal verb it means 'can, being able to', as in so suonare il violino ('I can play the violin'), while as a normal verb it means 'to know', as in so cosa significhi ('I know what that means').
Latin is a heavily inflected language with largely free word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case; pronouns and adjectives are inflected for number, case, and gender; and verbs are inflected for person, number, tense, aspect, voice, and mood. The inflections are often changes in the ending of a word, but can be more complicated, especially with verbs.
The morphology of Irish is in some respects typical of an Indo-European language. Nouns are declined for number and case, and verbs for person and number. Nouns are classified by masculine or feminine gender. Other aspects of Irish morphology, while typical for an Insular Celtic language, are not typical for Indo-European, such as the presence of inflected prepositions and the initial consonant mutations. Irish syntax is also rather different from that of most Indo-European languages, due to its use of the verb–subject–object word order.
In Portuguese grammar, nouns, adjectives, pronouns, and articles are moderately inflected: there are two genders and two numbers. The case system of the ancestor language, Latin, has been lost, but personal pronouns are still declined with three main types of forms: subject, object of verb, and object of preposition. Most nouns and many adjectives can take diminutive or augmentative derivational suffixes, and most adjectives can take a so-called "superlative" derivational suffix. Adjectives usually follow their respective nouns.
Swedish is descended from Old Norse. Compared to its progenitor, Swedish grammar is much less characterized by inflection. Modern Swedish has two genders and no longer conjugates verbs based on person or number. Its nouns have lost the morphological distinction between nominative and accusative cases that denoted grammatical subject and object in Old Norse in favor of marking by word order. Swedish uses some inflection with nouns, adjectives, and verbs. It is generally a subject–verb–object (SVO) language with V2 word order.
In French grammar, verbs are a part of speech. Each verb lexeme has a collection of finite and non-finite forms in its conjugation scheme.
In linguistics, agreement or concord occurs when a word changes form depending on the other words to which it relates. It is an instance of inflection, and usually involves making the value of some grammatical category "agree" between varied words or parts of the sentence.
The grammar of the Polish language is complex and characterized by a high degree of inflection, and has relatively free word order, although the dominant arrangement is subject–verb–object (SVO). There commonly are no articles, and there is frequent dropping of subject pronouns. Distinctive features include the different treatment of masculine personal nouns in the plural, and the complex grammar of numerals and quantifiers.
The grammar of Modern Greek, as spoken in present-day Greece and Cyprus, is essentially that of Demotic Greek, but it has also assimilated certain elements of Katharevousa, the archaic, learned variety of Greek imitating Classical Greek forms, which used to be the official language of Greece through much of the 19th and 20th centuries. Modern Greek grammar has preserved many features of Ancient Greek, but has also undergone changes in a similar direction as many other modern Indo-European languages, from more synthetic to more analytic structures.
Eastern Lombard grammar reflects the main features of Romance languages: the word order of Eastern Lombard is usually SVO, nouns are inflected in number, adjectives agree in number and gender with the nouns, verbs are conjugated in tenses, aspects and moods and agree with the subject in number and person. The case system is present only for the weak form of the pronoun.
Icelandic grammar is the set of structural rules that describe the use of the Icelandic language.
In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, while the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, etc. can be called declension.
Bolognese is a dialect of Emilian spoken in the most part in the city of Bologna and its hinterland, but also in the district of Castelfranco Emilia in the province of Modena, and in the towns of Sambuca Pistoiese (Tuscany), Cento, Sant'Agostino, and Poggio Renatico.
This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.
Old Norse has three categories of verbs and two categories of nouns. Conjugation and declension are carried out by a mix of inflection and two nonconcatenative morphological processes: umlaut, a backness-based alteration to the root vowel; and ablaut, a replacement of the root vowel, in verbs.
Italian verbs have a high degree of inflection, the majority of which follows one of three common patterns of conjugation. Italian conjugation is affected by mood, person, tense, number, aspect and occasionally gender.
Portuguese verbs display a high degree of inflection. A typical regular verb has over fifty different forms, expressing up to six different grammatical tenses and three moods. Two forms are peculiar to Portuguese within the Romance languages:
The morphology of the Polish language is characterised by a fairly regular system of inflection as well as word formation. Certain regular or common alternations apply across the Polish morphological system, affecting word formation and inflection of various parts of speech. These are described below, mostly with reference to the orthographic rather than the phonological system for clarity.
This article concerns the morphology of the Albanian language, including the declension of nouns and adjectives, and the conjugation of verbs. It refers to the Tosk-based Albanian standard regulated by the Academy of Sciences of Albania.
The grammar of Old Saxon is highly inflected, similar to that of Old English or Latin. As an ancient Germanic language, the morphological system of Old Saxon is similar to that of the hypothetical Proto-Germanic reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in Proto-Indo-European and also including characteristically Germanic constructions such as the umlaut. Among living languages, Old Saxon morphology most closely resembles that of modern High German.
Romance linguistics is the scientific study of the Romance languages.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
