![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
All 31 seats in the Texas Senate 16 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Democratic hold Democratic gain Republican hold Republican gain Democratic: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% ≥90% Republican: 50–60% 80–90% ≥90% | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Texas |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
The 1982 Texas Senate elections took place as part of the biennial United States elections. Texas voters elected state senators in all 31 State Senate districts. The winners of this election served in the 68th Texas Legislature, serving staggered terms, with half of them up for election in 1984 and the other half up in 1986.
Democrats had controlled the Texas Senate since the 1872 elections. [1] The Legislature passed redistricting bills in 1981, but Republican governor Bill Clements vetoed the state Senate map. The Legislative Redistricting Board, made up entirely of Democrats, was then tasked with drawing the map for the chamber. Despite this partisan unanimity, stark divisions came about on the Board due to each member's own goals, ranging from incumbency protection to the expansion of minority representation. Several members' potential gubernatorial ambitions also underscored the debate. The Board eventually passed a map in a 4–1 vote, with Comptroller Bob Bullock dissenting. [2]
State office | 1981 board member |
---|---|
Lieutenant governor | William P. Hobby Jr. (D) |
Speaker of the House | Bill W. Clayton (D) |
Attorney general | Mark White (D) |
Comptroller | Bob Bullock (D) [a] |
Land commissioner | Bob Armstrong (D) |
The Senate map passed by the Board was challenged by a lawsuit in Terrazas v. Clements. [3] Additionally, the Justice Department blocked both maps for violating the Voting Rights Act. These challenges were primarily focused on the map's alleged dilution of Hispanic representation. [4] The map maintained the presence of two districts, one in Houston and the other in Dallas, with substantial African American populations, as required by previous court rulings. [5] Given the imminence of the March primary, and a failed appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the courts allowed the map to be used for the 1982 elections. [6]
Democrats expanded their supermajority, winning twenty six seats, a gain of two from the 1980 elections. The Republican Party had been on a resurgence in the past decade, winning the governorship for the first time since Reconstruction in 1978 and reaching a high mark in the 1980 elections amid the Reagan Revolution. A lagging economy and high urban turnout lead to an underwhelming result in 1982, however, with Republicans losing the governorship and ground in the legislature. [7] Of the two predominantly African American districts, District 13 in Houston elected Black Democrat Craig Washington, while District 23 in Dallas re-elected White Democrat Oscar Mauzy. [5]
District | Democratic | Republican | Others | Total | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | ||
District 1 | 81,096 | 96.57% | - | - | 2,877 | 3.43% | 83,973 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 2 | 63,561 | 59.22% | 43,168 | 40.22% | 610 | 0.57% | 107,339 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 3 | 83,626 | 95.12% | - | - | 4,291 | 4.88% | 87,917 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 4 | 80,242 | 92.16% | - | - | 6,829 | 7.84% | 87,071 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 5 | 81,207 | 94.65% | - | - | 4,591 | 5.35% | 85,798 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 6 | 44,054 | 89.04% | - | - | 5,422 | 10.96% | 49,476 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 7 | - | - | 83,920 | 94.01% | 5,346 | 5.99% | 89,266 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 8 | - | - | 90,911 | 86.92% | 13,686 | 13.08% | 104,597 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 9 | 85,613 | 95.72% | - | - | 3,825 | 4.28% | 89,438 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 10 | - | - | 64,318 | 89.96% | 7,180 | 10.04% | 71,498 | 100.00% | Republican gain |
District 11 | 56,348 | 68.20% | 26,278 | 31.80% | - | - | 82,626 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 12 | 82,626 | 54.62% | 47,259 | 44.00% | 1,480 | 1.38% | 107,406 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 13 | 69,567 | 90.62% | - | - | 7,202 | 9.38% | 76,769 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 14 | 96,147 | 71.87% | 37,627 | 28.13% | - | - | 133,774 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 15 | 51,409 | 62.26% | 29,198 | 35.36% | 1,965 | 2.38% | 82,572 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 16 | 38,669 | 38.29% | 60,046 | 59.46% | 2,265 | 2.24% | 100,980 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 17 | - | - | 64,331 | 86.88% | 9,713 | 13.12% | 74,044 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 18 | 67,563 | 66.75% | 32,298 | 31.91% | 1,350 | 1.33% | 101,211 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 19 | 49,812 | 65.28% | 26,498 | 34.72% | - | - | 76,310 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 20 | 69,218 | 85.88% | - | - | 11,385 | 14.12% | 80,603 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 21 | - | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | - | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 22 | 77,184 | 68.39% | 34,569 | 30.63% | 1,101 | 0.98% | 112,854 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 23 | 63,757 | 79.21% | 15,579 | 19.35% | 1,155 | 1.43% | 80,491 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 24 | - | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | - | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 25 | 57,522 | 51.82% | 52,868 | 47.63% | 610 | 0.55% | 111,000 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 26 | 57,368 | 88.76% | - | - | 7,265 | 11.24% | 64,633 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 27 | - | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | - | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 28 | 62,642 | 62.44% | 36,511 | 36.39% | 1,168 | 1.16% | 100,321 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 29 | 100,321 | 80.39% | - | - | 12,182 | 19.61% | 62,119 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 30 | 89,308 | 95.36% | - | - | 4,344 | 4.64% | 93,652 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 31 | 81,030 | 73.28% | 28,259 | 25.56% | 1,290 | 1.17% | 110,579 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
Total | – | – | 773,638 | – | 119,132 | – | – | 100.00% | Source: [8] |