![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 31 seats in the Texas Senate 16 seats needed for a majority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Senate results by district Democratic hold Democratic gain Republican hold Republican gain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Texas |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
The 1994 Texas Senate elections took place as part of the biennial United States elections. Texas voters elected state senators in all 31 State Senate districts due to redistricting. Half of the seats were elected for two-year terms and the other half were elected for four-year terms. The winners of this election served in the 74th Texas Legislature. This was the last election in which Democrats won a majority in the Senate.
Democrats had controlled the Texas Senate since the 1872 elections. The 1992 elections had been held under lines drawn by federal courts, which had overturned the maps passed by the legislature as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. [1] Democrats had tried to pass their own maps for the courts to allow in a January 1992 special session, but the courts rejected these maps and imposed their own. [2] [3] Democrats took issue with the presence of Judge James Robertson Nowlin on the panel. Nowlin was a former Republican state representative who had taken part in the controversial 1981 redistricting. Nowlin would later admit to being in contact with multiple Republican House members concerning the districts the courts were drawing. Democrats sought Nowlin's recusal from the case because of this, but the plans had already been enacted by the time this had occurred. [4]
The court-imposed maps were seen as highly favorable to Republicans, and they believed they had the opportunity to win the chamber for the first time sine Reconstruction under them. [5] [6] Republicans made substantial gains in the 1992 elections, gaining four seats from the Democrats, but they failed to win control. [7] With Judge Nowlin no longer on the federal panel, the 1994 elections were allowed to be held under the lines passed by the legislature in the January 1992 special session. Despite the more favorable maps, the political damage had already been done to the Democrats, as many of the incumbents their map was designed to protect had already lost re-election in 1992. [4] Because the 1994 map was completely different from the 1992 map, all senators were required to run for re-election, instead of only half of them. [8]
Republicans made mild gains, winning 14 seats to the Democrats' 17, but they failed to take control of the chamber, even amidst the Republican Revolution which saw the election of George W. Bush to the governorship and Republicans winning majorities on the Supreme Court, Board of Education, and Railroad Commission. [9]
District | Democratic | Republican | Others | Total | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | ||
District 1 | 55,616 | 35.46% | 101,207 | 64.54% | - | - | 156,823 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 2 | 61,757 | 50.59% | 60,317 | 49.41% | - | - | 122,074 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 3 | 76,245 | 47.65% | 83,779 | 52.35% | - | - | 160,024 | 100.00% | Republican gain |
District 4 | 71,012 | 47.26% | 79,252 | 52.74% | - | - | 150,264 | 100.00% | Republican gain |
District 5 | 82,541 | 55.99% | 64,875 | 44.01% | - | - | 147,416 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 6 | 38,759 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 38,759 | 100.00% | Democratic gain |
District 7 | - | - | 143,628 | 100.00% | - | - | 143,628 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 8 | - | - | 156,014 | 90.23% | 16,889 | 9.77% | 172,903 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 9 | - | - | 127,623 | 100.00% | - | - | 127,623 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 10 | - | - | 129,343 | 100.00% | - | - | 129,343 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 11 | 59,047 | 44.39% | 73,959 | 55.61% | - | - | 133,006 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 12 | 94,707 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 94,707 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 13 | 89,832 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 89,832 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 14 | 135,979 | 83.02% | - | - | 27,820 | 16.98% | 163,799 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 15 | 66,341 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 66,341 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 16 | - | - | 108,229 | 64.07% | 16,026 | 12.90% | 124,255 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 17 | 44,465 | 27.42% | 117,727 | 72.58% | - | - | 162,192 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 18 | 98,066 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 98,066 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 19 | 60,422 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 60,422 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 20 | 67,066 | 58.44% | 47,686 | 41.56% | - | - | 114,752 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 21 | 71,029 | 68.53% | 32,624 | 31.47% | - | - | 103,653 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 22 | 58,544 | 41.34% | 83,064 | 58.66% | - | - | 141,608 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 23 | 79,157 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 79,157 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 24 | 67,536 | 53.35% | 59,048 | 46.65% | - | - | 126,584 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 25 | 53,152 | 24.97% | 159,729 | 75.03% | - | - | 212,881 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
District 26 | 55,799 | 63.28% | 32,375 | 36.72% | - | - | 88,174 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 27 | 53,194 | 66.73% | 26,527 | 33.27% | - | - | 79,721 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 28 | 78,676 | 64.21% | 43,854 | 35.79% | - | - | 122,530 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 29 | 64,207 | 100.00% | - | - | - | - | 64,207 | 100.00% | Democratic hold |
District 30 | 73,964 | 48.79% | 77,626 | 51.21% | - | - | 151,590 | 100.00% | Republican gain |
District 31 | - | - | 115,951 | 100.00% | - | - | 115,951 | 100.00% | Republican hold |
Total | 1,757,113 | 46.95% | 1,924,437 | 51.42% | 60,735 | 1.62% | 3,742,285 | 100.00% | Source: [10] |
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)