Gender-critical feminism by country

Last updated

Gender-critical feminism, also known as trans-exclusionary radical feminism or TERFism, [1] [2] [3] [4] is an ideology or movement that opposes what it refers to as "gender ideology". [5] Gender-critical feminists believe that sex is biological, immutable, and binary, and consider the concepts of gender identity and gender self-identification to be inherently oppressive constructs tied to gender roles. [6] [7] They reject transgender and non-binary identities, and view trans women as men and trans men as women. [8]

Contents

Originating as a fringe movement within radical feminism mainly in the United States, [4] [9] [10] trans-exclusionary radical feminism has achieved prominence in the United Kingdom [11] and South Korea, [12] [13] where it has been at the centre of high-profile controversies. It has been linked to promotion of disinformation [14] [15] [16] and to the anti-gender movement. [17] Anti-gender rhetoric has seen increasing circulation in gender-critical feminist discourse since 2016, including use of the term "gender ideology". [5] In several countries, gender-critical feminist groups have formed alliances with right-wing, far-right, and anti-feminist organisations. [18] [19] [20] [21]

Americas

Brazil

On 1 October 2025, the Brazilian National Women's Conference voted on a motion to repudiate anti-gender and trans-exclusive movements, with 95% of attendees voting in favor. The motion condemned trans-exclusionary groups MATRIA, LGB Alliance, and Raízes Feministas. [22]

Canada

In April 2025 Nurse Amy Hamm was found to have committed unprofessional conduct by the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives, following lengthy proceedings. [23] She is appealing to the British Columbia Supreme Court. [23] Online comments made by the nurse between July 2018 and March 2021 were considered "discriminatory and derogatory statements" about transgender people. Hamm said she was not transphobic, but worried for the rights of women and girls. [23] In August 2025, she was suspended by the college and asked to pay nearly $94,000 in fees. [24]

Mexico

According to researchers Siobhan Guerrero McManus and Julianna Stone Neuhouser, gender-critical feminism rose to prominence in Mexico in 2017 following the publication of the essay "Cuando lo trans no es transgresor". They identified two trends in Mexican culture that contributed to the rise of gender-critical feminism: the rise of fourth-wave feminism in Mexico and the Frente Nacional por la Familia's declared opposition to "gender ideology". [25]

United States

Although gender-critical feminism originated in the United States in the 1970s, it has largely fallen out of favor among American feminists. [26] Some gender-critical organizations do remain, however, such as WoLF, a gender-critical feminist organization that operates mainly within the United States. [26]

Europe

France

In France, the gender-critical or TERF strain of feminism was long understood as less significant or dangerous to trans rights than non-feminist, conservative or religious groups. Journalist Yacha Hajzler described the strain as an extremist minority supported by the political far-right, [27] while Constance Lefebvre dismissed TERFs as a small uninfluential minority of French feminists. [28] However, in the years leading up to 2022, TERFs gained increasing prominence in public discourse. [28] Roux Ange argues that French anti-trans feminism in particular advances a "universalist feminism" that collapses intersectionality. [29]

The French gender-critical feminist movement is closely linked with conservative and far-right movements. [30] Trans-exclusionary feminists Margeruite Stern and Dora Motout  [ fr ] amplify and support anti-trans lobby groups Little Mermaid Observatory  [ fr ] and Ypomoni  [ fr ]. [30] Founded in 2021, Little Mermaid Observatory was established by Céline Masson and Caroline Eliacheff to lobby against transgender healthcare for minors. [31] [32] [33]

In 2019, feminist activist Stern, launched a series of collages or posters, sometimes known as the feminist collages  [ fr ] movement, that denounce sexist violence. [34] [35] On 22 January 2020, she sparked controversy with her statements in a Twitter thread that trans women were "taking up more and more space in feminism", culminating in her leaving the group of activists and ostracizing her from the broader movement. [34] [36] This controversy led journalists Flavie Motila, Lisa Peyronne and Marielle Poupard to describe Stern as taking the "tête" (lead) of the TERF movement. [37]

On 12 February 2020, a statement authored by journalist Pauline Arrighi was published in Le Huffpost titled "Trans Question". [35] It was signed by 60 people, including Stern, and questioned whether trans women should be able to identify as women. [38] Following protests, the publication removed the statement after only a few hours and apologized that the statement contained comments that went against the values of the publication. [34] The piece was later republished in Marianne with the title "Trans: Is It Enough to Self-Claim as a Woman To Demand To Be Recognized as One?" and garnered over 140 signatories, including sociologist Christine Delphy. [35]

As a rejoinder to Stern's thread and the tribune republished in Marianne, a group of transfeminist authors penned a piece titled "The Debate on the Place of Transfemmes Is Pointless". [35] [39] The piece reaffirmed the importance of solidarity with trans women in the feminist movement and showed how purported 'legitimate concerns' give rise to violent depictions of trans people, and was signed by 1014 individuals and 113 organizations. [35] [39]

Another site of dispute was over NGO Planning Familial  [ fr ]'s publicity campaign including a cartoon of a pregnant transgender man. [40] Far-right activists first targeted the author of the cartoon on social media, prompting Minister of Equality Isabelle Rome to speak out in the organization's defense. [41] Marguerite Stern and Dora Motout wrote an opinion column in Marianne addressed to prime minister Élisabeth Borne warning of an 'ideological drift' of Planning Familial. [30] As a result, the pair met Aurore Bergé, president of the majority party La République En Marche, who praised their arguments. [30] Following this meeting, Bergé introduced an amendment to a proposed law to guarantee the right to abortion that would exclude transgender men from accessing this right, which was swiftly criticized by LGBTQI+ associations and described as transphobic. [42]

On 6 January 2023, [43] [44] Stern and Motout launched a website femelliste.com, containing their "Femelliste Manifesto". [45] It aims to highlight "sexed realities" and the rights of "original and authentic women", concluding that trans women must be removed from the category of womanhood. [35] CJ Gomolka describes this particular brand of gender-critical feminism, sometimes described as "femellisme", [46] as revanchist and a type of "femonationalism". [35] [47] French philosopher Camille Froidevaux-Metterie argues the term "femellisme" is a label invented by the media to give legitimacy to a political stance based in trans hatred. [46] Stern and Motout have been connected with ultra-conservative groups, conspiracy theorists and the far-right. [30]

This contingent of trans-exclusionary feminists in France highlight one area of contention as freedom of expression and speech. In August 2022, Dora Motout attacked journalist Hanneli Escurier in an Instagram post. [27] In October 2022, Motout referred to trans mayor Marie Cau as a "transfeminine man" on journalist Léa Salamé's television program. [48] In early 2023, associations Mousse and Stop Homophobie, filed a complaint against Motout for incitement to hatred, [44] which Cau later joined. [27] In defense of her actions in a piece for Unherd, Motout argues that French feminism has corrupted and that her and other are "fighting for freedom of expression". [49] A group of 30 figures published an opinion piece in Marianne denouncing the complaint, arguing that it constitutes a threat to freedom of expression. [50]

Germany

Since 2021, a TERF or gender-critical feminist discourse has developed as an alternative to mainstream feminism in response to the coalition government introducing self-ID legislation. [51] [52] This minority of feminists invokes language of 'biological sex', social contagion and misinformation about transgender violence, citing experiences in the United Kingdom. [51] [53]

The law governing transgender legal recognition in Germany is the Transsexuals Act (TSG), passed in 1980. It has been amended for unconstitutionality and has been the subject of significant criticism from German political society. [52] Due to these issues, the German government aimed to write a new law to replace the TSG, culminating in the proposal of the Self-Determination Act (Selbstbestimmungsgesetz or SPG), published on 30 June 2022. [52] The law was aimed at removing unnecessary bureaucratic requirements for transgender people to change their legal gender in the previous law such as expert assessments and humiliating questionnaires. [54] It was supported by the German Women's Organizations (DF), the main women's organization in Germany that represents over 60 women's associations and groups, [55] and came into effect on 1 November 2024. [56] [57]

However prior to passing, the proposed law was the subject of significant public discourse on its merits, with the most prominent opposition stemming from right-wing actors and gender-critical feminists. Concordant with other hashtag campaigns, #FrauenSagenNein emerged in online German discourse as a way for women to express opposition to the law. [52] In a network analysis of the hashtag, researchers Zahn and Lünenborg identified an alliance between gender-critical feminists and right-wing activists opposing the law. [52]

Alice Schwarzer, German journalist and editor of the feminist magazine Emma , published a book Transsexualität (2022) arguing that a 'trans lobby' was causing young people to falsely see transitioning as a solution to their problems. [51] [58] Schwarzer explicitly invokes the English context of the debate over trans rights, warning that dangers from trans women and academic shifts she claims occurred in the UK might happen in Germany as well. [51] Since 2021, Emma has increasingly focused on transgender issues. [59] The magazine published a series of articles throughout 2022 that advance an exclusionary understanding of womanhood, treating trans identity as a social trend. [53] Amongst invocations of 'social infection' of transgender children, these articles have been described as transphobic and cite disinformation campaigns from the British tabloid Daily Mirror . [53] [59]

One women's rights organization, Terre des Femmes, published a position paper in 2020 titled "Transgender, Self-Determination, and Gender", arguing for the primacy of 'biological sex' over gender and emphasizing the organization's focus on the discrimination against "women and girls". [60] In July 2022, the organization's board voted to withdraw the document, citing damage to the group's reputation and the fact that paper strayed from their inclusive values. [60] [61] In 2023, the minority trans-exclusionary faction led by Inge Bell split from the organization, claiming that the organization had succumbed to identity politics. [62]

Originating as a social media hashtag modeled after right-wing activist Matt Walsh's documentary What Is A Woman? , [63] the initiative "Was ist eine Frau?" (What is a woman?) was started by women's rights activists Rona Duwe  [ de ] and an unnamed individual. [64] [65] It sought answers from the candidates for German federal election on the question "What is a woman?". [64] The campaign was supported by groups Initiative "Let Women Speak!", Women Heroines Association, and the Lesbian Action Center Reloaded. [64] Out of over 2000 candidates, by 6 February 2025, 100 had answered. [64]

Iceland

According to Women's Declaration International, an anti-trans advocacy group, [66] the number of trans-exclusionary feminists in Iceland is low. [67] According to Owl Fisher, a trans activist, trans rights have been supported by the Icelandic feminist movement for decades. [68]

Norway

In 2024 the Extremism Commission's report highlighted anti-LGBTIQ+ extremism and also cited sources that pointed to "the connections between radical feminism and Christian conservatism" in relation to anti-trans activism, noting that "these are groups and individuals who use violent and dehumanizing language and are also threatening and extremely active." [69] Gender studies scholar Janne Bromseth  [ no ] argued that "the anti-gender movement has (...) shifted boundaries in the public debate in Norway in recent years," resulting in "a harsher climate of debate where primarily organized TERFs have been given space to set the agenda for the 'debate on gender' and the alleged threat of 'gender ideology' to the natural order." [70]

In late 2025, Kvinneaktivistene hosted Susan Smith of British anti-trans group For Women Scotland on how Norwegian gender-critical activists could draw inspiration from the anti-transgender movement in the United Kingdom. [71] [72] The event drew protests, leading to a police presence as a result of the ensuing "chaos". [73] Later that year, Kvinnefronten and WDI Norway both hosted Reem Alsalem. Alsalem is described by scholars as a key anti-gender actor [74] who has "consistently argued for further barriers and restrictions on legal gender recognition that undercut the rights of transgender individuals," [75] and as part of an increasingly aggressive anti-queer and transphobic movement. [76]

Russia

In Russia, trans-exclusionary feminists, who position themselves as radical, constitute one of the two main streams of feminism. According to researcher Yana Kirey-Sitnikova, trans-exclusive radical feminism was first "imported" into Russia in 2013. [77] Unlike their opponents adhering to intersectional feminism, the trans-exclusionary group Womenation and a number of other trans-exclusionary feminists supported the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and came into conflict with Ukrainian feminist movement. Vanya Mark Solovey, a gender researcher, argues that the solidarity of Russian trans-exclusionary feminists with Russian policy towards Ukraine is closely related to the anti-trans sentiments of the Russian authorities. [78]

Spain

In Spain, the concept gained prominence in 2020 as a result of opposition from certain sections of the proposed “trans law” drafted by the Ministry of Equality, then headed by Irene Montero. [79] This proposal eliminated the requirement to present medical or psychological evidence in order to legally change a person's gender identity, a principle known as gender self-determination.

Sectors within the PSOE and Deputy Prime Minister Carmen Calvo, [80] [81] [82] as well as academic feminists such as Amelia Valcárcel, [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] Alicia Miyares [88] [89] and Lidia Falcón, [79] [90] led a campaign opposing the bill. Valcárcel and Miyares had taken part in the 16th Rosario de Acuña Feminist School in Gijón in 2019, where they gave speeches against trans people that received significant attention and contributed to the popularization of the term TERF in Spain. [79] [88]

In 2019, the Feminist Party led by Falcón issued a statement regarding trans and LGBT laws in Spain, which organizations such as Lambda (collective)  [ es ] and United Left described as an attack on trans people and a form of hate speech. [91] [92] and this ultimately led to the party's expulsion from the left-wing coalition. [93] [94] [95] In the following years, Valcárcel and Falcón were involved in other controversies related to trans and LGBT people. [96] [97] [98] [99] [94]

Finally, the PSOE and Unidas Podemos agreed to present a single law for the equality of trans people and the protection of LGBT rights, which was approved in February 2023 and included gender self-determination. [100] [101] [102] Calvo, who had led opposition to the bill from within the government, abstained during the vote and was ultimately not reappointed as deputy prime minister. [103]

Sweden

In Sweden, scholars Karlberg, Korolczuk, and Sältenberg have stated that gender-critical discourse is part of the broader anti-gender movement, which they argue contributes to the erosion of liberal democracy through exclusion and marginalization. [104] They describe such discourse as playing a role in what they call "insidious de-democratization," a gradual weakening of liberal norms through the targeting of already vulnerable groups, including trans people. [104] One of the more prominent actors associated with this discourse is the Swedish Women's Lobby (SWL), which has in recent years been criticized for adopting trans-exclusionary positions. [104] [105] [106] [107] In 2021, 943 priests and employees of the Church of Sweden condemned "trans-exclusionary feminism [that] uses rhetoric we recognize from radical right-wing Christian groups and right-wing populists," adding: "We mourn a rights movement that punches down. You, me, we, all of us, need a broad, solidarity-based feminism that fights restrictive gender norms." [108]

United Kingdom

In 2016, the House of Commons' Women and Equalities Committee issued a report recommending that the Gender Recognition Act 2004 be updated "in line with the principles of gender self-declaration". [109] Later in 2016, in England and Wales, a proposal was developed under Theresa May's government to revise the Act to introduce self-identification, with a public consultation opening in 2018. This proposed reform became a key locus of conflict for the emerging gender-critical movement, seeking to block reform of the Act, with a number of groups such as Fair Play For Women, For Women Scotland, and Woman's Place UK being formed. 2018 found a significant majority of respondents in favour of the GRA reforms, [110] however, in 2020, Boris Johnson's government dropped the reforms, instead reducing the cost of a gender recognition certificate and moving the application process online.[ citation needed ]

Another key locus of conflict for the emerging movement was the stance of LGBT rights charity Stonewall on trans issues. In 2015, Stonewall had begun campaigning for trans equality, with Stonewall head Ruth Hunt apologising for the organisation's previous failure to do so. [111] In 2019, the LGB Alliance was founded in opposition to Stonewall, accusing the organization of having "undermined women's sex-based rights and protections" and attempting "to introduce confusion between biological sex and the notion of gender". [112]

The year 2019 saw the formation of the Women's Human Rights Campaign (now Women's Declaration International) by noted gender-critical feminist Sheila Jeffreys and co-founder Heather Brunskell-Evans. The group published a manifesto titled the Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights, which argued that recognising trans women as women "constitutes discrimination against women" and called for the "elimination of that act". [113] [114]

J. K. Rowling is a prominent gender-critical feminist in the United Kingdom. J. K. Rowling 2010.jpg
J. K. Rowling is a prominent gender-critical feminist in the United Kingdom.

A 2020 paper in SAGE Open said that "the case against trans inclusion in the United Kingdom has been presented primarily through social media and blog-type or journalistic online platforms lacking the traditional prepublication checks of academic peer review". [115] Some public figures such as Graham Linehan [116] [117] [118] and J. K. Rowling [119] [120] [121] have often been featured in gender-critical social media posts. The Internet forum Mumsnet has also been a prominent hub of online gender-critical discourse. [122] [123]

Gender-critical views are common in the British media. [26] [124] The British press frequently publishes articles critical of trans people and trans issues. [124] In 2018, the US version of The Guardian published an editorial condemning an editorial in the UK version of The Guardian for transphobia, because it portrayed trans rights as being opposed to the rights of cis women. [125] Drawing on theory of radicalization, Craig McLean argues that discourse on transgender-related issues in the UK has been radicalized in response to the activities of what he terms the anti-transgender movement that pushes "a radical agenda to deny the basic rights of trans people (...) under the cover of 'free speech'". [126]

In Resolution 2417 (2022), the Council of Europe condemned "the highly prejudicial anti-gender, gender-critical and anti-trans narratives which reduce the fight for the equality of LGBTI people to what these movements deliberately mischaracterise as 'gender ideology' or 'LGBTI ideology'. Such narratives deny the very existence of LGBTI people, dehumanise them, and often falsely portray their rights as being in conflict with women's and children's rights, or societal and family values in general. All of these are deeply damaging to LGBTI people, while also harming women's and children's rights and social cohesion". The resolution further deplored "the extensive and often virulent attacks on the rights of LGBTI people that have been occurring for several years in, among other countries, Hungary, Poland, the Russian Federation, Turkey and the United Kingdom". [127] [128] [129]

Sociologists McLean and Stretesky argue that "a veritable miasma of anti-trans campaign groups [...] united in their antipathy toward transgender people" has contributed to an anti-trans moral panic in the United Kingdom. They identify anti-trans groups such as FiLiA, Fair Play for Women, Get the L Out, LGB Alliance, Sex Matters, and Transgender Trend. [130]

Sex-based rights

The term "sex-based rights" is used, primarily in the UK, to refer to a variety of legal positions, including:

  • Existing exceptions defined in the UK Equality Act 2010. These exceptions do not grant any right for individuals to be offered single-sex services, but do allow service providers to offer such services, if they are "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim". [131] [132]
  • Proposed changes to the Equality Act to clarify sex as meaning biological sex [133] [134] [135]
  • The belief that sex is central to the definition of women and women's rights, as opposed to basing law on gender identity. [136]

The gender-critical movement argues that recognition of transgender women as women conflicts with these rights. [137]

In 2019, the Maya Forstater v Center for Global Development tribunal case was launched by Maya Forstater, crowdfunding over £120,000. Earlier that year, Forstater's consulting contract for the Center for Global Development was not renewed after she made a number of social media posts saying that men cannot change into women. [138] Forstater subsequently sued the center, alleging that she had been discriminated against because of her views. [139] Forstater lost her initial case, with the judge ruling that her beliefs were not protected under the Equality Act due to their absolutism. However, in April 2021, the initial judgement was reversed, with the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruling that gender-critical beliefs were protected under the Equality Act. [140] A full merits hearing on Forstater's claim that she lost her employment as a result of these beliefs was heard in March 2022, and the decision, delivered in July 2022, was that Forstater had been subjected to direct discrimination and victimisation because of her gender-critical beliefs. [141]

In October 2020, Ann Sinnott, at the time a director of the LGB Alliance, initiated a legal case calling for a judicial review of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's guidance on the Equality Act 2010, crowdfunding almost £100,000 for legal fees. In May 2021 the case was found by the court to be unarguable, Justice Henshaw stating that "the claimant has shown no arguable reason to believe the Code has misled or will mislead service providers about their responsibilities under the Act". [142]

The Forstater case has been used as a precedent for several claims of discrimination against people holding gender-critical views. Employment tribunals have delivered successful judgements in cases against a barrister's chambers, Arts Council England, Westminster Council and Social Work England. Claims against Girlguiding UK and United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy ended in settlements, while a claim against the Department for Work and Pensions failed after the claimant was deemed to have gone too far by misgendering service users. The barrister Georgiana Calvert-Lee commented to the Guardian: "Above all, in a pluralistic society, which is what we want, you have to accept that people are going to have different views." [143]

In January 2024, Jo Phoenix was successful in a claim against the Open University for discrimination on the grounds of gender-critical beliefs. The tribunal ruled that she had been constructively unfairly dismissed, and that she had suffered victimisation and harassment in the form of an open letter from 386 of her colleagues, as well as individual disparagement for her views, including one professor comparing her to "the racist uncle at the Christmas table". [144]

An anonymous claimant brought a legal action against a government lawyer, Elspeth Duemmer-Wrigley, accusing her of harassment, and against the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, accusing it of fostering an "intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating and/or offensive environment" and called for the SEEN network to be dismantled. Duemmer-Wrigley is the chairwoman of the Sex Equality and Equity Network (SEEN). SEEN is a gender-critical group of more 700 civil servants from 50 government departments. In October 2023, leaders of SEEN, including Duemmer-Wrigley, wrote to the Cabinet Secretary that gender critical views were being silenced within the civil service, putting impartiality at risk. In March 2024, the harassment case against Duemmer-Wrigley was dropped just before a tribunal. [145]

In August 2024, Cambridgeshire County Council conceded that it had discriminated against Lizzie Pitt, a social worker, by initiating a disciplinary process against her following her gender-critical statements made at an LGBT support group. Pitt described the concession as a "win for the right side of history". The council admitted liability and agreed to pay compensation of £54,000. [146] [147]

In August 2024, a private settlement was reached between the Metanoia Institute and student psychotherapist James Esses. In a statement released following the settlement, the Metanoia Institute stated that it failed to follow its processes in not affording Esses a hearing prior to his expulsion after he expressed his gender-critical views and campaigned against a proposed ban on conversion therapy. In the statement, the institute apologized for publicizing the expulsion on social media. [148] [149]

In March 2025, The Telegraph reported that Northumbria Police apologised to a gender-critical campaigner for "unacceptable" treatment during their investigation of an alleged hate crime. [150]

In April 2025, the Supreme Court ruled in the case For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers that "the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex". [151]

Asia

China

China's development of a radical feminist movement has emerged in the context of the South Korean radical feminist movement, particularly the 6B4T principles. [152] [153] [154] Chinese radical feminism has largely grown as an online phenomenon, in the context of decreasing freedom of speech and increased repression of feminist activism via NGOs. [155] Developing into a movement on social media, Chinese radical feminists (CRFs) use platforms like Douban and Weibo to 'spread feminism' and bring gender inequality and violence against women into public consciousness. [154] [155] [156] This movement, first focused on promoting women's rights, eventually evolved in opposition to LGBT activism in China. [152] [154] A particular focus on transgender people started around 2020, with trans weightlifter Laurel Hubbard's participation in the 2020 Olympics and global debates over J. K. Rowling's tweets. [155] [157] [158]

Background

The idea of 21st century feminism in China has been identified as originating with the 1995 World Conference on Women in Beijing, [155] described by Wang Zheng and Ying Zhang as a "watershed" moment in Chinese feminism. [159] Following the conference, a movement of Chinese feminism developed in non-governmental organizations (NGOs), highlighting a rupture from state-led and Marxist theories of feminism and imported Western concepts of 'gender' into Chinese feminism. [155] [159] [160] These theoretical shifts in framing coincided with political changes in China allowing foreign involvement, resulting in a number of NGOs promoting feminist and LGBT issues. [160]

These NGOs operated within the constraints of Chinese politics, using inside connections to advocate for change while depoliticizing public engagement. [161] However, since 2013 under Xi Jinping's leadership, the Chinese Communist Party has sparked a revival in rhetoric embracing traditional gender roles, framing feminist and LGBT movements as 'foreign imports'. [160] [162] The arrest of the "five feminist sisters" in Beijing in 2015 was the culmination of this campaign, followed by a crackdown on LGBT content, increased repression, and led to a moribund offline feminist movement. [155] [160]

Radical feminism in China

Chinese radical feminists, known as jinü or jijin nüquan, promote the complete separation from men similar to Western and South Korean radical feminists, but reject any form of organization. [152] Like some Western radical feminists, there are trans-exclusionary voices in this movement, [163] [164] but their influence from the so-called "TERF Wars" in Western contexts leads them to reject cooperation with LGBTQ+ movements altogether. [152] Radical feminists often consider opposition to 'transgenderism' as one of the key defining characteristics distinguishing them from what they call 'free feminists' or 'equal rights fairies'. [165] [166] Chinese radical feminism is also characterized by a reliance on biological essentialism, [158] resonating with the essentialism that characterized Western second-wave feminism. [152] Zehao Pan argues that Chinese radical feminists (CRFs) are the most ardent opponents to trans inclusion, in light of their construction of trans women as a "threat" to cis women and belief in the underlying supremacy of 'biological sex'. [154]

Digital radical feminism later centered around the website Douban, noted for its permissive environment for private groups. [152] [155] These jinü often refer to transgender and other queer people as 异装癖 ('transvestites') and express suspicions about self-defined gender identities. [152] Other derogatory terms used by Chinese radical feminists include nankua ('male transgender') and kuazi ('transgenders'). [154]

Japan

Concordant with global and Japanese national rises in anti-gender and anti-LGBTQ discourse, there has been an increase in anti-transgender discourses in Japanese online media, [167] which since the 2010s has entered Japanese feminist discourses. [168] The pinnacle of the intensification of transphobia came with the 2018 Ochanomizu University's announcement that it would admit transgender students. [169] [170] [171] Both Anglo-European and Korean TERF contexts have influenced Japanese feminist transphobia, [171] :504 [172] [173] but result from a specific Japanese feminist context. [173]

Background

The first gender affirming surgery in Japan was approved in 1996 by the ethics committee of Saitama Medical University, [171] later performed in 1998. [174] This was followed by the Japan Society of Psychiatry and Neurology  [ jp ] publication of Guidelines of Care for Gender Identity Disorder, derived from WPATH guidelines, which led to the broader pathologization of transgender people under the category of 'gender identity disorder'. [174] The 2003 Act on Special Cases in Handling Gender in People with Gender Identity Disorder  [ jp ] (GID Act) institutionalized the biomedicalization of transgender identity, simultaneously permitting transsexuals to change gender on their koseki while constraining accepted transition to unmarried childless individuals, which Hidenobu Yamada suggests is to ensure the act would not disrupt patriarchal order. [171] Despite a split in the transgender community, [175] [173] the law received relatively little controversy in Japanese society and anchored the concept of GID as an identity. [171] [176]

Simultaneous with the development of GID and transgender rights discourses, feminism advanced women's rights in Japanese legal structures and culture. [171] The 1990s have been described as a 'booming decade' for Japanese women due to advances in women's rights, as the Japanese government passed multiple laws advancing women's rights and joined international initiatives aimed at advancing equality. [168] Anti-gender backlash movements developed in Japan in response to this progress, often targeting the concept of 'gender-free' (jendā-furī) advanced by feminist advocates, used to describe liberation from gender roles. [168] Anti-gender backlash framed 'gender-free' as diluting the reality of biological sex and any social divisions between men and women. [168] [171] In the context of the LGBT movement, anti-gender-free campaigns accused 'gender-free' feminism of destroying the nuclear family by promoting homosexuality and bisexuality, a means of denying biological sexes. [168] [173] However, feminist campaigners responded to conservative backlash to 'gender-free' not by highlighting the prejudice against LGBT people, but by simply denying they were promoting 'androgynous people'. [168] Researchers like Akiko Shimizu, Kazuyoshi Kawasaka and Hidenobu Yamada argue that mainstream feminism's failure to confront the anti-LGBT sentiments in anti-gender backlash underpin the rise of trans-exclusionary feminism in Japan. [168] [171] [173]

The 2003 GID Act imposed significant restrictions on trans people seeking to change their legal sex registration, requiring that appellants be unmarried, have no children, be sterile and have undergone gender affirmation surgery. [177] These restrictions, particularly the requirement for surgery, have been the subject of criticism by trans activists and legal scholar as a violation of human rights that attempts to impose normative sexuality, [178] prompting calls to replace the GID Special Cases Act. [179] A 2023 Supreme Court ruling found that the reproductive function requirement (sterility) was unconstitutional, violating Article 13 of the Japanese Constitution by violating individuals' freedom from "invasion into their body against their will". [180] [181]

Emergence of TERF

In 2018, Ochanomizu University, a women's national university in Tokyo, announced they would begin admitting transgender students in 2020, [182] following a growing understanding of LGBTQ rights, including the Science Council of Japan's advisory report. [168] However, feminists online quickly expressed concerns about trans inclusion, mirroring typical transphobic discourses about supposed safety issues in bathrooms. [168] [183] A 2020 quantitative analysis of Twitter posts by Takanori Tamura found that the number of posts containing the phrase "trans woman" increased 36-fold in a month. [184] [185]

In 2019, an essay was published describing a transgender woman who committed suicide after receiving threats on Twitter following the university's announcement. [186] In April 2019, a statement denouncing trans-exclusion and discrimination was signed by 2715 scholars and feminists. [187] [188] In 2020, the women's group Women's Action Group  [ jp ] published an article 'It’s Not That We Are Excluding Transgender People' by an anonymous self-described 'gender-critical' author who framed trans women as threats to cis women's safety and denounced the term 'TERF' as derogatory. [168]

Another aspect relevant to the rise of anti-transgender feminism in Japan is Anglo-European political discourses on transgender rights. Shimizu Akiko argues that before 2018, there was not a significant anti-transgender discourse in Japanese feminism. [173] By the end of 2018, however, internet users imported terminology and discourses from Anglophone and Korean spaces to express their opposition to trans rights. [171] Korean feminist discourses, such as the 4B movement, have also influenced Japanese anti-trans feminism. [171] [173]

Japanese feminists began to translate British gender-critical feminist material and other trans-antagonistic media, while pro-transgender feminists and activists translated the responses. [167] However, in contrast to South Korean translations of Anglophone feminist works, Japanese versions of popular feminist works were more commonly translated by academics rather than TERFs and have not received as much popular success. [189]

Just as in other countries, Japanese anti-trans radical feminists have made alliances with the far-right. [169] [171] Kazuyoshi Kawasaka argues that anti-transgender feminist discourses have 're-energised' conservative activism against LGBTQ rights politics. [169] Some anti-trans feminists have argued they are compelled to support the ultraconservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), [170] and famous radical feminist novelist Yoriko Shono professed her support for LDP politician Yamatani Eriko in a "single-issue alliance" to oppose gender self-identification. [169] [190]

Save Women's Spaces

A private organization Save Women's Spaces JP  [ jp ] was founded in September 2021. In October 2021, the organization joined Women's Declaration International, [191] an anti-trans [192] [193] group that has been described as gender-critical. [194] :29 The group has lobbied against the LGBT Understanding Promotion Act, [195] a law that establishes basic principles regarding the promotion of measures to broaden understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people and other sexual minorities in Japan. The law was later criticized by LGBTQ activists for being ineffective at addressing the issues of the LGBTQ community in Japan. [196] The organization filed a lawsuit in 2022 against Liu Lingjun, a man who had criticized the organization, calling it a "malicious anti-trans group". [197] [198] In July 2024, the lawsuit was dismissed on the grounds that the social media comment did not go further than opinion or commentary. [198] Minori Moriya, co-chair of Save Women's Spaces, was invited to a 2023 meeting establishing a group of LDP lawmakers aimed at 'dispelling concerns' that the LGBT Understanding Promotion Act would allow transgender women to use women's spaces. [199] This group, called the "Parliamentary League to Protect Women", started work to create a law to protect women's spaces in May 2025. [200]

South Korea

In 2016, the radical feminist online community Womad split from the larger radical feminist online community Megalia after Megalia issued a ban on the use of certain explicit slurs against gay men and transgender people. This change in policy led to the migration of anti-LGBT members. [201]

In February 2020, Sookmyung Women's University accepted its first transgender student. The decision prompted a strong backlash both within and outside of the university, including from radical feminist student organizations. However, some students, and the university's Student and Minority Human Rights Commission, supported the decision. [202] [203] [204]

Lee Hyun-Jae has noted that in the South Korean "feminism reboot" of the early 21st century, the radical stance of recent feminists have been "oriented in an identity politics based on biological sex", and that "the radical stance of today's [young] feminists has a tendency to emphasize the identity of the 'female body' as based on the category of the 'biological woman,' taking an attitude of excluding 'biological' men refugees, and transgender people". [205] Jinsook Kim has noted that "in Korean contexts, there have been increasing concerns over popular forms of feminism based on a strong female identity rooted in notions of biological sex, the pursuit of female-only and -first politics, and the refusal of solidarity with other social minority groups". [206]

Turkey

In Turkey, the division between trans-inclusion and trans-exclusion has a longer historical grounding. [207] Both feminist and trans rights movements have their roots in activism that began after the 1980 military coup. [207] However, trans exclusionary feminism has become more salient within the Turkish feminist movement since 2018. [208] Lara Özlen argues that, rather than a direct import of anti-trans feminisms from the UK, Turkish TERF has to be understood in the context of Turkish feminist history and recent right-wing provocations. [207]

Background

Turkish feminism, while having more distant historical origins in the Ottoman empire, swelled into a proper movement after the 1980 military coup d'etat. [207] [209] :52-57 [210] Largely middle-class, urban, educated women, this burgeoning wave of feminist activism embraced language such as patriarchy, sexism, gender inequality to describe society. [207] [209] Alongside a development in feminist consciousness, a LGBT rights movement also developed in Turkey, commonly cited as being sparked by the 1987 hunger strikes in Gezi Park by trans sex workers. [207] [209] [211] Also in 1987 was the Campaign Against the Battering of Women, when women in Istanbul marched at Yogurtcu Park to protest woman battering. [207] [212] These public displays of protest and calls for action brought feminism and LGBT rights issues to the forefront of social discourse and public awareness. [209] Feminists like Ayşe Düzkan highlight the presence of trans women in the early feminist movement, including at Yogurtcu Park. [210] [213] [214] Upon its original emergence in the 1990s, the LGBT rights movement in Turkey had broader support among social groups like feminists, ecologists and anarchists. [215] Despite differences in goals advanced by these more concrete movements of feminism and LGBT activism, there was overlap on opposition to gender killings. Broader Turkish civil society also conflated the two in crackdowns, integrating the two in opposition to the state. [207]

TERF in Turkey

Opposition to trans inclusion in Turkey has historical roots: Kurdish trans women Esmeray and Demet initially faced opposition in some feminist spaces in the 1990s, being accused of harboring "male energy". [207] [216] :258

During the International Women's Day (March 8) parade in 2011, a trans man participant was told that "men are not allowed in this space" and asked to exit. [207] [217] As a result, Amargi, a feminist social collective and magazine, organized a roundtable focusing on the inclusion of trans people in the Turkish feminist movement, which was held in 2011 and 2012. [207] [208] According to academic Lara Özlen, the discussions partially ameliorated divisions between queer activists and cis feminists, but did not fully resolve the controversy. [207]

In late 2018 and 2019, feminist academics began to share anti-trans texts from Anglosphere contexts, which grew into a more hostile debate on social media by 2019. [207] [208] [218] These debates, largely on social media platforms like Twitter, invoked discourses about hormone replacement therapy, desistance, and the concept of male privilege. [207] [208] These cis feminists commonly cited UK-based sources during these debates. [207] In response to the 'TERF debate', LGBT groups Kaos GL and Pink Life Association  [ tr ] issued statements condemning transphobia. [219]

In February 2021, a group Kadınız Öfkeliyiz (KÖ, We Are Women, We Are Angry) was launched, described by philosopher Büşra Tosun Durmuş as "producing discourse in defense of biological womanhood". [220] The group tried to sabotage the March 8th protests in March 2022 with transphobic signs, [208] but they were denied entry to the parade. [218] [221]

References

  1. Thurlow, Claire (2022). "From TERF to gender critical: A telling genealogy?". Sexualities . 27 (4): 962–978. doi:10.1177/13634607221107827. S2CID   252662057.
  2. Williams, Cristan (2016). "Radical Inclusion: Recounting the Trans Inclusive History of Radical Feminism". Transgender Studies Quarterly. 3 (1–2): 254–258. doi: 10.1215/23289252-3334463 .
  3. Rogers, Baker A. (2023). "TERFs aren't feminists: lesbians stand against trans exclusion". Journal of Lesbian Studies . 28 (1): 24–43. doi:10.1080/10894160.2023.2252286. PMID   37679960. S2CID   261608725. many lesbians despise TERF ideology
  4. 1 2 Bassi, Serena; LaFleur, Greta (2022). "Introduction: TERFs, Gender-Critical Movements, and Postfascist Feminisms". Transgender Studies Quarterly . 9 (3): 311–333. doi: 10.1215/23289252-9836008 . S2CID   253052875.
  5. 1 2 Pearce, Ruth; Erikainen, Sonja; Vincent, Ben (2020). "TERF wars: An introduction". The Sociological Review . 68 (4): 677–698. doi:10.1177/0038026120934713. hdl: 2164/18988 . S2CID   221097475. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
  6. UK Parliament (7 December 2022). "Employment Tribunal rulings on gender-critical beliefs in the workplace". House of Commons Library. Archived from the original on 11 May 2024. Retrieved 22 October 2023.
  7. Sullivan, Alice; Todd, Selina (10 July 2023), "Introduction", Sex and Gender (1 ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 1–15, doi:10.4324/9781003286608-1, ISBN   978-1-003-28660-8 , retrieved 20 October 2023
  8. Burns, Katelyn (5 September 2019). "The rise of anti-trans "radical" feminists, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 29 August 2022. "I don't think American women are buying it", she said, pointing out that nearly every major US feminist advocacy group is vocally pro-trans rights and inclusion.
  9. Thomsen, Carly; Essig, Laurie (2021). "Lesbian, feminist, TERF: a queer attack on feminist studies". Journal of Lesbian Studies . 26 (1): 27–44. doi:10.1080/10894160.2021.1950270. PMID   34313195. S2CID   236452285.
  10. Dickey, Briar (2023). "Transphobic Truth Markets: Comparing Trans-hostile Discourses in British Trans-exclusionary Radical Feminist and US Right-wing Movements". Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2): 34–47. doi: 10.21825/digest.85311 .
  11. Hines, Sally (2020). "Sex wars and (trans) gender panics: Identity and body politics in contemporary UK feminism" (PDF). The Sociological Review . 68 (4): 699–717. doi: 10.1177/0038026120934684 . S2CID   221097483. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  12. Bae, Sooyoun (2023-02-01). Discord Between Transgender Women and TERFs in South Korea (PDF). The Asian Conference on Education 2022: Official Conference Proceedings. The International Academic Forum. doi: 10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2023.67 . ISSN   2186-5892. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 29 June 2024.
  13. Lee, Hyun-Jae (December 2020). "A Critical Study of Identity Politics Based on the Category 'Biological Woman' in the Digital Era: How Young Korean Women Became Transgender Exclusive Radical Feminists". Journal of Asian Sociology. 49 (4): 425–448. doi: 10.21588/dns.2020.49.4.003 . JSTOR   26979894.
  14. Billard, Thomas J (2023-04-03). ""Gender-Critical" Discourse as Disinformation: Unpacking TERF Strategies of Political Communication". Women's Studies in Communication. 46 (2): 235–243. doi:10.1080/07491409.2023.2193545. ISSN   0749-1409. S2CID   258464300. Archived from the original on 2 July 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023.
  15. Willem, Cilia; Platero, R. Lucas; Tortajada, Iolanda (2022). "Trans-exclusionary Discourses on Social Media in Spain". Identities and Intimacies on Social Media. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. pp. 185–200. doi: 10.4324/9781003250982-15 . ISBN   978-1-003-25098-2. OCLC   1334107848.
  16. Tudor, Alyosxa (May 2023). "The anti-feminism of anti-trans feminism". European Journal of Women's Studies. 30 (2): 290–302. doi: 10.1177/13505068231164217 . ISSN   1350-5068.
  17. Ben Chika, Fourat (21 September 2021), Combating rising hate against LGBTI people in Europe (Provisional version) (PDF), Council of Europe Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination, archived (PDF) from the original on 23 September 2021, retrieved 8 December 2021
  18. Butler, Judith. "Why is the idea of 'gender' provoking backlash the world over?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  19. "'Rights aren't a competition': Anti-trans hate is on the rise in Canada, activists and advocates say". CTV News. Archived from the original on 29 November 2021. Retrieved 29 November 2021.
  20. Alm, Erika; Engebretsen, Elisabeth L. (15 June 2020). "Gender Self-identification". Lambda Nordica. 25 (1): 48–56. doi: 10.34041/ln.v25.613 . hdl: 11250/3048285 . S2CID   225712334.
  21. Studnik, Joane (24 January 2023). "Was bedeutet TERF? Wie linke Transfeindlichkeit Rechtsextreme stärkt" [What does TERF mean? How left-wing transphobia strengthens the far right]. Der Freitag .
  22. "Conferência Nacional de Mulheres aprova moção de repúdio a grupos antigênero". Associação Nacional de Travestis e Transexuais (in Brazilian Portuguese). 2025-10-02. Retrieved 2025-11-21.
  23. 1 2 3 Ghania, Yasmine (15 April 2025). "B.C. nurse appeals disciplinary decision over transgender comments". CBC News . Archived from the original on 30 April 2025. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
  24. "B.C. nurse suspended by college, asked to pay $94K in costs for comments about transgender people". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 16 August 2025. Archived from the original on 18 August 2025. Retrieved 2 November 2025.
  25. Manus, Siobhan Guerrero Mc; Neuhouser, Julianna Stone (2023-12-11). "Gender Critical Feminism in Mexico: Origins, Particularities, Attributes". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.89999. ISSN   2593-0281. Archived from the original on 29 December 2023.
  26. 1 2 3 Burns, Katelyn (5 September 2019). "The rise of anti-trans "radical" feminists, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 29 August 2022. "I don't think American women are buying it", she said, pointing out that nearly every major US feminist advocacy group is vocally pro-trans rights and inclusion.
  27. 1 2 3 Hajzler, Yacha (2023-06-03). "Marie Cau, maire transgenre du Nord, porte plainte contre la blogueuse Dora Moutot pour "incitation à la haine"". France 3 Hauts-de-France (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  28. 1 2 Costello, Katherine (2023-12-11). "Christine Delphy, an Anti-essentialist TERF: Materialist Feminism and the Affective Legacies of the MLF". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.85689. ISSN   2593-0281.
  29. Roux, Ange (2025-01-31). Les féminismes anti-trans français : étude de discours altérisants et analyse de récits intimes trans' (Thesis). Université de Genève.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 Bock, Pauline (5 September 2022). "Planning familial : les anti-trans, "cautions progressistes" des réacs". Arrêt sur images. Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  31. "Observatoire la Petite Sirène | Recherches". OBS LA PETITE SIRÈNE. Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  32. Folliot, Coline (2025-01-07).  Le Lobby transphobe » : décrypter la panique morale autour des transidentités". Le Monde (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  33. Carboulec, Rozenn Le (2022-05-17). "Mineurs trans : des groupuscules conservateurs passent à l'offensive". Mediapart (in French). Archived from the original on 4 Oct 2022. Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  34. 1 2 3 Fassin, Éric (2023-12-11). "An Epidemic of Transphobia on French Turf". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.90002. ISSN   2593-0281.
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gomolka, C. J. (2025). "Precarity and the Politics of Feminist Kinship: Trans-inclusive Feminism and the Collages Féminicides Movement". Women in French Studies: Special Issue 2025. doi:10.48707/bngr-9j15. ISSN   1077-825X.
  36. "Le mouvement Collages féminicides se déchire sur la question trans" (in French). 2020-01-31. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  37. Motila, Flavie; Peyronne, Lisa; Poupard, Marielle. "Transgenre et féministe : le duo qui dérange | Magazin". Magazin – EPJT (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  38. Checknews, Service. "Quel est le point de départ de la polémique sur la place des trans dans le féminisme ?". Libération (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  39. 1 2 Tribune. "Le débat sur la place des femmes trans n'a pas lieu d'être". Libération (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  40. Fassin, Éric (2023-12-11). "An Epidemic of Transphobia on French Turf". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi: 10.21825/digest.90002 . ISSN   2593-0281. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  41. "Le Planning familial critiqué pour une affiche avec un homme transgenre enceint, la ministre Isabelle Rome apporte son soutien à l'association". Le Monde (in French). 2022-08-22. Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  42. Corre, Maëlle Le (2022-11-10). "La députée Aurore Bergé veut exclure les hommes trans de la protection du droit à l'IVG". Madmoizelle (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  43. Bussigny, Nora (2023-01-13).  Femelliste », la nouvelle chapelle féministe controversée". Le Point (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  44. 1 2 Leray, Cassandre. "Des associations LGBT+ poursuivent Dora Moutot pour «injures et appel à la haine transphobes»". Libération (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  45. Schön, Gabrielle (2023-03-21). ""Femelliste" : Plainte contre Dora Moutot et Marguerite Sterne". AssoMousse (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  46. 1 2 Mary, Clémence. "Avec «femellisme», refus du genre et retour au sexe". Libération (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  47. Pruvot, Ségolène (2025), Smrdelj, Rok; Kuhar, Roman (eds.), "The Battle of Concepts: French Feminist Mobilizations Against the Far Right's Appropriation of the Feminist Legacy", Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe and the Feminist Response: Productive Resistance, Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 81–105, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87693-6_4, ISBN   978-3-031-87693-6 , retrieved 2025-11-08
  48. Maffi, Jolan (2023-03-01). "La riposte transphobe s'organise pour défendre la militante terf Dora Moutot". KOMITID (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  49. Moutot, Dora (2023-06-26). "The corruption of French feminism". UnHerd. Retrieved 2025-11-04.
  50. valeursactuelles (2023-02-28). "Des personnalités dénoncent la plainte déposée contre la journaliste accusée de transphobie Dora Moutot". Valeurs actuelles (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-06.
  51. 1 2 3 4 Hills, Eden (2025-07-03). "Trans-Exclusionary, Transnational: Gender-Critical Feminism and the Overstatement of Harm in the UK and Germany | Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory". Redescriptions. doi:10.33134/rds.441.
  52. 1 2 3 4 5 Zahn, Pauline H.; Lünenborg, Margreth (2024). "#FrauenSagenNein - bridging the divide: analyzing the affective network of gender-critical alliances". Feminist Media Studies. 0: 1–19. doi:10.1080/14680777.2024.2400497. ISSN   1468-0777.
  53. 1 2 3 Dams, Marin (2022). Eine Kritische Diskursanalyse des Diskurses um Transgeschlechtlichkeit in der 'Emma' (Masters thesis) (in German). Universität zu Köln.
  54. McKay, Shav (2023-10-20). "Gender Self-Determination, With Fine Print". The Left Berlin. Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  55. Gregson, Julie (1 November 2024). "Germany's transgender rights law takes effect – DW – 11/01/2024". dw.com. Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  56. "Das Selbstbestimmungsgesetz: Antworten zur Abschaffung des Transsexuellengesetzes (TSG) & §45B Personenstandsgesetz". www.lsvd.de (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  57. Bildung, Bundeszentrale für politische (2024-10-31). "1. November: Selbstbestimmungsgesetz tritt in Kraft | Hintergrund aktuell". bpb.de (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  58. Hausbichler, Beate (11 Apr 2022). "Buch über Transgender: Viele Stimmen, aber nur eine Botschaft". DER STANDARD (in Austrian German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  59. 1 2 Studnik, Joane (2021-05-12). ""Emma" und der TERF-Train". Berliner Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  60. 1 2 "Terre des Femmes zieht transfeindliches Positionspapier zurück". queer.de (in German). 26 Jul 2022. Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  61. "Vorwurf der Transfeindlichkeit gegen TERRE DES FEMMES". frauenrechte.de (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  62. Klein, Jeja. "Terre des Femmes hat sich über Transfrage gespalten". queer.de (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  63. Scholz, Dr Juliane. "Die gefährliche Fangfrage der TERFs". queer.de (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  64. 1 2 3 4 Hoppe, Janne (6 February 2025). "Bundestagswahl: Was ist eine Frau? Einige Parteien tun sich mit dieser Frage schwer - WELT". DIE WELT (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  65. "Lobbyregistereintrag "Rona Duwe"". Lobbyregister beim Deutschen Bundestag (in German). Retrieved 2025-11-07.
  66. Grinspan, Mauro Cabral; Eloit, Ilana; Paternotte, David; Verloo, Mieke (2023-12-11). "Exploring TERFnesses". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.90008. ISSN   2593-0281.
  67. "Iceland - Women's Declaration International". womensdeclaration.com. Archived from the original on 2025-06-16. Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  68. Jónsdóttir, Ugla (2019-09-09). "When feminism supports trans rights, everybody wins – just like in Iceland". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  69. "NOU 2024: 3: Felles innsats mot ekstremisme". Government of Norway. 2024.
  70. Bromseth, Janne (7 July 2022). "'Nu följer ilskan mot medias ansvarslöshet'". Ottar. Archived from the original on 12 July 2022.
  71. "Kvinneaktivistenes åpne møter". Kvinneaktivistene. Archived from the original on 12 September 2025. Retrieved 12 September 2025.
  72. "Kvinners nye rettighetskamp: Hva kan vi lære av Storbritannia?". Litteraturhuset. Archived from the original on 2025-09-13. Retrieved 13 September 2025.
  73. "Møte om biologiske kvinner avbrutt av demonstranter. Måtte ha politivakt". Subjekt. 27 October 2025.
  74. Duffy, S. A. (2024). "'Ideological Colonising': The Influence of Anti-Gender Movements on Domestic and International Human Rights Law". In Paige, T. P.; O'Hara, C. (eds.). Queer Encounters with International Law: Lives, Communities, Subjectivities. Routledge. pp. 175–199. doi:10.4324/9781032643106-12.
  75. Zwingel, Susanne; Hernandez, Brianna N.; Turbino Torres, Luisa (2025). Feminist Responses to Crises and Dehumanization: Transnational Scholar-Activist Perspectives. Routledge. ISBN   9781032805382.
  76. Paige, Tamsin Phillipa; O'Hara, Claerwen (2024). "(Re)queering international law". In Paige, T. P.; O'Hara, C. (eds.). Queer Encounters with International Law: Lives, Communities, Subjectivities. Routledge. pp. 1–12. doi:10.4324/9781032643106-1. ISBN   978-1-032-64310-6.
  77. Kirey-Sitnikova, Yana (2023-12-11). "TERF and Anti-trans Initiatives in Russia: Is There a Connection?". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.89998. ISSN   2593-0281.
  78. Solovey, Vanya Mark (2023-05-30). "Feminism and Aggressive Imperialism: Russian Feminist Politics in Wartime". Femina Politica – Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft. 32 (1): 95–101. doi: 10.3224/feminapolitica.v32i1.08 . ISSN   2196-1646.
  79. 1 2 3 Vives Bauçà, Bel (2021). "Sobre "agendes queer", "lobbies trans" i "sectes mutants": feminisme trans-excloent a l'Estat espanyol". Clivatge (9). doi:10.1344/CLIVATGE2021.9.13.
  80. "Los colectivos LGTB llaman al boicot de un PSOE "tránsfobo lleno de bulos y prejuicios"". El Mundo (in Spanish). 2020-06-14. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
  81. "La alargada sombra de Carmen Calvo en el debate sobre la ley trans en el PSOE". Público. 2022-10-19. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
  82. Solís, Raúl (2022). La batalla trans. Barcelona: Bellaterra. ISBN   978-84-18684-34-0.
  83. "Amelia Valcárcel: «Sé lo que es el sexo, lo otro no sé, es un concepto»". La Voz de Asturias (in Spanish). 2021-07-07. Retrieved 2023-07-07.
  84. Agencias (2021-02-08). "Varias feministas históricas lanzan un manifiesto contra la 'ley trans': "Es reaccionaria"". El Confidencial (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-07-03.
  85. Debate, El (2023-05-28). "Amelia Valcárcel: «El lobby 'queer' intenta suplantar el movimiento feminista»". El Debate (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-07-07.
  86. "Amelia Valcárcel sobre la Ley Trans: "No podemos dañar a nuestros hijos para que cuatro personas conserven sus puestecitos"". ELMUNDO (in Spanish). 2022-10-18. Retrieved 2023-07-07.
  87. Vallejo, Cristina (2022-12-16). "La filósofa socialista Amelia Valcárcel cierra filas con el PP en la ley trans". Las Provincias (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-07-03.
  88. 1 2 Miguel Trula, Esther (2021-10-01). ""Digo tíos porque son tíos": quiénes son las TERF y por qué están dividiendo al movimiento feminista". Magnet. Retrieved 2022-06-17.
  89. Sánchez, G. (29 November 2022). "Alicia Miyares: "Detrás de muchos menores que dicen ser trans laten realidades como el bullying o el autismo"". Levante. Retrieved 18 September 2023.
  90. "El partido feminista y Vox se unen contra la Ley Trans que ven "peligrosa" y anticonstitucional". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 2021-03-23. Retrieved 2023-07-09.
  91. "Respuesta al comunicado del Partido Feminista firmado por Lidia Falcón el 4 de diciembre de 2019". Lambda Valencia. 9 December 2019. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  92. Redacción (7 December 2019). "IU se desmarca de las declaraciones del Partido Feminista sobre la transexualidad". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  93. Redacción (23 February 2020). "Izquierda Unida expulsa al Partido Feminista". El Salto. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  94. 1 2 Sen, Cristina; Guindal, Carlota (2020-12-14). "Lidia Falcón reafirma ante la Fiscalía que el movimiento trans empuja la pedofilia". La Vanguardia. Retrieved 2022-06-17.
  95. Rodrigo, Borja (25 February 2020). "Por qué Izquierda Unida ha aprobado expulsar al Partido Feminista". Newtral. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  96. "They accused UNAM of being a transphobic institution for comments from academics". Infobae (in European Spanish). 25 March 2022. Retrieved 2023-07-03.
  97. "Carla Antonelli contraataca duramente a Amelia Valcárcel: «Sigue siendo una tránsfoba de manual»". La Voz de Asturias (in Spanish). 2022-10-20. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  98. "Amelia Valcárcel sobre la Ley Trans: "La T se está comiendo a la L y a la G"". RTPA. Retrieved 2023-07-16.
  99. Efe (7 January 2021). "Denuncian a Lidia Falcón por vincular la homosexualidad y la pedofilia". Heraldo de Aragón (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-09.
  100. Álvarez, Pilar (29 June 2021). "Así queda la 'ley trans' en España: un "paso de gigante" para el colectivo LGTBI, según el Gobierno". El País. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  101. Borraz, Marta (2021-06-29). "El Gobierno aprueba la 'ley trans', que contempla la autodeterminación de género". elDiario.es. Retrieved 2022-06-17.
  102. Bonilla, Paula (2023-02-17). "Cronología de la Ley trans y LGTBI". Newtral (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-17.
  103. "El PSOE expedienta a Carmen Calvo por no apoyar la Ley Trans y podría sancionarla con 600 euros". Europa Press. 2022-12-23. Retrieved 2023-09-18.
  104. 1 2 3 Karlberg, Eva; Korolczuk, Elżbieta; Sältenberg, Hansalbin (2025). "Insidious de-democratization: Conceptualizing anti-gender politics in Sweden". Journal of Gender Studies . 34 (1): 732–748. doi:10.1080/09589236.2024.2446345.
  105. Alm, Erika; Engebretsen, Elisabeth Lund (2020). "Gender Self-identification". Lambda Nordica . 25 (1): 48–56. doi:10.34041/ln.v25.613.
  106. Grahn, Michal; Holm, Malin (2025). "Trans inclusive no more? Allies and adversaries of gender self-identification in Sweden". European Journal of Politics and Gender. 8 (1): 234–241. doi:10.1332/25151088Y2024D000000052.
  107. Ortiz, Joel Mauricio Isabel (9 June 2019). "Hur ska vi förstå transfobin?". Ottar . Archived from the original on 2 February 2025. Retrieved 31 May 2025.
  108. 943 Church of Sweden employees (2021). "Personligt brev till dig som är trans" [A personal letter to you who are transgender] (in Swedish). Church of Sweden. Archived from the original on 2021-05-19.
  109. Women and Equalities Committee (8 January 2016). Transgender Equality (Report). House of Commons. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 1 November 2021. Within the current Parliament, the Government must bring forward proposals to update the Gender Recognition Act, in line with the principles of gender self-declaration that have been developed in other jurisdictions. In place of the present medicalised, quasi-judicial application process, an administrative process must be developed, centred on the wishes of the individual applicant, rather than on intensive analysis by doctors and lawyers.
  110. King, Daniel; Carrie Paechter; Maranda Ridgway (22 September 2020). "Reform of the Gender Recognition Act — Analysis of consultation responses". Her Majesty's Stationery Office. pp. 8–9. CP 294. Archived from the original on 5 October 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  111. Gani, Aisha (16 February 2015). "Stonewall to start campaigning for trans equality". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  112. Hellen, Nicholas (22 September 2019). "'Anti-women' trans policy may split Stonewall". The Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  113. "MPs urged by anti-trans 'women's rights' group to eliminate 'transgenderism' and scrap Gender Recognition Act". Pink News . Archived from the original on 22 September 2022. Retrieved 2 December 2021.
  114. "Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights: Full Text - Women's Declaration International". Archived from the original on 7 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  115. Zanghellini, Aleardo (1 April 2020). "Philosophical Problems With the Gender-Critical Feminist Argument Against Trans Inclusion". SAGE Open. 10 (2) 2158244020927029. doi: 10.1177/2158244020927029 . S2CID   219733494.
  116. "A so-called 'gender critical coming out day' for TERFs sparks blistering backlash". 12 November 2021. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  117. "Graham Linehan calls for list of Irish 'gender critical' therapists for trans children". 5 February 2020. Archived from the original on 5 March 2022. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  118. "Graham Linehan, creator of 'The IT Crowd' and 'Father Ted,' has been removed from Twitter". 27 June 2020. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  119. "J.K. Rowling explains her gender identity views in essay amid backlash". CNN . 10 June 2020. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  120. Brooks, Libby (11 June 2020). "Why is JK Rowling speaking out now on sex and gender debate?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  121. "Why feminists like me stand with JK Rowling in trans rights row – Susan Dalgety | The Scotsman". 11 July 2020. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  122. Ntim, Zac (13 June 2018). "Mumsnet brings in tougher forum rules after transgender row". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  123. "Mumsnet moderators are struggling to find the line between free speech and transphobia". Wired UK. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  124. 1 2 "Anti-trans rhetoric is rife in the British media. Little is being done to extinguish the flames". CNN . 9 October 2021. Archived from the original on 11 March 2023. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  125. Levin, Sam; Chalabi, Mona; Siddiqui, Sabrina (2 November 2018). "Why we take issue with the Guardian's stance on trans rights in the UK". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 23 May 2019. Retrieved 14 May 2019.
  126. McLean, Craig (2021). "The Growth of the Anti-Transgender Movement in the United Kingdom. The Silent Radicalization of the British Electorate" (PDF). International Journal of Sociology. 51 (6): 473–482. doi:10.1080/00207659.2021.1939946. S2CID   237874806. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  127. "Resolution 2417 (2022): Combating rising hate against LGBTI people in Europe". Council of Europe. 25 January 2022. Archived from the original on 19 November 2022. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  128. Duffy, Nick (25 January 2022). "Council of Europe condemns 'virulent attacks on LGBT rights' in the UK, Hungary and Poland". i . Archived from the original on 30 January 2022. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
  129. "Council of Europe compares UK to Russia and Poland over 'virulent attacks' on LGBT+ rights". PinkNews. Archived from the original on 30 May 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  130. McLean, Anna; Stretesky, Paul B. (2025). "The Influence of Authoritarian Beliefs on Support for Transgender Rights in the UK". Sociology Compass. 19 (7) e70088. doi: 10.1111/soc4.70088 . eISSN   1751-9020. A veritable miasma of anti-trans campaign groups have wafted in to public discourse in recent years. These have included, but are not limited to, Authentic Equity Alliance, CitizenGo, FiLiA, Fair Play for Women, Get the L Out, Keep Prisons Single Sex, Lesbian Rights Alliance, LGB Alliance, MayDay4Women, Object!, Safe Schools Alliance, Sex Matters, Transgender Trend, and Woman's Place UK. Although the ostensible focus of these groups is varied, they are united in their antipathy toward transgender people.
  131. "Attorney General affirms sex-based rights". Woman's Place UK. 11 August 2022. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  132. "Gender reassignment provisions in the Equality Act". Equality and Human Rights Commission. Archived from the original on 29 September 2023. Retrieved 11 September 2023.
  133. Allegretti, Aubrey (5 April 2023). "What would changing the Equality Act mean for trans people and single-sex spaces?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  134. "Clarifying the definition of 'sex' in the Equality Act | EHRC". www.equalityhumanrights.com. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 2024-07-07.
  135. "Tories pledge to tackle 'confusion' over legal definition of sex". BBC News. 2024-06-03. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 2024-07-07.
  136. Davidson, Gina (6 November 2019). "Women's rights declaration sparks accusations of discrimination". The Scotsman . Archived from the original on 3 December 2021. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
  137. Valcore, Jace; Fradella, Henry F.; Guadalupe-Diaz, Xavier; Ball, Matthew J.; Dwyer, Angela; Dejong, Christina; Walker, Allyn; Wodda, Aimee; Worthen, Meredith G. F. (2021). "Building an Intersectional and Trans-Inclusive Criminology: Responding to the Emergence of "Gender Critical" Perspectives in Feminist Criminology". Critical Criminology. 29 (4): 687–706. doi:10.1007/s10612-021-09590-0. S2CID   244192331. Archived from the original on 7 December 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
  138. "Researcher who lost job for tweeting 'men cannot change into women' loses employment tribunal". The Independent. 19 December 2019. Archived from the original on 22 April 2022. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  139. Gordon, Jane (23 April 2021). "'I am fighting for the right to say men can never be women'". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 February 2022. Retrieved 23 April 2021.
  140. Cross, Michael. "Appeal backs woman over 'transphobic tweets' 10 June 2021". lawgazette. Law Society Gazette. Archived from the original on 17 June 2021. Retrieved 17 June 2021.
  141. "Maya Forstater: Woman discriminated against over trans tweets, tribunal rules". BBC News. 6 July 2022. Archived from the original on 12 March 2023. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  142. "Judge throws out LGB Alliance founder's fight to ban trans women from women's spaces". PinkNews . 6 May 2021. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  143. Siddique, Haroon (19 January 2024). "A politically toxic issue': the legal battles over gender-critical beliefs". theguardian.com. Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
  144. Siddique, Haroon (22 January 2024). "Open University academic wins tribunal case over gender-critical views". theguardian.com. Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  145. Gibbons, Katie (2024-03-27). "Civil servant sued over gender critical beliefs has case dropped". The Times . Archived from the original on 12 January 2025. Retrieved 2025-01-12.
  146. Henderson, Cameron (2024-08-02). "Council admits discriminating against social worker over her gender-critical views". The Daily Telegraph . Archived from the original on 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-10.
  147. Moss, Rob (17 September 2024). "Judge urges council to mandate 'freedom of belief' training". personneltoday.com. Personnel Today. Archived from the original on 19 September 2024. Retrieved 19 September 2024.
  148. Gentleman, Amelia (2024-08-15). "Student psychotherapist wins apology over expulsion for gender-critical views". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  149. "Litigation with James Esses". 15 August 2024. Archived from the original on 21 August 2024. Retrieved 21 September 2024.
  150. Sawer, Patrick; Rayner, Gordon (2025-03-01). "Our treatment of gender-critical campaigner was 'unacceptable', police admit". The Daily Telegraph . ISSN   0307-1235. Archived from the original on 11 March 2025. Retrieved 2025-03-11.
  151. "UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex - live updates". BBC News. Retrieved 2025-04-16.
  152. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wang, Hongkun; Zhang, Yihuan; Tang, Ling (2025-11-01). "Indigenizing feminist rage: The affective formation of rad-feminist politics in digital China". International Journal of Cultural Studies. 28 (6): 1062–1081. doi:10.1177/13678779251338317. ISSN   1367-8779.
  153. Wu, Qi (2025). "Exploring postfeminist humor as a collective form of resistance to anti-feminism in China : a textual analysis of radical feminist discourse on Weibo". Digest. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 12 (1): 70–83. doi:10.21825/digest.91541. ISSN   2593-0273.
  154. 1 2 3 4 5 Pan, Zehao (2024). Militant Neoliberalism, or, the Cultural Politics of Chinese Radical Feminism (Thesis). Duke University. Retrieved 15 November 2025.
  155. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jingchao Ma, Chris; Simone Wang, Heng (2025-09-15). "Cyber Trans Panic: Chinese Trans-Antagonistic Feminism and the Transnational Circulation of Transmisogyny on Social Media". Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies. 4 (1–3). doi:10.57814/vn41-fk88. ISSN   2769-2124.
  156. Rose, Kate; Wei Xue, Aviva (2022). Weibo feminism: expression, activism, and social media in China. London ; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN   978-1-350-23150-4.
  157. Lifu, Guo (2024-01-29), Kawasaka, Kazuyoshi; Würrer, Stefan (eds.), "Medals and conspiracies: Chinese and Japanese online trans-exclusionary discourses during the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games", Beyond Diversity: Queer Politics, Activism, and Representation in Contemporary Japan, düsseldorf university press, pp. 117–134, doi:10.1515/9783110767995-010, ISBN   978-3-11-076799-5 , retrieved 2025-11-18
  158. 1 2 Qiao, Leshui (2022-06-01). "Mainland China's TERFs' Misogyny Under JK Rowling's Anti-trans Incident". Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research. Atlantis Press: 1322–1326. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220504.238. ISBN   978-94-6239-580-0.
  159. 1 2 Zheng, Wang; Zhang, Ying (2010). "Global Concepts, Local Practices: Chinese Feminism since the Fourth UN Conference on Women" (PDF). Feminist Studies. 36 (1): 40–70. ISSN   0046-3663.
  160. 1 2 3 4 Tang, Ling (2025-10-16). "Gender-Critical Chinese Feminisms: From Critical Socialism to Post-Utopia". Made in China Journal. Retrieved 2025-11-19.
  161. Jun, Li (2025-02-19). "News Media and the Feminist Movement in China: A Brief History". Made in China Journal. Retrieved 2025-11-19.
  162. Yang, Jessica (2022-06-09). "The Making of "Woman": The Evolution of Chinese State Feminism(s) Under Three Chinese Leaders". Embodied: The Stanford Undergraduate Journal of Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. 1 (1).
  163. Tang, Ling (2025-10-16). "Gender-Critical Chinese Feminisms: From Critical Socialism to Post-Utopia". Made in China Journal. Retrieved 2025-11-08.
  164. 女权学论 (2023-07-19). "Yaya:中国网络女权二十年——从边缘到焦点". 女权学论 (in Simplified Chinese). Retrieved 2025-11-08.
  165. 特丽莎. ""我是激女":生于网络夹缝的"极端女权",和她们与其他女权流派的争议". Wainao (in Chinese (China)). Retrieved 2025-11-08.
  166. Yang, Chun; Zhou, Yongyuan (2023-01-02). "Shifting the struggle inward: Mainstream debate on digital grassroots feminism in China". Asian Journal of Women's Studies. 29 (1): 69–96. doi:10.1080/12259276.2023.2183453. ISSN   1225-9276.
  167. 1 2 Kawasaka, Kazuyoshi (July 2022). "Whose Words are Legitimate? Transgender Rights and Politics of Translation in Japan". ecpr.eu. Retrieved 2025-11-08.
  168. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kawasaka, Kazuyoshi (2023), Goetz, Judith; Mayer, Stefanie (eds.), "Queers and National Anxiety: Discourses on Gender and Sexuality from Anti-Gender Backlash Movements in Japan since the 2000s", Global Perspectives on Anti-Feminism, Far-Right and Religious Attacks on Equality and Diversity, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 182–201, doi:10.3366/jj.7358671.14?seq=13, ISBN   978-1-3995-0539-0 , retrieved 2025-11-15
  169. 1 2 3 4 Akiko, Shimizu (2024-07-10). "Surveillance and Classification: Anti-gender Movements and the Fear of the Invisible in Japan". Critical Asia Archives. Retrieved 2025-11-15.
  170. 1 2 Shimizu, Akiko (2020-03-31). "バックラッシュからオンラインのトランス排除まで ―ペト教授のレクチャーへの応答" [From backlash to online trans exclusion: Response to Professor Peto's lecture]. ジェンダー&セクシュアリティ (in Japanese) (15): 59–66. doi:10.34577/00004700.
  171. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Yamada, Hidenobu (2022-08-01). "GID as an Acceptable Minority; or, The Alliance between Moral Conservatives and "Gender Critical" Feminists in Japan". TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly. 9 (3): 501–506. doi:10.1215/23289252-9836162. ISSN   2328-9252. Archived from the original on 2025-09-02.
  172. 福永, 玄弥 (2022). "フェミニストと保守の奇妙な<連帯>". ジェンダー史学. 18: 75–85. doi:10.11365/genderhistory.18.75.
  173. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Shimizu, Akiko (2020-07-31), "Imported" Feminism and "Indigenous" Queerness: From Backlash to Transphobic Feminism in Transnational Japanese Context (PDF), vol. 23, お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究所, doi:10.24567/00063795 , retrieved 2025-11-15
  174. 1 2 Itani, Satoko (2011-08-03), McGann, Pj; Hutson, David J. (eds.), "Sick but Legitimate? Gender Identity Disorder and a New Gender Identity Category in Japan", Advances in Medical Sociology, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 281–306, doi:10.1108/s1057-6290(2011)0000012017, ISBN   978-0-85724-575-5, Accessible at , retrieved 2025-11-16
  175. Yamada, Hidenobu (July 2020). "トランスジェンダーの普遍化によるGIDをめぐる アンビヴァレンスの抹消" [Erasing Ambivalence Related to Gender Identity Disorder Through the Universalization of Transgender](PDF). ジェンダー研究 : お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究所年報. 23: 47–66. doi:10.24567/00063793. ISSN   1345-0638.
  176. Yoshizawa, Kyosuke (March 2016). "Change in Interpretation of Transgender by Spreading of the Concept of "Gender Identity Disorder"". Gender Studies: Annual Review of the Ochanomizu University Gender Research Institute (ジェンダー研究) (in Japanese). 19. Ochanomizu University Gender Research Institute: 193–202. ISSN   1345-0638.
  177. Shirouzu, Takashi (2024-03-22). "Trans Rights in Japan". Centre for Asian Legal Studies. Retrieved 2025-11-18.
  178. 古怒田, 望人 (2019-03-31). "「性同一性障害特例法」における「セクシュアリティ」の問題" [The issue of "sexuality" in the "Gender Identity Disorder Special Cases Act"]. 年報人間科学. 40: 21–39. doi:10.18910/71610.
  179. Iwagana, Naoko (6 May 2021). "男性の外見のまま女湯に? トランスジェンダーめぐる言説を当事者や専門家が批判「バッシング、看過できない」" [A transgender person in a women's bath with a male appearance?]. Buzzfeed News Japan. Retrieved 17 November 2025.
  180. Kuhn, Anthony (2023-10-25). "Japan's Supreme Court hands down a landmark transgender rights decision". NPR. Retrieved 2025-11-18.
  181. 松岡宗嗣 (2023-11-08). "最高裁、トランスジェンダーの性別変更に「生殖機能なくす手術」は違憲と判断。今後の論点や法改正は?──連載:松岡宗嗣の時事コラム" [The Supreme Court has ruled that "surgery to eliminate reproductive function" for transgender people to change their gender is unconstitutional]. GQ JAPAN (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025-11-18.
  182. "お茶の水女子大「心は女性」のトランスジェンダー学生に門戸 学長「自然な流れ」" [Ochanomizu University welcomes transgender students who identify as women at heart, calling it a "natural progression"]. 高校生新聞オンライン. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 2025-11-15.
  183. Udagawa, Shii (2019-04-28). "教えて、三橋順子さん。 トランスジェンダーへの誤解を解く3つのキーワード〈決定版〉" [Tell me, Junko Mitsuhashi. Three keywords to clear up misunderstandings about transgender people (definitive edition)]. ハフポスト (in Japanese). Archived from the original on 2025-02-10. Retrieved 2025-11-16.
  184. "The Rise of the Trans-Exclusionary Social Movement as Seen From Text Mining Analysis - Voice Up Japan". Voice Up Japan. 2020-07-31. Archived from the original on 2020-08-10. Retrieved 2025-11-18.
  185. Morita, Mariko; Ishimaru, Keiichir (March 2024). "Recent Research Trends on Trans-Exclusionary Feminism/Gender Critical Movement: A Narrative Review Focused on the Analysis of Rhetoric". お茶の水女子大学心理臨床相談センター紀要 (in Japanese). 25. Ochanomizu University Psychological Clinical Consultation Center: 33–46. ISSN   1349-7839.
  186. 堀あきこ. "トランスジェンダーとフェミニズム ツイッターの惨状に対して研究者ができること" [Transgender and Feminism: What Researchers Can Do About the Twitter Disaster]. Women's Action Network. Archived from the original on 2019-02-06. Retrieved 2025-11-15.
  187. Atsuta, Keiko; Iino, Yuriko; Ishida, Hitoshi; Okano, Yayo; Shimizu, Akiko; Taniguchi, Hiroyuki; Hori, Akiko; Maekawa, Naoya; Mitsuhashi, Junko; Yamaguchi, Tomomi; Nagayama, Satoko Yan (1 November 2019). "エッセイ > The Statement "Feminists and scholars of gender and sexuality oppose discrimination against and exclusion of trans women"". Women's Action Network. Archived from the original on 2019-12-15. Retrieved 2025-11-15.
  188. 堀, あきこ (June 2019). "誰をいかなる理由で排除しようとしているのか? ― SNSにおけるトランス女性差別現象から" [Excluding Whom for What? A Look at Transphobia in the Japanese Twittersphere]. 福音と世界 (in Japanese). 74 (6): 42–48. Republished at .
  189. Lee, Sang-Bin (2025-07-03). "A tale of two feminisms: radical vs non-radical translation". The Translator. 31 (3): 270–289. doi:10.1080/13556509.2025.2518760. ISSN   1355-6509.
  190. Würrer, Stefan (2024-01-29), Kawasaka, Kazuyoshi; Würrer, Stefan (eds.), "Transcending the gendered body? Transphobia and the construction of the self in the writing of Shōno Yoriko", Beyond Diversity: Queer Politics, Activism, and Representation in Contemporary Japan, düsseldorf university press, pp. 135–164, doi:10.1515/9783110767995-011, ISBN   978-3-11-076799-5 , retrieved 2025-11-16
  191. "WDI宣言全文と日本語訳|女性スペースを守る会" [Full text of the WDI Declaration and Japanese translation]. note(ノート) (in Japanese). 2022-10-06. Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  192. Grinspan, Mauro Cabral; Eloit, Ilana; Paternotte, David; Verloo, Mieke (2023-12-11). "Exploring TERFnesses". DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies. 10 (2). doi:10.21825/digest.90008. ISSN   2593-0281.
  193. "Timeline: Building a Pseudoscience Network". Southern Poverty Law Center. 2023-12-12. Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  194. Beck, Dorothee; Habed, Adriano José; Henninger, Annette, eds. (2024). Blurring boundaries – ‘anti-gender’ ideology meets feminist and LGBTIQ+ discourses. Opladen Berlin Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. ISBN   978-3-8474-2684-4.
  195. "女性スペース「性暴力」と密接な関係にある…LGBT法案に当事者団体も"待った" | 弁護士JPニュース" [Women's spaces are closely linked to "sexual violence"... LGBT groups also urge a "hold" on the bill]. 弁護士JP|あなたの悩みを解決する弁護士検索サイト (in Japanese). 2023-04-06. Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  196. Frühstück, Sabine (2023-06-17). "Watered-down LGBTQ 'understanding' bill shows how far Japan's parliament is out of step with its society – and history". The Conversation. Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  197. Iida, Mitsuho (28 November 2022). "「女性スペースを守る会」めぐる訴訟" [Lawsuit against "Save Women's Spaces JP"]. 週刊金曜日オンライン (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  198. 1 2 "「悪質トランス差別団体」と指摘された団体の慰謝料請求を認めず 横浜地裁 「女性スペースを守る会」控訴へ:東京新聞デジタル". 東京新聞デジタル (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  199. 産経新聞 (2023-06-21). "LGBT法への不安に応える 自民「女性を守る」議連設立" [LDP launches "Protect Women" coalition to address concerns over LGBT law]. 産経新聞:産経ニュース (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  200. 慎平, 奥原 (2025-05-15). "トイレ、更衣室…女性スペース守る法律を 自民が20日に法案審査へ LGBT法施行で" [LDP to review bill to protect women's spaces in restrooms, changing rooms, etc. on the 20th]. 産経新聞:産経ニュース (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025-11-17.
  201. Kim, Ashley (8 September 2019). "Womad: The New Face of Feminism in Korea?". Berkeley Political Review . Archived from the original on 29 June 2023. Retrieved 2 October 2021.
  202. Bae, Sooyoun (2023-02-01). Discord Between Transgender Women and TERFs in South Korea (PDF). The Asian Conference on Education 2022: Official Conference Proceedings. The International Academic Forum. doi: 10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2023.67 . ISSN   2186-5892. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 29 June 2024.
  203. "Sookmyung Women's University's first transgender student faces discriminations both on and off campus". The Hankyoreh . 2020-02-03. Archived from the original on 29 June 2024. Retrieved 2024-06-29.
  204. Ahn, Sung-mi (2020-02-07). "Transgender student withdraws after getting accepted to Sookmyung Women's University". The Korea Herald . Archived from the original on 28 August 2024. Retrieved 2024-06-29.
  205. Lee, Hyun-Jae (December 2020). "A Critical Study of Identity Politics Based on the Category 'Biological Woman' in the Digital Era: How Young Korean Women Became Transgender Exclusive Radical Feminists". Journal of Asian Sociology. 49 (4): 425–448. doi: 10.21588/dns.2020.49.4.003 . JSTOR   26979894.
  206. Kim, Jinsook (December 2021). "The Resurgence and Popularization of Feminism in South Korea: Key Issues and Challenges for Contemporary Feminist Activism". Korea Journal . 61 (4): 75–101. doi: 10.25024/kj.2021.61.4.75 .
  207. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Özlen, Lara (2020). ""No TERFs On Our TURF:" Building Alliances Through Fractions on Social Media in İstanbul". Kohl: a Journal for Body and Gender Research. 6 (3): 369–386.
  208. 1 2 3 4 5 Boyacı, Denis E.; Boyacıoğlu, Aslıhan Öğün (2023). "Tracing "Gender Critical" Ideology in Turkey: A Study of the Feminist Movement on Sex/Gender in Relation to Trans and Queer Inclusivity". Women's Studies Quarterly. 51 (3/4): 94–112. ISSN   0732-1562.
  209. 1 2 3 4 Tanrıver, Pınar (2022-07-18). The Study of TERF Debate in the Contexts of the US, UK, and Turkey and the Embracement of Intersectional Feminism for a Reconciliation Proposal (Master Thesis thesis). Middle East Technical University.
  210. 1 2 Togay, Semih (2020). Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminism in Turkey: A Historical Overview (Thesis). Istanbul Bilgi University. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  211. Farrere, Michel (1987-05-05). "Turquie Un groupe de travestis fait la grève de la faim à Istanbul" [Türkiye: A group of transvestites are on hunger strike in Istanbul] (in French). Retrieved 2025-11-20.
  212. Sirman, Nükhet (October 1989). "Feminism in Turkey: A Short History". New Perspectives on Turkey. 3: 1–34. doi:10.15184/S0896634600000704. ISSN   0896-6346.
  213. Düzkan, Ayşe (2021-03-07). "sağcılığın yeni şeytanı: lgbti+". Artı Gerçek (in Turkish). Retrieved 2025-11-21.
  214. Şakir, Şükran (2020-11-16). "17 May 1987: March for Solidarity against Battering - Çatlak Zemin". Çatlak Zemin. Archived from the original on 2025-09-08. Retrieved 2025-11-21.
  215. Birdal, Mehmet Sinan (2015-05-15). "Between the Universal and the Particular: The politics of recognition of LGBT rights in Turkey" (PDF). In Lavinas Picq, Manuela; Thiel, Markus (eds.). Sexualities in World Politics: How LGBTQ claims shape International Relations (1 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315743721. ISBN   978-1-315-74372-1.
  216. Gülkan; Aligül (2012). "Transfeminizm" (PDF). In Özdemir, Esen; Bayraktar, Sevi (eds.). İstanbul Amargi Feminizm Tartışmaları. İstanbul: Amargi Yayınevi.
  217. Zengin, Aslı (2016-05-01). "Mortal Life of Trans/Feminism". TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly. 3 (1–2): 266–271. doi:10.1215/23289252-3334487. ISSN   2328-9252.
  218. 1 2 Durmuş, Büşra T. (December 2024). ""Kim Daha Fazla Özne?": Bir Netnografi Çalışması Olarak Feminizmin Halet‑i Ruhiyesi" [“Who Is More of a Subject?”: Feminism’s State of Mind as a Netnography]. In Yolcu, Mehmet Ali; Aca, Mustafa; Kosar, Emel (eds.). Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar Odağında Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları – III [Society and Culture Studies Focused on Contemporary Approaches – III](PDF). İzmir / Istanbul, Turkey: Paradigma Akademi Yayınları. pp. 333–364. ISBN   9786057219084.
  219. "LGBTI+ Dernekleri Trans Dışlayıcı Radikal Feminizmi Kınadı" [LGBTI+ Associations Condemn Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminism]. GZONE (in Turkish). 12 August 2019. Retrieved 2025-11-23.
  220. Durmuş, Büşra Tosun (October 2022). 8 Mart Dünya Kadınlar Günü versus TERF Tartışmaları: #KadınızÖfkeliyiz. Uluslararası Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Sempozyumu.
  221. Merkezi, Haber. "Kadınlar 8 Mart'ta tüm yurtta alanlarda: "Dünyayı yerinden oynatacağız"". dokuz8HABER (in Turkish). Retrieved 2025-11-19.