Chick flick

Last updated

Chick flick is a slang term for the film genre catered specifically to women's interests, and is marketed toward women demographics. They generally tend to appeal more to a younger female audience and deal mainly with love and romance. [1] [2] Although many types of films may be directed toward a female audience, the term "chick flick" is typically used only in reference to films that contain personal drama and emotion or themes that are relationship-based (although not necessarily romantic, as films may focus on parent-child or friend relationships). Chick flicks often are released en masse around Valentine's Day. [3]

Contents

History

The term "chick flick" was not widely used until the 1980s and 1990s. It has its roots in the "women's pictures" of the early twentieth century, which portrays the woman as a victim and housewife, and later the film noir of the 1940s and early 1950s, which portrays the threat of sexualized women. [4] [5] [6] In the 1950s, many women who were in the workforce during World War II faced the transition back into the home. Brandon French notes that the women's films of the 1950s "shed light on a different cluster of issues and situations women faced in their transition from the forties to the sixties: romance, courtship, work, marriage, sex, motherhood, divorce, loneliness, adultery, alcoholism, widowhood, heroism, madness and ambition." [7]

Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961), an early example of the chick flick Audrey Hepburn Tiffany's 4.jpg
Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961), an early example of the chick flick

The film Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961), commonly known as one of the "classic" films from the golden age of cinema, is sometimes considered an early chick flick due to common elements such as dealing with loneliness, obsessive materialism, and happy endings. [8] [9] Author Molly Haskell has suggested that chick flicks are very different from the women's films of the 1940s and 1950s in that they now "sing a different tune." She feels that they are "more defiant and upbeat, post-modern and post-feminist.

In the United States in the 1980s, a succession of teenage drama pictures also labeled as chick flicks were released, many by director John Hughes. These often had a different and more realistic tone than previous chick flicks, with dramatic elements such as abortion and personal alienation being included. [8]

Several chick flicks have been patterned after the story of Cinderella and other fairy tales (e.g. A Cinderella Story (2004), Ever After (1998) and Pretty Woman (1990)), or even Shakespeare in the case of She's the Man (2006) and 10 Things I Hate About You (1999). In addition, a large number are adapted from popular novels (e.g. The Princess Diaries (2001) and The Devil Wears Prada (2006)) and literary classics (e.g. Little Women (1994)). While most films that are considered chick flicks are lighthearted, some suspense films also fall under this category, such as What Lies Beneath (2000).

Evolution & controversy

These works have risen since the 1980s, mostly noticed in the early 2000s, and continued to evolve through the 2010s and early 2020s. In its early development, the films were created as white-female-targeted films, primarily involving white-female characters, topics, and interests. [10]

As the genre developed, there was repetitiveness in the plot and characters of these productions. "Chick flicks" often began with single characters, who soon after unexpectedly meeting a suitable and charming significant other, their lives took a turn for the better. [11]

The first productions of this genre were not initially labeled as "chick flicks"; they were just known as "Girly Films". [12] "What sets it apart from other films geared towards a female is its focus on consumer culture.". [12] Iconic films of the genre such as Clueless (1995), The Princess Diaries (2001), and Mean Girls (2004) act as evidence of such. In all of them, buying feminine clothes, makeup, or shoes is portrayed as a large part of women's identities. Women are often portrayed as overly emotional and dependent on men; reinforcing patriarchal societal expectations that women should prioritize finding a romantic partner and getting married. [11] These expectations can be interpreted from movies such as He’s Just Not That Into You (2009) and The Notebook (2004).

Many believe that the content of this genre in the industry is more inclusive than discriminating. Different varieties of the female protagonist and plot themes are being noted more often. The representation of women in noticeable male-dominated professions and/or positions is seen in films such as Legally Blonde (2001) and The Proposal (2009). There is a broadening of topics the films portray in films such as The Edge of Seventeen (2016) which “explores themes such as loss, grief, and depression, but in a dry, humorous and cutting fashion.”. [13] These films have become a vehicle for other issues in our present society including homophobia and women's rights. [14] This can be seen in films including, but not limited to Love, Simon (2018) and Lady Bird (2017). The industry has evolved the genre from solely portraying soapy romance stories to a focus on more realistic hardships.

There is not doubt that "chick flicks" are misunderstood as simply appealing for audiences of the teen girl persuasion, and not a serious contender for awards and recognitions. [13] Sex and the City (1998–2004) – a "chick flick" series – was nominated for 54 Emmy Awards, 24 Golden Globe Awards, 11 Screen Actors Guild Awards, 10 Directors Guild of America Awards, 7 Satellite Awards, and 4 Producers Guild of America Awards. [15] Additional greatly successful "chick flicks" in the box office are Love Actually (2003), Notting Hill (1999), and Mamma Mia (2008). [16]

Critique of the genre

The term chick flick has generated several negative responses from the modern feminist community. [12] The word chick at the height of the women's liberation movement in the 1970s was considered an insult directed towards women. [17] "Chick" was used to demean women, casting them as childlike, delicate, fluffy creatures in need of protection from men. [17] The affiliation of chick with chick flicks has resulted in an immediate negative response to many women and feminists. [17]

Chick flicks are stuck with many negative stereotypes in which women are typically portrayed as women who are klutzy, sassy, airheaded, etc. When a movie is branded with the title of 'chick flick,' for many it diminishes the credibility of a film, inherently saying that the movie is cheesy, predictable and has a poor plot. [18] This labeling is specifically seen with movies that have subject matters that revolve around women, often reinforcing the idea that themes surrounding women in movies should not be taken seriously. [18] Most criticisms of the genre concentrate on the negative consequences that arise from gendering certain interests, in this case, film. Author of The Chick Flick Paradox: Derogatory? Feminist? or Both? Natalia Thompson states that chick flicks are "an attempt to lump together an entire gender's interests into one genre". [19]

Many critics argue that unnecessary gendering can negatively affect many different social groups. [20] There is evidence from Russian social scientist Natal'ia Rimashevskaia that gender stereotypes further perpetuated by the media can lead to discrimination against women and limit their "human and intellectual potential". [21] More criticisms of the term arise from the actual content of the films in the chick flick genre and how the content affects society's perception of women. Some say that chick flicks are micro-aggressions actions or exchanges that degrade a person based on their membership in a "race, gender, age, and ability". [22]

Film critics take issue with the content most chick flicks have in common. Although the subcategories represent different plotlines, they all share several characteristics. [12] Many chick flicks can have the "ironic, self-deprecating tone" that film theorist Hilary Radner associates with chick lit. This tone is one of the genre's defining characteristics, and she argues that many feel it lacks substance compared with other genres. [12] She says they follow "a set of narrative tropes" which can be seen as "repeated film to film". Radner also goes on to say the genre is "incredibly heteronormative and white-washed". [12] These common characteristics of the genre can lead to criticism from minority groups and social justice activists. [12] It is often visible through the films and their tendency to use typecasting for their roles; because of this, actors such as Reese Witherspoon, Cameron Diaz, Seth Rogen and Sam Claflin fall into the category of "white-washing" the film. More issues with the genre emerge from the opinion that chick flicks play to every woman's "patriarchal unconscious". Radner furthers that claim by saying that it "constitutes a very attractive – and hence often exploited – version of feminine identity". [23]

Some argue against the criticism of chick flicks. Researcher Sarah-Mai Dang acknowledges that the films can be "criticized as threatening backlash to the achievements to feminism"; however she contends that they can be celebrated for their representation of female freedom. [24] Dang further proclaims that it gives space for the female voice to be present or heard in contemporary work like chick flicks. [24]

Diversity of the genre

Chick flicks are often also lumped in with the genre of romantic comedies. This narrows what can or cannot be considered a chick flick, with many people believing that for a film to be considered a chick flick it must have romance and comedy. There are key differences in how a romantic comedy v.s. a chick flick is marketed. A romantic comedy is often produced/marketed with men in mind. However, a chick flick is "a motion picture intended to appeal especially to women." [25]

More recently, women have been wondering why is it that romance is the only thing that is marketed to women, when in fact there are many other themes, topics and issues women could relate to? Due to there not being a "dude-flick" category, many individuals are not asking if there is a need to associate a movie genre to women, and then make them feel guilty for liking it. [18] Others argue that chick flicks have been a continuation of the "chick cultural explosion," which reflected and promoted the new visibility of women in popular culture. Instead, chick flicks were grouped with the product of chick culture and the deliberate decision to address female audiences, meaning that womens significance in contemporary culture was increasing. [17]

The typical narrative in a chick flick of falling in love has now been adapted, and instead there has been an upward trend of including a greater representation of women in chick flicks. Women who instead focus on their professional life, women who reject beauty standards and feminist themes have all been seen in more recent chick flicks. [17] There have also been chick flicks that aim to raise questions about the many choices women must confront such as the possibility of having it all, and the different effects of beauty standards in films such as Bridget Jones's Diary (2001), The Princess Diaries (2001), and In Her Shoes (2005). [17]

There has been little to no emphasis on including individuals from ethnic/racial minorities in chick-flicks. If an individual who is an ethnic/racial minority is cast as a lead role, their co-star will usually not be an ethnic minority. In the movie Hitch where Will Smith was cast as the main male lead, and Eva Mendes was cast as the female lead was a deliberate decision. [26] A black or white woman was not cast in the role, as Will Smith believed that a black couple would have put off audiences worldwide while a interracial couple with a black male lead and white female lead would have offended viewers in the U.S. [26] Casting Eva Mendes was seen as a solution because a Latina female lead and a black male lead was not considered taboo in the U.S. [26] We see this type of casting with many different chick-flicks such as Upgraded (2024) having a Latina female lead and an English male lead. This is an ongoing issue that raises questions about racism and issues of ethnic minority inclusion in the film industry, with much progressing needing to be made in showcases people from ethnic minorities and displating LGBTQ+ relationships. [27]

Examples

The following films have been characterized as chick flicks by some commentators:

See also

Related Research Articles

Feminist science fiction is a subgenre of science fiction focused on such feminist themes as: gender inequality, sexuality, race, economics, reproduction, and environment. Feminist SF is political because of its tendency to critique the dominant culture. Some of the most notable feminist science fiction works have illustrated these themes using utopias to explore a society in which gender differences or gender power imbalances do not exist, or dystopias to explore worlds in which gender inequalities are intensified, thus asserting a need for feminist work to continue.

Science fiction and fantasy serve as important vehicles for feminist thought, particularly as bridges between theory and practice. No other genres so actively invite representations of the ultimate goals of feminism: worlds free of sexism, worlds in which women's contributions are recognized and valued, worlds that explore the diversity of women's desire and sexuality, and worlds that move beyond gender.

Chick lit is a term used to describe a type of popular fiction targeted at women. Widely used in the 1990s and 2000s, the term has fallen out of fashion with publishers, while writers and critics have rejected its inherent sexism. Novels identified as chick lit typically address romantic relationships, female friendships, and workplace struggles in humorous and lighthearted ways. Typical protagonists are urban, heterosexual women in their late twenties and early thirties: the 1990s chick lit heroine represented an evolution of the traditional romantic heroine in her assertiveness, financial independence and enthusiasm for conspicuous consumption.

<i>Maid in Manhattan</i> 2002 film by Wayne Wang

Maid in Manhattan is a 2002 American romantic comedy drama film directed by Wayne Wang and based on a story by John Hughes, who is credited using a pseudonym. It stars Jennifer Lopez, Ralph Fiennes, and Natasha Richardson. In the film, a hotel maid and a high-profile politician fall in love. The film was released on December 13, 2002, by Columbia Pictures and was a box office success, grossing $154 million against its $55 million budget, while receiving mixed reviews.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender bender</span> Person who disrupts expected gender roles

A gender bender is a person who dresses up and presents themselves in a way that defies societal expectations of their gender, especially as the opposite sex. Bending expected gender roles may also be called a genderfuck.

Lipstick feminism is a variety of feminism that seeks to embrace traditional concepts of femininity, including the sexual power of women, alongside traditional feminist ideas. The concept emerged within the third-wave as a response to ideals created by previous movements, where women felt that they could not both be feminine and a feminist.

Gender has been an important theme explored in speculative fiction. The genres that make up speculative fiction, science fiction, fantasy, supernatural fiction, horror, superhero fiction, science fantasy and related genres, have always offered the opportunity for writers to explore social conventions, including gender, gender roles, and beliefs about gender. Like all literary forms, the science fiction genre reflects the popular perceptions of the eras in which individual creators were writing; and those creators' responses to gender stereotypes and gender roles.

Feminist sexology is an offshoot of traditional studies of sexology that focuses on the intersectionality of sex and gender in relation to the sexual lives of women. Sexology has a basis in psychoanalysis, specifically Freudian theory, which played a big role in early sexology. This reactionary field of feminist sexology seeks to be inclusive of experiences of sexuality and break down the problematic ideas that have been expressed by sexology in the past. Feminist sexology shares many principles with the overarching field of sexology; in particular, it does not try to prescribe a certain path or "normality" for women's sexuality, but only observe and note the different and varied ways in which women express their sexuality. It is a young field, but one that is growing rapidly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexuality in music videos</span>

Sexuality in music videos has been evident since the 1980s. Sexuality refers to how people experience and express themselves as sexual beings. Music videos have been an integral part of popular culture and media consumption. From the early days of music on television in the 1980s, to the rise of social media in the 2010s to the present, music videos have used methods to explore sexuality. The concept of objectification vs reclamation of sexuality in music videos reflects tension between exploitation and empowerment, specifically for women and black individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women warriors in literature and culture</span> Archetypal figure

The portrayal of women warriors in literature and popular culture is a subject of study in history, literary studies, film studies, folklore history, and mythology. The archetypal figure of the woman warrior is an example of a normal thing that happens in some cultures, while also being a counter stereotype, opposing the normal construction of war, violence and aggression as masculine. This convention-defying position makes the female warrior a prominent site of investigation for discourses surrounding female power and gender roles in society.

Feminist psychology is a form of psychology centered on social structures and gender. Feminist psychology critiques historical psychological research as done from a male perspective with the view that males are the norm. Feminist psychology is oriented on the values and principles of feminism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Woman's film</span> Film genre

The woman's film is a film genre that includes women-centered narratives, female protagonists and is designed to appeal to a female audience. Woman's films usually portray stereotypical women's concerns such as domestic life, family, motherhood, self-sacrifice, and romance. These films were produced from the silent era through the 1950s and early 1960s, but were most popular in the 1930s and 1940s, reaching their zenith during World War II. Although Hollywood continued to make films characterized by some of the elements of the traditional woman's film in the second half of the 20th century, the term itself disappeared in the 1960s. The work of directors George Cukor, Douglas Sirk, Max Ophüls, and Josef von Sternberg has been associated with the woman's film genre. Joan Crawford, Bette Davis, and Barbara Stanwyck were some of the genre's most prolific stars.

Fairy tale parody is a genre of fiction that parodies traditional fairy tales. The parodies are often created as new literary stories, movies, or television shows.

Neofeminism describes an emerging view of women as becoming empowered through the celebration of attributes perceived to be conventionally feminine, that is, it glorifies a womanly essence over claims to equality with men. It is a term that has come into use in the early 21st century to refer to a popular culture trend, what critics see as a type of "lipstick feminism" that confines women to stereotypical roles, while it erodes cultural freedoms women gained through the second-wave feminism of the 1960s and 1970s in particular.

The strong female character is a stock character, the opposite of the damsel in distress. In the first half of the 20th century, the rise of mainstream feminism and the increased use of the concept in the later 20th century have reduced the concept to a standard item of pop culture fiction. This narrative cliche is separate and distinct from the notion of a female character who is well written, granted some form of agency, and whose actions and desires occupy a central place in the story in a way that is unusual in the history of women in literature and women in film.

Gender plays a role in mass media and is represented within media platforms. These platforms are not limited to film, radio, television, advertisement, social media, and video games. Initiatives and resources exist to promote gender equality and reinforce women's empowerment in the media industry and representations. For example, UNESCO, in cooperation with the International Federation of Journalists, elaborated the Gender-sensitive Indicators for Media contributing to gender equality and women's empowerment in all forms of media.

Norma Bailey is a Canadian film writer, producer, and director whose work is rooted in feminist and intersectional film theory. Bailey has directed several films, both in English and French and in various different genres, including fiction and non-fiction films. Her prolific career within the film industry has awarded her various awards and professional accolades including being named to the Order of Manitoba in 2010.

Feminist children's literature is the writing of children's literature through a feminist lens. Children's literature and women's literature have many similarities. Both often deal with being seen as weak and placed towards the bottom of a hierarchy. In this way feminist ideas are regularly found in the structure of children's literature. Feminist criticism of children's literature is therefore expected, since it is a type of feminist literature. Feminist children's literature has played a critical role for the feminist movement, especially in the past half century. In her book Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics, bell hooks states her belief that all types of media, including writing and children's books, need to promote feminist ideals. She argues "Children's literature is one of the most crucial sites for feminist education for critical consciousness precisely because beliefs and identities are still being formed". The cover of hooks' book, drawn by Laura DeSantis, depicts children alongside adults, showing the importance of the youth. The presence of feminism in children's literature has evolved over the years, but the overall message and goals have remained consistent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in film</span> Women involved in the film industry

Women are involved in the film industry in all roles, including as film directors, actresses, cinematographers, film producers, film critics, and other film industry professions, though women have been underrepresented in creative positions.

The female gaze is a feminist theory term referring to the gaze of the female spectator, character or director of an artistic work, but more than the gender it is an issue of representing women as subjects having agency. As such, people of any gender can create films with a female gaze. It is a response to feminist film theorist Laura Mulvey's term "the male gaze", which represents not only the gaze of a heterosexual male viewer but also the gaze of the male character and the male creator of the film. In that sense it is close, though different, from the Matrixial gaze coined in 1985 by Bracha L. Ettinger. In contemporary usage, the female gaze has been used to refer to the perspective a female filmmaker (screenwriter/director/producer) brings to a film that might be different from a male view of the subject.

Hilary Ann Radner Fox is an American–New Zealand film and media studies academic, and is a professor emerita at the University of Otago. Radner researches representations of gender in visual culture.

References

Notes
  1. ↑ Simpson, John, ed. (2009). Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, on CD-ROM Version 4.0. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-956383-8.
  2. ↑ Stevenson, Angus; Lindberg, Christine A., eds. (2010). New Oxford American Dictionary, Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 300. ISBN   978-0-19-539288-3.
  3. ↑ Kaufman, Amy (February 6, 2013). "'Safe Haven' premiere: Don't call it a 'chick flick,' please" – via LA Times.
  4. ↑ Ferriss, Suzanne and Mallory Young (2008). Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies. New York: Routledge. p. 14.
  5. ↑ Thompson, Natalia M. (January 1, 2007). "The Chick Flick Paradox: Derogatory? Feminist? Or Both?". Off Our Backs. 37 (1): 43–45. JSTOR   20838769.
  6. ↑ Kaplan, E. Ann (1983). Women & Film: Both Sides of the Camera. New York: Methuen, Inc. pp.  6. ISBN   0416317502.
  7. ↑ French, Brandon (1978). On The Verge of Revolt: Women in American Films of the Fifties . New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co. pp. xxii–xxiii. ISBN   0804422206.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Eber, Hailey. "Our Valentine to You and Yours: 10 Chick-Flicks that Don't Totally Suck". ReelzChannel. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved October 2, 2010.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Halpern, Michelle (October 27, 2009). "The Best Chick-Flicks: Then and Now". stylecaster.com. Archived from the original on September 15, 2010. Retrieved September 27, 2010.
  10. ↑ "Postfeminism: The Essential Evolution of Chick Flicks". Arcadia. January 15, 2023. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
  11. 1 2 Sannappanavar, Trisha. "The Notebook of Gender Stereotypes: An Analysis of Chick Flicks". El Estoque. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Radner, Hilary (2011). Neo-feminist cinema: girly films, chick flicks and consumer culture. New York, [New York] London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group. ISBN   978-0-415-87773-2.
  13. 1 2 Soanes, Naomi (February 16, 2018). "How Did the Chick Flick Suddenly Become a Critically Acclaimed Genre?". One Room With A View. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
  14. ↑ Soanes, Naomi (February 16, 2018). "How Did the Chick Flick Suddenly Become a Critically Acclaimed Genre?". One Room With A View. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  15. ↑ "List of awards and nominations received by Sex and the City", Wikipedia, June 6, 2023, retrieved March 5, 2024
  16. ↑ "Top 100 Chick Flicks". IMDb. Retrieved March 5, 2024.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ferriss, Suzanne. "CHICK FLICKS AND CHICK CULTURE".
  18. 1 2 3 Miyazato, Christine (November 16, 2019). "Reasons I Detest the Phrase "Chick Flick"". The ‘F’ Word. Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  19. ↑ Thompson, Natalia M. (2007). "The Chick Flick Paradox: Derogatory? Feminist? Or Both?". Off Our Backs. 37 (1): 43–45. ISSN   0030-0071. JSTOR   20838769.
  20. ↑ Rimashevskaia, Natal'Ia (May 2008). "Gender Stereotypes and the Logic of Social Relations". Russian Social Science Review. 49 (3): 35–48. doi:10.1080/10611428.2008.11065289. ISSN   1061-1428. S2CID   219319923.
  21. ↑ Rimashevskaia, Natal'ia (May 2008). "Gender Stereotypes and the Logic of Social Relations". Russian Social Science Review. 49 (3): 35–48. doi:10.1080/10611428.2008.11065289. ISSN   1061-1428. S2CID   219319923.
  22. ↑ Cousins, Linwood (2014). Encyclopedia of Human Services and Diversity. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781483346663. ISBN   978-1-4522-8748-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  23. ↑ Erens, Patricia, ed. (1990). Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. A Midland Book. Bloomington, Ind. (u.a.): Indiana Univ.-Press. ISBN   978-0-253-31964-7.
  24. 1 2 Dang, Sarah-Mai (2017). Gossip, women, film, and chick flicks. Palgrave pivot. London: palgrave macmillan. ISBN   978-1-137-56017-9.
  25. ↑ "Chick flick – THIS IS GENDERED" . Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  26. 1 2 3 "Was race an issue in 'Hitch' casting?". TODAY.com. February 24, 2005. Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  27. ↑ "Appreciating diversity in romantic comedies".
  28. ↑ "Entertainment". mom.me.
  29. 1 2 3 Samantha (May 31, 2020). "55 Best Chick Flicks Of All Time". Perhaps Maybe Not. Retrieved September 16, 2021.
  30. ↑ "a rare commodity, a military chick-flick". IMDb.com.
  31. ↑ Jacobson, Colin (April 13, 2007). "An Officer and a Gentleman (1982)". dvdmg.com. Retrieved August 22, 2011. Officer manages to be one of those rare films that deftly treads the line between guy movie and "chick-flick".
  32. 1 2 3 4 "Terms of Endearment". New York University: litmed.med.nyu.edu Literature, Arts, and Medicine Database. Retrieved September 30, 2010. Terms of Endearment shares with films Beaches, Steel Magnolias, and One True Thing the popular status of melodramatic 'chick-flick'.
  33. 1 2 Morgan, Kim. "Top 10 Chick-Flicks". MSN.com. Archived from the original on December 3, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cieply, Michael (April 9, 2008). "Wary Hollywood Plans More Chick-Flicks (Hoping to Lure the Guys)". The New York Times . Retrieved October 4, 2010.
  35. ↑ "Top 10 Chick Flicks That Men Secretly Love - Film Junk".
  36. ↑ "just for Graham Hartle, his favourite chick-flick". Archived from the original on August 18, 2012.
  37. ↑ Ellison, Richie. "A chick-flick turned b-movie road adventure". LoveFilm. Archived from the original on April 3, 2012. Retrieved October 26, 2011.
  38. ↑ James Berardinelli (1995). "Waiting to Exhale". reelviews.net. Retrieved October 2, 2010. No doubt about it -- this is a "women's movie" (or, as it's alternatively referred to, a "chick-flick")
  39. ↑ Spindle, Les (August 5, 2009). "The First Wives Club -- Theater Review". The Hollywood Reporter . Retrieved October 2, 2010. The menopausal chick-flick "The First Wives Club" (1996), based on the novel by Olivia Goldsmith, primarily demonstrated that mediocrity needn't preclude boxoffice success
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "'Twilight' is the new breed of chick-flick". MSNBC. November 25, 2008. Archived from the original on December 29, 2010. Retrieved September 27, 2010.
  41. 1 2 3 4 James Berardinelli; Roger Ebert (2005). Reel views 2: the ultimate guide to the best 1,000 modern movies on DVD and video. Justin, Charles & Co. pp.  243, 304, 347–348, 370. ISBN   978-1-932112-40-5.
  42. ↑ St. John, Nina. "10 Best Chick-Flick Quotes". Screen Junkies. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  43. 1 2 3 4 5 "Memorable and Great "Chick" Flicks". Filmsite.org . Retrieved October 26, 2011.
  44. ↑ Boursaw, Jane Louise. "Top 10 Chick Flicks Bridget Jones Diary (2001)". Kaboose. Archived from the original on May 21, 2011. Retrieved August 12, 2013.
  45. ↑ Adeojo, Layomi (October 3, 2020). "More than just a chick flick: Why 'Mean Girls' is a cinematic masterpiece". The Miami Hurricane.
  46. ↑ Beyrer, Bill. "The Notebook - Review". Cinemablend.com . Retrieved October 2, 2010. The Notebook is a chick-flick. Not just any kind of chick-flick, but the kind of chick-flick your parents would like.
  47. ↑ Oloffson, Kristi (May 25, 2010). "Top 10 Worst Chick Flicks". Time . If it were ever possible to cram all the glittering boy-meets-girl, high-school-love-story stereotypes into one movie, A Cinderella Story does it in spades. The 2004 movie stars Hilary Duff, whose father dies in an earthquake, forcing her to work in a diner for her evil stepmother who keeps her from chasing her college dreams. She meets a boy (Chad Michael Murray) online, but he's in the cool crowd and she doesn't fit in (even though she's beautiful and smart). They agree to meet on the school dance floor, where she wears a mask barely covering her eyes so he magically can't tell who she really is (even though you can see her entire face). Duff's performance in the movie snagged her a Razzie nomination in 2005 for Worst Actress. Did anyone expect anything more? TIME takes a look at some other not-so-great films that have been cruelly pitched at female audiences
  48. 1 2 Abramowitz, Rachel (February 14, 2009). "'Chick flicks' are really starting to click". The Los Angeles Times . Retrieved October 4, 2010.
  49. ↑ Mele, Rick. "The Proposal". AskMen.com . Retrieved October 2, 2010. this is a chick-flick so Andrew's choice and what yours might have been aren't necessarily going to match up
  50. ↑ "The Movie Report Archive: June 2009". mrbrownmovies.com. June 19, 2009. Retrieved October 3, 2010. (quote) there is something to be said for such a relentlessly by-the-numbers chick-flick programmer that is nonetheless a breezily enjoyable sit
  51. ↑ "How 50 Shades of Grey mirrors scenes from other popular chick-flicks". tkgnews.com. 2015. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved April 27, 2016.
Bibliography


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.