American eccentric cinema

Last updated
American Eccentric Cinema
Years activeEarly-1990s–present
LocationUnited States
Influences

American eccentric cinema is a mode of contemporary American filmmaking that emerged in what has been termed the metamodern or new sincerity. Its attachment to indie cinema has led some to consider it a movement and genre of cinema in the United States. Its key filmmakers, including Wes Anderson, Charlie Kaufman, and Spike Jonze, are at times referred to as the "American Eccentrics". It occurred during the 1990s and 2000s, when indie directors sought to create films that diverted from the style and content of Hollywood franchise films. [1] American eccentric cinema came in opposition to the mainstream ideas of formulaic narratives [2] and the digitisation within films and new technologies that came about during the time period. [3] American eccentric cinema is marked by films that are "deeply concerned with ethics and morality, the obligations of the individual, the effects of family breakdown, and social alienation." [3]

Contents

Background

American eccentric cinema was critically conceived in response to traditional Hollywood and films of popular culture [1] which often had clear, predictable characters and narratives. American eccentric cinema has been framed as influenced by the new Hollywood era. [1] Both traditions have similar themes and narratives of existentialism and the need for human interaction. [1] New Hollywood focuses on the darker elements of humanity and society within the context of the American Dream in the mid-1960s to the early 1980s. [1] with themes that were reflective of sociocultural issues and were centered around the potential meaninglessness of pursuing the American Dream as generation upon generation motivated to possess it. [1] In comparison, American eccentric cinema does not have a distinct context, its films show characters who are very individual and their concerns are very distinct to their own personalities. [1] American eccentric cinema is considered a shift in contemporary American cinema in the 1990s and 2000s driven by metamodern philosophical and moral beliefs. Far Out Magazine critic Swapnil Dhruv Bose writes that, "As a response to the suffocating excesses of the mainstream, many directors sought to examine the alienation imposed by modernity through fresh perspectives and unconventional methods. Although the creative consciousnesses of the artists vary to a great extent, their works have been collectively labelled as the 'American Eccentric Cinema' movement". [4]

American eccentric cinema is also known as "American smart cinema", [5] a tradition delineated by Jeffrey Sconce and Claire Perkins. Both film traditions consist mostly of American indie films from the 1990s and 2000s and have similar aesthetic strategies, particularly a focus on irony. However, as Kim Wilkins notes, despite the crossovers between the two forms of cinema, American eccentricity "uses irony not primarily for its tonal qualities but, rather, for dramatic and thematic functions". [6]

At a period of American history where postwar communities were growing older, many ideals were being re-evaluated and looked at critically in American eccentric cinema. [3] The genre's films look at emotions and where they come from as well as expectations for what a happy life should be. [3] American eccentric cinema sees happiness as not necessarily being in a domestic life; in a marriage or family. The filmmakers of the genre were influenced by their own lives where their perception of the domestic world could include feelings and emotions of "abandonment, alienation and frustration". [3]

The film tradition also takes influences from postmodernism through the movement's attitudes of irony and sensations of "detachment" to society. [1] But while filmmakers of American eccentric cinema position themselves in a critical manner, they also strive to create significant and unique art forms through various techniques and film features employed. [1]

Films of American eccentric cinema were also made before, during and after the September 11 attacks, when social desires were primarily concerned with being safe and secure. [3] At this time the rights and principles of American liberalism were being challenged and ideas of existentialism were common within art. [3]

Characteristics

While American eccentric cinema films have distinct individual and stylistic visions, they share common themes and textual practices. American eccentric cinema is concerned about an individual's internal dilemmas and existentialism as a human being, regardless of the context. [3] The film techniques of the genre use aspects of mainstream cinema but alter the mainstream conventions slightly through characterisation, tone and style. [3] American eccentric cinema is also known for its use of inter-textual references, quotations and irony. [3] By doing this, an audience's expectation of what may happen is subverted. [3] Filmmakers go into the depth of a protagonist's journey finding their sense of self as the narrative. [3]

American eccentric cinema falls within independent cinema culture . [1] Independent cinema are types of films whose conventions oppose Hollywood mainstream sensibilities [7] with characteristics such as no "forward-moving narrative drive" where the structure is not as ordered or bound by a sense of needed fast pace. [7] Characters in eccentric cinema divert from those in mainstream Hollywood, which are comprehensible [7] with journeys having a distinct beginning, complicated middle and happy ending. "Indie" characters, as well as American eccentric cinema characters, do not necessarily have goals to achieve in the films, or feel defined by them, and a sense of strength of morality may not be as present. [7]

This type of cinema has been called "quirky", "cute" and "smart". [8]

There are many alternate methods of exploring romantic love and sexuality within American eccentric cinema. The films explore gender roles as changing and often take a postfeminist stance. [3] Characters often challenge and explore the expectations of marriage prior to the 1990s within the narrative as well as the complexities of sex and how society views it. [3] Most characters are heterosexual and the complications of love are dealt with from the man-woman relationship perspective. [3] However, director Todd Haynes, whom Swapnil Dhruv Bose labels a pioneer of the American eccentric movement, [9] comes as an exception as he explores LGBT relationships with films that were part of the beginning of the new queer cinema movement. [3] In his 1995 acclaimed drama, Safe , he commented on self-help culture as a metaphor for the AIDS crisis in the late 1980s. [10]

Race is not explored as prevalently within American eccentric films. [3] According to Jesse Fox Mayshark portrayals of characters of a different race, that is, not white, are categorised within a "comic ethnic type". [3] Mayshark perceives lack of diversity as a direct correlation within the genre's directors being primarily white Americans who may think of "other races and cultures" as only outsiders, alien in their comedic nature. [3] Kim Wilkins states that to date the politics and style of American eccentric cinema have been informed by the overwhelmingly white male middle-upper demographic of its key filmmakers. She writes "The focus in American eccentric films (like those in the 'smart' tendency) on 'white male urban sophisticates' situates them as a form of 'men's cinema', in Stella Bruzzi's terms. While neither existential anxiety nor irony is, in reality, the sovereign domain of white men, their cinematic articulation in the key films of the American eccentric mode, such as P.T. Anderson's Magnolia or Punch Drunk Love, David O. Russell's I Heart Huckabees or films by Wes Anderson or Charlie Kaufman, has largely evolved as a form 'grounded in the relationship between, masculinity—its ideology as well as its representation—and aesthetics.' Indeed, many of these films position masculinity as bound to the inability to directly articulate anxiety. Thus, the use of irony in these films—both by characters and through aesthetic and formal strategies—is conveyed as a particularly masculine strategy; a means by which 'ugly' feelings can be repackaged as intellectual gameplay while simultaneously begging to be recognized for what it truly is." [11] She goes on to note that the focus on white, urban, heterosexual men in American eccentric cinema adds to its relationship with neoliberalism: "It cannot be ignored that the protagonists of American Eccentric films are not only male but, on the whole, tend come from socioeconomically privileged backgrounds. The socioeconomic (and gendered) status of these characters situates them as those most likely to succeed within capitalist systems. Unlike indie films within realist modes, such as the neorealist works of Kelly Reichardt or Sean Baker, American Eccentric Cinema does not tend to portray characters at crossroads where decisions made or changing circumstances have the capacity to fundamentally affect their livelihoods, safety, or personal agency. Often the absurd narrative goals of characters are only possible within these films because these characters are not beholden to the financial imperatives that drive more naturalistic characters toward what may be considered more realistic goals." [12]

Politics are explored within the films, through the characters and their journeys. [3] Rather than preaching political messages and creating controversial debates about political issues, they create subtle means to explore politics. [3] Major events such as the September 11 attacks meant that the sense of American uncertainty that was pervading the national was reflected in themes such as self-doubt and insecurity within the characters. [3]

Interpretations on defining the genre

Scholars Kim Wilkins and Jesse Fox Mayshark have written extensively on American eccentric cinema and its place within film genre in their books American Eccentric Cinema [1] and Post-Pop Cinema: The Search for Meaning in New American Film. [3]

Wilkins, a film scholar at the University of Oslo, maintains that American eccentricity is a mode rather than a genre. [13] She demarcates five criteria for the American eccentric mode: "1: The presence of allusion, parody, and intertextuality formally (in terms of genre and meta-cinematic depiction) and playfulness/cinephilia; 2: Sincere thematic underpinnings that are presented at a distance due to the film's perceived 'quirkiness', amusing occurrences, and/or absurd aesthetic; 3: A form of ironic expression that is both reflexive and sincere; 4: Characters and cinematic worlds that are designed to encourage audience alignment despite being clearly constructed; and, above all, 5: Effective and intellectual engagement with an experience of existential anxiety". Wilkins analyses these textual tactics through four analytic lens—genre (with a focus on the road film), characterization, hyper-dialogue, and eccentric worlds. Although Wilkins states that American eccentricity is not an auteurist demarcation, she pays particular attention to the films of Spike Jonze and Wes Anderson. [14] Wilkins explains that there is a distinct relationship between neoliberalism and American eccentric cinema. [1] Neoliberalism is a set of principles proposing "that human well-being can be best advanced by liberating entrepreneurial freedoms and skills". [15] In a neoliberal world, the person will constantly be shifting and altering facets of their life such as expertise and abilities and even their own sense of self to keep up with what is happening within the economy. [16] Within American eccentric films, this idea of neoliberalism aligns to the films' desires to portray individuals as their own selves rather than purely "national or community citizens". [1] Wilkins states that because of this, and individuals not belonging in a community, it provides a foundation for many existential tensions and anxieties that are explored in the films. [1] Thus, she concludes that American eccentric cinema responds to neoliberalism, as well as the existential concerns that were present during the new Hollywood era through means that are presented as ahistoric and primarily concerned with the characters' own experiences rather than broader socio-cultural or political concerns. [1]

Mayshark, an editor at the New York Times, [17] [3] writes on American eccentric cinema filmmakers and analyses specific films within the genre. Mayshark says that the group of filmmakers were not explicitly categorised within any genre at the beginning of the movement because their films were extremely niche and individual, with varying styles and conventions. Their work defied convention and saw a new-found exploration of dark human themes through being idiosyncratic and individual. [3] They wanted the audience to feel like they were a part of the stories and have a "transcendent connection". [3]

As technologies emerge so to have discussions surrounding the expansion of the independent cinema genre and subsequently, American eccentric cinema. In a 1999 keynote address at the Independent Spirit Awards, in California, screenwriter and film producer, James Schamus "voiced the common concern that" commercial and major studios' "empires would ultimately threaten the existence" of independent cinema. [18] "In Schamus' evaluation, independent film is...in decline" however, other commentators see evolution and cultural "transition...to give way to new and different possibilities." [18]

List of notable films

TitleYearDirector
Marie Antoinette [19] 2006 Sofia Coppola
Closer to Home [20] 1995 Joseph Nobile
Bottle Rocket [3] 1996 Wes Anderson
Boogie Nights [3] 1997 Paul Thomas Anderson
Slacker [3] 1990 Richard Linklater
Dazed and Confused [3] 1993
Poison [3] 1991 Todd Haynes
Safe [3] 1995
Spanking the Monkey [3] 1994 David O. Russell
Flirting with Disaster [3] 1996
Being John Malkovich [3] 1999 Spike Jonze
Adaptation [3] 2002
Human Nature [3] 2001 Michel Gondry
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind [3] 2004
Fight Club [3] 1999 David Fincher
Lost in Translation [3] 2003 Sofia Coppola
Donnie Darko [3] 2001 Richard Kelly
Your Friends & Neighbors [3] 1998 Neil LaBute
The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou [3] 2004Wes Anderson
The Squid and the Whale [3] 2005 Noah Baumbach
Citizen Ruth [3] 1996 Alexander Payne
Election [3] 1999
About Schmidt [3] 2002
Sideways [3] 2004
Before Sunrise [3] 1995Richard Linklater
I Heart Huckabees [3] 2004David O. Russell
Waking Life [3] 2001Richard Linklater
Magnolia [3] 1999Paul Thomas Anderson
Velvet Goldmine [3] 1998Todd Haynes
Far From Heaven [3] 2002
Anomalisa [1] 2015 Charlie Kaufman and Duke Johnson
Happiness [18] 1998 Todd Solondz
Very Bad Things [18] 1998 Peter Berg
Storytelling [18] 2001Todd Solondz
Welcome to the Dollhouse [18] 1995
In the Company of Men [18] 1997 Neil LaBute
The Unbelievable Truth [18] 1989 Hal Hartley
Trust [18] 1990
Henry Fool [18] 1997
Simple Men [21] 1992
The Ice Storm [18] 1997 Ang Lee
2 Days in the Valley [22] 1996 John Herzfeld
Rushmore [22] 1998Wes Anderson
The Royal Tenenbaums [22] 2001
The Sweet Hereafter [22] 1997 Atom Egoyan
Punch-Drunk Love [19] 2002Paul Thomas Anderson
The Grand Budapest Hotel [19] 2014Wes Anderson
Damsels in Distress [23] 2011 Whit Stillman
Juno [24] 2007 Jason Reitman
Synecdoche, New York [25] 2008Charlie Kaufman
Lady Bird [26] 2017 Greta Gerwig
The Darjeeling Limited [27] 2007Wes Anderson
Barcelona [28] 1994 Whit Stillman
The Last Days of Disco [18] 1998
The Chumscrubber [18] 2005 Arie Posin
Metropolitan [29] 1990Whit Stillman
The Savages [18] 2007 Tamara Jenkins
Ghost World [18] 2001 Terry Zwigoff
Clerks [30] 1994 Kevin Smith
Palindromes [18] 2004Todd Solondz

List of notable figures

Filmmakers

Actors

Legacy

Rushmore, Slacker and Clerks were each inducted into the National Film Registry. [37]

Three films of Wes Anderson (Grand Budapest Hotel, Royal Tenenbaums and Moonrise Kingdom) alongside Before Sunset, Lost in Translation, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Far From Heaven and Synecdoche, New York were listed on the BBC's 100 Greatest Films of the 21st Century. [38] [39] [40]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Action film</span> Film genre

The action film is a film genre that predominantly features chase sequences, fights, shootouts, explosions, and stunt work. The specifics of what constitutes an action film has been in scholarly debate since the 1980s. While some scholars such as David Bordwell suggested they were films that favor spectacle to storytelling, others such as Geoff King stated they allow the scenes of spectacle to be attuned to storytelling. Action films are often hybrid with other genres, mixing into various forms ranging to comedies, science fiction films, and horror films.

Film style refers to recognizable cinematic techniques used by filmmakers to create specific value in their work. These techniques can include all aspects of film language, including: sound design, mise-en-scène, dialogue, cinematography, editing, or direction.

<i>The Royal Tenenbaums</i> 2001 film by Wes Anderson

The Royal Tenenbaums is a 2001 American comedy-drama film directed by Wes Anderson and co-written with Owen Wilson. It stars Danny Glover, Gene Hackman, Anjelica Huston, Bill Murray, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ben Stiller, Luke Wilson, and Owen Wilson. Ostensibly based on a nonexistent novel, and told with a narrative influenced by the writing of J. D. Salinger, it follows the lives of three gifted siblings who experience great success in youth, and even greater disappointment and failure in adulthood. The children's eccentric father, Royal Tenenbaum (Hackman), leaves them in their adolescent years and returns to them after they have grown, falsely claiming he has a terminal illness. He works on reconciling with his children and ex-wife (Huston).

The crime film is which Nicole Hahn Rafter described as a genre that film scholars have been reluctant to examine "due to complex nature of the topic." While academics and historians such as Carlos Clarens, Thomas Schatz and Thomas Leitch have given interpretations of the genre, Both Rafter and Leitch suggested that it would be impractical to call every film in which a crime produces the central dramatic situation. Various interpretations of the crime film include Clarens describing them as symbolic representations of crime, law and society while Leitch said they present defining subjects as part of a culture which normailzies a place where crime is both shockingly disruptive and also completely normal, while Rafter said the films in the genre are ones that are defined by plots that focus on crime and their consequences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">French New Wave</span> c. 1960s movement in French cinema

The New Wave, also called the French New Wave, is a French art film movement that emerged in the late 1950s. The movement was characterized by its rejection of traditional filmmaking conventions in favor of experimentation and a spirit of iconoclasm. New Wave filmmakers explored new approaches to editing, visual style, and narrative, as well as engagement with the social and political upheavals of the era, often making use of irony or exploring existential themes. The New Wave is often considered one of the most influential movements in the history of cinema.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wes Anderson</span> American filmmaker (born 1969)

Wesley Wales Anderson is an American filmmaker. His films are known for their eccentricity, distinctive visual and narrative styles, and frequent use of ensemble casts. With themes of grief, loss of innocence, and dysfunctional families, critics have cited Anderson as an auteur. Three of his films have appeared in BBC Culture's 2016 poll of the greatest films since 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Art film</span> Film genre

An art film, art cinema, or arthouse film is typically an independent film, aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience. It is "intended to be a serious, artistic work, often experimental and not designed for mass appeal", "made primarily for aesthetic reasons rather than commercial profit", and containing "unconventional or highly symbolic content".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laura Mulvey</span> British feminist film theorist

Laura Mulvey is a British feminist film theorist and filmmaker. She was educated at St Hilda's College, Oxford. She is currently professor of film and media studies at Birkbeck, University of London. She previously taught at Bulmershe College, the London College of Printing, the University of East Anglia, and the British Film Institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adventure film</span> Film genre

The adventure film is a genre of film. The genre is broad. Some early genre studies found it no different than the Western film or argued that adventure could encompass all Hollywood genres. Commonality was found among historians Brian Taves and Ian Cameron in that the genre required a setting that was both remote in time and space to the film audience and that it contained a positive hero who tries to make right in their world. Some critics such as Taves limit the genre to naturalistic settings, while Yvonne Tasker found that would limit films such as Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) from the genre. Tasker found that most films in the genre featured narratives located within a fantasy world of exoticized setting, which are often driven by quests for characters seeking mythical objects or treasure hunting. The genre is closely associated with the action film, and is sometimes used interchangeably or in tandem with that genre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Hollywood</span> American film movement between the mid-1960s and early 1980s

The New Hollywood, Hollywood Renaissance, American New Wave, or New American Cinema, was a movement in American film history from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s, when a new generation of filmmakers came to prominence. They influenced the types of film produced, their production and marketing, and the way major studios approached filmmaking. In New Hollywood films, the film director, rather than the studio, took on a key authorial role.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Road movie</span> Film genre in which the main characters leave home on a road trip

A road movie is a film genre in which the main characters leave home on a road trip, typically altering the perspective from their everyday lives. Road movies often depict travel in the hinterlands, with the films exploring the theme of alienation and examining the tensions and issues of the cultural identity of a nation or historical period; this is all often enmeshed in a mood of actual or potential menace, lawlessness, and violence, a "distinctly existential air" and is populated by restless, "frustrated, often desperate characters". The setting includes not just the close confines of the car as it moves on highways and roads, but also booths in diners and rooms in roadside motels, all of which helps to create intimacy and tension between the characters. Road movies tend to focus on the theme of masculinity, some type of rebellion, car culture, and self-discovery. The core theme of road movies is "rebellion against conservative social norms".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Experimental film</span> Cinematic works that are experimental form or content

Experimental film or avant-garde cinema is a mode of filmmaking that rigorously re-evaluates cinematic conventions and explores non-narrative forms or alternatives to traditional narratives or methods of working. Many experimental films, particularly early ones, relate to arts in other disciplines: painting, dance, literature and poetry, or arise from research and development of new technical resources.

The Golden Age of Mexican Cinema is a boom period in the history of Mexican cinema, which began in 1932 and culminated in 1969. It was characterized by the production of high-quality films that contributed to shaping Mexican national identity and culture. Films such as Luis Buñuel's Los Olvidados illuminated the social realities of Mexico, leaving a profound impact on audiences both within the country and abroad.

Cinéma du look was a French film movement of the 1980s and 1990s, analysed, for the first time, by French critic Raphaël Bassan in La Revue du Cinéma issue no. 449, May 1989, in which he classified Luc Besson, Jean-Jacques Beineix and Leos Carax as directors of the "look".

Postmodernist film is a classification for works that articulate the themes and ideas of postmodernism through the medium of cinema. Some of the goals of postmodernist film are to subvert the mainstream conventions of narrative structure and characterization, and to test the audience's suspension of disbelief. Typically, such films also break down the cultural divide between high and low art and often upend typical portrayals of gender, race, class, genre, and time with the goal of creating something that does not abide by traditional narrative expression.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to film:

Indiewood films are made outside of the Hollywood studio system or traditional arthouse/independent filmmaking system yet managed to be produced, financed and distributed by the two with varying degrees of success and/or failure.

Latin American nations have been producing national LGBT+ cinema since at least the 1980s, though homosexual characters have been appearing in their films since at least 1923.:75 The collection of LGBT-themed films from 2000 onwards has been dubbed New Maricón Cinema by Vinodh Venkatesh; the term both includes Latine culture and identity and does not exclude non-queer LGBT+ films like Azul y no tan rosa.:6-7 Latin American cinema is largely non-systemic, which is established as a reason for its wide variety of LGBT-themed films.:142

Vulgar auteurism is a movement that emerged in early 2010s cinephilia and film criticism associated with championing or reappraising filmmakers, mostly those working in the horror, sci-fi and action genres and whose work has otherwise received little attention or negative reception in the critical mainstream. It became a controversial topic in the cinephile community following the publication of an article in the Village Voice in 2013 and has been described as "a critical movement committed to assessing the 'unserious' artistry of popcorn cinema with absolute seriousness."

Psychological drama, or psychodrama, is a subgenre of drama and psychological fiction literatures that generally focuses upon the emotional, mental, and psychological development of the protagonists and other characters within the narrative, which is highlighted by the drama. It is widely known as one of the main subgenres of psychological fiction; the subgenre is commonly used for films and television series.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Wilkins, Kim. American eccentric cinema. ISBN   978-1-5013-3694-2. OCLC   1090782214.
  2. Wilson, D. Harlan (2010). Walters, James (ed.). "Diegetics of Mainstream Hollywood". Science Fiction Studies. 37 (1): 143–145. ISSN   0091-7729. JSTOR   40649603.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Mayshark, Jesse Fox. (2007). Post-pop cinema : the search for meaning in new American film. Praeger Publishers. ISBN   978-0-313-08141-5. OCLC   231678018.
  4. 1 2 3 10 essential films from the 'American Eccentric Cinema' movement|Far Out Magazine
  5. American Smart Cinema - Claire Elizabeth Perkins - Google Books
  6. American Eccentric Cinema, by Kim Wilkins. Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, 214 pp.
  7. 1 2 3 4 King, Geoff (2005). American independent cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN   0-253-34702-5. OCLC   61455170.
  8. American Eccentric Cinema - Google Books
  9. 15 brilliant LGBTQ+ filmmakers you need to know|Far Out Magazine
  10. Safe (1995)|The Criterion Collection
  11. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema First edition. London ;: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. (page 39).
  12. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema First edition. London ;: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. (page 40)
  13. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019.
  14. Dixon, W.W. "Wilkins, Kim. American eccentric cinema." CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries, vol. 56, no. 11, 2019, p. 1359+. Gale Literature Resource Center, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A593352438/LitRC?u=oslo&sid=LitRC&xid=828be7c7. Accessed 26 May 2021.
  15. Harvey, David (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-153618-2. OCLC   138749545.
  16. Meeuf, Russell (2017-03-28). Rebellious bodies : stardom, citizenship, and the new body politics (First ed.). Austin, TX. ISBN   978-1-4773-1180-6. OCLC   956947588.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. "Jesse Fox Mayshark". Linkedin.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Perkins, Claire (Claire Elizabeth) (2012). American smart cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-0-7486-4654-8. OCLC   827944898.
  19. 1 2 3 Kim Wilkins, American Eccentric Cinema - OpenEdition Journals
  20. Nouveau guide des films - Intégrale
  21. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pgs.127-8).
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Sconce, Jeffrey (2002-12-01). "Irony, nihilism and the new American 'smart' film". Screen. 43 (4): 349–369. doi:10.1093/screen/43.4.349. ISSN   0036-9543.
  23. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.96-7).
  24. 1 2 3 Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.124-5).
  25. 1 2 3 Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.52)
  26. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pgs.189-90).
  27. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.116).
  28. 1 2 Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.148).
  29. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.150).
  30. 1 2 American Smart Cinema by Claire Perkins – Senses of Cinema
  31. All 10 Wes Anderson Films Ranked - Flickside
  32. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.39).
  33. 1 2 Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.39).
  34. 1 2 Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.182).
  35. Wilkins, Kim. American Eccentric Cinema. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2019 (pg.50).
  36. America's 50 best independent movies|AV Club
  37. Brief Descriptions and Expanded Essays of National Film Registry Titles|Library of Congress
  38. The 21st Century's 100 greatest films - BBC Culture
  39. BBC unveils 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century List|Collider
  40. Are These the 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century?|Vanity Fair