Electoral reform in California

Last updated

Electoral reform in California refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the U.S. state of California.

Contents

Ranked-choice voting

In 2002, San Francisco adopted instant-runoff voting in part because of low turnout in its runoff elections. [1] The system is called "Ranked Choice Voting" there. In 2006, Oakland, California passed Measure O, adopting instant runoff voting. [2] In 2006, the city council of Davis voted 3–2 to place a measure on the ballot to recommend use of single transferable vote for city elections; [3] the measure was approved by the electorate. The state legislature approved 12 September 2007 AB 1294 which codifies ranked choice elections in state law and allows general law cities (those without charters) to use these election methods. [4] Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed this bill. [5] In September 2019, the state legislature approved a similar measure, SB 212. [6] Governor Newsom vetoed this bill. [7]

Californians for Electoral Reform is a non-profit organization which promotes the use of ranked choice voting at all levels of government (city, county, state legislature, school boards, etc.).

Allocation of electoral votes

Currently, California's 55 electoral votes are designated to the candidate winning the statewide popular vote.

In 2006, both houses of the California Legislature passed AB 2948, a bill to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and designate California's electoral votes to the ticket winning the popular vote nationwide. Hours before it was scheduled to become law, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it.

The Compact was approved in 2011, signed by Governor Jerry Brown. [8]

Electors by Congressional district

Republicans proposed a rival reform to allocate electoral votes by Congressional district, similarly to Maine and Nebraska. [9] The California Democratic Party calculated that this would likely result in 22 of California's electoral votes going to the Republican candidate in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. [10]

Redistricting

In November 2005, the electorate rejected Proposition 77 which called for a panel of three retired judges to draw boundaries for California's Senate, Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization districts. It had been viewed with suspicion due to its Republican backers. FairVote suggested that independent redistricting would help avoid gerrymandering, but the major reform needed was the replacement of single member districts with multi-member districts. This would make it possible to implement single transferable vote or other proportional representation systems. [11]

In November 2008, voters in California passed Proposition 11 to reform how electoral districts are drawn in the state. The proposition called for a commission of fourteen non-politician voters to draw boundaries for the Senate, Assembly, and Board of Equalization districts. The commission is to be made up of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four commissioners from neither major party. [12]

In November 2010, Proposition 20 was passed, which put the commission in charge of drawing United States House of Representatives districts in California.

Nonpartisan blanket primaries

In the June 2010 elections, voters approved Proposition 14, establishing the nonpartisan blanket primary as the election method for state and federal offices except for local, non-partisan, and presidential elections.

Expansion of the electorate

In California, voting rights are restored to felons automatically after release from prison and discharge from parole. Probationers may vote. [13] Prior to 1978, only persons who had a certified medical excuse, or who could demonstrate that they would be out of town on Election Day, were allowed to vote absentee. Today, any voter may vote absentee. In 2004, State Sen. John Vasconcellos (D-Santa Clara) proposed a youth suffrage constitutional amendment called Training Wheels for Citizenship that would give 14-year-olds a quarter vote, 16-year-olds a half vote, and 17-year-olds a full vote. [14] [15]

In 2012, state lawmakers passed a bill to adopt Election Day voter registration with the law expected to take effect in 2016. [16] [17]

In 2015, California became the second state to pass automatic voter registration with initial implementation expected in the second half of 2016. [18] For context, state officials estimate there are 6.6 million citizens in California who are eligible but not registered to vote. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California State Legislature</span> Legislative branch of the state government of California

The California State Legislature is a bicameral state legislature consisting of a lower house, the California State Assembly, with 80 members; and an upper house, the California State Senate, with 40 members. Both houses of the Legislature convene at the California State Capitol in Sacramento. The California state legislature is one of just ten full-time state legislatures in the United States. The houses are distinguished by the colors of the carpet and trim of each house. The Senate is distinguished by the color red and the Assembly by the color green, inspired by the House of Lords and House of Commons respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FairVote</span> U.S. electoral reform organization

FairVote, formerly the Center for Voting and Democracy, is a 501(c)(3) organization that advocates electoral reform in the United States.

A nonpartisan blanket primary is a primary election in which all candidates for the same elected office run against each other at once, regardless of the political party. Partisan elections are, on the other hand, segregated by political party. Nonpartisan blanket primaries are slightly different from most other elections systems with two rounds/a runoff, also known as "jungle primaries" , in a few ways. The first round of a nonpartisan blanket primary is officially the "primary." Round two is the "general election." Round two must be held, even if one candidate receives a majority in the first round.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Popular Vote Interstate Compact</span> U.S. agreement on presidential elections

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president, and it would come into effect only when it would guarantee that outcome. Introduced in 2006, as of January 2024 it has been adopted by sixteen states and the District of Columbia. These jurisdictions have 205 electoral votes, which is 38% of the Electoral College and 76% of the 270 votes needed to give the compact legal force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in California</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of California

Elections in California are held to fill various local, state and federal seats. In California, regular elections are held every even year ; however, some seats have terms of office that are longer than two years, so not every seat is on the ballot in every election. Special elections may be held to fill vacancies at other points in time. Recall elections can also be held. Additionally, statewide initiatives, legislative referrals and referendums may be on the ballot.

Electoral reform in Virginia refers to efforts to change the electoral system in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia has undergone much electoral change since its settling in 1607, many of which were required by federal legislation. However, it remains a relatively conservative state in this respect compared to California and others which have experimented with various alternative systems.

Electoral reform in the United States refers to efforts to change American elections and the electoral system used in the United States.

Electoral reform in Alaska refers to efforts to change the voting laws in this U.S. state. U.S. Senator John McCain and other Republicans endorsed a referendum to implement Instant Runoff Voting, after the conservative vote split between the Republican candidate and the Alaskan Independence Party candidate, allowing a Democrat to win the governorship. However, the League of Women Voters opposed it, citing the principle of one man, one vote, and the measure was defeated. Another issue is whether Alaska will join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and designate its three electors to the candidate winning the nationwide popular vote, rather than the winner of the state's vote. SB 138, a bill to do just that, was introduced in 2007, but was not approved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in New York</span>

Electoral reform in New York refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws in New York State. In 2021, the New York State Legislature asked members of New York state through means of ballot proposals, all of which were denied by voters.

Electoral reform in Florida refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws in the United States state of Florida.

There have been several efforts at electoral reform in the U.S. state of Washington. In 2006, Pierce County's electorate adopted Amendment 3, voting to switch to instant-runoff voting, a voting system in which voters rank candidates in order of preference. Part of the impetus for this measure was dissatisfaction with the "pick-a-party primary" system. Washington requires 1,000 petition signatures for printed ballot access. Voting rights of felons are restored upon completion of sentence, including prison, parole, and probation. Bills to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and award Washington's 11 electoral votes to the winner of the nationwide popular vote winner were introduced in both houses of the Washington State Legislature in 2007, but they died. The Bill was re-introduced in 2009, passed, and was signed into law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in Colorado</span>

Electoral reform in Colorado refers to efforts to change the voting laws in the Centennial State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranked-choice voting in the United States</span> Electoral system used in some cities and states

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) can refer to one of several ranked voting methods used in some cities and states in the United States. The term is not strictly defined, but most often refers to instant-runoff voting (IRV) or single transferable vote (STV).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 11</span> Ballot measure in California

Proposition 11 of 2008 was a law enacted by California voters that placed the power to draw electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts in a Citizens Redistricting Commission, as opposed to the State Legislature. To do this the Act amended both the Constitution of California and the Government Code. The law was proposed by means of the initiative process and was put to voters as part of the November 4, 2008 state elections. In 2010, voters passed Proposition 20 which extended the Citizen Redistricting Commission's power to draw electoral boundaries to include U.S. House seats as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 California elections</span>

The California state special elections, 2009 were held on May 19, 2009 throughout the state of California. The elections were authorized by the State Legislature and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger as a part of a budget signed into law on February 19, 2009. Voters voted on six ballot propositions, 1A through 1F, for the open 26th State Senate district seat, and in a primary for the open 32nd congressional district seat. All of the propositions except 1F were defeated.

Electoral reform in Oregon refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the West Coast state of Oregon.

A unified primary is an electoral system for narrowing the field of candidates for a single-winner election, similar to a nonpartisan blanket primary, but using approval voting for the first round, advancing the top-two candidates, allowing voters to confirm the majority-supported candidate in the general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redistricting in California</span> Redistricting of Californias districts for the U.S. House of Representatives

Redistricting in California has historically been highly controversial. Critics have accused legislators of attempting to protect themselves from competition by gerrymandering districts. Conflicts between the governor and the legislature during redistricting often have only been resolved by the courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 California elections</span>

In California state elections, 2014 was the first year in which the top statewide offices were elected under the nonpartisan blanket primary, pursuant to Proposition 14, which passed with 53% voter approval in June 2010. Under this system, which first went into effect during the 2012 election year, all candidates appear on the same ballot, regardless of party. In the primary, voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. The top two finishers, regardless of party, then advance to face each other in the general election in November.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California elections</span>

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

References

  1. NYC, meet IRV Archived 2007-11-13 at the Wayback Machine , Clinton Hendler, Sept. 21, 2005.
  2. Oakland Adopts Instant Runoff Voting Archived 2007-06-10 at the Wayback Machine , Davina Attar and Adithya Sambamurthy, UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism, November 7, 2006.
  3. Campaign 2006 and Bringing Instant Runoff Voting to the Tipping Point Archived 2007-06-13 at the Wayback Machine , Rob Richie, November 3, 2006.
  4. AB 1294, An act to add Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10050) to Part 1 of Division 10 of the Elections Code, relating to elections, California Legislature.
  5. "Choice Voting - Davis - LocalWiki".
  6. "Bill Text - SB-212 Elections: local voting methods". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2020-01-18.
  7. "Gavin Newsom vetoes bill to allow ranked-choice voting throughout California". SFChronicle.com. 2019-10-15. Retrieved 2020-01-18.
  8. "Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. – Newsroom". Archived from the original on 2017-12-19. Retrieved 2014-04-02.
  9. California initiative proposed to divvy up electoral votes Archived 2007-10-21 at the Wayback Machine , Scott Shepard, Cox News Service, Aug. 19, 2007.
  10. STOP the Republican "Steal the State" Plot Archived 2007-10-18 at the Wayback Machine , California Democratic Party.
  11. Proposition 77 Fails - But Voters Still Want Reform Archived 2007-07-13 at the Wayback Machine , FairVote.
  12. John Wildermuth (2008-11-27). "Redistricting victory a big win for governor". San Francisco Chronicle . Retrieved 2009-03-16.
  13. Felony Disenfranchisement Laws Archived 2009-06-29 at the Library of Congress Web Archives, Brennan Center.
  14. California Ponders Letting 14-year-olds Vote Archived 2008-02-09 at the Wayback Machine , Robert Longley.
  15. Californians consider granting 14-year-olds the right to vote, Bobby Caina Calvan, Boston Globe, April 25, 2004.
  16. "Brown OKs election-day voter registration for future contests". Los Angeles Times. September 24, 2012. Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  17. "Same-day voter registration law delayed until 2016". CalNewsroom.com. February 5, 2014. Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  18. "Gov. Brown approves automatic voter registration for Californians". Los Angeles Times. October 10, 2015. Retrieved October 10, 2015.
  19. "California Governor Signs Landmark Automatic Registration Bill". Brennan Center for Justice. October 10, 2015. Retrieved October 10, 2015.