New French Extremity

New French Extremity describes a range of French films made at the turn of the 21st century that were considered extreme or transgressive. Films of the New French Extremity are characterized by graphic depictions of violence, especially sexual violence, and explicit sexual imagery. Many non-French films subsequently become associated with this trend.

Terminology

The term 'new French extremity' was first coined by critic James Quandt in 2004 in a critical piece complaining about the violent turn that French filmmaking appeared to have taken in the late 1990s and early 2000s. This article became the first reference for talking about these films: "Bava as much as Bataille, Salò no less than Sade seem the determinants of a cinema suddenly determined to break every taboo, to wade in rivers of viscera and spumes of sperm, to fill each frame with flesh, nubile or gnarled, and subject it to all manner of penetration, mutilation, and defilement." ^[1] However, most critics and scholars use Quandt's claims as a starting point for how not to talk about new extreme films, with his work having assumed something of a 'straw man' status. ^[2] He has been criticised as having a dismissive tone, a reductive amalgamation of a wide variety of quite different films, a nostalgia for the old transgressive films, and unhelpful conflation of films marked by an arthouse style with new French horror, a series of generically-marked horror films. ^{[2] [3] [4]}

Since then, substantial work done on these films has produced a variety of overlapping terms to describe the films mentioned above and others like them: 'New European Extremism', ^[5] 'extreme cinema', ^[6] 'extreme art cinema', ^[7] 'new extremism', ^[2] as well as a 'cinéma du corps', ^[3] the 'unwatchable', ^[8] and 'transgressive art films'. ^[9] The trend is acknowledged to extend beyond the borders of France to Europe, and in some cases further afield, even as French filmmakers dominate any list of new extreme films.

In general, 'extreme' refers both to the kinds of acts depicted in the films, and the manner in which they are depicted. Acts that frequently occur in new extreme films, which are considered extreme, include visible sex (sometimes called unsimulated sex), sexual and sexualised violence, and graphic images of violence. According to Oliver Kenny, visibility, proximity, and duration are the key defining stylistic aspects to the presentation of these acts: they are shown in proximate and visible detail, often in lengthy scenes or in long take, ^[9] although many other scholars have contributed to discussions about what 'extreme' means in contemporary cinema. ^{[6] [7] [10]}

The 'new' in 'new extreme' suggests that these films constitute a new wave, that develops upon a series of 'old' extreme films. While films were rarely described as 'extreme' prior to the 2000s, the 'old' films in question here are mostly violent, politically engaged, films from the 1960s and 1970s. The most commonly cited films as 'older' comparisons to 'new' extreme cinema are Weekend and Salò . ^{[11] [12] [13] [14]}

History

Sex and violence have long been a part of art and literary history so there is much writing that may have had an influence on contemporary cinema. The most commonly discussed literary and artistic reference points for scholars and critics looking at extreme cinema include Marquis de Sade and his many sexual, violent, and sexually violent novels, Gustave Courbet and his painting L'Origine du monde , ^[15] Antonin Artaud’s writing about the Theatre of Cruelty, ^[4] and Georges Bataille's work on erotism and transgression. ^[5] More recently, a trend towards graphic depictions of sex and violence in literature, sometimes under the moniker contemporary extreme has been associated with writers such as Henry Miller, Bret Easton Ellis, Michel Houellebecq, Marie Darrieussecq, Richard Morgiève, Alina Reyes, and others. ^{[16] [17]}

In a cinematic context, it is an established practice to mix supposedly 'low-brow' forms of popular expression with 'high-brow' filmmaking, notably by including sexual and violent imagery in arthouse films. ^{[4] [18]} Art cinema has long been seen as drawing its aesthetics and narrative tropes from forms of eroticism and depictions of the body that transgress mainstream rules such as those of Hollywood. ^{[19] [20]} Indeed many now-canonic French and Italian art films of the 1960s and 1970s were marketed together with exploitation films in the USA because their graphic depiction of nudity was considered to exclude them from the status of art film. ^{[6] [21]}

There is a huge range of experimental filmmaking from Europe and elsewhere that has influenced new extreme films (most notably explored by Tim Palmer). ^[3] Specifically in terms of sexual and violent imagery, 20th-century films that are often considered as precursors to contemporary extreme cinema include Un Chien Andalou (Buñuel & Dalí 1929), Salò, Or the 120 Days of Sodom (Pasolini 1975), The Virgin Spring (Bergman 1960), Belle de Jour (Buñuel 1967), Weekend (Godard, 1967), Straw Dogs (Peckinpah, 1971), The Mother and the Whore (Eustache, 1973), Cannibal Holocaust (Deodato, 1980), Possession (Żuławski, 1981), and A Nos Amours (Pialat, 1983). Tim Palmer also suggests other precursors such as Window Water Baby Moving (Brakhage 1959), Christmas on Earth (Rubin 1963), Flaming Creatures (Smith 1963), and Fuses (Schneeman 1967). ^[3]

The most direct and influential presence looming over contemporary European extremity are the films of Michael Haneke, who may be considered as something of a godfather of new extremity. ^[22] Haneke's films have become very well known for their self-reflective approach to violence – especially The Seventh Continent, 71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance, Benny's Video, Funny Games, Hidden , and The Piano Teacher . Scholars often read these films as explorations of violence and spectatorship: the films' "aesthetic reflexivity is conducive to the spectator's moral reflexivity", ^[23] and they also present cultural-political critiques of society, "it is not just the violence depicted in or by cinematic and other audiovisual images but the violence of conventional cinematic representation that Haneke's films diagnose and criticise". ^[24] Similar analyses will later be made of new extreme films, however, with a few key exceptions, Haneke tends to avoid the direct depiction of violence – whilst his films can be considered extremely violent, there is relatively little on-screen violence, because Haneke considers the ear to be "a more direct route to the imagination". ^[25]

Themes and characteristics

The body

New extreme films are especially known for their intimate and challenging images of bodies, what Tim Palmer has called a 'brutal intimacy' and a 'cinema of the body', films "that deal frankly and graphically with the body, and corporeal transgressions, [...] whose basic agenda is an on-screen interrogation of physicality in brutally intimate terms". ^[26] Palmer describes a cinéma du corps within which he includes many new extreme films (although he does not use this term):

This cinéma du corps consists of arthouse dramas and thrillers with deliberately discomfiting features: dispassionate physical encounters involving filmed sex that is sometimes unsimulated; physical desire embodied by the performances of actors or nonprofessionals as harshly insular; intimacy itself depicted as fundamentally aggressive, devoid of romance, lacking a nurturing instinct or empathy of any kind; and social relationships that disintegrate in the face of such violent compulsions. ^[27]

Rape and sexual assault

A defining characteristics of new extreme films is the spectacular depiction of sexual violence, especially rape, most emblematically, the 10-minute rape scene in the middle of Irreversible, when the camera remains static for most of the scene while Alex (Monica Bellucci) is anally raped and then almost beaten to death by her assailant. Lengthy scenes of rape are also a key feature of A Serbian Film , Irréversible , Baise-moi , Fat Girl , Free Will, Holiday , Romance, The Tribe , and Twentynine Palms . As Dominique Russell notes, "these directors' engagement with rape and its on-screen representation is part of their engagement with art cinema itself", ^[28] and Olivier Joyard contends that "it's unbelievable but it's like this: rape is a trashy, chic experience, a trendy aesthetic loop-the-loop, the dark horizon of modernity'. ^[29]

New extreme films have been very controversial for their sexually violent imagery. As well as issues with censorship and audience walk-outs, scholars regularly critiqued the representation of rape and sexual assault in these films. ^{[9] [28] [30] [31] [32]} One key criticism is the use of rape as an aesthetic element – in order to create shock and exhilaration in the spectator – and subordinated to political or philosophical purposes, rather than being considered as a physical, literal violation. ^[28] Another concerns is how new extreme films exploit the affect and legal ambiguity of rape, creating challenging scenes of sexual violence that are commonly read in terms of their impact on the viewer, rather than in relation to what they have to say about rape in society. ^{[33] [34] [35]}

Women and feminism

Many of the key filmmakers associated with new extreme films are women and have been discussed in terms of their depiction of women: Catherine Breillat, Claire Denis, Virginie Despentes and Coralie Trinh-Thi, Marina de Van and more recently, Julia Ducournau, Coralie Fargeat, Maja Miloš, and Isabella Eklöf. Although some of these female filmmakers have tried to downplay their interest in feminism (e.g. de Van ^[36] ) Breillat and Despentes are important figures in contemporary French discussions around feminism. Work in French studies has explored how films such as Romance, Fat Girl and Anatomy of Hell depicted female sexuality, the construction of femininity, gender identity, and sexual violence. ^{[37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]} Baise-moi has been examined in terms of sexual violence – most notably because of its graphic early rape scene which created significant controversy – female sexuality, and the female gaze. ^{[43] [44] [45]} In My Skin, Raw, Clip, and Holiday have also all been explored in terms of their depiction of female sexual awakening, gendered power relations, sexual violence, and the construction of gender. ^{[9] [46] [47] [48]} Key issues for feminist film studies including sexuality, sexual violence, the gaze, and gender are repeated concerns for new extreme films, especially those directed by women.

National politics

Several new extreme films explore political and historical issues e.g. Battle in Heaven, A Serbian Film , and Taxidermia .

Much analysis of Battle in Heaven reads it in the context of Mexican history and society. ^{[49] [50]} The characters are often understood as representative of a two-class system divided between a lighter-skinned dominant class and a darker-skinned lower class: 'Batalla en el cielo's opening scene juxtaposes the corporeal rigidity and moral deficiency of Marcos's brown male figure, with a sensuous and emotionally layered image of Ana, a phenotypically white Mexican woman'. ^[51] In this reading, the violent and sexual imagery in the film is a cinematic way of making a socio-political critique of Mexican society.

In publicity interviews for A Serbian Film , director Srđan Spasojević, argued that his film "is a diary of our own molestation by the Serbian government. [...] You have to feel the violence to know what it's about". ^[52] Although this argument was frequently ridiculed in the press, and audience research has shown that viewers rarely saw the film as a national allegory unless specifically directed to this reading, ^[53] it is common to read A Serbian Film as a loose allegory of 21st-century Serbian history. ^{[54] [55]} Aida Vidan argues that it "does not directly address war themes, but is a statement on a traumatized society that has lost its voice and identity" ^[56] and Featherstone & Johnson argue that it "exposes the real of Serbian ethno-nationalism to the harsh light of day and makes it entirely dominant over normal symbolic reality". ^[57]

Taxidermia can be read as an allegory of Hungarian history, with its three sections corresponding loosely to fascist, socialist, and capitalist periods in the country's past, and how different members of a family come to terms with this political context. György Kalmár argues that the visceral and affectively challenging imagery in the film is about exploring the specifically local character of Hungarian history: Taxidermia evokes a "culturally specific, local sensorium in order to undermine the ideologically laden grand narratives of a homogenized, official History". ^[58] Similarly Steven Shaviro connects the film's depiction of bodies with broader ideas of history: "these body-images are immediately visceral, and indeed disgusting; and yet they are also abstract and allegorical". ^[59]

Some scholars have compared this concern with national politics with representations of nation in new French horror, sometimes called 'border horror' ^[60] and 'Sarkozy horror' ^[61] by critics. As Alice Haylett Bryan has noted, images of riots in several French horror films are "representative of a much wider political seam that runs through French horror cinema of this period. Initial scholarly writing on these films was quick to position them in relation to French society, providing readings of the films as expressing fears surrounding immigration and the loss of French cultural identity due to the influx of foreign Others". ^[62]

Spectatorship

Some writers who are positive about new extreme films and see ethical or political value in them, see the films deploying an engaged mode of spectatorship. ^{[63] [5] [34] [38] [43]} They suggest that new extreme films are ethically/politically engaged because they aggressively destabilize dominant interpretations of sex and violence, and because they challenge spectators to look at the world differently. ^[64] They argue that the disturbing and uncomfortable experience of watching new extreme films is a means by which the films transform ways of seeing – spectatorship is ethical.

For instance, the depiction of sex in Twentynine Palms has been read as revealing 'alternative, non-pornographic ways of being sexual' and thereby creates a 'productive estrangement' from mainstream and pornographic modes of spectatorship. ^[65] Baise-moi has been read as presenting "a desire that operates subversively alongside rather than outside of the (masculine) imaginary", ^[66] while the films of Catherine Breillat are seen as disrupting "the relations of distance and control, on which viewing has been seen to depend, by her emphasis on the tactile". ^[67] Films such as Irréversible , Fat Girl , Trouble Every Day , A New Life , Antichrist , and The Idiots have all been read in this way by scholars, suggesting that spectatorship itself can be seen as a central thematic concern for new extreme films.

Unclear and problematic political positions

New extreme films do not appear to reflect a unified social or political platform. It is not clear whether they are politically progressive or reactionary, with many critics and scholars disagreeing on the question. Joan Hawkins summarises audience responses to new extreme films, suggesting that, like many critics,

"Quandt cannot decide whether they have more in common with the "épater les bourgeois" spirit of the French Surrealists or with the work of the right-wing anarchist hussards of the 1950s. That is, he cannot determine whether the films of these new cinematic provocateurs align politically with the Left or with the Right, whether they are culturally progressive or reactionary. In a sense, like many of the horror films Robin Wood discusses, they are both and it is perhaps this imbrication — or perhaps dialectic — of liberal and conservative tendencies which makes the films so deeply troubling". ^[68]

Scholars have also frequently pointed to the difficulty of pinning down the political viewpoints because within the films themselves, the different political or philosophical perspectives are not coherent and clearly linked. Writing about Twentynine Palms , Nikolaj Lübecker suggests that "instead of being a rich and multi-layered film, Twentynine Palms is a raw and edgy one. Instead of watching a work in which the three strands [political, physical, metaphysical] organically combine, we experience an implosion of meaning". ^[69] Lübecker suggests that new extreme films are 'doubly transgressive', because they are first transgressive in terms of their challenging sexual and violent imagery, and then subsequently transgressive because this challenge to the spectator does not appear to serve a straightforwardly 'emancipatory agenda'. ^[70]

Some films have also been criticised as politically reactionary. Irreversible has been criticised as "the most homophobic movie ever made", ^[71] Fat Girl and A Serbian Film were cut in the UK for problematic images of child sexual abuse , and A New Life was criticised for its aestheticisation of sexual violence and human trafficking. ^[72] Catherine Breillat is also well-known for her claims about gender such as with the voiceover in Romance saying that "women are capable of much more love than men", while in interviews, Breillat has claimed that "women, they truly love men. I'm not sure that men ever love women". ^[73]

Controversy

Several films associated with the New French Extremity have generated significant controversy upon their premieres, such as Trouble Every Day, Irreversible, and Twentynine Palms which prompting walkouts among audience members. ^[74]

Baise-moi was protested against in France by religious groups, leading to a de facto ban on it by the Culture Minister, a decision that itself was then protested by filmmakers resulting in the introduction of a new '18' certificate to cater just for the film. ^[44] Baise-moi was also subject to controversy in many countries because of its inclusion of visible penetration in an early rape scene – in the UK, this scene was cut by the BBFC until the decision was overturned in 2013. ^[75]

Critical controversy is a key aspect of new extreme films: while individual films are liked more or less by audiences, they have received a huge amount of attention in the press, in cinephile forums, from academics, and on discussion boards. Mattias Frey argues that for extreme cinema, it is less important to look at exactly what reviewers say, "much more decisive is the sheer amount of coverage: the more exposure, whether positive or negative, the more value a film accrues". ^[76] For instance, Irreversible provoked substantial critical debate on its release, with many both praising and criticising the film sometimes even within the same publication: "in journals as diverse as Sight and Sound, in England, and Positif, in France, critics such as Mark Kermode, Nick James, Philippe Rouyer, and Gregory Valens literally sparred in print, damning or acclaiming the qualities of Noe's feature. One faction demanded censure for an amoral treatment of sexual violence; the opposing group called for artistic freedom for an uncompromising portrait of social and sexual dysfunction. Compromise was neither asked for nor given". ^[77]

Censorship

Many new extreme films have been censored around the world. Baise-moi was cut in many countries to remove images of penetration during a rape scene, and a gun being inserted into a man's anus, and was banned elsewhere for its overall pornographic nature. A Serbian Film was banned and cut in many countries for its inclusion of (fictionalised) child sexual abuse imagery. Fat Girl was cut in some jurisdictions because of its final rape scene that appears to show a child accepting and condoning their own rape. ^[30]

Critics called for some films to be banned, calling them immoral, or decrying them as lacking artistry. Baise-moi was criticised for its sexual content and for being of poor quality. ^[45] Irreversible was subject to criticism as 'pornographic' and 'snuff' with the implication that it should not be passed by classification boards. ^{[78] [79]} Graphic sexual imagery, especially those from Breillat in Romance , Anatomy of Hell , and Fat Girl , as well as the mixing of sex and violence in Twentynine Palms and Trouble Every Day was also heavily criticised by critics at the time. ^{[80] [81] [82] [83] [84]}

Relation to new French horror

Contemporary French horror films that have sometimes been associated with the idea of extremity include, Sheitan, Them, High Tension , Frontier(s) , Inside , and Martyrs. ^{[1] [6] [62]} The Belgian, French-language film Calvaire has also been associated with this trend.

Unlike new extreme films, new French horror emphasises gory violence, torture, and monstrous others. There is often an individual or a group who constitutes the violent monster against which the protagonists must struggle, with death and injury following the main characters until the end of the film when they either escape or are defeated by the evil enemy. These films include many horror tropes such as the monstrous or charactered other, the final girl, home invasions, isolated locales, and torture. They are similar to 'torture porn' or 'spectacle horror' films such as like the Saw series and director Eli Roth's Hostel, with Steve Jones identifying Martyrs and Frontier(s) as a form of 'European torture porn', that functions as a response to American depictions of torture. ^[85]

Legacy and influence

Many critics and scholars have prophesied the end of extreme cinema. ^{[86] [87] [10]} There was a high point of production of new extreme films between 1999 and 2010, with waning interest from funding bodies, especially in France for this type of graphic content in the 2010s, ^[88] but several new extreme films were made in the 2010s such as The Tribe, Raw, Climax and Holiday . In the 2020s, there remains significant critical and scholarly interest in extreme cinema with many books and articles still being written about the phenomenon. ^{[9] [89] [90] [91]}

Film examples

Title	Year	Director
A Hole in My Heart	2004	Lukas Moodysson
A New Life	2002	Philippe Grandrieux
A Serbian Film	2010	Srđan Spasojević
Anatomy of Hell	2004	Catherine Breillat
Antichrist	2009	Lars von Trier
Baise-moi	2000	Virginie Despentes and Coralie Trinh-Thi
Battle in Heaven	2005	Carlos Reygadas
Climax	2018	Gaspar Noé
Clip	2012	Maja Miloš
Enter the Void	2009	Gaspar Noé
Fat Girl	2001	Catherine Breillat
Free Will	2006	Matthias Glasner
Holiday	2018	Isabella Eklöf
I Stand Alone	1998	Gaspar Noé
Import/Export	2007	Ulrich Seidl
In My Skin	2002	Marina de Van
Intimacy	2001	Patrice Chéreau
Irréversible	2002	Gaspar Noé
My Mother	2004	Christophe Honoré
Nymphomaniac	2013	Lars von Trier
Pola X	1999	Leos Carax
Raw	2016	Julia Ducournau
Romance	1999	Catherine Breillat
See the Sea	1997	François Ozon
Sombre	1999	Philippe Grandrieux
Taxidermia	2006	György Pálfi
The Brown Bunny	2003	Vincent Gallo
The Great Ecstasy of Robert Carmichael	2005	Thomas Clay
The Idiots	1998	Lars von Trier
The Piano Teacher	2001	Michael Haneke
The Tribe	2014	Myroslav Slaboshpytskiy
Titane	2021	Julia Ducournau
Trouble Every Day	2001	Claire Denis
Twentynine Palms	2003	Bruno Dumont
We Fuck Alone	2006	Gaspar Noé

Sources: ^{[1] [2] [9] [63]}

See also

• Art horror
• Theatre of Cruelty
• Extreme cinema
• Cinema of Transgression

References

Notes

1. Quandt, James (2004). "Flesh and Blood: Sex and Violence in Recent French Cinema". www.artforum.com. Retrieved 2023-02-25.
2. Horeck, Tanya; Kendall, Tina (2011). The New Extremism in Cinema : from France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-0-7486-4709-5. OCLC   751997006.
3. Palmer, Tim (2011). Brutal Intimacy : Analyzing Contemporary French Cinema. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press. ISBN   978-0-8195-7000-0. OCLC   726747537.
4. Beugnet, Martine (2007). Cinema and Sensation : French Film and the Art of Transgression. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-0-7486-2917-6. OCLC   227206613.
5. Kendall, Tina (2011). "Reframing Bataille: On Tacky Spectatorship in the New European Extremism". In Horeck, Tanya; Kendall, Tina (eds.). New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 43–54.
6. Frey, Mattias (2016). Extreme cinema: the transgressive rhetoric of today's art film culture. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. ISBN   978-0-8135-7652-7. OCLC   944961559.
7. Hobbs, Simon (2020). Cultivating extreme art cinema : text, paratext and home video culture. Edinburgh. ISBN   978-1-4744-2738-8. OCLC   1123237714.
8. Grønstad, Asbjørn (2012). Screening the unwatchable : spaces of negation in post-millennial art cinema. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-0-230-24894-6. OCLC   748328772.
9. Kenny, Oliver (2023). Transgressive Art Films: Extremity, Ethics, and Controversial Images of Sex and Violence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   9781474483933.
10. Kerner, Aaron; Knapp, Jonathan (2016). Extreme Cinema : Affective Strategies in Transnational Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-1-4744-0291-0. OCLC   964447318.
11. Goddard, Michael (2011). "Eastern Extreme: The Presentation of Eastern Europe as a Site of Monstrosity in La Vie nouvelle and Import/Export". In Horeck, Tanya; Kendall, Tina (eds.). The New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 82–92.
12. Kimber, Shaun (2014-04-01). "Transgressive edge play and Srpski Film/A Serbian Film" . Horror Studies. 5 (1): 107–125. doi:10.1386/host.5.1.107_1.
13. Birks, Chelsea (2015-04-03). "Body problems: new extremism, Descartes and Jean-Luc Nancy" . New Review of Film and Television Studies. 13 (2): 131–148. doi:10.1080/17400309.2015.1009355. ISSN   1740-0309. S2CID   170868726.
14. Hobbs, Simon (2015-01-02). "Reconceptualising extreme art film as transnational cinema" . Transnational Cinemas. 6 (1): 33–48. doi:10.1080/20403526.2015.1018667. ISSN   2040-3526. S2CID   144725850.
15. Wilson, Emma (2015). "Catherine Breillat and Gustave Courbet's 'The Origin of the World' ['L'Origine du monde'] (1866)". In Piotrowska, Agnieszka (ed.). Embodied encounters: new approaches to psychoanalysis and cinema. London; New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 11–21.
16. Hemmens, Alasdair; Williams, Russell (2012). Autour de l'extrême littéraire. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN   978-1-4438-4429-1. OCLC   840114183.
17. Durand, Alain-Philippe; Mandel, Naomi, eds. (2006). Novels of the contemporary extreme. London: Continuum. ISBN   978-1-84714-039-5. OCLC   298788200.
18. Fisher, John (2001). "High art versus low art". In Gaut, Berys; Lopes, Dominic (eds.). The Routledge companion to aesthetics. London; New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 409–422.
19. Bordwell, David (1979). "The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice". Film Criticism. 4 (1): 56–64. ISSN   0163-5069. JSTOR   44018650.
20. Neale, S. (1981-05-01). "Art Cinema as Institution" . Screen. 22 (1): 11–40. doi:10.1093/screen/22.1.11. ISSN   0036-9543.
21. Lev, Peter (2000). American films of the '70s : conflicting visions. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. ISBN   0-292-79837-7. OCLC   55889987.
22. The cinema of Michael Haneke : Europe utopia. Ben McCann, David Sorfa. London: Wallflower Press. 2011. p. 2. ISBN   978-0-231-50465-2. OCLC   802040823.
23. Wheatley, Catherine (2009). Michael Haneke's cinema : the ethic of the image. New York: Berghahn Books. p. 5. ISBN   978-1-84545-557-6. OCLC   225874698.
24. Sinnerbrink, Robert (2011). "A Post-Humanist Moralist: michael haneke's cinematic critique" . Angelaki . 16 (4): 117. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2011.641350. ISSN   0969-725X. S2CID   141946261.
25. Haneke, Michael (1994). "Notizen zum Film". Stadtkino. 255.
26. Palmer 2011, p. 57-58.
27. Palmer 2011, p. 57.
28. Russell, Dominique, ed. (2010). Rape in art cinema. Dominique Russell. New York: Continuum. p. 3. ISBN   978-1-4411-7379-9. OCLC   741690176.
29. Joyard, Olivier (2002). "Sexe: La prochaine frontière du cinéma". Cahiers du cinéma. 574. quotation translated by Oliver Kenny: 10–12.
30. Keesey, Douglas (2010). "Split identification: Representations of rape in Gaspar Noé's Irréversible and Catherine Breillat's A ma soeur!/Fat Girl" . Studies in European Cinema. 7 (2): 95–107. doi:10.1386/seci.7.2.95_1 (inactive 1 July 2025). ISSN   1741-1548. S2CID   8551632.
31. Koch, Angela (2015). Ir/reversible Bilder zur Visualisierung und Medialisierung von sexueller Gewalt[Ir/reversible images for the visualization and mediatization of sexual violence]. Berlin. ISBN   978-3-940384-72-0. OCLC   899147225.
32. Young, Alison (2010). The scene of violence : cinema, crime, affect. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish. ISBN   978-0-203-88079-1. OCLC   502240452.
33. Brinkema, Eugenie (2004). "Irréversible: A review". Scope.
34. Scott, Kathleen (2014). "Bearing Witness to the Unbearable: Ethics and the Phallic Gaze in Irréversible". In Padva, Gilad; Bukhṿaits, Nurit (eds.). Sensational pleasures in cinema, literature and visual culture : the phallic eye. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 74–87. ISBN   978-1-137-36363-3. OCLC   864093157.
35. Kenny 2023.
36. Palmer 2011, p. 78-88.
37. Wilson, Emma (2001). "Deforming Femininity: Catherine Breillat's Romance". In Mazdon, Lucy (ed.). France on film : reflections on popular French cinema. London: Wallflower. pp. 145–157. ISBN   1-903364-11-6. OCLC   44693597.
38. Phillips, John (2001). "Catherine Breillat's Romance : Hard Core and the Female Gaze" . Studies in French Cinema. 1 (3): 133–140. doi:10.1386/sfci.1.3.133. ISSN   1471-5880. S2CID   191598293.
39. Krisjansen, Ivan; Maddock, Trevor (2001). "Educating Eros: Catherine Breillat's Romance as a Cinematic Solution to Sade's Metaphysical Problem" . Studies in French Cinema. 1 (3): 141–149. doi:10.1386/sfci.1.3.141. ISSN   1471-5880. S2CID   170680419.
40. Gorton, Kristyn (2007-08-17). ""The Point of View of Shame": Re-viewing female desire in Catherine Breillat's Romance (1999) and Anatomy of Hell (2004)?" . Studies in European Cinema. 4 (2): 111–124. doi:10.1386/seci.4.2.111_1 (inactive 1 July 2025). ISSN   1741-1548. S2CID   145699112.
41. Mtshali, Marya T.; Fahs, Breanne (2014-04-03). "Catherine Breillat's Romance and Anatomy of Hell : Subjectivity and the Gendering of Sexuality" . Women: A Cultural Review. 25 (2): 160–175. doi:10.1080/09574042.2014.944415. ISSN   0957-4042. S2CID   73616882.
42. Grønstad, Asbjørn (2007-02-09). "Abject desire: Anatomie de l'enfer and the unwatchable" . Studies in French Cinema. 6 (3): 161–169. doi:10.1386/sfci.6.3.161_1. ISSN   1471-5880. S2CID   191568755.
43. Downing, Lisa (2006). "Baise-moi or the Ethics of the Desiring Gaze" . Nottingham French Studies. 45 (3): 52–65. doi:10.3366/nfs.2006-3.005. ISSN   0029-4586.
44. MacKenzie, Scott (2002). "Baise-moi, feminist cinemas and the censorship controversy" . Screen. 43 (3): 315–324. doi:10.1093/screen/43.3.315.
45. Forrest, Amy E (2013). "Disciplining Deviant Women: The Critical Reception of Baise-Moi". Gender Forum. 46.
46. Lowenstein, Adam (2015). "Feminine Horror: The Embodied Surrealism of In My Skin". In Grant, Barry Keith (ed.). The dread of difference : gender and the horror film (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. pp. 470–487. ISBN   978-1-4773-0241-5. OCLC   903965601.
47. Tarr, Carrie (2006). "Director's Cuts: The Aesthetics of Self-Harming in Marina de Van's Dans ma peau". Nottingham French Studies. 45 (3): 78–91. doi:10.3366/nfs.2006-3.007.
48. De Leeuw, Ursula (2020-01-30). "'A kiss is the beginning of cannibalism': Julia Ducournau's Raw and Bataillean Horror". Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal. 7 (2): 215–228. doi: 10.31273/eirj.v7i2.463 . ISSN   2053-9665. S2CID   214345002.
49. Lahr-Vivaz, Elena (2016). Mexican melodrama : film and nation from the Golden Age to the new wave. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press. ISBN   978-0-8165-3454-8. OCLC   957138213.
50. Ordóñez, Samanta (2017-03-01). "Carlos Reygadas' Batalla en el cielo/Battle in Heaven (2005): Disarticulating the brown male body from myths of Mexican masculinity" . Studies in Spanish & Latin-American Cinemas. 14 (1): 77–94. doi:10.1386/slac.14.1.77_1. ISSN   2050-4837.
51. Ordóñez 2017, p. 84.
52. Kohn, Eric (2010-03-15). "A Serbian Film Shocks Midnight Audiences At SXSW". The Wall Street Journal.
53. Kapka, Alexandra (2014). "Understanding A Serbian Film: The Effects of Censorship and File-sharing on Critical Reception and Perceptions of Serbian National Identity in the UK". Frames Cinema Journal. 6.
54. Herron, Adam (2018-12-01). ""Victim Sells": The Commercial Context of Snuff Fiction and A Serbian Film" . Film Matters. 9 (3): 28–41. doi:10.1386/fm.9.3.28_1. ISSN   2042-1869. S2CID   150540377.
55. Ognjanović, Dejan (2017). "No Escape from the Body: Bleak Landscapes of Serbian horror film" (PDF). Humanistika. 1: 49–66.
56. Vidan, Aida (2011). "Spaces of ideology in South Slavic films" . Studies in Eastern European Cinema. 2 (2): 173–192, p.187. doi:10.1386/seec.2.2.173_1. ISSN   2040-350X. S2CID   143883050.
57. Featherstone, Mark; Johnson, Beth (2012). ""Ovo Je Srbija": The Horror of the National Thing in A Serbian Film" . Journal for Cultural Research. 16 (1): 63–79, p.66. doi:10.1080/14797585.2011.633837. ISSN   1479-7585. S2CID   144969848.
58. Kalmár, György (2014-09-01). "Local Sensorium, Local Cinema: György Pálfi's Sensuous Body Politics". Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies. 8 (1): 203–214, p.203. doi: 10.2478/ausfm-2014-0034 . hdl: 2437/290715 . ISSN   2066-7779. S2CID   56225561.
59. Shaviro, Steven (2012). "Body Horror and Post-Socialist Cinema: György Pálfi's Taxidermia" (PDF). p. 11. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
60. Olivier, Marc (2016). "Border Horror: A Review of Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury's A L'intérieur". Lingua Romana. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
61. Young, Neil (30 April 2008). "Triblinz". Neil Young's Film Lounge. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
62. Haylett Bryan, Alice (2021). "Inhospitable landscapes: contemporary French horror cinema, immigration and identity". French Screen Studies. 21 (3): 224–238, p.225. doi: 10.1080/26438941.2021.1891809 . ISSN   2643-8941. S2CID   236780246.
63. Brown, William (2013). "Violence in Extreme Cinema and the Ethics of Spectatorship". Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind. 7 (1): 25–42. doi:10.3167/PROJ.2013.070104.
64. Bordun, Troy (2017). Genre trouble and extreme cinema : film theory at the fringes of contemporary art cinema. Cham, Switzerland. pp. 1–4. ISBN   978-3-319-65894-0. OCLC   1012344333.
65. Grønstad 2012, p. 82.
66. Downing 2006, p. 59.
67. Wilson 2001, p. 151.
68. Hawkins, Joan (2009). "Culture Wars: Some new trends in art horror". Jump Cut. 51: note 23.
69. Lübecker, Nikolaj (2015). The feel-bad film. Edinburgh. pp. 117–118. ISBN   978-0-7486-9798-4. OCLC   919316043.
70. Lübecker 2015, p. 124.
71. Edelstein, David (2003). "Irreversible Errors: Gaspar Noé's Cinematic Rape". Slate Movies.
72. Hainge, Greg (2008). "L'Invention du Troisième Peuple: The Utopian vision of Philippe Grandrieux's dystopias". In West-Sooby, John (ed.). Nowhere is perfect: French and Francophone utopias/dystopias. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press. pp. 228–239. ISBN   978-0-87413-048-5.
73. Breillat, Catherine (2006). Corps amoureux (in French). interviewed by Claire Vassé. Paris: Denoël. p. 76. ISBN   2-207-25719-3. OCLC   73800656.
74. Palmer, Tim (2006). "Style and Sensation in the Contemporary French Cinema of the Body". Journal of Film and Video. 58 (3): 22–32, p.27. ISSN   0742-4671. JSTOR   20688527.
75. BBFC (2020-08-14). "Baise-moi". www.bbfc.co.uk. Retrieved 2024-02-07.
76. Frey 2016, p. 48.
77. Palmer 2006, p. 27.
78. Felperin, Leslie (2003). "Reviews: Irreversible". Sight and Sound. 13 (3): 46–48.
79. Paris, Barry (2003-04-11). "'Irreversible' gives new meaning to sick and repulsive". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. p. 18. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
80. Tesson, Charles (2001). "Souverain poncif: A ma sœur! de Catherine Breillat". Cahiers du cinéma (in French). 555: 81–82.
81. Baumgarten, Marjorie (2002-07-26). "Trouble Every Day". Austin Chronicle.
82. Burr, Ty (2004-10-01). "Breillat's graphic 'Anatomy' is shockingly theoretical". The Boston Globe.
83. Levy, Emanuel (2011-06-15). "Twentynine Palms (aka 29 Palms): Bruno Dumont's Violent Art Film". EmanuelLevy.com.
84. Walker, Alexander (2012-04-10). "No real bite". Evening Standard.
85. Jones, Steve (2013). Torture Porn : Popular Horror after Saw. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-230-31941-7. OCLC   834978360.
86. Quandt, James (2011). "More Moralism from That 'Wordy Fuck'". In Horeck, Tanya; Kendall, Tina (eds.). New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 209–213.
87. Bordun, Troy (2017). "The End of Extreme Cinema Studies". Canadian Review of Comparative Literature. 44 (1): 122–136. doi: 10.1353/crc.2017.0008 . ISSN   1913-9659. S2CID   194654849.
88. Based on comments made by Christophe Honoré at the London Film Festival in 2014 at the premiere of his film Métamorphoses.
89. Birks, Chelsea (2021). Limit cinema : transgression and the nonhuman in contemporary global film. New York, NY. ISBN   978-1-5013-5288-1. OCLC   1238133886.
90. Batori, Anna (2023). The Extreme Cinema of Eastern Europe Rape, Art, (S)Exploitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-1-4744-4832-1.
91. Sacco, Daniel (2023). Film Regulation in a Cultural Context. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-1-4744-8238-7.

Further reading

• Barker, Martin. et al. (2007) Audiences And Receptions Of Sexual Violence In Contemporary Cinema. Aberystwyth: University of Wales.
• Barker, Martin. (2010) '"Typically French"?: Mediating Screened Rape to British Audiences', in Dominique Russell (ed.) Rape in art cinema. New York, NY: Continuum, pp. 147–158.
• Batori, Anna. (2023) The Extreme Cinema of Eastern Europe Rape, Art, (S)Exploitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Beugnet, Martine. (2007) Cinema and sensation: French film and the art of transgression. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Downing, Lisa. (2004) 'French Cinema's New "Sexual Revolution": Postmodern Porn and Troubled Genre', French Cultural Studies, 15(3), pp. 265–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009715580401500305.
• Frey, Mattias. (2016) Extreme Cinema: The Transgressive Rhetoric of Today's Art Film Culture. London: Rutgers University Press.
• Grønstad, Asbjørn. (2012) Screening the unwatchable: spaces of negation in post-millennial art cinema. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hobbs, Simon. (2018) Cultivating Extreme Art Cinema: Text, Paratext and Home Video Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Horeck, Tanya. and Kendall, Tina. (eds) (2011) The New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Kenny, Oliver. (2023) Transgressive Art Films: Extremity, Ethics, and Controversial Images of Sex and Violence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Kerner, Aaaron. and Knapp, Jonathan. (2016) Extreme Cinema: Affective Strategies in Transnational Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Palmer, Tim. (2011) Brutal intimacy: analyzing contemporary French cinema. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press (Wesleyan film).
• Pett, Emma. (2015) 'A new media landscape? The BBFC, extreme cinema as cult, and technological change', New Review of Film and Television Studies, 13(1), pp. 83–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2014.982910.
• Sacco, Daniel. (2023) Film Regulation in a Cultural Context. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Selfe, Melanie. (2010) '"Incredibly French"?: Nation as an Interpretative Context for Extreme Cinema', in Lucy Mazdon and Catherine Wheatley (eds) Je t'aime... moi non plus: Franco-British cinematic relations. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 153–167.
• Tarr, Carrie. (2010) 'Mutilating and Mutilated Bodies: Women's Takes on "Extreme" French Cinema', in Flavia Laviosa (ed.) Visions of struggle in women's filmmaking in the Mediterranean. 1st ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–80.