A member of Traquairaspidiformes belonging to the family Traquairaspididae. Genus includes new species A. lacruma. The generic name is shared with Anomalaspis Brennan (1952).[3]
A member of Heterostraci belonging to the group Cyathaspidiformes; the type genus of the new family Jarvikaspididae. Genus includes new species J. arctica and J. mauryensis.
A member of Heterostraci belonging to the group Weigeltaspidiformes and the family Weigeltaspididae. Genus includes new species O. magnijubata and O. loefflerae.
A member of Heterostraci belonging to the group Weigeltaspidiformes; the type genus of the new family Toraspididae. Genus includes new species T. somersetensis.
A member of Eugaleaspidiformes; the anatomy of its articulated remains indicates that galeaspids possessed three unpaired dorsal fins, an approximately symmetrical hypochordal tail and a pair of continuous ventrolateral fins. The type species is T. vividus.
A member of Heterostraci belonging to the group Corvaspidiformes; the type genus of the new family Westollaspididae. Genus includes new species W. hyperborea, W. cordata and W. gigas.
A member of Eugaleaspidiformes. Genus includes new species Y. littoralis.
Jawless vertebrate research
A study on the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of lampreys is published by Brownstein & Near (2022), who find Mesomyzon mengae to be a member of the lamprey crown group, and argue that living lamprey biodiversity results from diversifications extending from the Cretaceous to present, rather than gradually accumulating since the Paleozoic.[8]
Meng et al. (2022) describe new fossil material of Pterogonaspis yuhaii from the Devonian Xujiachong Formation (Yunnan, China), providing new information on the cranial anatomy of this galeaspid, including the first fossil evidence for the position of the esophagus in galeaspids.[10]
The first detailed description of the complex of external endolymphatic structures in headshields of members of the genus Tremataspis from the Silurian of Estonia, with tiny platelets located within the openings of the endolymphatic duct and possibly functioning as a sieve that allowed or prevented material from entering the inner ear, is published by Märss, Wilson & Viljus (2022).[11]
A study on the morphology and function of the antiarch jaw apparatus is published by Lebedev et al. (2022).[14]
Wang & Zhu (2022) describe the squamation and scale morphology of Parayunnanolepis xitunensis, recognize at least thirteen morphotypes of scales in P. xitunensis, and interpret their findings as indicative of the high regionalization of squamation at the root of jawed vertebrates.[15]
Zhu et al. (2022) redescribe the pelvic region of the holotype of Parayunnanolepis xitunensis, and report that, instead of having two large plates previously designated as dermal pelvic girdles, P. xitunensis had three pairs of lateral pelvic plates and one large oval median pelvic plate.[16]
Trinajsticet al. (2022) report preservation of a three-dimensionally mineralized heart, thick-walled stomach and bilobed liver from members of Arthrodira from the Devonian Gogo Formation (Australia), and interpret this finding as indicative of the presence of a flat S-shaped heart separated from the liver and other abdominal organs, and of the absence of lungs in members of Arthrodira;[17] subsequently Jensen et al. (2023) question evidence of the presence of a chambered heart in the studied fossil material presented by Trinajstic et al. (2022).[18][19]
A probable relative of climatiid "acanthodians". The type species is F. renovata.
Acanthodian research
A study aiming to quantify the completeness of the acanthodian fossil record is published by Schnetz et al. (2022).[21]
A study on the biomechanical properties and likely function of bony spines in front of the fins of members of the genus Machaeracanthus is published by Ferrón et al. (2022).[22]
Revision of the fossil material originally attributed to Bibractopiscis niger and Orthacanthus commailli, and a study on the implications of these fossils for the knowledge of the evolution of neurocranium in "ctenacanthiforms" and xenacanthiforms, is published by Luccisano et al. (2022).[36]
A study on the evolutionary history of members of the genus Orthacanthus from France and on their relationships with the other European species is published by Luccisano et al. (2022).[37]
Greif, Ferrón & Klug (2022) describe the first known fossil cartilage remains from the Devonian Hangenberg black shale from the Moroccan Anti-Atlas, and interpret its morphology as suggestive of ctenacanth affiliation.[38]
Taxonomic reassessment of a hybodontiform dental assemblage from the lower Kimmeridgian of Czarnogłowy (Poland), and a study on the implications of this assemblage for the knowledge of ecology and biogeography of cartilaginous fishes prior to the Jurassic/Cretaceous transition, is published by Stumpf, Meng & Kriwet (2022)[39]
Fossil teeth of sharks belonging to the groups Hexanchiformes, Echinorhiniformes, Squaliformes and Lamniformes, including the first record of Protosqualus in northwestern Pacific reported to date, are described from the Upper Cretaceous Nishichirashinai and Omagari formations (Yezo Group, Japan) by Kanno et al. (2022).[40]
New fossil material of Xampylodon dentatus, including more complete teeth or specimens representing teeth of different positions than most previous records, and the oldest fossil material of Rolfodon tatere reported to date is described from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) of James Ross Island (Antarctica) by dos Santos et al. (2022).[41]
Feichtinger et al. (2022) describe isolated teeth of Protoxynotus misburgensis from the Santonian of Lebanon, representing the first known record of this species from the southern Tethyan Realm, and interpret this finding as indicating that Protoxynotus and Cretascymnus occupied overlapping or similar habitats during the Late Cretaceous.[42]
Herraiz et al. (2022) describe teeth of a member of the genus Trigonognathus from the El Ferriol outcrop (Miocene of Spain), representing the first known record of this genus from the Mediterranean realm.[43]
A study on the anatomy, growth and ecology of Cretodus crassidens, based on data from a specimen from the Turonian "Lastame" lithofacies of the Scaglia Rossa Veneta (Lessini Mountains, Veneto, northeastern Italy), is published by Amalfitano et al. (2022).[45]
A tooth of Cetorhinus huddlestoni, as well as gill rakers differing from previously described cetorhinids and referred to the same species as the tooth, are described from the Miocene Duho Formation (South Korea) by Malyshkina, Nam & Kwon (2022).[46]
A study aiming to determine whether the observed body forms of lamniform sharks are influenced by thermophysiology, and reevaluating the body form of Otodus megalodon proposed by Cooper et al. (2020),[47] is published by Sternes, Wood & Shimada (2022).[48]
A study on the putative nursery areas and body size patterns across different populations of Otodus megalodon is published by Shimada et al. (2022), who report that specimens of O. megalodon are on average larger in cooler water than those in warmer water, and argue that the previously identified nursery areas may reflect temperature-dependent trends rather than the inferred reproductive strategy.[49]
McCormack et al. (2022) demonstrate the use of zinc isotopes to assess the trophic level in extant and extinct sharks, and interpret their findings as indicative of dietary shifts throughout the Neogene in sharks belonging to the genera Otodus and Carcharodon, and indicating that Early Pliocene sympatricgreat white sharks and Otodus megalodon likely occupied a similar mean trophic level.[50]
Evidence from nitrogen isotope ratios in fossil teeth of members of the genus Otodus, indicating that O. megalodon occupied a higher trophic level than is known for any marine species, extinct or extant, is presented by Kast et al. (2022).[51]
Cooper et al. (2022) create the first three-dimensional model of the body of Otodus megalodon and use it to infer its movement and feeding ecology, interpreting it as likely able to swim great distances and to feed on prey as large as modern apex predators.[52]
A study on tooth marks on physeteroid bones from the Miocene Pisco Formation (Peru) is published by Benites-Palomino et al. (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that Miocene sharks were actively targeting the foreheads of physeteroids to feed on their lipid-rich nasal complexes, with the shape and distribution of the bite marks suggesting a series of consecutive scavenging events by members of different shark species.[53]
A study on the evolutionary history of carcharhiniform sharks is published by Brée, Condamine & Guinot (2022), who interpret their findings as indicative of an early low diversity period followed by a radiation exacerbated since 30 million years ago, as well as indicating that variations in diversification through time were likely linked to reef expansion and temperature change.[54]
Greenfield, Delsate & Candoni (2022) coin a new name Toarcibatidae for the family of Toarcian batomorphs previously referred to as Archaeobatidae.[55]
A study on the microstructure of rostral denticles of Ischyrhiza mira is published by Cook et al. (2022)[56]
New record of large dermal tubercles and bucklers, including tubercles similar in morphology to "Ceratoptera unios" and dermal bucklers similar in morphology to those of the extant roughtail stingray, is reported from the Lower Pleistocene Waccamaw Formation (South Carolina, United States) by Boessenecker & Gibson (2022), who interpret this findings as likely fossils of large stingrays in excess of 3 m disc width.[57]
A study on the phylogenetic relationships of extant and fossil rays and skates is published by Villalobos-Segura et al. (2022).[58]
A study on the completeness of the chondrichthyan fossil record from Florida, aiming to determine patterns in taxonomic and ecomorphological diversity of Eocene to Pleistocene chondrichthyans from the Florida Platform, is published by Perez (2022).[59]
Szabó et al. (2022) describe an assemblage of cartilaginous fishes from the Miocene Tekeres Schlieren Member of the Baden Formation (Hungary), including the first known records of deepwater cartilaginous fishes from the Badenian of the Central Paratethys.[60]
Fossil material of a diverse shark and ray fauna is reported from the early Pleistocene of Taiwan by Lin, Lin & Shimada (2022).[61]
A member of the family Thoracopteridae. Genus includes "Thoracopterus" magnificus Tintori & Sassi (1987) and "Thoracopterus" martinisi Tintori & Sassi (1992).
An early ray-finned fish belonging to the group Palaeonisciformes and the family Palaeoniscidae. The type species is K. gubini Esin & Bakaev; genus also includes K. dozmerensis Esin & Bakaev. Published online in 2023, but the issue date is listed as December 2022.[94]
A member of the family Gobiidae belonging to the Priolepis lineage within the subfamily Gobiinae. The type species is M. renesulcis; genus also includes M. podolicus.
An early ray-finned fish with affinities to post-Devonian species Wendyichthys dicksoni and Cyranorhis bergeraci. Genus includes new species P. clackorum.
A member of the family Gobiidae belonging to the subfamily Gobiinae and the tribe Gobiosomatini. The type species is P. inauditus; genus also includes P. kiselevi.
A member of the family Congridae. The type species is "Pseudoxenomystax" treldeensis Schwarzhans (2007); genus also includes "Bathycongrus" waihaoensis Schwarzhans (2019).
A member of Eurynotoidiformes. The type species is "Isadia" opokiensis Minikh & Andrushkevich (2017). Published online in 2023, but the issue date is listed as December 2022.[100]
A member of the family Pycnodontidae. Genus includes new species X. gyrodoides. The generic name is preoccupied by Xinjiangodus Yue & Gao (1992).
Ray-finned fish research
A new database of the occurrences of Paleozoic ray-finned fishes is presented by Henderson et al. (2022), who evaluate the impact of fossil record biases, as well as taxonomic and phylogenetic issues, on the knowledge of the early evolution of ray-finned fishes;[125] subsequently Henderson, Dunne & Giles (2022) use this database to study patterns of diversity of ray-finned fishes through the Paleozoic, taking the extent and impact of sampling biases into account.[126]
A novel mode of fang accommodation, with teeth of the lower jaw inserting into fenestrae of the upper jaw, is reported in Brazilichthys macrognathus by Figueroa & Andrews (2022).[127]
Redescription and a study on the affinities of Toyemia is published by Bakaev & Kogan (2022).[128]
Redescription of the anatomy and a study on the affinities of Brachydegma caelatum is published by Argyriou, Giles & Friedman (2022).[129]
Fossil material of a member or a relative of the genus Eomesodon, representing the oldest record of pycnodonts from East Gondwana reported to date, is described from the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) Jaisalmer Formation (Rajasthan, India) by Kumar et al. (2022).[131]
A study on the tooth replacement pattern and implantation in Serrasalmimus secans is published by Matsui & Kimura (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that serrasalmimid pycnodont fish independently acquired a vertical replacement in true thecodont implantation, i.e. a characteristic tooth replacement pattern of mammals.[132]
A study on the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of extant and extinct gars is published by Brownstein et al. (2022).[133]
Redescription and a study on the affinities of Saurostomus esocinus is published by Cooper & Maxwell (2022), who interpret this taxon as the basalmost transitional member of the suspension-feeding clade of pachycormids.[134]
A study on bone repair in response to damage in Leedsichthys problematicus is published by Johanson et al. (2022).[135]
Redescription and a study on the affinities of Thaumaturus intermedius is published by Micklich & Arratia (2022).[136]
Redescription of "Diplomystus" solignaci is published by Marramà, Khalloufi & Carnevale (2022), who interpret this fish as a paraclupeid ellimmichthyiform, and transfer it to the genus Paraclupea.[137]
A study on cranial morphological features that diagnose known families of catfishes, and on their implications for the knowledge of the affinities of catfishes from the Paleogene of Africa, is published by Murray & Holmes (2022), who reassess the familial placement of the Paleogene African catfishes and assign Eomacrones wilsoni to the family Bagridaesensu stricto.[138]
Description of new fossil material of Enchodus from the Cenomanian of Ukraine, and a revision of earlier records of Enchodus from Ukraine, is published by Kovalchuk, Barkaszi & Anfimova (2022).[139]
Redescription and a study on the phylogenetic affinities of Protosyngnathus sumatrensis is published by Murray (2022).[140]
A study on the phylogenetic affinities of fossil gobioids is published by Gierl et al. (2022).[141]
A study on patterns of body size evolution of tetraodontiforms in relation to paleoclimate events is published by Troyer et al. (2022).[143]
Přikryl et al. (2022) describe a new specimen of Archaeotetraodon winterbottomi from the Oligocene Rybnytsia Member of the Menilite Series (Ukraine), providing new information on the anatomy of this tetraodontid.[144]
A lungfish belonging to the family Ceratodontidae. The type species is R. salvadori.
Lobe-finned fish research
Review of the phylogenetic analyses of onychodont relationships, aiming to determine the sources of discrepancies in the different phylogenetic hypotheses, is published by Ciudad Real et al. (2022).[154]
A study on the histology of the median fin bones and life history of Miguashaia bureaui is published by Mondéjar Fernandez et al. (2022).[155]
Toriño et al. (2022) describe a large mawsoniid coelacanth from the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay (United Kingdom), interpret its morphology as unexpectedly similar to the morphology of Mawsonia, and consider the studied coelacanth to be either an unknown Mawsonia-like form or a member of the lineage of Trachymetopon with some morphological characters previously assumed as diagnostic for Mawsonia.[156]
Description of two well-preserved specimens of Youngolepis praecursor from the Devonian Xitun Formation (China), and a study on the implications of these specimens for the knowledge of the evolution of the specialized lungfish feeding mechanism, is published by Cui et al. (2022).[158]
A study on the anatomy of the neurocrania of Scaumenacia curta and Pentlandia macroptera is published by Boirot, Challands & Cloutier (2022), who report that the neurocranium of P. macroptera was at least partially ossified, while S. curta had a cartilaginous neurocranium, and evaluate the implications of their findings for the knowledge of paedomorphosis in lungfish evolution.[159]
A study on the anatomy and affinities of Palaeospondylus gunni is published by Hirasawa et al. (2022), who interpret this taxon as a sarcopterygian, and likely a stem-tetrapod;[161] their conclusions are subsequently contested by Brownstein (2023).[162][163]
A stem-chondrichthyan. The type species is S. vermiformis.
General research
A study on the evolution of swimming speed in early vertebrates, inferred from caudal fin morphology of Paleozoic cyclostomes (Myxinidae and Petromyzontidae), jawless stemgnathostomes (Conodonta, Anaspida, Pteraspidomorphi, Thelodonti and Osteostraci) and placoderms, is published by Ferrón & Donoghue (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that microsquamous taxa (thelodonts and anaspids) had higher swimming capabilities than vertebrates with rigid bony carapaces (including placoderms), that demonstrating that the rise of active nektonic vertebrates long-predated the Devonian.[166]
A study on the morphological similarities of Silurian and Devonian jawless and jawed vertebrates, aiming to determine which groups were most and least likely to have competed (and whether competition with jawed vertebrates was likely to cause the extinction of the majority of jawless vertebrates), is published by Scott & Anderson (2022), who don't find support for overall competitive exclusion of jawless vertebrates by jawed vertebrates.[167]
A study on the evolution of the vertebrate spiracular region from jawless vertebrates to tetrapods is published by Gai et al. (2022).[168]
Description of the ichthyolith assemblage from the Upper Triassic Luning Formation (Nevada, United States), increasing known diversity of marine vertebrates in the western United States in the Late Triassic from four to at least 14 genera, is published by Tackett, Zierer & Clement (2022), who report evidence of the presence of taxa that were previously known only from Europe during the Late Triassic.[170]
A study aiming to reconstruct the fish community and oceanographic conditions off the coast of Peru during the last interglacial, based on data from sediments from the northern Humboldt Current system, is published by Salvatteci et al. (2022).[172]
Paleontology or palaeontology is the study of prehistoric life forms on Earth through the examination of plant and animal fossils. This includes the study of body fossils, tracks (ichnites), burrows, cast-off parts, fossilised feces (coprolites), palynomorphs and chemical residues. Because humans have encountered fossils for millennia, paleontology has a long history both before and after becoming formalized as a science. This article records significant discoveries and events related to paleontology that occurred or were published in the year 2004.
Paleontology or palaeontology is the study of prehistoric life forms on Earth through the examination of plant and animal fossils. This includes the study of body fossils, tracks (ichnites), burrows, cast-off parts, fossilised feces (coprolites), palynomorphs and chemical residues. Because humans have encountered fossils for millennia, paleontology has a long history both before and after becoming formalized as a science. This article records significant discoveries and events related to paleontology that occurred or were published in the year 2008.
Hybodontiformes, commonly called hybodonts, are an extinct group of shark-like cartilaginous fish (chondrichthyans) which existed from the late Devonian to the Late Cretaceous. Hybodonts share a close common ancestry with modern sharks and rays (Neoselachii) as part of the clade Euselachii. They are distinguished from other chondrichthyans by their distinctive fin spines and cephalic spines present on the heads of males. An ecologically diverse group, they were abundant in marine and freshwater environments during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic, but were rare in open marine environments by the end of the Jurassic, having been largely replaced by modern sharks, though they were still common in freshwater and marginal marine habitats. They survived until the end of the Cretaceous, before going extinct.
Paleontology or palaeontology is the study of prehistoric life forms on Earth through the examination of plant and animal fossils. This includes the study of body fossils, tracks (ichnites), burrows, cast-off parts, fossilised feces (coprolites), palynomorphs and chemical residues. Because humans have encountered fossils for millennia, paleontology has a long history both before and after becoming formalized as a science. This article records significant discoveries and events related to paleontology that occurred or were published in the year 2012.
The evolution of fish began about 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion. It was during this time that the early chordates developed the skull and the vertebral column, leading to the first craniates and vertebrates. The first fish lineages belong to the Agnatha, or jawless fish. Early examples include Haikouichthys. During the late Cambrian, eel-like jawless fish called the conodonts, and small mostly armoured fish known as ostracoderms, first appeared. Most jawless fish are now extinct; but the extant lampreys may approximate ancient pre-jawed fish. Lampreys belong to the Cyclostomata, which includes the extant hagfish, and this group may have split early on from other agnathans.
This list of fossil fish species is a list of taxa of fish that have been described during the year 2012. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2014 is a list of new taxa of placoderms, fossil cartilaginous fishes and bony fishess of every kind that have been described during the year 2014, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of fishes that occurred in the year 2014. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2013 is a list of new taxa of placoderms, fossil cartilaginous fishes and bony fishess of every kind that have been described during the year 2013. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2015 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes and other fishes of every kind that have been described during the year 2015, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of fishes that occurred in the year 2015. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2016 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes and other fishes of every kind that have been described during the year 2016, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of fishes that occurred in the year 2016. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2017 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes and other fishes of every kind that are scheduled to be described during the year 2017, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of fishes that are scheduled to occur in the year 2017. The list only includes taxa at the level of genus or species.
This list of fossil fish described in 2018 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fish, bony fish, and other fish of every kind that are scheduled to be described during the year 2018, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of fish that are scheduled to occur in 2018.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2019 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes, and other fishes of every kind that were described during the year 2019, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleoichthyology that occurred in 2019.
This list of fossil fishes described in 2020 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes, and other fishes of every kind that were described during the year 2020, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleoichthyology that occurred in 2020.
This list of fossil fish research presented in 2021 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes, and other fishes that were described during the year, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleoichthyology that occurred in 2021.
This paleobotany list records new fossil plant taxa that were to be described during the year 2022, as well as notes other significant paleobotany discoveries and events which occurred during 2022.
This list of fossil fish research presented in 2023 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes, and other fishes that were described during the year, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleoichthyology that occurred in 2023.
This list of fossil fish research presented in 2024 is a list of new taxa of jawless vertebrates, placoderms, acanthodians, fossil cartilaginous fishes, bony fishes, and other fishes that were described during the year, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleoichthyology that occurred in 2024.
1 2 Shan, X.; Gai, Z.; Lin, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, W. (2022). "The oldest eugaleaspiform fishes from the Silurian red beds in Jiangxi, South China and their stratigraphic significance". Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 229: Article 105187. Bibcode:2022JAESc.22905187S. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105187. S2CID247493604.
↑ Shan, X.; Zhao, W.; Gai, Z. (2022). "A New Species of Jiangxialepis (Galeaspida) from the Lower Telychian (Silurian) of Jiangxi and its Biostratigraphic Significance". Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition). 97 (2): 393–403. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.15009. S2CID252813209.
↑ Sun, H.-R.; Gai, Z.-K.; Cai, J.-C.; Li, Q.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, W.-J. (2022). "Xitunaspis, a new eugaleaspid fish (Eugaleaspiformes, Galeaspida) from the Lower Devonian of Qujing, Yunnan". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 60 (3): 169–183. doi:10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.220412.
↑ Chevrinais, M.; Morel, C.; Renaud, C. B.; Cloutier, R. (2022). "Ontogeny of Euphanerops longaevus from the Upper Devonian Miguasha Fossil-Fish-Lagerstätte and comparison with the skeletogenesis of the Sea Lamprey Petromyzon marinus". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 60 (3): 350–365. doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0062. S2CID254529477.
↑ Meng, X.-Y.; Zhu, M.; Li, Q.; Gai, Z.-K. (2022). "New data on the cranial anatomy of Pterogonaspis (Tridensaspidae, Galeaspida) from the lower Devonian of Yunnan, China and its evolutionary implications". The Anatomical Record. doi:10.1002/ar.25098. PMID36271627. S2CID253063254.
↑ Zhu, Y.-A.; Wang, Y.-J.; Qu, Q.-M.; Lu, J.; Zhu, M. (2022). "The pelvic morphology of Parayunnanolepis (Placodermi, Antiarcha) revealed by tomographic data". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. doi:10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.221126.
↑ Trinajstic, K.; Long, J. A.; Sanchez, S.; Boisvert, C. A.; Snitting, D.; Tafforeau, P.; Dupret, V.; Clement, A. M.; Currie, P. D.; Roelofs, B.; Bevitt, J. J.; Lee, M. S. Y.; Ahlberg, P. E. (2022). "Exceptional preservation of organs in Devonian placoderms from the Gogo lagerstätte". Science. 377 (6612): 1311–1314. Bibcode:2022Sci...377.1311T. doi:10.1126/science.abf3289. PMID36107996. S2CID252310376.
↑ Malyshkina, T. P.; Ward, D. J.; Nazarkin, M. V.; Nam, G.-S.; Kwon, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, T.-W.; Kim, D.-K.; Baek, D.-S. (2022). "Miocene Elasmobranchii from the Duho Formation, South Korea". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (9): 1726–1741. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2110870. S2CID252512629.
↑ Pollerspöck, J.; Straube, N. (2022). "Phylogenetic placement and description of an extinct genus and species of kitefin shark based on tooth fossils (Squaliformes: Dalatiidae)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (15): 1083–1096. doi:10.1080/14772019.2021.2012537. S2CID246398258.
↑ Wen, W.; Kriwet, J.; Zhang, Q.; Benton, M. J.; Duffin, C. J.; Huang, J.; Zhou, C.; Hu, S.; Ma, Z. (2022). "Hybodontiform shark remains (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the Lower Triassic of Yunnan Province, China, with comments on hybodontiform diversity across the PTB". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (1): e2108712. Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E8712W. doi:10.1080/02724634.2022.2108712. S2CID252136919.
↑ Duffin, C. J.; Lauer, B.; Lauer, R. (2022). "Chimaeroid egg cases from the Late Jurassic of the Solnhofen area (S Germany)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 306 (2): 161–175. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2022/1101. S2CID253870360.
↑ Luccisano, V.; Rambert-Natsuaki, M.; Cuny, G.; Amiot, R.; Pouillon, J.-M.; Pradel, A. (2022). "Phylogenetic implications of the systematic reassessment of Xenacanthiformes and 'Ctenacanthiformes' (Chondrichthyes) neurocrania from the Carboniferous–Permian Autun Basin (France)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (23): 1623–1642. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2073279. S2CID239328598.
↑ Kanno, S.; Tokumaru, S.; Nakagaki, S.; Nakajima, Y.; Misaki, A.; Hikida, Y.; Sato, T. (2022). "Santonian-Campanian neoselachian faunas of the Upper Cretaceous Yezo Group in Nakagawa Town, Hokkaido, Japan". Cretaceous Research. 133: Article 105139. Bibcode:2022CrRes.13305139K. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105139. S2CID245831871.
↑ dos Santos, R. O.; Riff, D.; Amenábar, C. R.; Ramos, R. R. C.; Rodrigues, I. F.; Scheffler, S. M.; Carvalho, M. A. (2022). "New records of hexanchiform sharks (Elasmobranchii: Neoselachii) from the Late Cretaceous of Antarctica with comments on previous reports and described taxa". New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics: 1–16. doi:10.1080/00288306.2022.2143382. S2CID253570784.
↑ Feichtinger, I.; Kindlimann, R.; Guinot, G.; Harzhauser, M.; Pollerspöck, J. (2022). "First record of the somniosid shark Protoxynotus misburgensis from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of the Southern Tethyan Realm". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology: 1–6. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2162401. S2CID255331620.
↑ Herraiz, J. L.; Carrillo-Briceño, J. D.; Ferrón, H. G.; Adnet, S.; Botella, H.; Martínez-Pérez, C. (2022). "First fossil record (Middle Miocene) of the viper shark Trigonognathus Mochizuki and Ohe, 1990, in the Mediterranean realm". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (1). e2114360. Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E4360H. doi:10.1080/02724634.2022.2114360. hdl:10550/84833. S2CID253065446.
↑ Malyshkina, T. P.; Nam, G.-S.; Kwon, S. H. (2022). "Basking shark remains (Lamniformes, Cetorhinidae) from the Miocene of South Korea". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 41 (5): e2037625. doi:10.1080/02724634.2021.2037625. S2CID247466156.
↑ Sternes, P. C.; Wood, J. J.; Shimada, K. (2023). "Body forms of extant lamniform sharks (Elasmobranchii: Lamniformes), and comments on the morphology of the extinct megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon, and the evolution of lamniform thermophysiology". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35: 139–151. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.2025228. S2CID246655344.
↑ Shimada, K.; Maisch, H. M.; Perez, V. J.; Becker, M. A.; Griffiths, M. L. (2023). "Revisiting body size trends and nursery areas of the Neogene megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae), reveals Bergmann's rule possibly enhanced its gigantism in cooler waters". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (2): 208–217. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2032024. S2CID247311831.
↑ Greenfield, T.; Delsate, D.; Candoni, L. (2022). "Toarcibatidae fam. nov., a replacement for the unavailable name Archaeobatidae Delsate & Candoni, 2001 (Chondrichthyes, Batomorphii)". Zootaxa. 5195 (5): 499–500. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.5195.5.8. PMID37044410. S2CID252926330.
↑ Cook, T. D.; Prothero, J.; Brudy, M.; Magraw, J. A. (2022). "Complex enameloid microstructure of †Ischyrhiza mira rostral denticles". Journal of Anatomy. 241 (3): 616–627. doi:10.1111/joa.13676. PMC9358731. PMID35445396.
↑ Boessenecker, R. W.; Gibson, M. L. (2022). "Dermal tubercles and bucklers of gigantic stingrays (Dasyatidae) from the Pleistocene of South Carolina and the stratigraphic origin of "Ceratoptera unios" Leidy, 1877". PalZ. 96 (2): 267–273. doi:10.1007/s12542-021-00592-5. S2CID246082139.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Carolin, N.; Bajpai, S.; Maurya, A. S.; Schwarzhans, W. (2022). "New perspectives on late Tethyan Neogene biodiversity development of fishes based on Miocene (~ 17 Ma) otoliths from southwestern India". PalZ. 97: 43–80. doi:10.1007/s12542-022-00623-9. S2CID249184395.
↑ Than-Marchese, B. A.; Alvarado-Ortega, J. (2022). "Armigatus felixi sp. nov. An Albian double armored herring (Clupeomorpha, Ellimmichthyiformes) from the Tlayúa lagerstätte, Mexico". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 118: Article 103905. Bibcode:2022JSAES.11803905T. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103905.
↑ de Figueiredo, F. J.; Gallo, V. (2022). "Caboellimma, a new genus for "Ellimma" cruzae Santos, 1990, an ellimmichthyiform fish (Teleostei: Clupeomorpha) from the Cabo Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of the Pernambuco-Paraíba Basin, north-east Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 142. 105393. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105393. S2CID253006605.
↑ Stack, J.; Gottfried, M. D. (2022). "A new, exceptionally well-preserved Permian actinopterygian fish from the Minnekahta Limestone of South Dakota, USA". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (18): 1271–1302. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2036837. S2CID247537869.
↑ Nam, G.-S.; Nazarkin, M. V.; Bannikov, A. F. (2023). "A new Chinese perch (Perciformes, Sinipercidae) from the early Miocene of South Korea". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (4): 615–622. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2056842. S2CID247899188.
↑ Grădianu, I.; Bordeianu, M.; Codrea, V. (2023). "†Dicentrarchus oligocenicus, sp. nov. (Perciformes, Moronidae): the first record of an Oligocene Sea Bass skeleton from Romania, with a revision of †Morone major (Agassiz) from Piatra-Neamţ (Eastern Carpathians)". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35: 92–101. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.2022136. S2CID246524168.
↑ Stringer, G.; Parmley, D.; Quinn, A. (2022). "Eocene teleostean otoliths, including a new taxon, from the Clinchfield Formation (Bartonian) in Georgia, USA, with biostratigraphic, biogeographic, and paleoecologic implications". Palæovertebrata. 45 (1): e1. doi:10.18563/pv.45.1.e1. S2CID245714502.
↑ Ribeiro, A. C.; Bockmann, F. A.; Poyato-Ariza, F. J. (2022). "Francischanos, a replacement genus for Dastilbe moraesi Silva-Santos, 1955, from the Quiricó Formation, Lower Cretaceous of the Sanfranciscana basin, Brazil (Ostariophysi: Gonorynchiformes)". Cretaceous Research. 135: Article 105212. Bibcode:2022CrRes.13505212R. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105212. S2CID247531742.
↑ Kim, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-N.; Park, J.-Y.; Lee, S.; Winkler, D. A.; Jacobs, L. L.; Barsbold, R. (2022). "A new species of Osteoglossomorpha (Actinopterygii: Teleostei) from the Upper Cretaceous Nemegt Formation of Mongolia: paleobiological and paleobiogeographic implications". Cretaceous Research. 135: Article 105214. Bibcode:2022CrRes.13505214K. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105214. S2CID247637952.
↑ Shen, C.; Arratia, G. (2022). "Re-description of the sexually dimorphic peltopleuriform fish Wushaichthys exquisitus (Middle Triassic, China): taxonomic implications and phylogenetic relationships". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (19): 1317–1342. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2029595. S2CID247731689.
↑ Sferco, E.; Aguilera, G.; Góngora, J. M.; Mirande, J. M. (2022). "The eldest grandmother, late Miocene †Jenynsia herbsti sp. nov. (Teleostei, Cyprinodontiformes), and the early diversification of the Anablepidae". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 41 (6): e2039168. doi:10.1080/02724634.2022.2039168. S2CID247419040.
↑ Gouiric-Cavalli, S.; Arratia, G. (2022). "A new †Pachycormiformes (Actinopterygii) from the Upper Jurassic of Gondwana sheds light on the evolutionary history of the group". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (21): 1517–1550. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2049382. S2CID248454343.
↑ Schwarzhans, W.; Radwańska, U. (2022). "A review of lanternfish otoliths (Myctophidae, Teleostei) of the early Badenian (Langhian, middle Miocene) from Bęczyn, southern Poland". Cainozoic Research. 22 (1): 9–24.
↑ Přikryl, T.; Kaur, J.; Murray, A. M. (2022). "New Oligocene Pseudocrenilabrinae cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from freshwater deposits of Libya". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (19): 1343–1366. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2033861. S2CID247834413.
↑ Gallo, V.; de Paiva, H. C. L.; Petra, R.; Brito, P. (2022). "Lophionotus parnaibensis, sp. nov. (Semionotiformes, Semionotidae) in the Upper Jurassic of the Parnaíba Basin, Northeastern Brazil". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 41 (4). e1994983. doi:10.1080/02724634.2021.1994983. S2CID246164511.
1 2 3 4 5 De Gracia, C.; Correa-Metrio, A.; Carvalho, M.; Velez-Juarbe, J.; Přikryl, T.; Jaramillo, C.; Kriwet, J. (2022). "Towards a unifying systematic scheme of fossil and living billfishes (Teleostei, Istiophoridae)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 20 (1): Article 2091959. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2091959. S2CID251704310.
1 2 3 4 Bulanov, V. V.; Minikh, A. V.; Golubev, V. K. (2022). "Minicholepis primus gen. et sp. nov., a New Eurynotoidiform Fish (Actinopterygii) from the Permian of European Russia". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1363–1371. doi:10.1134/S0031030122110041. S2CID256618572.
↑ Giles, S.; Feilich, K.; Warnock, R. C. M.; Pierce, S. E.; Friedman, M. (2022). "A Late Devonian actinopterygian suggests high lineage survivorship across the end-Devonian mass extinction". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7 (1): 10–19. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01919-4. PMID36396970. S2CID253626895.
↑ Yang, T.; Liang, W.; Cai, J.; Gu, H.; Han, L.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Bao, L.; Yan, D. (2022). "A new cyprinid from the Oligocene of Qaidam Basin, north-eastern Tibetan plateau, and its implications". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (17): 1161–1182. doi:10.1080/14772019.2021.2015470. S2CID246400371.
↑ Fang, G.; Wu, F. (2022). "The predatory fish Saurichthys reflects a complex underwater ecosystem of the Late Triassic Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (8): 1449–1459. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2098023. S2CID250567176.
↑ Fang, G.-Y.; Sun, Y.-L.; Ji, C.; Wu, F.-X. (2022). "First record of Saurichthys (Actinopterygii: Saurichthyidae) from the Late Triassic of eastern Paleo-Tethys". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 61 (1): 1–16. doi:10.19615/j.cnki.2096-9899.221013.
↑ Bogan, S.; Agnolin, F. L. (2022). "The first fossil from the superdiverse clade Loricariinae (Siluriformes, Loricariidae): a new species of the Armored Catfish from the late Miocene of Paraná, Argentina". PalZ. 96 (2): 259–266. doi:10.1007/s12542-022-00613-x. S2CID247193983.
↑ Schwarzhans, W.; Kovalchuk, O. (2022). "New data on fish otoliths from the late Badenian (Langhian, Middle Miocene) back reef environment in the Carpathian Foredeep (Horodok, western Ukraine)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 303 (3): 317–326. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2022/1051. S2CID248028845.
↑ Zhou, X.; You, J.; Jin, J.; Feng, Q.; Luo, Z.; Hu, J.; Li, Y. (2022). "A minute freshwater pycnodont fish from the Late Cretaceous on the southern margin of the Junggar Basin: Palaeoecological implications". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35 (9): 1528–1535. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2099274. S2CID250515577.
↑ Brownstein, C. D.; Yang, L.; Friedman, M.; Near, T. J. (2022). "Phylogenomics of the Ancient and Species-Depauperate Gars Tracks 150 Million Years of Continental Fragmentation in the Northern Hemisphere". Systematic Biology. 72 (1): 213–227. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac080. PMID36537110.
↑ Johanson, Z.; Liston, J.; Davesne, D.; Challands, T.; Smith, M. M. (2022). "Mechanisms of dermal bone repair after predatory attack in the giant stem-group teleost Leedsichthys problematicus Woodward, 1889a (Pachycormiformes)". Journal of Anatomy. 241 (2): 393–406. doi:10.1111/joa.13689. PMC9296021. PMID35588137.
↑ Micklich, N.; Arratia, G. (2022). "The enigmatic teleostean fish, Thaumaturus intermedius Weitzel, 1933 from the Eocene of Lake Messel (Hessen, S Germany). Part I: Anatomy and taxonomy revised". Palaeontographica Abteilung A. 323 (1–3): 1–73. Bibcode:2022PalAA.323....1M. doi:10.1127/pala/2022/0125. S2CID248029950.
↑ Marramà, G.; Khalloufi, B.; Carnevale, G. (2023). "Redescription of 'Diplomystus' solignaci Gaudant & Gaudant, 1971 from the Cretaceous of Tunisia, and a new hypothesis of double-armored herring relationships". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 35: 163–184. doi:10.1080/08912963.2021.2025230. S2CID246669579.
↑ Kovalchuk, O.; Barkaszi, Z.; Anfimova, G. (2022). "Records of Enchodus (Teleostei, Aulopiformes) from the Cenomanian of Ukraine in the light of European distribution of enchodontid fishes". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 303 (3): 295–307. doi:10.1127/njgpa/2022/1049. S2CID248042502.
↑ Murray, A. M. (2022). "Re-description and phylogenetic relationships of †Protosyngnathus sumatrensis (Teleostei: Syngnathoidei), a freshwater pipefish from the Eocene of Sumatra, Indonesia". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 20 (1). 2113832. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2113832. S2CID252664420.
1 2 Minikh, A. O. (2022). "A New Species of the Genus Ceratodus (Dipnoi, Ceratodontidae) from the Triassic of the Southern Cis-Urals". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1385–1390. doi:10.1134/S0031030122110090. S2CID256618440.
↑ Luo, Y.; Cui, X.; Qiao, T.; Zhu, M. (2022). "A new dipnoan genus from the Middle Devonian of Huize, Yunnan, China". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 19 (18): 1303–1315. doi:10.1080/14772019.2022.2042409. S2CID247815324.
↑ Downs, J. P.; Daeschler, E. B. (2022). "Second species of Langlieria (Tristichopteridae, Sarcopterygii) from the Upper Devonian Catskill Formation of Pennsylvania, U.S.A., and a new phylogenetic consideration of Tristichopteridae". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 167: 241–260. doi:10.1635/053.167.0115. S2CID248357147.
↑ Toriño, P.; Gausden, S. F.; Etches, S.; Rankin, K.; Marshall, J. E. A.; Gostling, N. J. (2022). "An enigmatic large mawsoniid coelacanth (Sarcopterygii, Actinistia) from the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation of England". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (1). e2125813. Bibcode:2022JVPal..42E5813T. doi:10.1080/02724634.2022.2125813. S2CID253141244.
↑ Panzeri, K. M.; Pereyra, M. E.; Cione, A. L. (2022). "The South American longfish Metaceratodus baibianorum (Dipnoi, Ceratodontidae) from the Upper Cretaceous La Colonia Formation, Patagonia, Argentina: an approach from the histology of the tooth plates". Cretaceous Research. 133: Article 105144. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105144. S2CID246121918.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
