European Citizens' Initiative

Last updated

Part of the Politics series
Direct democracy
Ballot Box Silhouette.svg
Referendum types
Referendums by country
Referendums by issue
Referendums by method
History of direct democracy
Related
A coloured voting box.svg Politicsportal

The European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) is a European Union (EU) mechanism aimed at increasing direct democracy by enabling "EU citizens to participate directly in the development of EU policies", [1] introduced with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2007. This popular initiative enables one million citizens of the European Union, [2] with a minimum number of nationals from at least seven member states, to call directly on the European Commission to propose a legal act (notably a Directive or Regulation) in an area where the member states have conferred powers onto the EU level. This right to request the commission to initiate a legislative proposal puts citizens on the same footing as the European Parliament and the European Council, who enjoy this right according to Articles 225 and 241 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TEFU). The commission holds the right of initiative in the EU. The first registered ECI, Fraternité 2020, was initiated on 9 May 2012 (Europe Day), although the first submitted ECI (but second registered) was One Single Tariff.

Contents

Historical background

The ECI has its origins in the Constitutional Convention on the Future of Europe in 2002–2003. Thanks to the campaign work of activists and Convention members the ECI was introduced in a last-minute act into the Constitutional Treaty. [3] [4]

In 2005, the Constitutional Treaty was rejected by the citizens of France and the Netherlands in two national referendums. As a consequence of that, Intergovernmental Conference prepared the Treaty of Lisbon. The treaty ratification was delayed due to referendum in Ireland where it was initially rejected in June 2008 by the Irish electorate, a decision which was reversed in a second referendum in October 2009.

On 13 December 2007, the Treaty of Lisbon was signed by all the EU Member States. On 11 November 2009, the European Commission published a Green Paper on the European Citizens' Initiative, launching a public consultation process on the ECI. [5]

The council and the commission came up with a preliminary compromise on 14 June 2010. After it produced several drafts and opinions that were discussed in the Constitutional Affairs and Petitions Committees, the European Parliament, on 15 December 2010, finally voted on the ECI Regulation. After one year of negotiations, all three main EU institutions (the European Commission, the Council and the European Parliament) agreed on a final ECI Regulation, on 16 February 2011.

The initiative was inspired by Switzerland, which is not a member of the EU. The country has several tools of direct democracy such as the federal popular initiative (since 1848) and the optional referendum (since 1874).

The legal basis of the citizens' initiative is set out in Article 11, Paragraph 4 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 24, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Both articles were newly introduced with the Treaty of Lisbon. The ECI complements the existing right of petitioning the European Parliament and the right of appeal to the Ombudsman as set out in the Treaty of Maastricht (1993). Petitions and the ECI are fundamentally different however in terms of function, addressees and conditions. [6]

The practical arrangements, conditions and procedure of the ECI are determined in the Regulation 2019/788 on the European citizens' initiative, which has been applicable since 1 January 2020. [7] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2019/1779 lays down technical specifications for the ECI's online collection systems. [8]

The regulation 2019/788 replaced the original regulation 211/2011. Initiatives that were registered until 31 December 2019 are still partly governed by the old rules: • General rules – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 • Online signature collection – Regulation (EU) No 1179/2011

The new Regulation requires a review by 1 January 2024, and every three years thereafter. In the review process, the commission presents a report on the implementation of the ECI regulation with a view to its possible revision, to which the European Parliament reacts in a report with further recommendations.

Initiatives

Before entry into force

Greenpeace collected one million signatures in December 2010 for a petition, hosted by Avaaz, against the authorisation of new GM crops in Europe. [9] Although Greenpeace has called the petition an ECI in the media, it has never been formally registered with the commission, which would not have been possible before 1 April 2012, and so can therefore not be regarded an ECI, as introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.

First registered initiative

The European Commission chose the symbolic date of 9 May 2012 (Europe Day) to officially launch the first ECI. It turned out to be Fraternité 2020. It was officially registered on 9 May and boasts registration number ECI(2012)000001. [10] The initiative failed to reach the required number of signatures.

First six successful initiatives

Right2Water

On 21 March 2013, Right2Water became the first ECI to collect more than a million signatures and it reached the minimum quota of signatures in seven countries on 7 May 2013. It stopped collecting signatures on 7 September 2013, with a total of 1,857,605 signatures. The initiative was submitted to the commission in December 2013 and its public hearing at the European Parliament took place on 17 February 2014. [11] In March 2014, the commission adopted the Communication in response to the Right2Water initiative. [12] On 1 July 2015, the commission published the Roadmap for the evaluation of the Drinking Water Directive [13] and in February 2018, a proposal for the revision of the Drinking Water Directive. In December 2020, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the revised Directive, which entered into force in January 2021. The commission has also carried out a number of other actions in response to this initiative.

One of Us

The pro-life initiative One of Us also was among the very first batch of initiatives to be registered. On 28 February 2014, One of Us was submitted to the commission as an ECI, having gathered 1,896,852 signatures (so far the highest number of signatures per ECI). The initiative sought that the EU "establish a ban and end the financing of activities which presuppose the destruction of human embryos, in particular in the areas of research, development aid and public health." [14] Uniquely for European Citizen Initiatives, it comprised an elaborated legislative draft which it wanted the European Commission to uses as a basis for a legislative procedure. The primary component of the draft was a proposal to introduce into the EU's Financial Regulation language that would have specifically prohibited the EU from funding any activity involving, directly or indirectly, the destruction of human embryos. This was further spelt out in proposed amendments to the EU's research program Horizon 2020 and to the EU's legislation on development aid.

A public hearing on the initiative took place at the European Parliament on 10 April 2014. [15] On 28 May 2014 the European Commission adopted the Communication on the European Citizens' Initiative "One of us". [14] The commission decided not to submit a legislative proposal since it considered the existing legal framework, as decided by Member States and the European Parliament only a few months before the submission of the ECI, as appropriate. In its Communication, it explained extensively why it considered that there was no need to modify the legal framework, claiming that the EU did not finance, and never had financed, any activities of the kind targeted by the ECI.

The One of Us initiative subsequently sued the European Commission, arguing, among other things, that the Commission's refusal to act was not properly argued, and that the commission's failure to submit a legislative proposal deprived the co-legislators of the EU, the European Parliament and the Council, of the possibility to take a stance on the successful ECI. The lawsuit remained unsuccessful before the General Court in April 2018 and on appeal before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice in December 2019 [16] , handing to the European Commission a de facto veto right against any European Citizens' Initiative it does not wish to support.

Stop Vivisection

On 3 March 2015, the third European Citizens' Initiative to gather the required number of signatories, Stop Vivisection, was submitted to the commission. The campaign collected 1,326,807 signatures. On 11 May 2015, a public hearing at the European Parliament took place. [17] On 3 June 2015, the European Commission adopted the Communication on the European Citizens' Initiative "Stop Vivisection" [18] proposing a series of non-legislative follow-up actions.

Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides

The initiative was submitted to the commission on 6 October 2017. By that date, 1,070,865 signatures from 22 Member States had been checked and validated. The commission adopted a communication on 12 December 2017, setting out the actions it intends to take in response to the initiative. [19]

On 11 April 2018, the commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation on transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain. The Regulation [20] was adopted by the European Parliament and Council in June 2019. The new legislation started applying on 27 March 2021.

Minority Safepack

A package of 9 proposals (initially 11, 2 blocked by the commission) aiming "to improve the protection of persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities and strengthen cultural and linguistic diversity", and submitted to the commission on 10 January 2020. Supported by FUEN. [21] The European Parliament organised a hearing [22] on 15 October 2020. On 14 January 2021 the commission responded [23] by referring to a series of non-legislative follow-up actions.

End the Cage Age

Over the course of one year, many scientists, companies and more than 170 NGOs supported the ECI, aiming at a phase out of caged farming in the European Union. They succeeded in collecting almost 1.4 million signatures, by emphasising the need for a prohibition of cages for farmed rabbits, pullets, broiler breeders, quail, ducks and geese. Furthermore, the organisers demand a prohibition of farrowing crates for sows and sow stalls, as well as a prohibition of enclosed calf pens. Almost 1.4 million signatures have been gathered, as certified in October 2020. [24] In response to this initiative, the Commission committed to propose legislation to phase out, and finally prohibit, the use of cage systems for the animals mentioned in the ECI by the end of 2023. [25] This deadline was not met, leading to legislative action. [26]

On-going ECIs

The updated list of initiatives registered by the commission and currently collecting support is available in the commission's ECI register.

Ban on conversion practices in the European Union

The European Citizens' Initiative "Ban on conversion practices in the European Union" is led by LGBTI+ associations from all over the European Union, and coordinated by the French association ACT (Against Conversion Practices). This initiative calls on the European Commission to ban "conversion practices" in all its member states and to recognize the rights of conversion practices victims. It was registered on the 24th of January by the European Commission. The petition campaign started on the 17th of May 2024 and will end on the 17th of May 2025.

Refused ECIs

While most ECIs have been approved, a few have been refused, as they did not meet the requirements for registration. Out of 99 ECIs requests for registration submitted between 2012 and 2020, 76 initiatives were registered (with three registered after a court sentence after an original refusal) and 26 were refused. Three of the originally refused initiatives have been registered after a court sentence annulled the initial refusal. The updated list of refused requests for registration ECIs is available in the commission's ECI register [27] Examples:

Withdrawn ECIs

A number of ECIs have decided to withdraw after being approved, for various reasons. Their list is available on the commission's ECI register. [36]

Procedure

Minimum number of signatories per country [37]
Member StateSignatories as of 01/02/2020
Austria13 395
Belgium14 805
Bulgaria11 985
Croatia8 460
Cyprus4 230
Czech Republic14 805
Denmark9 870
Estonia4 935
Finland9 870
France55 695
Germany67 680
Greece14 805
Hungary14 805
Ireland9 165
Italy53 580
Latvia5 640
Lithuania7 755
Luxembourg4 230
Malta4 230
Netherlands20 445
Poland36 660
Portugal14 805
Romania23 265
Slovakia9 870
Slovenia5 640
Spain41 595
Sweden14 805

There are a few steps absolutely necessary to organise an ECI: [38] [39]

Weaknesses

Problems in the design of the ECI have heavily burdened ECI campaigners in the process. These include legal constraints (such as liability issues over data protection and insufficient advice regarding the appropriate legal basis of ECIs), technical issues (the online collection system is not user-friendly and does not let campaigners access email addresses of signatories to keep them informed), and bureaucratic hurdles (each member state has different data requirements and signature forms). Very few citizens are aware that the ECI exists. Moreover, there is little guarantee that a successful ECI will have an actual impact on EU legislation, as the three first 'successful' ECIs have shown.

The review process will offer a reflection over the successes and failures of the ECI during its first three years. Many civil society organisations, ECI organisers and Members of the European Parliament are advocating for a major reform of the ECI regulation. [48] [49]

The ECI Campaign, an organization exclusively working for the successful introduction and implementation of the European Citizens' Initiative right, has proposed 12 concrete ways to make the ECI work. Those suggestions were the result of the publication entitled "An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative". [50]

In order to support and help ECI organizers The ECI Campaign offers a new and improved software to collect signatures called OpenECI.

The ECI Support Centre, a joint initiative of Democracy International, the European Citizen Action Service and the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe, has developed an 'App' for Android smartphones, which informs users of the latest European Citizens' Initiatives. The Centre recommends the EU Commission to develop an ECI-App, which should enable mobile signing and can help raise public awareness of the ECI. [51]

The online signature collection system

The ECI process allows organizers to also collect statements of support online. The first versions of the software provided by the European Commission have been heavily criticized by some developers. [52] [53] Some organisers have also criticized the security regulations regarding the ECI collection process and the number of technical errors during the collection period. [54] In 2016, a new, fully bottom up online collection software has been provided by The ECI Campaign. [55]

Reform process 2015–2016

According to the ECI Regulation 211/2011 every three years the commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the council on the application of the Regulation. In mid-2014, the European Parliament presented a new ECI study entitled "European Citizens‘ Initiative – First lessons of implementation". The analysis was conducted at the request of the AFCO and PETI Committees, and tried to identify difficulties faced by organisers when setting up and running an ECI. [56]

In October 2014 Mr. Frans Timmermans became the newly elected commissioner responsible for the ECI. During the question and answer session in the European Parliament he avoided giving any concrete answers regarding the use or reform of the ECI. [57] A few weeks later The ECI Campaign organised a workshop "An ECI For the Next Generation". Many participants felt that the ECI was "at a crossroad" and needed reform. [58]

In December 2014 the European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) and the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) organised a conference entitled "ECI Legal Framework – Need for Reform?". During the conference the findings and recommendations of a study undertaken by ECAS and the law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer on the legal basis of the refused ECIs were presented and discussed. [59] The overall conclusions of the study are that the legal admissibility requirements are applied in a too narrow fashion by the commission, that decisions to refuse registration were arbitrary and that reasons given for rejection were often incomplete.

On 26 February 2015, the Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) and Petitions (PETI) committees of the European Parliament organised a public hearing on the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI). This marked the official start of debate on the review of the ECI regulation. Despite security restrictions limiting attendance, the hearing attracted a standing-room only crowd. Present were key ECI stakeholders: the European Commission, Parliament and Council, EESC, civil society organisations and ECI organisers. Three and a half hours of discussion led the participants to the conclusion that the ECI needed reform. [60] Speaking at the hearing, Frans Timmermans, First Vice-president of the European Commission, stated that the ECI has not worked well enough and took personal responsibility to improve it so that it would not disappear. [61]

In March 2015 the European Ombudsman, Emily O'Reilly, made proposals to strengthen the role that ECI play in democratic political debate at the European level. The Ombudsman called for better guidance for ECI organisers, a stronger involvement of the European Parliament and the council and increased pressure on the Member States to make sure that all EU citizens can sign an ECI, regardless of where they reside. Emily O'Reilly explained in her statement: "The Commission has done a lot to give effect to the ECI right in a citizen-friendly way. However, more can be done to ensure that ECI organisers feel that their efforts to mobilise one million signatures are worthwhile and that political debate at the European level takes account of their initiatives, even if specific initiatives do not lead to new EU legislation. We need a more effective dialogue with ECI organisers at different stages of an initiative as well as more transparent decision-making as regards what action the Commission takes on ECIs." [62] The Ombudsman's full list of suggestions is available online. [63]

On 31 March 2015, the commission adopted the Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative, which constitutes an important element of potential ECI reform. [64]

On 13 April 2015, third edition of the "ECI Day" took place in the European Economic and Social Committee. The conference was entitled "Review, Renew, Reset!" and focused on the EC's and Ombudsman's reports. [65] During the event The ECI Campaign presented an open letter to European Commission First Vice President Frans Timmermans, signed by 21 ECI campaigns. It called on the commission to propose a deep and meaningful amendment to the ECI's Regulation 211/2011. [66]

In consequence of the above-mentioned conferences and reports Members of European Parliament (MEPs) on the Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) and Petitions (PETI) committees started to draft a report calling for a motion of the European Parliament on the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI). It asks the commission to consider several ways to make the ECI both more impactful and easier to use. AFCO Rapporteur MEP György Schöpflin presented the draft ECI report for discussion on 16 April 2015 AFCO committee meeting. During a lively 45 minute debate, many MEPs expressed their commitment to reform and strengthen the ECI. In consequence, after 2 months of in-depth analysis over 20 members of the AFCO committee came up with 127 amendments to the draft report. Additionally, PETI and JURI committees presented their own opinions on the ECI. [67] [68]

On 16 June 2015, the Latvian Presidency of the Council of the EU, the Council General Secretariat and The ECI Campaign brought together stakeholders from EU institutions, member states and civil society to reflect on the future of the ECI. This was the first ECI conference hosted in the premises of the EU Council. Stakeholders expressed deep concern that ECI use declined dramatically since 2013 and that no ECI led to a legislative proposal. All agreed that the ECI is unnecessarily complex. Participants noted that significant changes to ECI procedures are urgently needed if citizen confidence in the ECI is to be restored and it is to fulfil its promise of participatory democracy. [69]

Differences from referendums

Citizen initiatives are democratic mechanisms that let citizens propose and vote on laws and policies. By gathering a certain number of signatures, citizens can demand a binding vote on a proposed policy or legislation. With the European Citizens' Initiative, citizens can invite the commission to look at the proposed policy or legislation; it is not obliged to act. Citizen initiatives differ from referendums in which citizens only can accept or reject a law or policy proposed by parliament. Also, it has been stated by the European Commission that an ECI can only be the subject of the acceptance/creation of a law, but it cannot ask to reject a law. [70]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Commission</span> Executive branch of the European Union

The European Commission (EC) is the primary executive arm of the European Union (EU). It operates as a cabinet government, with a number of members of the Commission corresponding to two thirds of the number of member states, unless the European Council, acting unanimously, decides to alter this number. The current number of Commissioners is 27, including the President. It includes an administrative body of about 32,000 European civil servants. The commission is divided into departments known as Directorates-General (DGs) that can be likened to departments or ministries each headed by a Director-General who is responsible to a Commissioner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popular initiative</span> Popular voter petition systems

A popular initiative is a form of direct democracy by which a petition meeting certain hurdles can force a legal procedure on a proposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Ombudsman</span> Ombudsman for the European Union

The European Ombudsman is an inter-institutional body of the European Union that holds the institutions, bodies and agencies of the EU to account, and promotes good administration. The Ombudsman helps people, businesses and organisations facing problems with the EU administration by investigating complaints, as well as by proactively looking into broader systemic issues. The current Ombudsman is Emily O'Reilly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Languages of the European Union</span>

The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages, of which three – English, French and German – were considered "procedural" languages, but this notion was abandoned by the European Commission. Today, English and French are used in the day-to-day workings of the institutions of the EU. Institutions have the right to define the linguistic regime of their working, but the Commission and a number of other institutions have not done so, as indicated by several judicial rulings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diana Wallis</span> British politician

Diana Paulette Wallis, is a British former Liberal Democrat Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for Yorkshire and the Humber. Wallis was first elected in 1999 and re-elected in 2004 and in 2009. She resigned her seat in January 2012 and went on to pursue academic, legal and mediation-related activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European political party</span> European-level transnational political party

A European political party, formerly known as a political party at European level and informally as a Europarty, is a type of European political alliance recognised as a political party operating transnationally in Europe and within the institutions of the European Union (EU). They are regulated and funded by EU Regulation 1141/2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations, and their operations are supervised by the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (APPF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cecilia Malmström</span> Swedish politician (born 1968)

Anna Cecilia Malmström is a Swedish politician who served as European Commissioner for Trade from 2014 to 2019. She previously served as European Commissioner for Home Affairs from 2010 to 2014 and Minister for European Union Affairs from 2006 to 2010. She was a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from Sweden from 1999 to 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union citizenship</span> Legal right conferred to citizens of EU member states

European Union citizenship is afforded to all nationals of member states of the European Union (EU). It was formally created with the adoption of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, at the same time as the creation of the EU. EU citizenship is additional to, as it does not replace, national citizenship. It affords EU citizens with rights, freedoms and legal protections available under EU law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union legislative procedure</span> Procedures for the adoption of legislation in the European Union

The European Union adopts legislation through a variety of legislative procedures. The procedure used for a given legislative proposal depends on the policy area in question. Most legislation needs to be proposed by the European Commission and approved by the Council of the European Union and European Parliament to become law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European political foundation</span> European-level transnational think tank

A European political foundation, formerly known as a political foundation at European level, is a type of political foundation affiliated to, but independent from, a European political party, and operating transnationally in Europe and within the institutions of the European Union (EU).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Area of freedom, security and justice</span> EUs home affairs and justice policies

The area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) of the European Union (EU) is a policy domain concerning home affairs and migration, justice as well as fundamental rights, developed to address the challenges posed to internal security by collateral effects of the free movement of people and goods in the absence of border controls or customs inspection throughout the Schengen Area, as well as to safeguard adherence to the common European values through ensuring that the fundamental rights of people are respected across the EU.

Fraternité 2020 (F2020) was a European Citizens' Initiative initiated at the Young European Citizens' Convention, Cluny 2010. The convention was awarded French national winner of the European Charlemagne Youth Prize in 2011. F2020's objective was to enhance EU exchange programmes such as Erasmus or the European Voluntary Service (EVS) to contribute to a united Europe based on solidarity among citizens. It was declared Europe's very first ECI on May 9, 2012, and boasts registration number ECI(2012)000001 in the Commission's ECI database. To be successful, it needed to collect 1 million signatures before November 1, 2013. This target was not reached. The number of signatures actually collected was 71,057.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership</span> Proposed free trade agreement between the EU and the US

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was a proposed trade agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States, with the aim of promoting trade and multilateral economic growth. According to Karel de Gucht, European Commissioner for Trade between 2010 and 2014, the TTIP would have been the largest bilateral trade initiative ever negotiated, not only because it would have involved the two largest economic areas in the world but also "because of its potential global reach in setting an example for future partners and agreements".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy International eV</span> International non-governmental organisation

Democracy International e.V. is an international non-governmental organisation (NGO) working on strengthening direct democracy and citizens' participation at local level, in the nation states and on the global level. Democracy International has been existing as a loose network of democracy activists since 2002. The organisation was formally established in June 2011 as a registered membership association according to German non-profit law. Democracy International is politically independent and funded by membership fees and individual donations. The headquarters are in Cologne, Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaties of the European Union</span>

The Treaties of the European Union are a set of international treaties between the European Union (EU) member states which sets out the EU's constitutional basis. They establish the various EU institutions together with their remit, procedures and objectives. The EU can only act within the competences granted to it through these treaties and amendment to the treaties requires the agreement and ratification of every single signatory.

Right2Water is a campaign to commit the European Union and member states to implement the human right to water and sanitation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union lobbying</span> Lobbying in the European Union

Lobbying in the European Union, also referred to officially as European interest representation, is the activity of representatives of diverse interest groups or lobbies who attempt to influence the executive and legislative authorities of the European Union through public relations or public affairs work. The Treaty of Lisbon introduced a new dimension of lobbying at the European level that is different from most national lobbying. At the national level, lobbying is more a matter of personal and informal relations between the officials of national authorities, but lobbying at the European Union level is increasingly a part of the political decision-making process and thus part of the legislative process. 'European interest representation' is part of a new participatory democracy within the European Union. The first step towards specialised regulation of lobbying in the European Union was a Written Question tabled by Alman Metten, in 1989. In 1991, Marc Galle, Chairman of the Committee on the Rules of Procedure, the Verification of Credentials and Immunities, was appointed to submit proposals for a Code of conduct and a register of lobbyists. Today lobbying in the European Union is an integral and important part of decision-making in the EU. From year to year lobbying regulation in the EU is constantly improving and the number of lobbyists is increasing.

The Conference on the Future of Europe was a proposal of the European Commission and the European Parliament, announced at the end of 2019, with the aim of looking at the medium- to long-term future of the EU and what reforms should be made to its policies and institutions. It is intended that the Conference should involve citizens, including a significant role for young people, civil society, and European institutions as equal partners and last for two years. It will be jointly organised by the European Parliament, the EU Council and the European Commission. On 19 April 2021, the multilingual digital platform of the Conference futureu.europa.eu was launched.

Participatory democracy "is founded on the direct action of citizens who exercise some power and decide issues affecting their lives". Participatory democracy refers to mechanisms through which citizens are involved in public decision-making processes, not as an alternative to representative democracy but as a complement to it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations</span> Body in charge of monitoring European political parties and foundations

The Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (APPF) is a body of the European Union in charge of registering, controlling and imposing sanctions on European political parties and European political foundations.

References

  1. ↑ "Homepage – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". European Commission . 20 December 2013. Archived from the original on 12 January 2014. Retrieved 13 November 2020.
  2. ↑ "Home – European citizens' initiative – portal". European Commission . 13 November 2020. Archived from the original on 1 November 2020. Retrieved 13 November 2020.
  3. ↑ Michael Efler: How the Convention got convinced , 27 June 2003, citizens-initiative.eu
  4. ↑ Michael Efler: A rollercoaster ride toward the ECI , 27 June 2003, democracy-international.org
  5. ↑ "GREEN PAPER on a European Citizens' Initiative". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  6. ↑ "Introduction". europarl.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 14 August 2015. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  7. ↑ "Regulation (EU) No. 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European citizens' initiative". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 26 July 2021.
  8. ↑ "Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2019/1799 laying down technical specifications for online collection systems pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2020/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European citizens' initiative". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  9. ↑ "First European Citizens' Initiative delivered to Commissioner Dalli". Greenpeace.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  10. ↑ "Open initiatives – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  11. ↑ "Right to water: attend the first EP hearing for a Citizens' Initiative – News – European Parliament". Europarl.europa.eu. 14 February 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  12. ↑ "Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative "Water and sanitation are a human right! Water is a public good, not a commodity!"". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  13. ↑ "Evaluation of the Drinking Water Directive 98/83/EC" (PDF). Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  14. 1 2 "Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative "One of Us"". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  15. ↑ "European Parliament hearing on "One of Us" European Citizens' Initiative | News | European Parliament" . Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  16. ↑ Judgment of the Court: Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v European Commission., 19 December 2019
  17. ↑ "European Citizens' Initiatives – Events – AGRI – Committees – European Parliament". Europarl.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  18. ↑ "COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION on the European Citizens' Initiative "Stop Vivisection"" (PDF). Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  19. ↑ COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION on the European Citizens' Initiative "Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides"
  20. ↑ "EUR-Lex – 32019R1381 – EN – EUR-Lex".
  21. ↑ Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe
  22. ↑ "ECI Hearing on 'Minority Safepack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe' | European Citizens' Initiatives | Events | LIBE | Committees | European Parliament".
  23. ↑ "Register of Commission Documents".
  24. ↑ Initiative citoyenne européenne: une sixième initiative présentée avec succès à la Commission//Daily News 02 / 10 / 2020 European Commission
  25. ↑ "European Citizens' Initiative: Commission to propose phasing out of cages for farm animals". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  26. ↑ "The ECI Campaign joins End the Cage Age legal action". The ECI campaign. Retrieved 3 September 2024.
  27. ↑ "Refused requests for registration – European Citizens' Initiative register" . Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  28. ↑ "Refused request for registration – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  29. ↑ ""An ECI That Works! Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." / "My Voice against Nuclear Power"" (PDF). Ecithatworks.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  30. ↑ "Refused request for registration – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  31. ↑ "Question on Refused request for registration – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission" . Retrieved 12 November 2014.
  32. ↑ "European Citizens' Initiative against TTIP: Submission of complaint in the European Court of Justice". Stop-ttip.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  33. ↑ [Case T-754/14: Action brought on 10 November 2014 – Efler and Others v Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2015.034.01.0039.02.ENG] Eur-lex.europa.eu
  34. ↑ "'Stop TTIP' petition is legitimate, top EU court rules". Euractiv.com. 11 May 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  35. ↑ "L'Europe donne son feu vert à une action de pétition contre le TTIP". 4 July 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  36. ↑ "European Commission > European Citizens' Initiative" . Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  37. 1 2 Regulation of the EP and of the Council. Retrieved 30 January 2021.
  38. ↑ "How it works – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 6 September 2021.
  39. ↑ "Guide to the European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 11 March 2020. Retrieved 6 September 2021.
  40. ↑ "Citizens' committee – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  41. ↑ "Registration – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  42. ↑ "Competent national authorities that certify online collection systems – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  43. ↑ "Certification of online system – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  44. ↑ "Collection – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  45. ↑ "Competent national authorities that certify statements of support – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  46. ↑ "Verification of statements – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  47. ↑ "Submission of the initiative – The procedure step by step – European Citizens' Initiative – European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  48. ↑ "The ECI Campaign – 12 ways to build an ECI that works". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  49. ↑ "Democracy International – European Citizens' Initiative Reform". Democrary-international.org. 4 February 2015. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
  50. ↑ "ECI That Works! – Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative". Ecithatworks.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  51. ↑ "ECI Support Centre – ECAS". Ecas.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  52. ↑ ""An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." – Interview with Xavier Dutoit" (PDF). Ecithatworks.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  53. ↑ ""An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative." – Reinder Rustema – "Why the ECI needs a Community-Developed Online Collection System"" (PDF). Ecithatworks.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  54. ↑ ""An ECI That Works. Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens' Initiative."" (PDF). Ecithatworks.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  55. ↑ "ECI Software that Works! OpenECI is designed by and for ECI campaigners – European Citizens' Initiative – The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. 8 December 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  56. ↑ "European Parliament, "European Citizens' Initiative – First lessons of implementation"" (PDF). Europarl.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  57. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  58. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  59. ↑ "ECAS – "The European Citizens' Initiative Registration: Falling at the First Hurdle? Analysis of the registration requirements and the "subject matters" of the rejected ECIs"" (PDF). Ecas.org. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  60. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  61. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  62. ↑ "Ombudsman calls on Commission to make European Citizens' Initiative politically relevant". Ombudsman.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  63. ↑ "Decision of the European Ombudsman closing her own-initiative inquiry OI/9/2013/TN concerning the European Commission". Ombudsman.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  64. ↑ "Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative" (PDF). Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  65. ↑ "EESC, ECI Day 2015 General Report" (PDF). Eesc.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  66. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  67. ↑ "Opinion of the Committee on Petitions for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the European Citizens' Initiative". Europarl.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  68. ↑ "Opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the European Citizens' Initiative". Europarl.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  69. ↑ "The ECI Campaign". Citizens-initiative.eu. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  70. ↑ "Refusal of the Stop TTIP ICE". Ec.europa.eu. 10 September 2014. Retrieved 11 May 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.