Planetary health diet

Last updated
Example of a planetary diet meal recommended by the EAT-Lancet commission Planetary diet meal.png
Example of a planetary diet meal recommended by the EAT-Lancet commission

The planetary health diet, also called a planetary diet,planetarian diet, or EAT-Lancet diet, is a flexitarian diet created by the EAT-Lancet commission [1] [2] as part of a report released in The Lancet on 16 January 2019. [3] The aim of the report and the diet it developed is to create dietary paradigms that have the following aims: [2]

Contents

Recommendations

To achieve this, it has defined new recommendations on consuming meat, dairy, and starchy vegetables, specifically red meat. The aims of this are:

The planetary health diet recommendations have an optimal caloric intake and consist largely of a diversity of plant-based foods, and small amounts of animal source foods. They contain unsaturated rather than saturated fats, and limited amounts of refined grains, highly processed foods and added sugars.

Scientific targets for a planetary health diet, with possible ranges, for an intake of 2500 kcal/day.
FoodMacronutrient intake
(grams per day)
(possible range)
Caloric intake
(kcal per day)
ExampleComparison
Vegetables300 (200–600)78
Dairy foods 250 (0–500)153One cup of milk per day
Whole grains232811
Fruits200 (100–300)126
Tubers or Starchy vegetables 50 (0–100)39Two medium-sized potatoes or servings of cassava per week
Unsaturated oils40 (20–80)354
Added sugars31120Two tablespoons of honey per day
Palm oil6.8 (0–6.8)60
Lard or tallow5 (0 to 5)36
Protein sources:
Legumes 75 (0–100)284
Nuts50 (0–75)291
Chicken and other poultry2962One boneless, skinless chicken thigh every other day
Fish2840
Beef, lamb and pork1430One medium-size hamburger per weekTwice the average per capita consumption in South Asia, and the average amount of red meat eaten in Africa [5]
Eggs 1319One egg every third day (e.g., poached, made into pancakes, etc.)Half the egg consumption in Japan and China; [6] six times the egg consumption in India [7]

There are also other recommendations on the amounts of fruit, vegetables, legumes, grains, and oil. This is because the diet is created around a total intake of 2,500 calories a day (to discourage overeating). But the main focus is on meat, eggs, dairy, and starchy vegetables. The EAT-Lancet Commission describes the planetary health diet as a "flexitarian diet, which is largely plant-based but can optionally include modest amounts of fish, meat and dairy foods." [2]

There are full-fledged options with even 1600 kcal, such as MED_EAT-IT. [8]

Response

The UK newspaper The Guardian [9] and the US news outlet CNN [10] have given the diet positive coverage.

Harry Harris, writing in New Statesman , was wary of claims that the diet could transform the world's food system, saying, “It seems churlish to keep placing the onus for climate change onto individual's [sic] behaviour, when we know that 100 companies are responsible for 71 per cent of global emissions." [11]

The World Health Organization withdrew its sponsorship of the EAT-Lancet event following criticism from Gian Lorenzo Cornado, Italy's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Office at Geneva. [5] [12] Cornado said that adopting one dietary approach for the whole planet would destroy traditional diets and cultural heritage, and that reducing meat and candy consumption would cause the loss of millions of jobs. [5]

In 2025, it was revealed that a PR firm sponsored by the dairy and meat industry orchestrated journalists and influencers for negative coverage. These groups were briefed to frame the diet as "radical," "out of touch," and "hypocritical". [13]

Cost

The planetary diet may not solve the problems of people who cannot afford to eat meat, eggs, and dairy products regularly, and whose health would benefit from introducing animal-source foods. [14] Researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute and Tufts University calculated that nearly 1.6 billion people, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, could not afford the cost of the EAT-Lancet reference diet. [15] [16] A 2020 study found that the planetary diet is more affordable than the typical Australian diet. [17]

A 2020 comparison study found agreements between the planetary diet and the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The differences are in the recommended amounts of fruit, nuts, red meat, seeds, starchy vegetables and whole grains. [18]

A 2020 comparison study of the average Indian diet with the planetary diet found that the average Indian diet is considered unhealthy because of excessive consumption of cereals and processed foods, with insufficient protein, fruits, and vegetables. [19] [20]

References

  1. "The EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health". EAT. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Lancet Commission Summary Report" (PDF).
  3. "Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems". The Lancet. 2019-01-16. Retrieved 2019-05-23.
  4. "Plant-Rich Diets". Project Drawdown. 2020-02-06. Retrieved 2020-12-05.
  5. 1 2 3 Torjesen, Ingrid (9 April 2019). "WHO pulls support from initiative promoting global move to plant based foods" . BMJ. 365: l1700. doi:10.1136/bmj.l1700. PMID   30967377. S2CID   106411182 . Retrieved 30 August 2019.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  6. "Countries That Consume the Most Eggs". WorldAtlas. 16 July 2018. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
  7. Anandan, Sanjevi (2019-08-23). "Study: India's meat and egg consumption very low". Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
  8. Tucci, Massimiliano; Martini, Daniela; Vinelli, Valentina; Biscotti, Paola; Porrini, Marisa; Del Bo', Cristian; Riso, Patrizia (2024). "The MED_EAT-IT approach: A modelling study to develop feasible, sustainable and nutritionally targeted dietary patterns based on the Planetary health diet". Current Research in Food Science. 8: 100765. doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100765. ISSN   2665-9271. PMC   11109324 . PMID   38779344.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  9. Carrington, Damian (2019-01-16). "New plant-focused diet would 'transform' planet's future, say scientists". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2019-02-08.
  10. Nina Avramova (16 January 2019). "This diet could help save lives, and the planet". CNN. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
  11. "Why a planetary health diet probably won't save the world". www.newstatesman.com. 21 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
  12. "New Permanent Representative of Italy Presents Credentials to the Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva". United Nations Office at Geneva. 2 August 2018.
  13. Carlile, Clare (2025-04-11). "Revealed: Meat Industry Behind Attacks on Flagship Climate-Friendly Diet Report". DeSmog. Retrieved 2025-04-11.
  14. Adesogan AT, Havelaar AH, McKune SL, Eilitta M, Dahl GE (2020). "Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters". Global Food Security. 25: 100325. Bibcode:2020GlFS...2500325A. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100325 .{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  15. Hirvonen K, Bai Y, Headey D, Masters WA (2019-11-08). "Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis". The Lancet Global Health. 8 (1): e59 –e66. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4. PMC   7024996 . PMID   31708415.
  16. "Intended to help human, planetary health, EAT-Lancet diet too costly for 1.6 billion people". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
  17. Goulding T, Lindberg R, Russell CG (2020). "The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study". Nutrition Journal . 19 (19): 109. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00606-z . PMC   7528590 . PMID   32998734.
  18. Blackstone, Nicole Tichenor; Conrad, Zach (2020). "Comparing the Recommended Eating Patterns of the EAT-Lancet Commission and Dietary Guidelines for Americans: Implications for Sustainable Nutrition". Current Developments in Nutrition . 4 (3): nzaa015. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa015 . PMC   7053404 . PMID   32154501.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. Sharma Manika; Kishore, Avinash, Kishore; Roy, Devesh; Joshi, Kuhu (2020). "A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet". BMC Public Health. 20 (812): 812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08951-8 . PMC   7260780 . PMID   32471408.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. Manika Sharma, Avinash Kishore, Devesh Roy, Kuhu Joshi and Khiem Nguyen. (2020). "Indian Diets Fall Short of Eat-Lancet Reference Recommendations for Human and Planetary Health". CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health. Retrieved 22 November 2020.