Proto-Celtic | |
---|---|
PC, Common Celtic | |
Reconstruction of | Celtic languages |
Region | Central or Western Europe |
Era | ca. 1300–800 BC |
Reconstructed ancestor |
Part of a series on |
Indo-European topics |
---|
Proto-Celtic, or Common Celtic, is the hypothetical ancestral proto-language of all known Celtic languages, and a descendant of Proto-Indo-European. It is not attested in writing but has been partly reconstructed through the comparative method. Proto-Celtic is generally thought to have been spoken between 1300 and 800 BC, after which it began to split into different languages. Proto-Celtic is often associated with the Urnfield culture and particularly with the Hallstatt culture. Celtic languages share common features with Italic languages that are not found in other branches of Indo-European, suggesting the possibility of an earlier Italo-Celtic linguistic unity.
Proto-Celtic is currently being reconstructed through the comparative method by relying on later Celtic languages. Though Continental Celtic presents much substantiation for Proto-Celtic phonology, and some for its morphology, recorded material is too scanty to allow a secure reconstruction of syntax, though some complete sentences are recorded in the Continental Gaulish and Celtiberian. So, the main sources for reconstruction come from Insular Celtic languages with the oldest literature found in Old Irish [1] and Middle Welsh, [2] dating back to authors flourishing in the 6th century AD.
Proto-Celtic is usually dated to the Late Bronze Age, ca. 1200–900 BC. [3] The fact that it is possible to reconstruct a Proto-Celtic word for 'iron' (traditionally reconstructed as *īsarnom) has long been taken as an indication that the divergence into individual Celtic languages did not start until the Iron Age (8th century BC to 1st century BC); otherwise, descendant languages would have developed their own, unrelated words for their metal. However, Schumacher [4] and Schrijver [5] suggest a date for Proto-Celtic as early as the 13th century BC, the time of the Canegrate culture, in northwest Italy, and the Urnfield culture in Central Europe, implying that the divergence may have already started in the Bronze Age.[ why? ]
The phonological changes from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) to Proto-Celtic (PC) may be summarized as follows. [6] The changes are roughly in chronological order, with changes that operate on the outcome of earlier ones appearing later in the list.
These changes are shared by several other Indo-European branches.
The following sound changes are shared with the Italic languages in particular, and are cited in support of the Italo-Celtic hypothesis. [7]
One change shows non-exact parallels in Italic: vocalization of syllabic resonants next to laryngeals depending on the environment. Similar developments appear in Italic, but for the syllabic nasals *m̩, *n̩, the result is Proto-Italic *əm, *ən (> Latin em ~ im, en ~ in).
PIE | PC | Example | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | Proto-Celtic | Old Irish | Welsh | |||||
*p | *ɸ | *ph₂tḗr | *ɸatīr | father | athir | edrydd | cf. home (< *ɸatrijo-) | |
*t | *t | *tréyes | *trīs | three | trí | tri | ||
*k, ḱ | *k | *kh₂n̥-e- *ḱm̥tom | *kan-o- *kantom | sing hundred | canaid cét/kʲeːd/ | canu cant | ||
*kʷ | *kʷ | *kʷetwores | *kʷetwares | four | ceth(a)ir | pedwar | ||
*b | *b | *h₂ébōl | *abalom | apple | uball | afal | ||
*d | *d | *derḱ- | *derk- | see | derc | eye | drych | sight |
*g, ǵ | *g | *gleh₁i- *ǵen-u- | *gli-na- *genu- | to glue jaw | glen(a)id giun, gin | (he) sticks fast mouth | glynu gên | adhere jaw |
*gʷ | *b | *gʷenh₂ | *bena | woman | ben | O.W. ben | ||
*bʰ | *b | *bʰére- | *ber-o- | carry | berid | (he) carries | adfer cymeryd [12] | to restore to take |
*dʰ | *d | *dʰeh₁i- | *di-na- | suck | denait | they suck | dynu, denu | |
*gʰ, ǵʰ | *g | *gʰh₁bʰ-(e)y- *ǵʰelH-ro- | *gab-i- *galaro- | take sickness | ga(i)bid galar | (he) takes sickness | gafael galar | hold grief |
*gʷʰ | *gʷ | *gʷʰn̥- | *gʷan-o- | kill, wound | gonaid | (he) wounds, slays | gwanu | stab |
*s | *s | *sen-o- | *senos | old | sen | hen | ||
*m | *m | *méh₂tēr | *mātīr | mother | máthir | modryb | cf. aunt | |
*n | *n | *h₂nép-ōt- | *neɸūts | nephew | niad | nai | ||
*l | *l | *leyǵʰ- | *lig-e/o- | lick | ligid | (he) licks | llyo, llyfu | |
*r | *r | *h₃rēǵ-s | *rīgs | king | rí (gen. ríg) | rhi | ||
*j | *j | *h₂yuh₁n-ḱós | *juwankos | young | óac | ieuanc | ||
*w | *w | *h₂wl̥h₁tí- | *wlatis | rulership | flaith | gwlad | country |
PIE | PC | Example | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | Old Irish | Welsh | ||||||
*a, *h₂e | *a | *h₂ep-h₃ōn- | *abū acc. *abonen | river | aub | afon | |||
*ā, *eh₂ | *ā | *bʰréh₂tēr | *brātīr | brother | bráthir | brawd | |||
*e, h₁e | *e | *sen-o- | *senos | old | sen | hen | |||
*H | between consonants [13] | *a | *ph₂tḗr | *ɸatīr | father | athir | edrydd | cf. home | |
*ē, eh₁ | *ī | *weh₁-ro- | *wīros | true | fír | gwir | |||
*o, Ho, h₃e | *o | *Hroth₂o- | *rotos | wheel | roth | rhod | |||
*ō, eh₃ | in final syllable | *ū | *h₂nép-ōt- | *neɸūts | nephew | niæ | nai | ||
elsewhere | *ā | *deh₃no- | *dāno- | gift | dán | dawn | |||
*i | *i | *gʷih₃-tu- | *bitus | world | bith | byd | |||
*ī, iH | *ī | *rīmeh₂ | *rīmā | number | rím | rhif | |||
*ai, h₂ei, eh₂i | *ai | *kaikos *seh₂itlo- | *kaikos *saitlo- | blind age | cáech — | one-eyed — | coeg hoedl | empty, one-eyed age | |
*(h₁)ei, ēi, eh₁i | *ei | *deywos | *deiwos | god | día | duw | |||
*oi, ōi, h₃ei, eh₃i | *oi | *oynos | *oinos | one | óen oín; áen aín | un | |||
*u | before wa | o | *h₂yuh₁n-ḱós | *juwankos > *jowankos | young | óac | ieuanc | ||
elsewhere | *u | *srutos | *srutos | stream | sruth | ffrwd | |||
*ū, uH | *ū | *ruHneh₂ | *rūnā | mystery | rún | rhin | |||
*au, h₂eu, eh₂u | *au | *tausos | *tausos | silent | táue | silence (*tausijā) | taw | ||
*(h₁)eu, ēu, eh₁u; *ou, ōu, h₃eu, eh₃u | *ou | *tewteh₂ *gʷeh₃-u-s | *toutā *bows | people cow | túath bó | tud M.W. bu, biw | |||
*l̥ | before stops | *li | *pl̥th₂nós | *ɸlitanos | wide | lethan | llydan | ||
before other consonants | *al | *kl̥h₁- | *kaljākos | rooster | cailech (Ogham gen. caliaci) | ceiliog | |||
*r̩ | before stops | *ri | *bʰr̩ti- | *briti- | act of bearing; mind | breth, brith | bryd | ||
before other consonants | *ar | *mr̩wos | *marwos | dead | marb | marw | |||
*m̩ | *am | *dm̩-nh₂- | *damna- | subdue | M.Ir. damnaid | he ties, fastens, binds | — | ||
*n̩ | *an | *h₃dn̥t- | *dant | tooth | dét/dʲeːd/ | dant | |||
*l̩H | before obstruents | *la | *h₂wlh₁tí- | *wlatis | lordship | flaith | gwlad | country | |
before sonorants | *lā | *pl̩Hmeh₂ | *ɸlāmā | hand | lám | llaw | |||
*r̩H | before obstruents | *ra | *mr̩Htom | *mratom | betrayal | mrath | brad | ||
before sonorants | *rā | *ǵr̩Hnom | *grānom | grain | grán | grawn | |||
*m̩H | (presumably with same distribution as above) | *am/mā | *dm̩h₂-ye/o- | *damje/o- | to tame | daimid fodam- | daimid - | goddef | endure, suffer |
*n̩H | *an/nā | *ǵn̩h₃to- ? | *gnātos | known | gnáth | gnawd | customary |
The following consonants have been reconstructed for Proto-Celtic (PC):
Manner | Voicing | Bilabial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
plain | labialized | |||||
Plosive | voiceless | t | k | kʷ | ||
voiced | b | d | ɡ | ɡʷ | ||
Fricative | ɸ | s | x | |||
Nasal | m | n | ||||
Approximant | l | j | w | |||
Trill | r |
Eska has recently proposed that PC stops allophonically manifest similarly to those in English. Voiceless stop phonemes /t k/ were aspirated word-initially except when preceded by /s/, hence aspirate allophones [tʰ kʰ]. And unaspirated voiced stops /b d ɡ/ were devoiced to [p t k] word-initially. [14] [15]
This allophony may be reconstructed to PC from the following evidence: [14] [15]
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) voiced aspirate stops *bʰ, *dʰ, *gʰ/ǵʰ, merge with *b, *d, *g/ǵ in PC. The voiced aspirate labiovelar *gʷʰ did not merge with *gʷ, though: plain *gʷ became PC *b, while aspirated *gʷʰ became *gʷ. Thus, PIE *gʷen- 'woman' became Old Irish and Old Welsh ben, but PIE *gʷʰn̥- 'to kill, wound' became Old Irish gonaid and Welsh gwanu.
PIE *p is lost in PC, apparently going through the stages *ɸ (possibly a stage *[pʰ]) [14] and *h (perhaps seen in the name Hercynia if this is of Celtic origin) before being completely lost word-initially and between vowels. Next to consonants, PC *ɸ underwent different changes: the clusters *ɸs and *ɸt became *xs and *xt respectively already in PC. PIE *sp- became Old Irish s (f- when lenited, exactly as for PIE *sw-) and Brythonic f; while Schrijver 1995 , p. 348 argues there was an intermediate stage *sɸ- (in which *ɸ remained an independent phoneme until after Proto-Insular Celtic had diverged into Goidelic and Brythonic), McCone 1996 , pp. 44–45 finds it more economical to believe that *sp- remained unchanged in PC, that is, the change *p to *ɸ did not happen when *s preceded. (Similarly, Grimm's law did not apply to *p, t, k after *s in Germanic, and the same exception occurred again in the High German consonant shift.)
Proto-Celtic | Old Irish | Welsh |
---|---|---|
*laɸs- > *laxs- 'shine' | las-aid | llach-ar |
*seɸtam > *sextam 'seven' | secht | saith |
*sɸeret- or *speret- 'heel' | seir | ffêr |
In Gaulish and the Brittonic languages, the Proto-Indo-European *kʷ phoneme becomes a new *p sound. Thus, Gaulish petuar[ios], Welsh pedwar "four", but Old Irish cethair and Latin quattuor. Insofar as this new /p/ fills the gap in the phoneme inventory which was left by the disappearance of the equivalent stop in PIE, we may think of this as a chain shift.
The terms P-Celtic and Q-Celtic are useful for grouping Celtic languages based on the way they handle this one phoneme. But a simple division into P- / Q-Celtic may be untenable, as it does not do justice to the evidence of the ancient Continental Celtic languages. The many unusual shared innovations among the Insular Celtic languages are often also presented as evidence against a P- vs Q-Celtic division, but they may instead reflect a common substratum influence from the pre-Celtic languages of Britain and Ireland,, or simply continuing contact between the insular languages; in either case they would be irrelevant to the genetic classification of Celtic languages.
Q-Celtic languages may also have /p/ in loan words, though in early borrowings from Welsh into Primitive Irish, /kʷ/ was used by sound substitution due to a lack of a /p/ phoneme at the time:
Gaelic póg "kiss" was a later borrowing (from the second word of the Latin phrase osculum pacis "kiss of peace") at a stage where p was borrowed directly as p, without substituting c.
The PC vowel system is highly comparable to that reconstructed for PIE by Antoine Meillet. The following monophthongs are reconstructed:
The following diphthongs have also been reconstructed:
Type | With -i | With -u |
---|---|---|
With a- | ai | au |
With o- | oi | ou |
The morphological (structure) of nouns and adjectives demonstrates no arresting alterations from the parent language. Proto-Celtic is believed to have had nouns in three genders, three numbers and five to eight cases. The genders were masculine, feminine and neuter; the numbers were singular, plural and dual. The number of cases is a subject of contention: [16] while Old Irish may have only five, the evidence from Continental Celtic is considered[ by whom? ] rather unambiguous despite appeals to archaic retentions or morphological leveling. These cases were nominative, vocative, accusative, dative, genitive, ablative, locative and instrumental.
Nouns fall into nine or so declensions, depending on stem. There are *o-stems, *ā-stems, *i-stems, *u-stems, dental stems, velar stems, nasal stems, *r-stems and *s-stems.
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *makkʷos | *makkʷou | *makkʷoi |
Vocative | *makkʷe | *makkʷou | *makkʷūs |
Accusative | *makkʷom | *makkʷou | *makkʷūs |
Genitive | *makkʷī | *makkʷūs | *makkʷom |
Dative | *makkʷūi | *makkʷobom | *makkʷobos |
Ablative | *makkʷū | *makkʷobim | *makkʷobis |
Instrumental | *makkʷū | *makkʷobim | *makkʷūs |
Locative | *makkʷei | *makkʷou | *makkʷobis |
However, Celtiberian shows -o- stem genitives ending in -o rather than -ī: aualo "[son] of Avalos". [17] Also note that the genitive singular does not match Proto-Indo-European's -osyo, which would have yielded -osjo.
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *dūnom | *dūnou | *dūnā |
Vocative | *dūnom | *dūnou | *dūnā |
Accusative | *dūnom | *dūnou | *dūnā |
Genitive | *dūnī | *dūnūs | *dūnom |
Dative | *dūnūi | *dūnobom | *dūnobos |
Ablative | *dūnū | *dūnobim | *dūnobis |
Instrumental | *dūnū | *dūnobim | *dūnūs |
Locative | *dūnei | *dūnou | *dūnobis |
As in the masculine paradigm, the genitive singular does not match Proto-Indo-European's -osyo, which would have yielded -osjo.
E.g. *ɸlāmā 'hand' (feminine) (Old Irish lám; Welsh llaw, Cornish leuv, Old Breton lom)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *ɸlāmā | *ɸlāmai | *ɸlāmās |
Vocative | *ɸlāmā | *ɸlāmai | *ɸlāmās |
Accusative | *ɸlāmām | *ɸlāmai | *ɸlāmās |
Genitive | *ɸlāmās | *ɸlāmajous | *ɸlāmom |
Dative | *ɸlāmāi | *ɸlāmābom | *ɸlāmābos |
Ablative | *ɸlāmī | *ɸlāmābim | *ɸlāmābis |
Instrumental | *ɸlāmī | *ɸlāmābim | *ɸlāmābis |
Locative | *ɸlāmāi | *ɸlāmābim | *ɸlāmābis |
E.g. *sūlis 'sight, view, eye' (feminine) (Brittonic sulis ~ Old Irish súil)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *sūlis | *sūlī | *sūlīs |
Vocative | *sūli | *sūlī | *sūlīs |
Accusative | *sūlim | *sūlī | *sūlīs |
Genitive | *sūleis | *sūljous | *sūljom |
Dative | *sūlei | *sūlibom | *sūlibos |
Ablative | *sūlī | *sūlibim | *sūlibis |
Instrumental | *sūlī | *sūlibim | *sūlibis |
Locative | *sūlī | *sūlibim | *sūlibis |
E.g. *mori 'body of water, sea' (neuter) (Gaulish Mori- ~ Old Irish muir ~ Welsh môr)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *mori | *morī | *moryā |
Vocative | *mori | *morī | *moryā |
Accusative | *mori | *morī | *moryā |
Genitive | *moreis | *moryous | *moryom |
Dative | *morei | *moribom | *moribos |
Ablative | *morī | *moribim | *moribis |
Instrumental | *morī | *moribim | *moribis |
Locative | *morī | *moribim | *moribis |
E.g. *bitus 'world, existence' (masculine) (Gaulish Bitu- ~ Old Irish bith ~ Welsh byd ~ Breton bed)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *bitus | *bitou | *bitowes |
Vocative | *bitu | *bitou | *bitowes |
Accusative | *bitum | *bitou | *bitūs |
Genitive | *bitous | *bitowou | *bitowom |
Dative | *bitou | *bitubom | *bitubos |
Ablative | *bitū | *bitubim | *bitubis |
Instrumental | *bitū | *bitubim | *bitubis |
Locative | *bitū | *bitubim | *bitubis |
E.g. *beru "rotisserie spit" (neuter)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *beru | *berou | *berwā |
Vocative | *beru | *berou | *berwā |
Accusative | *beru | *berou | *berwā |
Genitive | *berous | *berowou | *berowom |
Dative | *berou | *berubom | *berubos |
Ablative | *berū | *berubim | *berubis |
Instrumental | *berū | *berubim | *berubis |
Locative | *berū | *berubim | *berubis |
Before the *-s of the nominative singular, a velar consonant was fricated to *-x : *rīg- "king" > *rīxs. Likewise, final *-d devoiced to *-t-: *druwid- "druid" > *druwits. [18]
E.g. *rīxs "king" (masculine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *rīxs | *rīge | *rīges |
Vocative | *rīxs | *rīge | *rīges |
Accusative | *rīgam | *rīge | *rīgās |
Genitive | *rīgos | *rīgou | *rīgom |
Dative | *rīgei | *rīgobom | *rīgobos |
Ablative | *rīgī | *rīgobim | *rīgobis |
Instrumental | *rīge | *rīgobim | *rīgobis |
Locative | *rīgi | *rīgobim | *rīgobis |
E.g. *druwits "druid" (masculine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *druwits | *druwide | *druwides |
Vocative | *druwits | *druwide | *druwides |
Accusative | *druwidem | *druwide | *druwidās |
Genitive | *druwidos | *druwidou | *druwidom |
Dative | *druwidei | *druwidobom | *druwidobos |
Ablative | *druwidī | *druwidobim | *druwidobis |
Instrumental | *druwide | *druwidobim | *druwidobis |
Locative | *druwidi | *druwidobim | *druwidobis |
E.g. *karants "friend" (masculine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *karants | *karante | *karantes |
Vocative | *karants | *karante | *karantes |
Accusative | *karantam | *karante | *karantās |
Genitive | *karantos | *karantou | *karantom |
Dative | *karantei | *karantobom | *karantobos |
Ablative | *karantī | *karantobim | *karantobis |
Instrumental | *karante | *karantobim | *karantobis |
Locative | *karanti | *karantobim | *karantobis |
Generally, nasal stems end in *-on-; this becomes *-ū in the nominative singular: *abon- "river" > *abū.
E.g. *abū "river" (feminine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *abū | *abone | *abones |
Vocative | *abū | *abone | *abones |
Accusative | *abonam | *abone | *abonās |
Genitive | *abonos | *abonou | *abonom |
Dative | *abonei | *abnobom | *abnobos |
Ablative | *abonī | *abnobim | *abnobis |
Instrumental | *abone | *abnobim | *abnobis |
Locative | *aboni | *abnobim | *abnobis |
E.g. *anman "name" (neuter)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *anman | *anmanī | *anmanā |
Vocative | *anman | *anmanī | *anmanā |
Accusative | *anman | *anmanī | *anmanā |
Genitive | *anmēs | *anmanou | *anmanom |
Dative | *anmanei | *anmambom | *anmambos |
Ablative | *anmanī | *anmambim | *anmambis |
Instrumental | *anmane | *anmambim | *anmambis |
Locative | *anmani | *anmambim | *anmambis |
Generally,*s-stems contain an *-es-, which becomes *-os in the nominative singular: *teges- 'house' > *tegos.
E.g. *tegos "house" (neuter)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *tegos | *tegese | *tegesa |
Vocative | *tegos | *tegese | *tegesa |
Accusative | *tegos | *tegese | *tegesa |
Genitive | *tegesos | *tegesou | *tegesom |
Dative | *tegesi | *tegesobom | *tegesobos |
Ablative | *tegesī | *tegesobim | *tegesobis |
Instrumental | *tegese | *tegesobim | *tegesobis |
Locative | *tegesi | *tegesobim | *tegesobis |
E.g. *ɸatīr 'father' (masculine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *ɸatīr | *ɸatere | *ɸateres |
Vocative | *ɸatīr | *ɸatere | *ɸateres |
Accusative | *ɸateram | *ɸatere | *ɸaterās |
Genitive | *ɸatros | *ɸatrou | *ɸatrom |
Dative | *ɸatrei | *ɸatrebom | *ɸatrebos |
Ablative | *ɸatrī | *ɸatrebim | *ɸatrebis |
Instrumental | *ɸatre | *ɸatrebim | *ɸatrebis |
Locative | *ɸatri | *ɸatrebim | *ɸatrebis |
E.g. *mātīr 'mother' (feminine)
Case | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | *mātīr | *mātere | *māteres |
Vocative | *mātīr | *mātere | *māteres |
Accusative | *māteram | *mātere | *māterās |
Genitive | *mātros | *mātrou | *mātrom |
Dative | *mātrei | *mātrebom | *mātrebos |
Ablative | *mātrī | *mātrebim | *mātrebis |
Instrumental | *mātre | *mātrebim | *mātrebis |
Locative | *mātri | *mātrebim | *mātrebis |
The following personal pronouns in Celtic can be reconstructed as follows: [19] : 220–221 [20] : 281
Case | First-person | Second-person | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |
Nominative | *mī | *snī | *tū | *swī |
Accusative | *me [* 1] | *snos | *tu | *swes |
Genitive | *mene [* 2] | ? | *towe | ? |
The following third-person pronouns in Proto-Celtic may also be reconstructed. [21] : 62 [19] : 220
Case | Singular | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Masculine | Feminine | Neuter | ||
Nominative | *es, *ēs | *sī | *ed | *eyes |
Accusative | *em | *seyam? *sīm? | *sūs | |
Genitive | *esyo | *esyās | *esyo | *ēsom? *esom? |
Dative Instrumental Locative | *e(s)yōi | *esyāi | *e(s)yōi | *ēbis |
Forms of the masculine singular relative pronoun *yo- can be found in the first Botorrita plaque: The form io-s in line 10 is the nominative singular masculine of the relative pronoun from Proto-Indo-European *yo- (Sanskrit ya-, Greek hos), which shows up in Old Irish only as the aspiration for leniting relative verb forms. Line 7 has the accusative singular io-m and the dative singular io-mui of the same root. [22]
Adjectives in Proto-Celtic had positive, comparative, superlative and equative degrees of comparison. [23]
Four inflection classes for positive-degree adjectives are known. Most adjectives belonged to the o-ā class, in which the adjectives inflected like masculine o-stems, neuter o-stems and feminine ā-stems when agreeing with nouns of their respective genders. A much smaller minority of adjectives were i- and u-stems. [23]
Consonant-stem adjectives also existed but were vanishingly rare, with only relics in Old Irish like té "hot" < *teɸents.
The comparative degree was formed on most adjectives by attaching *-yūs to the adjective stem. For instance, *senos "old" would have a comparative *senyūs "older". However, some Caland system adjectives instead had a comparative ending in *-is, which was then extended to *-ais. For example, *ɸlitanos "wide" had a comparative *ɸletais. [24]
The superlative was formed by simply attaching *-isamos to the adjective stem. In some adjectives where the stem ends in *s, the suffix is truncated to *-(s)amos by haplology. [24] Thus, *senos "old" would have a superlative *senisamos "oldest" but *trexsnos (stem *trexs-) would have a superlative *trexsamos.
From comparison between early Old Irish and Gaulish forms it seems that Continental and Insular Celtic verbs developed differently and so the study of Irish and Welsh may have unduly weighted past opinion of Proto-Celtic verb morphology.[ citation needed ] It can be inferred from Gaulish and Celtiberian as well as Insular Celtic that the Proto-Celtic verb had at least three moods:
and four tenses:
A probable optative mood also features in Gaulish (tixsintor) and an infinitive (with a characteristic ending -unei) in Celtiberian. [25] [26]
Verbs were formed by adding suffixes to a verbal stem. The stem might be thematic or athematic, an open or a closed syllable.
The primary endings in Proto-Celtic were as follows. They were used to form the present, future, and subjunctive conjugations. [19]
Person and number | Basic endings | Thematic present | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Active | Mediopassive | Active | Mediopassive | |
1st sg. | *-ū(thematic) *-mi(athematic) | *-ūr | *-ū | *-ūr |
2nd sg. | *-si | *-tar | *-esi | *-etar |
3rd sg. | *-ti | *-tor | *-eti | *-etor |
1st pl. | *-mosi | *-mor | *-omosi | *-omor |
2nd pl. | *-tesi | *-dwe | *-etesi | *-edwe |
3rd pl. | *-nti | *-ntor | *-onti | *-ontor |
Proto-Celtic possessed a diverse set of ways to form present stems. They can be roughly be divided into two broad categories of athematic and thematic.
These two inflectional categories can themselves be subdivided based on the means of derivation from a verb root via a combination of root ablaut grades and suffixes. These derivational classes include: [27] : 36–47
Inflectional class | Root ablaut | Affix | Class | KPV designation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thematic | e-grade | (none) | Simple thematic | A-1 |
*-ye- | e-grade *-ye- | A-5 | ||
*-de- | e-grade *-de- | A-6 | ||
o-grade | *-ī- *-eyo- | *-eye- causative/iterative | (none) | |
zero grade | (none) | Thematized root athematic | A-2 | |
tudáti-type thematic | ||||
*-ske- | *-ske- inchoative | A-3 | ||
*-ye- | zero-grade *-ye- | A-4 | ||
Nasal infix | Aniṭ-root nasal-infix | A-8 | ||
i-reduplication | i-reduplicated present | A-15 | ||
(varied) | *-āye- | Denominative | (none) | |
Athematic | e-grade | (none) | CeRH-root present | A-13 |
zero grade | *-na- (when levelled) | seṭ-root nasal-infix | A-8 | |
*-nu- | *-new- present | A-10 | ||
*-ī- | essive | A-7 | ||
(varied) | *-ā- | factitive | (none) | |
In Proto-Celtic, the Indo-European nasal infix presents split into two categories: ones originally derived from laryngeal-final roots (i.e. seṭ roots in Sanskrit), and ones that were not (i.e. from aniṭ roots). In seṭ verbs, the nasal appears at the end of the present stem, while in aniṭ-derived verbs the nasal was followed by a root-final stop (generally -g- in Old Irish).
Aniṭ nasal infix verbs conjugated exactly like basic thematic verbs in the present tense.
However, the origin of the invariant root vowel in -o- in *CewC- roots in Old Irish is unclear. Usually, it is held that the consonantism in these verbs was generalized in favour of the plural stem *CunC- in Old Irish. One would expect alternation between o in the 1st- and 3rd- person plural and -u- elsewhere in the present; but for both contexts Old Irish only attests -o-.
The following verbs can be reconstructed in this class:
On the other hand, the seṭ presents originally had a long vowel after the nasal in the singular and -a- after the nasal in the plural, but the attested Celtic languages levelled this alternation away. Gaulish shows traces of the singular long-vowel vocalism while Old Irish generalized the plural -a- to the singular. [28]
The seṭ nasal-infix presents were further subdivided into subcategories based on the root-final laryngeal. Traditionally two subclasses have long been accepted, the *h₁ subclass (cited with a -ni- suffix) and *h₂ (cited with a -na- suffix). *h₃ nasal-infixed verbs were often leveled to act like *h₂ verbs, being also cited with a -na- suffix; the only original difference between the two would have been the 3rd-person plural ending in *-nonti instead of *-nanti.
The nasal-infix seṭ verbs in Proto-Celtic underwent multiple levelings. First, the suffixal vowel in the plural forms was harmonized so that they would all be the short counterpart to the vowel in the singular forms. Then all the long vowels in the singular were shortened to make the suffix vowel identical in quality and length across all person-number combinations. [29] : 11–23
Person and number | Pre-leveling | Leveling of vowel quality | Leveling of vowel length | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*h₁ verbs | *h₂ verbs | *h₃ verbs | *h₁ verbs | *h₂ and *h₃ verbs | *h₁ verbs | *h₂ and *h₃ verbs | |
1st sg. | *-nīmi | *-nāmi | *-nāmi | *-nīmi | *-nāmi | *-nimi | *-nami |
2nd sg. | *-nīsi | *-nāsi | *-nāsi | *-nīsi | *-nāsi | *-nisi | *-nasi |
3rd sg. | *-nīti | *-nāti | *-nāti | *-nīti | *-nāti | *-niti | *-nati |
1st pl. | *-namosi | *-namosi | *-namosi | *-nimosi | *-namosi | *-nimosi | *-namosi |
2nd pl. | *-natesi | *-natesi | *-natesi | *-nitesi | *-natesi | *-nitesi | *-natesi |
3rd pl. | *-nenti | *-nanti | *-nonti | *-ninti | *-nanti | *-ninti | *-nanti |
The following seṭ-root nasal presents are reconstructible for Proto-Celtic:
There were two or three major preterite formations in Proto-Celtic, plus another moribund type.
The s-, t-, and root aorist preterites take Indo-European secondary endings, while the reduplicated suffix preterite took stative endings. These endings are: [27] : 62–67
Person and number | Ending type | |
---|---|---|
Secondary endings | Stative endings | |
1st sg. | *-am | *-a |
2nd sg. | *-s | *-as |
3rd sg. | *-t | *-e |
1st pl. | *-mo(s) | *-mo |
2nd pl. | *-te(s) | *-te |
3rd pl. | *-ant | *-ar |
The Old Irish t-preterite was traditionally assumed to be a divergent evolution from the s-preterite, but that derivation was challenged by Jay Jasanoff, who alleges that they were instead imperfects of Narten presents. Either derivation requires Narten ablaut anyway, leading to a stem vowel i in the singular and e in the plural. The stem vowel in the t-preterite was leveled to *e if the next consonant was either velar or *m, and *i in front of *r or *l. [30]
Many suffixless preterite formations featured reduplication. The nature of the reduplication depends on the structure of the root. [27] : 68–79
Root | Meaning | Shape | Preterite stem | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
*keng- | "to step" | Other root types | *ke-kong- | Classic Indo-European reduplication, where the root is put in the o-grade and the prefixed reduplicant is formed with the first consonant followed by *e. |
*nigʷ- | "to wash" | *C(R)eiT- | *ni-noig- | In Proto-Celtic, roots with a semivowel (PIE *-y- or *-w-) before a non-laryngeal consonant have the reduplicant formed not with the first consonant of the root followed by *e, but instead the first consonant of the root followed by the semivowel. The root itself remains in the o-grade. |
*duk- | "to lead, carry" | *C(R)euT- | *du-douk- | |
*gʷed- | "to pray" | *CeT- | *gʷād- | Roots ending in only a single stop as their coda generally merely change the stem vowel to *ā to form their preterite, without apparent reduplication. It originally spread from *ād- (from *h₁e-h₁od-), the preterite stem for *ed- "to eat". |
*kerd- | "to throw, put" | *CeRT- | *kard- | A few roots in *CeRT- also had the *CeT- preterite formation applied to them but the long *ā was shortened due to Osthoff's law. |
*dā- | "to give" | *C(C)eH- | *de-dū (singular) *ded(a)- (plural) | Laryngeal-final roots produced long vowels in the root syllable in the singular, but not in the plural (where the root was in the zero-grade instead). Usually the singular stem was generalized in Celtic, but in these cases the plural stem was generalized. |
*kʷri- | "to buy" | *C(R)eiH- | *kʷi-kʷr- | The treatment for *CeH- roots was also extended to *C(R)eiH- roots. Due to the roots' semivowel, the reduplicant also contains the semivowel. |
One major formation of the future in Celtic, the s-future. It is a descendant of the Proto-Indo-European (h₁)se-desiderative, with i-reduplication in many verbs. The Old Irish a- and s-future come from here. [29]
Another future formation, attested only in Gaulish, is the -sye-desiderative.
Most verbs took one subjunctive suffix in Proto-Celtic, -(a)s-, followed by the thematic primary endings. It was a descendant of the subjunctive of an Indo-European sigmatic thematic formation *-seti . The -ase- variant originated in roots that ended in a laryngeal in Proto-Indo-European; when the *-se- suffix was attached right after a laryngeal, the laryngeal regularly vocalized into *-a-. It would then analogically spread to other Celtic strong verb roots ending in sonorants in addition to the weak verbs, even if the root did not originally end in a laryngeal. [29]
There were also two, possibly three verbs that did not use -(a)se-, instead straight-out taking thematised primary endings. They are: *bwiyeti "to be, exist" (subjunctive *bweti), *klinutor "to hear" (subjunctive *klowetor), and possibly *ɸalnati “to approach, drive” (subjunctive *ɸeleti). [31]
Primary subjunctive formations in Proto-Celtic generally use the e-grade of the verb root, even if the present stem uses the zero-grade.
Imperative endings in Proto-Celtic were as follows: [19] : 147–148 [23]
Person and number | Active endings | |
---|---|---|
Basic endings | With thematic vowels | |
2nd sg. | -∅, *-si | *-e |
3rd sg. | *-tou, *-tūd, *-tu | *-etou, *-etūd, *-etu |
1st pl. | *-mo(s) | *-omo(s) |
2nd pl. | *-te(s) | *-ete(s) |
3rd pl. | *-ntou, *-ntu | *-ontou, *-ontu |
The second-person singular imperative was generally endingless in the active; no ending was generally added to athematic verbs. On thematic -e/o- verbs, the imperative ended in thematic vowel *-e. However, there is also another second-person singular active imperative ending, -si, which was attached to the verb root athematically even with thematic strong verbs. [32]
The thematic deponent second-person singular imperative ending was *-eso. The -the in Old Irish is secondary. [33] [19] : 140
The third-person imperative endings in Insular Celtic, Gaulish and Celtiberian have completely separate origins from each other. The Insular Celtic endings are derived from *-tou, *-ntou, Gaulish endings from *-tu, *-ntu, and the Celtiberian third-person imperative singular ending stems from *-tūd. [23]
Scholarly reconstructions [6] [34] [35] [36] may be summarised in tabular format.[ dubious – discuss ]
Person | Present | Imperfect | Future | Past | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active | Medio- passive | Active | Medio- passive | Active | Medio- passive | Active | Medio- passive | ||
Indicative | 1st sg. | *berū | *berūr | *beremam | — | *bibrāsū | *bibrāsūr | *bīram | — |
2nd sg. | *beresi | *beretar | *beretās | — | *bibrāsesi | *bibrāsetar | *birs | — | |
3rd sg. | *bereti | *beretor | *bereto | — | *bibrāseti | *bibrāsetor | *birt | ? | |
1st pl. | *beromosi | *beromor | *beremo | — | *bibrāsomosi | *bibrāsomor | *berme | — | |
2nd pl. | *beretesi | *beredwe | ? | — | *bibrāsete | *bibrāsedwe | *berte | — | |
3rd pl. | *beronti | *berontor | *berento | — | *bibrāsonti | *bibrāsontor | *berant | ? | |
Subjunctive | 1st sg. | *berasū | *berasūr | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2nd sg. | *berasesi | *berasetar | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
3rd sg. | *beraseti | *berasetor | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
1st pl. | *berasomosi | *berasomor | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2nd pl. | *berasetesi | *berasedwe | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
3rd pl. | *berasonti | *berasontor | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Imperative | 2nd sg. | *bere | *bereso | — | — | — | — | — | — |
3rd sg. | *beretou | ? | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
1st pl. | *beromos | ? | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
2nd pl. | *berete | ? | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
3rd pl. | *berontou | ? | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Participle | *beronts | *beromnos | — | — | — | — | *bertyos | *britos | |
The copula *esti was irregular. It had both athematic and thematic conjugations in the present tense. Schrijver supposes that its athematic present was used clause-initially and the thematic conjugation was used when that was not the case. [37]
Person | Present | |
---|---|---|
Athematic | Thematic | |
1st sg. | *esmi | *esū |
2nd sg. | *esi | *esesi |
3rd sg. | *esti | *eseti |
1st pl. | *esmosi | *esomosi |
2nd pl. | **estes | *esetes |
3rd pl. | *senti | **esonti |
Numeral | PIE | PC |
---|---|---|
1 | *h₁óynos | *oinos |
2 | *dwóh₁ | *duwo |
3 | *tréyes | *trīs |
4 | *kʷetwóres | *kʷetwores |
5 | *pénkʷe | *kʷenkʷe |
6 | *swéḱs | *swexs |
7 | *septḿ̥ | *seɸtam > *sextam |
8 | *oḱtṓw | *oxtū |
9 | *h₁néwn̥ | *nowan |
10 | *déḱm̥ | *dekam |
20 | *wídḱm̥ti | *wikantī |
30 | *tridḱómt | *trīkontes |
100 | *ḱm̥tóm | *kantom |
The vast majority of reliably reconstructible lexical items in Proto-Celtic have good Indo-European etymologies, unlike what is found in, for example, the Greek language—at least 90% according to Matasovic. [38] These include most of the items on the Swadesh list of basic vocabulary. But a few words that do not have Indo-European cognates, so may be borrowings from substrate or adstrate Pre-Indo-European languages, are also from basic vocabulary, including *bodyo- ‘yellow’ (though this has possible cognates in Italic), *kani "good," and *klukka "stone." [39] It is notable that fully 32 items have been reconstructed for Proto-Celtic with the meaning "fight." [40]
(The following examples lack the dual plural and are conjugated in the present tense)
Pronoun | PIE | PC |
---|---|---|
1st Sg. | *bʰéroh₂ | *berū |
2nd Sg. | *bʰéresi | *beresi |
3rd Sg. | *bʰéreti | *bereti |
1st Pl. | *bʰéromos | *beromosi |
2nd Pl. | *bʰérete | *beretesi |
3rd Pl. | *bʰéronti | *beronti |
Pronoun | PIE | PC |
---|---|---|
1st Sg. | *h₁ésmi | *esmi |
2nd Sg. | *h₁ési | *esi |
3rd Sg. | *h₁ésti | *esti |
1st Pl. | *h₁smós | *esmosi |
2nd Pl. | *h₁sté | *estes |
3rd Pl. | *h₁sénti | *senti |
(The following examples lack the dual number)
Case | Singular | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | PIE | PC | |
Nom. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱos | *artos | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoes | *artoi |
Voc. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱe | *arte | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoes | *artūs |
Acc. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱom | *artom | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoms | *artoms |
Gen. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱosyo | *artī | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoHom | *artom |
Dat. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoey | *artūi | *h₂ŕ̥tḱomos | *artobos |
Loc. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱey | *artei | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoysu | ? |
Inst. | *h₂ŕ̥tḱoh₁ | *artū | *h₂ŕ̥tḱōys | *artūis |
Case | Singular | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | PIE | PC | |
Nom. | *ln̥dʰéh₂ | *landā | *ln̥dʰéh₂es | *landās |
Voc. | *ln̥dʰéh₂ | *landā | *ln̥dʰéh₂es | *landās |
Acc. | *ln̥dʰā́m | *landam | *ln̥dʰéh₂m̥s | *landāms |
Gen. | *ln̥dʰéh₂s | *landās | *ln̥dʰéh₂oHom | *landom |
Dat. | *ln̥dʰéh₂ey | *landāi | *ln̥dʰéh₂mos | *landābos |
Loc. | *ln̥dʰéh₂i | *landai | *ln̥dʰéh₂su | ? |
Inst. | *ln̥dʰéh₂h₁ | ? | *ln̥dʰéh₂mis | *landābis |
Case | Singular | Plural | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | PIE | PC | |
Nom. | *yugóm | *yugom | *yugéh₂ | *yugā |
Voc. | *yugóm | *yugom | *yugéh₂ | *yugā |
Acc. | *yugóm | *yugom | *yugéh₂ | *yugā |
Gen. | *yugósyo | *yugī | *yugóHom | *yugom |
Dat. | *yugóey | *yugūi | *yugómos | *yugobos |
Loc. | *yugéy | *yugei | *yugóysu | ? |
Inst. | *yugóh₁ | *yugū | *yugṓys | *yugūis |
(The following example lacks the dual number)
Case | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | PIE | PC | PIE | PC | |
Nom. | *h₂ḱrós | *akros | *h₂ḱréh₂ | *akrā | *h₂ḱróm | *akrom |
Voc. | *h₂ḱré | *akre | *h₂ḱréh₂ | *akrā | *h₂ḱróm | *akrom |
Acc. | *h₂ḱróm | *akrom | *h₂ḱrā́m | *akram | *h₂ḱróm | *akrom |
Gen. | *h₂ḱrósyo | *akrī | *h₂ḱréh₂s | *akrās | *h₂ḱrósyo | *akrī |
Dat. | *h₂ḱróey | *akrūi | *h₂ḱréh₂ey | *akrai | *h₂ḱróey | *akrūi |
Inst. | *h₂ḱróh₁ | *akrū | *h₂ḱréh₂h₁ | ? | *h₂ḱróh₁ | *akrū |
Case | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE | PC | PIE | PC | PIE | PC | |
Nom. | *h₂ḱróes | *akroi | *h₂ḱréh₂es | *akrās | *h₂ḱréh₂ | *akrā |
Voc. | *h₂ḱróes | *akroi | *h₂ḱréh₂es | *akrās | *h₂ḱréh₂ | *akrā |
Acc. | *h₂ḱróms | *akroms | *h₂ḱréh₂m̥s | *akrams | *h₂ḱréh₂ | *akrā |
Gen. | *h₂ḱróHom | *akrom | *h₂ḱréh₂oHom | *akrom | *h₂ḱróHom | *akrom |
Dat. | *h₂ḱrómos | *akrobos | *h₂ḱréh₂mos | *akrābos | *h₂ḱrómos | *akrobis |
Inst. | *h₂ḱrṓys | *akrobis | *h₂ḱréh₂mis | *akrābis | *h₂ḱrṓys | *akrobis |
No. | Pronoun | PIE | PC |
---|---|---|---|
Sg. | 1st | *éǵ > *me [acc.] | *mī |
2nd | *túh₂ | *tū | |
3rd M. | *ís | *se | |
3rd F. | *seh₂ > *sih₂ [*só + *-ih₂] | *sī | |
3rd N. | *íd | *ed | |
Pl. | 1st | *wéy > *nos [acc.] > *nēs | *snīs; *snīsnīs |
2nd | *yū́ > *wos [acc.] > *wēs | *swīs; *swīswīs | |
3rd | *éyes | *eyes |
The Tocharianlanguages, also known as the Arśi-Kuči, Agnean-Kuchean or Kuchean-Agnean languages, are an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family spoken by inhabitants of the Tarim Basin, the Tocharians. The languages are known from manuscripts dating from the 5th to the 8th century AD, which were found in oasis cities on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin and the Lop Desert. The discovery of these languages in the early 20th century contradicted the formerly prevalent idea of an east–west division of the Indo-European language family as centum and satem languages, and prompted reinvigorated study of the Indo-European family. Scholars studying these manuscripts in the early 20th century identified their authors with the Tokharoi, a name used in ancient sources for people of Bactria (Tokharistan). Although this identification is now believed to be mistaken, "Tocharian" remains the usual term for these languages.
In Indo-European studies, a thematic vowel or theme vowel is the vowel *e or *o from ablaut placed before the ending of a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) word. Nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the Indo-European languages with this vowel are thematic, and those without it are athematic. Used more generally, a thematic vowel is any vowel found at the end of the stem of a word.
Proto-Germanic is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages.
Brithenig, or also known as Comroig, is an invented language, or constructed language ("conlang"). It was created as a hobby in 1996 by Andrew Smith from New Zealand, who also invented the alternate history of Ill Bethisad to "explain" it. Officially according to the Ill Bethisad Wiki, Brithenig is classified as a Britanno-Romance language, along with other Romance languages that displaced Celtic.
Insular Celtic languages are the group of Celtic languages spoken in Brittany, Great Britain, Ireland, and the Isle of Man. All surviving Celtic languages are in the Insular group, including Breton, which is spoken on continental Europe in Brittany, France. The Continental Celtic languages, although once widely spoken in mainland Europe and in Anatolia, are extinct.
Celtiberian or Northeastern Hispano-Celtic is an extinct Indo-European language of the Celtic branch spoken by the Celtiberians in an area of the Iberian Peninsula between the headwaters of the Douro, Tagus, Júcar and Turia rivers and the Ebro river. This language is directly attested in nearly 200 inscriptions dated from the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD, mainly in Celtiberian script, a direct adaptation of the northeastern Iberian script, but also in the Latin alphabet. The longest extant Celtiberian inscriptions are those on three Botorrita plaques, bronze plaques from Botorrita near Zaragoza, dating to the early 1st century BC, labeled Botorrita I, III and IV. Shorter and more fragmentary is the Novallas bronze tablet.
Proto-Indo-European verbs reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the substantive, with verbs categorized according to their aspect, using multiple grammatical moods and voices, and being conjugated according to person, number and tense. In addition to finite forms thus formed, non-finite forms such as participles are also extensively used.
Proto-Balto-Slavic is a reconstructed hypothetical proto-language descending from Proto-Indo-European (PIE). From Proto-Balto-Slavic, the later Balto-Slavic languages are thought to have developed, composed of the Baltic and Slavic sub-branches, and including modern Lithuanian, Polish, Russian and Serbo-Croatian, among others.
A feature common to all Indo-European languages is the presence of a verb corresponding to the English verb to be.
In historical linguistics, Italo-Celtic is a hypothetical grouping of the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family on the basis of features shared by these two branches and no others. There is controversy about the causes of these similarities. They are usually considered to be innovations, likely to have developed after the breakup of the Proto-Indo-European language. It is also possible that some of these are not innovations, but shared conservative features, i.e. original Indo-European language features which have disappeared in all other language groups. What is commonly accepted is that the shared features may usefully be thought of as Italo-Celtic forms, as they are certainly shared by the two families and are almost certainly not coincidental. The archaeological horizon with which a hypothetical Italo-Celtic language family is often associated, before the split between Italic and Celtic languages, is that of the Bell Beaker culture.
The Bronze of Luzaga is a plate of 16 x 15 centimeters which has, in 8 lines, 123 Celtiberian characters engraved in the metal with a bradawl or similar, and which has 7 holes, perhaps in order to be held. Since its discovery in the late nineteenth century, it has been lost.
The phonology of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) has been reconstructed by linguists, based on the similarities and differences among current and extinct Indo-European languages. Because PIE was not written, linguists must rely on the evidence of its earliest attested descendants, such as Hittite, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and Latin, to reconstruct its phonology.
The roots of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) are basic parts of words to carry a lexical meaning, so-called morphemes. PIE roots usually have verbal meaning like "to eat" or "to run". Roots never occurred alone in the language. Complete inflected verbs, nouns, and adjectives were formed by adding further morphemes to a root and potentially changing the root's vowel in a process called ablaut.
The morphology of the Welsh language shows many characteristics perhaps unfamiliar to speakers of English or continental European languages like French or German, but has much in common with the other modern Insular Celtic languages: Irish, Scottish Gaelic, Manx, Cornish, and Breton. Welsh is a moderately inflected language. Verbs conjugate for person, tense and mood with affirmative, interrogative and negative conjugations of some verbs. A majority of prepositions inflect for person and number. There are few case inflections in Literary Welsh, being confined to certain pronouns.
Old Norse has three categories of verbs and two categories of nouns. Conjugation and declension are carried out by a mix of inflection and two nonconcatenative morphological processes: umlaut, a backness-based alteration to the root vowel; and ablaut, a replacement of the root vowel, in verbs.
Proto-Tocharian, also spelled Proto-Tokharian, is the reconstructed proto-language of the extinct Tocharian branch of the Indo-European languages.
The Proto-Italic language is the ancestor of the Italic languages, most notably Latin and its descendants, the Romance languages. It is not directly attested in writing, but has been reconstructed to some degree through the comparative method. Proto-Italic descended from the earlier Proto-Indo-European language.
Historical linguistics has made tentative postulations about and multiple varyingly different reconstructions of Proto-Germanic grammar, as inherited from Proto-Indo-European grammar. All reconstructed forms are marked with an asterisk (*).
This article describes the grammar of the Old Irish language. The grammar of the language has been described with exhaustive detail by various authors, including Thurneysen, Binchy and Bergin, McCone, O'Connell, Stifter, among many others.
Old Irish was affected by a series of phonological changes that radically altered its appearance compared with Proto-Celtic and older Celtic languages. The changes occurred at a fairly rapid pace between 350 and 550 CE.
Notes
Bibliography