Biological pest control

Last updated

Syrphus hoverfly larva (below) feed on aphids (above), making them natural biological control agents. Syrphid.maggot3554.5.13.08cw.jpg
Syrphus hoverfly larva (below) feed on aphids (above), making them natural biological control agents.
A parasitoid wasp (Cotesia congregata) adult with pupal cocoons on its host, a tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta, green background), an example of a hymenopteran biological control agent Cotesia9061.8.15.07.c.jpg
A parasitoid wasp ( Cotesia congregata ) adult with pupal cocoons on its host, a tobacco hornworm ( Manduca sexta , green background), an example of a hymenopteran biological control agent

Biological control or biocontrol is a method of controlling pests, whether pest animals such as insects and mites, weeds, or pathogens affecting animals or plants by using other organisms. [1] It relies on predation, parasitism, herbivory, or other natural mechanisms, but typically also involves an active human management role. It can be an important component of integrated pest management (IPM) programs.

Contents

There are three basic strategies for biological control: classical (importation), where a natural enemy of a pest is introduced in the hope of achieving control; inductive (augmentation), in which a large population of natural enemies are administered for quick pest control; and inoculative (conservation), in which measures are taken to maintain natural enemies through regular reestablishment. [2]

Natural enemies of insects play an important part in limiting the densities of potential pests. Biological control agents such as these include predators, parasitoids, pathogens, and competitors. Biological control agents of plant diseases are most often referred to as antagonists. Biological control agents of weeds include seed predators, herbivores, and plant pathogens.

Biological control can have side-effects on biodiversity through attacks on non-target species by any of the above mechanisms, especially when a species is introduced without a thorough understanding of the possible consequences.

History

The term "biological control" was first used by Harry Scott Smith at the 1919 meeting of the Pacific Slope Branch of the American Association of Economic Entomologists, in Riverside, California. [3] It was brought into more widespread use by the entomologist Paul H. DeBach (1914–1993) who worked on citrus crop pests throughout his life. [4] [5] However, the practice has previously been used for centuries. The first report of the use of an insect species to control an insect pest comes from "Nanfang Caomu Zhuang" (南方草木狀 Plants of the Southern Regions) (c. 304 AD), attributed to Western Jin dynasty botanist Ji Han (嵇含, 263–307), in which it is mentioned that " Jiaozhi people sell ants and their nests attached to twigs looking like thin cotton envelopes, the reddish-yellow ant being larger than normal. Without such ants, southern citrus fruits will be severely insect-damaged". [6] The ants used are known as huang gan (huang = yellow, gan = citrus) ants ( Oecophylla smaragdina ). The practice was later reported by Ling Biao Lu Yi (late Tang dynasty or Early Five Dynasties), in Ji Le Pian by Zhuang Jisu (Southern Song dynasty), in the Book of Tree Planting by Yu Zhen Mu (Ming dynasty), in the book Guangdong Xing Yu (17th century), Lingnan by Wu Zhen Fang (Qing dynasty), in Nanyue Miscellanies by Li Diao Yuan, and others. [6]

Biological control techniques as we know them today started to emerge in the 1870s. During this decade, in the US, the Missouri State Entomologist C. V. Riley and the Illinois State Entomologist W. LeBaron began within-state redistribution of parasitoids to control crop pests. The first international shipment of an insect as a biological control agent was made by Charles V. Riley in 1873, shipping to France the predatory mites Tyroglyphus phylloxera to help fight the grapevine phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) that was destroying grapevines in France. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) initiated research in classical biological control following the establishment of the Division of Entomology in 1881, with C. V. Riley as Chief. The first importation of a parasitoidal wasp into the United States was that of the braconid Cotesia glomerata in 1883–1884, imported from Europe to control the invasive cabbage white butterfly, Pieris rapae . In 1888–1889 the vedalia beetle, Novius cardinalis , a lady beetle, was introduced from Australia to California to control the cottony cushion scale, Icerya purchasi . This had become a major problem for the newly developed citrus industry in California, but by the end of 1889, the cottony cushion scale population had already declined. This great success led to further introductions of beneficial insects into the US. [7] [8]

In 1905 the USDA initiated its first large-scale biological control program, sending entomologists to Europe and Japan to look for natural enemies of the spongy moth, Lymantria dispar dispar , and the brown-tail moth, Euproctis chrysorrhoea, invasive pests of trees and shrubs. As a result, nine parasitoids (solitary wasps) of the spongy moth, seven of the brown-tail moth, and two predators of both moths became established in the US. Although the spongy moth was not fully controlled by these natural enemies, the frequency, duration, and severity of its outbreaks were reduced and the program was regarded as successful. This program also led to the development of many concepts, principles, and procedures for the implementation of biological control programs. [7] [8] [9]

Cactoblastis cactorum larvae feeding on Opuntia prickly pear cacti Larvaefeedingoncacti.jpg
Cactoblastis cactorum larvae feeding on Opuntia prickly pear cacti

Prickly pear cacti were introduced into Queensland, Australia as ornamental plants, starting in 1788. They quickly spread to cover over 25 million hectares of Australia by 1920, increasing by 1 million hectares per year. Digging, burning, and crushing all proved ineffective. Two control agents were introduced to help control the spread of the plant, the cactus moth Cactoblastis cactorum , and the scale insect Dactylopius . Between 1926 and 1931, tens of millions of cactus moth eggs were distributed around Queensland with great success, and by 1932, most areas of prickly pear had been destroyed. [10]

The first reported case of a classical biological control attempt in Canada involves the parasitoidal wasp Trichogramma minutum . Individuals were caught in New York State and released in Ontario gardens in 1882 by William Saunders, a trained chemist and first Director of the Dominion Experimental Farms, for controlling the invasive currantworm Nematus ribesii . Between 1884 and 1908, the first Dominion Entomologist, James Fletcher, continued introductions of other parasitoids and pathogens for the control of pests in Canada. [11]

Types of biological pest control

There are three basic biological pest control strategies: importation (classical biological control), augmentation and conservation. [12]

Importation

Rodolia cardinalis, the vedalia beetle, was imported from Australia to California in the 19th century, successfully controlling cottony cushion scale on orange trees. Vedalia Beetle (15959056801).jpg
Rodolia cardinalis , the vedalia beetle, was imported from Australia to California in the 19th century, successfully controlling cottony cushion scale on orange trees.

Importation or classical biological control involves the introduction of a pest's natural enemies to a new locale where they do not occur naturally. Early instances were often unofficial and not based on research, and some introduced species became serious pests themselves. [13]

To be most effective at controlling a pest, a biological control agent requires a colonizing ability which allows it to keep pace with changes to the habitat in space and time. Control is greatest if the agent has temporal persistence so that it can maintain its population even in the temporary absence of the target species, and if it is an opportunistic forager, enabling it to rapidly exploit a pest population. [14]

One of the earliest successes was in controlling Icerya purchasi (cottony cushion scale) in Australia, using a predatory insect Rodolia cardinalis (the vedalia beetle). This success was repeated in California using the beetle and a parasitoidal fly, Cryptochaetum iceryae . [15] Other successful cases include the control of Antonina graminis in Texas by Neodusmetia sangwani in the 1960s. [16]

Damage from Hypera postica , the alfalfa weevil, a serious introduced pest of forage, was substantially reduced by the introduction of natural enemies. 20 years after their introduction the population of weevils in the alfalfa area treated for alfalfa weevil in the Northeastern United States remained 75 percent down. [17]

The invasive species Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) was controlled in Florida (U.S.) by introducing alligator weed flea beetle. Alternanthera philoxeroides NRCS-1.jpg
The invasive species Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) was controlled in Florida (U.S.) by introducing alligator weed flea beetle.

Alligator weed was introduced to the United States from South America. It takes root in shallow water, interfering with navigation, irrigation, and flood control. The alligator weed flea beetle and two other biological controls were released in Florida, greatly reducing the amount of land covered by the plant. [18] Another aquatic weed, the giant salvinia ( Salvinia molesta ) is a serious pest, covering waterways, reducing water flow and harming native species. Control with the salvinia weevil ( Cyrtobagous salviniae ) and the salvinia stem-borer moth ( Samea multiplicalis) is effective in warm climates, [19] [20] and in Zimbabwe, a 99% control of the weed was obtained over a two-year period. [21]

Small, commercially-reared parasitoidal wasps, [12] Trichogramma ostriniae , provide limited and erratic control of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis), a serious pest. Careful formulations of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis are more effective. The O. nubilalis integrated control releasing Tricogramma brassicae (egg parasitoid) and later Bacillus thuringiensis subs. kurstaki (larvicide effect) reduce pest damages more than insecticide treatments [22]

The population of Levuana iridescens , the Levuana moth, a serious coconut pest in Fiji, was brought under control by a classical biological control program in the 1920s. [23]

Augmentation

Hippodamia convergens, the convergent lady beetle, is commonly sold for biological control of aphids. Lady bugs are a beneficial insect commonly sold for biological control of aphids..jpg
Hippodamia convergens , the convergent lady beetle, is commonly sold for biological control of aphids.

Augmentation involves the supplemental release of natural enemies that occur in a particular area, boosting the naturally occurring populations there. In inoculative release, small numbers of the control agents are released at intervals to allow them to reproduce, in the hope of setting up longer-term control and thus keeping the pest down to a low level, constituting prevention rather than cure. In inundative release, in contrast, large numbers are released in the hope of rapidly reducing a damaging pest population, correcting a problem that has already arisen. Augmentation can be effective, but is not guaranteed to work, and depends on the precise details of the interactions between each pest and control agent. [24]

An example of inoculative release occurs in the horticultural production of several crops in greenhouses. Periodic releases of the parasitoidal wasp, Encarsia formosa , are used to control greenhouse whitefly, [25] while the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis is used for control of the two-spotted spider mite. [26]

The egg parasite Trichogramma is frequently released inundatively to control harmful moths. New way for inundative releases are now introduced i.e. use of drones. Egg parasitoids are able to find the eggs of the target host by means of several cues. Kairomones were found on moth scales. Similarly, Bacillus thuringiensis and other microbial insecticides are used in large enough quantities for a rapid effect. [24] Recommended release rates for Trichogramma in vegetable or field crops range from 5,000 to 200,000 per acre (1 to 50 per square metre) per week according to the level of pest infestation. [27] Similarly, nematodes that kill insects (that are entomopathogenic) are released at rates of millions and even billions per acre for control of certain soil-dwelling insect pests. [28]

Conservation

The conservation of existing natural enemies in an environment is the third method of biological pest control. [29] Natural enemies are already adapted to the habitat and to the target pest, and their conservation can be simple and cost-effective, as when nectar-producing crop plants are grown in the borders of rice fields. These provide nectar to support parasitoids and predators of planthopper pests and have been demonstrated to be so effective (reducing pest densities by 10- or even 100-fold) that farmers sprayed 70% less insecticides and enjoyed yields boosted by 5%. [30] Predators of aphids were similarly found to be present in tussock grasses by field boundary hedges in England, but they spread too slowly to reach the centers of fields. Control was improved by planting a meter-wide strip of tussock grasses in field centers, enabling aphid predators to overwinter there. [29]

An inverted flowerpot filled with straw to attract earwigs Dermaptera flowerpot.jpg
An inverted flowerpot filled with straw to attract earwigs

Cropping systems can be modified to favor natural enemies, a practice sometimes referred to as habitat manipulation. Providing a suitable habitat, such as a shelterbelt, hedgerow, or beetle bank where beneficial insects such as parasitoidal wasps can live and reproduce, can help ensure the survival of populations of natural enemies. Things as simple as leaving a layer of fallen leaves or mulch in place provides a suitable food source for worms and provides a shelter for insects, in turn being a food source for such beneficial mammals as hedgehogs and shrews. Compost piles and stacks of wood can provide shelter for invertebrates and small mammals. Long grass and ponds support amphibians. Not removing dead annuals and non-hardy plants in the autumn allow insects to make use of their hollow stems during winter. [31] In California, prune trees are sometimes planted in grape vineyards to provide an improved overwintering habitat or refuge for a key grape pest parasitoid. [32] The providing of artificial shelters in the form of wooden caskets, boxes or flowerpots is also sometimes undertaken, particularly in gardens, to make a cropped area more attractive to natural enemies. For example, earwigs are natural predators that can be encouraged in gardens by hanging upside-down flowerpots filled with straw or wood wool. Green lacewings can be encouraged by using plastic bottles with an open bottom and a roll of cardboard inside. Birdhouses enable insectivorous birds to nest; the most useful birds can be attracted by choosing an opening just large enough for the desired species. [31]

In cotton production, the replacement of broad-spectrum insecticides with selective control measures such as Bt cotton can create a more favorable environment for natural enemies of cotton pests due to reduced insecticide exposure risk. Such predators or parasitoids can control pests not affected by the Bt protein. Reduced prey quality and abundance associated with increased control from Bt cotton can also indirectly decrease natural enemy populations in some cases, but the percentage of pests eaten or parasitized in Bt and non-Bt cotton are often similar. [33]

Biological control agents

Predators

Predatory lacewings are available from biocontrol dealers. Chrysopidae 3035.jpg
Predatory lacewings are available from biocontrol dealers.

Predators are mainly free-living species that directly consume a large number of prey during their whole lifetime. Given that many major crop pests are insects, many of the predators used in biological control are insectivorous species. Lady beetles, and in particular their larvae which are active between May and July in the northern hemisphere, are voracious predators of aphids, and also consume mites, scale insects and small caterpillars. The spotted lady beetle ( Coleomegilla maculata ) is also able to feed on the eggs and larvae of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). [34]

The larvae of many hoverfly species principally feed upon aphids, one larva devouring up to 400 in its lifetime. Their effectiveness in commercial crops has not been studied. [35]

The running crab spider Philodromus cespitum also prey heavily on aphids, and act as a biological control agent in European fruit orchards. [36]

Predatory Polistes wasp searching for bollworms or other caterpillars on a cotton plant Organic-agriculture biocontrol-cotton polistes-wasp3.png
Predatory Polistes wasp searching for bollworms or other caterpillars on a cotton plant

Several species of entomopathogenic nematode are important predators of insect and other invertebrate pests. [37] [38] Entomopathogenic nematodes form a stress–resistant stage known as the infective juvenile. These spread in the soil and infect suitable insect hosts. Upon entering the insect they move to the hemolymph where they recover from their stagnated state of development and release their bacterial symbionts. The bacterial symbionts reproduce and release toxins, which then kill the host insect. [38] [39] Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita is a microscopic nematode that kills slugs. Its complex life cycle includes a free-living, infective stage in the soil where it becomes associated with a pathogenic bacteria such as Moraxella osloensis . The nematode enters the slug through the posterior mantle region, thereafter feeding and reproducing inside, but it is the bacteria that kill the slug. The nematode is available commercially in Europe and is applied by watering onto moist soil. [40] Entomopathogenic nematodes have a limited shelf life because of their limited resistance to high temperature and dry conditions. [39] The type of soil they are applied to may also limit their effectiveness. [38]

Species used to control spider mites include the predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis , [41] Neoseilus californicus, [42] and Amblyseius cucumeris , the predatory midge Feltiella acarisuga , [42] and a ladybird Stethorus punctillum . [42] The bug Orius insidiosus has been successfully used against the two-spotted spider mite and the western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). [43]

Predators including Cactoblastis cactorum (mentioned above) can also be used to destroy invasive plant species. As another example, the poison hemlock moth (Agonopterix alstroemeriana) can be used to control poison hemlock (Conium maculatum). During its larval stage, the moth strictly consumes its host plant, poison hemlock, and can exist at hundreds of larvae per individual host plant, destroying large swathes of the hemlock. [44]

The parasitoid wasp Aleiodes indiscretus parasitizing a spongy moth caterpillar, a serious pest of forestry Aleiodes indiscretus wasp parasitizing gypsy moth caterpillar.jpg
The parasitoid wasp Aleiodes indiscretus parasitizing a spongy moth caterpillar, a serious pest of forestry

For rodent pests, cats are effective biological control when used in conjunction with reduction of "harborage"/hiding locations. [46] [47] [48] While cats are effective at preventing rodent "population explosions", they are not effective for eliminating pre-existing severe infestations. [48] Barn owls are also sometimes used as biological rodent control. [49] Although there are no quantitative studies of the effectiveness of barn owls for this purpose, [50] they are known rodent predators that can be used in addition to or instead of cats; [51] [52] they can be encouraged into an area with nest boxes. [53] [54]

In Honduras, where the mosquito Aedes aegypti was transmitting dengue fever and other infectious diseases, biological control was attempted by a community action plan; copepods, baby turtles, and juvenile tilapia were added to the wells and tanks where the mosquito breeds and the mosquito larvae were eliminated. [55]

Even amongst arthropods usually thought of as obligate predators of animals (especially other arthropods), floral food sources (nectar and to a lesser degree pollen) are often useful adjunct sources. [56] It had been noticed in one study [57] that adult Adalia bipunctata (predator and common biocontrol of Ephestia kuehniella ) could survive on flowers but never completed its life cycle, so a meta-analysis [56] was done to find such an overall trend in previously published data, if it existed. In some cases floral resources are outright necessary. [56] Overall, floral resources (and an imitation, i.e. sugar water) increase longevity and fecundity, meaning even predatory population numbers can depend on non-prey food abundance. [56] Thus biocontrol population maintenance – and success – may depend on nearby flowers. [56]

Parasitoids

Parasitoids lay their eggs on or in the body of an insect host, which is then used as a food for developing larvae. The host is ultimately killed. Most insect parasitoids are wasps or flies, and many have a very narrow host range. The most important groups are the ichneumonid wasps, which mainly use caterpillars as hosts; braconid wasps, which attack caterpillars and a wide range of other insects including aphids; chalcidoid wasps, which parasitize eggs and larvae of many insect species; and tachinid flies, which parasitize a wide range of insects including caterpillars, beetle adults and larvae, and true bugs. [58] Parasitoids are most effective at reducing pest populations when their host organisms have limited refuges to hide from them. [59]

Encarsia formosa, widely used in greenhouse horticulture, was one of the first biological control agents developed. Encarsia formosa, an endoparasitic wasp, is used for whitefly control.jpg
Encarsia formosa , widely used in greenhouse horticulture, was one of the first biological control agents developed.
Life cycles of greenhouse whitefly and its parasitoid wasp Encarsia formosa Waspcycle.png
Life cycles of greenhouse whitefly and its parasitoid wasp Encarsia formosa

Parasitoids are among the most widely used biological control agents. Commercially, there are two types of rearing systems: short-term daily output with high production of parasitoids per day, and long-term, low daily output systems. [60] In most instances, production will need to be matched with the appropriate release dates when susceptible host species at a suitable phase of development will be available. [61] Larger production facilities produce on a yearlong basis, whereas some facilities produce only seasonally. Rearing facilities are usually a significant distance from where the agents are to be used in the field, and transporting the parasitoids from the point of production to the point of use can pose problems. [62] Shipping conditions can be too hot, and even vibrations from planes or trucks can adversely affect parasitoids. [60]

Encarsia formosa is a small parasitoid wasp attacking whiteflies, sap-feeding insects which can cause wilting and black sooty moulds in glasshouse vegetable and ornamental crops. It is most effective when dealing with low level infestations, giving protection over a long period of time. The wasp lays its eggs in young whitefly 'scales', turning them black as the parasite larvae pupate. [25] Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) has been introduced to control the glassy-winged sharpshooter Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in French Polynesia and has successfully controlled ~95% of the pest density. [63]

The eastern spruce budworm is an example of a destructive insect in fir and spruce forests. Birds are a natural form of biological control, but the Trichogramma minutum, a species of parasitic wasp, has been investigated as an alternative to more controversial chemical controls. [64]

There are a number of recent studies pursuing sustainable methods for controlling urban cockroaches using parasitic wasps. [65] [66] Since most cockroaches remain in the sewer system and sheltered areas which are inaccessible to insecticides, employing active-hunter wasps is a strategy to try and reduce their populations.

Pathogens

Pathogenic micro-organisms include bacteria, fungi, and viruses. They kill or debilitate their host and are relatively host-specific. Various microbial insect diseases occur naturally, but may also be used as biological pesticides. [67] When naturally occurring, these outbreaks are density-dependent in that they generally only occur as insect populations become denser. [68]

The use of pathogens against aquatic weeds was unknown until a groundbreaking 1972 proposal by Zettler and Freeman. Up to that point biocontrol of any kind had not been used against any water weeds. In their review of the possibilities, they noted the lack of interest and information thus far, and listed what was known of pests-of-pests – whether pathogens or not. They proposed that this should be relatively straightfoward to apply in the same way as other biocontrols. [69] And indeed in the decades since, the same biocontrol methods that are routine on land have become common in the water.

Bacteria

Bacteria used for biological control infect insects via their digestive tracts, so they offer only limited options for controlling insects with sucking mouth parts such as aphids and scale insects. [70] Bacillus thuringiensis , a soil-dwelling bacterium, is the most widely applied species of bacteria used for biological control, with at least four sub-species used against Lepidopteran (moth, butterfly), Coleopteran (beetle) and Dipteran (true fly) insect pests. The bacterium is available to organic farmers in sachets of dried spores which are mixed with water and sprayed onto vulnerable plants such as brassicas and fruit trees. [71] [72] Genes from B. thuringiensis have also been incorporated into transgenic crops, making the plants express some of the bacterium's toxins, which are proteins. These confer resistance to insect pests and thus reduce the necessity for pesticide use. [73] If pests develop resistance to the toxins in these crops, B. thuringiensis will become useless in organic farming also. [74] [72] The bacterium Paenibacillus popilliae which causes milky spore disease has been found useful in the control of Japanese beetle, killing the larvae. It is very specific to its host species and is harmless to vertebrates and other invertebrates. [75]

Bacillus spp., [M 1] fluorescent Pseudomonads, [M 1] and Streptomycetes are controls of various fungal pathogens. [M 2]

Colombia mosquito control

The largest-ever deployment of Wolbachia -infected A. aegypti mosquitoes reduced dengue incidence by 94–97% in the Colombian cities of Bello, Medellín, and Itagüí. The project was executed by non-profit World Mosquito Program (WMP). Wolbachia prevents mosquitos from transmitting viruses such as dengue and zika. The insects pass the bacteria on to their offspring. The project covered a combined area of 135 square kilometres (52 sq mi), home to 3.3 million people. Most of the project area reached the target of infecting 60% of local mosquitoes. The technique is not endorsed by WHO. [76]

Fungi

Green peach aphid, a pest in its own right and a vector of plant viruses, killed by the fungus Pandora neoaphidis (Zygomycota: Entomophthorales) Scale bar = 0.3 mm. Pandora neoaphidis.jpg
Green peach aphid, a pest in its own right and a vector of plant viruses, killed by the fungus Pandora neoaphidis (Zygomycota: Entomophthorales) Scale bar = 0.3 mm.

Entomopathogenic fungi, which cause disease in insects, include at least 14 species that attack aphids. [77] Beauveria bassiana is mass-produced and used to manage a wide variety of insect pests including whiteflies, thrips, aphids and weevils. [78] Lecanicillium spp. are deployed against white flies, thrips and aphids. Metarhizium spp. are used against pests including beetles, locusts and other grasshoppers, Hemiptera, and spider mites. Paecilomyces fumosoroseus is effective against white flies, thrips and aphids; Purpureocillium lilacinus is used against root-knot nematodes, and 89 Trichoderma species against certain plant pathogens. [M 3] Trichoderma viride has been used against Dutch elm disease, and has shown some effect in suppressing silver leaf, a disease of stone fruits caused by the pathogenic fungus Chondrostereum purpureum . [79]

Pathogenic fungi may be controlled by other fungi, or bacteria or yeasts, such as: Gliocladium spp., mycoparasitic Pythium spp., binucleate types of Rhizoctonia spp., and Laetisaria spp.

The fungi Cordyceps and Metacordyceps are deployed against a wide spectrum of arthropods. [80] Entomophaga is effective against pests such as the green peach aphid. [81]

Several members of Chytridiomycota and Blastocladiomycota have been explored as agents of biological control. [82] [83] From Chytridiomycota, Synchytrium solstitiale is being considered as a control agent of the yellow star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in the United States. [84]

Viruses

Baculoviruses are specific to individual insect host species and have been shown to be useful in biological pest control. For example, the Lymantria dispar multicapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus has been used to spray large areas of forest in North America where larvae of the spongy moth are causing serious defoliation. The moth larvae are killed by the virus they have eaten and die, the disintegrating cadavers leaving virus particles on the foliage to infect other larvae. [85]

A mammalian virus, the rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus was introduced to Australia to attempt to control the European rabbit populations there. [86] It escaped from quarantine and spread across the country, killing large numbers of rabbits. Very young animals survived, passing immunity to their offspring in due course and eventually producing a virus-resistant population. [87] Introduction into New Zealand in the 1990s was similarly successful at first, but a decade later, immunity had developed and populations had returned to pre-RHD levels. [88]

RNA mycoviruses are controls of various fungal pathogens. [M 2]

Oomycota

Lagenidium giganteum is a water-borne mold that parasitizes the larval stage of mosquitoes. When applied to water, the motile spores avoid unsuitable host species and search out suitable mosquito larval hosts. This mold has the advantages of a dormant phase, resistant to desiccation, with slow-release characteristics over several years. Unfortunately, it is susceptible to many chemicals used in mosquito abatement programmes. [89]

Competitors

The legume vine Mucuna pruriens is used in the countries of Benin and Vietnam as a biological control for problematic Imperata cylindrica grass: the vine is extremely vigorous and suppresses neighbouring plants by out-competing them for space and light. Mucuna pruriens is said not to be invasive outside its cultivated area. [90] Desmodium uncinatum can be used in push-pull farming to stop the parasitic plant, witchweed ( Striga ). [91]

The Australian bush fly, Musca vetustissima , is a major nuisance pest in Australia, but native decomposers found in Australia are not adapted to feeding on cow dung, which is where bush flies breed. Therefore, the Australian Dung Beetle Project (1965–1985), led by George Bornemissza of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, released forty-nine species of dung beetle, to reduce the amount of dung and therefore also the potential breeding sites of the fly. [92]

Combined use of parasitoids and pathogens

In cases of massive and severe infection of invasive pests, techniques of pest control are often used in combination. An example is the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis , an invasive beetle from China, which has destroyed tens of millions of ash trees in its introduced range in North America. As part of the campaign against it, from 2003 American scientists and the Chinese Academy of Forestry searched for its natural enemies in the wild, leading to the discovery of several parasitoid wasps, namely Tetrastichus planipennisi, a gregarious larval endoparasitoid, Oobius agrili , a solitary, parthenogenic egg parasitoid, and Spathius agrili , a gregarious larval ectoparasitoid. These have been introduced and released into the United States of America as a possible biological control of the emerald ash borer. Initial results for Tetrastichus planipennisi have shown promise, and it is now being released along with Beauveria bassiana , a fungal pathogen with known insecticidal properties. [93] [94] [95]

Secondary plants

In addition, biological pest control sometimes makes use of plant defenses to reduce crop damage by herbivores. Techniques include polyculture, the planting together of two or more species such as a primary crop and a secondary plant, which may also be a crop. This can allow the secondary plant's defensive chemicals to protect the crop planted with it. [96]

Target pests

Fungal pests

Botrytis cinerea on lettuce, by Fusarium spp. and Penicillium claviforme , on grape and strawberry by Trichoderma spp., on strawberry by Cladosporium herbarum , on Chinese cabbage by Bacillus brevis , and on various other crops by various yeasts and bacteria. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by several fungal biocontrols. Fungal pod infection of snap bean by Trichoderma hamatum if before or concurrent with infection. [M 4] Cryphonectria parasitica , Gaeumannomyces graminis , Sclerotinia spp., and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi by viruses. [M 2] Various powdery mildews and rusts by various Bacillus spp. and fluorescent Pseudomonads. [M 1] Colletotrichum orbiculare will suppress further infection by itself if manipulated to produce plant-induced systemic resistance by infected the lowest leaf. [M 5]

Difficulties

Many of the most important pests are exotic, invasive species that severely impact agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and urban environments. They tend to arrive without their co-evolved parasites, pathogens and predators, and by escaping from these, populations may soar. Importing the natural enemies of these pests may seem a logical move but this may have unintended consequences; regulations may be ineffective and there may be unanticipated effects on biodiversity, and the adoption of the techniques may prove challenging because of a lack of knowledge among farmers and growers. [97]

Side effects

Biological control can affect biodiversity [14] through predation, parasitism, pathogenicity, competition, or other attacks on non-target species. [98] An introduced control does not always target only the intended pest species; it can also target native species. [99] In Hawaii during the 1940s parasitic wasps were introduced to control a lepidopteran pest and the wasps are still found there today. This may have a negative impact on the native ecosystem; however, host range and impacts need to be studied before declaring their impact on the environment. [100]

Cane toad (introduced into Australia 1935) spread from 1940 to 1980: it was ineffective as a control agent. Its distribution has continued to widen since 1980. Cane toad distribution stills.png
Cane toad (introduced into Australia 1935) spread from 1940 to 1980: it was ineffective as a control agent. Its distribution has continued to widen since 1980.

Vertebrate animals tend to be generalist feeders, and seldom make good biological control agents; many of the classic cases of "biocontrol gone awry" involve vertebrates. For example, the cane toad (Rhinella marina) was intentionally introduced to Australia to control the greyback cane beetle (Dermolepida albohirtum), [101] and other pests of sugar cane. 102 toads were obtained from Hawaii and bred in captivity to increase their numbers until they were released into the sugar cane fields of the tropic north in 1935. It was later discovered that the toads could not jump very high and so were unable to eat the cane beetles which stayed on the upper stalks of the cane plants. However, the toad thrived by feeding on other insects and soon spread very rapidly; it took over native amphibian habitat and brought foreign disease to native toads and frogs, dramatically reducing their populations. Also, when it is threatened or handled, the cane toad releases poison from parotoid glands on its shoulders; native Australian species such as goannas, tiger snakes, dingos and northern quolls that attempted to eat the toad were harmed or killed. However, there has been some recent evidence that native predators are adapting, both physiologically and through changing their behaviour, so in the long run, their populations may recover. [102]

Rhinocyllus conicus , a seed-feeding weevil, was introduced to North America to control exotic musk thistle (Carduus nutans) and Canadian thistle (Cirsium arvense). However, the weevil also attacks native thistles, harming such species as the endemic Platte thistle (Cirsium neomexicanum) by selecting larger plants (which reduced the gene pool), reducing seed production and ultimately threatening the species' survival. [103] Similarly, the weevil Larinus planus was also used to try to control the Canadian thistle, but it damaged other thistles as well. [104] [105] This included one species classified as threatened. [106]

The small Asian mongoose (Herpestus javanicus) was introduced to Hawaii in order to control the rat population. However, the mongoose was diurnal, and the rats emerged at night; the mongoose, therefore, preyed on the endemic birds of Hawaii, especially their eggs, more often than it ate the rats, and now both rats and mongooses threaten the birds. This introduction was undertaken without understanding the consequences of such an action. No regulations existed at the time, and more careful evaluation should prevent such releases now. [107]

The sturdy and prolific eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) is a native of the southeastern United States and was introduced around the world in the 1930s and '40s to feed on mosquito larvae and thus combat malaria. However, it has thrived at the expense of local species, causing a decline of endemic fish and frogs through competition for food resources, as well as through eating their eggs and larvae. [108] In Australia, control of the mosquitofish is the subject of discussion; in 1989 researchers A. H. Arthington and L. L. Lloyd stated that "biological population control is well beyond present capabilities". [109]

Grower education

A potential obstacle to the adoption of biological pest control measures is that growers may prefer to stay with the familiar use of pesticides. However, pesticides have undesired effects, including the development of resistance among pests, and the destruction of natural enemies; these may in turn enable outbreaks of pests of other species than the ones originally targeted, and on crops at a distance from those treated with pesticides. [110] One method of increasing grower adoption of biocontrol methods involves letting them learn by doing, for example showing them simple field experiments, enabling them to observe the live predation of pests, or demonstrations of parasitised pests. In the Philippines, early-season sprays against leaf folder caterpillars were common practice, but growers were asked to follow a 'rule of thumb' of not spraying against leaf folders for the first 30 days after transplanting; participation in this resulted in a reduction of insecticide use by 1/3 and a change in grower perception of insecticide use. [111]

Related to biological pest control is the technique of introducing sterile individuals into the native population of some organism. This technique is widely practised with insects: a large number of males sterilized by radiation are released into the environment, which proceed to compete with the native males for females. Those females that copulate with the sterile males will lay infertile eggs, resulting in a decrease in the size of the population. Over time, with repeated introductions of sterile males, this could result in a significant decrease in the size of the organism's population. [112] A similar technique has recently been applied to weeds using irradiated pollen, [113] resulting in deformed seeds that do not sprout. [114]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Companion planting</span> Agricultural technique

Companion planting in gardening and agriculture is the planting of different crops in proximity for any of a number of different reasons, including weed suppression, pest control, pollination, providing habitat for beneficial insects, maximizing use of space, and to otherwise increase crop productivity. Companion planting is a form of polyculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aphid</span> Superfamily of insects

Aphids are small sap-sucking insects and members of the superfamily Aphidoidea. Common names include greenfly and blackfly, although individuals within a species can vary widely in color. The group includes the fluffy white woolly aphids. A typical life cycle involves flightless females giving live birth to female nymphs—who may also be already pregnant, an adaptation scientists call telescoping generations—without the involvement of males. Maturing rapidly, females breed profusely so that the number of these insects multiplies quickly. Winged females may develop later in the season, allowing the insects to colonize new plants. In temperate regions, a phase of sexual reproduction occurs in the autumn, with the insects often overwintering as eggs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pest (organism)</span> Organism harmful to humans/our concerns

A pest is any organism harmful to humans or human concerns. The term is particularly used for creatures that damage crops, livestock, and forestry or cause a nuisance to people, especially in their homes. Humans have modified the environment for their own purposes and are intolerant of other creatures occupying the same space when their activities impact adversely on human objectives. Thus, an elephant is unobjectionable in its natural habitat but a pest when it tramples crops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasitoid</span> Organism that lives with its host and kills it

In evolutionary ecology, a parasitoid is an organism that lives in close association with its host at the host's expense, eventually resulting in the death of the host. Parasitoidism is one of six major evolutionary strategies within parasitism, distinguished by the fatal prognosis for the host, which makes the strategy close to predation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated pest management</span> Approach for economic control of pests

Integrated pest management (IPM), also known as integrated pest control (IPC) that integrates both chemical and non-chemical practices for economic control of pests. The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization defines IPM as "the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimize risks to human health and the environment. IPM emphasizes the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems and encourages natural pest control mechanisms." Entomologists and ecologists have urged the adoption of IPM pest control since the 1970s. IPM is a safer pest control framework than reliance on the use of chemical pesticides, mitigating risks such as: insecticide-induced resurgence, pesticide resistance and (especially food) crop residues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beneficial insect</span>

Beneficial insects are any of a number of species of insects that perform valued services like pollination and pest control. The concept of beneficial is subjective and only arises in light of desired outcomes from a human perspective. In agriculture, where the goal is to raise selected crops, insects that hinder the production process are classified as pests, while insects that assist production are considered beneficial. In horticulture and gardening, beneficial insects are often considered those that contribute to pest control and native habitat integration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Silverleaf whitefly</span> Species of true bug

The silverleaf whitefly is one of several species of whitefly that are currently important agricultural pests. A review in 2011 concluded that the silverleaf whitefly is actually a species complex containing at least 40 morphologically indistinguishable species.

<i>Trichogramma</i> Genus of parasitic insects

Trichogramma is a genus of minute polyphagous wasps that are endoparasitoids of insect eggs. Trichogramma is one of around 80 genera from the family Trichogrammatidae, with over 200 species worldwide.

In agriculture and gardening, a beneficial organism is any organism that benefits the growing process, including insects, arachnids, other animals, plants, bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes. Benefits include pest control, pollination, and maintenance of soil health. The opposite of beneficial organisms are pests, which are organisms deemed detrimental to the growing process. There are many different types of beneficial organisms as well as beneficial microorganisms. Also, microorganisms have things like salt and sugar in them. Beneficial organisms include but are not limited to: Birds, Bears, Nematodes, Insects, Arachnids, and fungi. The ways that birds and bears are considered beneficial is mainly because they consume seeds from plant and spread them through feces. Birds also prey on certain insects that eat plants and hinder them from growing these insects are known as non beneficial organisms. Nematodes are considered beneficial because they will help compost and provide nutrients for the soil the plants are growing in. Insects and arachnids help the growing process because they prey on non beneficial organisms that consume plants for food. Fungi help the growing process by using long threads of mycelium that can reach very long distances away from the tree or plant and bring water and nutrients back to the tree or plant roots.

<i>Hippodamia convergens</i> Species of beetle

Hippodamia convergens, commonly known as the convergent lady beetle, is one of the most common lady beetles in North America and is found throughout the continent. They tend to live a variety of habitats, including grasslands and forests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Entomopathogenic nematode</span> Group of thread worms that attack insects

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are a group of nematodes, that cause death to insects. The term entomopathogenic has a Greek origin, with entomon, meaning insect, and pathogenic, which means causing disease. They are animals that occupy a bio control middle ground between microbial pathogens and predator/parasitoids. Although many other parasitic thread worms cause diseases in living organisms, entomopathogenic nematodes are specific in only infecting insects. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) live parasitically inside the infected insect host, and so they are termed as endoparasitic. They infect many different types of insects living in the soil like the larval forms of moths, butterflies, flies and beetles as well as adult forms of beetles, grasshoppers and crickets. EPNs have been found all over the world in a range of ecologically diverse habitats. They are highly diverse, complex and specialized. The most commonly studied entomopathogenic nematodes are those that can be used in the biological control of harmful insects, the members of Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae. They are the only insect-parasitic nematodes possessing an optimal balance of biological control attributes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasitoid wasp</span> Group of wasps

Parasitoid wasps are a large group of hymenopteran superfamilies, with all but the wood wasps (Orussoidea) being in the wasp-waisted Apocrita. As parasitoids, they lay their eggs on or in the bodies of other arthropods, sooner or later causing the death of these hosts. Different species specialise in hosts from different insect orders, most often Lepidoptera, though some select beetles, flies, or bugs; the spider wasps (Pompilidae) exclusively attack spiders.

<i>Aonidiella aurantii</i> Species of true bug

Aonidiella aurantii or red scale is an armored scale insect and a major pest of citrus. It is thought to be a native of South China but has been widely dispersed by the agency of man through the movement of infected plant material. In the United States it is known as California red scale. It was first found in California between 1868 and 1875, apparently brought there on planting material imported from Australia.

<i>Maruca vitrata</i> Species of moth

Maruca vitrata is a pantropical insect pest of leguminous crops like pigeon pea, cowpea, mung bean and soybean. Its common names include the maruca pod borer, bean pod borer, soybean pod borer, mung moth, and the legume pod borer. The species was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1787.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coccinellidae</span> Family of beetles

Coccinellidae is a widespread family of small beetles. They are commonly known as ladybugs in North America and ladybirds in the United Kingdom; "lady" refers to mother Mary. Entomologists use the names ladybird beetles or lady beetles to avoid confusion with true bugs. The more than 6,000 described species have a global distribution and are found in a variety of habitats. They are oval beetles with a domed back and flat underside. Many of the species have conspicuous aposematic (warning) colours and patterns, such as red with black spots, that warn potential predators that they taste bad.

<i>Coleomegilla maculata</i> Species of beetle

Coleomegilla maculata, commonly known as the spotted lady beetle, pink spotted lady beetle or twelve-spotted lady beetle, is a large coccinellid beetle native to North America. The adults and larvae feed primarily on aphids and the species has been used as a biological control agent. Based on name connotation and to avoid confusion with other species also called "spotted ladybeetle", spotted pink ladybeetle is probably the most appropriate common name for this species.

<i>Cotesia</i> Genus of wasps

Cotesia is a genus of braconid wasps first described by Peter Cameron in 1891. Some species parasitize caterpillars of species considered pests, and are used as biocontrol agents. Cotesia congregata parasitizes the tomato and the tobacco hornworms. C. glomerata and C. rubecula feed on the cabbage white and other white butterfly caterpillars. C. gonopterygis and C. risilis are host-specific and parasitize the common brimstone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tritrophic interactions in plant defense</span> Ecological interactions

Tritrophic interactions in plant defense against herbivory describe the ecological impacts of three trophic levels on each other: the plant, the herbivore, and its natural enemies. They may also be called multitrophic interactions when further trophic levels, such as soil microbes, endophytes, or hyperparasitoids are considered. Tritrophic interactions join pollination and seed dispersal as vital biological functions which plants perform via cooperation with animals.

Trichogramma japonicum is a minute wasp parasitoid from the Trichogrammatidae family in the order Hymenoptera. T. japonicum parasitizes the eggs of many pest species, especially Lepidoptera found in many monocultures. They are entomophagous parasitoids that deposit their eggs inside the host species' egg, consuming the host egg material and emerging from the egg once development is complete. T. japonicum can be found naturally in rice ecosystems, but are dispersed commercially to many monocultures as a biological control. The mitochondrial genomes of T. japonicum are significantly rearranged when comparing it to related insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UAV-IQ</span> Award-winning ag-tech company

UAV-IQ, an abbreviation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Intelligence, is an agricultural technology and services company specializing in farm management services through drone operations. Founded in 2015, UAV-IQ has gained recognition for its innovative approaches to integrated pest management (IPM).

References

  1. ↑ Flint, Maria Louise; Dreistadt, Steve H. (1998). Clark, Jack K. (ed.). Natural Enemies Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Biological Pest Control. University of California Press. ISBN   978-0-520-21801-7. Archived from the original on 15 May 2016.
  2. ↑ Unruh, Tom R. (1993). "Biological control". Orchard Pest Management Online, Washington State University. Archived from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  3. ↑ "Biological Control: Harry Smith Fund". Archived from the original on 21 April 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2017.
  4. ↑ "Inventory of the Paul H. DeBach Papers, 1921–1989 (bulk 1955–1980)". Online Archive of California. Archived from the original on 8 April 2017. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
  5. ↑ DeBach P., Hagen K. S. (1964). P. DeBach (ed.). Manipulation of entomophagous species. Reinhold. pp. 429–458.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  6. 1 2 Peng, Shijiang (1983). "Biological Control – One Of The Fine Traditions Of Ancient Chinese Agricultural Techniques". Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 1: 92–98. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20.
  7. 1 2 Coulson, J. R.; Vail, P. V.; Dix M.E.; Nordlund, D.A.; Kauffman, W.C.; Eds. 2000. 110 years of biological control research and development in the United States Department of Agriculture: 1883–1993. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. pages=3–11
  8. 1 2 "History and Development of Biological Control (notes)" (PDF). University of California Berkeley. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 November 2015. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  9. ↑ Reardon, Richard C. "Biological Control of The Gypsy Moth: An Overview". Southern Appalachian Biological Control Initiative Workshop. Archived from the original on 5 September 2016. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  10. ↑ "The Prickly Pear Story" (PDF). Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  11. ↑ McLeod J. H., McGugan B. M., Coppel H. C. (1962). A Review of the Biological Control Attempts Against Insects and Weeds in Canada. Technical Communication No. 2. Reading, England: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. 1 2 "What is Biological Control?". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 13 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  13. ↑ "Classical Biological Control: Importation of New Natural Enemies". University of Wisconsin. Archived from the original on 13 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  14. 1 2 Follett, P. A.; Duan, J. J. (2000). Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer.
  15. ↑ "How to Manage Pests. Cottony Cushion Scale". University of California Integrated Pest Management. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  16. ↑ Caltagirone, L. E. (1981). "Landmark Examples in Classical Biological Control". Annual Review of Entomology. 26: 213–232. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001241.
  17. ↑ "How to Manage Pests. Alfalfa". University of California Integrated Pest Management. Archived from the original on 25 May 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  18. ↑ "Indian River Lagoon Species Inventory: Alternanthera philoxeroides". Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort Pierce. 1 December 2007. Archived from the original on 28 March 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  19. ↑ "Salvinia (Salvinia molesta)" (PDF). CRC Weed Management. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  20. ↑ "A summary of research into biological control of salvinia in Australia" (PDF).
  21. ↑ Chikwenhere, Godfrey P.; Keswani, C. L. (1997). "Economics of biological control of Kariba weed (Salvinia molesta Mitchell) at Tengwe in north-western Zimbabwe: a case study". International Journal of Pest Management. 43 (2): 109–112. doi:10.1080/096708797228780.
  22. ↑ "Featured Creatures. European corn borer". University of Florida IFAS. Archived from the original on 30 May 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2016.
  23. ↑ Kuris, Armand M. (March 2003). "Did biological control cause extinction of the coconut moth, Levuana iridescens, in Fiji?". Biological Invasions. 5 (1): 133–141. doi:10.1023/A:1024015327707. S2CID   26094065.
  24. 1 2 "Augmentation: The Periodic Release of Natural Enemies". University of Wisconsin. Archived from the original on 17 March 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  25. 1 2 Hoddle, M. S.; Van Driesche, R. G.; Sanderson, J. P. (1998). "Biology and Use of the Whitefly Parasitoid Encarsia Formosa". Annual Review of Entomology. 43: 645–669. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.645. PMID   15012401.
  26. ↑ "Biological control. Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 15 November 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  27. ↑ Peter, K. V. (2009). Basics Of Horticulture. New India Publishing. p. 288. ISBN   978-81-89422-55-4. Archived from the original on 2017-04-07.
  28. ↑ Shapiro-Ilan, David I; Gaugler, Randy. "Biological Control. Nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae & Heterorhabditidae)". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 15 December 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  29. 1 2 "Conservation of Natural Enemies: Keeping Your "Livestock" Happy and Productive". University of Wisconsin. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  30. ↑ Gurr, Geoff M. (22 February 2016). "Multi-country evidence that crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture". Nature Plants. 2 (3): 16014. doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.14. PMID   27249349. S2CID   205458366.
  31. 1 2 Ruberson, John R. (1999). Handbook of Pest Management. CRC Press. pp. 428–432. ISBN   978-0-8247-9433-0. Archived from the original on 2017-04-10.
  32. ↑ Wilson, L. Ted; Pickett, Charles H.; Flaherty, Donald L.; Bates, Teresa A. "French prune trees: refuge for grape leafhopper parasite" (PDF). University of California Davis. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  33. ↑ Naranjo, Steven E. (8 June 2011). "Impacts of Transgenic Cotton on Integrated Pest Management". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 59 (11): 5842–5851. doi: 10.1021/jf102939c . PMID   20942488.
  34. ↑ Acorn, John (2007). Ladybugs of Alberta: Finding the Spots and Connecting the Dots . University of Alberta. p.  15. ISBN   978-0-88864-381-0.
  35. ↑ "Know Your Friends. Hover Flies". University of Wisconsin. Archived from the original on 4 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  36. ↑ Michalko, Radek; Dvoryankina, Viktoriya (1 June 2019). "Intraspecific phenotypic variation in functional traits of a generalist predator in an agricultural landscape". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 278: 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.018.
  37. ↑ Kaya, Harry K.; et al. (1993). "An Overview of Insect-Parasitic and Entomopathogenic Nematodes". In Bedding, R.A. (ed.). Nematodes and the Biological Control of Insect Pests. CSIRO Publishing. pp. 8–12. ISBN   978-0-643-10591-1. Archived from the original on 12 May 2016.
  38. 1 2 3 Capinera, John L.; Epsky, Nancy D. (1992-01-01). "Potential for Biological Control of Soil Insects in the Caribbean Basin Using Entomopathogenic Nematodes". The Florida Entomologist. 75 (4): 525–532. doi:10.2307/3496134. JSTOR   3496134.
  39. 1 2 Campos, Herrera R. (2015). Campos-Herrera, Raquel (ed.). Nematode Pathogenesis of insects and other pests (1 ed.). Springer. pp. 4–6, 31–32. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18266-7. hdl:11586/145351. ISBN   978-3-319-18266-7. S2CID   27605492.
  40. ↑ "Biological control: Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 18 June 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
  41. ↑ "Glasshouse red spider mite". Royal Horticultural Society. Archived from the original on 14 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  42. 1 2 3 "Biological Control of Two- Spotted Spider Mites". University of Connecticut. Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  43. ↑ Xuenong Xu (2004). Combined Releases of Predators for Biological Control of Spider Mites Tetranychus urticae Koch and Western Flower Thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande). Cuvillier Verlag. p. 37. ISBN   978-3-86537-197-3.
  44. ↑ Castells, Eva; Berenbaum, May R. (June 2006). "Laboratory Rearing of Agonopterix alstroemeriana, the Defoliating Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum L.) Moth, and Effects of Piperidine Alkaloids on Preference and Performance" (PDF). Environmental Entomology. 35 (3): 607–615. doi:10.1603/0046-225x-35.3.607. S2CID   45478867.
  45. ↑ "European Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
  46. ↑ Davis, David E. (20 November 1957). "The Use of Food as a Buffer in a Predator-Prey System". Journal of Mammalogy. 38 (4): 466–472. doi:10.2307/1376399. JSTOR   1376399.
  47. ↑ Lambert, Mark (September 2003). Control Of Norway Rats In The Agricultural Environment: Alternatives To Rodenticide Use (PDF) (PhD). University of Leicester. pp. 85–103. Archived from the original (Thesis) on 2017-11-11. Retrieved 2017-11-11.
  48. 1 2 Wodzicki, Kazimierz (11 November 1973). "Prospects for biological control of rodent populations". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 48 (4): 461–467. PMC   2481104 . PMID   4587482.
  49. ↑ Charter, Motti. "Using barn owls (Tyto alba erlangeri) for biological pest control in Israel" (PDF). World Owl Trust. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-11-11. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  50. ↑ Labuschagne, Lushka; Swanepoel, Lourens H.; Taylor, Peter J; Belmain, Steven R.; Keith, Mark (1 October 2016). "Are avian predators effective biological control agents for rodent pest management in agricultural systems?" (PDF). Biological Control. 101 (Supplement C): 94–102. Bibcode:2016BiolC.101...94L. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.07.003. hdl: 10019.1/111721 .
  51. ↑ Zadoks, Jan C. (16 October 2013). Crop Protection in Medieval Agriculture: Studies in pre-modern organic agriculture. Sidestone Press. ISBN   9789088901874 . Retrieved 11 November 2017– via Google Books.
  52. ↑ "How can I control rodents organically?". ATTRA - National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  53. ↑ Kross, Sara M.; Bourbour, Ryan P.; Martinico, Breanna L. (1 May 2016). "Agricultural land use, barn owl diet, and vertebrate pest control implications". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 223 (Supplement C): 167–174. Bibcode:2016AgEE..223..167K. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.002.
  54. ↑ "Barn Owl home range". The Barn Owl Trust. Retrieved 11 November 2017.
  55. ↑ Marten, Gerry; Caballero, Xenia; Romero, Hilda; Larios, Arnulfo (1 January 2019). "The Monte Verde Story (Honduras): Community Eradication of Aedes aegypti (the mosquito responsible for Zika, dengue fever, and chikungunya)". The EcoTipping Point Project. Retrieved 30 January 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  56. 1 2 3 4 5 He, Xueqing; Kiær, Lars Pødenphant; Jensen, Per Moestrup; Sigsgaard, Lene (2021). "The effect of floral resources on predator longevity and fecundity: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Biological Control . 153. Elsevier BV: 104476. Bibcode:2021BiolC.15304476H. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104476. ISSN   1049-9644. S2CID   228829546.
  57. ↑ He, Xueqing; Sigsgaard, Lene (2019-02-05). "A Floral Diet Increases the Longevity of the Coccinellid Adalia bipunctata but Does Not Allow Molting or Reproduction". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution . 7. Frontiers Media SA. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00006 . ISSN   2296-701X.
  58. ↑ "Parasitoid Wasps (Hymenoptera)". University of Maryland. Archived from the original on 27 August 2016. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  59. ↑ Hawkins, B. A.; Thomas, M. B.; Hochberg, M. E. (1993). "Refuge Theory and Biological Control". Science. 262 (5138): 1429–1432. Bibcode:1993Sci...262.1429H. doi:10.1126/science.262.5138.1429. PMID   17736826. S2CID   45268030.
  60. 1 2 Smith, S.M. (1996). "Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use". Annual Review of Entomology. 41: 375–406. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002111. PMID   15012334.
  61. ↑ Knoll, Valery; Ellenbroek, Thomas; Romeis, Jörg; Collatz, Jana (2017). "Seasonal and regional presence of hymenopteran parasitoids of Drosophila in Switzerland and their ability to parasitize the invasive Drosophila suzukii". Scientific Reports. 7 (40697): 40697. Bibcode:2017NatSR...740697K. doi:10.1038/srep40697. PMC   5241644 . PMID   28098183.
  62. ↑ Sithanantham, S.; Ballal, Chandish R.; Jalali, S.K.; Bakthavatsalam, N. (2013). Biological Control of Insect Pests Using Egg Parasitoids. Springer. p. 246. ISBN   978-81-322-1181-5. Archived from the original on 10 April 2017.
  63. ↑ Hoddle M. S.; Grandgirard J.; Petit J.; Roderick G. K.; Davies N. (2006). "Glassy-winged sharpshooter Ko'ed – First round – in French Polynesia". Biocontrol News and Information. 27 (3): 47N–62N.
  64. ↑ Smith, S. M.; Hubbes, M.; Carrow, J. R. (1986). "Factors affecting inundative releases of Trichogramma minutum Ril. Against the Spruce Budworm". Journal of Applied Entomology. 101 (1–5): 29–39. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1986.tb00830.x. S2CID   84398725.
  65. ↑ Bressan-Nascimento, S.; Oliveira, D.M.P.; Fox, E.G.P. (December 2008). "Thermal requirements for the embryonic development of Periplaneta americana (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae) with potential application in mass-rearing of egg parasitoids". Biological Control. 47 (3): 268–272. Bibcode:2008BiolC..47..268B. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.09.001.
  66. ↑ Paterson Fox, Eduardo Gonçalves; Bressan-Nascimento, Suzete; Eizemberg, Roberto (September 2009). "Notes on the Biology and Behaviour of the Jewel Wasp, Ampulex compressa (Fabricius, 1781) (Hymenoptera; Ampulicidae), in the Laboratory, Including First Record of Gregarious Reproduction". Entomological News. 120 (4): 430–437. doi:10.3157/021.120.0412. S2CID   83564852.
  67. ↑ Encouraging innovation in biopesticide development. Archived 15 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine European Commission (2008). Accessed on 9 January 2017
  68. ↑ Huffaker, C. B.; Berryman, A. A.; Laing, J. E. (1984). "Natural control of insect populations". In C. B. Huffaker and R. L. Rabb (ed.). Ecological Entomology. Wiley Interscience. pp.  359–398. ISBN   978-0-471-06493-0.
  69. ↑ Zettler, F W; Freeman, T E (1972). "Plant Pathogens as Biocontrols of Aquatic Weeds". Annual Review of Phytopathology . 10 (1). Annual Reviews: 455–470. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.002323. ISSN   0066-4286.
  70. ↑ Swan, L.A. (1964). Beneficial Insects . New York, Harper & Row. p.  249.
  71. ↑ Lemaux, Peggy G. (2008). "Genetically Engineered Plants and Foods: A Scientist's Analysis of the Issues (Part I)". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59: 771–812. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103840. PMID   18284373.
  72. 1 2 McGaughey, W. H.; Gould, F.; Gelernter, W. (1998). "Bt resistance management". Nat. Biotechnol. 16 (2): 144–6. doi:10.1038/nbt0298-144. PMID   9487517. S2CID   37947689.
  73. ↑ Kumar, PA; Malik, VS; Sharma, RP (1996). Insecticidal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Vol. 42. pp. 1–43. doi:10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70371-X. ISBN   9780120026425. PMID   8865583.{{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  74. ↑ Neppl, Camilla (26 May 2000). "Management of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins". Archived from the original on 21 April 2017.
  75. ↑ "Biological control: Paenibacillus popilliae". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 21 June 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
  76. ↑ Lenharo, Mariana (2023-10-27). "Dengue rates drop after release of modified mosquitoes in Colombia". Nature. 623 (7986): 235–236. Bibcode:2023Natur.623..235L. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03346-2. PMID   37891252. S2CID   264543032.
  77. ↑ Hall, I.M.; Dunn, P.H. (1957). "Entomophthorous Fungi Parasitic on the Spotted Alfalfa Aphid". Hilgardia. 27 (4): 159–181. doi: 10.3733/hilg.v27n04p159 .
  78. ↑ McNeil, Jim (2016). "Fungi for the biological control of insect pests". eXtension.org. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  79. ↑ Fry, William E. (2012). Principles of Plant Disease Management. Academic Press. p. 187. ISBN   978-0-08-091830-3.
  80. ↑ Santhosh, Kumar T.; Aparna, N. S. (2014). "Cordyceps Species as a Bio-Control Agent against Coconut Root Grub, Leucopholis coneophora Burm". Journal of Environmental Research and Development. 8 (3A): 614–618. Archived from the original on 2018-10-04. Retrieved 2017-03-20.
  81. ↑ Capinera, John L. (October 2005). "Featured creatures: Peach Aphid". University of Florida – Department of Entomology and Nematology. University of Florida. Archived from the original on 26 May 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  82. ↑ Li, Z.; Dong, Q.; Albright, T.P.; Guo, Q. (2011). "Natural and human dimensions of a quasi-natural wild species: the case of kudzu". Biological Invasions. 13 (10): 2167–2179. doi:10.1007/s10530-011-0042-7. S2CID   14948770.
  83. ↑ Beard, Karen H.; O'Neill, Eric M. (2005). "Infection of an invasive frog Eleutherodactylus coqui by the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Hawaii". Biological Conservation. 126 (4): 591–595. Bibcode:2005BCons.126..591B. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.07.004.
  84. ↑ Voigt K.; Marano, A. V.; Gleason, F. H. (2013). K. Esser & F. Kempken (ed.). Ecological & Economical Importance of Parasitic Zoosporic True Fungi (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 243–270.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  85. ↑ D'Amico, Vince. "Biological control: Baculoviruses". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 1 June 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
  86. ↑ Abrantes, Joana; van der Loo, Wessel; Le Pendu, Jacques; Esteves, Pedro J. (2012). "Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) and rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV): a review". Veterinary Research. 43 (12): 12. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-43-12 . PMC   3331820 . PMID   22325049.
  87. ↑ Strive, Tanja (16 July 2008). "Rabbit Calicivirus Disease (RCD)". Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Archived from the original (pdf) on April 15, 2014. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  88. ↑ Williams, David (26 May 2009). "Plan for 1080 drops in MacKenzie Basin". The Press. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  89. ↑ Kerwin, James L. "Biological control: Lagenidium giganteum". Cornell University. Archived from the original on 20 June 2016. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
  90. ↑ "Factsheet – Mucuna pruriens". Tropical Forages. Archived from the original on 15 May 2008. Retrieved 21 May 2008.
  91. ↑ Khan, Z.; Midega, C. A. O.; Amudavi, D. M.; Hassanali, A.; Pickett, J. A. (2008). "On-farm evaluation of the 'push–pull' technology for the control of stemborers and striga weed on maize in western Kenya". Field Crops Research. 106 (3): 224–233. Bibcode:2008FCrRe.106..224K. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.002.
  92. ↑ Bornemissza, G. F. (1976). "The Australian dung beetle project 1965–1975". Australian Meat Research Committee Review. 30: 1–30.
  93. ↑ Gould, Juli; Bauer, Leah. "Biological Control of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis)" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2011.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  94. ↑ Bauer, L.S.; Liu, H.-P.; Miller, D.; Gould, J. (2008). "Developing a classical biological control program for Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), an invasive ash pest in North America" (PDF). Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society. 53 (3&4): 38–39. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2011.
  95. ↑ "Biocontrol: Fungus and Wasps Released to Control Emerald Ash Borer". Science News. ScienceDaily. 26 April 2011. Archived from the original on 4 May 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2011.
  96. ↑ Parolin, Pia; Bresch, Cécile; Desneux, Nicolas; Brun, Richard; Bout, Alexandre; Boll, Roger; Poncet, Christine (2012). "Secondary plants used in biological control: A review". International Journal of Pest Management. 58 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1080/09670874.2012.659229.
  97. ↑ Messing, Russell H.; Wright, Mark G. (2006). "Biological control of invasive species: solution or pollution?". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 4 (3): 132–140. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0132:bcoiss]2.0.co;2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-10.
  98. ↑ National Research Council (1996). Ecologically Based Pest Management:New Solutions for a New Century. The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/5135. ISBN   978-0-309-05330-3. Archived from the original on 2016-07-25.
  99. ↑ "Biocontrol backfires again". Society for Conservation Biology. 2002. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2009.
  100. ↑ Wright, M. G.; Hoffmann, M. P.; Kuhar, T. P.; Gardner, J; Pitcher, SA (2005). "Evaluating risks of biological control introductions: A probabilistic risk-assessment approach". Biological Control. 35 (3): 338–347. Bibcode:2005BiolC..35..338W. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.02.002.
  101. ↑ "Cane Toad". Exotic Animals – Major Pests. Northern Territory Government, Australia. Archived from the original on 15 March 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011.
  102. ↑ "The cane toad (Bufo marinus)". Australian Government: Department of the Environment. 2010. Archived from the original on 12 July 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
  103. ↑ Rose, K. E.; Louda, S. M.; Rees, M. (2005). "Demographic and evolutionary impacts of native and invasive insect herbivores: a case study with Platte thistle, Cirsium canescens". Ecology. 86 (2): 453–465. doi:10.1890/03-0697.
  104. ↑ Operational Field Guide to the Propagation and Establishment of the Bioagent Larinus Planus (PDF). Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Forests. May 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-11-13. Retrieved 2019-01-30.
  105. ↑ Louda, Svaa M.; O'Brien, Charles W. (June 2002). "Unexpected Ecological Effects of Distributing the Exotic Weevil, Larinus planus (F.), for the Biological Control of Canada Thistle". Conservation Biology. 16 (3): 717–727. Bibcode:2002ConBi..16..717L. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00541.x. S2CID   2367835.
  106. ↑ Havens, Kayri; Jolls, Claudia L.; Marik, Julie E.; Vitt, Pati; McEachern, A. Kathryn; Kind, Darcy (October 2012). "Effects of a non-native biocontrol weevil, Larinus planus, and other emerging threats on populations of the federally threatened Pitcher's thistle, Cirsium pitcheri". Biological Conservation. 155: 202–211. Bibcode:2012BCons.155..202H. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.010.
  107. ↑ "Moving on from the mongoose: the success of biological control in Hawai'i". Kia'i Moku. MISC. 18 April 2012. Archived from the original on 19 June 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
  108. ↑ National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources (June 2000). Incorporating science, economics, and sociology in developing sanitary and phytosanitary standards in international trade: proceedings of a conference. National Academies Press. p. 97. ISBN   978-0-309-07090-4. Archived from the original on 11 June 2013. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
  109. ↑ "Gambusia Control". Archived from the original on 16 July 2016. Retrieved 2 July 2016.
  110. ↑ Charlet, Larry. "The Impact of Pesticides on Natural Enemies". University of Wisconsin Department of Entomology. Archived from the original on 14 October 2014. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  111. ↑ Heong, K. L.; Escalada, M. M. (1998). "Changing rice farmers' pest management practices through participation in a small-scale experiment". International Journal of Pest Management. 44 (4): 191–197. doi:10.1080/096708798228095.
  112. ↑ Robinson, A. S.; Hendrichs, J.; Dyck, V. A. (2021). Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. [S.l.]: CRC Press. ISBN   978-1-000-37776-7. OCLC   1225257814.
  113. ↑ USPending US20190208790A1,Efrat Lidor-Nili&Orly Noivirt-Brik,"Compositions, kits and methods for weed control",published 2019-07-11, assigned to Weedout Ltd.
  114. ↑ מורן, מירב (2020-12-30). "בלי כימיקלים: שתי מדעניות הגו רעיון פשוט ומהפכני לחיסול עשבים שוטים". הארץ (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  • Chapter 6, Elad, Yigal; Freeman, Stanley. "Biological Control of Fungal Plant Pathogens".  .
  1. 1 2 3 p. 94-5, II. Biocontrol Modes of Action
  2. 1 2 3 p. 94
  3. ↑ p. 93
  4. ↑ p. 93-4
  5. ↑ p. 95-6

Further reading

General

Effects on native biodiversity

Economic effects

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.