![]() | |
Clinical data | |
---|---|
Other names | TeMA; TA; 2,3,4,5-TeMA; 2,3,4,5-Tetramethoxyamphetamine; 2,3,4,5-Tetramethoxyphenylisopropylamine |
ATC code |
|
Legal status | |
Legal status |
|
Identifiers | |
| |
CAS Number | |
PubChem CID | |
ChemSpider | |
UNII | |
ChEMBL | |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | |
Chemical and physical data | |
Formula | C13H21NO4 |
Molar mass | 255.314 g·mol−1 |
3D model (JSmol) | |
| |
| |
(verify) |
Tetramethoxyamphetamine (TeMA), or 2,3,4,5-tetramethoxyamphetamine (2,3,4,5-TeMA), is a drug of the phenethylamine and amphetamine families related to mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine). [1] [2]
In Alexander Shulgin's book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known And Loved), the minimum dose is listed as 50 mg, and the duration as unknown but has been said to be relatively long-lived. [1] [2] TeMA is said to produce a threshold, disinhibited intoxication, mydriasis, and a headache. [1] [2] It is said to be roughly 6 times as potent as mescaline. [3]
TeMA has been said to be the only amphetamine with more than three methoxy groups known to be hallucinogenic. [2] However, subsequently, the psychedelic properties of TeMA were questioned. [4] Limited data exists about its pharmacological properties, metabolism, and toxicity. [5] [6] [7] It was first described in the scientific literature by at least 1975. [3] [2]
3.1.11. 2,3,4,5-Tetramethoxyphenylisopropylamine: Only one substituted phenylisopropylamine with more than three methoxyl groups has been established as being psychotomimetic. This is 2,3,4,5-tetramethoxyphenylisopropylamine (44, 2,3,4,5-tetramethoxyamphetamine). A threshold level of central activity is evident at a 30 mg dose orally, and a relatively long-lived disinhibited intoxication is produced by a 50-mg dosage. Compound (44) has been recorded as having six times the potency of mescaline (Shulgin et ai., 1969), but additional studies will be needed to establish the qualitative nature of its action.
Finally, 2,3,4,5-tetramethoxyamphetamine was reported earlier to be active in humans (Shulgin, 1978). However, the more recent description of its effects leaves some doubt about this conclusion (Shulgin and Shulgin, 1991).