Rehabilitation and reintegration of child soldiers

Last updated

A group of demobilised child soldiers in the DRC DRC- Child Soldiers.jpg
A group of demobilised child soldiers in the DRC

The rehabilitation and reintegration of child soldiers is defined by Child Soldiers International as:

Contents

"The process through which children formerly associated with armed forces/groups are supported to return to civilian life and play a valued role in their families and communities" [1]

A child soldier is "...any person below 18 years of age who is or who has been recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any capacity". [2]

Generally, reintegration efforts seek to return children to a safe environment, to create a sense of forgiveness on the behalf of the child's family and community through religious and cultural ceremonies and rituals, and encourage the reunification of the child with their family. [3] [4] Often the first step is to reunite the former child soldier with their family and provide adequate monetary and institutional support. [5] [4] Access to education is one of the most requested forms of support in post-conflict environments, but is often unavailable for economic reasons. [6] Some studies have shown that community-led reintegration is more beneficial than Western-driven trauma healing in dealing with the psychological challenges of reintegration. [4] [7]

There is often a stigma that children who belonged to armed groups are immoral, untrustworthy, or dangerous and therefore many individuals are rejected by community members, making reintegration difficult. [4] Reintegration efforts can become challenging when a child has committed war crimes, as in these cases stigma and resentment within the community can be exacerbated.

Female child soldiers commonly face additional barriers to successful reintegration. Girls report significantly higher rates of rape and sexual abuse during a conflict and are, therefore, confronted with unique, gender-specific challenges. They often face stronger stigmatisation on their return to the community since they are often considered tainted by sexual relationships that occurred outside of marriage. [1] They are often ostracised upon return, ridiculed, verbally and physically attacked and prohibited from marrying. [8]

Child soldiers

As defined by the Paris Principles, a child soldier is:

"...any person below 18 years of age who is or who has been recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, messengers, spies or for sexual purposes. The document is approved by the United Nations General Assembly. It does not only refer to a child who is taking or has taken a direct part in hostilities." [9]

Child soldiers can take on many roles, including active fighting, acting as spies or lookouts, or acting in support roles, such as medic, porter, cook, or agricultural labourer. [4] While some child soldiers are abducted and forced to serve, others choose to serve. In many countries choosing to serve in an armed group is the best alternative for the child. Many children join the military because these groups will provide food, shelter, and a sense of security. For instance, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the choices facing children are often “to join the military, become a street child, or die” (Refugees International 2002). Similar situations face children throughout the world, with cited instances in Columbia and Sri Lanka. [10] There is often a stigma that children who belonged to armed groups are immoral, untrustworthy, or dangerous and therefore many individuals are rejected by community members, making reintegration difficult. [4] Former soldiers often have to fabricate “second stories” and live in fear of their former identity being discovered and it leading to loss of status, discrimination, exclusion, or even retaliation. [4] There are also two areas of reintegration that warrant special consideration: female child soldiers and drug use among child soldiers. [11] [4] Child soldiers under the influence of drugs or who have contracted sexually transmitted diseases require additional programming specific to their unique needs. [11] [4]

Reintegration

Child Soldiers International defines reintegration as:

"The process through which children formerly associated with armed forces/groups are supported to return to civilian life and play a valued role in their families and communities" [1]

To facilitate the disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration of former members of armed groups, the United Nations introduced the Integrated DDR Standards in 2006. [12] Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) are applied strategies for executing successful peacekeeping operations, especially after civil wars. Disarmament entails the physical removal of the means of combat from ex-belligerents (weapons, ammunition, etc.), demobilisation entails the disbanding of armed groups, and reintegration describes the process of reintegrating former combatants into civilian society, reducing the possibility of a resurgence of armed conflict. DDR programmes usually have a number of components including a focus on psycho-social care, the return of ex-child soldiers to education, job training, and supporting local initiatives, usually through various regional partnerships). Such programmes usually aim for children to either go back to their families or be placed with foster families. [4]

Programs that aim to rehabilitate and reintegrate child soldiers, such as those sponsored by UNICEF, often emphasise three components: family reunification/community network, psychological support, and education/economic opportunity. [3] [4] These efforts take a minimum commitment of 3 to 5 years in order for programs to be successfully implemented. [3] [4] Generally, reintegration efforts seek to return children to a safe environment, to create a sense of forgiveness on the behalf of the child's family and community through religious and cultural ceremonies and rituals, and encourage the reunification of the child with their family. [3] [4]

Reintegration efforts can become challenging when a child has committed war crimes, as in these cases stigma and resentment within the community can be exacerbated. In situations such as these, it is important that the child's needs are balanced with a sense of community justice. [4] If such situations are not addressed children face an increased likelihood of re-enlistment. [1]

Reintegration programme components

Family reunification

Often the first step in the reintegration of child soldiers is family unification, that is reuniting the former child soldier with their families and providing adequate monetary and institutional support. [5] [4] When this is not possible attempts can be made to place former child soldiers in foster families or to assist the former child soldier with independent living. [4] In Angola a family reunification project was implemented entitled "self-building program" which supported former child soldiers and their families in constructing a house. [6] There may be concerns as to whether the family will accept the child after they have been a soldier. In Uganda this acceptance was assisted through the use of cleansing ceremonies, which assisted in the removal of community stigmatisation by "decontaminating" the child. [6]

Community support and acceptance

A former Ugandan child soldier retrained as a bricklayer From child soldier to bricklayer UK aid at work in northern Uganda (6721454863).jpg
A former Ugandan child soldier retrained as a bricklayer

Community networks can also be instrumental in the reintegration of former child soldiers with their families and communities. Reintegration programs often aim to find a constructive social role for the former child soldier. Working in partnership with local NGOs can be important for capacity-building and to facilitate sustainable efforts that will last after international actors have left. [7] In Angola a community-based network called Catechist has a partnership with approximately 200 churches. [6] The Catechist was perceived as being neutral, having a sense of authority, and adherence to international humanitarian law. [6] Given this, the network, respected by the community, has the capacity for outreach and was able to provide ongoing support the reintegration process. [6] The broader community has also been witness to and a victim of the armed conflict. A focus on community healing is also an aspect of reintegration, because community healing can lead to community acceptance. Many armed conflicts occur among collectivistic societies and therefore this can be a better-suited approach. [7] By involving the community in the healing processids outsider imposition of values and understanding. [7] Before community healing can occur a more comprehensive approach is needed to remedy many systemic problems in war zones such as the short supply of water, food, shelter and other basic necessities. [7] There is often a lack of professional, institutional, and economic support for this form of family and community reintegration. [5] [1]

Psychological support

As part of their training child soldiers undergo a process of asocialisation and, consequently, may be resistant to changing their identity from that of a child soldier. [4] Studies have shown that psychosocial approaches, a psychological process that takes place in the community, are more beneficial than Western-driven trauma healing in dealing with the psychological aspects of reintegration. [4] [7] Some of these approaches encompass emotional expression, group and individual counselling, cultural rituals, social reconstruction and emotional reintegration. [7] These psychosocial approaches support physical health as well as cognitive, emotional and moral development. [6] Through partnerships with local NGOs clinical psychologists are often able to train locals to administer these interventions empowering the community more directly in the healing process, instead of silencing local healers and local practices. [7] Given this reintegration programs emphasise the opportunity for former child soldiers to establish trusting and consistent relationships with adults and also emphasise a family-based environment. [4] Traditional rituals and family and community mediation can help to address the antisocial and aggressive behaviour a child soldier may have developed, and help the child recover from stressful and traumatic experiences. [4]

Education and economic opportunity

Education and economic opportunities help former child soldiers to establish new identities for themselves and to empower them to take active control of their lives. [6] [5] [4] Access to education is one of the most requested forms of support in post-conflict environments. It is often unavailable for economic reasons. [6] Access to formal education remains a challenge for a multitude of reasons as the need to earn an income can supersede the desire for education, families may not be able to afford education, schools are often destroyed in conflicts, teachers may have fled or have been killed, or there may be difficulty in obtaining documentation to enroll in educational institutions. In addition child soldiers frequently feel shame for their actions or there is resentment between the former child soldiers and their classmates. [6] [4] It is important to strike a balance between education and economic opportunities. [6] [4] Key aspects of striking this balance often include the creation of accelerated education programmes which suit the needs of the former child soldiers, focusing education on approaches that can generate income, such as market-appropriate vocational training and the inclusion of child soldier reintegration in the post-conflict economic policy of the country in question. [6]

Female child soldiers

Girls report significantly higher rates of rape and sexual abuse during a conflict and are, therefore, confronted with unique, gender-specific challenges. They often face stronger stigmatisation on their return to the community since they are often considered tainted by sexual relationships that occurred outside of marriage. [1] They are often ostracised upon return, ridiculed, verbally and physically attacked and prohibited from marrying. [13]

Between 1990 and 2002, female soldiers were involved in internal armed conflicts in 36 countries. [4] In countries such as Angola, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, and Uganda as many as 40% of child soldiers were female. [4] In Colombia many girls joined armed groups for ideological or financial reasons. Being in love with an existing soldier is also a common reason cited. [10] In Colombia and Cambodia girls are also often given as “tax payment” by parents. [4] While serving as part of a fighting group is a traumatic experience for any child, the gender of the child must be taken into account in order to ensure that both males and females get effective help. Local anecdotes suggest that females are often referred to as “wives”, “rewards for soldiers’ valor”, or victims of social terror. Other common roles include spies, porters, or minesweepers. [4]

A 13-year-old fighter from Honduras reports:

Later I joined the armed struggle. I had all the inexperience and the fears of a little girl. I found out that girls were obliged to have sexual relations to alleviate the sadness of the combatants. And who alleviated our sadness after going with someone we hardly knew? [14]

Health and psycho-social effects after reintegration

This former DRC child soldier first picked up a gun when he was 12. Since demobilising, his community has largely welcomed him back. Former soldier, South Kivu (12188068824).jpg
This former DRC child soldier first picked up a gun when he was 12. Since demobilising, his community has largely welcomed him back.

Evidence has shown that female soldiers are released (as part of a DDR program) at lower rates than male soldiers. [15] Many female child soldiers suffer from a variety of health effects including pregnancy and birth complications, vaginal and cervical tearing and sores, and those relating to gender inequalities such as poorer health care, heavier workloads, and less freedom. [16] Other health effects include STDs and HIV which may be passed down during pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding. [4] The consequences of pregnancies depend on the practices of the armed group concerned. Females could either be encouraged to carry the pregnancy, to create future fighters or be forced to abort. After childbirth female soldiers are often required to give their child to peasants to raise, to be reclaimed when he or she reaches fighting age. [4]

During reintegration many female former child soldiers experienced a variety of negative psycho-social effects. For example former Sierra Leonean female child soldiers were more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and lowered self-confidence than their male counterparts. [17] Reintegrated females often do not desire to enter into any marital relationships, sometimes choosing to withdraw from men altogether. This often results in further social stigma and increased societal isolation. [4] Female child soldiers may be additionally stigmatised by their family or community for having had sexual relations and/or children out of marriage. [4] [18] They may not want to participate in DDR programmes as this would draw attention to their association with an armed group. [19] DDR programs can also be too militarised to attract female enrolment; for example by failing to provide childcare, women's clothes or sanitary supplies. [18] [10] [20]

Case studies

Colombia

The Colombian armed conflict involves a number of groups including the Colombian government’s National Army, guerilla groups (such as the National Liberation Army and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia), and paramilitary groups such as the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia. In 2004 Colombia ranked fourth for the highest use of child soldiers in the world. As of 2012 there are about 5,000–14,000 children in armed groups in the country (Watchlist 2004, Watchlist 2012). Current DDR programs in Colombia are carried out by the Colombian Family Welfare Institute (ICBF) and have focused on a post-conflict framework. [4] Former Colombian child soldiers reported the most difficult parts of reintegration as being the transition from rural to urban life, reuniting with their families, and being removed from a context of organised armed violence. [4]

Existing DDR programs in Colombia predominantly focus on protecting former soldiers from each other, rather than addressing the fear and stigma that each group suffers. Many in Colombia have viewed the services granted under DDR programmes as granting impunity to these individuals for former crimes. Instead, advocates have pushed for a public awareness through campaigns and advocacy in order to eliminate existing stigma (Thomas 2008). [4]

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone endured a civil war from 1991 to 2002. Child soldiers played a key role in the Revolutionary United Front and a lesser role in government forces and various militias. [21] UNICEF states that during this period 84,666 children were officially documented as missing. [22] The conflict seemed to come to an end with the signing of the Lome accord in 1999, but fighting did not cease until 2000. [23] The disarmament and demobilisation portions ended in January 2002. [24]

The rehabilitation and reintegration process focused primarily on community-based solutions. The main goal was to reunite children with their families. To this end a number of Interim Care Centers (ICCs) were established and administered by child protection NGOs. [25] These ICCs sought to serve as temporary stops for children while their families were identified. 98% of demobilised children were reunited with one or both parents, older siblings or extended family. [26] ICCs kept children for no longer than six weeks before returning them to family or foster care. [22] ICCs began the process of rehabilitating former child soldiers into society. They separated them from the command structures that dominated much of their lives [22] re-accustomed them to domestic life. This included performing chores, living to a normal schedule, receiving an education, and playing with other children. [27] Notably, the ICCs were not focused on providing formal, western psychotherapy sessions and fewer than 100 children received therapy. [22]

Reintegration centred on easing former child soldiers back into their communities. Parents and family members were often eager to welcome back children who had been child soldiers. To help them, various NGOs provided local family classes on how to deal with children who had been traumatised by the war. [22] The local community, on the other hand, was less accepting of these children and often attacked aid workers for being associated with child soldiers. This did not apply to children who were part of the pro-government Civil Defense Force, which was widely seen as helpful by local communities. [22] Wider social acceptance is shown in studies to have been crucial in easing trauma for child soldiers. [28] To this end, communities were educated as to the traumas experienced by child soldiers as well as given help to organise traditional cleansing ceremonies. Additionally, children who were branded with symbols of the groups who abducted them were given plastic surgery to remove scars or tattoos. [29] Beyond this, schools received additional funding in order to incentivise the intake of former child soldiers. [28]

92% of the participants in UNICEF’s formal DDR program were males. [22] Former female child soldiers were often not included out of personal shame or due to not being combatants. Many female children were used for sex or married in bush weddings. [30] These marriages tended to keep females isolated and their husbands would often not allow them to engage in rehabilitation programmes. [31] ICCs were often separated by gender leading to female former child soldiers reporting instances of harassment or assault by males. [18]

South Sudan

The Second Sudanese Civil War (1983–2002) was fought between the central Sudanese Government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). [32] In 2005 a comprehensive peace agreement (CPA) was signed by both parties. The immediate release of all child soldiers was supposed to occur after the signing of the CPA, but this did not occur. Some, but not all, child soldiers were released from the SPLA. DDR policies were developed to help former soldiers and create a more stable infrastructure aimed at ensuring safety for the future. Creating the DDR policies was difficult because neither the government nor the SPLA shared the numbers or demographics of their soldiers. [33]

Child soldiers were labelled a "special group" and in the drafting of the interim disarmament demobilisation and reintegration programme (IDDRP) they were given special protections. After the signing of the CPA policy-makers began working on a multi-year DDR program. The DDR programmes included health checks, education opportunities, employment opportunities, bundles of supplies, and other services. After DDR began to be implemented it was discovered that most of the people who were being chosen to participate were not actually active members of the military. Therefore many of the people who had left the ranks of the military were being drawn back in order to take part in the DDR program. Largely the DDR efforts for child soldiers in South Sudan failed, mainly due to remaining tensions and a likelihood of continued war. [34]

In 2013, the conflict resumed in South Sudan after the president and vice-president declared war on each other. As of March 2018 the war is still ongoing. [32] In 2015 there were a reported 16,000 children being used by armed groups in South Sudan. [35] Due to the armed conflict, in 2015 more than half of elementary- and primary-school-aged children were not receiving an education. [36] Researchers have argued that education is vital in preventing re-recruitment, but accessing education is difficult for demobilised former child soldiers because of the effects of war, socioeconomic status, and a lack of educational structures. [37] Children in South Sudan who have participated in or been involved with the conflict report feelings of isolation, stigma, and exclusion. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Children in the military</span> The conscription and use of adolescents in warfare

Children in the military, including state armed forces, non-state armed groups, and other military organizations, may be trained for combat, assigned to support roles, such as cooks, porters/couriers, or messengers, or used for tactical advantage such as for human shields, or for political advantage in propaganda. Children have been recruited for participation in military operations and campaigns throughout history and in many cultures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone</span> United Nations peacekeeping operation in Sierra Leone from 1999 to 2006

The United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) was a United Nations peacekeeping operation in Sierra Leone from 1999 to 2006. It was created by the United Nations Security Council in October 1999 to help with the implementation of the Lomé Peace Accord, an agreement intended to end the Sierra Leonean civil war. UNAMSIL expanded in size several times in 2000 and 2001. It concluded its mandate at the end of 2005, the Security Council having declared that its mission was complete.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demobilization</span> Decommissioning of military personnel

Demobilization or demobilisation is the process of standing down a nation's armed forces from combat-ready status. This may be as a result of victory in war, or because a crisis has been peacefully resolved and military force is no longer necessary. The opposite of demobilization is mobilization, which is the act of calling up forces for active military service. Forceful demobilization of a defeated enemy is called demilitarization.

The Afghan New Beginnings Programme aimed to disarm, demobilise and reintegrate thousands of combatants from the Afghan Militia Forces/Afghan Army and provide them opportunities to join the Afghan National Army, Afghan National Police or an alternative line of work. The government of Afghanistan and the ANBP estimated that there might be 100,000 former combatants who could be integrated into civilian life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red Hand Day</span> Day protesting the use of child soldiers

On Red Hand Day or the International Day against the Use of Child Soldiers, February 12 each year since 2002, pleas are made to political leaders and events are staged around the world to draw attention to child soldiers: children under the age of 18 who participate in military organizations of all kinds. Red Hand Day aims to call for action to stop this practice, and support children affected by it.

Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR), or disarmament, demobilisation, repatriation, reintegration and resettlement (DDRRR) are strategies used as a component of peace processes, and is generally the strategy employed by all UN Peacekeeping Operations following civil wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Education in Sierra Leone</span>

Education in Sierra Leone is legally required for all children for six years at primary level and three years in junior secondary education, but a shortage of schools and teachers has made implementation impossible. The Sierra Leone Civil War resulted in the destruction of 1,270 primary schools and in 2001 67 percent of all school-age children were out of school. The situation has improved considerably since then with primary school enrollment doubling between 2001 and 2005 and the reconstruction of many schools since the end of the war. However, there is still a long ways to go. In 2004, Junior secondary school enrollment was only 17% of primary school enrollment, and senior secondary school enrollment was only 8% of primary school education.

Sudan is a source country for men, women and children trafficked internally for the purposes of forced labor and sexual exploitation. Sudan is also a transit and destination country for Ethiopian women trafficked abroad for domestic servitude. Sudanese women and girls are trafficked within the country, as well as possibly to Middle Eastern countries such as Qatar, for domestic servitude. U.S. State Department's Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons placed the country in "Tier 3" in 2017. In 2020, Sudan was once again placed in the "Tier 3" category, since the latest Trafficking in Persons report showed that South Sudan had not made any prosecutions of human traffickers or convicted any individuals in connection with forced conscription of children into the armed forces in the last 5 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1270</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 1999

United Nations Security Council resolution 1270, adopted unanimously on 22 October 1999, after recalling resolutions 1171 (1998), 1181 (1998), 1231 (1999) and 1260 (1999) on the situation in Sierra Leone and Resolution 1265 (1999) on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, established the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) to assist in the implementation of the Lomé Peace Accord.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1289</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2000

United Nations Security Council resolution 1289, adopted unanimously on 7 February 2000, after recalling resolutions 1171 (1998), 1181 (1998), 1231 (1999), 1260 (1999), 1265 (1999) and 1270 (1999) on the situation in Sierra Leone, the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) for a period of six months and expanded its military component.

The Free Children from War Conference was a conference co-hosted by the French government and UNICEF on 5–6 February 2007 in Paris, France. The goal of the conference was to bring together countries, non-governmental organizations, and international organizations to discuss the issue of child soldiers. The 59 involved countries signed the Paris Principles and Paris Commitments, which update the Cape Town Principles and outline a practical approach to preventing the use of child soldiers and the reintegration of current child soldiers. The Principles define a child associated with an armed force or armed group as:

... any person below 18 years of age who is or who has been recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, cooks, porters, messengers, spies or for sexual purposes. It does not only refer to a child who is taking or has taken a direct part in hostilities..

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child soldiers in Africa</span> African children as combatants

Child soldiers in Africa refers to the military use of children under the age of 18 by national armed forces or other armed groups in Africa. Typically, this classification includes children serving in non-combatant roles, as well as those serving in combatant roles. In 2008, it was estimated that 40 percent of child soldiers worldwide were in Africa, and the use of child soldiers in armed conflict was increasing faster than any other continent. Additionally, average age of children recruited as soldiers appears to be decreasing. As of 2017, the UN listed that seven out of fourteen countries recruiting and using child soldiers in state forces or armed groups were in Africa: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan.

Roughly 10,000-14,000 child soldiers in Sierra Leone fought between 1991 and 2002 in the Sierra Leone Civil War. Children fought on both sides of the conflict. Nearly half of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), and a quarter of the government armed forces consisted of children aged 8–14 years old.

As many as 10,000 children were used by armed groups in the armed conflict in the Central African Republic (CAR) between 2012 and 2015, and as of 2016 the problem persists nationwide. The mainly Muslim “Séléka” coalition of armed groups and the predominantly Christian, "Anti-Balaka" militias have both used children in this way; some are as young as eight.

The number of children in armed conflict zones are around 250 million. They confront physical and mental harms from war experiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of children in the military</span> History of recruiting children for military operations

Children in the military are children who are associated with military organizations, such as state armed forces and non-state armed groups. Throughout history and in many cultures, children have been involved in military campaigns. For example, thousands of children participated on all sides of the First World War and the Second World War. Children may be trained and used for combat, assigned to support roles such as porters or messengers, or used for tactical advantage as human shields or for political advantage in propaganda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Afghan peace process</span> Peace processes of the armed conflict in Afghanistan since 1978

Peace processes have taken place during several phases of the Afghanistan conflict, which has lasted since the 1978 Saur Revolution.

UNICEF's Early Marriage: A Harmful Traditional Practice report characterizes child marriage as a harmful institution that often exposes young women in developing nations to damaging domestic, health, and sexual conditions. The report also highlights the practice as a human rights violation. In World Vision's "Before She's Ready: 15 Places Girls Marry by 15", the organization highlights the socioeconomic consequences of child marriage on girls, noting that many girls are forced to stop their schooling as a result of their marriages. With the denial of education, girl brides are often not able to make income as adults or become politically active citizens.

The First Liberian Civil War began in 1989, when Charles Taylor 's National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) forces invaded the country in rebellion against the regime of Samuel Doe, who came to power through the 1980 Liberian coup d'état. Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD), Movement for Democracy in Liberia (MODEL), the United Liberation Movement for Democracy (ULIMO), as well as the NPFL utilized children as an integral aspect of their forces over the course of both armed conflicts, organizing them into factions such as the Small Boys Unit. The First Liberian Civil War as well as the Second Liberian Civil War saw thousands of children were forced to participate in armed conflict, resulting in an estimated figure of 21,000 child soldiers in need of demobilization, rehabilitation, and reintegration following the end of the Second Liberian Civil War in 2003, which concluded with the signage of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. In the years following the war, the Liberian government was implemented measures to promote their international and national commitment to reintegrating and supporting former Children in the military.

Girl soldiers have been recruited by armed forces and groups in the majority of conflicts in which child soldiers are used. A wide range of rough estimates of their percentage among child soldiers is reported in literature, but scarcity of high-quality data poses problems for establishing their numbers.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Reintegration". Child Soldiers International. Archived from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
  2. UNICEF (2007). "Paris Principles: Principles and guidelines on children associated with armed forces or armed groups" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 October 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "How did Britain let 250,000 underage soldiers fight in WW1?". BBC Guides. Archived from the original on 21 March 2018. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Conflict Prevention and Reconstruction Unit. "Child Soldiers: Prevention, Demobilization, and Reintegration" May 2002
  5. 1 2 3 4 Thomas, Virginia (2008). Overcoming Lost Childhood: Lessons from the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Former Child Soldiers in Colombia. London, England: Y Care International.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Beth Verhey, "Child Soldiers: Preventing, Demobilizing, and Reintegrating", Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 23, World Bank: November 2001, p. 16
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wessels, Michael G (2007). "Post-Conflict Healing and Reconstruction for Peace: The Power of Social Mobilization". Fear of Persecution: Global Human Rights, International Law, and Human Well-Being. Lanham, MD, US: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 257–278.
  8. Stark, Lindsay (2006). "Cleansing the Wounds of War: An Examination of Traditional Healing, Psychosocial Health and Reintegration in Sierra Leone" (PDF). Intervention. 4 (3): 206–218. doi:10.1097/WTF.0b013e328011a7d2. S2CID   71934691. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
  9. UNICEF (2007). "Paris Principles: Principles and guidelines on children associated with armed forces or armed groups" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 October 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2018.
  10. 1 2 3 "" 'One cannot take away the stain': Rejection and stigma among former child soldiers in Colombia": Correction to Denov and Marchand (2014)". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 20 (4): 411. 2014. doi:10.1037/pac0000066.
  11. 1 2 Norman Davies, Rising '44: The Battle for Warsaw, Archived 6 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine Pan Books 2004 p.603
  12. "" 'One cannot take away the stain': Rejection and stigma among former child soldiers in Colombia": Correction to Denov and Marchand (2014)". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 20 (4): 411–411. doi:10.1037/pac0000066.[ verification needed ]
  13. Stark, Lindsay (2006). "Cleansing the Wounds of War: An Examination of Traditional Healing, Psychosocial Health and Reintegration in Sierra Leone" (PDF). Intervention. 4 (3): 206–218. doi:10.1097/WTF.0b013e328011a7d2. S2CID   71934691. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
  14. "A/51/306 Impact of Armed Conflict on Children". www.un.org. Archived from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
  15. Mazurana, Dyan E.; McKay, Susan A.; Carlson, Khristopher C.; Kasper, Janel C. "Girls in fighting forces and groups: Their recruitment, participation, demobilization, and reintegration". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 8 (2): 97–123. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac0802_01.[ verification needed ]
  16. Mazurana, Dyan E.; McKay, Susan A.; Carlson, Khristopher C.; Kasper, Janel C. "Girls in fighting forces and groups: Their recruitment, participation, demobilization, and reintegration". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 8 (2): 97–123. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac0802_01.[ verification needed ]
  17. Betancourt, Theresa S.; Borisova, Ivelina I.; de la Soudière, Marie; Williamson, John (2011). "Sierra Leone's Child Soldiers: War Exposures and Mental Health Problems by Gender". Journal of Adolescent Health. 49 (1): 21–28 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
  18. 1 2 3 Verhey, Beth (2004). Reaching the Girls: Study on Girls Associated with Armed Forces and Groups. Save the Children UK and the NGO Group: CARE, IFESH and IRC. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
  19. Save the Children. Forgotten Casualties of War: Girls in armed conflict. 2005. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
  20. Mazurana, Dyan E.; McKay, Susan A.; Carlson, Khristopher C.; Kasper, Janel C. (2002). "Girls in Fighting Forces and Groups: Their Recruitment, Participation, Demobilization, and Reintegration". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 8 (2): 97–123 – via OhioLINK.
  21. John-Peter., Pham (2005). Child soldiers, adult interests : the global dimensions of the Sierra Leonean tragedy. New York: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN   9781594546716. OCLC   61724289.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Williamson, John (November 2006). "The disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of child soldiers: social and psychological transformation in Sierra Leone". Intervention. 4 (3): 185–205. doi:10.1097/wtf.0b013e328011a7fb. S2CID   72815640.
  23. Hirsch, John (2001). Sierra Leone: Diamonds and the Struggle for Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  24. The Disarmament Demobilisation and Reintegration of Children Associated with Fighting Forces: Lessons Learned in Sierra Leone 1998 - 2002. Unicef.
  25. "Demobilized child soldiers transferred to IRC Care centers in Sierra Leone". ReliefWeb. Archived from the original on 1 March 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
  26. From Conflict to Hope: Children in Sierra Leone's Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration Programme. UNICEF. 2004.
  27. Betancourt, Theresa S.; Simmons, Stephanie; Borisova, Ivelina; Brewer, Stephanie E.; Iweala, Uzo; de la Soudière, Marie (November 2008). "High Hopes, Grim Reality: Reintegration and the Education of Former Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone". Comparative Education Review. 52 (4): 565–587. doi:10.1086/591298. PMC   2662600 . PMID   19337570.
  28. 1 2 Betancourt, Theresa Stichick; Borisova, Ivelina Ivanova; Williams, Timothy Philip; Brennan, Robert T.; Whitfield, Theodore H.; De La Soudiere, Marie; Williamson, John; Gilman, Stephen E. (15 July 2010). "Sierra Leone's Former Child Soldiers: A Follow-Up Study of Psychosocial Adjustment and Community Reintegration: Sierra Leone's Former Child Soldiers". Child Development. 81 (4): 1077–1095. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01455.x. PMC   2921972 . PMID   20636683.
  29. Reintegration of Child Soldiers in Sierra Leone. USAID. 2005.
  30. Veale, Angela; Worthen, Miranda; McKay, Susan (2017). "Transformative spaces in the social reintegration of former child soldier young mothers in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Northern Uganda". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 23 (1): 58–66. doi:10.1037/pac0000212. hdl: 10468/3658 . S2CID   151534685.
  31. Coulter, Chris (2004). "Assessment of the 'Girls Left Behind' Project for Girls and Young Women Who Did not enter DDR". Evaluation Conducted for Unicef Child Protection.
  32. 1 2 3 Muller, Brigitte; Munslow, Barry; O'Dempsey, Tim (January 2017). "When community reintegration is not the best option: interethnic violence and the trauma of parental loss in South Sudan: Violence, Trauma and Parental Loss". The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 32 (1): 91–109. doi:10.1002/hpm.2311. PMID   26311614. S2CID   19830800.
  33. Fegley, Randall (2008). "Comparative Perspectives on the Rehabilitation of Ex-Slaves and Former Child Soldiers with Special Reference to Sudan" (PDF). African Studies Quarterly. 10: 1–35. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  34. Baas, Saskia (2012). From Civilians to Soldiers and from Soldiers to Civilians: Mobilization and Demobilization in Sudan. Amsterdam University Press. ISBN   978-90-8964-396-4.[ page needed ]
  35. UNICEF. "UNICEF SOUTH SUDAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015" (PDF). unicef. UNICEF SOUTH unicef. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  36. UNICEF. "UNICEF SOUTH SUDAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015" (PDF). unicef. UNICEF SOUTH unicef. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 March 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  37. Skårås, Merethe (2017). "Educational and Social Challenges in the Reintegration Process of Former Child Soldiers". The Power of Resistance. Advances in Education in Diverse Communities: Research, Policy and Praxis. Vol. 12. pp. 243–263. doi:10.1108/S1479-358X20140000012012. ISBN   978-1-78350-461-9.