Southern accent (United States)

Last updated
Based upon the 2006 Atlas of North American English, the darkest color indicates cities with a high degree of Southern accent features, the medium color those with a middling degree, and the lightest color those with a low degree. Southern dialect map.png
Based upon the 2006 Atlas of North American English , the darkest color indicates cities with a high degree of Southern accent features, the medium color those with a middling degree, and the lightest color those with a low degree.

In the United States, a Southern accent or simply Southern is the sound system of the modern Southern regional dialect of American English. [2]

Contents

Most English of the Southern United States, particularly as spoken by white Southerners, [3] [4] underwent several major sound changes from the late 19th century to the middle of the 20th century, during which a rural-originating sound system, including two vowel shifts, expanded geographically through the whole region. This regional accent is fairly unified, contrasting with the more diverse and localized sound systems of the 19th-century Southern dialects. [5] Still, there remains ongoing variation in the Southern accent regarding potential differences based on a speaker's exact sub-region, age, ethnicity, and other social factors.

General modern phonology

The South as a wide-ranging accent region of the U.S. as distinct from, say, the West or the Northeast, generally includes the pronunciation features below.

Southern Vowel Shift

The Southern Vowel Shift (or simply the Southern Shift in linguistics) is a chain shift of vowels that is occurring or fully completed in most Southern dialects, especially 20th-century ones; the urban areas where it is documented at the most advanced stage includes in the "Inland South" (i.e. an Appalachian region away from both the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts) as well as much of central and northern Texas. [6] This 3-stage chain movement of vowels is first triggered by Stage 1 which dominates the entire Southern region, followed by Stage 2 which covers almost all of that area, and Stage 3 which is concentrated only in speakers of the two aforementioned core sub-regions.

Back Upglide Shift

The vowel /aʊ/, as in loud or now, shifts forward and upward to [æʊ] (also possibly realized, variously, as [æjə~æo~ɛɔ~eo]), thus allowing the back vowel /ɔ/, as in thought or hawk, to fill an area similar to the former position of /aʊ/ in the mouth, becoming lowered and developing an upglide [ɑɒ]. This, in turn, allows (though only for the most advanced Southern speakers) the upgliding vowel /ɔɪ/, as in choice or boy, to lose its glide and become [ɔ], particularly before /l/ (for instance, causing the word boils to sound something like the British or New York City pronunciations of balls ). [15]

Southern drawl

Southern vowel breaking, popularly known as a Southern drawl, is the pronunciation of the short front pure vowels as gliding vowels, making one-syllable words sound as if they might have two syllables. Thus, pet and pit may sound to other English speakers more like pay-it and pee-it. All three stages of the Southern Shift appear to be related to this phenomenon.

The "short a", "short e", and "short i" vowels are all affected, developing a glide up from their original starting position to [j], and then often back down to a schwa vowel: /æ/[æjə~ɛjə]; /ɛ/[ɛjə~ejə]; and /ɪ/[ɪjə~ijə], respectively. Appearing mostly after the mid-19th century, this phenomenon is on the decline, being most typical of Southern speakers born before 1960. [13]

Other vowel features

The merger of pin and pen in the U.S. In the purple areas, the merger is complete for most speakers. Note the exclusion of the New Orleans region, Southern Florida, and the Lowcountry region of South Carolina and Georgia. The purple area in California consists of the Bakersfield and Kern County area, where migrants from the Southern States settled during the Dust Bowl. Pin-pen.svg
The merger of pin and pen in the U.S. In the purple areas, the merger is complete for most speakers. Note the exclusion of the New Orleans region, Southern Florida, and the Lowcountry region of South Carolina and Georgia. The purple area in California consists of the Bakersfield and Kern County area, where migrants from the Southern States settled during the Dust Bowl.

Table of vowels

A list of typical Southern vowels [29] [30]
English diaphoneme Southern phoneme Example words
Pure vowels (monophthongs)
/æ/ [æ~æɛ̯æ̯~æjə̯]act, pal, trap
[æjə̯~eə̯] ham, land, yeah
/ɑː/ [ɑ]blah, lava, father,
bother, lot, top
/ɒ/
/ɔː/ [ɑɒ̯~ɑ] (older: [ɔo̯~ɑɒ̯])off, loss, dog,
all, bought, saw
/ə/ [ə]about, syrup, arena
/ɛ/ [ɛ~ɛjə̯]dress, met, bread
[ɪ~ɪjə̯~iə̯] [a] pen, gem, tent,
pin, hit, tip
/ɪ/
// [i̞i̯~ɪi̯]beam, chic, fleet
/ʌ/ [ɜ]bus, flood, what
/ʊ/ [ʊ̈~ʏ]book, put, should
// [ʊu̯~ʉ̞u̯~ɵu̯~ʊ̈y̯~ʏy̯]food, glue, new
Diphthongs
// [aː~aɛ̯]ride, shine, try
([aɛ̯~aɪ̯~ɐi̯]) bright, dice, psych
// [æɒ̯~ɛjɔ̯]now, ouch, scout
// [ɛi̯~æ̠i̯]lake, paid, rein
/ɔɪ/ [oi̯]boy, choice, moist
// [əʊ̯~əʊ̯̈~əʏ̯]goat, road, most
[ɔu̯] [b] goal, bold, showing
R-colored vowels
/ɑːr/ rhotic Southern dialects: [ɒɹ~ɑɹ]
non-rhotic Southern dialects: [ɒ~ɑ]
barn, car, park
/ɛər/ rhotic: [eɹ~ɛ(j)əɹ]
non-rhotic: [ɛ(j)ə̯]
bare, bear, there
/ɜːr/ [ɚ~ɐɹ] (older: [ɜ])burn, first, herd
/ər/ rhotic: [ɚ]
non-rhotic: [ə]
better, martyr, doctor
/ɪər/ rhotic: [i(j)əɹ]
non-rhotic: [iə̯]
fear, peer, tier
/ɔːr/ rhotic: [ɔɹ~o(u̯)ɹ]
non-rhotic: [ɔə̯]
horse, born, north
rhotic: [o(u̯)ɹ]
non-rhotic: [o(u̯)ə̯]
hoarse, force, pork
/ʊər/ rhotic: [uɹ~əɹ]
non-rhotic: [uə̯]
poor, sure, tour
/jʊər/ rhotic: [juɹ~jɚ]
non-rhotic: [juə̯]
cure, Europe, pure

Consonant features

Lexical stress distinctions

Many nouns are stressed on the first syllable that are stressed on the second syllable in most other accents of English, [13] such as police, cement, Detroit, Thanksgiving, insurance, behind, display, hotel, motel, recycle, TV, guitar, July, and umbrella. Today, younger Southerners tend to keep this initial stress only for a more reduced set of words, perhaps including only insurance, defense, Thanksgiving, and umbrella. [36] [25]

Distinct modern phonologies

Inland South and Texas

Linguist William Labov et al. identify the "Inland South" as a large linguistic sub-region of the South located mostly in southern Appalachia: specifically the cities of Greenville, South Carolina; Asheville, North Carolina; Knoxville and Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Birmingham and Linden, Alabama. The Inland South, inland from both the Gulf and Atlantic Coasts, is the originating region of the Southern Vowel Shift. [37] The Inland South, along with the "Texas South" (an urban core of central Texas: Dallas, Lubbock, Odessa, and San Antonio) [38] are considered the two major locations in which the Southern regional sound system is the most highly developed: the most advanced areas of the current-day South as a distinct dialect region.

The accents of Texas are diverse; however, much of the state is still an unambiguous region of modern rhotic Southern speech, strongest in the cities of Dallas, Lubbock, Odessa, and San Antonio, [38] which all firmly demonstrate the first stage of the Southern Shift, if not also further stages of the shift. [39] Texan cities with distinctly "non-Southern" accents are also documented, such as Abilene and Austin; only marginally Southern are Houston, El Paso, and Corpus Christi. [38] In western and northern Texas, the cot–caught merger is very close to completed, unlike the traditional Southern core region. [15]

Acadiana (Cajun)

Most of southern Louisiana constitutes Acadiana, a cultural region dominated for hundreds of years by monolingual speakers of Cajun French, [40] which combines elements of Acadian French with other French and Spanish words. Today, this French dialect is spoken by many older Cajun ethnic group members and is said to be dying out. A related language, Louisiana Creole French, also exists. Since the early 1900s, Cajuns additionally began to develop their vernacular dialect of English, which retains some influences and words from French, such as "cher" (dear) or "nonc" (uncle). This dialect fell out of fashion after World War II but experienced a renewal among primarily male speakers born since the 1970s, who have been the most attracted by, and the biggest attractors of, a successful Cajun cultural renaissance. [40] The accent includes: [41]

Cajun English is not subject to the Southern Vowel Shift. [42]

New Orleans

A separate historical English dialect from the above Cajun one, spoken only by those raised in the Greater New Orleans area, is traditionally non-rhotic and noticeably shares more pronunciation commonalities with a New York accent than with other Southern accents, due to commercial ties and cultural migration between the two cities. Since at least the 1980s, this local New Orleans dialect has popularly been called "Yat", from the common local greeting "Where you at?". Some features that the New York accent shares with the Yat accent include: [43]

Yat also lacks the typical vowel changes of the Southern Shift and the pin–pen merger that is commonly heard elsewhere throughout the South. Yat is associated with the working and lower-middle classes, and a spectrum of speech patterns with fewer notable Yat features is often heard among those of higher socioeconomic status; such New Orleans affluence is associated with the New Orleans Uptown and the Garden District, whose speech patterns are sometimes considered distinct from the lower-class Yat dialect. [45]

Other Southern cities

Some sub-regions of the South, and perhaps even a majority of the biggest cities, are showing a gradual shift away from the Southern accent (toward a more Midland or General American accent) since the second half of the 20th century to the present. Such well-studied cities include Houston, Texas, and Raleigh, North Carolina; in Raleigh, for example, this retreat from the accent appears to have begun around 1950. [46]

Other sub-regions are unique in that their inhabitants have never spoken with the Southern regional accent, instead having their own distinct accents. The 2006 Atlas of North American English identifies Atlanta, Georgia, as a dialectal "island of non-Southern speech", [47] Charleston, South Carolina, likewise as "not markedly Southern in character", and the traditional local accent of Savannah, Georgia, as "giving way to regional [Midland] patterns", [48] despite these being three prominent Southern cities. The dialect features of Atlanta are best described today as sporadic from speaker to speaker, with such variation increased due to a huge movement of non-Southerners into the area during the 1990s. [43] Modern-day Charleston speakers have leveled in the direction of a more generalized Midland accent (and speakers in other Southern cities too like Greenville, Richmond, and Norfolk), [49] away from the city's now-defunct, traditional Charleston accent, whose features were "diametrically opposed to the Southern Shift... and differ in many other respects from the main body of Southern dialects". [50] The Savannah accent is also becoming more Midland-like. The following vowel sounds of Atlanta, Charleston, and Savannah have been unaffected by typical Southern phenomena like the Southern drawl and Southern Vowel Shift: [43]

Today, the accents of Atlanta, Charleston, and Savannah are most similar to the Midland regional accent or at least the larger Southeastern super-regional accent. [43] [52] In all three cities, some speakers (though most consistently documented in Charleston and least consistently in Savannah) demonstrate the Southeastern fronting of /oʊ/ and the status of the pin–pen merger is highly variable. [52] Non-rhoticity (r-dropping) is now rare in these cities, yet still documented in some speakers. [53]

Older phonologies

Before becoming a phonologically unified dialect region, the South was once home to an array of much more diverse accents at the local level. Features of the deeper interior Appalachian South largely became the basis for the newer Southern regional dialect; thus, older Southern American English primarily refers to the English spoken outside of Appalachia: the coastal and former plantation areas of the South, best documented before the Civil War, on the decline during the early 1900s, and non-existent in speakers born since the civil rights movement. [54]

Little unified these older Southern dialects since they never formed a single homogeneous dialect region to begin with. Some older Southern accents were rhotic (most strongly in Appalachia and west of the Mississippi), while the majority were non-rhotic (most strongly in plantation areas); however, wide variation existed. Some older Southern accents showed (or approximated) Stage 1 of the Southern Vowel Shiftnamely, the glide weakening of /aɪ/however, it is virtually unreported before the very late 1800s. [55] In general, the older Southern dialects lacked the Mary–marry–merry, cot–caught, horse–hoarse, wine–whine, full–fool, fill–feel, and do–dew mergers, all of which are now common to, or encroaching on, all varieties of present-day Southern American English. Older Southern sound systems included those local to the: [56]

Notes

  1. /ɛ/ and /ɪ/ are merged before nasal consanants due to the pin–pen merger.
  2. preceding /l/ or a hiatus

References

Citations

  1. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 131.
  2. "Southern". Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, Inc. 2014. [See under the "noun" heading.]
  3. Thomas (2007), p. 453.
  4. Nagle, Stephen; Sander, Sara (2003). English in the Southern United States. Cambridge University Press, p. 3.
  5. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 241.
  6. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 242–254.
  7. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 244.
  8. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 245.
  9. Thomas (2004), pp. 301, 311–312.
  10. Tillery & Bailey (2004), p. 332.
  11. Thomas, Erik R. (2003). "Secrets Revealed by Southern Vowel Shifting". American Speech, Vol. 78, No. 2, Summer 2003. American Dialect Society.
  12. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 121.
  13. 1 2 3 Thomas (2004), p. 305.
  14. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 248.
  15. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 254.
  16. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 137.
  17. Thomas (2004), p. 309.
  18. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 61.
  19. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006 :68)
  20. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 69–73.
  21. Thomas (2004), p. 310.
  22. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 105.
  23. Wells (1982), p. 167.
  24. Thomas (2004), p. 307.
  25. 1 2 Vaux, Bert and Scott Golder. 2003. The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.
  26. Wells (1982), p. 165.
  27. Wolfram (2003), p. 151.
  28. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 52.
  29. Thomas (2004), pp. 301–2.
  30. Heggarty, Paul; et al., eds. (2013). "Accents of English from Around the World". University of Edinburgh.
  31. Hayes (2013), p. 63.
  32. Thomas (2004), p. 315.
  33. Thomas (2004), p. 316.
  34. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 50.
  35. Wolfram (2003), p. 55.
  36. Tillery & Bailey (2004), p. 331.
  37. According to Labov et al. (2006), p. 262: "all three stages of the Southern Shift are disfavored by city size[....] We are therefore studying the widespread distribution of a phonological pattern that originated in rural settlements of the Irish and Scots-Irish migrants. In fact, Jordan-Bychkov defines the Upland South as that contiguous region in which persons of German, French, Spanish, or African ancestry do NOT constitute majorities or pluralities. [...] The maps in this chapter document the fact that this originally poor and rural population is the originating center of the widespread Southern Shift, which has expanded to influence all but the marginal coastal areas of the South."
  38. 1 2 3 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 126, 131.
  39. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 69.
  40. 1 2 Dubois & Horvath (2004), pp. 412–414.
  41. Dubois & Horvath (2004), pp. 409–410.
  42. Reaser et al. 2018, p. 135.
  43. 1 2 3 4 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 260–1.
  44. Carmichael, Katie (January 2020). "The Rise of Canadian Raising of /au/ in New Orleans English". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147 (1): 554. Bibcode:2020ASAJ..147..554C. doi:10.1121/10.0000553. hdl: 10919/113171 . PMID   32006992 . Retrieved 2023-04-26.
  45. Alvarez, Louis (director) (1985). Yeah You Rite! (Short documentary film). USA: Center for New American Media.
  46. Dodsworth, Robin (2013) "Retreat from the Southern Vowel Shift in Raleigh, NC: Social Factors", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 19: Iss. 2, Article 5.
  47. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 181.
  48. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 304.
  49. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 135.
  50. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 259–260.
  51. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 259–261.
  52. 1 2 Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 68.
  53. Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 48.
  54. Thomas (2004), p. 304.
  55. Thomas (2004), p. 306.
  56. Thomas (2004), p. ?.

Bibliography