Non-native pronunciations of English

Last updated

This gift shop in Japan spells the English word "decoration" as decolation, as a result of the well-attested difficulty of Japanese speakers in distinguishing English <l>  and <r>  sounds. Japanese mistake in English caused by perceptions of R and L sounds at gift shop in Otaru.jpg
This gift shop in Japan spells the English word "decoration" as decolation, as a result of the well-attested difficulty of Japanese speakers in distinguishing English l and r sounds.

Non-native pronunciations of English result from the common linguistic phenomenon in which non-native speakers of any language tend to transfer the intonation, phonological processes and pronunciation rules of their first language into their English speech. They may also create innovative pronunciations not found in the speaker's native language.

Contents

Overview

Non-native English speakers may pronounce words differently than native speakers either because they apply the speech rules of their mother tongue to English ("interference") or through implementing strategies similar to those used in first language acquisition. [1] They may also create innovative pronunciations for English sounds not found in the speaker's first language. [1]

The extent to which native speakers can identify a non-native accent is linked to the age at which individuals begin to immerse themselves in a language. Scholars disagree on the precise nature of this link, which might be influenced by a combination of factors, including: neurological plasticity, cognitive development, motivation, psychosocial states, formal instruction, language learning aptitude, and the usage of their first (L1) and second (L2) languages. [2]

English is unusual in that speakers rarely produce an audible release between consonant clusters and often overlap constriction times. Speaking English with a timing pattern that is dramatically different may lead to speech that is difficult to understand. [3]

Phonological differences between a speaker's native language and English often lead to neutralization of distinctions in their English. [4] Moreover, differences in sound inventory or distribution can result in difficult English sounds being substituted or dropped entirely. [5] This is more common when the distinction is subtle between English sounds or between a sound of English and of a speaker's native language. While there is no evidence to suggest that a simple absence of a sound or sequence in one language's phonological inventory makes it difficult to learn, [6] several theoretical models have presumed that non-native speech perceptions reflect both the abstract phonological properties and phonetic details of the native language. [7]

Non-native speech patterns can be passed on to the children of learners, who will then exhibit some of the same characteristics despite being native speakers themselves. [8] For example, this process has resulted in many of the distinctive qualities of Irish English and Highland English which were heavily influenced by a Goidelic substratum. [9]

Examples

Arabic

General features among most or all Arabic speakers:

Catalan

E.g. phase can be pronounced like face (even though Catalan has both /s/ and /z/ phonemes). [16]
E.g. stop being pronounced estop. [17]
E.g. instant being pronounced instan [17]
E.g. the blackbird vs. the black bird. [15]
E.g. with sugar or without sugar? (the second sugar is more heavily stressed) [15]

Cantonese

Czech

These are the most common characteristics of the Czech pronunciation of English: [22]

Dutch

These are some of the most notable features a Dutch speaker might have:

Pronunciation of consonants
Pronunciation of vowels

French

German

Greek

Hebrew

Hungarian

Indonesian

The following are some characteristics of the English pronunciation by Indonesian speakers: [49]

Italian

Studies on Italian speakers' pronunciation of English revealed the following characteristics: [51] [52]

In addition, Italians learning English have a tendency to pronounce words as they are spelled, so that walk is [walk], guide is [ɡwid̪], and boiled is [ˈbɔilɛd]. This is also true for loanwords borrowed from English as water (water closet), which is pronounced [ˈvat̪ɛr] instead of [ˈwɔːtə(r)].

Japanese

Portuguese

Brazilian speakers of English as a second language are likely to exhibit several non-standard pronunciation features, including: [55]

Pronunciation of vowels
Pronunciation of consonants

Russian

Spanish

An excerpt of J.D. Salinger's ''The Catcher in the Rye'' as read in English by a person whose mother tongue is Spanish
E.g. the blackbird. vs. the black bird. [15]
E.g. with sugar or without sugar?
(the second sugar is more heavily stressed) [15]

Vietnamese

Note: There are three main dialects of Vietnamese, a northern one centered on Hanoi, a central one centered on Huế, and a southern one centered on Ho Chi Minh City.

See also

Related Research Articles

Modern Hebrew has 25 to 27 consonants and 5 vowels, depending on the speaker and the analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digraph (orthography)</span> Pair of characters used to write one phoneme

A digraph or digram is a pair of characters used in the orthography of a language to write either a single phoneme, or a sequence of phonemes that does not correspond to the normal values of the two characters combined.

The phonology of Standard German is the standard pronunciation or accent of the German language. It deals with current phonology and phonetics as well as with historical developments thereof as well as the geographical variants and the influence of German dialects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tinglish</span> English dialect used by Thai people

Tinglish refers to any form of English mixed with or heavily influenced by Thai. It is typically produced by native Thai speakers due to language interference from the first language. Differences from standard native English occur in pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar. The term was coined in 1970, and several alternative terms have been proposed since its inception, such as Thainglish (1973), Thaiglish (1992), Tinglish (1994), Thinglish (1976), Thenglish (2003), and Tenglish (2012).

While many languages have numerous dialects that differ in phonology, contemporary spoken Arabic is more properly described as a continuum of varieties. This article deals primarily with Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), which is the standard variety shared by educated speakers throughout Arabic-speaking regions. MSA is used in writing in formal print media and orally in newscasts, speeches and formal declarations of numerous types.

English phonology is the system of speech sounds used in spoken English. Like many other languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect. In general, however, the regional dialects of English share a largely similar phonological system. Among other things, most dialects have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables and a complex set of phonological features that distinguish fortis and lenis consonants.

In English, the digraph ⟨th⟩ usually represents either the voiced dental fricative phoneme or the voiceless dental fricative phoneme. Occasionally, it stands for. In the word eighth, it is often pronounced. In compound words, ⟨th⟩ may be a consonant sequence rather than a digraph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ch (digraph)</span> Latin-script digraph

Ch is a digraph in the Latin script. It is treated as a letter of its own in the Chamorro, Old Spanish, Czech, Slovak, Igbo, Uzbek, Quechua, Ladino, Guarani, Welsh, Cornish, Breton, Ukrainian, Japanese, Latynka, and Belarusian Łacinka alphabets. Formerly ch was also considered a separate letter for collation purposes in Modern Spanish, Vietnamese, and sometimes in Polish; now the digraph ch in these languages continues to be used, but it is considered as a sequence of letters and sorted as such.

Old English phonology is the pronunciation system of Old English, the Germanic language spoken on Great Britain from around 450 to 1150 and attested in a body of written texts from the 7th–12th centuries. Although its reconstruction is necessarily somewhat speculative, features of Old English pronunciation have been inferred partly from the sounds used in modern varieties of English, partly from the spellings used in Old English literature, partly from analysis of Old English poetry, and partly from comparison with other Germanic languages.

This article describes those aspects of the phonological history of English which concern consonants.

The following is a list of common non-native pronunciations that English speakers make when trying to speak foreign languages. Many of these are due to transfer of phonological rules from English to the new language as well as differences in grammar and syntax that they encounter.

A hyperforeignism is a type of hypercorrection where speakers identify an inaccurate pattern in loanwords from a foreign language and then apply that pattern to other loanwords. This results in a pronunciation of those loanwords which does not reflect the rules of either language. For example, the ⟨n⟩ in habanero is pronounced as in Spanish, but English speakers often pronounce it as. The proposed explanation is that English speakers are familiar with other Spanish loanwords like piñata and jalapeño, and incorrectly assume that all Spanish words have in place of.

The phonology of Bengali, like that of its neighbouring Eastern Indo-Aryan languages, is characterised by a wide variety of diphthongs and inherent back vowels.

The phonology of Welsh is characterised by a number of sounds that do not occur in English and are rare in European languages, such as the voiceless alveolar lateral fricative and several voiceless sonorants, some of which result from consonant mutation. Stress usually falls on the penultimate syllable in polysyllabic words, while the word-final unstressed syllable receives a higher pitch than the stressed syllable.

The phonology of Burmese is fairly typical of a Southeast Asian language, involving phonemic tone or register, a contrast between major and minor syllables, and strict limitations on consonant clusters.

One aspect of the differences between American and British English is that of specific word pronunciations, as described in American and British English pronunciation differences. However, there are also differences in some of the basic pronunciation patterns between the standard dialects of each country. The standard varieties for each are in fact generalizations: for the U.S., a loosely defined spectrum of unmarked varieties called General American and, for Britain, a collection of prestigious varieties most common in southeastern England, ranging from upper- to middle-class Received Pronunciation accents, which together here are abbreviated "RP". However, other regional accents in each country also show differences, for which see regional accents of English speakers.

This article explains the phonology of Malay and Indonesian based on the pronunciation of Standard Malay, which is the official language of Brunei and Singapore, "Malaysian" of Malaysia, and Indonesian the official language of Indonesia and a working language in Timor Leste. There are two main standards for Malay pronunciation, the Johor-Riau standard, used in Brunei and Malaysia, and the Baku, used in Indonesia and Singapore.

This article aims to describe the phonology and phonetics of central Luxembourgish, which is regarded as the emerging standard.

The Glenoe dialect is an Ulster Scots dialect spoken in the Glenoe district in East Antrim, Northern Ireland.

References

  1. 1 2 MacDonald (1989 :224)
  2. Munro & Mann (2005 :311)
  3. Zsiga (2003 :400–401)
  4. 1 2 Jeffers & Lehiste (1979 :140)
  5. 1 2 3 Goldstein, Fabiano & Washington (2005 :203)
  6. MacDonald (1989 :223)
  7. See the overview at Hallé, Best & Levitt (1999 :283)
  8. MacDonald (1989 :215)
  9. McEwan-Fujita, Emily. "Gaelic and English". Experience an Emerald Adventure.
  10. 1 2 Al Saqqaf & Vaddapalli (2012), p. 48.
  11. Hago & Khan (2015)
  12. Khattab (2002 :101)
  13. Alshalaan, Khawater (May 2020). "A Comparison between English and Arabic Sound Systems Regarding Places of Articulation". A Comparison between English and Arabic Sound Systems Regarding Places of Articulation.
  14. Khalifa, Mohamed (2020). Errors in English Pronunciation among Arabic Speakers. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. Abstract.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Swan 2001, p. 91.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Swan 2001, p. 93.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Swan 2001, p. 94.
  18. 1 2 Swan 2001, pp. 91, 96.
  19. Sewell, Andrew (2009). "World Englishes, English as a Lingua Franca, and the case of Hong Kong English". English Today. 25 (1): 37–43. doi:10.1017/S0266078409000066. S2CID   54170922.
  20. Deterding, D., Wong J., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). The pronunciation of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide, 29, 148–149.
  21. Sewell, Andrew (2017). "Pronunciation Assessment in Asia's World City: Implications of a Lingua Franca Approach in Hong Kong". In Isaacs T.; Trofimovich P. (eds.). Second Language Pronunciation Assessment: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Vol. 107. Bristol: Multilingual Matters / Channel View Publications. pp. 237–255. ISBN   9781783096848. JSTOR   10.21832/j.ctt1xp3wcc.17.
  22. Melen (2010 :71–75)
  23. Collins & Mees 2003, p. 11, 286.
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 Collins & Mees 2003, p. 286.
  25. Collins & Mees 2003, p. 285–286.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Collins & Mees 2003, p. 285.
  27. Collins & Mees 2003, p. 285-286.
  28. 1 2 Collins & Mees 2003, p. 287.
  29. Collins & Mees 2003, p. 10, 288.
  30. Collins & Mees 2003, p. 10.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Collins & Mees 2003, p. 289.
  32. 1 2 Collins & Mees 2003, p. 288.
  33. Collins & Mees 2003, p. ?.
  34. Hallé, Best & Levitt (1999 :294)
  35. Paradis & LaCharité (2001 :257), citing LaCharité & Prévost (1999)
  36. 1 2 "French Speakers' English Pronunciation Errors". 2013-12-06.
  37. Paradis & LaCharité 2012.
  38. Gut (2009)
  39. 1 2 3 4 "10 English Pronunciation Errors by German Speakers - Pronunciation Studio". pronunciationstudio.com. 2016-04-04. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  40. 1 2 Hickey, Raymond (October 2014). "German pronunciations of English" (PDF). University of Duisburg-Essen.
  41. Shoebottom, Paul. "Language differences: English - German". esl.fis.edu. Archived from the original on 2017-05-15. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  42. 1 2 3 4 5 Cheung (2015).
  43. Georgiou, Georgios P. (2019-03-01). "Bit and beat are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children". Language Sciences. 72: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.001. ISSN   0388-0001. S2CID   150229377.
  44. 1 2 3 4 5 Shoebottom (2007)
  45. Nádasdy (2006)
  46. Kovács & Siptár (2006 :?)
  47. Michael., Vago, Robert (1980). The sound pattern of Hungarian. Georgetown University Press. ISBN   0-87840-177-6. OCLC   1171902116.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  48. "CUBE: dropped". seas3.elte.hu. Retrieved 2022-10-08.
  49. Tambunsaribu, Gunawan; Simatupang, Masda Surti (2021). "Pronunciation Problems Faced by Indonesian College Students Who Learn to Speak English" (PDF). European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. 08 (02).
  50. Ikhwanur, Asyahra; Khabibah, Isma; Saputra, Veamas Wahyu (2022). "ERRORS IN ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION MADE BY STUDENTS OF ESA UNGGUL UNIVERSITY".
  51. Martin Russell, Analysis of Italian children's English pronunciation Archived 2007-05-27 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed 2007-07-12.
  52. 1 2 3 4 "Italian Speakers' English Pronunciation Errors". 22 November 2013.
  53. Goto (1971 :?)
  54. Hallé, Best & Levitt (1999 :284)
  55. "Pronunciation problems for Brazilian students of English". Archived from the original on 2009-10-15. Retrieved 2009-10-15.
  56. Palatalization in Brazilian Portuguese/English interphonology
  57. Preceding phonological context effects on palatalization in Brazilian Portuguese/English interphonology Page 68.
  58. Thompson (1991)
  59. Zsiga (2003 :400–401, 423)
  60. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "LanguageLink TEFL clinic - Pronunciation".
  61. Sukmawijaya, Jeri, Sutiono Mahdi, and Susi Yuliawati (2020). "AN ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF VOICELESS ALVEOLAR PLOSIVE/t/IN SUNDANESE, INDONESIAN, AND ENGLISH BY SUNDANESE SPEAKERS." Metahumaniora 10.1: 1-13.
  62. 1 2 "О характерных ошибках в произношении при изучении английского языка". 2017-10-20.
  63. 1 2 3 "Как исправить или улучшить свое произношение?".
  64. 1 2 3 4 5 6 MacDonald (1989 :219)
  65. Jeffers & Lehiste (1979 :139)
  66. Hwa-Froelich, Hodson & Edwards (2003 :269)
  67. 1 2 Hwa-Froelich, Hodson & Edwards (2003 :267)
  68. 1 2 Hwa-Froelich, Hodson & Edwards (2003 :271)
  69. Hwa-Froelich, Hodson & Edwards (2003 :265)

Bibliography

Further reading