| | |
| Clinical data | |
|---|---|
| Other names | MPDA; 3-Methoxy-4,5-trimethylenedioxyamphetamine; 5-Methoxy-3,4-trimethylenedioxyamphetamine; 5-Methoxy-TDA; 5-MeO-TDA |
| ATC code |
|
| Identifiers | |
| |
| PubChem CID | |
| Chemical and physical data | |
| Formula | C13H19NO3 |
| Molar mass | 237.299 g·mol−1 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | |
| |
| |
MTDA, or MPDA, also known as 3-methoxy-4,5-trimethylenedioxyamphetamine or as 5-methoxy-TDA, is a chemical compound of the phenethylamine and amphetamine families related to the MDxx compounds like MDMA and the EDxx compounds like EDMA. [1] [2] [3] It is the 5-methoxy derivative of 3,4-trimethylenedioxyamphetamine (TDA) and the analogue of MMDA (5-methoxy-MDA) and MEDA (5-methoxy-EDA) in which the 3,4-alkylenedioxy ring is a further-expanded 3,4-trimethylenedioxy ring. [1] [2] [3] It was synthesized, tested, and described by Alexander Shulgin in his 1991 book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved). [1] [2] [3] He tested it at doses of up to 8 mg orally and observed no activity. [1] [2] [3] He did not expect any activity and did not test higher doses before abandoning it, due to it being "not an interesting compound". [1] [2] [3] MTDA was first described in the scientific literature by Shulgin by 1964. [4] [5]
With the specific compound MDMA, I have made only one modification of the methylenedioxy ring. This was to make it into a six membered ring, a dioxane homologue, which I called EDMA for ethylenedioxymethamphetmaine. With this homologue, I went up to twice the active dosage of MDMA and experienced none of the effects that might have been expected. A completely separate ring expansion to the dioxane homologue was explored with MMDA. The 5-membered methylenedioxy ring was expanded to the six-membered dioxane (3-methoxy-4,5-ethylenedioxyamphetamine, MEDA) which was also inactive at a 200 milligram dose. The chemistry was pursued successful up to the seven member ring, the compound named MTDA for 3-methoxy-4,5- trimethylenedioxyamphetamine was also synthesized, but human trials didn't go up very far. It was not an interesting compound (see PIHKAL, page 761).