Queue (hairstyle)

Last updated

ᠰᠣᠨᠴᠣᡥᠣ Soncoho.png
Chinese circus performers soon after the Manchu conquest, wearing queues. (Drawing by Johan Nieuhof, 1655-57) Nieuhof-p-263-Googhelaars-Lach-van-Kley-plate-364.png
Chinese circus performers soon after the Manchu conquest, wearing queues. (Drawing by Johan Nieuhof, 1655–57)

The Queue Order (simplified Chinese :剃发令; traditional Chinese :剃髮令; pinyin :tìfàlìng), [35] [36] or tonsure decree, was a series of laws violently imposed by the Qing dynasty during the seventeenth century. It was also imposed on Taiwanese indigenous peoples in 1753, [37] [38] and Koreans who settled in northeast China in the late 19th century, [39] [40] though the Ryukyuan people of the Ryukyu Kingdom, a tributary of China, requested and were granted an exemption from the mandate.

Traditionally, adult Han Chinese did not cut their hair for philosophical and cultural reasons. According to the Classic of Filial Piety, Confucius said:

We are given our body, skin and hair from our parents; which we ought not to damage. This idea is the quintessence of filial duty. (身體髮膚,受之父母,不敢毀傷,孝之始也。) [41]

As a result of this ideology, both men and women wound their hair into a bun (a topknot) or other various hairstyles.

Han Chinese did not object to wearing the queue braid on the back of the head as they traditionally wore all their hair long, but fiercely objected to shaving the forehead so the Qing government exclusively focused on forcing people to shave the forehead rather than wear the braid. Han rebels in the first half of the Qing who objected to Qing hairstyle wore the braid but defied orders to shave the front of the head. One person was executed for refusing to shave the front but he had willingly braided the back of his hair. It was only later that westernized revolutionaries began to view the braid as backwards and advocated adopting short-haired western styles. [42] Han rebels against the Qing like the Taiping retained their queue braids on the back but rebelled by growing hair on the front of their heads. This caused the Qing government to view shaving the front of the head as the primary sign of loyalty rather than wearing the braid on the back, which did not violate Han customs and traditional Han did not object to. [43] Koxinga criticized the Qing hairstyle by referring to the shaven pate looking like a fly. [44] Koxinga and his men objected to shaving when the Qing demanded they shave in exchange for recognizing Koxinga as a feudatory. [45] The Qing demanded that Zheng Jing and his men on Taiwan shave to receive recognition as a fiefdom. His men and Ming prince Zhu Shugui fiercely objected to shaving. [46]

A soldier during the Boxer Rebellion with queue and conical Asian hat Boxer queue.JPG
A soldier during the Boxer Rebellion with queue and conical Asian hat

In 1644, Beijing was sacked by a coalition of rebel forces led by Li Zicheng, a minor Ming dynasty official turned leader of a peasant revolt. The Chongzhen Emperor committed suicide when the city fell, marking the official end of the Ming dynasty. The Han Chinese Ming general Wu Sangui and his army then defected to the Qing and allowed them through Shanhai pass. They then seized control of Beijing, overthrowing Li's short-lived Shun dynasty. They then forced Han Chinese to adopt the queue as a sign of submission. [47]

A year later, after the Qing armies reached South China, on 21 July 1645, the regent Dorgon issued an edict ordering all Han men to shave their foreheads and braid the rest of their hair into a queue identical to those worn by the Manchus. [48] Qing Manchu prince Dorgon initially canceled the order for all men in Ming territories south of the Great wall (post 1644 additions to the Qing) to shave. It was a Han official from Shandong, Sun Zhixie and Li Ruolin who voluntarily shaved their foreheads and demanded Qing Prince Dorgon impose the queue hairstyle on the entire population which led to the queue order. [49] [50] The Han Chinese were given 10 days to comply or face death. Though Dorgon admitted that followers of Confucianism might have grounds for objection, most Han officials cited the Ming dynasty's traditional System of Rites and Music as their reason for resistance. This led Dorgon to question their motives: "If officials say that people should not respect our Rites and Music, but rather follow those of the Ming, what can be their true intentions?" [47]

In the edict, Dorgon specifically emphasized the fact that Manchus and the Qing Emperor himself all wore the queue and shaved their foreheads, so that by following the queue order, Han Chinese would look like the Manchus and the Emperor. This invoked the Confucian notion that the people were like the sons of the emperor, and should be similar in their appearance. [51] [52] [53]

The slogan adopted by the Qing was "Cut the hair and keep the head, (or) keep the hair and cut the head" (Chinese :留髮不留頭,留頭不留髮; pinyin :liú fà bù liú tóu, liú tóu bù liú fà). [54] People who resisted the order were met with deadly force. Han rebels in Shandong tortured the Qing official who suggested the queue order to Dorgon to death and killed his relatives. [55]

The imposition of this order was not uniform; it took up to 10 years of martial enforcement for all of China to be brought into compliance, and while it was the Qing who imposed the queue hairstyle on the general population, they did not always personally execute those who did not obey. It was Han Chinese defectors who carried out massacres against people refusing to wear the queue. Li Chengdong, a Han Chinese general who had served the Ming but defected to the Qing, [56] ordered troops to carry out three separate massacres in the city of Jiading within a month, resulting in tens of thousands of deaths. The third massacre left few survivors. [57] The three massacres at Jiading District are some of the most infamous, with estimated death tolls in the tens or even hundreds of thousands. [58] Jiangyin also held out against about 10,000 Qing troops for 83 days. When the city wall was finally breached on 9 October 1645, the Qing army, led by the Han Chinese Ming defector Liu Liangzuo (劉良佐), who had been ordered to "fill the city with corpses before you sheathe your swords," massacred the entire population, killing between 74,000 and 100,000 people. [59]

Han Chinese soldiers in 1645 under Han General Hong Chengchou forced the queue on the people of Jiangnan, while Han people were initially paid silver to wear the queue in Fuzhou when it was first implemented. [60] [61]

The queue was the only aspect of Manchu culture that the Qing forced on the common Han population. The Qing required people serving as officials to wear Manchu clothing, but allowed other Han civilians to continue wearing Hanfu (Han clothing). Nevertheless, most Han civilian men voluntarily adopted Manchu clothing [62] [63] like Changshan of their own free will. Throughout the Qing dynasty Han women continued to wear Han clothing. [64]

However, the shaving policy was not enforced in the Tusi autonomous chiefdoms in Southwestern China where many minorities lived. There was one Han Chinese Tusi, the Chiefdom of Kokang populated by Han Kokang people.

The Qing dynasty required all subjects of all ethnicities to shave their foreheads and wear the queue braid including Muslims like Hui people and Salar people but some Turkic Muslim ethnicities like Uyghur and Salar people already shaved their entire heads as part of their culture and were bald so they were not able to wear the braids on the back unless they wore wigs with fake queues. According to Jonathan Neaman Lipman the Qing dynasty required Salars to wear the queue. [65] [66] [67] During the Qing Salar men shaved their hair bald while when they went to journey in public they put on artificial queues. [68] Uyghur men shaved their hair bald during the Qing. [69] Uyghur males at the present still shave their heads bald in the summer. [70] Chen Cheng observed that Muslim Turks in 14th–15th century Turfan and Kumul shaved their heads while non-Muslim Turks grew long hair. [71] [72]

However, after Jahangir Khoja invaded Kashgar, Turkistani Muslim begs and officials in Xinjiang eagerly fought for the "privilege" of wearing a queue to show their steadfast loyalty to the Empire. High-ranking begs were granted this right. [73]

The purpose of the Queue Order was to demonstrate loyalty to the Qing, and refusing to shave one's hair came to symbolize revolutionary ideals, as seen during the White Lotus Rebellion. Because of this, the members of the Taiping Rebellion were sometimes called the Long hairs (長毛) or Hair rebels (髮逆). [74]

Resistance to the queue

Han Chinese resistance to adopting the queue was widespread and bloody. The Chinese in the Liaodong Peninsula rebelled in 1622 and 1625 in response to the implementation of the mandatory hairstyle. The Manchus responded swiftly by killing the educated elite and instituting a stricter separation between Han Chinese and Manchus. [75]

In 1645, the enforcement of the queue order was taken a step further by the ruling Manchus when it was decreed that any man who did not adopt the Manchu hairstyle within ten days would be executed. The intellectual Lu Xun summed up the Chinese reaction to the implementation of the mandatory Manchu hairstyle by stating, "In fact, the Chinese people in those days revolted not because the country was on the verge of ruin, but because they had to wear queues." In 1683 Zheng Keshuang surrendered and wore a queue. [75]

The queue became a symbol of the Qing dynasty and a custom except among Buddhist monastics. [76] [77] [78] Some revolutionists, supporters of the Hundred Days' Reform or students who studied abroad cut their braids. The Xinhai Revolution in 1911 led to a complete change in hairstyle almost overnight. The queue became unpopular as it became associated with a fallen government; this is depicted in Lu Xun's short story Storm in a Teacup and is demonstrated by the fact that Chinese citizens in Hong Kong collectively changed to short haircuts. [79]

Cantonese outlaw bandit pirates in the Guangdong maritime frontier with Vietnam in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries wore their hair long in defiance of the Qing laws which mandated cutting. [80]

Many people were violating the Qing laws on hair at the end of the dynasty. Some Chinese chose to wear the queue but not to shave their crown, while those people who cut the queue off and did not shave were considered revolutionary and others maintained the state-mandated combination of the queue and shaved crown. [81]

Exemptions

Neither Taoist priests nor Buddhist monks were required to wear the queue by the Qing; they continued to wear their traditional hairstyles, completely shaved heads for Buddhist monks, and long hair in the traditional Chinese topknot for Taoist priests. [82] [83] [84]

Foreign reaction

Barbershop in the Qing Dynasty (1870s) Barbar of qing.jpg
Barbershop in the Qing Dynasty (1870s)

The Manchus' willingness to impose the queue and their dress style on the men of China was viewed as an example to emulate by some foreign observers. H. E. M. James, a British civil servant in India, wrote in 1887 that the British ought to act in a similarly decisive way when imposing their will in India. In his view, the British administration should have outlawed practises such as Sati much earlier than 1829, which James ascribed to a British unwillingness to challenge long-held Indian traditions, no matter how detrimental they were to the country. [85]

British author Demetrius Charles Boulger in 1899 proposed that Britain form and head an alliance of "Philo-Chinese Powers" in setting up a new government for China based in Shanghai and Nanking as two capitals along the River Yangtze, to counter the interests of other powers in the region like the Russians due to what he believed was the imminent collapse of the Qing dynasty. The Yangtze valley was controlled by Qing officials such as Liu Kunyi and Zhang Zhidong, who were not under Beijing's influence and whom Boulger believed Britain could work with to stabilize China. He proposed that at Nanjing and Hankou a force of Chinese soldiers trained by the British be deployed and in Hong Kong, Weihaiwei and the Yangtze valley and it would have no allegiance to the Qing, and as such they in his idea would forgo the queue and be made to grow their hair long as a symbolic measure to "increasing the confidence of the Chinese in the advent of a new era". [86] [87] Boulger stated he could not discern from the Chinese he spoke to on whether the queue was invented by Nurhaci to impose on the Chinese as a symbol of loyalty or whether it was an already established Manchu custom as no one seemed to know the origin of it from his or other sinologists' inquiries. [88]

English adventurer Augustus Frederick Lindley wrote that the beardless, youthful long haired Han Chinese rebels from Hunan in the Taiping armies who grew all their hair long while fighting against the Qing dynasty were among the most beautiful men in the world unlike, in his mind, the Han Chinese who wore the queue, with Lindley calling the shaved part "a disfigurement". [89]

Vietnam

After Nguyễn Huệ defeated the Later Lê dynasty, high ranking Lê loyalists and the last Lê emperor Lê Chiêu Thống fled Vietnam for asylum in Qing China. They went to Beijing where Lê Chiêu Thống was appointed a Chinese mandarin of the fourth rank in the Han Yellow Bordered Banner, while lower ranking loyalists were sent to cultivate government land and join the Green Standard Army in Sichuan and Zhejiang. They adopted Qing clothing and adopt the queue hairstyle, effectively becoming naturalized subjects of the Qing dynasty affording them protection against Vietnamese demands for extradition. Some Lê loyalists were also sent to Central Asia in Urumqi. [90] [91] Modern descendants of the Lê monarch can be traced to southern Vietnam and Urumqi, Xinjiang. [92] [93] [94]

Other queues

Curley Bear with queued hair Curley bear.jpg
Curley Bear with queued hair

Native American

The queue is also a Native American hairstyle, as described in the book House Made of Dawn by N. Scott Momaday.

Western

A Spanish soldier wearing a queue (1761) 1761 sargento - Regimento de Saboya.jpg
A Spanish soldier wearing a queue (1761)

In the 18th century, European soldiers styled their traditionally long hair into a queue called the "soldier's queue." The 18th century custom of tying long curly wigs (which normally reached down the back and chest) behind the neck began among soldiers and hunters, as seen as early as 1678 in a depiction of King Louis XIV hunting with his hair tied back. [95] [96] By the 1730s, the queue had spread from the military and became widespread among civilians. [97] A 1697 depiction of a royal guard during the wedding of the Duke of Burgundy shows the sporting of this hairstyle, which came to influence civilian fashions due to the frequent wars France engaged in during Louis' reign.

The queue, either curled or covered with a silk bag (known as a bag wig), gradually replaced the unwieldy big wigs and remained important to men's fashion until the change of dress in the 1790s effected by the French Revolution. [98] For civilian men, the tyewig (a wig tied into a queue) and the bag wig became widespread after the death of Louis XIV; wigs that did not feature a queue such as the bob wig were favoured by those who could not afford a long wig. The type of wig became an indicator of one's rank, occupation and political leanings. [99]

The first western army in which the wearing of a queue by its soldiers was forbidden was the Russian army in the 1780s. Grigory Potemkin, a Russian statesman and favourite of Catherine the Great, abhorred the tight uniforms and uncomfortable powdered wigs tied in a queue worn by soldiers of the Russian Army and instigated a complete revision of both. Along with comfortable, practical, well-fitting uniforms, his reforms introduced neat, natural hairstyles for all, with no wigs, powder and grease, or hair-tying evident. [100]

The French army plaited their wigs into a short queue (the French word for "tail") tied with a ribbon in the back, while the British military used the Ramillies wig, which featured a very long queue tied with two black ribbons, one at the neck and one at the tail end. [101] The French army continued keeping queues until the French Consulate period (1799-1804), when Napoleon Bonaparte and other officers promoted close cropped hair, known as à la Titus . Napoleon himself, initially wearing long hair tied in a queue, changed his hairstyle and cut his hair short while in Egypt in 1798. [102] However, hair policy in the French army was not uniform; some regiments such as the Imperial Guard foot grenadiers stuck to queues long afterwards, while the 2nd Line Infantry kept their queues as late as 1812. Short hair only became mandated at the end of the First Empire with the ordinance of 25 September 1815. [103] Marshal Jean Lannes notably stood out due to his refusal to cut his queue. [104] [105]

British soldiers and sailors during the 18th century also wore their hair in a queue. While not always braided, the hair was pulled back very tight into a single tail, wrapped around a piece of leather and tied down with a ribbon. The hair was often greased and powdered in a fashion similar to powdered wigs, or tarred in the case of sailors. It was said that the soldiers' hair was pulled back so tightly that they had difficulty closing their eyes afterwards. The use of white hair powder in the British Army was discontinued in 1796 and queues were ordered to be cut off four years later. [106] They continued to be worn in the Royal Navy for a while longer, where they were known as "pigtails". Officers wore pigtails until 1805 and other ranks continued to wear them until about 1820. [107]

In the Prussian Army and those of several other states within the Holy Roman Empire, the soldier's queue was mandatory under the reign of Frederick William I of Prussia. An artificial or "patent" queue was issued to recruits whose hair was too short to plait. The style was abolished in the Prussian Army in 1807. [108]

In the United States Army, queues or pigtails had been worn since the Revolutionary War (1775–1783) until 1801. The order to remove all queues was issued on 30 April 1801 by Major General James Wilkinson. The order was highly unpopular with both officers and men, leading to several desertions and threats of resignation. One senior officer, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Butler, was eventually court-martialled in 1803 for failing to cut his hair. [109] In 1817 during a period known as the Era of Good Feelings, president James Monroe, the last U.S. president who was a Revolutionary War veteran, went on a country-wide Great Goodwill Tour. On the tour he donned a Revolutionary War officer's uniform and tied his long, powdered hair in a queue according to the old-fashioned style of the 18th century. [110]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Manchus are a Tungusic East Asian ethnic group native to Manchuria in Northeast Asia. They are an officially recognized ethnic minority in China and the people from whom Manchuria derives its name. The Later Jin (1616–1636) and Qing (1636–1912) dynasties of China were established and ruled by the Manchus, who are descended from the Jurchen people who earlier established the Jin dynasty (1115–1234) in northern China. Manchus form the largest branch of the Tungusic peoples and are distributed throughout China, forming the fourth largest ethnic group in the country. They are found in 31 Chinese provincial regions. Among them, Liaoning has the largest population and Hebei, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Inner Mongolia and Beijing have over 100,000 Manchu residents. About half of the population live in Liaoning and one-fifth in Hebei. There are a number of Manchu autonomous counties in China, such as Xinbin, Xiuyan, Qinglong, Fengning, Yitong, Qingyuan, Weichang, Kuancheng, Benxi, Kuandian, Huanren, Fengcheng, Beizhen and over 300 Manchu towns and townships. Manchus are the largest minority group in China without an autonomous region.

Jurchen is a term used to collectively describe a number of East Asian Tungusic-speaking people. They lived in northeastern China, also known as Manchuria, before the 18th century. The Jurchens were renamed Manchus in 1635 by Hong Taiji. Different Jurchen groups lived as hunter-gatherers, pastoralist semi-nomads, or sedentary agriculturists. Generally lacking a central authority, and having little communication with each other, many Jurchen groups fell under the influence of neighbouring dynasties, their chiefs paying tribute and holding nominal posts as effectively hereditary commanders of border guards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dorgon</span> Prince regent of Qing China (r. 1643–50)

Dorgon 17 November 1612 – 31 December 1650), was a Manchu prince and regent of the early Qing dynasty. Born in the House of Aisin-Gioro as the 14th son of Nurhaci, Dorgon started his career in military campaigns against the Mongols, the Koreans, and the Ming dynasty during the reign of Hong Taiji who succeeded their father.

The Eight Banners were administrative and military divisions under the Later Jin and Qing dynasties of China into which all Manchu households were placed. In war, the Eight Banners functioned as armies, but the banner system was also the basic organizational framework of all of Manchu society. Created in the early 17th century by Nurhaci, the banner armies played an instrumental role in his unification of the fragmented Jurchen people and in the Qing dynasty's conquest of the Ming dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shunzhi Emperor</span> Emperor of China from 1644 to 1661

The Shunzhi Emperor, also known by his temple name Emperor Shizu of Qing, personal name Fulin, was the third emperor of the Qing dynasty, and the first Qing emperor to rule over China proper. Upon the death of his father Hong Taiji, a committee of Manchu princes chose the 5-year-old Fulin as successor. The princes also appointed two co-regents: Dorgon, the 14th son of Nurhaci, and Jirgalang, one of Nurhaci's nephews, both of whom were members of the Qing imperial clan. In November 1644, the Shunzhi Emperor was enthroned as emperor of China in Beijing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ponytail</span> Hairstyle gathering hair at the back of the head

A ponytail is a hairstyle in which some, most, or all of the hair on the head is pulled away from the face, gathered and secured at the back of the head with a hair tie, clip, or other similar accessory and allowed to hang freely from that point. It gets its name from its resemblance to the tail of a pony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Aisin-Gioro</span> Manchu clan and imperial house of China

The House of Aisin-Gioro is a Manchu clan that ruled the Later Jin dynasty (1616–1636), the Qing dynasty (1636–1912), and Manchukuo (1932–1945) in the history of China. Under the Ming dynasty, members of the Aisin Gioro clan served as chiefs of the Jianzhou Jurchens, one of the three major Jurchen tribes at this time. Qing bannermen passed through the gates of the Great Wall in 1644, and eventually conquered the short-lived Shun dynasty, Xi dynasty and Southern Ming dynasty. After gaining total control of China proper, the Qing dynasty later expanded into other adjacent regions, including Xinjiang, Tibet, Outer Mongolia, and Taiwan. The dynasty reached its zenith during the High Qing era and under the Qianlong Emperor, who reigned from 1735 to 1796. This reign was followed by a century of gradual decline.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bun (hairstyle)</span> Type of hairstyle

A bun is a type of hairstyle in which the hair is pulled back from the face, twisted or plaited, and wrapped in a circular coil around itself, typically on top or back of the head or just above the neck. A bun can be secured with a hair tie, barrette, bobby pins, one or more hair sticks, and a hairnet. Hair may also be wrapped around a piece called a "rat". Various hair bun inserts may be used to create donut-shaped buns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pigtail Ordinance</span>

The Pigtail Ordinance was an 1873 law intended to force prisoners in San Francisco, California to have their hair cut within an inch of the scalp. It affected Qing Chinese prisoners in particular, as it meant they would have their queue, a waist-long, braided pigtail, cut off. The proposal passed by a narrow margin through the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1873 but was vetoed by the mayor. An identical version of the law was enacted by the California State Legislature in 1876 and was subsequently struck down as unconstitutional in 1879.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanfu Movement</span> Revival movement of traditional Chinese garments

Hanfu Movement, also known as the Hanfu Revival Movement, is a homegrown, grassroots cultural movement seeking to revive or revitalize Han Chinese fashion. It finds its manifestation in the wearing in public of the traditional Han attire of pre-Qing era. It began as the elegant pastime of a historically-conscious subculture and has evolved into a trendy nationwide movement boasting millions of young consumers and led by fashion-conscious youth. It has also slowly gained traction amongst the overseas Chinese diaspora, especially in countries like Singapore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nurhaci</span> Founding khan of Later Jin

Nurhaci, also known by his temple name as the Emperor Taizu of Qing, was the founding khan of the Jurchen-led Later Jin dynasty.

Chen Mingxia was Grand Secretariat and President of Ministry Personnel of the Qing dynasty. He was from Liyang in Jiangsu and was a Chinese official during the Shunzhi period (1644–1661) of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912). Before joining the Qing in early 1645, he had successively served the Ming dynasty (1368–1644) and the short-lived Shun regime of rebel leader Li Zicheng (1602–1645). He then served in the highest ranks of the Qing bureaucracy, being promoted to Grand Secretariat of the empire.

The history of the Qing dynasty began in the first half of the 17th century, when the Qing dynasty was established and became the last imperial dynasty of China, succeeding the Ming dynasty (1368–1644). The Manchu leader Hong Taiji renamed the Later Jin established by his father Nurhaci to "Great Qing" in 1636, sometimes referred to as the Predynastic Qing in historiography. By 1644 the Shunzhi Emperor and his prince regent seized control of the Ming capital Beijing, and the year 1644 is generally considered the start of the dynasty's rule. The Qing dynasty lasted until 1912, when Puyi abdicated the throne in response to the 1911 Revolution. As the final imperial dynasty in Chinese history, the Qing dynasty reached heights of power unlike any of the Chinese dynasties which preceded it, engaging in large-scale territorial expansion which ended with embarrassing defeat and humiliation to the foreign powers whom they believe to be inferior to them. The Qing dynasty's inability to successfully counter Western and Japanese imperialism ultimately led to its downfall, and the instability which emerged in China during the final years of the dynasty ultimately paved the way for the Warlord Era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transition from Ming to Qing</span> Period of Chinese history (1618–1683)

The transition from Ming to Qing or the Manchu conquest of China from 1618 to 1683 saw the transition between two major dynasties in Chinese history. It was a decades-long conflict between the emerging Qing dynasty, the incumbent Ming dynasty, and several smaller factions. It ended with the consolidation of Qing rule, and the fall of the Ming and several other factions.

<i>Hanfu</i> Traditional dress of the Han Chinese people

Hanfu, are the traditional styles of clothing worn by the Han Chinese since the 2nd millennium BCE. There are several representative styles of hanfu, such as the ruqun, the aoqun, the beizi and the shenyi, and the shanku.

Secular laws regulating hairstyles exist in various countries and institutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fashion in the Liao dynasty</span> Liao dynasty fashion

After the fall of the Tang dynasty, the Khitans, a branch of the Eastern Xianbei tribes, established Liao dynasty in northern China. The Liao dynasty comprised two regions: the Northern and Southern Divisions. The Northern divisions of Liao was mainly composed of tribal Khitan people while the Southern regions was composed of the Han and other sedentary groups. The rulers of the Liao dynasty adopted a clothing system which allowed the coexistence of Han and Khitan clothing.

Tifayifu was a cultural policy of the early Qing dynasty as it conquered the preceding Ming dynasty. In 1645, the Tifayifu edict forced Han Chinese people to adopt the Manchu hairstyle, the queue, and Manchu clothing. The edict specifically applied to living adult men, who did not fall in the stipulated exceptions. In 1644, on the first day when the Manchu penetrated the Great Wall of China in the Battle of Shanhai Pass, the Manchu rulers ordered the surrendering Han Chinese population to shave their heads; however, this policy was halted just a month later due to intense resistance from the Han Chinese near Beijing. Only after the Manchu captured Nanjing, the southern capital, from the Southern Ming in 1645 was the Tifayifu policy resumed and enforced severely. Within one year after entering China proper, the Qing rulers demanded that men among their newly defeated subjects adopt the Manchu hairstyle or face execution. The Qing prince regent Dorgon initially canceled the order to shave for all men in Ming territories south of the Great Wall. The full Tifayifu edict was only implemented after two Han officials from Shandong, Sun Zhixie and Li Ruolin, voluntarily shaved their foreheads and demanded that Dorgon impose the queue hairstyle on the entire population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qizhuang</span> Traditional Manchu clothing

Qizhuang, also known as Manfu and commonly referred as Manchu clothing in English, is the traditional clothing of the Manchu people. Qizhuang in the broad sense refers to the clothing system of the Manchu people, which includes their whole system of attire used for different occasions with varying degrees of formality. The term qizhuang can also be used to refer to a type of informal dress worn by Manchu women known as chenyi, which is a one-piece long robe with no slits on either sides. In the Manchu tradition, the outerwear of both men and women includes a full-length robe with a jacket or a vest while short coats and trousers are worn as inner garments.

After the Jin dynasty was founded, the Jin dynasty rulers imitated the Song dynasty and decided to establish their own carriages and apparel system.

References

  1. Evans, Thammy (2006). Great Wall of China: Beijing & Northern China. Bradt Travel Guide Great Wall of China. Bradt Travel Guides. p. 41. ISBN   1841621587.
  2. University of Hawaii at Manoa Art Gallery; Chazen Museum of Art; Museum of International Folk Art (N.M.); Evergrand Art Museum (Taoyuan, Taiwan) (2009). Writing with Thread: Traditional Textiles of South Minorities : a Special Exhibition from the Collection of Huang Ying Feng and the Evergrand Art Museum in Taoyuan, Taiwan. University of Hawai'i Art Gallery. p. 118. ISBN   978-0982033210.
  3. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley; Walthall, Anne; Palais, James B. (2006). Pre-modern East Asia: To 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Houghton Mifflin. p. 370. ISBN   0618133860.
  4. Millward, James (1998). Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759–1864 (illustrated ed.). Stanford University Press. p. 305. ISBN   0804729336.
  5. Bromber, Katrin; Krawietz, Birgit; Maguire, Joseph, eds. (2013). Sport Across Asia: Politics, Cultures, and Identities. Vol. 21 (illustrated ed.). Routledge. p. 53. ISBN   978-0415884389.
  6. Rubo, Han; Liu, Hatty (23 July 2019). "Hairy History". The World of Chinese . Retrieved 12 September 2024.
  7. Pyun, Kyunghee; Wong, Aida Yuen (2018). Fashion, Identity, and Power in Modern Asia. Springer. ISBN   978-3319971995.
  8. East Asian History. 1994. p. 54.
  9. Godley, Michael R. (December 1994). "The End of the Queue: Hair as a Symbol in Chinese History" (PDF). East Asian History (8).
  10. Kuwayama, George (1991). Ancient Mortuary Traditions of China: Papers on Chinese Ceramic Funerary Sculptures. Far Eastern Art Council, Los Angeles County Museum of Art. p. 59. ISBN   978-0-87587-157-8.
  11. Abramson, Marc Samuel (2005). "4 Deep Eyes and High Noses : Physiognomy and the depiction of barbarians in Tang China". In Di Cosmo, Nicola; Wyatt, Don J (eds.). Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History (illustrated ed.). Routledge. pp. 126, 127. ISBN   1135790957.
  12. Duan, Wenjie; Kapila Vatsyayan (1994). Tan, Chung (ed.). Dunhuang Art: Through the Eyes of Duan Wenjie. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. p. 118. ISBN   8170173132.
  13. Chan, Hok-Lam (2009). "Ming Taizu's 'Placards' on Harsh Regulations and Punishments Revealed in Gu Qiyuan's 'Kezuo Zhuiyu.'". Asia Major. 22 (1): 28. JSTOR   41649963 . Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  14. Keay, John (2011). China: A History. Basic Books. p. 312. ISBN   978-0-465-02518-3.
  15. Keay, John (2011). China: A History. Basic Books. p. 335. ISBN   978-0-465-02518-3.
  16. Franke, Herbert; Twitchett, Denis C. (1994). The Cambridge History of China: Volume 6, Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-24331-5.
  17. Tackett, Nicolas (2017). The Origins of the Chinese Nation: Song China and the Forging of an East Asian World Order. Cambridge University Press. p. 241. ISBN   978-1108186926.
  18. Zhu, Ruixi; Zhang, Bangwei; Liu, Fusheng; Cai, Chongbang; Wang, Zengyu (2016). A Social History of Medieval China. The Cambridge China Library. Bang Qian Zhu (translator), Peter Ditmanson (contributor) (illustrated ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN   978-1107167865.
  19. Liu, Cary Yee-Wei; Ching, Dora C. Y., eds. (1999). Arts of the Sung and Yüan: Ritual, Ethnicity, and Style in Painting. contributors: Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Princeton University. Art Museum, Kuo li ku kung po wu yüan, Guo li gu gong bo wu yuan. Art Museum, Princeton University. pp. 168, 159, 179. ISBN   0943012309.
  20. Shen, Hsueh-man; Asia Society, eds. (2006). Gilded Splendor: Treasures of China's Liao Empire. contributors: Asia Society Museum, Museum für Ostasiatische Kunst (Berlin, Germany), Museum Rietberg (illustrated ed.). Harry N. Abrams. p. 114. ISBN   8874393326.
  21. Zhou, Xun; Gao, Chunming; Shang-hai shih hsi chʿü hsüeh hsiao.; Chung-kuo fu chuang shih yen chiu tsu (1987). 5000 years of Chinese costumes (reprint ed.). Commercial Press. p. 130. ISBN   9620750551.
  22. Tung, W. U.; Tung, Wu; Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (1997). Tales from the Land of Dragons: 1000 Years of Chinese Painting (illustrated ed.). Museum of Fine Arts. p. 136. ISBN   0878464395.
  23. Johnson, Linda Cooke (2011). Women of the Conquest Dynasties: Gender and Identity in Liao and Jin China. UPCC book collections on Project MUSE (illustrated ed.). University of Hawaiʻi Press. pp. 53, 190. ISBN   978-0824834043.
  24. Johnson, Linda Cooke (2011). Women of the Conquest Dynasties: Gender and Identity in Liao and Jin China. UPCC book collections on Project MUSE (illustrated ed.). University of Hawaiʻi Press. pp. 48, 52, 53. ISBN   978-0824834043.
  25. "China Review International, Volume 19". China Review International. 19. University of Hawaiʻi, Center for Chinese Studies and University of Hawaii Press: 101. 2012.
  26. 张博泉 (Zhang Boquan) (1984), pp. 97–98.
  27. Sinor 1996, p. 417.
  28. Jia Sheng (贾笙), 宋金时代的“留发不留头” Archived 16 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine ("Keep the hair, lose the head" in the Song-Jin era)
  29. "身体的争夺与展示" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2011.
  30. Zi Yunju (紫雲居). 中國的髮爪與接觸巫術 [Hair, nails, and magic of China]. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011.
  31. Li Ziming (李子明). 剃头的故事晚清出国人员生活小记 [Barber's tale: notes from the life of Chinese abroad in the late Qing era]. Archived from the original on 11 July 2011.
  32. Lao Lu (Chinese:老鲁), Chinese:彻底改变两百年官定习俗 民国初年剪辫轶话 Archived 1 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine (Thoroughly changing the customs officially established for 200 years: the story of queue-cutting in the early Republic of China period)
  33. Forsyth, James (1994). A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia's North Asian Colony 1581–1990 (illustrated, reprint, revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 214. ISBN   0521477719.
  34. Majewicz, Alfred F., ed. (2011). Materials for the Study of Tungusic Languages and Folklore (illustrated, reprint ed.). Walter de Gruyter. p. 21. ISBN   978-3110221053. Volume 15, Issue 4 of Trends in Linguistics. Documentation [TiLDOC]
  35. Paolo Santangelo (2013). Zibuyu, "What The Master Would Not Discuss", according to Yuan Mei (1716–1798): A Collection of Supernatural Stories (2 vols). Brill. pp. 829–. ISBN   978-90-04-21628-0.
  36. Evelyn S. Rawski (1998). The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions . University of California Press. pp.  41–. ISBN   978-0-520-92679-0. tifa queue.
  37. 清朝乾隆23年清政府令平埔族人學清俗 Archived 9 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  38. "清朝之剃髮結辮" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2009.
  39. "On Qing Government's Land Policy towards Chaoxian Reclamation People of Break Probibition".[ permanent dead link ]
  40. "论清朝对图们江以北朝鲜垦民的"薙发易服"政策". ltgx.net. Archived from the original on 23 March 2020. Retrieved 9 January 2010.
  41. De Bary; William T. (1999). Sources of Chinese Tradition. Columbia University Press. p. 326.
  42. Godley, Michael R. (September 2011). "The End of the Queue: Hair as Symbol in Chinese History". China Heritage Quarterly (27). China Heritage Project, ANU College of Asia & the Pacific (CAP), The Australian National University. ISSN   1833-8461.
  43. Meyer-Fong, Tobie (2013). What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China (illustrated ed.). Stanford University Press. p. 83. ISBN   978-0804785594.
  44. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620–1720. Cambridge University Press. p. 77. ISBN   978-1316453841.
  45. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620–1720. Cambridge University Press. p. 86. ISBN   978-1316453841.
  46. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620–1720. Cambridge University Press. p. 187. ISBN   978-1316453841.
  47. 1 2 Kuhn, Philip A. (1990). Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768. Harvard University Press. pp. 53–54.
  48. Wakeman (1985) , p. 647; Struve (1988) , p. 662; Dennerline (2002) , p. 87 which calls this edict "the most untimely promulgation of [Dorgon's] career."
  49. Wakeman 1985, p. 868.
  50. Lui, Adam Yuen-chung (1989). Two Rulers in One Reign: Dorgon and Shun-chih, 1644–1660. Faculty of Asian Studies monographs // The Australian National University (illustrated ed.). Faculty of Asian Studies, Australian National University. p. 37. ISBN   0731506545. Dorgon did not want to see anything go wrong in a province and this might be the main reason why the government ... When the Chinese were ordered to wear the queue, Sun and Li took the initiative in changing their Ming hairstyle to ...
  51. Cheng, Weikun (1998). "6 politics of the queue: agitation and resistance in the beginning and end of qing china". In Hiltebeitel, Alf; Miller, Barbara D. (eds.). Hair: Its Power and Meaning in Asian Cultures (illustrated ed.). SUNY Press. p. 125. ISBN   0791437418.
  52. Hang, Xing (2016). "2 From smuggler-pirates to loyal Confucians". Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620–1720. Cambridge University Press. p. 40. ISBN   978-1316453841.
  53. Wakeman (1985), pp.  647, 650.
  54. Chee Kiong Tong; et al. (2001). Alternate Identities: The Chinese of Contemporary Thailand . Brill Publishers. p.  44. ISBN   978-981-210-142-6. keep your hair and lose your head.
  55. 研堂見聞雜記
  56. Faure (2007), p. 164.
  57. Ebrey (1993), p. [ page needed ].
  58. Ebrey (1993), p. 271.
  59. Wakeman 1975b , p. 83
  60. Godley, Michael R. (September 2011). "The End of the Queue: Hair as Symbol in Chinese History". China Heritage Quarterly (27). China Heritage Project, The Australian National University. ISSN   1833-8461.
  61. Justus Doolittle (1876). Social Life of the Chinese: With Some Account of Their Religious, Governmental, Educational, and Business Customs and Opinions. With Special But Not Exclusive Reference to Fuhchau. Harpers. pp. 242–.
  62. Edward J. M. Rhoads (2000). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928. University of Washington Press. pp. 61–. ISBN   978-0-295-98040-9.
  63. Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John K. (2008) Cambridge History of China Volume 9 Part 1 The Ch'ing Empire to 1800, pp. 87–88
  64. 周锡保. 《中国古代服饰史》. 中国戏剧出版社. 2002: 449. ISBN   978-7104003595.
  65. Lipman, Jonathan N. (1997). "4 / Strategies of Resistance Integration by Violence". Familiar Strangers : A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. p. 105. ISBN   0-295-97644-6.
  66. Lipman, Jonathan N. (2011). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. ISBN   978-0295800554.
  67. Lipman, Jonathan N. (1997). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. ISBN   978-0-295-97644-0. JSTOR   j.ctvbtzmb8.
  68. Arienne M. Dwyer (2007). Salar. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 22. ISBN   978-3-447-04091-4.
  69. Pamela Kyle Crossley; Helen F. Siu; Donald S. Sutton (2006). Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China. University of California Press. p. 127. ISBN   978-0-520-23015-6.
  70. Chen, Yangbin (2008). Muslim Uyghur Students in a Chinese Boarding School: Social Recapitalization as a Response to Ethnic Integration. Emerging Perspectives on Education in China. Lexington Books. p. 165. ISBN   978-1461633846.
  71. Yakup, Abdurishid (2005). The Turfan Dialect of Uyghur. Vol. 63 of Turcologica Series (illustrated ed.). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 187. ISBN   3447052333.
  72. Brophy, David (2016). Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier. Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0674970465.
  73. James Millward (1998). Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759–1864. Stanford University Press. pp. 204–. ISBN   978-0-8047-9792-4.
  74. Hiltebeitel, Alf, ed. (1998). Hair: Its Power and Meaning in Asian Cultures. State University of New York Press. p. 128.
  75. 1 2 "鄭氏王朝的滅亡". taiwanus.net.
  76. ""cutting tail"reflected the jiang nan social in guang xu dynasty two years" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 August 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2009.
  77. "清代妖术恐慌及政府的对策:以两次剪辫谣言为例_历史千年". lsqn.cn. 24 April 2013. Archived from the original on 24 April 2013.
  78. 頭可斷辮子不可剪 清朝留學生剪辮=偷了情 Archived 3 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  79. Wiltshire, Trea. [First published 1987] (republished & reduced 2003). Old Hong Kong – Volume One. Central, Hong Kong: Text Form Asia books Ltd. ISBN 962-7283-59-2 (Vol. One)
  80. Anthony, Robert J. (2014). "Violence and Predation on the Sino-Vietnamese Maritime Frontier, 1450–1850". Asia Major. 27 (2): 104. JSTOR   44740552 . Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  81. Modern Chinese Literature and Culture, Volume 19, Issue 1. Foreign Language Publications. 2007. p. 175.
  82. Edward J. M. Rhoads (2000). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928. University of Washington Press. pp. 60–. ISBN   978-0-295-98040-9.
  83. The Museum Journal. The Museum. 1921. pp. 102–.
  84. George Cockburn (1896). John Chinaman: His Ways and Notions. J. Gardner Hitt. pp.  86–.
  85. James, Henry Evan Murchison (1888). The Long White Mountain, or, A journey in Manchuria: with some account of the history, people, administration and religion of that country. Longmans, Green, and Co. pp.  110–112.
  86. Boulger, Demetrius C. (1899). "The Dissolution of the Chinese Empire". The North American Review. 168 (508): 264. JSTOR   25119153.
  87. Boulger, Demetrius C. (1900). "America's Share in a Partition of China". The North American Review. 171 (525): 171–181. JSTOR   25105038.
  88. Boulger, Demetrius Charles (28 April 1893). "Chapter IX". China (PDF). p. 76.
  89. Meyer-Fong, Tobie (2013). What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China (illustrated ed.). Stanford University Press. p. 94. ISBN   978-0804785594.
  90. Anderson, James A.; Whitmore, John K. (2014). China's Encounters on the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier Over Two Millennia. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 3 Southeast Asia (reprint, revised ed.). Brill. p. 309. ISBN   978-9004282483.
  91. Annam and its Minor Currency, chapter 16.
  92. "新疆曾有大批越南皇室后裔,乾隆时期投靠中国并前往乌鲁木齐开荒" (in Chinese). 27 May 2018.
  93. Thái Mỹ (24 April 2019). "Con trai vua Lê Thế Tông ở đất Thanh Châu" (in Vietnamese).
  94. Lê Tiên Long (9 December 2018). "After Minh Mang reigned Nguyen Dynasty, why he deported Le royal descendants to the Southern Vietnam?" (in Vietnamese).
  95. Joan Nunn (2000). Fashion in Costume, 1200–2000. New Amsterdam Books. p. 62. ISBN   9781566632799.
  96. Francis Michael Kelly, Randolph Schwabe (2002). European Costume and Fashion, 1490–1790. Dover Publications. p. 168. ISBN   9780486423227.
  97. Heather Vaughan Lee, José Blanco F., Mary Doering, Patricia Kay Hunt-Hurst (2015). Clothing and Fashion [4 Volumes] American Fashion from Head to Toe [4 Volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 135. ISBN   9781610693103.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  98. Mark Ledbury, Robert Wellington (2020). The Versailles Effect: Objects, Lives, and Afterlives of the Domaine. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 98. ISBN   9781501357763.
  99. Lynn Festa (2005). "Personal Effects: Wigs and Possessive Individualism in the Long Eighteenth Century". Eighteenth-Century Life. 29 (2): 59.
  100. Bruce W. Menning, David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye (2004). Reforming the Tsar's Army. Military Innovation in Imperial Russia from Peter the Great to the Revolution. Cambridge University Press. p. 279. ISBN   9780521819886.
  101. Beverly Chico (2013). Hats and Headwear Around the World A Cultural Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 484. ISBN   9781610690638.
  102. Philip Dwyer (2007). Napoleon, The Path to Power 1769 - 1799. Yale University Press. p. 472. ISBN   978-0-300-13754-5.
  103. Terry Crowdy (2015). Napoleon's Infantry Handbook An Essential Guide to Life in the Grand Army. Pen & Sword Military. p. 78. ISBN   9781783462957.
  104. R. F. Delderfield (2002). Napoleon's Marshals. Cooper Square Press. p. 74. ISBN   9781461661191.
  105. Janice Best (2023). Power and Propaganda in French Second Empire Theatre Playing Napoleon. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 237. ISBN   9781527500914.
  106. Stocqueler, Joachim Hayward (1871) A Familiar History of the British Army, from the Restoration in 1660 to the Present Time, Edward Stanford, London (pp. 103–104)
  107. Wilkinson-Latham, Robert (1977) The Royal Navy, 1790–1970 Osprey Publishing, ISBN   0-85045-248-1 (p. 34)
  108. Hudson, Elizabeth Harriot (1878), (The Life And Times of Louisa, Queen of Prussia With an Introductory Sketch of Prussian History: Volume II reprinted by Adamant Media Corporation (13 September 2001) (pp. 214–215)
  109. Borch, Fred L. (March 2012). "Lore of the Corps – The True Story of a Colonel's Pigtail and a Court-Martial". The Army Lawyer (Special Edition): 1–2. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  110. Wilentz 2008 , p. 202

Works cited

Further reading

Queue
Chinese Meal by Lai Afong, c1880.JPG
Chinese-American men with queues in Chinatown, San Francisco, 1880s
Romanization soncoho