Selective androgen receptor modulator | |
---|---|
Drug class | |
Class identifiers | |
Synonyms | Nonsteroidal androgen (although not all SARMs are nonsteroidal) [1] |
Use | Investigational |
Biological target | Androgen receptor |
Chemical class | Mostly nonsteroidal |
Legal status | |
Legal status | |
In Wikidata |
Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a class of drugs that selectively activate the androgen receptor in specific tissues, promoting muscle and bone growth while having less effect on male reproductive tissues like the prostate gland.
Non-selective steroidal drugs, called anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), have been used for various medical purposes, but their side effects limit their use. In 1998, researchers discovered a new class of non-steroidal compounds, the SARMs. These compounds selectively stimulate the androgen receptor, offering potent effects on bone and muscle to increase bone density and lean body mass while having minimal impact on reproductive tissues.
SARMs have been investigated in human studies for the treatment of osteoporosis, cachexia (wasting syndrome), benign prostatic hyperplasia, stress urinary incontinence, and breast cancer. As of 2023 [update] , there are no SARMs which have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency. Although adverse effects in clinical studies have been infrequent and mild, SARMs can cause elevated liver enzymes, reduction of HDL cholesterol levels, and hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (HPG axis) suppression, among other side effects.
Since the early twenty-first century, SARMs have been used in doping; they were banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency in 2008. SARMs are readily available on internet-based gray markets and are commonly used recreationally to stimulate muscle growth.
Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are used to treat a variety of medical conditions, but their side effects have fueled a search for a new class of drugs, with a better separation between desirable anabolic and undesirable androgenic effects. The first clinically used AAS was testosterone which was discovered in 1935 and first approved for medical use in 1939. [5] AAS including those produced endogenously such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), bind to and activate the androgen receptor (AR) to produce their effects. AAS effects can be separated into androgenic (the development and maintenance of male sexual characteristics) and anabolic (increasing bone density, muscle mass and strength). AAS also affect hematopoiesis, coagulation, metabolism, and cognition. [6] [7] For most medical applications, an AAS with potent anabolic and minimal androgenic and cardiovascular effects would be an advantage.
In the 1930s, 17α-alkylated anabolic steroids were discovered. These have increased metabolic stability and are orally active, but are not tissue selective. [8] These alkylated anabolic steroids still have significant androgenic effects, and are also hepatotoxic. [9] [10] In 1950, nandrolone (19-nortestosterone) was first synthesized, which is sometimes considered a SARM due to greater tissue selectivity than testosterone. [8] [10] [11] In addition, 7α-alkyl substitution of testosterone (for example trestolone) has also been reported to increase its anabolic effects. [8] However, efforts to develop a steroid with anabolic but minimal androgenic effects were not successful. [12]
Interest in nonsteroidal AR mixed agonists/antagonists increased after the therapeutic uses of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) became evident. [13] The first SERM, tamoxifen, was originally developed as an anti-estrogen contraceptive. However, it was discovered it promoted ovulation in humans by acting as an agonist in ovaries. The drug was then successfully repurposed as a treatment for breast cancer where it was found to act as a full antagonist in breast tissue. [14] Somewhat unexpectedly, it was also discovered that tamoxifen preserves bone density [15] by acting as an agonist in bone resorbing osteoclasts. [16] The clinical success of SERMs stimulated interest in analogous tissue selective drugs that target the AR. [7]
The chemical starting point for AR mixed agonist/antagonists were nonsteroidal AR antiandrogens such as flutamide, nilutamide, bicalutamide. These antagonists work by binding to the AR to prevent androgenic action; this class of chemicals dates to the 1970s. [6] [13] The discovery of arylpropionamides, which share structural similarity with bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide, suggested a way to make compounds that bind to the AR and produce both anabolic and antiandrogenic effects. [6] Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) were developed out of a desire to maintain the anabolic effects of androgens on muscle and bone, while avoiding side effects on other tissues such as the prostate and cardiovascular system. [9]
The first non-steroidal SARMs were developed in 1998 independently by two research groups, one at the University of Tennessee that created an arylpropionamide SARM and Ligand Pharmaceuticals that made a SARM with a quinolone core structure. The name was adopted by analogy with SERMs. [13] Other SARMs include tetrahydroquinolines, tricyclics, bridged tricyclics, aniline, diaryl aniline, bicylclic hydantoins, benzimidazole, imidazolopyrazole, indole, and pyrazoline derivatives. [6] SARMs can be agonists, antagonists, or partial agonists of the AR depending on the tissue, which can enable targeting specific medical conditions while minimizing side effects. [7] Those that have advanced to human trials show stronger effects in bone and muscle tissue and weaker effects in the prostate. [8]
Unlike most current forms of testosterone replacement, SARMs are orally bioavailable [7] and largely eliminated via hepatic metabolism and metabolized through amide hydrolysis in the case of arylpropionamides and A-ring nitro reduction of andarine. [9]
Because of the potentially better side effect profile of SARMs compared to testosterone, SARMs have been proposed for use in the treatment of hypogonadism and for androgen replacement therapy. [17] [18] [19] Phase I and II trials have provided preliminary evidence that the SARMs enobosarm and GSK-2881078 (in elderly men and postmenopausal women), and OPL-88004 (prostate cancer survivors with low levels of testosterone) increase lean body mass and muscle size with little effect on the prostate, supporting the potential of SARMs for use in hormone replacement therapy. [9] However, it has been argued that SARMs are not ideal for use in androgen replacement therapy and could not replace testosterone in this context as they do not reproduce testosterone's full spectrum of effects, including androgenic potentiation via 5α-reduction and aromatization into estrogen. [20] [21] Estrogenic signaling in particular is essential for normal male physiology and health, including for instance maintenance of bone strength. [22] [23]
The mechanism of action of SARMs' tissue-specific effects continues to be debated as of 2020 [update] . [6] [24] A number of hypotheses have been advanced. These include the non-activation of SARMs by 5α-reductase, tissue selective expression of androgen receptor coregulators, non-genomic signaling, and tissue selective uptake of SARMs. [6] [25]
Testosterone is active in non-reproductive tissue without activation. In contrast, tissue selective activation by 5α-reductase to the more active form DHT is required for significant activity in reproductive tissue. The net result is that testosterone and its metabolite together are not tissue selective. [26] SARMs are not substrates of 5α-reductase, hence they are not selectively activated like testosterone in tissues such as prostate. [10] This lack of activation effectively imparts a degree of tissue selectivity to SARMs. [27]
Tissue selective transcription coregulator expression is another possible contributor to the selectivity of SARMs. [28] [25] Like other type I nuclear receptors, the unliganded androgen receptor (AR) resides in the cytosol complexed with heat shock proteins (HSP). Upon ligand binding, the AR freed from HSPs and translocated into the nucleus where it binds to androgen response elements on DNA to regulate gene expression. [29] AR agonists such as testosterone recruit coactivator proteins to AR that facilitate upregulation of gene expression while antagonists recruit corepressors which down regulate gene expression. Furthermore, the ratio of coactivators to corepressors is known to vary depending on tissue type. [28] [19] Structurally, pure AR agonists stabilize the position of helix-12 (H12) in the ligand binding domain of AR near H3 and H4 to produce a surface cleft that binds to a FxxLF motif contained in coactivators. [29] Conversely, antagonists destabilize the agonist conformation of H12 blocking the binding of the FXXLF coactivator motif while facilitating the binding of the corepressor LXX(I/H)IXXX(I/L) motif found in NCOR1 and SMRT corepressors. [29]
In analogy to SERMs, SARMs are mixed agonists/antagonists displaying agonist androgen receptor activity in bone and muscle and partial agonist or antagonist activity in other tissues such as prostate. [25] [7] Non-selective agonists such as testosterone are able to recruit coactivators when bound to AR but not corepressors and hence are agonists in all tissues. In contrast, SARMs can recruit both coactivators and corepressors by partially destabilizing the agonist conformation of H12. In tissues where coactivators are in excess (as in bone and muscle), SARMs act as agonists. Conversely, in tissues where corepressors are in excess (such as prostate), SARMs act as partial agonists or antagonists. [25]
In vitro testing of the SARMs enobosarm (ostarine) and YK-11 showed that they bound to the AR, but unlike full AR agonists, they blocked interaction between the N-terminus and C-terminus of AR which resulted in a mixed agonist/antagonist mode of action. [6] [25]
In addition to the regulation of gene expression by nuclear AR, membrane associated AR is known to have rapid non-genomic effects on cells through signal transduction cascades. Non-genomic effects appear to significantly contribute to the anabolic effects of androgens whereas genomic effects are primarily responsible for the development of male sexual organs. Furthermore, each steroidal androgen or non-steroidal SARM uniquely influences distinct pathways depending on cell type. [25]
Tissue selective uptake into anabolic tissues presents another potential mechanism for SARM tissue selectivity. However autoradiography studies with radiolabeled SARMs show no preferential distribution to anabolic tissues. [10]
Name | Class | Developer | Investigated for | Highest development stage reached | Structure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andarine (S-4, GTx-007) | Arylpropionamide | GTx, Oncternal Therapeutics [31] | Cachexia [31] | Phase I (discontinued) [31] | |
Arcarine (ORM-11984) [32] | Unknown [30] | Orion Corporation [32] | Benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypogonadism, osteoporosis [30] | Phase I (discontinued) [32] [30] | Structure undisclosed [30] |
BMS-564,929 (PS-178990) | Pyrroloimidazole [30] | Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ligand Pharmaceuticals [33] | Andropause, cachexia [33] [30] | Phase I (discontinued) [33] [34] [30] | [30] |
DT-200 (GLPG-0492) | Imidazolidine-2,4-dione | ProSkelia, Akashi Therapeutics, Galapagos NV [35] | Muscular dystrophy, cachexia [35] | Phase I [30] [35] [36] | |
Enobosarm (ostarine, GTx-024, MK-2866, S-22) | Arylpropionamide | GTx, Veru Healthcare [37] | Breast cancer, cachexia, muscular dystrophy, stress urinary incontinence [37] | Phase III [37] [38] | |
GSK-971086 | Indole [39] | GlaxoSmithKline [40] | Sarcopenia [40] | Phase I (discontinued) [40] [41] | [39] |
GSK-2849466 | N-arylhydroxyalkyl [42] | GlaxoSmithKline [42] | Cachexia, heart failure [42] | Phase I (discontinued) [42] [43] | [42] |
GSK-2881078 | Indole | GlaxoSmithKline [44] | Cachexia [44] [45] | Phase II [44] [46] | |
GTx-027 | Arylpropionamide | GTx [47] [48] | Breast cancer, stress urinary incontinence [47] [48] | Phase I (discontinued) [47] [48] or preclinical [19] | |
LGD-2941 (LGD-122941) | Quinolinone | Ligand Pharmaceuticals [49] | Cachexia, sexual dysfunction, hypogonadism, menopause, osteoporosis [49] | Phase I (discontinued) [49] | |
LGD-4033 (VK5211, ligandrol) | Pyrrolidinebenzonitrile | Ligand Pharmaceuticals [50] | Muscle wasting due to hip fracture, cachexia, hypogonadism, osteoporosis [24] [50] | Phase II [50] [51] | |
LY305 | N-arylhydroxyalkyl | Eli Lilly [52] | Osteoporosis [52] | Phase I [52] | |
MK-0773 (PF-05314882) | Steroid | GTx, Merck [53] | Sarcopenia, osteoporosis [30] [53] | Phase II (discontinued) [30] [53] [54] [55] | |
MK-3984 | Benzylpropionamide | Merck | Sarcopenia [30] | Phase I [30] | |
OPK-88004 (LY-2452473, TT-701) | Indole | Eli Lilly, OPKO [56] | Benign prostatic hyperplasia, quality of life in prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction [56] [57] | Phase II [56] [58] | |
PF-06260414 | Isoquinoline | Pfizer [59] [60] | Cachexia [59] | Phase I (discontinued) [59] | |
Vosilasarm (RAD140, EP0062, testolone) | Phenyloxadiazole | Ellipsis [61] | Breast cancer, osteoporosis, sarcopenia [62] | Phase I/II [62] [63] | |
YK-11 | Steroid | Toho University | Muscle wasting [64] | Preclinical |
Certain anabolic steroids, like trestolone, dimethandrolone undecanoate, and 11β-methyl-19-nortestosterone dodecylcarbonate, have also sometimes been classified as SARMs. [30]
Due to their tissue selectivity, SARMs have the potential to treat a wide variety of conditions, including debilitating diseases. They have been investigated in human studies for the treatment of osteoporosis, cachexia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, stress urinary incontinence, prostate cancer, and breast cancer and have also been considered for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, hypogonadism and as a male contraceptive. [19] [7] As of 2023 [update] , there are no SARMs which have been approved for therapeutic use by the United States Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency. [65]
Most SARMs have been tested in vitro or on rodents, while limited clinical trials in humans have been carried out. [6] [66] Initial research focused on muscle wasting. [25] Enobosarm (ostarine) is the most well-studied SARM; according to its manufacturer, GTx Incorporated, 25 studies have been carried out on more than 1,700 humans as of 2020 [update] involving doses from 1 to 18 mg each day. [67] [24] As of 2020 [update] , there is little research distinguishing different SARMs from each other. [6] Much of the research on SARMs has been conducted by corporations and has not been made publicly available. [8]
In rat models of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a condition where the prostate is enlarged in the absence of prostate cancer, SARMs reduced the weight of the prostate. [66] OPK-88004 advanced to a phase II trial in humans, but it was terminated due to difficulty in measuring prostate size, the trial's primary endpoint. [19]
SARMs may help treat AR and estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer, which comprise the majority of breast cancers. [7] [68] AAS were historically used successfully to treat AR positive breast cancer, but were phased out after the development of antiestrogen therapies, due to androgenic side effects and concerns about aromatization to estrogen (which does not occur with SARMs). [68] [25] Although a trial on AR positive triple negative breast cancer (which is ER-) was ended early due to lack of efficacy, enobosarm showed benefits in some patients with ER+, AR+ breast cancer in a phase II study. In patients with more than 40 percent AR positivity as determined by immunohistochemistry, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 80 percent and the objective response rate (ORR) was 48 percent—which was considered promising given that the patients had advanced disease and had been heavily pretreated. [69] [68] In 2022, the FDA granted fast track designation to enobosarm for AR+, ER+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer. [70] Other SARMs such as vosilasarm have reached clinical trials in breast cancer patients. [61]
As of 2020 [update] , there are no drugs approved to treat muscle wasting in people with chronic diseases, and there is therefore an unmet need for anabolic drugs with few side effects. One aspect hindering drug approval for treatments for cachexia and sarcopenia (two types of muscle wasting) is disagreement in what outcomes would demonstrate the efficacy of a drug. Several clinical trials have found that SARMs improve lean mass in humans, but it is not clear whether strength and physical function are also improved. After promising results in a phase II trial, a phase III trial of enobosarm was proven to increase lean body mass but did not show significant improvement in function. It and other drugs have been refused regulatory approval due to a lack of evidence that they increased physical performance; preventing decline in functionality was not considered an acceptable endpoint by the Food and Drug Administration. It is not known how SARMs interact with dietary protein intake and resistance training in people with muscle wasting. [24] [19]
Phase II trials of enobosarm for stress urinary incontinence—considered promising, given that the levator ani muscle in the pelvic floor has a high androgen receptor density—did not meet their endpoint and were abandoned. [19] [25]
Unlike other treatments for osteoporosis, which work by decreasing bone loss, SARMs have shown potential to promote growth in bone tissue. LY305 showed promising results in a phase I trial in humans. [19]
In contrast to AAS and testosterone replacement, which have many side effects that have curtailed their medical use, SARMs are well tolerated and have mild and infrequent adverse events in randomized controlled trials. [66] SARMs are sometimes claimed to be non-virilizing (non-masculinizing). [19] [71] In actuality however, SARMs are largely uncharacterized clinically in terms of potential virilizing effects. [6] In addition, SARMs cannot be aromatized to estrogen, thus causing no estrogenic side effects, for instance gynecomastia. [72] [19] [7]
SARM use can cause elevated liver enzymes and reduction in HDL cholesterol. [72] [19] Transdermal administration via a skin patch may reduce these effects. [19] [52] Several case reports have associated SARMs with hepatocellular drug-induced liver injury when used recreationally, [73] it is not known if the risk is significant for medical use. [66] [7] Whether SARMs increase the risk of cardiovascular events is unknown. [66] [7] SARMs have less effect on blood lipid profiles than testosterone replacement; it is not known whether androgen-induced HDL reductions increase cardiovascular risk; and SARMs increase insulin sensitivity and lower triglycerides. [7] [24]
Although they cause less suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (HPG axis) than testosterone, studies have found that gonadotropins, free and total testosterone, and SHBG can be reduced in a compound- and dose-dependent fashion in men from SARM usage. [6] [24] Typically SHBG is reduced along with total testosterone and total cholesterol while hematocrit is increased. Most studies have found that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prostate-specific antigen, estradiol, and DHT levels are not altered. [66] Of SARMs that have been investigated, enobosarm is one of the least suppressive of gonadotropins, even in doses much higher than used in clinical trials. How the HPG axis is affected in women using SARMs is unknown. [6] [24] SARMs' effect in suppressing the gonadotropins FSH and LH is what makes SARMs potentially useful as a male contraceptive. [74]
Outside of pharmaceutical research, SARMs are a gray market substance produced by small laboratories and often marketed as a research chemical supposedly not for human consumption. [6] [75] [76] Marketing SARMs for human consumption is illegal in some jurisdictions and has led to criminal convictions in the United States [77] and the largest-ever fine levied under Australia's Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. [78] Although SARMs are readily available for purchase on the internet, one study found that a majority of products advertised as SARMs online were mislabeled. Anecdotes and guides on usage can also be found online and on social media. [79] [72] [7] Some compounds are commonly marketed for recreational use as SARMs despite having a different mechanism of action. These substances include ibutamoren (MK-677), which increases secretion of growth hormone; GW501516 (cardarine), an exercise mimetic that works as an agonist of the PPARβ/δ; and SR9009 (Stenabolic), an agonist of the Rev-Erb, which plays a role in circadian rhythm. [6] [80]
SARMs are used by bodybuilders and competitive athletes due to their anabolic and lack of androgenic effects, [7] particularly in the United States, Europe, and other western countries. [72] Some individuals using SARMs recreationally combine multiple SARMs or take a SARM along with other compounds, although there is no research on combining SARMs. The doses used often exceed those from clinical trials; nevertheless, the fat-free mass gained from SARMs is generally lower than what is obtained with moderate doses of testosterone derivatives. [6] According to one study of SARM users, more than 90 percent were satisfied with their usage and 64 percent would take SARMs again even though a majority experienced adverse effects. [81]
SARMs were banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) in 2008. [6] SARMs can be detected in urine and hair after consumption. [82] WADA reported its first adverse analytical finding for SARMs in 2010 and the number of positive tests has increased since then; the most commonly detected SARMs are enobosarm (ostarine) and LGD-4033 (ligandrol). [83] [84] Athletes competing in the NFL, NBA, UFC, NCAA, and the Olympics have tested positive. [73] There is limited evidence on how SARMs affect athletic performance. [85]
SARMs are sometimes also referred to as "nonsteroidal androgens", [1] [86] although not all SARMs are nonsteroidal in structure and steroidal SARMs also exist. [30] The first SARMs, discovered in 1998, were nonsteroidal and were initially called nonsteroidal androgens. [87] In 1999, the term "selective androgen receptor modulator" or "SARM" was introduced, as the mixed agonist–antagonist and tissue-selective activity of these nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists had similarities with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). [17] Despite its widespread use, the term "selective androgen receptor modulator" has been criticized by some authors, like David Handelsman, who argue that it is a misleading pharmaceutical marketing term rather than an accurate pharmacological description. [20] He has also critiqued notions that SARMs isolate anabolic effects from androgenic or virilizing effects, as has been previously claimed in the case of anabolic steroids. [20] [88] [89] [90]
Anabolic steroids, also known as anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS), are a class of drugs that are structurally related to testosterone, the main male sex hormone, and produce effects by binding to the androgen receptor (AR). Anabolic steroids have a number of medical uses, but are also used by athletes to increase muscle size, strength, and performance.
BMS-564,929 is an investigational selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is being developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb for treatment of the symptoms of age-related decline in androgen levels in men ("andropause"). These symptoms may include depression, loss of muscle mass and strength, reduction in libido and osteoporosis. Treatment with exogenous testosterone is effective in counteracting these symptoms but is associated with a range of side effects, the most serious of which is enlargement of the prostate gland, which can lead to benign prostatic hyperplasia and even prostate cancer. This means there is a clinical need for selective androgen receptor modulators, which produce anabolic effects in some tissues such as muscle and bone, but without stimulating androgen receptors in the prostate.
S-40503 is an investigational selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) developed by the Japanese company Kaken Pharmaceuticals, which was developed for the treatment of osteoporosis. SARMs are a new class of drugs that produce tissue-specific anabolic effects in some tissues such as muscle and bone, but without stimulating androgen receptors in other tissues such as in the prostate gland, thus avoiding side effects such as benign prostatic hyperplasia which can occur following treatment with unselective androgens like testosterone or anabolic steroids.
LGD-2226 is an investigational selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), which is being developed for treatment of muscle wasting and osteoporosis.
Enobosarm, also formerly known as ostarine and by the developmental code names GTx-024, MK-2866, and S-22, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is under development for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive breast cancer in women and for improvement of body composition in people taking GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide. It was also under development for a variety of other indications, including treatment of cachexia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, muscle atrophy or sarcopenia, and stress urinary incontinence, but development for all other uses has been discontinued. Enobosarm was evaluated for the treatment of muscle wasting related to cancer in late-stage clinical trials, and the drug improved lean body mass in these trials, but it was not effective in improving muscle strength. As a result, enobosarm was not approved and development for this use was terminated. Enobosarm is taken by mouth.
Andarine is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which was developed by GTX, Inc for the treatment of conditions such as muscle wasting, osteoporosis, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), using the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide as a lead compound. Development of andarine for all indications has been discontinued, in favor of the structurally related and improved compound enobosarm.
Trenbolone enanthate, known by the nickname Trenabol, is a synthetic and injected anabolic–androgenic steroid (AAS) and a derivative of nandrolone which was never marketed. It is the C17β enanthate ester and a long-acting prodrug of trenbolone. Trenbolone enanthate was never approved for medical or veterinary use but is used in scientific research and has been sold on the internet black market as a designer steroid for bodybuilders and athletes.
LGD-4033, also known by the developmental code name VK5211 and by the black-market name Ligandrol, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is under development for the treatment of muscle atrophy in people with hip fracture. It was also under development for the treatment of cachexia, hypogonadism, and osteoporosis, but development for these indications was discontinued. LGD-4033 has been reported to dose-dependently improve lean body mass and muscle strength in preliminary clinical trials, but is still being developed and has not been approved for medical use. The drug is taken by mouth.
Vosilasarm, also known by the development codes RAD140 and EP0062 and by the black-market name Testolone or Testalone, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which is under development for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer. It is specifically under development for the treatment of androgen receptor-positive, estrogen receptor-negative, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Vosilasarm was also previously under development for the treatment of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and weight loss due to cancer cachexia, but development for these indications was discontinued. The drug is taken by mouth.
Acetothiolutamide is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) derived from the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide that was described in 2002 and was one of the first SARMs to be discovered and developed. It is a high-affinity, selective ligand of the androgen receptor (AR), where it acts as a full agonist in vitro, and has in vitro potency comparable to that of testosterone. However, in vivo, acetothiolutamide displayed overall negligible androgenic effects, though significant anabolic effects were observed at high doses. In addition, notable antiandrogen effects were observed in castrated male rats treated with testosterone propionate. The discrepancy between the in vitro and in vivo actions of acetothiolutamide was determined to be related to rapid plasma clearance and extensive hepatic metabolism into a variety of metabolites with differing pharmacological activity, including AR partial agonism and antagonism. In accordance with its poor metabolic stability, acetothiolutamide is not orally bioavailable, and shows activity only via injected routes such as subcutaneous and intravenous.
LG121071 is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) developed by Ligand Pharmaceuticals that was first described in 1999 and was the first orally active nonsteroidal androgen to be discovered. It is a tricyclic quinolone derivative, structurally distinct from other nonsteroidal AR agonists like andarine and enobosarm (ostarine). The drug acts as a high-affinity full agonist of the androgen receptor (AR), with a potency and efficacy that is said to be equivalent to that of dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Unlike testosterone, but similarly to DHT, LG121071 and other nonsteroidal androgens cannot be potentiated by 5α-reductase in androgenic tissues, and for this reason, show tissue-selective androgenic effects. In accordance, they are said to possess full anabolic activity with reduced androgenic activity, similarly to anabolic-androgenic steroids.
Dimethandrolone (DMA), also known by its developmental code name CDB-1321, is an experimental androgen/anabolic steroid (AAS) and progestogen medication which is under investigation for potential clinical use.
MK-0773, also known as PF-05314882, is a steroidal, orally active selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) that was under development by Merck and GTx for the treatment of sarcopenia in women and men. Clinical trials for sarcopenia began in late 2007 but the collaboration between Merck and GTx ended in early 2010 and GTx terminated development of MK-0773 shortly thereafter. MK-0773 was developed as a more advanced version of the related compound TFM-4AS-1.
The pharmacology of bicalutamide is the study of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) bicalutamide. In terms of pharmacodynamics, bicalutamide acts as a selective antagonist of the androgen receptor (AR), the biological target of androgens like testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). It has no capacity to activate the AR. It does not decrease androgen levels and has no other important hormonal activity. The medication has progonadotropic effects due to its AR antagonist activity and can increase androgen, estrogen, and neurosteroid production and levels. This results in a variety of differences of bicalutamide monotherapy compared to surgical and medical castration, such as indirect estrogenic effects and associated benefits like preservation of sexual function and drawbacks like gynecomastia. Bicalutamide can paradoxically stimulate late-stage prostate cancer due to accumulated mutations in the cancer. When used as a monotherapy, bicalutamide can induce breast development in males due to its estrogenic effects. Unlike other kinds of antiandrogens, it may have less adverse effect on the testes and fertility.
JNJ-37654032 is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which was developed by Johnson & Johnson for the potential treatment of muscular atrophy but was never marketed.
JNJ-26146900 is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which was developed by Johnson & Johnson for the potential treatment of prostate cancer but was never marketed.
GTx-027 is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which was under development for or of potential interest in the treatment of breast cancer and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) but was never marketed. It is taken by mouth.
MK-4541 is a dual selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) and 5α-reductase inhibitor (5α-RI) which has been of interest for the potential treatment of prostate cancer but has not been marketed at this time. It is intended for use by mouth.
SARMs are a novel group of compounds developed to selectively augment anabolic effects in muscles and bones, while avoiding undesirable androgenic effects in skin, larynx, and reproductive organs. The majority of these compounds lack the structural functionalities of the original anabolic steroids and are sometimes termed nonsteroidal androgens. It was hoped that these agents could be used in cases where conventional anabolic steroids produced undesirable side-effects, such as virilization in women and prostate hyperplasia in men [67]. Despite the enormous effort that has been expended in the development of selective anabolic agents, the androgenic effect is very hard to remove completely and many of the currently developed SARMs still do have some androgenic activity.
Sex-specific SARM effects on humans also remain considerably nebulous. SARMs may represent a more tempting option for female recreational use given potential previous tendencies towards less androgenic AAS (i.e. oxandrolone) [103]. Regardless, as the latter still imposes risk for permanent masculinization and hepatotoxicity, SARMs are largely uncharacterized for female-specific impacts.
One of the first synthetic analogs to testosterone prepared by the Noble laureate Ruzicka was 17α-methyltestosterone (Ruzicka et al. 1935).
We have chosen the term selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) after the terminology currently used for similar molecules targeting the estrogen receptor. ... Desired profile of activity of new SARMs: male applications: Selected indications may include glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, androgen replacement in elderly men, HIV-wasting, cancer cachexia, certain anemias, muscular dystrophies, and male contraception.
A SARM for the treatment of hypogonadism or osteoporosis would be an AR agonist in the muscle and bone, with minimal hypertrophic agonist effects in the prostate.
The next invention was that of the first non-steroidal androgen by Dalton et al. [111] in 1998, six decades after the first non-steroidal estrogen [112]. This creates a new class of non-steroidal synthetic androgen, often termed Specific Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARM), a misleading marketing term rather than an accurate pharmacological description [113,114], usurping a speculative but unsound analogy with Specific Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERM). [...] none of the non-steroidal androgens under development [116,117] are marketed by 2021. Yet hope springs eternal for this new attempt to separate anabolic from androgenic properties of androgens to facilitate marketing for muscle wasting and other selective effects of testosterone.
These features suggest that non-steroidal androgens have potential for development into pharmacologic androgen therapy regimens as tissue-selective mixed or partial androgen agonists ("selective androgen receptor modulators", SARM) (419, 718). Conversely, they are not ideal for androgen replacement therapy where the full spectrum of testosterone effects including aromatization is idealy required, especially for tissues such as the brain (148, 159) and bone (153) where aromatization is a prominent feature of testosterone action.
Although development of the first nonsteroidal androgens (17, 18) as candidate selective AR modulators (19) raises hope of resurrecting this defunct term (20), prereceptor activation mechanisms cannot apply to nonsteroidal androgens, and the singular AR lacks a dual drive mechanism of the other paired sex steroid receptors. Consequently, it is not surprising that available knowledge (21) provides only slender hope that this failed, and probably false, dichotomy will now succeed through a renewed search guided by the same in vivo bioassay.
However, a third major quest, for the development of a nonvirilizing androgen ("anabolic steroid") suitable for use in women and children, based on dissociating the virilizing from the anabolic effects of androgens failed comprehensively (36). This failure is now understood as being due to the discovery of a singular androgen receptor (AR) together with the misinterpretation of nonspecific whole animal androgen bioassays employed to distinguish between anabolic and virilizing effects (37). The term "androgen" is used herein for both endogenous and synthetic androgens including references to chemicals named elsewhere as "anabolic steroids," "anabolic-androgenic steroids," or "specific AR modulators" (SARM), which continue to make an obsolete and oxymoronic distinction between virilizing and anabolic effects of androgens where there is no difference (36).
The development of nonsteroidal androgens, marketed as "selective androgen receptor modulators" (SARMs), offers new possibilities for adjuvant pharmacological androgen therapy. In contrast to the full spectrum of androgen effects of testosterone, such SARMs would be pure androgens not subject to tissue-specific activation by aromatization to a corresponding estrogen or to amplification of androgenic potency by 5α-reduction. In this context the endogenous pure androgens nandrolone and DHT can be considered prototype SARMs. SARMs are not the modern embodiment of so-called "anabolic steroids," an outdated term referring to hypothetical but nonexistent non-virilizing androgens targeted exclusively to muscle, a failed concept lacking biological proof of principle (Handelsman 2011).