Biomass (ecology)

Last updated

7 - Itahuania - Aout 2008.JPG
The total global live biomass has been estimated at about 550 billion tonnes carbon, [1] most of which is found in forests.
Klamath river estuary.jpg
Shallow aquatic environments, such as wetlands, estuaries and coral reefs, can be as productive as forests, generating similar amounts of new biomass each year on a given area. [2]

Biomass is the mass of living biological organisms in a given area or ecosystem at a given time. Biomass can refer to species biomass, which is the mass of one or more species, or to community biomass, which is the mass of all species in the community. It can include microorganisms, plants or animals. [3] The mass can be expressed as the average mass per unit area, or as the total mass in the community.

Contents

How biomass is measured depends on why it is being measured. Sometimes, the biomass is regarded as the natural mass of organisms in situ, just as they are. For example, in a salmon fishery, the salmon biomass might be regarded as the total wet weight the salmon would have if they were taken out of the water. In other contexts, biomass can be measured in terms of the dried organic mass, so perhaps only 30% of the actual weight might count, the rest being water. For other purposes, only biological tissues count, and teeth, bones and shells are excluded. In some applications, biomass is measured as the mass of organically bound carbon (C) that is present.

In 2018, Bar-On et al. estimated the total live biomass on Earth at about 550 billion (5.5×1011) tonnes C, [1] most of it in plants. In 1998 Field et.al. estimated the total annual net primary production of biomass at just over 100 billion tonnes C/yr. [4] The total live biomass of bacteria was once thought to be about the same as plants, [5] but recent studies suggest it is significantly less. [1] [6] [7] [8] [9] The total number of DNA base pairs on Earth, as a possible approximation of global biodiversity, is estimated at (5.3±3.6)×1037, and weighs 50 billion tonnes. [10] [11] Anthropogenic mass (human-made material) is expected to exceed all living biomass on earth at around the year 2020. [12]

Ecological pyramids

An energy pyramid illustrates how much energy is needed as it flows upward to support the next trophic level. Only about 10% of the energy transferred between each trophic level is converted to biomass. Ecological Pyramid.svg
An energy pyramid illustrates how much energy is needed as it flows upward to support the next trophic level. Only about 10% of the energy transferred between each trophic level is converted to biomass.

An ecological pyramid is a graphical representation that shows, for a given ecosystem, the relationship between biomass or biological productivity and trophic levels.

An ecological pyramid provides a snapshot in time of an ecological community.

The bottom of the pyramid represents the primary producers (autotrophs). The primary producers take energy from the environment in the form of sunlight or inorganic chemicals and use it to create energy-rich molecules such as carbohydrates. This mechanism is called primary production. The pyramid then proceeds through the various trophic levels to the apex predators at the top.

When energy is transferred from one trophic level to the next, typically only ten percent is used to build new biomass. The remaining ninety percent goes to metabolic processes or is dissipated as heat. This energy loss means that productivity pyramids are never inverted, and generally limits food chains to about six levels. However, in oceans, biomass pyramids can be wholly or partially inverted, with more biomass at higher levels.

Terrestrial biomass

Relative terrestrial biomasses
of vertebrates versus arthropods Terrestrial biomass.jpg
     Relative terrestrial biomasses
of vertebrates versus arthropods

Terrestrial biomass generally decreases markedly at each higher trophic level (plants, herbivores, carnivores). Examples of terrestrial producers are grasses, trees and shrubs. These have a much higher biomass than the animals that consume them, such as deer, zebras and insects. The level with the least biomass are the highest predators in the food chain, such as foxes and eagles.

In a temperate grassland, grasses and other plants are the primary producers at the bottom of the pyramid. Then come the primary consumers, such as grasshoppers, voles and bison, followed by the secondary consumers, shrews, hawks and small cats. Finally the tertiary consumers, large cats and wolves. The biomass pyramid decreases markedly at each higher level.

Changes in plant species in the terrestrial ecosystem can result in changes in the biomass of soil decomposer communities. [13] Biomass in C3 and C4 plant species can change in response to altered concentrations of CO2. [14] C3 plant species have been observed to increase in biomass in response to increasing concentrations of CO2 of up to 900 ppm. [15]

Ocean biomass

Ocean or marine biomass, in a reversal of terrestrial biomass, can increase at higher trophic levels. In the ocean, the food chain typically starts with phytoplankton, and follows the course:

Phytoplankton → zooplankton → predatory zooplankton → filter feeders → predatory fish

Ocean food web showing a network of food chains Arctic food web.svg
Ocean food web showing a network of food chains
Biomass pyramids
Compared to terrestrial biomass pyramids, aquatic pyramids are inverted at the base Numbers Pyramid.svg
Biomass pyramids
Compared to terrestrial biomass pyramids, aquatic pyramids are inverted at the base
Prochlorococcus, an influential bacterium Prochlorococcus marinus (cropped).jpg
Prochlorococcus , an influential bacterium

Phytoplankton are the main primary producers at the bottom of the marine food chain. Phytoplankton use photosynthesis to convert inorganic carbon into protoplasm. They are then consumed by zooplankton that range in size from a few micrometers in diameter in the case of protistan microzooplankton to macroscopic gelatinous and crustacean zooplankton.

Zooplankton comprise the second level in the food chain, and includes small crustaceans, such as copepods and krill, and the larva of fish, squid, lobsters and crabs.

In turn, small zooplankton are consumed by both larger predatory zooplankters, such as krill, and by forage fish, which are small, schooling, filter-feeding fish. This makes up the third level in the food chain.

A fourth trophic level can consist of predatory fish, marine mammals and seabirds that consume forage fish. Examples are swordfish, seals and gannets.

Apex predators, such as orcas, which can consume seals, and shortfin mako sharks, which can consume swordfish, make up a fifth trophic level. Baleen whales can consume zooplankton and krill directly, leading to a food chain with only three or four trophic levels.

Marine environments can have inverted biomass pyramids. In particular, the biomass of consumers (copepods, krill, shrimp, forage fish) is larger than the biomass of primary producers. This happens because the ocean's primary producers are tiny phytoplankton which are r-strategists that grow and reproduce rapidly, so a small mass can have a fast rate of primary production. In contrast, terrestrial primary producers, such as forests, are K-strategists that grow and reproduce slowly, so a much larger mass is needed to achieve the same rate of primary production.

Among the phytoplankton at the base of the marine food web are members from a phylum of bacteria called cyanobacteria. Marine cyanobacteria include the smallest known photosynthetic organisms. The smallest of all, Prochlorococcus , is just 0.5 to 0.8 micrometres across. [16] In terms of individual numbers, Prochlorococcus is possibly the most plentiful species on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater can contain 100,000 cells or more. Worldwide, there are estimated to be several octillion (1027) individuals. [17] Prochlorococcus is ubiquitous between 40°N and 40°S and dominates in the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) regions of the oceans. [18] The bacterium accounts for an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere, and forms part of the base of the ocean food chain. [19]

Bacterial biomass

Bacteria and archaea are both classified as prokaryotes, and their biomass is commonly estimated together. The global biomass of prokaryotes is estimated at about 30 billion tonnes C, [20] dominated by bacteria. [1]

Geographic locationNumber of cells (× 1029)Billion tonnes of carbon
Open ocean
1.2 [1] [5]
1.6 [1] to 2.2 [5]
Ocean subsurface
5 [20]
10 [20]
Terrestrial soil
3 [1]
8 [1]
Terrestrial subsurface
2 to 6 [20]
4 to 12 [20]
Total
11 to 15 [20]
23 to 31 [20]

The estimates for the global biomass of prokaryotes had changed significantly over recent decades, as more data became available. A much-cited study from 1998 [5] collected data on abundances (number of cells) of bacteria and archaea in different natural environments, and estimated their total biomass at 350 to 550 billion tonnes C. This vast amount is similar to the biomass of carbon in all plants. [1] [5] The vast majority of bacteria and archaea were estimated to be in sediments deep below the seafloor or in the deep terrestrial biosphere (in deep continental aquifers). However, updated measurements reported in a 2012 study [6] reduced the calculated prokaryotic biomass in deep subseafloor sediments from the original ≈300 billion tonnes C to ≈4 billion tonnes C (range 1.5–22 billion tonnes). This update originates from much lower estimates of both the prokaryotic abundance and their average weight.

A census published in PNAS in May 2018 estimated global bacterial biomass at ≈70 billion tonnes C, of which ≈60 billion tonnes are in the terrestrial deep subsurface. [1] It also estimated the global biomass of archaea at ≈7 billion tonnes C. A later study by the Deep Carbon Observatory published in 2018 reported a much larger dataset of measurements, and updated the total biomass estimate in the deep terrestrial biosphere. It used this new knowledge and previous estimates to update the global biomass of bacteria and archaea to 23–31 billion tonnes C. [20] Roughly 70% of the global biomass was estimated to be found in the deep subsurface. [7] [21] The estimated number of prokaryotic cells globally was estimated to be 11–15 × 1029. [20] With this information, the authors of the May 2018 PNAS article [1] revised their estimate for the global biomass of prokaryotes to ≈30 billion tonnes C, [22] similar to the Deep Carbon Observatory estimate. [20]

These estimates convert global abundance of prokaryotes into global biomass using average cellular biomass figures that are based on limited data. Recent estimates used an average cellular biomass of about 20–30 femtogram carbon (fgC) per cell in the subsurface and terrestrial habitats. [1] [20] [23]

Global biomass

External image
Searchtool.svg Visualizing the biomass of life

The total global biomass has been estimated at about 550 billion tonnes C. [24] [1] A breakdown of the global biomass is given by kingdom in the table below, based on a 2018 study by Bar-On et. al. [1]

KingdomGlobal biomass in billion tonnes of carbonGlobal dry biomass in billion tonnesGlobal wet biomass in billion tonnesImage
450 [1]
900
2700
Browns Field rainforest NSW.jpg
60
200
E. coli Bacteria (7316101966).jpg
12 [1]
24
80
Mushroom-IMG 1469.JPG
4 [1]
8
25
Ammonia tepida.jpg
2 [1]
4
13
Great Barracuda off the Netherland Antilles.jpg
Total
500
1000
3000
Humans and their livestock represent 96% of all mammals on earth in terms of biomass, whereas all wild mammals represent only 4%. Distribution-of-earths-mammals.png
Humans and their livestock represent 96% of all mammals on earth in terms of biomass, whereas all wild mammals represent only 4%.

Animals represent less than 0.5% of the total biomass on Earth, with about 2 billion tonnes C in total. Most animal biomass is found in the oceans, where arthropods, such as copepods, account for about 1 billion tonnes C and fish for another 0.7 billion tonnes C. [1] Roughly half of the biomass of fish in the world are mesopelagic, such as lanternfish, [25] spending most of the day in the deep, dark waters. [26] Marine mammals such as whales and dolphins account for about 0.006 billion tonnes C. [27] Land animals account for about 500 million tonnes C, or about 20% of the biomass of animals on Earth. [1] Terrestrial arthropods account for about 150 million tonnes C, most of which is found in the topsoil. [28] Land mammals account for about 180 million tonnes C, most of which are humans (about 80 million tonnes C) and domesticated mammals (about 90 million tonnes C). Wild terrestrial mammals account for only about 3 million tonnes C, less than 2% of the total mammalian biomass on land. [27]

The global biomass broken down by kingdom and into taxonomic groups for animals. The estimates for bacteria and archaea have been updated to 30 billion tonnes C combined since this figure was made. Distribution of the global biomass.png
The global biomass broken down by kingdom and into taxonomic groups for animals. The estimates for bacteria and archaea have been updated to 30 billion tonnes C combined since this figure was made.

Most of the global biomass is found on land, with only 5 to 10 billion tonnes C found in the oceans. [24] On land, there is about 1,000 times more plant biomass (phytomass) than animal biomass (zoomass). [29] About 18% of this plant biomass is eaten by the land animals. [30] However, marine animals eat most of the marine autotrophs, and the biomass of marine animals is greater than that of marine autotrophs. [1] [30]

According to a 2020 study published in Nature , human-made materials, or anthropogenic mass, outweigh all living biomass on earth, with plastic alone exceeding the mass of all land and marine animals combined. [31] [12] [32]

namenumber of speciesdate of estimateindividual countmean living mass of individualpercent biomass (dried)global dry biomass in million tonnesglobal wet (fresh) biomass in million tonnes
Terrestrial
1
November 2022
8 billion [33]
50 kg
(incl children) [34]
40% [35]
160
400 [27]
2005
4.63 billion adults
62 kg
(excl. children) [36]
287 [36]
1
2021
1.5 billion [37]
300 kg
30%
125
416 [27]
1
2021
1.3 billion [37]
30 kg
30%
12
39 [27]
1
2021
1.1 billion [37]
30 kg
30%
10
32 [27]
1
2021
26 billion
0.9 kg for broilers, 1.8 kg for layers [38]
30%
8 [1]
25
15,700 [39]
2022
20-90×1015 [39]
3.7 mg [28] -5.5 mg [39]
22.8% [40]
10–100 [39]
40–450
7,000–30,000 [41]
2016
10 mg (dry weight) [42]
10–25% [43]
400 [1]
1,600
2022
2 mg [40]
27% [40]
100 [28] [44]
440 [45]
2019
4.4×1020 [46]
20% [40]
60
300 [46]
Marine
1
Pre-whaling
340,000
40% [48]
36
2023
50,000 [27]
60,000 kg
40% [48]
1.2
3 [27]
>20,000 [49]
2022
30% [50]
3,000
9,000 [26]
1
2008
7.8×1014 [51]
0.486 g [51]
379 (in peak season) [51]
13,000
10−6–10−9 kg
?
2003
1,000 [52]

Global rate of production

Globally, terrestrial and oceanic habitats produce a similar amount of new biomass each year (56.4 billion tonnes C terrestrial and 48.5 billion tonnes C oceanic). Seawifs global biosphere.jpg
Globally, terrestrial and oceanic habitats produce a similar amount of new biomass each year (56.4 billion tonnes C terrestrial and 48.5 billion tonnes C oceanic).

Net primary production is the rate at which new biomass is generated, mainly due to photosynthesis. Global primary production can be estimated from satellite observations. Satellites scan the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) over terrestrial habitats, and scan sea-surface chlorophyll levels over oceans. This results in 56.4 billion tonnes C/yr (53.8%), for terrestrial primary production, and 48.5 billion tonnes C/yr for oceanic primary production. [4] Thus, the total photoautotrophic primary production for the Earth is about 104.9 billion tonnes C/yr. This translates to about 426 gC/m2/yr for land production (excluding areas with permanent ice cover), and 140 gC/m2/yr for the oceans.

However, there is a much more significant difference in standing stocks—while accounting for almost half of total annual production, oceanic autotrophs account for only about 0.2% of the total biomass.

Terrestrial freshwater ecosystems generate about 1.5% of the global net primary production. [53]

Some global producers of biomass in order of productivity rates are

ProducerBiomass productivity
(gC/m2/yr)
RefTotal area
(million km2)
RefTotal production
(billion tonnes C/yr)
Swamps and marshes 2,500 [2] 5.7 [54]
Tropical rainforests 2,000 [55] 816
Coral reefs 2,000 [2] 0.28 [56] 0.56
Algal beds 2,000 [2]
River estuaries 1,800 [2]
Temperate forests 1,250 [2] 1924
Cultivated lands 650 [2] [57] 1711
Tundras 140 [2] [57] 11.5-29.8 [58] [59]
Open ocean 125 [2] [57] 31139
Deserts 3 [57] 500.15

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biosphere</span> Global sum of all ecosystems on Earth

The biosphere, also known as the ecosphere, is the worldwide sum of all ecosystems. It can also be termed the zone of life on Earth. The biosphere is virtually a closed system with regard to matter, with minimal inputs and outputs. Regarding energy, it is an open system, with photosynthesis capturing solar energy at a rate of around 100 terawatts. By the most general biophysiological definition, the biosphere is the global ecological system integrating all living beings and their relationships, including their interaction with the elements of the lithosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere. The biosphere is postulated to have evolved, beginning with a process of biopoiesis or biogenesis, at least some 3.5 billion years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon cycle</span> Natural processes of carbon exchange

The carbon cycle is that part of the biogeochemical cycle by which carbon is exchanged among the biosphere, pedosphere, geosphere, hydrosphere, and atmosphere of Earth. Other major biogeochemical cycles include the nitrogen cycle and the water cycle. Carbon is the main component of biological compounds as well as a major component of many minerals such as limestone. The carbon cycle comprises a sequence of events that are key to making Earth capable of sustaining life. It describes the movement of carbon as it is recycled and reused throughout the biosphere, as well as long-term processes of carbon sequestration (storage) to and release from carbon sinks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zooplankton</span> Heterotrophic protistan or metazoan members of the plankton ecosystem

Zooplankton are the animal component of the planktonic community, having to consume other organisms to thrive. Plankton are aquatic organisms that are unable to swim effectively against currents. Consequently, they drift or are carried along by currents in the ocean, or by currents in seas, lakes or rivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primary production</span> Synthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide by biological organisms

In ecology, primary production is the synthesis of organic compounds from atmospheric or aqueous carbon dioxide. It principally occurs through the process of photosynthesis, which uses light as its source of energy, but it also occurs through chemosynthesis, which uses the oxidation or reduction of inorganic chemical compounds as its source of energy. Almost all life on Earth relies directly or indirectly on primary production. The organisms responsible for primary production are known as primary producers or autotrophs, and form the base of the food chain. In terrestrial ecoregions, these are mainly plants, while in aquatic ecoregions algae predominate in this role. Ecologists distinguish primary production as either net or gross, the former accounting for losses to processes such as cellular respiration, the latter not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biological pump</span> Carbon capture process in oceans

The biological pump (or ocean carbon biological pump or marine biological carbon pump) is the ocean's biologically driven sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere and land runoff to the ocean interior and seafloor sediments. In other words, it is a biologically mediated process which results in the sequestering of carbon in the deep ocean away from the atmosphere and the land. The biological pump is the biological component of the "marine carbon pump" which contains both a physical and biological component. It is the part of the broader oceanic carbon cycle responsible for the cycling of organic matter formed mainly by phytoplankton during photosynthesis (soft-tissue pump), as well as the cycling of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) formed into shells by certain organisms such as plankton and mollusks (carbonate pump).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy flow (ecology)</span> Flow of energy through food chains in ecological energetics

Energy flow is the flow of energy through living things within an ecosystem. All living organisms can be organized into producers and consumers, and those producers and consumers can further be organized into a food chain. Each of the levels within the food chain is a trophic level. In order to more efficiently show the quantity of organisms at each trophic level, these food chains are then organized into trophic pyramids. The arrows in the food chain show that the energy flow is unidirectional, with the head of an arrow indicating the direction of energy flow; energy is lost as heat at each step along the way.

The mesopelagiczone, also known as the middle pelagic or twilight zone, is the part of the pelagic zone that lies between the photic epipelagic and the aphotic bathypelagic zones. It is defined by light, and begins at the depth where only 1% of incident light reaches and ends where there is no light; the depths of this zone are between approximately 200 to 1,000 meters below the ocean surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine life</span> Organisms that live in salt water

Marine life, sea life, or ocean life is the plants, animals, and other organisms that live in the salt water of seas or oceans, or the brackish water of coastal estuaries. At a fundamental level, marine life affects the nature of the planet. Marine organisms, mostly microorganisms, produce oxygen and sequester carbon. Marine life, in part, shape and protect shorelines, and some marine organisms even help create new land.

f-ratio (oceanography) In oceanic biogeochemistry, the fraction of total primary production fuelled by nitrate

In oceanic biogeochemistry, the f-ratio is the fraction of total primary production fuelled by nitrate. The ratio was originally defined by Richard Eppley and Bruce Peterson in one of the first papers estimating global oceanic production. This fraction was originally believed significant because it appeared to directly relate to the sinking (export) flux of organic marine snow from the surface ocean by the biological pump. However, this interpretation relied on the assumption of a strong depth-partitioning of a parallel process, nitrification, that more recent measurements has questioned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dissolved organic carbon</span> Organic carbon classification

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is the fraction of organic carbon operationally defined as that which can pass through a filter with a pore size typically between 0.22 and 0.7 micrometers. The fraction remaining on the filter is called particulate organic carbon (POC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gelatinous zooplankton</span> Fragile and often translucent animals that live in the water column

Gelatinous zooplankton are fragile animals that live in the water column in the ocean. Their delicate bodies have no hard parts and are easily damaged or destroyed. Gelatinous zooplankton are often transparent. All jellyfish are gelatinous zooplankton, but not all gelatinous zooplankton are jellyfish. The most commonly encountered organisms include ctenophores, medusae, salps, and Chaetognatha in coastal waters. However, almost all marine phyla, including Annelida, Mollusca and Arthropoda, contain gelatinous species, but many of those odd species live in the open ocean and the deep sea and are less available to the casual ocean observer. Many gelatinous plankters utilize mucous structures in order to filter feed. Gelatinous zooplankton have also been called Gelata.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine snow</span> Shower of organic detritus in the ocean

In the deep ocean, marine snow is a continuous shower of mostly organic detritus falling from the upper layers of the water column. It is a significant means of exporting energy from the light-rich photic zone to the aphotic zone below, which is referred to as the biological pump. Export production is the amount of organic matter produced in the ocean by primary production that is not recycled (remineralised) before it sinks into the aphotic zone. Because of the role of export production in the ocean's biological pump, it is typically measured in units of carbon. The term was coined by explorer William Beebe as observed from his bathysphere. As the origin of marine snow lies in activities within the productive photic zone, the prevalence of marine snow changes with seasonal fluctuations in photosynthetic activity and ocean currents. Marine snow can be an important food source for organisms living in the aphotic zone, particularly for organisms that live very deep in the water column.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacterioplankton</span> Bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column

Bacterioplankton refers to the bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column. The name comes from the Ancient Greek word πλανκτος, meaning "wanderer" or "drifter", and bacterium, a Latin term coined in the 19th century by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg. They are found in both seawater and freshwater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine microorganisms</span> Any life form too small for the naked human eye to see that lives in a marine environment

Marine microorganisms are defined by their habitat as microorganisms living in a marine environment, that is, in the saltwater of a sea or ocean or the brackish water of a coastal estuary. A microorganism is any microscopic living organism or virus, which is invisibly small to the unaided human eye without magnification. Microorganisms are very diverse. They can be single-celled or multicellular and include bacteria, archaea, viruses, and most protozoa, as well as some fungi, algae, and animals, such as rotifers and copepods. Many macroscopic animals and plants have microscopic juvenile stages. Some microbiologists also classify viruses as microorganisms, but others consider these as non-living.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lists of organisms by population</span>

This is a collection of lists of organisms by their population. While most of the numbers are estimates, they have been made by the experts in their fields. Species population is a science falling under the purview of population ecology and biogeography. Individuals are counted by census, as carried out for the piping plover; using the transect method, as done for the mountain plover; and beginning in 2012 by satellite, with the emperor penguin being first subject counted in this manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Particulate organic matter</span>

Particulate organic matter (POM) is a fraction of total organic matter operationally defined as that which does not pass through a filter pore size that typically ranges in size from 0.053 millimeters (53 μm) to 2 millimeters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Viral shunt</span>

The viral shunt is a mechanism that prevents marine microbial particulate organic matter (POM) from migrating up trophic levels by recycling them into dissolved organic matter (DOM), which can be readily taken up by microorganisms. The DOM recycled by the viral shunt pathway is comparable to the amount generated by the other main sources of marine DOM.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine food web</span> Marine consumer-resource system

Compared to terrestrial environments, marine environments have biomass pyramids which are inverted at the base. In particular, the biomass of consumers is larger than the biomass of primary producers. This happens because the ocean's primary producers are tiny phytoplankton which grow and reproduce rapidly, so a small mass can have a fast rate of primary production. In contrast, many significant terrestrial primary producers, such as mature forests, grow and reproduce slowly, so a much larger mass is needed to achieve the same rate of primary production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine viruses</span> Viruses found in marine environments

Marine viruses are defined by their habitat as viruses that are found in marine environments, that is, in the saltwater of seas or oceans or the brackish water of coastal estuaries. Viruses are small infectious agents that can only replicate inside the living cells of a host organism, because they need the replication machinery of the host to do so. They can infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine prokaryotes</span> Marine bacteria and marine archaea

Marine prokaryotes are marine bacteria and marine archaea. They are defined by their habitat as prokaryotes that live in marine environments, that is, in the saltwater of seas or oceans or the brackish water of coastal estuaries. All cellular life forms can be divided into prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Eukaryotes are organisms whose cells have a nucleus enclosed within membranes, whereas prokaryotes are the organisms that do not have a nucleus enclosed within a membrane. The three-domain system of classifying life adds another division: the prokaryotes are divided into two domains of life, the microscopic bacteria and the microscopic archaea, while everything else, the eukaryotes, become the third domain.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (June 2018). "The biomass distribution on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (25): 6506–6511. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.6506B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711842115 . PMC   6016768 . PMID   29784790.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ricklefs RE, Miller GL (2000). Ecology (4th ed.). Macmillan. p. 192. ISBN   978-0-7167-2829-0.
  3. IUPAC , Compendium of Chemical Terminology , 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006) " biomass ". doi : 10.1351/goldbook.B00660
  4. 1 2 Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (July 1998). "Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components". Science. 281 (5374): 237–40. Bibcode:1998Sci...281..237F. doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237. PMID   9657713.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (June 1998). "Prokaryotes: the unseen majority" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (12): 6578–83. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.6578W. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 . PMC   33863 . PMID   9618454.
  6. 1 2 Kallmeyer J, Pockalny R, Adhikari RR, Smith DC, D'Hondt S (October 2012). "Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (40): 16213–6. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10916213K. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203849109 . PMC   3479597 . PMID   22927371.
  7. 1 2 Deep Carbon Observatory (10 December 2018). "Life in deep Earth totals 15 to 23 billion tons of carbon -- hundreds of times more than humans - Deep Carbon Observatory collaborators, exploring the 'Galapagos of the deep,' add to what's known, unknown, and unknowable about Earth's most pristine ecosystem". EurekAlert! . Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  8. Dockrill, Peter (11 December 2018). "Scientists Reveal a Massive Biosphere of Life Hidden Under Earth's Surface". Science Alert. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  9. Gabbatiss, Josh (11 December 2018). "Massive 'deep life' study reveals billions of tonnes of microbes living far beneath Earth's surface". The Independent . Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  10. Landenmark HK, Forgan DH, Cockell CS (June 2015). "An Estimate of the Total DNA in the Biosphere". PLOS Biology. 13 (6): e1002168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002168 . PMC   4466264 . PMID   26066900.
  11. Nuwer R (18 July 2015). "Counting All the DNA on Earth". The New York Times. New York. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 18 July 2015.
  12. 1 2 Elhacham, Emily; Ben-Uri, Liad; et al. (2020). "Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass". Nature . 588 (7838): 442–444. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..442E. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5. PMID   33299177. S2CID   228077506.
  13. Spehn, Eva M.; Joshi, Jasmin; Schmid, Bernhard; Alphei, Jörn; Körner, Christian (2000). "Plant diversity effects on soil heterotrophic activity in experimental grassland ecosystems". Plant and Soil. 224 (2): 217–230. doi:10.1023/A:1004891807664. S2CID   25639544.
  14. He, Jin-Sheng; Bazzaz, Fakhri A.; Schmid, Bernhard (2002). "Interactive Effects of Diversity, Nutrients and Elevated CO2 on Experimental Plant Communities". Oikos. 97 (3): 337–348. Bibcode:2002Oikos..97..337H. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970304.x. ISSN   0030-1299. JSTOR   3547655.
  15. Drag, David W; Slattery, Rebecca; Siebers, Matthew; DeLucia, Evan H; Ort, Donald R; Bernacchi, Carl J (12 March 2020). "Soybean photosynthetic and biomass responses to carbon dioxide concentrations ranging from pre-industrial to the distant future". Journal of Experimental Botany. 71 (12). Oxford University Press (OUP): 3690–3700. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa133. ISSN   0022-0957. PMC   7475242 . PMID   32170296.
  16. Kettler GC, Martiny AC, Huang K, Zucker J, Coleman ML, Rodrigue S, Chen F, Lapidus A, Ferriera S, Johnson J, Steglich C, Church GM, Richardson P, Chisholm SW (December 2007). "Patterns and implications of gene gain and loss in the evolution of Prochlorococcus". PLOS Genetics. 3 (12): e231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030231 . PMC   2151091 . PMID   18159947.
  17. Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (27 September 2006). "Earth from Saturn". Astronomy Picture of the Day . NASA.
  18. Partensky F, Hess WR, Vaulot D (March 1999). "Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 63 (1): 106–27. doi:10.1128/MMBR.63.1.106-127.1999. PMC   98958 . PMID   10066832.
  19. "The Most Important Microbe You've Never Heard Of". npr.org.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Magnabosco, C.; Lin, L.-H.; Dong, H.; Bomberg, M.; Ghiorse, W.; Stan-Lotter, H.; Pedersen, K.; Kieft, T. L.; van Heerden, E.; Onstott, T. C. (24 September 2018). "The biomass and biodiversity of the continental subsurface". Nature Geoscience. 11 (10): 707–717. Bibcode:2018NatGe..11..707M. doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0221-6. ISSN   1752-0908. S2CID   133768246.
  21. Observatory, Deep Carbon. "Life in deep Earth totals 15 to 23 billion tons of carbon—hundreds of times more than humans". phys.org. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
  22. 1 2 Bar-On, Yinon M.; Milo, Ron (21 February 2019). "Towards a quantitative view of the global ubiquity of biofilms". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 17 (4): 199–200. doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0162-0. ISSN   1740-1534. PMID   30792541. S2CID   67789580.
  23. Griebler, Christian; Mindl, Birgit; Slezak, Doris; Geiger-Kaiser, Margot (26 June 2002). "Distribution patterns of attached and suspended bacteria in pristine and contaminated shallow aquifers studied with an in situ sediment exposure microcosm". Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 28 (2): 117–129. doi: 10.3354/ame028117 . ISSN   0948-3055.
  24. 1 2 Groombridge B, Jenkins MD (2000) Global biodiversity: Earth’s living resources in the 21st century Page 11. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, World Conservation Press, Cambridge
  25. Schwarzhans, Werner; Carnevale, Giorgio (19 March 2021). "The rise to dominance of lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophidae) in the oceanic ecosystems: a paleontological perspective". Paleobiology. 47 (3): 446–463. Bibcode:2021Pbio...47..446S. doi: 10.1017/pab.2021.2 . ISSN   0094-8373. S2CID   233678539.
  26. 1 2 Hatton, Ian A.; Heneghan, Ryan F.; Bar-On, Yinon M.; Galbraith, Eric D. (12 November 2021). "The global ocean size spectrum from bacteria to whales". Science Advances. 7 (46): eabh3732. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.3732H. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh3732. ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   8580314 . PMID   34757796.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Greenspoon, Lior; Krieger, Eyal; Sender, Ron; Rosenberg, Yuval; Bar-On, Yinon M.; Moran, Uri; Antman, Tomer; Meiri, Shai; Roll, Uri; Noor, Elad; Milo, Ron (7 March 2023). "The global biomass of wild mammals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (10): e2204892120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12004892G. doi:10.1073/pnas.2204892120. ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   10013851 . PMID   36848563.
  28. 1 2 3 Rosenberg, Yuval; Bar-On, Yinon M.; Fromm, Amir; Ostikar, Meital; Shoshany, Aviv; Giz, Omer; Milo, Ron (3 February 2023). "The global biomass and number of terrestrial arthropods". Science Advances. 9 (5): eabq4049. Bibcode:2023SciA....9.4049R. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq4049. ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   9897674 . PMID   36735788.
  29. Gosh, Iman (20 August 2021). "Misc All the Biomass of Earth, in One Graphic". Visual Capitalist. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  30. 1 2 Hartley, Sue (2010) The 300 Million Years War: Plant Biomass v Herbivores Royal Institution Christmas Lecture .
  31. Laville, Sandra (9 December 2020). "Human-made materials now outweigh Earth's entire biomass – study". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
  32. "Anthropogenic mass: Comparing human-made mass to the living Biomass on earth". Anthropogenic mass: Comparing human-made mass to the living Biomass on earth. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  33. Nations, United. "Day of 8 Billion". United Nations. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
  34. Hern, Warren M. (September 1999). "How Many Times Has the Human Population Doubled? Comparisons with Cancer". Population and Environment. 21 (1): 59–80. doi:10.1007/BF02436121. JSTOR   27503685. S2CID   86671730 via JSTOR.
  35. Jéquier, E.; Constant, F. (February 2010). "Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration". European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 64 (2): 115–123. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.111. ISSN   1476-5640. PMID   19724292. S2CID   205129670.
  36. 1 2 Walpole SC, Prieto-Merino D, Edwards P, Cleland J, Stevens G, Roberts I (June 2012). "The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass". BMC Public Health. 12 (1): 439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-439 . PMC   3408371 . PMID   22709383.
  37. 1 2 3 "FAOSTAT". www.fao.org. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
  38. IPCC 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan.
  39. 1 2 3 4 Schultheiss, Patrick; Nooten, Sabine; Wang, Runxi; Wong, Mark; Brassard, François; Benoit, Guénard (19 September 2022). "The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (40): e2201550119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11901550S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201550119 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   9546634 . PMID   36122199.
  40. 1 2 3 4 Petersen, Henning; Luxton, Malcolm (December 1982). "A Comparative Analysis of Soil Fauna Populations and Their Role in Decomposition Processes". Oikos. 39 (3): 288–388. Bibcode:1982Oikos..39..288P. doi:10.2307/3544689. JSTOR   3544689 . Retrieved 26 July 2023.
  41. Joint Research Centre (European Commission); Johnson, Nancy C.; Scheu, Stefan; Ramirez, Kelly S.; Lemanceau, Philippe; Eggleton, Paul; Jones, Arwyn; Moreira, Fatima M. S.; Barrios, Edmundo (2016). Global soil biodiversity atlas. LU: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2788/2613. ISBN   978-92-79-48168-0.
  42. Fierer, Noah; Strickland, Michael S.; Liptzin, Daniel; Bradford, Mark A.; Cleveland, Cory C. (13 October 2009). "Global patterns in belowground communities". Ecology Letters. 12 (11): 1238–1249. Bibcode:2009EcolL..12.1238F. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01360.x. PMID   19674041.
  43. Edwards, Clive A.; Normal, Arancon Q. (27 April 2022). "Earthworm Physiology". Biology and Ecology of Earthworms (4 ed.). New York, NY: Springer. pp. 33–54. ISBN   978-0-387-74943-3.
  44. Tuma, Jiri; Eggleton, Paul; Fayle, Tom M. (25 December 2019). "Ant-termite interactions: an important but under-explored ecological linkage". Biological Reviews. 95 (3): 555–572. doi:10.1111/brv.12577. ISSN   1464-7931. PMID   31876057. S2CID   209482348.
  45. Sum of [(biomass m22)*(area m2)] from table 3 in Sanderson, M.G. 1996 Biomass of termites and their emissions of methane and carbon dioxide: A global database Global Biochemical Cycles, Vol 10:4 543-557
  46. 1 2 "Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale". Nature. 572 (7768): 194–198. 8 August 2019. Bibcode:2019Natur.572..194V. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1418-6. hdl: 10261/193342 . PMID   31341281.
  47. Pershing AJ, Christensen LB, Record NR, Sherwood GD, Stetson PB (August 2010). Humphries S (ed.). "The impact of whaling on the ocean carbon cycle: why bigger was better". PLOS ONE. 5 (8): e12444. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...512444P. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012444 . PMC   2928761 . PMID   20865156. (Table 1)
  48. 1 2 Jelmert A, Oppen-Berntsen DO (1996). "Whaling and Deep-Sea Biodiversity". Conservation Biology. 10 (2): 653–654. Bibcode:1996ConBi..10..653J. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020653.x.
  49. Fisheries, NOAA (3 May 2022). "Fun Facts About Fascinating Fish | NOAA Fisheries". NOAA. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  50. Johnson, Brett M.; Pate, William M.; Hansen, Adam G. (2017). "Energy Density and Dry Matter Content in Fish: New Observations and an Evaluation of Some Empirical Models". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 146 (6): 1262–1278. Bibcode:2017TrAFS.146.1262J. doi:10.1080/00028487.2017.1360392.
  51. 1 2 3 Atkinson A, Siegel V, Pakhomov EA, Jessopp MJ, Loeb V (2009). "A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill" (PDF). Deep-Sea Research Part I. 56 (5): 727–740. Bibcode:2009DSRI...56..727A. doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2008.12.007.
  52. Garcia-Pichel F, Belnap J, Neuer S, Schanz F (2003). "Estimates of global cyanobacterial biomass and its distribution" (PDF). Algological Studies. 109: 213–217. doi:10.1127/1864-1318/2003/0109-0213.
  53. Alexander DE (1 May 1999). Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Springer. ISBN   978-0-412-74050-3.
  54. "What are wetlands?" (PDF). ramsar.org. Retrieved 28 August 2023.
  55. Ricklefs RE, Miller GL (2000). Ecology (4th ed.). Macmillan. p. 197. ISBN   978-0-7167-2829-0.
  56. Mark Spalding, Corinna Ravilious, and Edmund Green. 2001. World Atlas of Coral Reefs. Berkeley, California: University of California Press and UNEP/WCMC.
  57. 1 2 3 4 Park CC (2001). The environment: principles and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge. p. 564. ISBN   978-0-415-21770-5.
  58. "Tundra - Biomes - WWF". World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  59. "Tundra". ArcGIS StoryMaps. 17 January 2020. Retrieved 5 October 2021. the tundra is a vast and treeless land which covers about 20% of the Earth's surface, circumnavigating the North pole.

Further reading