Economy of Denmark

Last updated

Economy of Denmark
Copenhagen aerial view by night.jpg
Currency Danish krone (DKK, kr)
calendar year
Trade organisations
EU, WTO, OECD and others
Country group
Statistics
Population5,961,249 (January 2024) [4]
GDP
  • $410 billion (nominal, 2024) [5]
  • $462 billion (PPP, 2024) [5]
GDP rank
GDP growth
  • 1.8% (2023)
  • 2.1% (2024)
  • 1.5% (2025) [5]
GDP per capita
  • $68,898 (nominal, 2024) [5]
  • $77,641 (PPP, 2024) [5]
GDP per capita rank
GDP by sector
  • agriculture: 1.6%
  • mining and quarrying: 1.2%
  • industry: 14.4%
  • utilities and construction: 7.7%
  • services: 75.2%
  • (2017) [6]
  • 3.4% (2023)
  • 1.5% (2024)
  • 2.0% (2025) [5]
Population below poverty line
  • 4% in poverty (2021) [7]
  • 17.9% at risk of poverty or social exclusion (AROPE 2023) [8]
28.2 low (2023) [9]
90 out of 100 points (2023) [11] (1st)
Labour force
  • 3,132,170 (2022) [12]
  • 79.8% employment rate (2023) [13]
Labour force by occupation
  • agriculture: 2.4%
  • mining and quarrying: 0.1%
  • industry: 10.7%
  • utilities and construction: 6.7%
  • services: 79.9%
  • (2017) [14]
Unemployment
  • 2.5% (January 2022) [15]
  • 12.2% youth unemployment (15 to 24 year-olds; July 2020) [16]
Average gross salary
DKK 45,482 / €6,107 monthly (2021)
DKK 30,971 / €4,159 monthly (2021)
Main industries
wind turbines, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, shipbuilding and refurbishment, iron, steel, nonferrous metals, chemicals, food processing, machinery and transportation equipment, textiles and clothing, electronics, LEGO, construction, furniture and other wood products
External
Exports$234.2 billion (2021) [3]
Export goods
wind turbines, pharmaceuticals, machinery and instruments, meat and meat products, dairy products, fish, furniture and design
Main export partners
  • Germany 14.0%
  • Sweden 10.0%
  • United States 10.0%
  • China 6.0%
  • Norway 5.0%
  • (2021) [3]
Imports$208.1 billion (2021 est.) [3]
Import goods
machinery and equipment, raw materials and semimanufactures for industry, chemicals, grain and foodstuffs, consumer goods
Main import partners
  • Germany 21%
  • Sweden 12%
  • China 9%
  • Netherlands 8%
  • Poland 4.0%
  • (2021) [3]
FDI stock
  • $188.7 billion (2017) [3]
  • Abroad: $287.9 billion (2017) [3]
$32.4 billion (2021 est.) [3]
$484.8 billion (2016) [3]
64.6% of GDP (1 July 2018) [17]
Public finances
  • 33.2% of GDP (2019) [18]
  • DKK 770.832 billion (2019) [18]
  • DKK 84.9 billion surplus (2019) [18]
  • +3.7% of GDP (2019) [18]
Revenues53.3% of GDP (2019) [18]
Expenses49.6% of GDP (2019) [18]
Economic aid
$75.25 billion (2017) [3]
All values, unless otherwise stated, are in US dollars.

Denmark is a modern high-income and highly developed mixed economy, dominated by the service sector with 80% of all jobs; about 11% of employees work in manufacturing and 2% in agriculture. The nominal Gross National Income per capita was the ninth-highest in the world at $68,827 in 2023.

Contents

Correcting for purchasing power, per capita income was Int$57,781 or 10th-highest globally. [23] The income distribution is relatively equal but inequality has somewhat increased during the last decades. [24] In 2017, Denmark had the seventh-lowest Gini coefficient (a measure of economic inequality) of the then 28 European Union countries. [25] With 5,932,654 inhabitants (1 January 2023), [26] Denmark has the 38th largest national economy in the world measured by nominal gross domestic product (GDP), and the 52nd largest in the world measured by purchasing power parity (PPP). Among OECD nations, Denmark has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 26.2% of GDP. [27] [28] [29]

Denmark has a very long tradition of adhering to a fixed exchange-rate system and still does so today. It is unique among OECD countries to do so while maintaining an independent currency: the Danish Krone, which is pegged to the Euro. [30] Though eligible to join the EU's Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), Danish voters in a referendum in 2000 rejected exchanging the krone for the euro. Whereas Denmark's neighbours like Norway, Sweden, Poland and the United Kingdom generally follow inflation targeting in their monetary policy, the priority of Denmark's central bank is to maintain exchange rate stability. Consequently, the central bank has no role in a domestic stabilization policy.

In an international context, a relatively large proportion of the population is part of the labour force, in particular because the female participation rate is very high. 78.8% of all 15-to-64-year-olds were active on the labour market in 2017, the sixth-highest number among all OECD countries. With a 4.8% unemployment rate, unemployment is relatively low in comparison to other European countries, where the average unemployment rate is 6.7%. [31] The labour market is traditionally characterized by a high degree of union membership rates and collective agreement coverage. Denmark invests heavily in active labor market policies and the concept of flexicurity has been important historically.

Denmark is an example of the Nordic model, characterized by an internationally high tax level, and a correspondingly high level of government-provided services (e.g. health care, child care and education services). There are also income transfers to various groups, such as retirees, disabled people, the unemployed, and students. Altogether, the amount of revenue from taxes paid in 2017 amounted to 46.1% of GDP. The Danish fiscal policy is generally considered healthy. The net government debt is very close to zero, amounting to 1.3% of GDP in 2017. The Danish fiscal policy is characterized by a long-term outlook, taking into account likely future fiscal demands. During the 2000s, a challenge was perceived to government expenditures in future decades. It was ultimately a challenge to fiscal sustainability from demographic development, in particular higher longevity. Responding to this, age eligibility rules for receiving public age-related transfers were changed. Since 2012, calculations of future fiscal challenges, from both the government and independent analysts, have generally perceived Danish fiscal policy to be sustainable. In recent years, it was considered overly sustainable.

History

Development of real GDP per capita, 1820 to 2018 GDP per capita development in Denmark.jpg
Development of real GDP per capita, 1820 to 2018

Denmark's long-term economic development has largely followed the same pattern as other Northwestern European countries. In most of recorded history Denmark has been an agricultural country with most of the population living on a subsistence level. Since the 19th century Denmark has gone through an intense technological and institutional development. The material standard of living has experienced formerly unknown rates of growth, and the country has been industrialized and later turned into a modern service society.

Almost all of the land area of Denmark is arable. Unlike most of its neighbours, Denmark has not had extractable deposits of minerals or fossil fuels, except for the deposits of oil and natural gas in the North Sea, which started playing an economic role only during the 1980s. On the other hand, Denmark has had a logistic advantage through its long coastal line and the fact that no point on Danish land is more than 50 kilometers from the sea – an important fact for the whole period before the industrial revolution when sea transport was cheaper than land transport. [32] Consequently, foreign trade has always been very important for the economic development of Denmark.

Danish silver penning from the time of Valdemar I of Denmark. Penning - dannebrogsmont - Kmm 0034.jpg
Danish silver penning from the time of Valdemar I of Denmark.

Already during the Stone Age there was some foreign trade, [33] and even though trade has made up only a very modest share of total Danish value added until the 19th century, it has been decisive for economic development, both in terms of procuring vital import goods (like metals) and because new knowledge and technological skills have often come to Denmark as a byproduct of goods exchange with other countries. The emerging trade implied specialization which created demand for means of payments, and the earliest known Danish coins date from the time of Svend Tveskæg around 995. [34]

Count Otto Thott was the foremost representative of mercantilist thought in Denmark. Otto Thott.jpg
Count Otto Thott was the foremost representative of mercantilist thought in Denmark.

Improvements in shipping technology allowed traders to sail around Jutland and into the Baltic Sea directly, and Danish warships collected the Sound Toll from these mainly Dutch merchants, in exchange for protection. Nordic rulers before the mid-seventeenth century welcomed the Dutch merchants for their efficient shipping services and inflow of investments which boosted industrial development. [35] According to economic historian Angus Maddison, Denmark was the sixth-most prosperous country in the world around 1600. The population size relative to arable agricultural land was small so that the farmers were relatively affluent, and Denmark was geographically close to the most dynamic and economically leading European areas since the 16th century: the Netherlands, the northern parts of Germany, and Britain. Still, 80 to 85% of the population lived in small villages on a subsistence level. [32]

Mercantilism was the leading economic doctrine during the 17th and 18th century in Denmark, [36] leading to the establishment of monopolies like Asiatisk Kompagni, development of physical and financial infrastructure like the first Danish bank Kurantbanken in 1736 and the first "kreditforening" (a kind of building society) in 1797, and the acquisition of some minor Danish colonies like Tranquebar. [37]

At the end of the 18th century major agricultural reforms took place that entailed decisive structural changes. [32] [38] However, the Napoleonic Wars caused Copenhagen to lose its status as an international centre of finance and trade. [39] Politically, mercantilism was gradually replaced by liberal thoughts among the ruling elite. Following a monetary reform after the Napoleonic wars, the present Danish central bank Danmarks Nationalbank was founded in 1818.

There exists national accounting data for Denmark from 1820 onwards thanks to the pioneering work of Danish economic historian Svend Aage Hansen. [40] They find that there has been a substantial and permanent, though fluctuating, economic growth all the time since 1820. The period 1822–94 saw on average an annual growth in factor incomes of 2% (0.9% per capita) From around 1830 the agricultural sector experienced a major boom lasting several decades, producing and exporting grains, not least to Britain after 1846 when British grain import duties were abolished. When grain production became less profitable in the second half of the century, the Danish farmers made an impressive and uniquely successful change from vegetarian to animal production leading to a new boom period. [32] Parallelly industrialization took off in Denmark from the 1870s. At the turn of the century industry (including artisanry) fed almost 30% of the population. [41]

During the 20th century agriculture slowly dwindled in importance relative to industry, [38] but agricultural employment was only during the 1950s surpassed by industrial employment. The first half of the century was marked by the two world wars and the Great Depression during the 1930s. After World War II Denmark took part in the increasingly close international cooperation, joining OEEC/OECD, IMF, GATT/WTO, and from 1972 the European Economic Community, later European Union. Foreign trade increased heavily relative to GDP. The economic role of the public sector increased considerably, and the country was increasingly transformed from an industrial country to a country dominated by production of services. The years 1958–73 were an unprecedented high-growth period. The 1960s are the decade with the highest registered real per capita growth in GDP ever, i.e. 4.5% annually. [42]

As a chairman of the Danish Economic Council and of several policy-preparing commissions, Professor Torben M. Andersen has played an important role in Danish economic policy debates for the last decades. Torben M. Andersen professor i nationalekonomi arhus universitet pa konferensen Fiscal consequences of the crises, som anornades av de nordiska finansministrarna 2010-03-22.jpg
As a chairman of the Danish Economic Council and of several policy-preparing commissions, Professor Torben M. Andersen has played an important role in Danish economic policy debates for the last decades.

During the 1970s Denmark was plunged into a crisis, initiated by the 1973 oil crisis leading to the hitherto unknown phenomenon stagflation. For the next decades the Danish economy struggled with several major so-called "balance problems": High unemployment, current account deficits, inflation, and government debt. From the 1980s economic policies have increasingly been oriented towards a long-term perspective, and gradually a series of structural reforms have solved these problems. In 1994 active labour market policies were introduced that via a series of labour market reforms have helped reducing structural unemployment considerably. [43] A series of tax reforms from 1987 onwards, reducing tax deductions on interest payments, and the increasing importance of compulsory labour market-based funded pensions from the 1990s have increased private savings rates considerably, consequently transforming secular current account deficits to secular surpluses. The announcement of a consistent and hence more credible fixed exchange rate in 1982 has helped reducing the inflation rate.

In the first decade of the 21st century new economic policy issues have emerged. A growing awareness that future demographic changes, in particular increasing longevity, could threaten fiscal sustainability, implying very large fiscal deficits in future decades, led to major political agreements in 2006 and 2011, both increasing the future eligibility age of receiving public age-related pensions. Mainly because of these changes, from 2012 onwards the Danish fiscal sustainability problem is generally considered to be solved. [44] Instead, issues like decreasing productivity growth rates and increasing inequality in income distribution and consumption possibilities are prevalent in the public debate.

The global Great Recession during the late 2000s, the accompanying Euro area debt crisis and their repercussions marked the Danish economy for several years. Until 2017, unemployment rates have generally been considered to be above their structural level, implying a relatively stagnating economy from a business-cycle point of view. From 2017/18 this is no longer considered to be the case, and attention has been redirected to the need of avoiding a potential overheating situation.

In 2022 the popularity of Novo Nordisk's Ozempic and Wegovy for weight loss began greatly affecting the Danish economy. The pharmaceutical industry contributed two thirds of growth that year, and 1.7 points of the 1.9% year-over-year growth in the first quarter of 2023. As of August 2023 Novo Nordisk's market capitalization—Europe's second-largest, after LVMH—exceeded the size of the entire national economy, and it is the largest payer of corporate taxes to the Danish state. Economists discussed whether the government needed to publish data including and excluding the company; as the enormous economic growth did not similarly increase employment, data including Novo Nordisk is misleading regarding the Danish business cycle. Some worried that the nation might become overdependent on the company, similar to what happened to the economy of Finland with Nokia, or that Novo Nordisk's success might cause Dutch disease. [45]

Income, wealth and income distribution

Average per capita income is high in an international context. According to the World Bank, gross national income per capita was the tenth-highest in the world at $55,220 in 2017. Correcting for purchasing power, income was Int$52,390 or 16th-highest among the 187 countries. [23]

During the last three decades household saving rates in Denmark have increased considerably. This is to a large extent caused by two major institutional changes: A series of tax reforms from 1987 to 2009 considerably reduced the effective subsidization of private debt implicit in the rules for tax deductions of household interest payments. Secondly, compulsory funded pension schemes became normal for most employees from the 1990s. [46] Over the years, the wealth of the Danish pension funds have accumulated so that in 2016 it constituted twice the size of Denmark's GDP. [47] The pension wealth consequently is a very important both for the life-cycle of a typical individual Danish household and for the national economy. A large part of the pension wealth is invested abroad, thus giving rise to a fair amount of foreign capital income. In 2015, average household assets were more than 600% of their disposable income, among OECD countries second only to the Netherlands. At the same time, average household gross debt was almost 300% of disposable income, which is also at the highest level in OECD. Household balance sheets are consequently very large in Denmark compared to most other countries. Danmarks Nationalbank, the Danish central bank, has attributed this to a well-developed financial system. [48]

Income inequality

Income inequality has traditionally been low in Denmark. According to OECD figures, in 2000 Denmark had the lowest Gini coefficient of all countries. [49] However, inequality has increased during the last decades. According to data from Statistics Denmark, the Gini coefficient for disposable income has increased from 22.1 in 1987 to 29.3 in 2017. [50] The Danish Economic Council found in an analysis from 2016 that the increasing inequality in Denmark is due to several components: Pre-tax labour income is more unequally distributed today than before, capital income, which is generally less equally distributed than labour income, has increased as share of total income, and economic policy is less redistributive today, both because public income transfers play a smaller role today and because the tax system has become less progressive. [24]

In international comparisons, Denmark has a relatively equal income distribution. According to the CIA World Factbook, Denmark had the twentieth-lowest Gini coefficient (29.0) of 158 countries in 2016. [51] According to data from Eurostat, Denmark was the EU country with the seventh-lowest Gini coefficient in 2017. Slovakia, Slovenia, Czechia, Finland, Belgium and the Netherlands had a lower Gini coefficient for disposable income than Denmark. [25]

Labour market and employment

The Danish labour market is characterized by a high degree of union membership rates and collective agreement coverage dating back from Septemberforliget (The September Settlement) in 1899 when the Danish Confederation of Trade Unions and the Confederation of Danish Employers recognized each other's right to organise and negotiate. The labour market is also traditionally characterized by a high degree of flexicurity, i.e. a combination of labour market flexibility and economic security for workers. [52] The degree of flexibility is in part maintained through active labour market policies. Denmark first introduced active labour market policies (ALMPs) in the 1990s after an economic recession that resulted in high unemployment rates. [53] Its labour market policies are decided through tripartite cooperation between employers, employees and the government. [54] Denmark has one of the highest expenditures on ALMPs and in 2005, spent about 1.7% of its GDP on labour market policies. [55] This was the highest amongst the OECD countries. Similarly, in 2010 Denmark was ranked number one amongst Nordic countries for expenditure on ALMPs. [56]

Denmark's active labour market policies particularly focus on tackling youth unemployment. They have had a "youth initiative" or the Danish Youth Unemployment Programme in place since 1996. [57] This includes mandatory activation for those unemployed under the age of 30. While unemployment benefits are provided, the policies are designed to motivate job-seeking. For example, unemployment benefits decrease by 50% after 6 months. [58] This is combined with education, skill development and work training programs. For instance, the Building Bridge to Education program was started in 2014 to provide mentors and skill development classes to youth that are at risk of unemployment. [59] Such active labour market policies have been successful for Denmark in the short-term and the long-term. For example, 80% of participants in the Building Bridge for Education program felt that "the initiative has helped them to move towards completing an education". [59] On a more macro scale, a study of the impact of ALMPs in Denmark between 1995 and 2005 showed that such policies had positive impact not just on employment but also on earnings. [54] The effective compensation rate for unemployed workers has been declining for the last decades, however. Unlike in most Western countries there is no legal minimum wage in Denmark.

A relatively large proportion of the population is active on the labour market, not least because of a very high female participation rate. The total participation rate for people aged 15 to 64 years was 78.8% in 2017. This was the 6th-highest number among OECD countries, only surpassed by Iceland, Switzerland, Sweden, New Zealand and the Netherlands. The average for all OECD countries together was 72.1%. [60]

According to Eurostat, the unemployment rate was 5.7% in 2017. This places unemployment in Denmark somewhat below the EU average, which was 7.6%. 10 EU member countries had a lower unemployment rate than Denmark in 2017. [61]

Altogether, total employment in 2017 amounted to 2,919,000 people according to Statistics Denmark. [62]

The share of employees leaving jobs every year (for a new job, retirement or unemployment) in the private sector is around 30% [63] – a level also observed in the U.K. and U.S.- but much higher than in continental Europe, where the corresponding figure is around 10%, and in Sweden. This attrition can be very costly, with new and old employees requiring half a year to return to old productivity levels, but with attrition bringing the number of people that have to be fired down. [64]

Foreign trade

As a small open economy, Denmark is very dependent on its foreign trade. In 2017, the value of total exports of goods and services made up 55% of GDP, whereas the value of total imports amounted to 47% of GDP. Trade in goods made up slightly more than 60% of both exports and imports, and trade in services the remaining close to 40%. [65]

Machinery, chemicals and related products like medicine and agricultural products were the largest groups of export goods in 2017. [66] Service exports were dominated by freight sea transport services from the Danish merchant navy. [67] Most of Denmark's most important trading partners are neighbouring countries. The five main importers of Danish goods and services in 2017 were Germany, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States and Norway. The five countries from which Denmark imported most goods and services in 2017 were Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, China and United Kingdom. [68]

After having almost consistently an external balance of payments current account deficit since the beginning of the 1960s, Denmark has maintained a surplus on its BOP current account for every year since 1990, with the single exception of 1998. In 2017, the current account surplus amounted to approximately 8% of GDP. [69] Consequently, Denmark has changed from a net debtor to a net creditor country. By 1 July 2018, the net foreign wealth or net international investment position of Denmark was equal to 64.6% of GDP, Denmark thus having the largest net foreign wealth relative to GDP of any EU country. [17]

As the annual current account is equal to the value of domestic saving minus total domestic investment, the change from a structural deficit to a structural surplus is due to changes in these two national account components. In particular, the Danish national saving rate in financial assets increased by 11 per cent of GDP from 1980 to 2015. Two main reasons for this large change in domestic saving behaviour were the growing importance of large-scale compulsory pension schemes and several Danish fiscal policy reforms during the period which considerably decreased tax deductions of household interest expense, thus reducing the tax subsidy to private debt. [46]

Currency and monetary policy

The building of Danmarks Nationalbank, the central bank of Denmark, built by the Danish architect Arne Jacobsen. Nationalbanken 1.jpg
The building of Danmarks Nationalbank, the central bank of Denmark, built by the Danish architect Arne Jacobsen.

The Danish currency is the Danish krone, subdivided into 100 øre. The krone and øre were introduced in 1875, replacing the former rigsdaler and skilling. [70] Denmark has a very long tradition of maintaining a fixed exchange-rate system, dating back to the period of the gold standard during the time of the Scandinavian Monetary Union from 1873 to 1914. After the breakdown of the international Bretton Woods system in 1971, Denmark devalued the krone repeatedly during the 1970s and the start of the 1980s, effectively maintaining a policy of "fixed, but adjustable" exchange rates. Rising inflation led to Denmark declaring a more consistent fixed exchange-rate policy in 1982. At first, the krone was pegged to the European Currency Unit or ECU, from 1987 to the Deutsche Mark, and from 1999 to the euro. [71]

Although eligible, Denmark chose not to join the European Monetary Union when it was founded. In 2000, the Danish government advocated Danish EMU membership and called a referendum to settle the issue. With a turn-out of 87.6%, 53% of the voters rejected Danish membership. Occasionally, the question of calling another referendum on the issue has been discussed, but since the Financial crisis of 2007–2008 opinion polls have shown a clear majority against Denmark joining the EMU, [72] and the question is not high on the political agenda presently.

Maintenance of the fixed exchange rate is the responsibility of Danmarks Nationalbank, the Danish central bank. As a consequence of the exchange rate policy, the bank must always adjust its interest rates to ensure a stable exchange rate and consequently cannot at the same time conduct monetary policy to stabilize e.g. domestic inflation or unemployment rates. This makes the conduct of stabilization policy fundamentally different from the situation in Denmark's neighbouring countries like Norway, Sweden, Poland and the United Kingdom, in which the central banks have a central stabilizing role. Denmark is presently the only OECD member country maintaining an independent currency with a fixed exchange rate. Consequently, the Danish krone is the only currency in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II), [73] before Bulgaria and Croatia joined in 2020 (the latter uses the euro since 2023) [74]

In the first months of 2015, Denmark experienced the largest pressure against the fixed exchange rate for many years because of very large capital inflows, causing a tendency for the Danish krone to appreciate. [73] Danmarks Nationalbank reacted in various ways, chiefly by lowering its interest rates to record low levels. On 6 February 2015 the certificates of deposit rate, one of the four official Danish central bank rates, was lowered to −0.75%. In January 2016 the rate was raised to −0.65%, at which level it has been maintained since then. [75]

Inflation in Denmark as measured by the official consumer price index of Statistics Denmark was 1.1% in 2017. [76] Inflation has generally been low and stable for the last decades. Whereas in 1980 annual inflation was more than 12%, in the period 2000–2017 the average inflation rate was 1.8%. [76]

Government

Overall organization

Since a local-government reform in 2007, the general government organization in Denmark is carried out on three administrative levels: central government, regions, and municipalities. Regions administer mainly health care services, whereas municipalities administer primary education and social services. Municipalities in principle independently levy income and property taxes, but the scope for total municipal taxation and expenditure is closely regulated by annual negotiations between the municipalities and the Finance Minister of Denmark. At the central government level, the Ministry of Finance carries out the coordinating role of conducting economic policy. In 2012, the Danish parliament passed a Budget Law (effective from January 2014) which governs the over-all fiscal framework, stating among other things that the structural deficit must never exceed 0.5% of GDP, [77] and that Danish fiscal policy is required to be sustainable, [78] i.e. have a non-negative fiscal sustainability indicator. The Budget Law also assigned the role of independent fiscal institution (IFI, informally known as "fiscal watchdog" [79] ) to the already-existing independent advisory body of the Danish Economic Councils. [77]

Budget and fiscal position

Danish fiscal policy is generally considered healthy. Government net debt was close to zero at the end of 2017, amounting to DKK 27.3 billion, or 1.3% of GDP. [80] [81] The government sector having a fair amount of financial assets as well as liabilities, government gross debt amounted to 36.1% of GDP at the same date. [82] The gross EMU-debt as percentage of GDP was the sixth-lowest among all 28 EU member countries, only Estonia, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Romania having a lower gross debt. [83] Denmark had a government budget surplus of 1.1% of GDP in 2017. [83]

Long-run annual fiscal projections from the Danish government as well as the independent Danish Economic Council, taking into account likely future fiscal developments caused by demographic developments etc. (e.g. a likely ageing of the population caused by a considerable expansion of life expectancy), consider the Danish fiscal policy to be overly sustainable in the long run. In Spring 2018, the so-called Fiscal Sustainability Indicator was calculated by the Danish government and the Danish Economic Council to be 1.2% and 0.9% of GDP, respectively. [84] [85] This implies that under the assumptions employed in the projections, fiscal policy could be permanently loosened (via more generous public expenditures and/or lower taxes) by c. 1% of GDP while still maintaining a stable government debt-to-GDP ratio in the long run.

Taxation

The tax level as well as the government expenditure level in Denmark ranks among the highest in the world, which is traditionally ascribed to the Nordic model of which Denmark is an example, including the welfare state principles which historically evolved during the 20th century. In 2022, the official Danish tax level amounted to 42.2% of GDP. [86] The all-record highest Danish tax level was 49.8% of GDP, [86] reached in 2014 because of high extraordinary one-time tax revenues caused by a reorganization of the Danish-funded pension system. The Danish tax-to-GDP-ratio of 42% was the seventh-highest among all OECD countries in 2022, after France, Norway, Austria, Finland, Italy and Belgium. [87] The OECD average was 34%. [88] The tax structure of Denmark (the relative weight of different taxes) also differs from the OECD average, as the Danish tax system in 2015 was characterized by substantially higher revenues from taxes on personal income, whereas on the other hand, no revenues at all derive from social security contributions. A lower proportion of revenues in Denmark derive from taxes on corporate income and gains and property taxes than in OECD generally, whereas the proportion deriving from payroll taxes, VAT, and other taxes on goods and services correspond to the OECD average. [88]

In 2016, the average marginal tax rate on labour income for all Danish tax-payers was 38.9%. The average marginal tax on personal capital income was 30.7%. [89]

Professor of Economics at Princeton University Henrik Kleven has suggested that three distinct policies in Denmark and its Scandinavian neighbours imply that the high tax rates cause only relatively small distortions to the economy:

in 2023, Denmark considered methods to increase taxes on energy dealers. [91]

Government Expenditures

Parallel to the high tax level, government expenditures make up a large part of GDP, and the government sector carries out many different tasks. By September 2018, 831,000 people worked in the general government sector, corresponding to 29.9% of all employees. [92] In 2017, total government expenditure amounted to 50.9% of GDP. Government consumption took up precisely 25% of GDP (e.g. education and health care expenditure), and government investment (infrastructure etc.) expenditure another 3.4% of GDP. Personal income transfers (for e.g. elderly or unemployed people) amounted to 16.8% of GDP. [84]

Denmark has an unemployment insurance system called the A-kasse (arbejdsløshedskasse). This system requires a paying membership of a state-recognized unemployment fund. Most of these funds are managed by trade unions, and part of their expenses are financed through the tax system. Members of an A-kasse are not obliged to be members of a trade union. [93] Not every Danish citizen or employee qualifies for a membership of an unemployment fund, and membership benefits will be terminated after 2 years of unemployment. [94] A person that is not a member of an A-kasse cannot receive unemployment benefits. [95] Unemployment funds do not pay benefits to sick members, who will be transferred to a municipal social support system instead. Denmark has a countrywide, but municipally administered social support system against poverty, securing that qualified citizens have a minimum living income. All Danish citizens above 18 years of age can apply for some financial support if they cannot support themselves or their family. Approval is not automatic, and the extent of this system has generally been diminished since the 1980s. Sick people can receive some financial support throughout the extent of their illness. Their ability to work will be re-evaluated by the municipality after 5 months of illness. [96] [97]

The welfare system related to the labor market has experienced several reforms and financial cuts since the late 1990s due to political agendas for increasing the labor supply. Several reforms of the rights of the unemployed have followed up, partially inspired by the Danish Economic Council. [98] Halving the time unemployment benefits can be received from four to two years, and making it twice as hard to regain this right, was implemented in 2010 for example.

Disabled people can apply for permanent social pensions. The extent of the support depends on the ability to work, and people below 40 can not receive social pension unless they are deemed incapable of any kind of work. [99]

Industries

Agriculture

Pasture grazing cattle (Romo) Romo - Kuhe an der Tranke.jpg
Pasture grazing cattle (Rømø)

Agriculture was once the most important industry in Denmark. Nowadays, it is of minor economic importance. In 2016, 62,000 people, or 2.5% of all employed people worked in agriculture and horticulture. Another 2,000 people worked in fishing. [14] As value added per person is relatively low, the share of national value added is somewhat lower. Total gross value added in agriculture, forestry and fishing amounted to 1.6% of total output in Denmark (in 2017). [6] Despite this, Denmark is still home to various types of agricultural production. Within animal husbandry, it includes dairy and beef cattle, pigs, poultry and fur animals – all sectors that produce mainly for export. Regarding vegetable production, Denmark is a leading producer of grass-, clover- and horticultural seeds. The agriculture and food sector as a whole represented 25% of total Danish commodity exports in 2015. [100]

63% of the land area of Denmark is used for agricultural production – the highest share in the world according to a report from University of Copenhagen in 2017. [101] The Danish agricultural industry is historically characterized by freehold and family ownership, but due to structural development farms have become fewer and larger. In 2020 the number of farms was approximately 33,000, [102] of which approximately 10,000 were owned by full-time farmers. [103]

Animal production

The tendency toward fewer and larger farms has been accompanied by an increase in animal production, using fewer resources per produced unit.

The number of dairy farmers has reduced to about 3,800 with an average herd size of 150 cows. The milk quota is 1,142 tonnes. More than half of the cows live in new loose-housing systems. Export of dairy products accounts for more than 20 percent of the total Danish agricultural export. The total number of cattle in 2011 was approximately 1.5 million. Of these, 565,000 were dairy cows and 99,000 were suckler cows. The yearly number of slaughtering of beef cattle is around 550,000.

For more than 100 years the production of pigs and pig meat was a major source of income in Denmark. Approximately 90 percent of the production is exported. This accounts for almost half of all agricultural exports and for around 5 percent of Denmark's total exports. About 4,200 farmers produce 28 million pigs annually. Of these, 20.9 million are slaughtered in Denmark.

Fur animal production on an industrial scale started in the 1930s in Denmark. Prior to a government-mandated culling during the COVID-19 pandemic, Denmark was the world's largest producer of mink furs, with 1,400 mink farmers fostering 17.2 million mink and producing around 14 million furs of the highest quality every year (see mink industry in Denmark). [104] Approximately 98 percent of the skins sold at Kopenhagen Fur Auction were exported. Fur ranked as Danish agriculture's third largest export article, at more than DKK 7 billion annually. The number of farms peaked in the late 1980s at more than 5,000 farms, but the number has declined steadily since, as individual farms grew in size. [104] Danish mink farmers claim their business to be sustainable, feeding the mink food industry waste and using all parts of the dead animal as meat, bone meal and biofuel. Special attention is given to the welfare of the mink, and regular "Open Farm" arrangements are made for the general public. [105] Mink thrive in, but are not a native to Denmark, and it is considered an invasive species. American Mink are now widespread in Denmark and continues to cause problems for the native wildlife, in particular waterfowl. [106] Denmark also has a small production of fox, chinchilla and rabbit furs. [105]

Two hundred professional producers are responsible for the Danish egg production, which was 66 million kg in 2011. Chickens for slaughter are often produced in units with 40,000 broilers. In 2012, 100 million chickens were slaughtered. In the minor productions of poultry, 13 million ducks, 1.4 million geese and 5.0 million turkeys were slaughtered in 2012.

Organic production

Organic farming and production has increased considerably and continuously in Denmark since 1987 when the first official regulations of this particular agricultural method came into effect. In 2017, the export of organic products reached DK 2.95 billion, a 153% increase from 2012 five years earlier, and a 21% increase from 2016. The import of organic products has always been higher than the exports though and reached DK 3.86 billion in 2017. After some years of stagnation, close to 10% of the cultivated land is now categorized as organically farmed, and 13.6% for the dairy industry, as of 2017. [107]

Denmark has the highest retail consumption share for organic products in the world. In 2017, the share was at 13.3%, accounting for a total of DKK 12.1 billion. [108]

Natural resource extraction

Denmark has large proven reserves of oil and natural gas in the North Sea with Esbjerg being the main city for the oil and gas industry. Production has decreased in recent years, though. Whereas in 2006 output (measured as gross value added or GVA) in mining and quarrying industries made up more than 4% of Denmark's total GVA, in 2023 it amounted to 1.1%. [6] The sector is very capital-intensive, so the share of employment is much lower: About 1,000 persons worked in the oil and gas extraction sector in 2022, and another 1,000 persons in extraction of gravel and stone, or in total less than 0.1% of total employment in Denmark. [109]

Engineering and high-tech

Denmark houses a number of significant engineering and high-technology firms, within the sectors of industrial equipment, aerospace, robotics, pharmaceutical and electronics.

Electronics and industrial equipment

Danfoss, headquartered in Nordborg, designs and manufactures industrial electronics, heating and cooling equipment, as well as drivetrains and power solutions. [110]

Denmark is also a large exporter of pumps, with the company Grundfos holding 50% of the market share, manufacturing circulation pumps. [111]

Manufacturing

In 2017 total output (gross value added) in manufacturing industries amounted to 14.4% of total output in Denmark. [6] 325,000 people or a little less than 12% of all employed persons worked in manufacturing (including utilities, mining and quarrying) in 2016. [14] Main sub-industries are manufacture of pharmaceuticals, machinery, and food products. [112]

Service industry

In 2017 total output (gross value added) in service industries amounted to 75.2% of total output in Denmark, [6] and 79.9% of all employed people worked here (in 2016). [14] Apart from public administration, education and health services, main service sub-industries were trade and transport services, and business services. [14]

Transport

Copenhagen Central Station with S-Trains. Copenhagen-Central-Station-Kobenhavn-H.jpg
Copenhagen Central Station with S-Trains.

Significant investment has been made in building road and rail links between Copenhagen and Malmö, Sweden (the Øresund Bridge), and between Zealand and Funen (the Great Belt Fixed Link). The Copenhagen Malmö Port was also formed between the two cities as the common port for the cities of both nations.

The main railway operator is Danske Statsbaner (Danish State Railways) for passenger services and DB Schenker Rail for freight trains. [113] The railway tracks are maintained by Banedanmark. Copenhagen has a small Metro system, the Copenhagen Metro and the greater Copenhagen area has an extensive electrified suburban railway network, the S-train.

Private vehicles are increasingly used as a means of transport. New cars are taxed by means of a registration tax (85% to 150%) and VAT (25%). The motorway network now covers 1,300 km. [114]

Denmark is in a strong position in terms of integrating fluctuating and unpredictable energy sources such as wind power in the grid. It is this knowledge that Denmark now aims to exploit in the transport sector by focusing on intelligent battery systems (V2G) and plug-in vehicles. [115]

Energy

Denmark has invested heavily in windfarms. In 2015, 42% of the domestic electricity consumption comes from wind. Middelgrunden wind farm 2009-07-01 edit filtered.jpg
Denmark has invested heavily in windfarms. In 2015, 42% of the domestic electricity consumption comes from wind.
Fossil fuel consumption in Denmark. Fossil fuel consumption in Denmark.svg
Fossil fuel consumption in Denmark.

Denmark has changed its energy consumption from 99% fossil fuels (92% oil (all imported) and 7% coal) and 1% biofuels in 1972 to 73% fossil fuels (37% oil (all domestic), 18% coal and 18% natural gas (all domestic)) and 27% renewables (largely biofuels) in 2015. The goal is a full independence of fossil fuels by 2050. This drastic change was initially inspired largely by the discovery of Danish oil and gas reserves in the North Sea in 1972 and the 1973 oil crisis. [116] The course took a giant leap forward in 1984, when the Danish North Sea oil and gas fields, developed by native industry in close cooperation with the state, started major productions. [117] In 1997, Denmark became self-sufficient with energy [118] and the overall CO2 emission from the energy sector began to fall by 1996. [119] Wind energy contribution to the total energy consumption has risen from 1% in 1997 to 5% in 2015. [120]

Since 2000, Denmark has increased gross domestic product (GDP) and at the same time decreased energy consumption. [121] Since 1972, the overall energy consumption has dropped by 6%, even though the GDP has doubled in the same period. [120] Denmark had the 6th best energy security in the world in 2014. [122] Denmark has had relatively high energy taxation to encourage careful use of energy since the oil crises in the 1970s, and Danish industry has adapted to this and gained a competitive edge. [123] The so-called "green taxes" have been broadly criticised partly for being higher than in other countries, but also for being more of a tool for gathering government revenue than a method of promoting "greener" behaviour. [124] [125]

2015 overall energy taxes, in billions DKK [126]
OilGasolineNatural gasCoalElectricity
Excise&VAT 9.37.33.32.511.7

Denmark has low electricity costs (including costs for cleaner energy) in EU, [127] but general taxes (11.7 billion DKK in 2015) [126] make the electricity price for households the highest in Europe. [128] As of 2015, Denmark has no environment tax on electricity. [129]

Denmark is a long-time leader in wind energy and a prominent exporter of Vestas and Siemens wind turbines, and in 2019 Denmark's exports of wind-turbine technology and services amounted to 8.9 billion. [130] It has integrated fluctuating and less predictable energy sources such as wind power into the grid. Wind produced the equivalent of 43% of Denmark's total electricity consumption in 2017. [131] [132] The share of total energy production is smaller: In 2015, wind accounted for 5% of total Danish energy production. [120]

Energinet.dk is the Danish national transmission system operator for electricity and natural gas. The electricity grids of western Denmark and eastern Denmark were not connected until 2010 when the 600MW Great Belt Power Link went into operation.

Cogeneration plants are the norm in Denmark, usually with district heating which serves 1.7 million households.

Waste-to-energy incinerators produce mostly heating and hot water. Vestforbrænding in Glostrup Municipality operates Denmark's largest incinerator, a cogeneration plant which supplies electricity to 80,000 households and heating equivalent to the consumption in 63,000 households (2016). Amager Bakke is an example of a new incinerator.

Greenland and the Faroe Islands

In addition to Denmark proper, the Kingdom of Denmark comprises two autonomous constituent countries in the North Atlantic Ocean: Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Both use the Danish krone as their currency, but form separate economies, having separate national accounts etc. Both countries receive an annual fiscal subsidy from Denmark which amounts to about 25% of Greenland's GDP and 11% of Faroese GDP. [133] [134] For both countries, fishing industry is a major economic activity.

Neither Greenland nor the Faroe Islands are members of the European Union. Greenland left the European Economic Community in 1986, and the Faroe Islands declined membership in 1973, when Denmark joined. [135] [136]

Data

The following table shows the main economic indicators in 1980–2023. Inflation under 2% is in green. [137]

YearGDP
(in bn. US$ PPP)
GDP per capita
(in US$ PPP)
GDP
(in bn. US$
nominal)
GDP growth
(real)
Inflation rate
(in Percent)
Unemployment
(in Percent)
Government debt
(in % of GDP)
198060.811,87071.1Decrease2.svg−0.5%Increase Negative.svg11.3%5.3%n/a
1981Increase2.svg66.1Increase2.svg12,903Decrease2.svg61.9Decrease2.svg−0.7%Increase Negative.svg11.7%Increase Negative.svg7.1%n/a
1982Increase2.svg72.8Increase2.svg14,217Decrease2.svg60.4Increase2.svg3.7%Increase Negative.svg10.1%Increase Negative.svg7.6%n/a
1983Increase2.svg77.6Increase2.svg15,165Increase2.svg60.6Increase2.svg2.6%Increase Negative.svg6.8%Decrease Positive.svg8.4%n/a
1984Increase2.svg83.7Increase2.svg16,382Decrease2.svg59.1Increase2.svg4.2%Increase Negative.svg6.3%Decrease Positive.svg7.9%n/a
1985Increase2.svg89.9Increase2.svg17,580Increase2.svg62.7Increase2.svg4.0%Increase Negative.svg4.7%Decrease Positive.svg6.6%n/a
1986Increase2.svg96.2Increase2.svg18,794Increase2.svg88.1Increase2.svg4.9%Increase Negative.svg3.7%Decrease Positive.svg5.0%n/a
1987Increase2.svg98.8Increase2.svg19,276Increase2.svg109.4Increase2.svg0.3%Increase Negative.svg4.0%Increase Negative.svg5.0%n/a
1988Increase2.svg102.3Increase2.svg19,936Increase2.svg115.6Steady2.svg0.0%Increase Negative.svg4.5%Increase Negative.svg5.7%n/a
1989Increase2.svg107.0Increase2.svg20,849Decrease2.svg112.4Increase2.svg0.6%Increase Negative.svg4.8%Increase Negative.svg6.8%n/a
1990Increase2.svg112.6Increase2.svg21,924Increase2.svg138.2Increase2.svg1.5%Increase Negative.svg2.6%Increase Negative.svg7.2%n/a
1991Increase2.svg118.0Increase2.svg22,932Increase2.svg139.2Increase2.svg1.4%Increase Negative.svg2.4%Increase Negative.svg7.9%n/a
1992Increase2.svg123.1Increase2.svg23,842Increase2.svg152.9Increase2.svg2.0%Increase Negative.svg2.1%Increase Negative.svg8.6%66.8
1993Increase2.svg126.0Increase2.svg24,322Decrease2.svg143.2Steady2.svg0.0%Increase2.svg1.2%Increase Negative.svg9.5%Increase Negative.svg78.6%
1994Increase2.svg135.6Increase2.svg26,084Increase2.svg156.2Increase2.svg5.3%Increase2.svg2.0%Decrease Positive.svg7.7%Decrease Positive.svg75.2%
1995Increase2.svg142.6Increase2.svg27,338Increase2.svg185.0Increase2.svg3.0%Increase Negative.svg2.0%Decrease Positive.svg6.8%Decrease Positive.svg71.4%
1996Increase2.svg149.4Increase2.svg28,454Increase2.svg187.6Increase2.svg2.9%Increase Negative.svg2.2%Decrease Positive.svg6.3%Decrease Positive.svg68.3%
1997Increase2.svg156.9Increase2.svg29,752Decrease2.svg173.5Increase2.svg3.3%Increase Negative.svg2.2%Decrease Positive.svg5.2%Decrease Positive.svg64.3%
1998Increase2.svg162.2Increase2.svg30,638Increase2.svg177.0Increase2.svg2.2%Increase2.svg1.8%Decrease Positive.svg4.9%Decrease Positive.svg60.3%
1999Increase2.svg169.4Increase2.svg31,873Increase2.svg178.0Increase2.svg2.9%Increase Negative.svg2.5%Increase Negative.svg5.1%Decrease Positive.svg56.8%
2000Increase2.svg179.7Increase2.svg33,713Decrease2.svg164.2Increase2.svg3.7%Increase Negative.svg2.9%Decrease Positive.svg4.3%Decrease Positive.svg52.4%
2001Increase2.svg185.3Increase2.svg34,631Increase2.svg164.8Increase2.svg0.8%Increase Negative.svg2.4%Increase Negative.svg4.5%Decrease Positive.svg48.5%
2002Increase2.svg189.0Increase2.svg35,209Increase2.svg178.6Increase2.svg0.5%Increase Negative.svg2.4%Increase Negative.svg4.6%Increase Negative.svg49.1%
2003Increase2.svg193.5Increase2.svg35,942Increase2.svg218.1Increase2.svg0.4%Increase Negative.svg2.1%Increase Negative.svg5.4%Decrease Positive.svg46.2%
2004Increase2.svg204.0Increase2.svg37,792Increase2.svg251.4Increase2.svg2.7%Increase2.svg1.1%Increase Negative.svg5.5%Decrease Positive.svg44.2%
2005Increase2.svg215.3Increase2.svg39,789Increase2.svg264.5Increase2.svg2.3%Increase2.svg1.8%Decrease Positive.svg4.8%Decrease Positive.svg37.4%
2006Increase2.svg230.6Increase2.svg42,495Increase2.svg282.9Increase2.svg3.9%Increase2.svg1.9%Decrease Positive.svg3.9%Decrease Positive.svg31.5%
2007Increase2.svg239.0Increase2.svg43,881Increase2.svg319.4Increase2.svg0.9%Increase2.svg1.7%Decrease Positive.svg3.8%Decrease Positive.svg27.3%
2008Increase2.svg242.3Increase2.svg44,261Increase2.svg353.4Decrease2.svg−0.5%Increase Negative.svg3.4%Decrease Positive.svg3.5%Increase Negative.svg33.3%
2009Decrease2.svg232.0Decrease2.svg42,085Decrease2.svg321.2Decrease2.svg−4.9%Increase2.svg1.3%Increase Negative.svg6.0%Increase Negative.svg40.2%
2010Increase2.svg239.1Increase2.svg43,204Increase2.svg322.0Increase2.svg1.9%Increase Negative.svg2.3%Increase Negative.svg7.5%Increase Negative.svg42.6%
2011Increase2.svg247.4Increase2.svg44,483Increase2.svg344.0Increase2.svg1.3%Increase2.svg1.1%Increase Negative.svg7.6%Increase Negative.svg46.1%
2012Increase2.svg250.5Increase2.svg44,893Decrease2.svg327.1Increase2.svg0.2%Increase Negative.svg2.4%Decrease Positive.svg7.5%Decrease Positive.svg44.9%
2013Increase2.svg262.4Increase2.svg46,829Increase2.svg343.6Increase2.svg0.9%Increase2.svg0.8%Decrease Positive.svg7.0%Decrease Positive.svg44.0%
2014Increase2.svg270.3Increase2.svg48,040Decrease2.svg353.0Increase2.svg1.6%Increase2.svg0.6%Decrease Positive.svg6.5%Decrease Positive.svg43.9%
2015Increase2.svg278.8Increase2.svg49,265Decrease2.svg302.7Increase2.svg1.6%Increase2.svg0.5%Decrease Positive.svg6.2%Decrease Positive.svg39.6%
2016Increase2.svg297.7Increase2.svg52,160Increase2.svg313.1Increase2.svg2.0%Increase2.svg0.3%Steady2.svg6.2%Decrease Positive.svg37.8%
2017Increase2.svg320.1Increase2.svg55,673Increase2.svg332.1Increase2.svg2.8%Increase2.svg1.1%Decrease Positive.svg5.8%Decrease Positive.svg35.9%
2018Increase2.svg334.3Increase2.svg57,821Increase2.svg334.2Increase2.svg2.0%Increase2.svg0.7%Decrease Positive.svg5.2%Decrease Positive.svg34.0%
2019Increase2.svg345.3Increase2.svg59,480Increase2.svg346.5Increase2.svg1.5%Increase2.svg0.7%Decrease Positive.svg5.0%Decrease Positive.svg33.7%
2020Decrease2.svg341.4Decrease2.svg58,628Increase2.svg354.8Decrease2.svg−2.4%Increase2.svg0.3%Increase Negative.svg5.6%Increase Negative.svg42.3%
2021Increase2.svg381.1Increase2.svg65,261Increase2.svg405.7Increase2.svg6.8%Increase2.svg1.9%Decrease Positive.svg5.1%Decrease Positive.svg36.9%
2022Increase2.svg419.0Increase2.svg71,332Decrease2.svg401.1Increase2.svg2.7%Increase Negative.svg8.5%Decrease Positive.svg4.5%Decrease Positive.svg29.7%
2023Increase2.svg441.8Increase2.svg74,958Increase2.svg420.8Increase2.svg1.7%Increase Negative.svg4.1%Increase Negative.svg5.0%Increase Negative.svg30.1%

Major companies

Denmark has fostered and is home to many multi-national companies. Many of the largest are interdisciplinary with business – and sometimes research activities – in several fields. The most notable companies include:

Agribusiness
Banking
Clothing and attire
Construction
Energy technology
Electronics
Food and drink
Medical equipment
Pharmaceutical and biotechnology

Many of the largest food producers are also engaged in biotechnology and research. Notable companies dedicated to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sector, includes:

Retail

Software

Transport
Miscellaneous

Cooperatives

Denmark has a long tradition for cooperative production and trade on a large scale. The most notable cooperative societies today includes the agricultural coop of Dansk Landbrugs Grovvareselskab (DLG), dairy producer Arla Foods and the retail cooperative Coop Danmark. Coop Danmark started out as "Fællesforeningen for Danmarks Brugsforeninger" (FDB) in 1896 and now has around 1.4 million members in Denmark as of 2017. [138] It is part of the larger multi-sector cooperative Coop amba which has 1.7 million members in that same year.

The cooperative structure also extends to both the housing and banking sector. Arbejdernes Landsbank, founded in 1919, is the largest bank cooperative and it is currently the 6th largest bank in the country as of 2018. [139] The municipality of Copenhagen alone holds a total of 153 housing cooperatives and "Arbejdernes Andelsboligforening Århus" (AAB Århus) is the largest individual housing cooperative in Denmark, with 23,000 homes in Aarhus. [140]

Statistics

In 2022, the sector with the highest number of companies registered in Denmark is Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate with 204,853 companies followed by Services and Retail Trade with 204,050 and 30,563 companies respectively. [141]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Chile</span>

The economy of Chile operates as a market economy and is classified as a high-income economy by the World Bank. It is recognized as one of the most prosperous countries in South America, leading the region in areas such as competitiveness, income per capita, globalization, economic freedom, and low levels of perceived corruption. Despite its prosperity, Chile experiences significant economic inequality, as reflected by its Gini index, though this is close to the regional average. Among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, Chile has a robust social security system, with social welfare expenditures amounting to approximately 19.6% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Czech Republic</span>

The economy of the Czech Republic is a developed export-oriented social market economy based in services, manufacturing, and innovation that maintains a high-income welfare state and the European social model. The Czech Republic participates in the European Single Market as a member of the European Union, and is therefore a part of the economy of the European Union. It uses its own currency, the Czech koruna, instead of the euro. It is a member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The Czech Republic ranks 16th in inequality-adjusted human development and 24th in World Bank Human Capital Index, ahead of countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom or France. It was described by The Guardian as "one of Europe's most flourishing economies".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Estonia</span>

The economy of Estonia is rated advanced by the World Bank, i.e. with high quality of life and advanced infrastructure relative to less industrialized nations. Estonia is a member of the European Union, eurozone and OECD The economy is heavily influenced by developments in the Finnish and Swedish economies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Finland</span>

The economy of Finland is a highly industrialised, mixed economy with a per capita output similar to that of western European economies such as France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. The largest sector of Finland's economy is its service sector, which contributes 72.7% to the country's gross domestic product (GDP); followed by manufacturing and refining at 31.4%; and concluded with the country's primary sector at 2.9%. Among OECD nations, Finland has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 29% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Greece</span>

The economy of Greece is the 52nd largest in the world, with a nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of $252.732 billion per annum. In terms of purchasing power parity, Greece is the world's 54th largest economy, at $436.757 billion per annum. As of 2023, Greece is the sixteenth largest economy in the European Union and eleventh largest in the eurozone. According to the International Monetary Fund's figures for 2024, Greece's GDP per capita is $24,342 at nominal value and $42,066 at purchasing power parity. Among OECD nations, Greece has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 24.1% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Hungary</span>

The economy of Hungary is a developing, high-income mixed economy, ranked as the 9th most complex economy according to the Economic Complexity Index. Hungary is a member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with a very high human development index and a skilled labour force, with the 22nd lowest income inequality by Gini index in the world. The Hungarian economy is the 53rd-largest economy in the world with $265.037 billion annual output, and ranks 41st in the world in terms of GDP per capita measured by purchasing power parity. Hungary has an export-oriented market economy with a heavy emphasis on foreign trade; thus the country is the 35th largest export economy in the world. The country had more than $100 billion of exports in 2015, with a high trade surplus of $9.003 billion, of which 79% went to the European Union (EU) and 21% was extra-EU trade. Hungary's productive capacity is more than 80% privately owned, with 39.1% overall taxation, which funds the country's welfare economy. On the expenditure side, household consumption is the main component of GDP and accounts for 50% of its total, followed by gross fixed capital formation with 22% and government expenditure with 20%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Malta</span>

The economy of Malta is a highly industrialised service-based economy. It is classified as an advanced economy by the International Monetary Fund and is considered a high-income country by the World Bank and an innovation-driven economy by the World Economic Forum. It is a member of the European Union and of the eurozone, having formally adopted the euro on 1 January 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of New Zealand</span> Overview of the New Zealand economy

The economy of New Zealand is a highly developed free-market economy. It is the 52nd-largest national economy in the world when measured by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and the 63rd-largest in the world when measured by purchasing power parity (PPP). New Zealand has one of the most globalised economies and depends greatly on international trade, mainly with China, Australia, the European Union, the United States, and Japan. New Zealand's 1983 Closer Economic Relations agreement with Australia means that the economy aligns closely with that of Australia. Among OECD nations, New Zealand has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 19.4% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Poland</span>

The economy of Poland is an emerging and developing, high-income, industrialized, mixed economy that serves as the sixth-largest in the European Union by nominal GDP and fifth-largest by GDP (PPP). Poland boasts the extensive public services characteristic of most developed economies and is one of few countries in Europe to provide no tuition fees for undergraduate and postgraduate education and with universal public healthcare that is free at a point of use. Since 1988, Poland has pursued a policy of economic liberalisation but retained an advanced public welfare system. It ranks 20th worldwide in terms of GDP (PPP), 21st in terms of GDP (nominal), and 21st in the 2023 Economic Complexity Index. Among OECD nations, Poland has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 22.7% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Romania</span>

The economy of Romania is a developing high-income mixed economy, with a high degree of complexity. It ranks 12th in the European Union by total nominal GDP and 7th largest when adjusted by purchasing power (PPP). The World Bank notes that Romania's efforts are focused on accelerating structural reforms and strengthening institutions in order to further converge with the European Union. The country's economic growth has been one of the highest in the EU since 2010, with 2022 seeing a better-than-expected 4.8% increase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Slovakia</span>

The economy of Slovakia is based upon Slovakia becoming an EU member state in 2004, and adopting the euro at the beginning of 2009. Its capital, Bratislava, is the largest financial centre in Slovakia. As of Q1 2018, the unemployment rate was 5.72%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Switzerland</span>

The Economy of Switzerland is one of the world's most advanced and a highly-developed free market economy. The economy of Switzerland has ranked first in the world since 2015 on the Global Innovation Index and third in the 2020 Global Competitiveness Report. According to United Nations data for 2016, Switzerland is the third richest landlocked country in the world after Liechtenstein and Luxembourg. Together with the latter and Norway, they are the only three countries in the world with a GDP per capita (nominal) above US$90,000 that are neither island nations nor ministates. Among OECD nations, Switzerland holds the 3rd-largest GDP per capita. Switzerland has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 24.1% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Norway</span>

The economy of Norway is a highly developed mixed economy with state-ownership in strategic areas. Although sensitive to global business cycles, the economy of Norway has shown robust growth since the start of the industrial era. The country has a very high standard of living compared with other European countries. Norway's modern manufacturing and welfare system rely on a financial reserve produced by exploitation of natural resources, particularly North Sea oil. Among OECD nations, Norway has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 22.6% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Netherlands</span>

The economy of the Netherlands is a highly developed market economy focused on trade and logistics, manufacturing, services, innovation and technology and sustainable and renewable energy. It is the world's 18th largest economy by nominal GDP and the 28th largest by purchasing power parity (PPP) and is the fifth largest economy in European Union by nominal GDP. It has the world's 11th highest per capita GDP (nominal) and the 13th highest per capita GDP (PPP) as of 2023 making it one of the highest earning nations in the world. Many of the world's largest tech companies are based in its capital Amsterdam or have established their European headquarters in the city, such as IBM, Microsoft, Google, Oracle, Cisco, Uber, Netflix and Tesla. Its second largest city Rotterdam is a major trade, logistics and economic center of the world and is Europe's largest seaport. Netherlands is ranked fifth on global innovation index and fourth on the Global Competitiveness Report. Among OECD nations, Netherlands has a highly efficient and strong social security system; social expenditure stood at roughly 25.3% of GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Belgium</span>

The economy of Belgium is a highly developed, high-income, mixed economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of France</span>

The economy of France is a highly developed social market economy with notable state participation in strategic sectors. It is the world's seventh-largest economy by nominal GDP and the ninth-largest economy by PPP, constituting around 4% of world GDP. Due to a volatile currency exchange rate, France's GDP as measured in dollars fluctuates sharply, being smaller in 2024 than in 2008. France has a diversified economy, that is dominated by the service sector, whilst the industrial sector accounted for 19.5% of its GDP and the primary sector accounted for the remaining 1.7%. In 2020, France was the largest Foreign Direct Investment recipient in Europe, and Europe's second largest spender in research and development. It was ranked among the 10 most innovative countries in the world by the 2020 Bloomberg Innovation Index, as well as the 15th most competitive nation globally according to the 2019 Global Competitiveness Report. It was the fifth-largest trading nation in the world. France is also the most visited destination in the world, as well as the European Union's leading agricultural power.

The economies of Canada and the United States are similar because both are developed countries. While both countries feature in the top ten economies in the world in 2022, the U.S. is the largest economy in the world, with US$24.8 trillion, with Canada ranking ninth at US$2.2 trillion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the European Union</span>

The economy of the European Union is the joint economy of the member states of the European Union (EU). It is the second largest economy in the world in nominal terms, after the United States, and the third largest at purchasing power parity (PPP), after China and the US. The European Union's GDP is estimated to be $19.40 trillion (nominal) in 2024 or $28.04 trillion (PPP), representing around one-sixth of the global economy. Germany has the biggest national GDP of all EU countries, followed by France and Italy. In 2022, the social welfare expenditure of the European Union (EU) as a whole was 27.2% of its GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Republic of Ireland</span>

The economy of the Republic of Ireland is a highly developed knowledge economy, focused on services in high-tech, life sciences, financial services and agribusiness, including agrifood. Ireland is an open economy, and ranks first for high-value foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. In the global GDP per capita tables, Ireland ranks 2nd of 192 in the IMF table and 4th of 187 in the World Bank ranking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Sweden</span>

The economy of Sweden is a highly developed export-oriented economy, aided by timber, hydropower, and iron ore. These constitute the resource base of an economy oriented toward foreign trade. The main industries include motor vehicles, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, industrial machines, precision equipment, chemical goods, home goods and appliances, forestry, iron, and steel. Traditionally, Sweden relied on a modern agricultural economy that employed over half the domestic workforce. Today Sweden further develops engineering, mine, steel, and pulp industries, which are competitive internationally, as evidenced by companies such as Ericsson, ASEA/ABB, SKF, Alfa Laval, AGA, and Dyno Nobel.

References

  1. "World Economic Outlook Database, April 2024". IMF.org. International Monetary Fund.
  2. "World Bank Country and Lending Groups". datahelpdesk.worldbank.org. World Bank . Retrieved 29 September 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "The World Factbook". CIA.gov. Central Intelligence Agency . Retrieved 12 March 2024.
  4. "Population on 1 January". ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat . Retrieved 17 June 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: April 2024". imf.org. International Monetary Fund.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Table NABP10: 1–2.1.1 Production and generation of income (10a3-grouping) by transaction, industry and price unit". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  7. "Poverty rate". data.oecd.org. OECD . Retrieved 29 November 2019.
  8. "People at risk of poverty or social exclusion". ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat . Retrieved 5 March 2024.
  9. "Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income – EU-SILC survey". ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat . Retrieved 5 March 2024.
  10. 1 2 "Human Development Index (HDI)". hdr.undp.org. HDRO (Human Development Report Office) United Nations Development Programme . Retrieved 15 October 2022.
  11. "Corruption Perceptions Index". Transparency International . 30 January 2024. Archived from the original on 30 January 2024. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
  12. "Labor force, total – Denmark". data.worldbank.org. World Bank . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
  13. "Employment rate by sex, age group 20-64". ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat . Retrieved 20 July 2024.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 "Table RAS300: EMPLOYED (END NOVEMBER) BY INDUSTRY (DB07), SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, AGE AND SEX". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  15. "Unemployment by sex and age – monthly average". appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat . Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  16. "Unemployment rate by age group". data.oecd.org. OECD . Retrieved 7 September 2020.
  17. 1 2 "Net international investment position – quarterly data, % of GDP". Eurostat. 24 October 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Euro area and EU27 government deficit both at 0.6% of GDP" (PDF). ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  19. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 December 2017. Retrieved 25 December 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  20. "Sovereigns rating list". Standard & Poor's. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
  21. Monaghan, A. (15 October 2014). "The AAA-rated club: which countries still make the grade?". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 June 2018.
  22. "Scope affirms Denmark at AAA with Stable Outlook". Scope Ratings. Retrieved 6 September 2024.
  23. 1 2 "Gross national income per capita 2017, Atlas method and PPP" (PDF). World Bank. 21 September 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  24. 1 2 "Danish Economic Council: Danish Economy Fall 2016. English Summary, p. 335f". 4 October 2016.
  25. 1 2 "Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income – EU-SILC survey. Eurostat, last data update 20 November 2018" . Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  26. Statistikbanken.dk/10021:Befolkning og valg/(table)FOLK1AM
  27. Kenworthy, Lane (1999). "Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment" (PDF). Social Forces. 77 (3): 1119–1139. doi:10.2307/3005973. JSTOR   3005973. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 August 2013.
  28. Moller, Stephanie; Huber, Evelyne; Stephens, John D.; Bradley, David; Nielsen, François (2003). "Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies". American Sociological Review. 68 (1): 22–51. doi:10.2307/3088901. JSTOR   3088901.
  29. "Social Expenditure – Aggregated data". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .
  30. Eichengreen, Barry (2023). "The Danish problem". Economia Politica. 40 (3): 781–794. doi: 10.1007/s40888-023-00313-y . ISSN   1973-820X.
  31. "Harmonised unemployment rate by gender". Eurostat . Retrieved 1 December 2018.
  32. 1 2 3 4 "Ingrid Henriksen: An Economic History of Denmark. EH.Net Encyclopedia, edited by Robert Whaples". 6 October 2006.
  33. (in Danish) Steen Busck: Udenrigshandel før 1848. From danmarkshistorien.dk, Aarhus University. Date 6 July 2012.
  34. (in Danish) 650 f. kr.-1020 – Etablering af møntvæsen. Website of Danmarks Nationalbank, date 14 June 2016.
  35. Hanno Brand, Leos Müller (2007). The Dynamics of Economic Culture in the North Sea and Baltic Region In the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period. Verloren. pp. 19–21. ISBN   9789065508829.
  36. (in Danish) Steen Busck: Merkantilisme. From danmarkshistorien.dk, Aarhus University. Date 9 February 2015.
  37. (in Danish) Peter Bejder and Benjamin Kristensen: Merkantilisme og danske tropekolonier, ca. 1600–1917. From danmarkshistorien.dk, Aarhus University. Date 2 November 2015.
  38. 1 2 Kærgård, Niels (2022), "The Economic History of Denmark, 1784–2019", Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance, doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.681, ISBN   978-0-19-062597-9
  39. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (15 ed.). Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1983. p. 324. ISBN   9780852294000.
  40. (in Danish) Hansen, Sv. Aa. (1976): Økonomisk vækst i Danmark. Volume I: 1720–1914, volume II: 1914–70. Akademisk Forlag.
  41. (in Danish) Erik Strange Petersen: Det unge demokrati, 1848–1901: Fremstillingserhverv og industrialisering. From danmarkshistorien.dk, Aarhus University. Undated, retrieved 23 October 2017. Archived 29 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  42. (in Danish) Johansen, H.C. (2005): Gyldendal og Politikens Danmarkshistorie, volume 17. Statistik og register. P. 157. Gyldendal and Politikens Forlag.
  43. (in Danish) Jacob Isaksen, Uffe Mikkelsen and Peter Beck Nellemann (2012): Arbejdsmarkedsreformer i Danmark og Tyskland. Kvartalsoversigt, 3. kvartal 2012, del 1. Danmarks Nationalbank.
  44. (in Danish) Finanspolitisk holdbarhed. Kapitel III i De Økonomiske Råds Formandskab: Dansk Økonomi, efterår 2016. De Økonomiske Råds Sekretariat. P. 146.
  45. Nelson, Eshe (30 August 2023). "Novo Nordisk Tilts G.D.P. In Denmark". The New York Times. p. B1. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 5 October 2023.
  46. 1 2 "Danish Economic Council: Economy and the Environment 2017. English Summary, p. 341". 23 February 2017.
  47. (in Danish) Danskernes pensionsformue er massiv. Analysis from "Dansk Metal" dated 6 November 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  48. "Household wealth and debt. Website of Danmarks Nationalbank, published 21 February 2014 with updates April 2017" . Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  49. (in Danish) Indkomstudvikling og -fordeling i Danmark 1983–2005. Website of Ministry of Finance, Denmark. Dated January 2008, retrieved 1 December 2018. Archived 2 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  50. "Table IFOR41: Inequality indicators on equivalised disposable income by indicator and municipality". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  51. "Country Comparison: Distribution of family income – Gini index". The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  52. "Flexicurity". The Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment. Retrieved 23 November 2018.
  53. "An Economic History of Denmark". eh.net. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  54. 1 2 Jespersen, Svend T.; Munch, Jakob R.; Skipper, Lars (2008). "Costs and benefits of Danish active labour market programmes" (PDF). Labour Economics. 15 (5): 859–884. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2007.07.005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 August 2019.
  55. Hendeliowitz, Jan (February 2008). "Danish Employment Policy" (PDF). Employment Region Copenhagen & Zealand The Danish National Labour Market Authority. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 June 2015.
  56. Greve, Bent (2012). "Denmark a Nordic Welfare State – Are the Active Labour Market Policy Withering Away?". The Open Social Science Journal. 5: 15–23. doi: 10.2174/1874945301205010015 . S2CID   14300043.
  57. "Youth unemployment policies: Review of the Danish Youth Unemployment Programme and the British New Deal for Young People" (PDF). Mutual Learning Employment. S2CID   8717167. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 December 2011.
  58. "Tackling youth unemployment in Denmark". Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment. Archived from the original on 2 August 2019. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  59. 1 2 "Building Bridge to Education". Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment. Archived from the original on 2 August 2019. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  60. "LFS by sex and age – indicators: Labour force participation rate. OECD statistics" . Retrieved 23 November 2018.
  61. "Eurostat Employment and Unemployment Database, Table une_rt_a. Unemployment by sex and age – annual average. Last update 31 October 2018".
  62. "Table NAN1: Demand and supply by price unit, transaction and time". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 23 November 2018.
  63. (in Danish) "Personaleomsætning 2017: Flere skifter job – især i serviceerhverv". Confederation of Danish Industry, 18 June 2018. Archived 16 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  64. (in Danish) Hyppige jobskift koster milliarder Archived 30 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  65. "Table NAN1: Demand and supply by transaction and price unit". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  66. "Table UHV4: Total external trade by imports and exports, main SITC groups and country". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  67. "Table UHTP: International trade in services, quarterly by imports and exports, items and time". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  68. "Table UHV2: Total external trade by imports and exports, seasonal adjustment and country". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  69. "Balance of payments, current account, quarterly data – % of GDP". Eurostat. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  70. "History of Danish coinage". Denmarks Nationalbank. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 12 April 2012.
  71. (in Danish) P. U. Johansen and M. Trier (2012): Danmarks økonomi siden 1980 – en oversigt. Handelshøjskolens forlag. P. 144.
  72. (in Danish) "Nej"-sidens forspring skrumpet en smule. Brief from Danske Bank, published 24 March 2014. Retrieved 25 November 2018. Archived 23 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  73. 1 2 London, Charles Duxbury in Stockholm And Josie Cox in (30 January 2015). "Denmark Suspends Bond Issuance to Protect Krone's Peg". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  74. Dorrucci, Ettore; Fidora, Michael; Gartner, Christine; Zumer, Tina (5 January 2021). "The European exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) as a preparatory phase on the path towards euro adoption – the cases of Bulgaria and Croatia". European Central Bank. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
  75. "Official interest rates. Website of Danmarks Nationalbank" . Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  76. 1 2 "Table PRIS112: CONSUMER PRICE INDEX (2015=100) BY MAIN FIGURES". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  77. 1 2 "Denmark. OECD Journal on Budgeting, Volume 2015/2,OECD 2016" (PDF).
  78. "Danish Economic Council: Danish Economy, Spring 2017. English Summary". 24 May 2017. p. 297.
  79. "Danish Economic Councils. Information in English on website of Danish Economic Councils". 30 September 2014. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  80. (in Danish) Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik nr. 126, 23 March 2018. Offentligt kvartalsregnskab 4. kvt. 2017: Fortsat fald i den offentlige finansielle nettogæld.
  81. "General government financial wealth". OECDiLibrary. 2018. doi: 10.1787/325ddad1-en .
  82. "Table EDP3: Denmark's EMU-debt and EMU-deficit by function (% of GDP)". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  83. 1 2 "Table EDP2: EU-countries, public finances by country and function (in % of GDP)". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  84. 1 2 "Denmarks Convergence Programme 2018. Website of Danish Ministry of Finance". 16 May 2018. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  85. "Danish Economic Council: Danish Economy, Spring 2018. English Summary". 14 May 2018. p. 242.
  86. 1 2 "SKTRYK: Tax level by national account groups". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  87. Revenue Statistics 2023. OECD.org, retrieved 18 December 2023.
  88. 1 2 "OECD Revenue Statistics 2023 – Denmark" (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  89. "Marginal tax for all taxpayers". Danish Ministry of Taxation. 8 April 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  90. Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen (November 2014). "How Can Scandinavians Tax So Much?". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 28 (4): 77–98. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.4.77 . S2CID   54184316.
  91. "Denmark mulls higher taxes for energy traders". 4 May 2023.
  92. "LBESK02: EMPLOYEES (MONTH) BY SECTOR (2-GRP)". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 24 November 2018.
  93. "What is an A-kasse?". akasse.com (in Danish). CA a-kasse. 16 March 2011. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
  94. "Introducing Masters Unemployment Insurance Fund". Magistrenes A-kasse (MA). Archived from the original on 23 January 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  95. "A-kasse vs. kontanthjælp". a-kasse.com (in Danish). CA a-kasse. 21 March 2011. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
  96. "Økonomisk tilskud fra kommunen [financial support from the municipality]". Borger.dk (in Danish). The Danish State, Kommunernes Landsforening (Local Government Denmark) and Danske Regioner (Danish Regions). Retrieved 23 January 2015.
  97. "Sygedagpenge [Social benefits for the sick]" (in Danish). Ministry of Employment. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  98. "Få overblikket over dagpengereformen [Get an overview of the unemployment benefit reform]" (in Danish). AK-Samvirket. 13 March 2013. Archived from the original on 28 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015. AK-Samvirket is an umbrella organization of the Danish unemployment funds.
  99. "Førtidspension". Archived from the original on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 17 April 2018.
  100. "Products exported by Denmark (2015)". The Observatory of Economic Complexity. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  101. (in Danish) Udviklingen af landbrugslandet gennem seks årtier fra 1954 til 2025, Miljø- og Fødevareudvalget 2016–17 MOF Alm.del Bilag 230, Folketinget.dk 2017
  102. "Table BDF11: Farms by region, unit, type of farms and area". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  103. (in Danish) "Færre end 10.000 heltids-landbrug tilbage i Danmark". Landbrugsavisen.dk. 12 July 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  104. 1 2 "Mink" (in Danish). Landbrug & Fødevarer. Retrieved 25 January 2016. "Langbrug & Fødevarer" is the largest interest organization for the Danish agricultural and food industry.
  105. 1 2 "Danske minkfarmere [Danish Mink Farmers]" (in Danish). Danske Minkavlere. Retrieved 25 January 2016. "Danske Minkavlere" is the business organization of the Danish mink farming industry.
  106. "Mink" (in Danish). Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
  107. "Organic production and trade". Statistics Denmark. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
  108. "World leading organic nation". Organic Denmark. 10 August 2018. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
  109. "Table RAS300: EMPLOYED (END NOVEMBER) BY INDUSTRY (DB07), SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, AGE AND SEX". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
  110. "Danfoss – Rejsen mod Engineering Tomorrow".
  111. "Danish Grundfos the world's largest pump group". 13 July 2007.
  112. "Table NABP69: 1–2.1.1 Production and generation of income (69-grouping) by transaction, industry and price unit". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  113. "Virksomheden". DSB.dk (in Danish). DSB. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
  114. "Table VEJ11: Road network 1 January by part of the country and type of road". StatBank Denmark. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  115. "Plug-in and Electrical Vehicles". EnergyMap.dk. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
  116. "Energiomstilling 2050: 1972". Danish Energy Agency . 31 October 2021.
  117. "Energiomstilling 2050: 1984". Danish Energy Agency . 31 October 2021.
  118. In this context, "self-sufficient" means that the domestic energy production is equal to the energy consumption in terms of joules.
  119. "Energiomstilling 2050: 1997". Danish Energy Agency . 31 October 2021.
  120. 1 2 3 "Energiomstilling 2050: 2015". Danish Energy Agency . 31 October 2021.
  121. Rasmus Tengvad. Det danske energiforbrug på rekordlavt niveau Archived 19 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine Dansk Energi, 30 January 2015.
  122. "Global Rankings", Accessed: 24 January 2016.
  123. "Grønne afgifter gavner konkurrenceevne". Dagbladet Information . 12 December 2011. Danish industry has gained on the use of green taxes (dansk erhvervsliv har vundet på brugen af grønne afgifter)
  124. "Dansk Industri til angreb på regeringens grønne afgifter". Dagbladet Information . 19 January 2013. We have a tax system that goes beyond environment reasons to also fill up the state coffers (idag er vi imidlertid endt med et afgiftssystem, der går ud over den rent miljømæssige begrundelse og også er blevet en måde at fylde statskassen op.)
  125. "EL: Grønne afgifter spænder ben for grøn omstilling". Dagbladet Information . 19 January 2013. But in reality they also help pay for schools, hospitals and police (Men i virkeligheden er de også med til at betale for skoler, sygehuse og politi)
  126. 1 2 Afgifter – provenuet af afgifter og moms 2009–2016, Danish Ministry of Taxation , 2015.
  127. Forbedring af den nationale elprisstatistik for erhverv page 7. Danish Energy Agency
  128. "Electricity prices for household consumers (taxes included), first half 2018 (EUR per kWh). Eurostat" . Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  129. Energy Prices and Taxes, Country Notes, 3rd Quarter 2015, pp.26-27. International Energy Agency , 2015. Archive
  130. "Danish exports of green technology increased by billions in 2019". State of Green. 5 May 2020. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  131. "Denmark breaks its own world record in wind energy". EurActiv – EU News & policy debates, across languages. 15 January 2016.
  132. "2017 var rekordår for dansk vindenergi" (in Danish). Ingeniøren.dk. 3 January 2018.
  133. "Greenland Economy – overview. The World Factbook, CIA, retrieved 7 December 2018". 12 July 2022.
  134. "Faroe Islands Economy – overview. The World Factbook, CIA, retrieved 7 December 2018". July 2022.
  135. "The Faroe Islands and the European Union". www.government.fo. The Government of the Faroe Islands. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  136. "What is Greenland's relationship with the EU?". english.eu.dk. The Danish Parliament EU Information Centre. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  137. "World Economic Outlook Database". IMF.
  138. "Coop Danmark A/S". Hoovers. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
  139. Pengeinstitutternes størrelsesgruppering (in Danish)
  140. "Statistik for registrede andelsboligforeninger på andelsboligforeninger.com [Statistics for registered housing cooperatives at andelsboligforeninger.com]" (in Danish). Andelsboligforeninger.com. Archived from the original on 1 May 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  141. "Industry Breakdown of Companies in Denmark". HitHorizons.

Further reading