Atrazine

Last updated
Atrazine
AtrazineVector.svg
Atrazine-3D-balls.png
Names
Preferred IUPAC name
6-Chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-(propan-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
Other names
Atrazine
1-Chloro-3-ethylamino-5-isopropylamino-2,4,6-triazine
2-Chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine
6-Chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChEBI
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
DrugBank
ECHA InfoCard 100.016.017 OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
KEGG
PubChem CID
UNII
  • InChI=1S/C8H14ClN5/c1-4-10-7-12-6(9)13-8(14-7)11-5(2)3/h5H,4H2,1-3H3,(H2,10,11,12,13,14) Yes check.svgY
    Key: MXWJVTOOROXGIU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Yes check.svgY
  • InChI=1/C8H14ClN5/c1-4-10-7-12-6(9)13-8(14-7)11-5(2)3/h5H,4H2,1-3H3,(H2,10,11,12,13,14)
    Key: MXWJVTOOROXGIU-UHFFFAOYAJ
  • Clc1nc(nc(n1)NC(C)C)NCC
Properties
C8H14ClN5
Molar mass 215.69 g·mol−1
AppearanceColorless solid
Density 1.187 g/cm3
Melting point 175 °C (347 °F; 448 K)
Boiling point 200 °C (392 °F; 473 K) decomposes [1]
7 mg/100 mL
Hazards
Flash point Noncombustible [1]
NIOSH (US health exposure limits):
PEL (Permissible)
None [1]
REL (Recommended)
TWA 5 mg/m3 [1]
IDLH (Immediate danger)
N.D. [1]
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
Yes check.svgY  verify  (what is  Yes check.svgYX mark.svgN ?)

Atrazine is a chlorinated herbicide of the triazine class. [2] It is used to prevent pre-emergence broadleaf weeds in crops such as maize (corn), [3] soybean [3] and sugarcane and on turf, such as golf courses and residential lawns. Atrazine's primary manufacturer is Syngenta and it is one of the most widely used herbicides in the United States, [2] Canadian, [4] and Australian agriculture. [5] Its use was banned in the European Union in 2004, when the EU found groundwater levels exceeding the limits set by regulators, and Syngenta could not show that this could be prevented nor that these levels were safe. [6] [7]

Contents

At least two significant Canadian farm well studies showed that atrazine was the most common contaminant found. [4] As of 2001, atrazine was the most commonly detected pesticide contaminating drinking water in the U.S. [8] :44 Studies suggest it is an endocrine disruptor, an agent that can alter the natural hormonal system. [9] However, in 2006 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had stated that under the Food Quality Protection Act "the risks associated with the pesticide residues pose a reasonable certainty of no harm", [10] and in 2007, the EPA said that atrazine does not adversely affect amphibian sexual development and that no additional testing was warranted. [11] The EPA's 2009 review [12] concluded that "the agency's scientific bases for its regulation of atrazine are robust and ensure prevention of exposure levels that could lead to reproductive effects in humans". [13] However, in their 2016 Refined Ecological Risk Assessment for Atrazine, it was stated that "it is difficult to make definitive conclusions about the impact of atrazine at a given concentration but multiple studies have reported effects to various endpoints at environmentally-relevant concentrations." [14] EPA started a registration review in 2013. [15]

The EPA's review has been criticized, and the safety of atrazine remains controversial. [16] [17] [18] EPA has however stated that "If at any time EPA determines there are urgent human or environmental risks from atrazine exposure that require prompt attention, we will take appropriate regulatory action, regardless of the status of the registration review process." [2]

Uses

Atrazine is an herbicide that is used to stop pre- and post-emergence broadleaf and grassy weeds in crops such as sorghum, maize, sugarcane, lupins, pine, and eucalypt plantations, and triazine-tolerant canola. [5]

In the United States as of 2014, atrazine was the second-most widely used herbicide after glyphosate, [16] with 76 million pounds (34 thousand metric tons) of it applied each year. [19] [20] Atrazine continues to be one of the most widely used herbicides in Australian agriculture. [5] Its effect on corn yields has been estimated from 1% to 8%, with 3–4% being the conclusion of one economics review. [21] [22] In another study looking at combined data from 236 university corn field trials from 1986 to 2005, atrazine treatments showed an average increase of 5.7 US bushels per acre (0.50 m3/ha) (~400 kilograms per hectare (360 lb/acre)) than alternative herbicide treatments. [23] Effects on sorghum yields have been estimated to be as high as 20%, owing in part to the absence of alternative weed control products that can be used on sorghum. [24]

Chemistry and biochemistry

Atrazine was invented in 1958 in the Geigy laboratories as the second of a series of 1,3,5-triazines. [25]

Atrazine is prepared from cyanuric chloride, which is treated sequentially with ethylamine and isopropylamine. Like other triazine herbicides, atrazine functions by binding to the plastoquinone-binding protein in photosystem II, which animals lack. Plant death results from starvation and oxidative damage caused by breakdown in the electron transport process. Oxidative damage is accelerated at high light intensity. [26]

Atrazine's effects in humans and animals primarily involve the endocrine system. Studies suggest that atrazine is an endocrine disruptor that can cause hormone imbalance. [9]

Atrazine has been found to act as an agonist of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1. [27] Atrazine has been shown to bind covalently to (chemically react with) a large number of mammalian proteins. [28]

Environment

Levels

Atrazine contamination of surface water (lakes, rivers, and streams) in the U.S. has been monitored by the EPA and has consistently exceeded levels of concern in two Missouri watersheds and one in Nebraska. [29] Monitoring of atrazine levels in community water systems in 31 high-use states found that levels exceeded levels of concern for infant exposure during at least one year between 1993 and 2001 in 34 of 3670 community water systems using surface water, and in none of 14,500 community water systems using groundwater. [30] Surface water monitoring data from 20 high atrazine use watersheds found peak atrazine levels up to 147 parts per billion, with daily averages in all cases below 10 parts per billion.

Biodegradation

Atrazine chlorohydrolase pathway Pathway Atrazine degradation.svg
Atrazine chlorohydrolase pathway

Atrazine remains in soil for a matter of months (although in some soils can persist to at least four years) [9] and can migrate from soil to groundwater; once in groundwater, it degrades slowly. It has been detected in groundwater at high levels in some regions of the U.S. where it is used on some crops and turf. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency expresses concern regarding contamination of surface waters (lakes, rivers, and streams). [9]

Atrazine degrades in soil primarily by the action of microbes. The half-life of atrazine in soil ranges from 13 to 261 days. [31] Atrazine biodegradation can occur by two known pathways:

  1. Hydrolysis of the C-Cl bond is followed by the ethyl and isopropyl groups, catalyzed by the hydrolase enzymes called AtzA, AtzB, and AtzC. The end product of this process is cyanuric acid, itself unstable with respect to ammonia and carbon dioxide. The best characterized organisms that use this pathway are of Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP.
  2. Dealkylation of the amino groups gives 2-chloro-4-hydroxy-6-amino-1,3,5-triazine, the degradation of which is unknown. This path also occurs in Pseudomonas species, as well as a number of bacteria. [32] [33]

Rates of biodegradation are affected by atrazine's low solubility; thus surfactants may increase the degradation rate. Though the two alkyl moieties readily support growth of certain microorganisms, the atrazine ring is a poor energy source due to the oxidized state of ring carbon. In fact, the most common pathway for atrazine degradation involves the intermediate, cyanuric acid, in which carbon is fully oxidized, thus the ring is primarily a nitrogen source for aerobic microorganisms. Atrazine may be catabolized as a carbon and nitrogen source in reducing environments, and some aerobic atrazine degraders have been shown to use the compound for growth under anoxia in the presence of nitrate as an electron acceptor, [34] a process referred to as a denitrification. When atrazine is used as a nitrogen source for bacterial growth, degradation may be regulated by the presence of alternative sources of nitrogen. In pure cultures of atrazine-degrading bacteria, as well as active soil communities, atrazine ring nitrogen, but not carbon are assimilated into microbial biomass. [35] Low concentrations of glucose can decrease the bioavailability, whereas higher concentrations promote the catabolism of atrazine. [36]

The genes for enzymes AtzA-C have been found to be highly conserved in atrazine-degrading organisms worldwide. In Pseudomonas sp. ADP[ clarification needed ], the Atz genes are located noncontiguously on a plasmid with the genes for mercury catabolism. AtzA-C genes have also been found in a Gram-positive bacterium, but are chromosomally located. [37] The insertion elements flanking each gene suggest that they are involved in the assembly of this specialized catabolic pathway. [33] Two options exist for degradation of atrazine using microbes, bioaugmentation or biostimulation. [33] Like the herbicides trifluralin and alachlor, atrazine is susceptible to rapid transformation in the presence of reduced iron-bearing soil clays, such as ferruginous smectites. In natural environments, some iron-bearing minerals are reduced by specific bacteria in the absence of oxygen, thus the abiotic transformation of herbicides by reduced minerals is viewed as "microbially induced". [38]

Photolysis

In 2016, photolytic degradation with 254 nm ultraviolet was seen by the authors of a particular study as an efficient process, which could be used in pilot plants to reduce or eliminate compounds of the atrazine class or similar emerging contaminants, in effluents. [39]

Toxicology

According to Extension Toxicology Network in the U.S., "The oral median Lethal Dose or LD50 for atrazine is 3090 mg/kg in rats, 1750 mg/kg in mice, 750 mg/kg in rabbits, and 1000 mg/kg in hamsters. The dermal LD50 in rabbits is 7500 mg/kg and greater than 3000 mg/kg in rats. The 1-hour inhalation LC50 is greater than 0.7 mg/L in rats. The 4-hour inhalation LC50 is 5.2 mg/L in rats." The maximum contaminant level is 0.003 mg/L and the reference dose is 0.035 mg/kg/day. [40]

Atrazine use in the USA in 2019 Atrazine USA 2019.png
Atrazine use in the USA in 2019

Mammals

A September 2003 review by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) stated that atrazine is "currently under review for pesticide re-registration by the EPA because of concerns that atrazine may cause cancer", but not enough information was available to "definitely state whether it causes cancer in humans." According to the ATSDR, one of the primary ways that atrazine can affect a person's health is "by altering the way that the reproductive system works. Studies of couples living on farms that use atrazine for weed control found an increase in the risk of preterm delivery, but these studies are difficult to interpret because most of the farmers were men who may have been exposed to several types of pesticides. Little information is available regarding the risks to children, however "[m]aternal exposure to atrazine in drinking water has been associated with low fetal weight and heart, urinary, and limb defects in humans". [41] Incidence of a birth defect known as gastroschisis appears to be higher in areas where surface water atrazine levels are elevated especially when conception occurs in the spring, the time when atrazine is commonly applied. [42]

The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified atrazine as "not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans" (Group 3). [43]

The EPA determined in 2003 "that atrazine is not likely to cause cancer in humans". [44]

In 2006, the EPA stated, "the risks associated with the pesticide residues pose a reasonable certainty of no harm". [10] [11]

In 2007, the EPA said, "studies thus far suggest that atrazine is an endocrine disruptor". The implications for children's health are related to effects during pregnancy and during sexual development, though few studies are available. In people, risks for preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation have been associated with exposure. Atrazine exposure has been shown to result in delays or changes in pubertal development in female rats; conflicting results have been observed in males. Male rats exposed via milk from orally exposed mothers exhibited higher levels of prostate inflammation as adults; immune effects have also been seen in male rats exposed in utero or while nursing. [9] EPA opened a new review in 2009 [12] that concluded that "the agency's scientific bases for its regulation of atrazine are robust and ensure prevention of exposure levels that could lead to reproductive effects in humans." [13] Deborah A. Cory-Slechta, a professor at the University of Rochester in New York has said in 2014, "The way the E.P.A. tests chemicals can vastly underestimate risks." She has studied atrazine's effects on the brain and serves on the E.P.A.'s science advisory board. She further stated, "There's still a huge amount we don't know about atrazine." [16]

A Natural Resources Defense Council report from 2009 said that the EPA is ignoring atrazine contamination in surface and drinking water in the central United States. [45]

"There was no consistent evidence of an association between atrazine use and any cancer site". The study tracked 57,310 licensed pesticide applicators over 13 years. [46]

A 2011 review of the mammalian reproductive toxicology of atrazine jointly conducted by the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concluded that atrazine was not teratogenic. Reproductive effects in rats and rabbits were only seen at doses that were toxic to the mother. Observed adverse effects in rats included fetal resorption in rates (at doses ≥50 mg/kg per day), delays in sexual development in female rats (at doses ≥30 mg/kg per day), and decreased birth weight (at doses ≥3.6 mg/kg per day). [47]

A 2014 systematic review, funded by atrazine manufacturer Syngenta, assessed its relation to reproductive health problems. The authors concluded that the quality of most studies was poor and without good quality data, the results were difficult to assess, though it was noted that no single category of negative pregnancy outcome was found consistently across studies. The authors concluded that a causal link between atrazine and adverse pregnancy outcomes was not warranted due to the poor quality of the data and the lack of robust findings across studies. Syngenta was not involved in the design, collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data and did not participate in the preparation of the manuscript. [48]

Amphibians

Atrazine has been a suspected teratogen, with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations. [49] A 2002 study by Tyrone Hayes, of the University of California, Berkeley, found that exposure caused male tadpoles to turn into hermaphrodites  – frogs with both male and female sexual characteristics. [50] [51] However, this study has not been able to be replicated, [52] and a 2003 EPA review of this study concluded that overcrowding, questionable sample handling techniques, and the failure of the authors to disclose key details including sample sizes, dose-response effects, and the variability of observed effects made it difficult to assess the study's credibility and ecological relevance. [52] [53] A 2005 study, requested by EPA and conducted under EPA guidance and inspection, was unable to reproduce Hayes' results. [54]

In 2010, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) tentatively concluded that environmental atrazine "at existing levels of exposure" was not affecting amphibian populations in Australia consistent with the 2007 EPA findings. [55] APVMA responded to Hayes' 2010 published paper, [56] that his findings "do not provide sufficient evidence to justify a reconsideration of current regulations which are based on a very extensive dataset." [55] The EPA's Scientific Advisory Panel examined relevant studies and concluded in 2010, "atrazine does not adversely affect amphibian gonadal development based on a review of laboratory and field studies". [11] It recommended proper study design for further investigation. As required by the EPA, two experiments were conducted under Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) and were inspected by EPA and German regulatory authorities, concluding 2009 that "long-term exposure of larval X. laevis to atrazine at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 μg/L does not affect growth, larval development, or sexual differentiation". [57] A 2008 report cited the independent work of researchers in Japan, who were unable to replicate Hayes' work. "The scientists found no hermaphrodite frogs; no increase in aromatase as measured by aromatase mRNA induction; and no increase in vitellogenin, another marker of feminization." [58] The Atrazine Saga has been chronicled. [59]

2012 Class action lawsuit

In 2012, Syngenta, manufacturer of atrazine, was the defendant in a class-action lawsuit concerning the levels of atrazine in human water supplies. Syngenta agreed to pay $105 million to reimburse more than one thousand water systems for "the cost of filtering atrazine from drinking water". The company denied all wrongdoing. [16] [60] [61]

2015 Canadian regulatory review

Prompted by the EU's 2004 ban, a regulatory review of the product in Canada by the PMRA was begun in 2015. On 31 March 2017 the review result was published and the PMRA decided to leave the product's registration unchanged the product's registration. This was done because while the EU's ban was based on a legislated pollutant level of 0.1 μg/L, the Canadian regulations call for a home-grown "risk-based scientific approach in determining the risk to human health from pesticides in drinking water." The US drinking water standard of 3 μg/L is approximately the same to the Canadian standard of 5 μg/L. Both maximum pollutant levels in North America were not exceeded by the maximum pollutant level in Canadian data of 2.32 μg/L. [62]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbicide</span> Type of chemical used to kill unwanted plants

Herbicides, also commonly known as weed killers, are substances used to control undesired plants, also known as weeds. Selective herbicides control specific weed species while leaving the desired crop relatively unharmed, while non-selective herbicides kill plants indiscriminately. The combined effects of herbicides, nitrogen fertilizer, and improved cultivars has increased yields of major crops by three to six times from 1900 to 2000.

Chlordane, or chlordan, is an organochlorine compound that was used as a pesticide. It is a white solid. In the United States, chlordane was used for termite-treatment of approximately 30 million homes until it was banned in 1988. Chlordane was banned 10 years earlier for food crops like corn and citrus, and on lawns and domestic gardens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glyphosate</span> Systemic herbicide and crop desiccant

Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum systemic herbicide and crop desiccant. It is an organophosphorus compound, specifically a phosphonate, which acts by inhibiting the plant enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSP). It is used to kill weeds, especially annual broadleaf weeds and grasses that compete with crops. Its herbicidal effectiveness was discovered by Monsanto chemist John E. Franz in 1970. Monsanto brought it to market for agricultural use in 1974 under the trade name Roundup. Monsanto's last commercially relevant United States patent expired in 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dicofol</span> Chemical compound

Dicofol is an insecticide, an organochlorine that is chemically related to DDT. Dicofol is a miticide that is very effective against spider mite. Its production and use is banned internationally under the Stockholm Convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imidacloprid</span> Chemical compound

Imidacloprid is a systemic insecticide belonging to a class of chemicals called the neonicotinoids which act on the central nervous system of insects. The chemical works by interfering with the transmission of stimuli in the insect nervous system. Specifically, it causes a blockage of the nicotinergic neuronal pathway. By blocking nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, imidacloprid prevents acetylcholine from transmitting impulses between nerves, resulting in the insect's paralysis and eventual death. It is effective on contact and via stomach action. Because imidacloprid binds much more strongly to insect neuron receptors than to mammal neuron receptors, this insecticide is more toxic to insects than to mammals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alachlor</span> Chemical compound; herbicide

Alachlor is an herbicide from the chloroacetanilide family. It is an odorless, white solid. The greatest use of alachlor is for control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in crops. Use of alachlor is illegal in the European Union and no products containing alachlor are currently registered in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Endrin</span> Chemical compound

Endrin is an organochlorine compound with the chemical formula C12H8Cl6O that was first produced in 1950 by Shell and Velsicol Chemical Corporation. It was primarily used as an insecticide, as well as a rodenticide and piscicide. It is a colourless, odorless solid, although commercial samples are often off-white. Endrin was manufactured as an emulsifiable solution known commercially as Endrex. The compound became infamous as a persistent organic pollutant and for this reason it is banned in many countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soil contamination</span> Pollution of land by human-made chemicals or other alteration

Soil contamination, soil pollution, or land pollution as a part of land degradation is caused by the presence of xenobiotic (human-made) chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil environment. It is typically caused by industrial activity, agricultural chemicals or improper disposal of waste. The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, solvents, pesticides, lead, and other heavy metals. Contamination is correlated with the degree of industrialization and intensity of chemical substance. The concern over soil contamination stems primarily from health risks, from direct contact with the contaminated soil, vapour from the contaminants, or from secondary contamination of water supplies within and underlying the soil. Mapping of contaminated soil sites and the resulting clean ups are time-consuming and expensive tasks, and require expertise in geology, hydrology, chemistry, computer modelling, and GIS in Environmental Contamination, as well as an appreciation of the history of industrial chemistry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acetochlor</span> Chemical compound

Acetochlor is an herbicide developed by Monsanto Company and Zeneca. It is a member of the class of herbicides known as chloroacetanilides. Its mode of action is elongase inhibition, and inhibition of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) cyclization enzymes, part of the gibberellin pathway. It carries high risks of environmental contamination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dicamba</span> Chemical compound used as herbicide

Dicamba is a selective systemic herbicide first registered in 1967. Brand names for formulations of this herbicide include Dianat, Banvel, Diablo, Oracle and Vanquish. This chemical compound is a chlorinated derivative of o-anisic acid. It has been described as a "widely used, low-cost, environmentally friendly herbicide that does not persist in soils and shows little or no toxicity to wildlife and humans."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental toxicology</span> Multidisciplinary field of science

Environmental toxicology is a multidisciplinary field of science concerned with the study of the harmful effects of various chemical, biological and physical agents on living organisms. Ecotoxicology is a subdiscipline of environmental toxicology concerned with studying the harmful effects of toxicants at the population and ecosystem levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of pesticides</span> Environmental effect

The environmental effects of pesticides describe the broad series of consequences of using pesticides. The unintended consequences of pesticides is one of the main drivers of the negative impact of modern industrial agriculture on the environment. Pesticides, because they are toxic chemicals meant to kill pest species, can affect non-target species, such as plants, animals and humans. Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach a destination other than their target species, because they are sprayed or spread across entire agricultural fields. Other agrochemicals, such as fertilizers, can also have negative effects on the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pesticides in the United States</span>

Pesticides in the United States are used predominantly by the agricultural sector, but approximately a quarter of them are used in houses, yards, parks, golf courses, and swimming pools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyrone Hayes</span> American biologist

Tyrone B. Hayes is an American biologist and professor of integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is known for his research in frogs, concluding that the herbicide atrazine is an endocrine disruptor that demasculinizes male frogs, causing them to display female characteristics. Hayes is an advocate for the critical review and regulation of pesticides as well as other chemicals that may cause adverse health effects. He has presented hundreds of papers, discussions, and seminars on his research's conclusion that environmental contaminants have played a major role in the global amphibian decline as well as being linked to the many health disparities that occur in minority and low income populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health effects of pesticides</span> How pesticides affect human health

Health effects of pesticides may be acute or delayed in those who are exposed. Acute effects can include pesticide poisoning, which may be a medical emergency. Strong evidence exists for other, long-term negative health outcomes from pesticide exposure including birth defects, fetal death, neurodevelopmental disorder, cancer, and neurologic illness including Parkinson's disease. Toxicity of pesticides depend on the type of chemical, route of exposure, dosage, and timing of exposure.

Dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA, with the main trade name Dacthal) is an organic compound with the formula C6Cl4(CO2CH3)2. It is the dimethyl ester of tetrachloroterephthalic acid, used as a preemergent herbicide with the ISO common name chlorthal-dimethyl. It kills annual grasses and many common weeds without killing sensitive plants such as turf grasses, flowers, fruits, vegetables, and cotton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bentazon</span> Chemical compound

Bentazon is a chemical manufactured by BASF Chemicals for use in herbicides. It is categorized under the thiadiazine group of chemicals. Sodium bentazon is available commercially and appears slightly brown in colour.

Pesticide degradation is the process by which a pesticide is transformed into a benign substance that is environmentally compatible with the site to which it was applied. Globally, an estimated 1 to 2.5 million tons of active pesticide ingredients are used each year, mainly in agriculture. Forty percent are herbicides, followed by insecticides and fungicides. Since their initial development in the 1940s, multiple chemical pesticides with different uses and modes of action have been employed. Pesticides are applied over large areas in agriculture and urban settings. Pesticide use, therefore, represents an important source of diffuse chemical environmental inputs.

Glyphosate-based herbicides are usually made of a glyphosate salt that is combined with other ingredients that are needed to stabilize the herbicide formula and allow penetration into plants. The glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup was first developed by Monsanto in the 1970s. It is used most heavily on corn, soy, and cotton crops that have been genetically modified to be resistant to the herbicide. Some products include two active ingredients, such as Enlist Duo which includes 2,4-D as well as glyphosate. As of 2010, more than 750 glyphosate products were on the market. The names of inert ingredients used in glyphosate formulations are usually not listed on the product labels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyanazine</span> Chemical compound

Cyanazine is a herbicide that belongs to the group of triazines. Cyanazine inhibits photosynthesis and is therefore used as a herbicide.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. "#0043". National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
  2. 1 2 3 "Ingredients Used in Pesticide Products-Atrazine". US Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on 2022-05-06. Retrieved 2021-08-08.
  3. 1 2 "Water Info : What's In My Water?: Atrazine". DrinkTap.org. Archived from the original on 1 January 2018.
  4. 1 2 "Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document – Atrazine". Health Canada. 1 November 2011. Archived from the original on 5 November 2022. Retrieved 5 November 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 "Chemical Review: Atrazine". Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. 2014-05-28. Archived from the original on 2015-02-11. Retrieved 2015-02-11.
  6. European Commission. 2004/248/EC: Commission Decision of 10 March 2004 concerning the non-inclusion of atrazine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2004) 731) Archived 15 March 2022 at the Wayback Machine Decision 2004/248/EC - Official Journal L 078, Decision 2004/248/EC. March 16, 2004: Quote: "(9) Assessments made on the basis of the information submitted have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing atrazine satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC. In particular, available monitoring data were insufficient to demonstrate that in large areas concentrations of the active substance and its breakdown products will not exceed 0,1 μg/L in groundwater. Moreover, it cannot be assured that continued use in other areas will permit a satisfactory recovery of groundwater quality where concentrations already exceed 0,1 μg/L in groundwater. These levels of the active substance exceed the limits in Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC and would have an unacceptable effect on groundwater." (10) Atrazine should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. (11) Measures should be taken to ensure that existing authorisations for plant protection products containing atrazine are withdrawn within a prescribed period and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted."
  7. Danny Hakimfeb for the New York Times. February 23, 2015. A Pesticide Banned, or Not, Underscores Trans-Atlantic Trade Sensitivities Archived 2016-12-23 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Gilliom RJ et al. US Geological Survey The Quality of Our Nation's Waters: Pesticides in the Nation's Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001 Archived 2013-11-26 at the Wayback Machine March 2006, Revised February 15, 2007
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Atrazine: Chemical Summary. Toxicity and Exposure Assessment for Children's Health (PDF) (Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007-04-24. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-16.
  10. 1 2 Triazine Cumulative Risk Assessment and Atrazine, Simazine, and Propazine Decisions Archived June 1, 2013, at the Wayback Machine , June 22, 2006, EPA.
  11. 1 2 3 Atrazine Updates: Amphibians Archived 2015-09-30 at the Wayback Machine , April 2010, EPA.
  12. 1 2 EPA Begins New Scientific Evaluation of Atrazine Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine , October 7, 2009, EPA.
  13. 1 2 EPA Atrazine Updates: Scientific Peer Review—Human Health Archived 2015-09-30 at the Wayback Machine Current as of January 2013. Accessed March 15, 2014
  14. "Refined Ecological Risk Assessment for Atrazine". EPA. p. 184. Archived from the original on 11 September 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  15. EPA [ww.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/atrazine/atrazine_update.htm#amphibian Atrazine Updates: Scientific Peer Review—Amphibians] Current as of January 2013. Accessed March 15, 2014
  16. 1 2 3 4 "A Valuable Reputation: Tyrone Hayes said that a chemical was harmful, its maker pursued him" Archived 2014-07-02 at the Wayback Machine by Rachel Aviv, The New Yorker , 10 February 2014
  17. Duhigg, Charles (August 22, 2009). "Debating How Much Weed Killer Is Safe in Your Water Glass". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2018-11-07. Retrieved 2015-05-02.
  18. Tillitt DE, Papoulias DM, Whyte JJ, Richter CA (2010). "Atrazine reduces reproduction in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)". Aquat. Toxicol. 99 (2): 149–59. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.04.011. PMID   20471700. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2020-09-01.
  19. Walsh, Edward (2003-02-01). "EPA Stops Short of Banning Herbicide". Washington Post. pp. A14. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
  20. "Restricted Use Products (RUP) Report: Six Month Summary List". Environmental Protection Agency. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2009.
  21. Ackerman, Frank (2007). "The economics of atrazine" (PDF). International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 13 (4): 437–445. doi:10.1179/oeh.2007.13.4.437. PMID   18085057. S2CID   2655422. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-06-22. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
  22. Swanton, Clarence J; Gulden, Robert H; Chandler, Kevin (2017). "BioOne Online Journals - A Rationale for Atrazine Stewardship in Corn". Weed Science . 55: 75–81. doi:10.1614/WS-06-104.1. S2CID   86209323.
  23. Fawcett, Richard S. "Twenty Years of University Corn Yield Data: With and Without Atrazine Archived 2009-05-14 at the Wayback Machine ", North Central Weed Science Society Archived March 5, 2014, at the Wayback Machine , 2008
  24. Mitchell, P. D (2014). "Market-level assessment of the economic benefits of atrazine in the United States". Pest Management Science . 70 (11): 1684–1696. doi:10.1002/ps.3703. PMC   4282455 . PMID   24318916.
  25. Wolfgang Krämer (2007). Modern Crop Protection Compounds, Volume 1. Wiley-VCH. ISBN   978-3-527-31496-6.[ permanent dead link ] (dead link 22 June 2022)
  26. Appleby, Arnold P.; Müller, Franz; Carpy, Serge (2001). "Weed Control". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. doi:10.1002/14356007.a28_165. ISBN   978-3-527-30673-2.
  27. Prossnitz, Eric R.; Barton, Matthias (May 2014). "Estrogen biology: New insights into GPER function and clinical opportunities". Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology . 389 (1–2): 71–83. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2014.02.002. PMC   4040308 . PMID   24530924.
  28. Dooley, G. P.; Reardon, K. F.; Prenni, J. E.; Tjalkens, R. B.; Legare, M. E.; Foradori, C. D.; Tessari, J. E.; Hanneman, W. H. (April 2008). "Proteomic Analysis of Diaminochlorotriazine Adducts in Wister Rat Pituitary Glands and LβT2 Rat Pituitary Cells". Chemical Research in Toxicology . 21 (4): 844–851. doi:10.1021/tx700386f. PMID   18370413.
  29. "Atrazine Updates | Pesticides | US EPA". Epa.gov. Archived from the original on 2015-09-30. Retrieved 2015-02-08.
  30. "www.epa.gov" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-06-25.
  31. Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Atrazine Archived June 25, 2008, at the Wayback Machine , U.S. EPA, January, 2003.
  32. Zeng Y, Sweeney CL, Stephens S, Kotharu P. (2004). Atrazine Pathway Map. Wackett LP. Biodegredation Database.
  33. 1 2 3 Wackett, L. P.; Sadowsky, M. J.; Martinez, B.; Shapir, N. (January 2002). "Biodegradation of atrazine and related s-triazine compounds: from enzymes to field studies". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 58 (1): 39–45. doi:10.1007/s00253-001-0862-y. PMID   11831474. S2CID   2998290.
  34. Crawford JJ, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL, Radosevich M (1998). "Biodegradation of atrazine under denitrifying conditions". Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49 (5): 618–623. doi:10.1007/s002530051223. PMID   9650260. S2CID   5126687.
  35. Bichat, F.; G.K. Sims; R.L. Mulvaney (1999). "Microbial utilization of heterocyclic nitrogen from atrazine". Soil Science Society of America Journal. 63 (1): 100–110. Bibcode:1999SSASJ..63..100B. doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300010016x.
  36. Ralebitso TK, Senior E, van Verseveld HW (2002). "Microbial aspects of atrazine degradation in natural environments". Biodegradation . 13 (1): 11–19. doi:10.1023/A:1016329628618. PMID   12222950. S2CID   21098999. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2019-10-29.
  37. Cai B, Han Y, Liu B, Ren Y, Jiang S (2003). "Isolation and characterization of an atrazine-degrading bacterium from industrial wastewater in China". Letters in Applied Microbiology . 36 (5): 272–276. doi:10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01307.x. PMID   12680937. S2CID   8003165.
  38. Xu J, Stucki JW, Wu J, Kostka J, Sims GK (2001). "Fate of atrazine and alachlor in redox-treated ferruginous smectite". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 20 (12): 2717–2724. doi:10.1002/etc.5620201210. PMID   11764154. S2CID   24221011.
  39. Felix de Lima et al, "Photolytic Degradation of Herbicide Atrazine by Radiation Ultraviolet (UVC): An Application of Green Chemistry" Archived 2018-05-02 at the Wayback Machine , Chemical Science International Journal 17(3): 1-10, 2016
  40. Pesticide Information Profile: Atrazine Archived 2022-04-01 at the Wayback Machine , Extension Toxicology Network (Cooperative Extension Offices of Cornell University, Oregon State University, the University of Idaho, and the University of California at Davis and the Institute for Environmental Toxicology, Michigan State University), June 1996.
  41. "Public Health Statement for Atrazine". Toxic Substances Portal - Atrazine. Center for Disease Control, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences. September 2003. Archived from the original on March 15, 2022. Retrieved May 2, 2015.
  42. Waller, Sarah A; Paul, Kathleen; Peterson, Suzanne E; Hitti, Jane E (March 2010). "Agricultural-related chemical exposures, season of conception, and risk of gastroschisis in Washington State". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 202 (3): 241.e1–241.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.023 . PMID   20207240.
  43. "IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENIC RISKS TO HUMANS" (PDF). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 73. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-26. Retrieved 2021-08-05.
  44. Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Atrazine Archived 2015-09-30 at the Wayback Machine , U.S. EPA, January, 2003.
  45. "How the EPA is Ignoring Atrazine Contamination in Surface and Drinking Water in the Central United States" (PDF). Natural Resources Defense Council . The New York Times. August 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-04-17. Retrieved 2010-12-19.
  46. Beane Freeman, Laura E. (2011) Atrazine and Cancer Incidence Among Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study (1994–2007) Archived 2012-03-28 at the Wayback Machine . Environmental Health Perspectives.
  47. "Chemical Hazards in Drinking Water - Atrazine" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2015-02-08.
  48. Goodman, M; Mandel, J. S.; Desesso, J. M.; Scialli, A. R. (2014). "Atrazine and pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review of epidemiologic evidence". Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology. 101 (3): 215–36. doi:10.1002/bdrb.21101. PMC   4265844 . PMID   24797711.
  49. Jennifer Lee (2003-06-19). "Popular Pesticide Faulted for Frogs' Sexual Abnormalities". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2018-07-27.
  50. Briggs, Helen. (April 15, 2002), Pesticide 'causes frogs to change sex' Archived 2007-10-07 at the Wayback Machine . BBC News. Retrieved on 2007-10-16.
  51. Hayes, Tyrone; Haston, Kelly; Tsui, Mable; Hoang, Anhthu; Haeffele, Cathryn; Vonk, Aaron (2002-10-31). "Feminization of male frogs in the wild". Nature. 419 (6910): 895–896. doi:10.1038/419895a. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   12410298. S2CID   4364535. Archived from the original on 2010-11-27. Retrieved 2022-12-04.
  52. 1 2 "Summary of Atrazine Reregistration Activities" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2021-08-14.
  53. "www.epa.gov" (PDF). EPA Scientific Advisory Panel. June 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2014-10-24.
  54. Jooste, Alarik M.; Du Preez, Louis H.; Carr, James A.; Giesy, John P.; Gross, Timothy S.; Kendall, Ronald J.; Smith, Ernest E.; Van Der Kraak, Glen L.; Solomon, Keith R. (July 2005). "Gonadal Development of Larval Male Xenopus laevis Exposed to Atrazine in Outdoor Microcosms". Environmental Science & Technology. 39 (14): 5255–5261. Bibcode:2005EnST...39.5255J. doi:10.1021/es048134q. PMID   16082954.
  55. 1 2 Chemicals in the News: Atrazine, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, Original June 30, 2010, Archived by Internet Archive July 4, 2010
  56. Hayes, TB; Khoury, V; Narayan, A; Nazir, M; Park, A; Brown, T; Adame, L; Chan, E; et al. (2010). "Atrazine induces complete feminization and chemical castration in male African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (10): 4612–7. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.4612H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909519107 . PMC   2842049 . PMID   20194757.
  57. Kloas, Werner; Lutz, Ilka; Springer, Timothy; Krueger, Henry; Wolf, Jeff; Holden, Larry; Hosmer, Alan (February 2009). "Does Atrazine Influence Larval Development and Sexual Differentiation in Xenopus laevis?". Toxicological Sciences. 107 (2): 376–384. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn232. PMC   2639758 . PMID   19008211.
  58. Renner, Rebecca (May 2008). "Atrazine Effects in Xenopus Aren't Reproducible". Environmental Science & Technology. 42 (10): 3491–3493. Bibcode:2008EnST...42.3491R. doi: 10.1021/es087113j . PMID   18546678.
  59. Rohr, Jason R. (2021). "The Atrazine Saga and its Importance to the Future of Toxicology, Science, and Environmental and Human Health". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 40 (6): 1544–1558. doi:10.1002/etc.5037.
  60. City of Greenville v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., and Syngenta AG Case No. 3:10-cv-00188-JPG-PMF Archived 2021-05-06 at the Wayback Machine , accessed August 23, 2013
  61. Clare Howard for Environmental Health News. June 17, 2013 Special Report: Syngenta's campaign to protect atrazine, discredit critics. Archived 2014-03-30 at the Wayback Machine
  62. "Re-evaluation Note REV2017-09, Special Review Decision: Atrazine". Pest Management Regulatory Agency. 31 March 2017. Archived from the original on 5 November 2022. Retrieved 5 November 2022.