Gap junction

Gap junction
Vertebrate gap junction
Identifiers
MeSH	D017629
TH	H1.00.01.1.02024
FMA	67423
Anatomical terminology [ edit on Wikidata]

Gap junctions are membrane channels between adjacent cells that allow the direct exchange of cytoplasmic substances. ^[1] Substances exchanged include small molecules, substrates, and metabolites. ^[1]

Gap junctions were first described as close appositions as other tight junctions, but following electron microscopy studies in 1967, they were renamed gap junctions to distinguish them from tight junctions. ^[2] They bridge a 2-4 nm gap between cell membranes. ^[3]

Gap junctions use protein complexes known as connexons to connect one cell to another. The proteins are called connexins. Gap junction proteins include the more than 26 types of connexin, and at least 12 non-connexin components that make up the gap junction complex or nexus. ^[4] These components include the tight junction protein ZO-1—a protein that holds membrane content together and adds structural clarity to a cell— ^[5] , sodium channels, ^[6] and aquaporin. ^{[7] [8]}

More gap junction proteins have become known due to the development of next-generation sequencing. Connexins were found to be structurally homologous between vertebrates and invertebrates but different in sequence. ^[9] As a result, the term innexin is used to differentiate invertebrate connexins. ^[10] There are more than 20 known innexins, ^[11] along with unnexins in parasites and vinnexins in viruses.

An electrical synapse is a gap junction that can transmit action potentials between neurons. Connexon pairs act as generalized regulated gates for ions and smaller molecules between cells. Hemichannel connexons form channels to the extracellular environment. ^{[12] [13] [14] [15]}

A gap junction or macula communicans is different from an ephaptic coupling that involves electrical signals external to the cells. ^{[16] [17]}

Structure

Connexon pairing across membranes bridges the gap between two cells and between vesicles to membranes.

In vertebrates, gap junction hemichannels are primarily homo- or hetero-hexamers of connexin proteins. Hetero-hexamers at gap junction plaques, help form a uniform intercellular space of 2-4 nm. ^[19] In this way hemichannels in the membrane of each cell are aligned with one another forming an intercellular communication path. ^[20]

Invertebrate gap junctions comprise proteins from the innexin family. Innexins have no significant sequence homology with connexins. ^[21] Though differing in sequence to connexins, innexins are similar enough to connexins to form gap junctions in vivo in the same way connexins do. ^{[22] [23] [24]}

The more recently characterized pannexin family, ^[25] which was originally thought to form intercellular channels (with an amino acid sequence similar to innexins ^[26] ) in fact functions as a single-membrane channel that communicates with the extracellular environment and has been shown to pass calcium and ATP. ^[27] This has led to the idea that pannexins may not form intercellular junctions in the same way connexins and innexins do and therefore should not use the same hemi-channel/channel naming. ^[28] Others have presented evidence based on genetic sequencing and overall functioning in tissues, that pannexins should still be considered part of the gap junction family of proteins despite structural differences. These researchers also note that there are still more groups of connexin orthologs to be discovered. ^[29]

Gap junction channels formed from two identical hemichannels are called homotypic, while those with differing hemichannels are heterotypic. In turn, hemichannels of uniform protein composition are called homomeric, while those with differing proteins are heteromeric. Channel composition influences the function of gap junction channels, and different connexins will not necessarily form heterotypic with all others. ^[30]

Before innexins and connexins were well characterized, the genes coding for the connexin gap junction channels were classified in one of three groups (A, B and C; for example, GJA1 , GJC1 ), based on gene mapping and sequence similarity. ^{[31] [32] [33]} However, connexin genes do not code directly for the expression of gap junction channels; genes can produce only the proteins that make up gap junction channels. An alternative naming system based on the protein's molecular weight is the most widely used (for example, connexin43=GJA1, connexin30.3=GJB4).

Levels of organization

In vertebrates, two pairs of six connexin proteins form a connexon. In invertebrates, six innexin proteins form an innexon. Otherwise, the structures are similar.

1. The connexin genes (DNA) are transcribed to RNA, which is then translated to produce a connexin.
2. One connexin protein has four transmembrane domains ^{[19] [34]}
3. Six connexin proteins create one connexon channel a hemichannel. When identical connexin proteins join to form one connexon, it is called a homomeric connexon. When different connexin proteins join to form one connexon, it is called a heteromeric connexon.
4. Two connexons, joined across a cell membrane, comprise a gap junction channel.
   When two identical connexons come together to form a gap junction channel, it is called a homotypic channel. When one homomeric connexon and one heteromeric connexon come together, it is called a heterotypic gap junction channel. When two heteromeric connexons join, it is also called a heterotypic gap junction channel.
5. Tens to thousands of gap junction channels cluster in areas to enable connexon pairs to form. ^[35] The macromolecular complex is called a gap junction plaque. Molecules other than connexins are involved in gap junction plaques including tight junction protein 1 and sodium channels. ^{[5] [6]}

Properties of connexon pairs

Light microscope images do not allow us to see connexons or innexons themselves but do let us see the fluorescing dye injected into one cell moving into neighboring cells when gap junctions are known to be present.

A connexon or innexon channel pair:

1. Allows for direct electrical communication between cells, although different hemichannel subunits can impart different single channel conductances, from about 30 pS to 500 pS.
2. Allows for chemical communication between cells through the transmission of small second messengers, such as inositol triphosphate ( IP
   _³ ) and calcium ( Ca²⁺
   ), ^[37] although different hemichannel subunits can impart different selectivities for particular molecules.
3. Generally allows transmembrane movement of molecules smaller than 485 daltons ^[38] (1,100 daltons through invertebrate gap junctions ^[39] ), although different hemichannel subunits may impart different pore sizes and different charge selectivity. Large biomolecules, including nucleic acids and proteins, are precluded from cytoplasmic transfer between cells through gap junction hemichannel pairs.
4. Ensures that molecules and current passing through the gap junction do not leak into the intercellular space.

Properties of connexons as hemichannels

Unpaired connexons or innexons can act as hemichannels in a single membrane, allowing the cell to exchange molecules directly with the exterior of the cell. It has been shown that connexons would be available to do this prior to being incorporated into the gap junction plaques. ^[35] Some of the properties of these unpaired connexons are listed below:

1. Pore or transmembrane channel size is highly variable, in the range of approximately 8-20Å in diameter. ^[40]
2. They connect the cytoplasm of the cell to the cell exterior and are thought to be in a closed state by default in order to prevent leakage from the cell. ^{[41] [42]}
3. Some connexons respond to external factors by opening up. Mechanical shear and various diseases can cause this to happen. ^[43]

Establishing further connexon properties different to those of connexon pairs, proves difficult due to separating their effects experimentally in organisms. ^[43]

Occurrence and distribution

Gap Junctions have been observed in various animal organs and tissues where cells contact each other. From the 1950s to 1970s they were detected in:

• Human islet of Langerhans, ^[44] myometrium, ^[45] and eye lens ^[46]
• Rat pancreas, liver, adrenal cortex, epididymis, duodenum, muscle, ^[47] and seminiferous tubules ^[48]
• Rabbit cornea, ^[49] ovary, ^[50] and skin ^[51]
• Monkey retina ^[52]
• Chick embryos ^[53]
• Frog embryos ^[54]
• Fish blastoderm ^[55]
• Crayfish nerves ^[56]
• Lamprey and Tunicate heart ^{[57] [58]}
• Goldfish and hamster pressure-sensing acoustico-vestibular receptors ^[59]
• Daphnia hepatic caecum ^[60]
• Cephalopod digestive epithelium ^[61]
• Hydra muscle ^[62]
• Cockroach hemocyte capsules ^[63]
• Reaggregated cells ^{[64] [65]}

Gap junctions have continue to be found in nearly all healthy animal cells that touch each other. Techniques such as confocal microscopy allow more rapid surveys of large areas of tissue. Tissues that were traditionally considered to have isolated cells such as in bone were shown to have cells that were still connected with gap junctions, however tenuously. ^[66] Exceptions to this are cells not normally in contact with neighboring cells such as blood cells suspended in blood plasma. Adult skeletal muscle is a possible exception to the rule though their large size makes it difficult to be certain of this. An argument used against skeletal muscle gap junctions is that if they were present gap junctions may propagate contractions in an arbitrary way through cells making up the muscle. However, other muscle types do have gap junctions which do not cause arbitrary contractions. ^[67] Sometimes the number of gap junctions are reduced or absent in diseased tissues such as cancers ^{[68] [69] [70]} or the aging process. ^[71]

Cell pannexin tree with white squares having communication proteins yet to be discovered

Since the discovery of innexins, pannexins and unnexins, gaps in our knowledge of intercellular communication are becoming more defined. Innexins look and behave similarly to connexins and can be seen to fill a similar role to connexins in invertebrates. Pannexins also look individually similar to connexins though they do not appear to easily form gap junctions. Of the over 20 metazoan groups connexins have been found only in vertebrata and tunicata. Innexins and pannexins are far more widespread including innexin homologues in vertebrates. ^{[72] [73]} The unicellular Trypanosomatidae parasites presumably have unnexin genes to aid in their infection of animals including humans. ^[74] The even smaller adenovirus has its own vinnexin, ^[75] apparently derived from an innexin, to aid its transmission between the virus's insect hosts.

The term gap junction cannot be defined by a single protein or family of proteins with a specific function. For example, gap junction structures are found in sponges, despite the absence of pannexins. While we are still at the early stages of understanding the nervous system of a sponge ^[76] the gap junctions of sponges may as yet indicate intercellular communications pathways. ^{[77] [78]}

Functions

At least five discrete functions have been ascribed to gap junction proteins:

1. Electrical and metabolic coupling between cells
2. Electrical and metabolic exchange through hemichannels
3. Tumor suppressor genes (Cx43, Cx32 and Cx36)
4. Adhesive function independent of conductive gap junction channel (neural migration in neocortex)
5. Role of carboxyl-terminal in signaling cytoplasmic pathways (Cx43)

In a more general sense, gap junctions may be seen to function at the simplest level as a direct cell to cell pathway for electrical currents, small molecules and ions. The control of this communication allows complex downstream effects on multicellular organisms.

Embryonic, organ and tissue development

In the 1980s, more subtle roles of gap junctions in communication have been investigated. It was discovered that gap junction communication could be disrupted by adding anti-connexin antibodies into embryonic cells. ^{[79] [80]} Embryos with areas of blocked gap junctions failed to develop normally. The mechanism by which antibodies blocked the gap junctions was unclear; systematic studies were undertaken to elucidate the mechanism. ^{[81] [82]} Refinement of these studies suggested that gap junctions were key in the development of cell polarity ^[83] and the left-right symmetry in animals. ^{[84] [85]} While signaling that determines the position of body organs appears to rely on gap junctions, so does the more fundamental differentiation of cells at later stages of embryonic development. ^{[86] [87] [88] [89] [90]}

Gap junctions were found to be responsible for the transmission of signals required for drugs to have an effect. ^[91] Conversely, some drugs were shown to block gap junction channels. ^[92]

The bystander effect and disease

Cell death

The bystander effect has its connotations of the innocent bystander being killed. When cells are dying or compromised due to disease or injury, messages are transmitted to neighboring cells by gap junctions. This can cause otherwise healthy bystander cells to also die. ^[93]

The bystander effect was later researched with regard to cells damaged by radiation or mechanical injury and in turn wound healing. ^{[94] [95] [96] [97] [98]} Disease seems to have an effect on the ability of gap junctions to fulfill their roles in wound healing. ^{[99] [100]} The oral administration of gap junction blockers to reduce the symptoms of disease in remote parts of the body is slowly becoming a reality. ^[101]

Tissue restructuring

While there has been a tendency to focus on the bystander effect in disease due to the possibility of therapeutic avenues, there is evidence that there is a more central role in normal development of tissues. Death of some cells and their surrounding matrix may be required for a tissue to reach its final configuration; gap junctions appear essential to this process. ^{[102] [103]} There are also more complex studies that try to combine our understanding of the simultaneous roles of gap junctions in both wound healing and tissue development. ^{[104] [105] [106]}

Disease

Mutations in connexins have been associated with many diseases in humans, including deafness, ^[107] heart atrial fibrillation (standstill) and cataracts. The study of these mutations has helped clarify some of the functions of connexins. ^{[108] [109]}

Hemichannels are thought to play a general role in the progression and severity of many diseases; this is in part due to hemichannels being an open door to the outside of each cell. ^[43]

Areas of electrical coupling

Gap junctions electrically couple cells throughout the body of most animals. Electrical coupling can be relatively fast acting and can be used over short distances within an organism. Tissues in this section have well known functions observed to be coordinated by gap junctions, with intercellular signaling happening in time frames of microseconds or less.

Heart

Effects of perinexal width on ephaptic coupling, for G gap = 0 nS

Gap junctions are particularly important in cardiac muscle: the signal to contract is passed efficiently through gap junctions, allowing the heart muscle cells to contract in unison. The importance is emphasized by a secondary ephaptic pathway for the signal to contract also being associated with the gap junction plaques. This redundancy in signal transmission associated with gap junction plaques is the first to be described and involves sodium channels rather than connexins. ^{[6] [110]}

Eye lens

Eye lens showing arrangement of fiber cells with photos of gap junction plaques from different regions

Precise control of light refraction, structural dimensions and transparency are key aspects of the eye lens structure that allow focusing by the eye. Transparency is aided by the absence of nerves and blood vessels from the lens, so gap junctions are left with a larger loading of intercellular communication than in other tissues reflected in large numbers of gap junctions. The crystallinity of the lens also means the cells and gap junctions are well ordered for systematic mapping of where the gap junction plaques are. As no cells are lost from the lens interior during the life of the animal, a complete map of the gap junctions is possible. ^[111]

The associated figure shows how the size, shape, and frequency of gap junction plaques change with cell growth. With growth, fiber cells are progressively isolated from more direct metabolite exchange with the aqueous humor through the capsule and lens epithelium. The isolation correlates with the classical circular shape of larger plaques shown in the yellow zone being disrupted. Changing the fiber cells' morphology requires the movements of vesicles through the gap junction plaques at higher frequencies in this area. ^[112]

Neurons

A gap junction located between neurons is often referred to as an electrical synapse. The electrical synapse was discovered using electrical measurements before the gap junction structure was described. Electrical synapses are present throughout the central nervous system and have been studied specifically in the neocortex, hippocampus, vestibular nucleus, thalamic reticular nucleus, locus coeruleus, inferior olivary nucleus, mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, ventral tegmental area, olfactory bulb, retina and spinal cord of vertebrates. ^[113]

There has been some observation of coupling in the locus coeruleus between weak neurons and glial cells and in the cerebellum between Purkinje neurons and Bergmann glial cells. It appears that astrocytes are coupled by gap junctions, both to other astrocytes and to oligodendrocytes. ^[114] Moreover, mutations in the gap junction genes Cx43 and Cx56.6 cause white matter degeneration similar to that observed in Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease and multiple sclerosis.

Connexin proteins expressed in neuronal gap junctions include mCX36, mCX57, and mCX45, with mRNAs for at least five other connexins (mCx26, mCx30.2, mCx32, mCx43, mCx47) detected but without immunocytochemical evidence for the corresponding protein within ultrastructurally-defined gap junctions. Those mRNAs appear to be downregulated or destroyed by micro interfering RNAs (miRNAs) that are cell-type and cell-lineage specific.

Astrocytes

An important feature of astrocytes is their high expression levels of the gap junction proteins connexin 30 (Cx30) and connexin 43 (Cx43). These proteins play crucial roles in regulating brain homeostasis through potassium buffering, intercellular communication, and nutrient transport. ^[115] Connexins typically form gap junction channels that allow direct intercellular communication between astrocytes. However, they can also form hemichannels that facilitate the exchange of ions and molecules with the extracellular space.

Studies have highlighted channel-independent functions of connexins, involving intracellular signaling, protein interactions, and cell adhesion. ^[116] Specifically, Cx30 has been shown to regulate the insertion of astroglial processes into synaptic clefts, which controls the efficacy of glutamate clearance. This, in turn, affects the synaptic strength and long-term plasticity of excitatory terminals, indicating a significant role in modulating synaptic transmission. Levels of Cx30 regulate synaptic glutamate concentration, hippocampal excitatory synaptic strength, plasticity, and memory. Astroglial networks have a physiologically optimized size to appropriately regulate neuronal functions. ^[117]

Cx30 is not limited to regulating excitatory synaptic transmission but also plays a crucial role in inhibitory synaptic regulation and broader neuronal network activities. ^[118] This highlights the importance of connexins in maintaining the intricate balance required for proper brain function.

Retina

Neurons within the retina show extensive coupling, both within populations of one cell type and between different cell types. ^[119]

Uterus

The uterine muscle (myometrium) remains in a quiescent relaxed state during pregnancy to maintain fetal development. Immediately preceding labor, the myometrium transforms into an activated contractile unit by increasing expression of connexin-43 (CX43, a.k.a. Gap Junction Alpha-1 protein, GJA1) facilitating gap junction (GJ) formation between individual myometrial cells. Importantly, the formation of GJs promotes communication between neighbouring myocytes, which facilitates the transfer of small molecules such as secondary messengers, metabolites, and small ions for electrical coupling. Consistent with all species, uterine myometrial contractions propagate from spontaneous action potentials as a result of sudden change in plasma membrane permeability. This leads to an increase of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration, facilitating action potential propagation through electrically coupled cells. ^[120] It has more recently been discovered that uterine macrophages directly physically couples with uterine myocytes through CX43, transferring Ca²⁺, to promote uterine muscle contraction and excitation during labor onset. ^[121]

Hemichannel function

Lens epithelial cells with gap junctions and hemichannels at the interface with fiber cells.

Lens fiber cells ends with gap junctions and hemichannels at the interface with fiber cells.

Hemichannels contribute to a cellular network of gap junctions and allow the release of sdenosine triphosphate, glutamate, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and prostaglandin E2 from cells, which can all act as messengers to cells otherwise disconnected from such messaging. ^[122] In this sense, a gap junction plaque forms a one-to-one relationship with the neighboring cell, daisy chaining many cells together. Hemichannels form a one to many relationship with the surrounding tissue.

On a larger scale, the one-to-many communication of cells is typically carried out by the vascular and nervous systems. This makes detecting the contribution of hemichannels to extracellular communication more difficult in whole organisms. With the eye lens, the vascular and nervous systems are absent, making reliance on hemichannels greater and their detection easier. At the interface of the lens with the aqueous humor (where the lens exchanges metabolites), both gap junction plaques and more diffused connexon distribution can be seen in the accompanying micrographs.

Discovery

Form to function

Well before the demonstration of the gap in gap junctions, they were seen at the junction of neighboring nerve cells. The close proximity of the neighboring cell membranes at the gap junction led researchers to speculate that they had a role in intercellular communication, in particular the transmission of electrical signals. ^{[56] [123] [124]} Gap junctions were also found to be electrically rectifying in the early studies and referred to as an electrical synapse ^{[125] [126]} but are now known to be bidirectional in general ^{[127] [128]} . Later, it was found that chemicals could also be transported between cells through gap junctions. ^[129]

Implicit or explicit in most of the early studies is that the area of the gap junction was different in structure to the surrounding membranes in a way that made it look different. The gap junction had been shown to create a micro-environment between the two cells in the extracellular space or gap. This portion of extracellular space was somewhat isolated from the surrounding space and also bridged by what we now call connexon pairs, which form even more tightly sealed bridges that cross the gap junction gap between two cells. When viewed in the plane of the membrane by freeze-fracture techniques, higher-resolution distribution of connexons within the gap junction plaque is possible. ^[130]

Connexin free islands are observed in some junctions. The observation was largely without explanation until vesicles were shown by Peracchia using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) thin sections to be systematically associated with gap junction plaques. ^[131] Peracchia's study was probably also the first study to describe paired connexon structures, which he called a globule. Studies showing vesicles associated with gap junctions and proposing the vesicle contents may move across the junction plaques between two cells were rare, as most studies focused on connexons rather than vesicles. A later study using a combination of microscopy techniques confirmed the early evidence of a probable function for gap junctions in intercellular vesicle transfer. Areas of vesicle transfer were associated with connexin free islands within gap junction plaques. ^[112] Connexin 43 has been shown to be necessary for the transfer of whole mitochondrias to neighboring cells, though whether the mitochondria is transferred directly through the membrane or within a vesicle has not been determined ^[132]

Electrical and chemical synapses

Because of the widespread occurrence of gap junctions in cell types other than nerve cells, the term gap junction became more generally used than terms such as electrical synapse or nexus. Another dimension in the relationship between nerve cells and gap junctions was revealed by studying chemical synapse formation and gap junction presence. By tracing nerve development in leeches with gap junction expression suppressed it was shown that the bidirectional gap junction (electrical nerve synapse) needs to form between two cells before they can grow to form a unidirectional chemical nerve synapse. ^[133] The chemical nerve synapse is the synapse most often truncated to the more ambiguous term nerve synapse.

Composition

Connexins

The purification ^{[134] [135]} of the intercellular gap junction plaques enriched in the channel forming protein (connexin) showed a protein forming hexagonal arrays in x-ray diffraction. Because of this, the systematic study and identification of the predominant gap junction protein ^[136] became possible. Refined ultrastructural studies by TEM ^{[137] [138]} showed protein occurred in a complementary fashion in both cells participating in a gap junction plaque. The gap junction plaque is a relatively large area of membrane observed in TEM thin section and freeze fracture (FF) seen filled with transmembrane proteins in both tissues and more gently treated gap junction preparations. With the apparent ability for one protein alone to enable intercellular communication seen in gap junctions ^[139] the term gap junction tended to become synonymous with a group of assembled connexins though this was not shown in vivo. Biochemical analysis of gap junction isolated from various tissues demonstrated a family of connexins. ^{[140] [141] [142]}

The ultrastructure and biochemistry of isolated gap junctions already referenced had indicated the connexins preferentially group in gap junction plaques or domains and connexins were the best characterized constituent. It has been noted that the organisation of proteins into arrays with a gap junction plaque may be significant. ^{[54] [143]} It is likely this early work was already reflecting the presence of more than just connexins in gap junctions. Combining the emerging fields of freeze-fracture to see inside membranes and immunocytochemistry to label cell components (Freeze-fracture replica immunolabelling or FRIL and thin section immunolabelling) showed gap junction plaques in vivo contained the connexin protein. ^{[144] [111]} Later studies using immunofluorescence microscopy of larger areas of tissue clarified diversity in earlier results. Gap junction plaques were confirmed to have variable composition being home to connexon and non-connexin proteins as well making the modern usage of the terms "gap junction" and "gap junction plaque" non-interchangeable. ^[8] To summarize, in early literature the term "gap junction" referred to the regular gap between membranes in vertebrates and non-vertebrates apparently bridged by "globules". The junction correlated with the cell's ability to directly couple with its neighbors through pores in their membranes. Then for a while gap junctions were only referring to a structure that contains connexins and nothing more was thought to be involved. Later, the gap junction "plaque" was also found to contain other molecules that helped define it and make it function.

The "plaque" or "formation plaque"

Immunofluorescence microscopy video of connexins being moved along microtubules to the surface of a cell at 2.7 times normal speed. ^[83]

Early descriptions of gap junctions, connexons or innexons did not refer to them as such; many other terms were used. It is likely that synaptic disks ^[145] were an accurate reference to gap junction plaques. While the detailed structure and function of the connexon was described in a limited way at the time the gross disk structure was relatively large and easily seen by various TEM techniques. Disks allowed researchers using TEM to easily locate the connexons contained within the disk like patches in vivo and in vitro. The disk or plaque appeared to have structural properties different from those imparted by the connexons/innexons alone. ^[62] It was thought that if the area of membrane in the plaque transmitted signals, the area of membrane would have to be sealed in some way to prevent leakage. ^[146] Later studies showed gap junction plaques are home to non-connexin proteins, making the modern usage of the terms "gap junction" and "gap junction plaque" non-interchangeable as the area of the gap junction plaque may contain proteins other than connexins. ^{[8] [112]} Just as connexins do not always occupy the entire area of the plaque, the other components described in the literature may be only long-term or short-term residents. ^{[147] [30] [148]}

Studies allowing views inside the plane of the membrane of gap junctions during formation indicated that a "formation plaque" formed between two cells prior to the connexins moving in. They were particle free areas—when observed by TEM FF, indicated very small or no transmembrane proteins were likely present. Little is known about what structures make up the formation plaque or how the formation plaque's structure changes when connexins and other components move in and out. One of the earlier studies of the formation of small gap junctions describes rows of particles and particle free halos. ^[149] With larger gap junctions they were described as formation plaques with connexins moving into them. The particulate gap junctions were thought to form 4–6 hours after the formation plaques appeared. ^[150] How the connexins may be transported to the plaques using tubulin is becoming clearer. ^{[83] [151]}

The formation of plaque and the non-connexin part of the classical gap junction plaque have been difficult for early researchers to analyse. It appears in TEM FF and thin section to be a lipid membrane domain that can somehow form a comparatively rigid barrier to other lipids and proteins. There has been indirect evidence for certain lipids being preferentially involved with the formation plaque, however this cannot be considered definitive. ^{[152] [153]} It is difficult to envisage breaking up the membrane to analyse membrane plaques without affecting their composition. By study of connexins still in membranes lipids associated with the connexins have been studied. ^[154] It was found that specific connexins tended to associate preferentially with specific phospholipids. As formation plaques precede connexins these results still give no certainty as to what is unique about the composition of plaques themselves. Other findings show connexins associate with protein scaffolds used in another junction, the zonula occludens ZO-1. ^[155] While this helps us understand how connexins may be moved into a gap junction formation plaque, the composition of the plaque itself is still somewhat sketchy. Some headway on the in vivo composition of the gap junction plaque is being made using TEM FRIL. ^{[147] [155]}

See also

• Gap junction modulation
• Gap junction protein
• Innexin
• Vinnexin
• Intercalated disc
• Ion channel
• Junctional complex
• Tight junction

References

1. Talukdar, S; Emdad, L; Das, SK; Fisher, PB (2 January 2022). "GAP junctions: multifaceted regulators of neuronal differentiation". Tissue Barriers. 10 (1): 1982349. doi:10.1080/21688370.2021.1982349. PMC   8794256 . PMID   34651545.
2. Brightman MW, Reese TS (March 1969). "Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain". J. Cell Biol. 40 (3): 648–677. doi:10.1083/jcb.40.3.648. PMC   2107650 . PMID   5765759.
3. Revel, J. P.; Karnovsky, M. J. (1 June 1967). "Hexagonal Array of Subunits in Intercellular Junctions of the Mouse Heart and Liver". Journal of Cell Biology. 33 (3): C7–12. doi:10.1083/jcb.33.3.C7. PMC   2107199 . PMID   6036535.
4. Hervé, Jean-Claude; Bourmeyster, Nicolas; Sarrouilhe, Denis; Duffy, Heather S. (May 2007). "Gap junctional complexes: From partners to functions". Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 94 (1–2): 29–65. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.010. PMID   17507078.
5. Gilleron, Jérome; Carette, Diane; Fiorini, Céline; Benkdane, Merieme; Segretain, Dominique; Pointis, Georges (March 2009). "Connexin 43 gap junction plaque endocytosis implies molecular remodelling of ZO-1 and c-Src partners". Communicative & Integrative Biology. 2 (2): 104–106. doi:10.4161/cib.7626. PMC   2686357 . PMID   19704902.
6. Ivanovic, Ena; Kucera, Jan P. (November 2021). "Localization of Na + channel clusters in narrowed perinexi of gap junctions enhances cardiac impulse transmission via ephaptic coupling: a model study". The Journal of Physiology. 599 (21): 4779–4811. doi: 10.1113/JP282105 . PMC   9293295 . PMID   34533834.
7. Yu, Xun Sean; Yin, Xinye; Lafer, Eileen M.; Jiang, Jean X. (June 2005). "Developmental Regulation of the Direct Interaction between the Intracellular Loop of Connexin 45.6 and the C Terminus of Major Intrinsic Protein (Aquaporin-0)". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280 (23): 22081–22090. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414377200 . PMID   15802270.
8. Gruijters, WTM (1989). "A non-connexon protein (MIP) is involved in eye lens gap-junction formation". Journal of Cell Science. 93 (3): 509–513. doi:10.1242/jcs.93.3.509. PMID   2691517.
9. Phelan, Pauline; Stebbings, Lucy A.; Baines, Richard A.; Bacon, Jonathan P.; Davies, Jane A.; Ford, Chris (January 1998). "Drosophila Shaking-B protein forms gap junctions in paired Xenopus oocytes". Nature. 391 (6663): 181–184. Bibcode:1998Natur.391..181P. doi:10.1038/34426. PMID   9428764. S2CID   205003383.
10. Phelan, Pauline; Bacon, Jonathan P.; A. Davies, Jane; Stebbings, Lucy A.; Todman, Martin G. (September 1998). "Innexins: a family of invertebrate gap-junction proteins". Trends in Genetics. 14 (9): 348–349. doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01547-9. PMC   4442478 . PMID   9769729.
11. Ortiz, Jennifer; Bobkov, Yuriy V; DeBiasse, Melissa B; Mitchell, Dorothy G; Edgar, Allison; Martindale, Mark Q; Moss, Anthony G; Babonis, Leslie S; Ryan, Joseph F (3 February 2023). "Independent Innexin Radiation Shaped Signaling in Ctenophores". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 40 (2): msad025. doi:10.1093/molbev/msad025. PMC   9949713 . PMID   36740225.
12. Furshpan, E. J.; Potter, D. D. (August 1957). "Mechanism of Nerve-Impulse Transmission at a Crayfish Synapse". Nature. 180 (4581): 342–343. Bibcode:1957Natur.180..342F. doi:10.1038/180342a0. PMID   13464833. S2CID   4216387.
13. Lampe, Paul D.; Lau, Alan F. (2004). "The effects of connexin phosphorylation on gap junctional communication". The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 36 (7): 1171–86. doi:10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00264-4. PMC   2878204 . PMID   15109565.
14. Lampe, Paul D.; Lau, Alan F. (2000). "Regulation of gap junctions by phosphorylation of connexins". Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 384 (2): 205–15. doi:10.1006/abbi.2000.2131. PMID   11368307.
15. Scemes, Eliana; Spray, David C.; Meda, Paolo (April 2009). "Connexins, pannexins, innexins: novel roles of "hemi-channels"". Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology. 457 (6): 1207–1226. doi:10.1007/s00424-008-0591-5. PMC   2656403 . PMID   18853183.
16. Martinez-Banaclocha, Marcos (13 February 2020). "Astroglial Isopotentiality and Calcium-Associated Biomagnetic Field Effects on Cortical Neuronal Coupling". Cells. 9 (2): 439. doi: 10.3390/cells9020439 . PMC   7073214 . PMID   32069981.
17. Parker, David (22 December 2022). "Neurobiological reduction: From cellular explanations of behavior to interventions". Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 987101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987101 . PMC   9815460 . PMID   36619115.
18. Peracchia, Camillo (1 April 1973). "Low Resistance Junctions in Crayfish". Journal of Cell Biology. 57 (1): 66–76. doi:10.1083/jcb.57.1.66. PMC   2108946 . PMID   4120611.
19. Maeda, Shoji; Nakagawa, So; Suga, Michihiro; Yamashita, Eiki; Oshima, Atsunori; Fujiyoshi, Yoshinori; Tsukihara, Tomitake (2009). "Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution". Nature. 458 (7238): 597–602. Bibcode:2009Natur.458..597M. doi:10.1038/nature07869. PMID   19340074. S2CID   4431769.
20. Perkins, Guy A.; Goodenough, Daniel A.; Sosinsky, Gina E. (1998). "Formation of the gap junction intercellular channel requires a 30 degree rotation for interdigitating two apposing connexons". Journal of Molecular Biology. 277 (2): 171–7. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1580. PMID   9514740.
21. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium (Dec 11, 1998). "Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology". Science. 282 (5396): 2012–2018. Bibcode:1998Sci...282.2012.. doi:10.1126/science.282.5396.2012. PMID   9851916.
22. Ganfornina, MD; Sánchez, D; Herrera, M; Bastiani, MJ (1999). "Developmental expression and molecular characterization of two gap junction channel proteins expressed during embryogenesis in the grasshopper Schistocerca americana". Developmental Genetics. 24 (1–2): 137–150. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<137::AID-DVG13>3.0.CO;2-7. hdl:10261/122956. PMID   10079517.
23. Starich, T. A. (1996). "eat-5 and unc-7 represent a multigene family in Caenorhabditis elegans involved in cell-cell coupling". J. Cell Biol. 134 (2): 537–548. doi:10.1083/jcb.134.2.537. PMC   2120886 . PMID   8707836.
24. Simonsen, Karina T.; Moerman, Donald G.; Naus, Christian C. (2014). "Gap junctions in C. elegans". Frontiers in Physiology. 5: 40. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00040 . PMC   3920094 . PMID   24575048.
25. Barbe, M. T. (1 April 2006). "Cell-Cell Communication Beyond Connexins: The Pannexin Channels". Physiology. 21 (2): 103–114. doi:10.1152/physiol.00048.2005. PMID   16565476.
26. Panchina, Yuri; Kelmanson, Ilya; Matz, Mikhail; Lukyanov, Konstantin; Usman, Natalia; Lukyanov, Sergey (June 2000). "A ubiquitous family of putative gap junction molecules". Current Biology. 10 (13): R473–R474. Bibcode:2000CBio...10.R473P. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00576-5 . PMID   10898987. S2CID   20001454.
27. Lohman, Alexander W.; Isakson, Brant E. (2014). "Differentiating connexin hemichannels and pannexin channels in cellular ATP release". FEBS Letters. 588 (8): 1379–1388. Bibcode:2014FEBSL.588.1379L. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.004. PMC   3996918 . PMID   24548565.
28. Sosinsky GE, Boassa D, Dermietzel R, Duffy HS, Laird DW, MacVicar B, Naus CC, Penuela S, Scemes E, Spray DC, Thompson RJ, Zhao H, Dahl G (2011-05-01). "Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels". Channels. 5 (3): 193–197. doi: 10.4161/chan.5.3.15765 . PMC   3704572 . PMID   21532340.
29. Slivko-Koltchik, Georgy A. (2019-02-26). "Are there gap junctions without connexins or pannexins?". BMC Ecol. Evol. 19 (Suppl 1). 46. Bibcode:2019BMCEE..19S..46S. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1369-4 . PMC   6391747 . PMID   30813901.
30. Hervé, JC; Bourmeyster, N; Sarrouilhe, D; Duffy, HS (May 2007). "Gap junctional complexes: from partners to functions". Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 94 (1–2): 29–65. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.010. PMID   17507078.
31. Hsieh, CL; Kumar, NM; Gilula, NB; Francke, U (Mar 1991). "Distribution of genes for gap junction membrane channel proteins on human and mouse chromosomes". Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics. 17 (2): 191–200. doi:10.1007/bf01232976. PMID   1849321. S2CID   44622463.
32. Kumar, NM; Gilula, NB (Feb 1992). "Molecular biology and genetics of gap junction channels". Seminars in Cell Biology. 3 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1016/s1043-4682(10)80003-0. PMID   1320430.
33. Kren, BT; Kumar, NM; Wang, SQ; Gilula, NB; Steer, CJ (Nov 1993). "Differential regulation of multiple gap junction transcripts and proteins during rat liver regeneration". The Journal of Cell Biology. 123 (3): 707–18. doi:10.1083/jcb.123.3.707. PMC   2200133 . PMID   8227133.
34. Oshima, A; Tani, K; Fujiyoshi, Y (1 Dec 2016). "Atomic structure of the innexin-6 gap junction channel determined by cryo-EM". Nat. Commun. 7: 13681. Bibcode:2016NatCo...713681O. doi:10.1038/ncomms13681. PMC   5146279 . PMID   27905396.
35. Lauf, Undine; Giepmans, Ben N. G.; Lopez, Patricia; Braconnot, Sébastien; Chen, Shu-Chih; Falk, Matthias M. (6 August 2002). "Dynamic trafficking and delivery of connexons to the plasma membrane and accretion to gap junctions in living cells". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (16): 10446–10451. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9910446L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162055899 . PMC   124935 . PMID   12149451.
36. Chang, Qing; Tang, Wenxue; Ahmad, Shoeb; Zhou, Binfei; Lin, Xi (2008). Schiffmann, Raphael (ed.). "Gap junction mediated intercellular metabolite transfer in the cochlea is compromised in connexin30 null mice". PLOS ONE. 3 (12). e4088. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.4088C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004088 . PMC   2605248 . PMID   19116647.
37. Alberts, Bruce (2002). Molecular biology of the cell (4th ed.). New York: Garland Science. ISBN   978-0-8153-3218-3.^{[ page needed ]}
38. Hu X, Dahl G (1999). "Exchange of conductance and gating properties between gap junction hemichannels". FEBS Lett. 451 (2): 113–117. Bibcode:1999FEBSL.451..113H. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00558-X . PMID   10371149. S2CID   19289550.
39. Loewenstein WR (July 1966). "Permeability of membrane junctions". Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 137 (2): 441–472. Bibcode:1966NYASA.137..441L. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x. PMID   5229810. S2CID   22820528.
40. Khan, Ali K.; Jagielnicki, Maciej; Bennett, Brad.C.; Purdy, Michael D.; Yeager, Mark (September 2021). "Cryo-EM structure of an open conformation of a gap junction hemichannel in lipid bilayer nanodiscs". Structure. 29 (9): 1040–1047.e3. doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.05.010. PMC   9616683 . PMID   34129834.
41. Goodenough, Daniel A.; Paul, David L. (April 2003). "Beyond the gap: functions of unpaired connexon channels". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 4 (4): 285–295. doi:10.1038/nrm1072. PMID   12671651. S2CID   18103080.
42. Laird, Dale W.; Lampe, Paul D. (December 2018). "Therapeutic strategies targeting connexins". Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (12): 905–921. doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.138. PMC   6461534 . PMID   30310236.
43. Van Campenhout, Raf; Gomes, Ana Rita; De Groof, Timo W.M.; Muyldermans, Serge; Devoogdt, Nick; Vinken, Mathieu (28 March 2021). "Mechanisms Underlying Connexin Hemichannel Activation in Disease". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (7): 3503. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073503 . PMC   8036530 . PMID   33800706.
44. Orci L, Malaisse-Lagae F, Amherdt M, et al. (November 1975). "Cell contacts in human islets of Langerhans". J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 41 (5): 841–4. doi:10.1210/jcem-41-5-841. PMID   1102552.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
45. Garfield, RE; Sims, SM; Kannan, MS; Daniel, EE (November 1978). "Possible role of gap junctions in activation of myometrium during parturition". Am. J. Physiol. 235 (5): C168–79. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1978.235.5.C168. PMID   727239. S2CID   31610495.
46. Goodenough, DA (November 1979). "Lens gap junctions: a structural hypothesis for nonregulated low-resistance intercellular pathways". Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18 (11): 1104–22. PMID   511455.
47. Friend DS, Gilula NB (June 1972). "Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues". J. Cell Biol. 53 (3): 758–76. doi:10.1083/jcb.53.3.758. PMC   2108762 . PMID   4337577.
48. McGinley D, Posalaky Z, Provaznik M (October 1977). "Intercellular junctional complexes of the rat seminiferous tubules: a freeze-fracture study". Anat. Rec. 189 (2): 211–31. doi:10.1002/ar.1091890208. PMID   911045. S2CID   19611753.
49. Kreutziger GO (September 1976). "Lateral membrane morphology and gap junction structure in rabbit corneal endothelium". Exp. Eye Res. 23 (3): 285–93. doi:10.1016/0014-4835(76)90129-9. PMID   976372.
50. Albertini, DF; Anderson, E. (Oct 1974). "The appearance and structure of intercellular connections during the ontogeny of the rabbit ovarian follicle with particular reference to gap junctions". J Cell Biol. 63 (1): 234–50. doi:10.1083/jcb.63.1.234. PMC   2109337 . PMID   4417791.
51. Prutkin L (February 1975). "Mucous metaplasia and gap junctions in the vitamin A acid-treated skin tumor, keratoacanthoma". Cancer Res. 35 (2): 364–9. PMID   1109802.
52. Raviola, E; Gilula, NB (Jun 1973). "Gap junctions between photoreceptor cells in the vertebrate retina". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 70 (6): 1677–81. Bibcode:1973PNAS...70.1677R. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1677 . PMC   433571 . PMID   4198274.
53. Bellairs, R; Breathnach, AS; Gross, M (Sep 1975). "Freeze-fracture replication of junctional complexes in unincubated and incubated chick embryos". Cell Tissue Res. 162 (2): 235–52. doi:10.1007/BF00209209. PMID   1237352. S2CID   38441429.
54. J. Cell Biol. 1974 Jul;62(1) 32-47.Assembly of gap junctions during amphibian neurulation. Decker RS, Friend DS.
55. Lentz TL, Trinkaus JP (March 1971). "Differentiation of the junctional complex of surface cells in the developing Fundulus blastoderm". J. Cell Biol. 48 (3): 455–72. doi:10.1083/jcb.48.3.455. PMC   2108114 . PMID   5545331.
56. Robertson, JD (February 1953). "Ultrastructure of two invertebrate synapses". Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 82 (2): 219–23. doi:10.3181/00379727-82-20071. PMID   13037850. S2CID   39294652.
57. Shibata, Y; Yamamoto, T (March 1977). "Gap junctions in the cardiac muscle cells of the lamprey". Cell Tissue Res. 178 (4): 477–82. doi:10.1007/BF00219569. PMID   870202. S2CID   21426059.
58. Lorber, V; Rayns, DG (April 1977). "Fine structure of the gap junction in the tunicate heart". Cell Tissue Res. 179 (2): 169–75. doi:10.1007/BF00219794. PMID   858161. S2CID   21604678.
59. Hama K, Saito K (February 1977). "Gap junctions between the supporting cells in some acoustico-vestibular receptors". J. Neurocytol. 6 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF01175410. PMID   839246. S2CID   30090247.
60. Hudspeth, AJ; Revel, JP (Jul 1971). "Coexistence of gap and septate junctions in an invertebrate epithelium". J. Cell Biol. 50 (1): 92–101. doi:10.1083/jcb.50.1.92. PMC   2108432 . PMID   5563454.
61. Boucaud-Camou, Eve (1980). "Junctional structures in digestive epithelia of a cephalopod". Tissue Cell. 12 (2): 395–404. doi:10.1016/0040-8166(80)90013-0. PMID   7414602.
62. Hand, AR; Gobel, S (February 1972). "The structural organization of the septate and gap junctions of Hydra". J. Cell Biol. 52 (2): 397–408. doi:10.1083/jcb.52.2.397. PMC   2108629 . PMID   4109925.
63. Baerwald RJ (1975). "Inverted gap and other cell junctions in cockroach hemocyte capsules: a thin section and freeze-fracture study". Tissue Cell. 7 (3): 575–85. doi:10.1016/0040-8166(75)90027-0. PMID   1179417.
64. Johnson R, Hammer M, Sheridan J, Revel JP (November 1974). "Gap junction formation between reaggregated Novikoff hepatoma cells". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71 (11): 4536–40. Bibcode:1974PNAS...71.4536J. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.11.4536 . PMC   433922 . PMID   4373716.
65. Knudsen, KA; Horwitz, AF (1978). "Toward a mechanism of myoblast fusion". Prog Clin Biol Res. 23: 563–8. PMID   96453.
66. Jones SJ, Gray C, Sakamaki H, et al. (April 1993). "The incidence and size of gap junctions between the bone cells in rat calvaria". Anat. Embryol. 187 (4): 343–52. doi:10.1007/BF00185892. PMID   8390141. S2CID   33191311.
67. Sperelakis, Nicholas; Ramasamy, Lakshminarayanan (2005). "Gap-junction channels inhibit transverse propagation in cardiac muscle". Biomed Eng Online. 4 (1): 7. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-4-7 . PMC   549032 . PMID   15679888.
68. Larsen WJ, Azarnia R, Loewenstein WR (June 1977). "Intercellular communication and tissue growth: IX. Junctional membrane structure of hybrids between communication-competent and communication-incompetent cells". J. Membr. Biol. 34 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1007/BF01870292. PMID   561191. S2CID   2831462.
69. Corsaro CM, Migeon BR (October 1977). "Comparison of contact-mediated communication in normal and transformed human cells in culture". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74 (10): 4476–80. Bibcode:1977PNAS...74.4476C. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4476 . PMC   431966 . PMID   270694.
70. Habermann, H; Chang, WY; Birch, L; Mehta, P; Prins, GS (January 2001). "Developmental exposure to estrogens alters epithelial cell adhesion and gap junction proteins in the adult rat prostate". Endocrinology. 142 (1): 359–69. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.1.7893 . PMID   11145599.
71. Kelley, Robert O.; Vogel, Kathryn G.; Crissman, Harry A.; Lujan, Christopher J.; Skipper, Betty E. (March 1979). "Development of the aging cell surface. Reduction of gap junction-mediated metabolic cooperation with progressive subcultivation of human embryo fibroblasts (IMR-90)". Exp. Cell Res. 119 (1): 127–43. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(79)90342-2. PMID   761600.
72. Phelan, Pauline (June 2005). "Innexins: members of an evolutionarily conserved family of gap-junction proteins". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1711 (2): 225–245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.10.004 . PMID   15921654.
73. Hervé, Jean-Claude; Phelan, Pauline; Bruzzone, Roberto; White, Thomas W. (December 2005). "Connexins, innexins and pannexins: Bridging the communication gap". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1719 (1–2): 3–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.013 . PMID   16359939.
74. Güiza, Juan; García, Aníbal; Arriagada, Javiera; Gutiérrez, Camila; González, Jorge; Márquez-Miranda, Valeria; Alegría-Arcos, Melissa; Duarte, Yorley; Rojas, Maximiliano; González-Nilo, Fernando; Sáez, Juan C.; Vega, José L. (February 2022). "Unnexins: Homologs of innexin proteins in Trypanosomatidae parasites". Journal of Cellular Physiology. 237 (2): 1547–1560. doi:10.1002/jcp.30626. PMID   34779505. S2CID   244116450.
75. Turnbull, Matthew W.; Volkoff, Anne-Nathalie; Webb, Bruce A.; Phelan, Pauline (July 2005). "Functional gap junction genes are encoded by insect viruses". Current Biology. 15 (13): R491–R492. Bibcode:2005CBio...15.R491T. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.052 . PMID   16005277.
76. Moroz, Leonid L.; Romanova, Daria Y. (23 December 2022). "Alternative neural systems: What is a neuron? (Ctenophores, sponges and placozoans)". Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 10: 1071961. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1071961 . PMC   9816575 . PMID   36619868.
77. Bergquist, P.R.; Green, C.R. (1977). "An ultrastructural study of settlement and metamorphosis in sponge larvae". Cah. Biol. Mar. 18: 289–302.
78. Green, C.R.; Bergquist, P.R. (1979). "Cell membrane specializations in the Porifera". Coll Int Cent Natn Res Scient. 291: 153–158.
79. Warner, Anne E.; Guthrie, Sarah C.; Gilula, Norton B. (1984). "Antibodies to gap-junctional protein selectively disrupt junctional communication in the early amphibian embryo". Nature. 311 (5982): 127–31. Bibcode:1984Natur.311..127W. doi:10.1038/311127a0. PMID   6088995. S2CID   2620476.
80. Warner, AE (2007). "The Use of Antibodies to Gap Junction Protein to Explore the Role of Gap Junctional Communication During Development". Ciba Foundation Symposium 125 - Junctional Complexes of Epithelial Cells. Novartis Foundation Symposia. Vol. 125. pp. 154–67. doi:10.1002/9780470513408.ch10. ISBN   9780470513408. PMID   3030673.
81. Bastide, B; Jarry-Guichard, T; Briand, JP; Délèze, J; Gros, D (April 1996). "Effect of antipeptide antibodies directed against three domains of connexin43 on the gap junctional permeability of cultured heart cells". J. Membr. Biol. 150 (3): 243–53. doi:10.1007/s002329900048. PMID   8661989. S2CID   20408672.
82. Hofer, A; Dermietzel, R (September 1998). "Visualization and functional blocking of gap junction hemichannels (connexons) with antibodies against external loop domains in astrocytes". Glia. 24 (1): 141–54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199809)24:1<141::AID-GLIA13>3.0.CO;2-R. PMID   9700496. S2CID   23234120.
83. Francis R, Xu X, Park H, et al. (2011). Brandner JM (ed.). "Connexin43 modulates cell polarity and directional cell migration by regulating microtubule dynamics". PLOS ONE. 6 (10): e26379. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...626379F. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026379 . PMC   3194834 . PMID   22022608.
84. Levin, Michael; Mercola, Mark (November 1998). "Gap junctions are involved in the early generation of left-right asymmetry". Dev. Biol. 203 (1): 90–105. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.137.4340 . doi:10.1006/dbio.1998.9024. PMID   9806775.
85. Levin, M; Mercola, M (November 1999). "Gap junction-mediated transfer of left-right patterning signals in the early chick blastoderm is upstream of Shh asymmetry in the node". Development. 126 (21): 4703–14. doi:10.1242/dev.126.21.4703. PMID   10518488.
86. Bani-Yaghoub, Mahmud; Underhill, T. Michael; Naus, Christian C.G. (1999). "Gap junction blockage interferes with neuronal and astroglial differentiation of mouse P19 embryonal carcinoma cells". Dev. Genet. 24 (1–2): 69–81. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1999)24:1/2<69::AID-DVG8>3.0.CO;2-M. PMID   10079512.
87. Bani-Yaghoub, Mahmud; Bechberger, John F.; Underhill, T. Michael; Naus, Christian C. G. (March 1999). "The effects of gap junction blockage on neuronal differentiation of human NTera2/clone D1 cells". Exp. Neurol. 156 (1): 16–32. doi:10.1006/exnr.1998.6950. PMID   10192774. S2CID   41420671.
88. Donahue, HJ; Li, Z; Zhou, Z; Yellowley, CE (February 2000). "Differentiation of human fetal osteoblastic cells and gap junctional intercellular communication". Am. J. Physiol., Cell Physiol. 278 (2): C315–22. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.2.C315. PMID   10666026. S2CID   9894657.
89. Cronier, L; Frendo, JL; Defamie, N; Pidoux, G; Bertin, G; Guibourdenche, J; Pointis, G; Malassine, A (November 2003). "Requirement of gap junctional intercellular communication for human villous trophoblast differentiation". Biol. Reprod. 69 (5): 1472–80. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016360 . PMID   12826585.
90. El-Sabban, ME; Sfeir, AJ; Daher, MH; Kalaany, NY; Bassam, RA; Talhouk, RS (September 2003). "ECM-induced gap junctional communication enhances mammary epithelial cell differentiation". J. Cell Sci. 116 (Pt 17): 3531–41. doi:10.1242/jcs.00656. PMID   12893812. S2CID   5057466.
91. Chaytor, AT; Martin, PE; Evans, WH; Randall, MD; Griffith, TM (October 1999). "The endothelial component of cannabinoid-induced relaxation in rabbit mesenteric artery depends on gap junctional communication". J. Physiol. 520 (2): 539–50. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00539.x. PMC   2269589 . PMID   10523421.
92. Srinivas, M; Hopperstad, MG; Spray, DC (September 2001). "Quinine blocks specific gap junction channel subtypes". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (19): 10942–7. Bibcode:2001PNAS...9810942S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191206198 . PMC   58578 . PMID   11535816.
93. Li Bi, Wan; Parysek, Linda M.; Warnick, Ronald; Stambrook, Peter J. (December 1993). "In vitro evidence that metabolic cooperation is responsible for the bystander effect observed with HSV tk retroviral gene therapy". Hum. Gene Ther. 4 (6): 725–31. doi:10.1089/hum.1993.4.6-725. PMID   8186287.
94. Little, JB; Azzam, EI; De Toledo, SM; Nagasawa, H (2002). "Bystander effects: intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals". Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 99 (1–4): 159–62. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006751. PMID   12194273.
95. Zhou, H; Randers-Pehrson, G; Suzuki, M; Waldren, CA; Hei, TK (2002). "Genotoxic damage in non-irradiated cells: contribution from the bystander effect". Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 99 (1–4): 227–32. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006769. PMID   12194291.
96. Lorimore, SA; Wright, EG (January 2003). "Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review". Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 79 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1080/0955300021000045664. PMID   12556327. S2CID   44821116.
97. Ehrlich, HP; Diez, T (2003). "Role for gap junctional intercellular communications in wound repair". Wound Repair Regen. 11 (6): 481–9. doi:10.1046/j.1524-475X.2003.11616.x. PMID   14617290. S2CID   25113646.
98. Coutinho, P.; Qiu, C.; Frank, S.; Wang, C.M.; Brown, T.; Green, C.R.; Becker, D.L. (July 2005). "Limiting burn extension by transient inhibition of Connexin43 expression at the site of injury". Br J Plast Surg. 58 (5): 658–67. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.12.022 . PMID   15927148.
99. Wang, C. M.; Lincoln, J.; Cook, J. E.; Becker, D. L. (November 2007). "Abnormal connexin expression underlies delayed wound healing in diabetic skin". Diabetes. 56 (11): 2809–17. doi: 10.2337/db07-0613 . PMID   17717278.
100. Rivera, EM; Vargas, M; Ricks-Williamson, L (1997). "Considerations for the aesthetic restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth following intracoronal bleaching". Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 9 (1): 117–28. PMID   9550065.
101. Mugisho, Odunayo O.; Aryal, Jyoti; Shorne, Avik; Lyon, Heather; Acosta, Monica L.; Green, Colin R.; Rupenthal, Ilva D. (15 February 2023). "Orally Delivered Connexin43 Hemichannel Blocker, Tonabersat, Inhibits Vascular Breakdown and Inflammasome Activation in a Mouse Model of Diabetic Retinopathy". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24 (4): 3876. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043876 . PMC   9961562 . PMID   36835288.
102. Cusato, K; Bosco, A; Rozental, R; Guimarães, CA; Reese, BE; Linden, R; Spray, DC (July 2003). "Gap junctions mediate bystander cell death in developing retina". J. Neurosci. 23 (16): 6413–22. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-16-06413.2003. PMC   6740641 . PMID   12878681.
103. Moyer, Kurtis E.; Saggers, Gregory C.; Ehrlich, H. Paul (2004). "Mast cells promote fibroblast populated collagen lattice contraction through gap junction intercellular communication". Wound Repair Regen. 12 (3): 269–75. doi:10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012310.x. PMID   15225205. S2CID   24363587.
104. Djalilian, A. R.; McGaughey, D; Patel, S; Seo, EY; Yang, C; Cheng, J; Tomic, M; Sinha, S; et al. (May 2006). "Connexin 26 regulates epidermal barrier and wound remodeling and promotes psoriasiform response". J. Clin. Invest. 116 (5): 1243–53. doi:10.1172/JCI27186. PMC   1440704 . PMID   16628254.
105. Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Kovacs, A.; Kanter, E. M.; Yamada, K. A. (February 2010). "Reduced expression of Cx43 attenuates ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction via impaired TGF-beta signaling". Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 298 (2): H477–87. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00806.2009. PMC   2822575 . PMID   19966054.
106. Ey B, Eyking A, Gerken G, Podolsky DK, Cario E (August 2009). "TLR2 mediates gap junctional intercellular communication through connexin-43 in intestinal epithelial barrier injury". J. Biol. Chem. 284 (33): 22332–43. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901619200 . PMC   2755956 . PMID   19528242.
107. Xu, Ji; Nicholson, Bruce J. (January 2013). "The role of connexins in ear and skin physiology — Functional insights from disease-associated mutations". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1828 (1): 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.06.024. PMC   3521577 . PMID   22796187.
108. Srinivas, Miduturu; Verselis, Vytas K.; White, Thomas W. (1 January 2018). "Human diseases associated with connexin mutations". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1860 (1): 192–201. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.024. PMC   5659969 . PMID   28457858.
109. White, Thomas W.; Paul, David L. (1999). "Genetic diseases and gene knockouts reveal diverse connexin functions". Annual Review of Physiology. 61 (1): 283–310. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.283. PMID   10099690.
110. Ivanovic, Ena; Kucera, Jan P. (2 November 2022). "Tortuous Cardiac Intercalated Discs Modulate Ephaptic Coupling". Cells. 11 (21): 3477. doi: 10.3390/cells11213477 . PMC   9655400 . PMID   36359872.
111. Gruijters, W.T.; Kistler, J.; Bullivant, S. (1 October 1987). "Formation, distribution and dissociation of intercellular junctions in the lens". Journal of Cell Science. 88 (3): 351–359. doi:10.1242/jcs.88.3.351. PMID   3448099.
112. Gruijters, W (2003). "Are gap junction membrane plaques implicated in intercellular vesicle transfer?". Cell Biology International. 27 (9): 711–717. Bibcode:2019BMCEE..19S..46S. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1369-4 . PMC   6391747 . PMID   30813901.
113. Connors; Long (2004). "Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain". Annu Rev Neurosci. 27: 393–418. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131128. PMID   15217338.
114. Orthmann-Murphy, Jennifer L.; Abrams, Charles K.; Scherer, Steven S. (May 2008). "Gap Junctions Couple Astrocytes and Oligodendrocytes". Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 35 (1): 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12031-007-9027-5. PMC   2650399 . PMID   18236012.
115. Pannasch, Ulrike; Vargová, Lydia; Reingruber, Jürgen; Ezan, Pascal; Holcman, David; Giaume, Christian; Syková, Eva; Rouach, Nathalie (2011-05-17). "Astroglial networks scale synaptic activity and plasticity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (20): 8467–8472. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.8467P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016650108 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3100942 . PMID   21536893.
116. Ghézali, Grégory; Dallérac, Glenn; Rouach, Nathalie (2016). "Perisynaptic astroglial processes: dynamic processors of neuronal information". Brain Structure and Function. 221 (5): 2427–2442. doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1070-3. ISSN   1863-2653. PMID   26026482.
117. Hardy, Eléonore; Moulard, Julien; Walter, Augustin; Ezan, Pascal; Bemelmans, Alexis-Pierre; Mouthon, Franck; Charvériat, Mathieu; Rouach, Nathalie; Rancillac, Armelle (2023-04-11). Eroglu, Cagla (ed.). "Upregulation of astroglial connexin 30 impairs hippocampal synaptic activity and recognition memory". PLOS Biology. 21 (4): e3002075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002075 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   10089355 . PMID   37040348. Cx30 upregulation increases the connectivity of astroglial networks, it decreases spontaneous and evoked synaptic transmission. This effect results from a reduced neuronal excitability and translates into an alteration in the induction of synaptic plasticity and an in vivo impairment in learning processes. Altogether, these results suggest that astroglial networks have a physiologically optimized size to appropriately regulate neuronal functions.
118. Hardy, Eléonore; Cohen-Salmon, Martine; Rouach, Nathalie; Rancillac, Armelle (September 2021). "Astroglial Cx30 differentially impacts synaptic activity from hippocampal principal cells and interneurons". Glia. 69 (9): 2178–2198. doi:10.1002/glia.24017. ISSN   0894-1491. PMID   33973274. Cx30 differentially alters the electrophysiological and morphological properties of hippocampal cell populations. They modulates both excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Astrocytes, via Cx30, are thus active modulators of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the hippocampus.
119. Béla Völgyi; Stewart A. Bloomfield (February 2009). "The diverse functional roles and regulation of neuronal gap junctions in the retina". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 10 (7): 495–506. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00070-3. PMC   3381350 . PMID   19491906.
120. Garfield, RE; Sims, SM; Kannan, MS; Daniel, EE (November 1978). "Possible role of gap junctions in activation of myometrium during parturition". Am. J. Physiol. 235 (5): C168–79. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1978.235.5.C168. PMID 727239. S2CID 31610495
121. Boros-Rausch, A., Shynlova, O., & Lye, S. J. (2021). "A Broad-Spectrum Chemokine Inhibitor Blocks Inflammation-Induced Myometrial Myocyte-Macrophage Crosstalk and Myometrial Contraction". Cells. 11 (1): 128. doi: 10.3390/cells11010128 PMID 35011690
122. Evans, W. Howard; De Vuyst, Elke; Leybaert, Luc (1 July 2006). "The gap junction cellular internet: connexin hemichannels enter the signalling limelight". Biochemical Journal. 397 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1042/BJ20060175. PMC   1479757 . PMID   16761954.
123. Robertson, J. D. (1963). Locke, Michael (ed.). Cellular membranes in development. New York: Academic Press. OCLC   261587041.^{[ page needed ]}
124. Robertson (1981). "Membrane structure". The Journal of Cell Biology. 91 (3): 189s–204s. doi:10.1083/jcb.91.3.189s. JSTOR   1609517. PMC   2112820 . PMID   7033238.
125. Furshpan EJ, Potter DD (1957). "Mechanism of Nerve-Impulse Transmission at a Crayfish Synapse". Nature. 180 (4581): 342–343. Bibcode:1957Natur.180..342F. doi:10.1038/180342a0. PMID   13464833. S2CID   4216387.
126. Furshpan EJ, Potter DD (1959). "Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish". The Journal of Physiology. 145 (2): 289–325. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006143. PMC   1356828 . PMID   13642302.
127. Purves, Dale; Williams, Stephen Mark, eds. (2001). Neuroscience (2nd ed.). Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates. ISBN   978-0-87893-742-4.
128. Principles of neural science (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill medical. 2013. ISBN   978-0-07-139011-8.
129. Payton, B. W.; Bennett, M. V. L.; Pappas, G. D. (December 1969). "Permeability and structure of junctional membranes at an electrotonic synapse". Science. 166 (3913): 1641–1643. Bibcode:1969Sci...166.1641P. doi:10.1126/science.166.3913.1641. PMID   5360587. S2CID   24701801.
130. Chalcroft, J. P.; Bullivant, S (October 1970). "An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze-fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture". J. Cell Biol. 47 (1): 49–60. doi:10.1083/jcb.47.1.49. PMC   2108397 . PMID   4935338.
131. Peracchia, C (April 1973). "Low resistance junctions in crayfish. II. Structural details and further evidence for intercellular channels by freeze-fracture and negative staining". J. Cell Biol. 57 (1): 54–65. doi:10.1083/jcb.57.1.54. PMC   2108965 . PMID   4120610.
132. Islam, M.; Das, S.; Emin, M.; et al. (2012). "Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow–derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury". Nat Med. 18 (5): 759–765. doi:10.1038/nm.2736. PMC   3727429 . PMID   22504485.
133. Todd KL, Kristan WB, French KA (November 2010). "Gap junction expression is required for normal chemical synapse formation". J. Neurosci. 30 (45): 15277–85. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2331-10.2010. PMC   3478946 . PMID   21068332.
134. Goodenough, D. A.; Stoeckenius, W. (1972). "The isolation of mouse hepatocyte gap junctions : Preliminary Chemical Characterization and X-Ray Diffraction". The Journal of Cell Biology. 54 (3): 646–56. doi:10.1083/jcb.54.3.646. PMC   2200277 . PMID   4339819.
135. Goodenough, D. A. (1974). "Bulk isolation of mouse hepatocyte gap junctions : Characterization of the Principal Protein, Connexin". The Journal of Cell Biology. 61 (2): 557–63. doi:10.1083/jcb.61.2.557. PMC   2109294 . PMID   4363961.
136. Kumar, N. M.; Gilula, NB (1986). "Cloning and characterization of human and rat liver cDNAs coding for a gap junction protein". The Journal of Cell Biology. 103 (3): 767–76. doi:10.1083/jcb.103.3.767. PMC   2114303 . PMID   2875078.
137. McNutt NS, Weinstein RS (December 1970). "The ultrastructure of the nexus. A correlated thin-section and freeze-cleave study". J. Cell Biol. 47 (3): 666–88. doi:10.1083/jcb.47.3.666. PMC   2108148 . PMID   5531667.
138. Chalcroft, J. P.; Bullivant, S (1970). "An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze-fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture". The Journal of Cell Biology. 47 (1): 49–60. doi:10.1083/jcb.47.1.49. PMC   2108397 . PMID   4935338.
139. Young; Cohn, ZA; Gilula, NB (1987). "Functional assembly of gap junction conductance in lipid bilayers: demonstration that the major 27 kd protein forms the junctional channel". Cell. 48 (5): 733–43. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90071-7. PMID   3815522. S2CID   39342230.
140. Nicholson BJ, Gros DB, Kent SB, Hood LE, Revel JP (1985). "The Mr 28,000 gap junction proteins from rat heart and liver are different but related". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 260 (11): 6514–6517. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)88810-X . PMID   2987225.
141. Beyer EC, Paul DL, Goodenough DA (1987). "Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver". The Journal of Cell Biology. 105 (6 Pt 1): 2621–2629. doi:10.1083/jcb.105.6.2621. PMC   2114703 . PMID   2826492.
142. Kistler J, Kirkland B, Bullivant S (1985). "Identification of a 70,000-D protein in lens membrane junctional domains". The Journal of Cell Biology. 101 (1): 28–35. doi:10.1083/jcb.101.1.28. PMC   2113615 . PMID   3891760.
143. Staehelin LA (May 1972). "Three types of gap junctions interconnecting intestinal epithelial cells visualized by freeze-etching". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69 (5): 1318–21. Bibcode:1972PNAS...69.1318S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1318 . PMC   426690 . PMID   4504340.
144. Gruijters, WTM; Kistler, J; Bullivant, S; Goodenough, DA (1987). "Immunolocalization of MP70 in lens fiber 16-17-nm intercellular junctions". The Journal of Cell Biology. 104 (3): 565–72. doi:10.1083/jcb.104.3.565. PMC   2114558 . PMID   3818793.
145. Robertson, JD (October 1963). "The occurrence of a subunit pattern in the unit membranes of club endings in mauthner cell synapses in goldfish brains". J. Cell Biol. 19 (1): 201–21. doi:10.1083/jcb.19.1.201. PMC   2106854 . PMID   14069795.
146. Loewenstein WR, Kanno Y (September 1964). "Studies on an epithelial (gland) cell junction. I. Modifications of surface membrane permeability". J. Cell Biol. 22 (3): 565–86. doi:10.1083/jcb.22.3.565. PMC   2106478 . PMID   14206423.
147. Ozato-Sakurai N, Fujita A, Fujimoto T (2011). Wong NS (ed.). "The distribution of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in acinar cells of rat pancreas revealed with the freeze-fracture replica labeling method". PLOS ONE. 6 (8): e23567. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...623567O. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023567 . PMC   3156236 . PMID   21858170.
148. Strauss, RE; Gourdie, RG (December 2020). "Cx43 and the Actin Cytoskeleton: Novel Roles and Implications for Cell-Cell Junction-Based Barrier Function Regulation". Biomolecules. 10 (12): 1656. doi: 10.3390/biom10121656 . PMC   7764618 . PMID   33321985.
149. Decker, RS; Friend, DS (July 1974). "Assembly of gap junctions during amphibian neurulation". J. Cell Biol. 62 (1): 32–47. doi:10.1083/jcb.62.1.32. PMC   2109180 . PMID   4135001.
150. Decker, RS (June 1976). "Hormonal regulation of gap junction differentiation". J. Cell Biol. 69 (3): 669–85. doi:10.1083/jcb.69.3.669. PMC   2109697 . PMID   1083855.
151. Lauf U, Giepmans BN, Lopez P, Braconnot S, Chen SC, Falk MM (August 2002). "Dynamic trafficking and delivery of connexons to the plasma membrane and accretion to gap junctions in living cells". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (16): 10446–51. Bibcode:2002PNAS...9910446L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162055899 . PMC   124935 . PMID   12149451.
152. Meyer, R; Malewicz, B; Baumann, WJ; Johnson, RG (June 1990). "Increased gap junction assembly between cultured cells upon cholesterol supplementation". J. Cell Sci. 96 (2): 231–8. doi:10.1242/jcs.96.2.231. PMID   1698798.
153. Johnson, R. G.; Reynhout, J. K.; Tenbroek, E. M.; Quade, B. J.; Yasumura, T.; Davidson, K. G. V.; Sheridan, J. D.; Rash, J. E. (January 2012). "Gap junction assembly: roles for the formation plaque and regulation by the C-terminus of connexin43". Mol. Biol. Cell. 23 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0141. PMC   3248906 . PMID   22049024.
154. Locke, Darren; Harris, Andrew L (2009). "Connexin channels and phospholipids: association and modulation". BMC Biol. 7 (1): 52. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-52 . PMC   2733891 . PMID   19686581.
155. Li X, Kamasawa N, Ciolofan C, et al. (September 2008). "Connexin45-containing neuronal gap junctions in rodent retina also contain connexin36 in both apposing hemiplaques, forming bihomotypic gap junctions, with scaffolding contributed by zonula occludens-1". J. Neurosci. 28 (39): 9769–89. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2137-08.2008. PMC   2638127 . PMID   18815262.

Further reading

• Harris, Andrew; Locke, Darren, eds. (2009). Connexins. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-489-6. ISBN   978-1-934115-46-6.

External links

• Gap+Junctions at the U.S. National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)