Ambonese Malay

Last updated
Ambonese Malay
Native to Indonesia
Region Maluku Islands
Native speakers
(250,000 cited 1987) [1]
1.4 million L2 speakers
Malay Creole
  • East Indonesian
    • Ambonese Malay
Dialects
Language codes
ISO 639-3 abs
Glottolog ambo1250

Ambonese Malay or simply Ambonese is a Malay-based creole language spoken on Ambon Island in the Maluku Islands of Eastern Indonesia. It was first brought by traders from Western Indonesia, then developed when the Dutch Empire colonised the Maluku Islands and was used as a tool by missionaries in Eastern Indonesia. Malay has been taught in schools and churches in Ambon, and because of this it has become a lingua franca in Ambon and its surroundings.

Contents

Christian speakers use Ambonese Malay as their mother tongue, while Muslims speak it as a second language as they have their own language. Muslims on Ambon Island particularly live in several areas in the city of Ambon, dominant in the Salahutu and Leihitu Peninsulas. While in the Lease Islands, the Christian Ambonese-speaking community is dominant in parts of Haruku, Saparua and Nusa Laut islands. Ambonese Malay has also become lingua franca in Buru, Seram, Geser-Gorom and the south-western Maluku Islands, though with different accents.

While originally derived from Malay, Ambonese Malay has been heavily influenced by European languages (Dutch and Portuguese) as well as the vocabularies or grammatical structures of indigenous languages. Muslims and Christian speakers tend to make different choices in vocabulary. Papuan Malay, a Malay creole spoken in the Indonesian part of New Guinea, is closely related to Ambonese Malay and is said to be a derivative of Ambonese Malay or Manado Malay or a mixture of both. According to Robert B. Allen and Rika Hayami-Allen, the eastern Indonesian forms of Malay have their roots in North Moluccan Malay. [2]

Morpho-syntax

Pronouns and person markers

In Ambonese Malay, personal pronouns typically have a full form, as well as another one or more shortened and/or variant forms. [3] The pronouns vary in terms of number - singular and plural, as well as clusivity, such as exclusive forms which exclude the addressee and inclusive forms which include the addressee. Such distinction is relatively typical of Austronesian languages. The following table provides a summary of all the pronouns found in Ambonese Malay:

Personal pronouns [3]
SingularPlural
Full (and variant) formShort formFull (and variant) formShort form
1st personExclusiveBetabet; beBat'ong (dialectal form recorded at Booi, Saparua Island)
InclusiveKat'ongtong
2nd personOse
Ale
os; se
al
Dorangdong
3rd personDiadi; deDorangdong
neuterOntua; Ongtua; Antua; Angtua Akangont'o; ant'u; ant'o kang; ang

Etymology

A number of observations can be made from the pronouns of Ambonese Malay which demonstrate etymology of certain pronouns:

  1. A number of pronouns are historically compounded. They are:
    • Bat'ong: Derives from beta 'I (1SG) + orang 'people; man' [3]
    • Kat'ong: Derives from *kita 'we (1PL) + orang 'people; man' [3]
    • Dorang: Derives from dia 'he; she; it (3SG) + orang 'people; man' [3]
  2. The 2nd person singular form ose is derived from the Portuguese pronoun voce, meaning 'you; thou'. [3]
  3. The 2nd person singular form ale is derived from a vernacular language. [3]

Politeness

Similarly to other Austronesian languages, such as Malay and Indonesian, the 2nd person singular and one of the 3rd person singular pronouns in Ambonese Malay vary in their degree of politeness. They are summarised in the following table: [3]

PersonPoliteness markingFull singular formShort singular form
2ndMarkedly impolite

Used in familiar and intimate relationships and when no outspoken respect needs to be expressed

Expresses intimacy. Used among peers, or to people of lower status.

ose

Ale

os

se

al

3rdMarkedly polite. Used by people of younger age to refer to adults and by adults to refer to people of equal or higher social rank.Ontua; ongtua; antua; angtua

It is also important to note that although in Ambonese the 1st person singular form beta is the standard form, in Classical Malay, it is used only by royal persons speaking to equals of rank. [3]

Syntactic positions

As previously mentioned, Ambonese pronouns consist of a full and one or more variant form. Full forms occur in every syntactic position. Variant form have a more restricted distribution and may be functionally different. [3] The following table summarises the set of full personal pronouns plus (in brackets) their variant forms according to context and syntactic function:

Personal pronouns and their syntactic function [3]
PersonOne-word sentenceSubjectObject (of verb or prep.)
1Sbetabeta (bet; be)beta
2Sose (os; se)

ale

ose (os; se)

ale (al)

ose (os; se)

ale

3S

3SN

dia

antua (etc.) ontua (etc.)

dia (di; de)

antua (etc.) ontua (etc.) akang

dia

antua (etc.) ontua (etc.) akang (kang; ang)

1Pkat'ongkat'ong (tong)kat'ong
2Pdorang (dong)dorang (dong)dorang (dong)
3Pdorang (dong)dorang (dong)dorang (dong)

From this table it follows that two factors determine whether a personal pronoun can be shortened: syntactic construction and syntactic position:

  • Except for the first person singular beta, first person plural kat'ong and third person singular dia, all pronouns can be shortened in one-word sentences. Third person singular neuter akang cannot form a one-word sentence altogether. [3]
  • In clauses all personal pronouns in Subject position may be shortened, except for third person singular neutral akang. [3]
  • In clauses all personal pronouns in Object position may be shortened, except for first person singular beta, first person plural kat'ong, second person ale and third person singular dia. [3]
  • Likewise, as preposition object all personal pronouns except for beta, ale, kat'ong and dia may be shortened. [3]

These facts show that se, os 'you', dong 'you', ont'o, ant'o, ant'u 'he; she' and dong 'they' have developed into doublets which are functionally (but not semantically) on a par with their full forms, while other short forms (bet, al, kang, ang) are phonological variants with a more restricted distribution. [3]

It is also important to note a number of syntactic variations within the functions of personal pronouns in Ambonese:

1) The 3rd person single dia 's/he; it' can be shortened to di or de when it is in Subject position, or when it is head of a Noun Phrase (NP) in object position. [3]

2) The 3rd person single antua (and angtua, ontua, ongtua) is also a modifier of head nominals in a phrase, thereby adding an aspect of deference. It adds a feature respect. [3]

(1)

Ant'o

3S

Onggo

O.

Ant'o Onggo

3S O.

Mr. Onggo [3]

(2)

Antua

3S

parangpuan

woman

sana

yonder

tu

that

Antua parangpuan sana tu

3S woman yonder that

the woman overthere [3]

3) The third form, akang, is a neater pronoun 'it', which also functions as a determiner. This form links up with the demonstratives ini and itu for deictic reference: it occurs as a single attribute before nouns, and in combination with postnominal tu.

(1)

Akang

3S.N

barang

things

tu

that

Akang barang tu

3S.N things that

those goods [3]

(2)

Akang

3S.N

gunting

scissors

di

where

mana?

 

Akang gunting di mana?

3S.N scissors where

Where are the scissors? [3] Mismatch in the number of words between lines: 4 word(s) in line 1, 3 word(s) in line 2 (help);

4) The short form of dorang, which is dong, also functions as a modifier in NPs to create collective plurals. [3]

(1)

mama

mother

dong

3P

mama dong

mother 3P

mother and the others (i.e. the children, her family, friends, etc.) [3]

(2)

Okto

O.

dong

3P

Okto dong

O. 3P

Okto and people who are like him [3]

(3)

Anis

A.

dong

3P

Anis dong

A. 3P

Anis and his friends [3]

Reduplication

Reduplication with personal pronouns is not frequent. The following examples denote a concept "referent of pronoun plus persons who are alike": [3]

(1)

De

3S

seng

not

datang

come

lia

see

kat'ong-kat'ong

REDUP~1P

De seng datang lia kat'ong-kat'ong

3S not come see REDUP~1P

He doesn't come to visit people like us [3]

(2)

Macang

kind

ose-ose

REDUP~2S

bagini

like this

seng

not

bisa

can

dapa

get

akang

3S.N

Macang ose-ose bagini seng bisa dapa akang

kind REDUP~2S {like this} not can get 3S.N

People like you now can't get it [3]

Word Order

Ambonese Malay is a SVO (subject-verb-object) language. Its basic word order has the subject in initial position, followed by the verb and then the object, as shown below. 'Subject, verb, object' are labelled 'S, V, O' respectively:

Pombo

dove

S

kasi

give

V

tongka

stick

O

satu

one to

 

for Kes.

monkey

 

Pombo kasi tongka satu {for Kes}.

dove give stick {one to} monkey

S V O {} {}

"Dove gave a stick to Monkey." [4]

Negation

Negation in Ambonese is sentential rather than constituent. Negation is predominantly expressed by five free morphemes that are treated as adverbs, modifying predicates, clauses or parts of the sentence as opposed to specific elements (such as single verbs or nominals). These morphemes are listed below alongside their common variants and English equivalents:

Constituent order

Ambonese negators are typically positioned between the subject and the VO-group. This word order is typical of SVO languages. [5] In the following example, the subject pronoun de precedes the negator seng (represented here as sem), and the verb group headed by the verb bisa follows it.

Der

From

tadi

just now

de

3S

so

PHA

sem

no

bisa

can

k

to

atas

top

lei.

also

Der tadi de so sem bisa k atas lei.

From {just now} 3S PHA no can to top also

"Just now she already couldn't go up (the tree) anymore." [6]

Summary of distinguishing features

  1. All negators except tar/tra can be used as one-word sentences in response to a Yes-No question. [7]
  2. All negators except jangang/jang can be used in declarative and interrogative sentence types.
  3. Only jangang/jang can be used in an imperative sentence.

These features will be explored in greater detail below.

Seng

Seng is the most commonly used negator.

Although Ambonese generally operates on the premise of sentential negation, seng can be used in a marked word order to narrow the scope of negation to single verbs or nominals. Seng moves rightwards in the clause, shifting the focus of negation to the word it immediately precedes. In the first example below, seng occurs in its default position between the subject de and the verb group headed by kar'ja, modifying the verb group kar'ja bat'ul in a general sense. In the second example, seng is integrated into the verb group itself, immediately preceding and placing the emphasis of negation on the verbal modifier bat'ul.

De

3S

seng

no

karj'a

work

bat'ul.

right

De seng karj'a bat'ul.

3S no work right

"He doesn't work well." [7]

De

3S

karj'a

work

seng

no

bat'ul.

right

De karj'a seng bat'ul.

3S work no right

"He works not well." [7]

Seng also collocates with modal auxiliary usa to express a lack of necessity:

Papa,

Father

seng

no

usa

necessary

mara,

angry

deng

and

seng

no

usa

necessary

malu.

ashamed

Papa, seng usa mara, deng seng usa malu.

Father no necessary angry and no necessary ashamed

"Father, you don't have to be angry and you don't have to be ashamed." [8]

Seng is also used with the reduplicated interrogative pronoun apa, meaning 'what', in a fixed expression to denote 'nothing', or 'not anything':

Seng

No

apa-apa.

REDUP~what

Seng apa-apa.

No REDUP~what

"It's nothing; it doesn't matter." [9]

Tar/tra

Unlike all other Ambonese negators, tar/tra cannot form a one-word sentence. It is typically regarded as a marker of emphatic negation, and can be used alongside seng and with reduplication to achieve even greater emphasis. In the example below, ampas is reduplicated, following both negators seng and tra.

Ose

2S

nanti

wait

seng

no

ampas,

waste

ose

2S

tra

no

ampas

waste

lei!

also

Ose nanti seng ampas, ose tra ampas lei!

2S wait no waste 2S no waste also

"You just wait; nothing, not even waste of you will remain (i.e. I won't spare you at all!)" [7]

Tar/tra also commonly collocates with:

  • existential verb ada 'be (somewhere)'
  • bai 'good'
  • modal auxiliary bole 'may, be allowed'

Tar

no

ada

be

uba

medicine

tu!

that

Tar ada uba tu!

no be medicine that

"There was no medicine at all!" [10]

Dong

3P

seng

no

piker

think

akang,

3S.N

kata

CONJ

itu

that

tar

no

bae.

good

Dong seng piker akang, kata itu tar bae.

3P no think 3S.N CONJ that no good

"They don't think about it, <that is> that it is really bad." [10]

Tar

no

bole

may

tu!

that

Tar bole tu!

no may that

"You may not do that!" [10]

Bal'ong/blong

Bal'ong marks both negation and the phasal aspect 'yet', denoting 'not yet'.

Dong

3P

su

PHA

makang

eat

deng

and

bal'ong

not yet

gal'ap

dark

lai.

also

Dong su makang deng bal'ong gal'ap lai.

3P PHA eat and {not yet} dark also

"They have eaten and it isn't dark yet <so just let the children play outside>." [10]

Similar to tar/tra it can also be used as a marker of emphatic negation alongside a reduplicated verb, as in the example below where bal'ong co-occurs with the reduplicated verb pulang-pulang:

An-ana

REDUP~child

tu,

that

dong

3P

bilang:

say

"E!

INTER

Mama

mother

tu,

that

ant'o

3S

bal'ong

not yet

pulang-pulang."

REDUP~return

An-ana tu, dong bilang: "E! Mama tu, ant'o bal'ong pulang-pulang."

REDUP~child that 3P say INTER mother that 3S {not yet} REDUP~return

"The children said: 'Hey, mother, she still has not come home yet.'" [11]

Bukang

According to van Minde's research findings, bukang is the least commonly used negator in Ambonese Malay. [12] It expresses a 'contrast which implies an alternative' - bukang X means 'not X (but on the contrary) Y)': [12]

Dia

3S

tu

that

bukang

no

guru

teacher

mar

but

soldadu.

soldier

Dia tu bukang guru mar soldadu.

3S that no teacher but soldier

"He wasn't a teacher, but a soldier." [12]

It may also occur in sentences with contrastive stress, combined with the use of 'higher pitch and articulatory strength' [12] to articulate the constituents that are the focus of the negation. In the examples below, these specific constituents are capitalised to demonstrate prosodic emphasis:

Bukang

No

seng

no

BISA,

can

seng

no

DAPA

get

dangsa

dance

deng

with

nona-nona.

REDUP~girl

Bukang seng BISA, seng DAPA dangsa deng nona-nona.

No no can no get dance with REDUP~girl

"Not that he COULD not (dance), he did not GET a dance(-partner) from among the girls." [13]

Jangang/jang

Jangang does not occur in declarative or interrogative sentences but is used to express negative imperatives, as in the example below - 'don't go to China.'

Seng

No

usa,

necessary

jang

don't

pi

go

di

to

tan

land

Cina.

China

Seng usa, jang pi di tan Cina.

No necessary don't go to land China

"That’s not necessary, don’t go to China." [13]

It is also used in several 'short formulaic expressions': [14]

Jang

Don't

mira

angry

e.

INTER

Jang mira e.

Don't angry INTER

"Excuse me; Sorry." [14]

Jang

Don't

bilang

say

lai!

also

Jang bilang lai!

Don't say also

"Incredible! Unbelievable! Terrible!" [14]

Negators and common collocations

Lai

In the above example, the particle lai is used in sentence-final position as an exclamative marker. However, it can also be used with seng, bal'ong, and jangang in non-exclamative sentences to denote, 'anymore; again', or 'still':

De

3S

so

PHA

seng

no

mo

FUT

pi

go

deng

with

beta

1S

lei.

also

De so seng mo pi deng beta lei.

3S PHA no FUT go with 1S also

"He won't go with me anymore." [14]

Jang

Don't

lei.

also

Jang lei.

Don't also

"Don't do that anymore/again." [14]

Bal'ong

Not yet

lei.

also

Bal'ong lei.

{Not yet} also

"Still not yet." [14]

Ka

Ka combines with negators seng and bal'ong to form a sentence-final tag for interrogative sentences:

Se

2S

su

PHA

makang

eat

ka

Q

blong?

not yet

Se su makang ka blong?

2S PHA eat Q {not yet}

"Have you eaten already?" [15]

Pap

Father

mara

angry

ka

Q

seng?

no

Pap mara ka seng?

Father angry Q no

"Are you angry, or not?" [15]

In the above example the tag ka seng has converted a yes–no question "Are you angry?" into an alternative question "Are you angry, or not?"

Phonology

Ambonese Malay has phonemic word stress, by which is meant that the position of stress within a word is unforeseeable (van Minde 1997, p. 21) . Van Minde (1997, p. 22) uses the term “lexically reduplicated morphemes” which means that both of the roots that compose the morpheme contain an important (e.g. stressed) syllable. However, in the case of duplicated monosyllables, neither of the roots are perceptible as regards stress. Each accent on the syllables will be marked even if the morpheme is made up of a duplicated monosyllable. The reason being is to differentiate them from morphemes that are monomorphemic (van Minde 1997, p. 22). Examples of this would be (p. 22):

/g’igi/ ‘tooth’; /pomp’om/ in: /s’agu pomp’om/ k.o sago-cake roasted in cartridge-cases.

Compare the examples with the following (p. 23):

/’ eleK’ eleK/ ‘oil-lamp made from glass jar’; /t’omit’ omi/ k.o. cherry-like fruit.

Wordstress is the only different feature in a number of minimal pairs (p. 23):

/b’acaŋ/ Bacan (island) - /bac’aŋ/ k.o. fruit
/p’araŋ/ ‘machete’ - /par’aŋ/ ‘war’
/t’are/ ‘to attract s.t.’ - /tar’e/ ‘tight

Vowel phonemes

Ambonese contains 5 vowel phonemes as illustrated in the chart (van Minde 1997, p. 24):

Vowel system
FrontCentralBack
Highiu
Non-higheao

Ambonese Malay do not have phonemic glottal stop /ʔ/ but phonetically the glottal stop is noticed word-initially, morpheme-initially after a vowel, and morpheme-medially between like vowels (van Minde 1997, p. 24). Examples are (p. 24):

/’ose/ [ʔ’ ose] ‘you’
/baku’atur/ [baku#ʔ’atur] ‘to arrange with one another’

In addition, there might be borrowed words from other indigenous languages, there is individual variation, and [ʔ] is occasionally heard (van Minde 1997, p. 24):

/pa’isal/ [paʔ ‘isal] = [pa’isal] k.o. small proa;
/n’oul. [n’oʔul] = [n’oul] k.o. fish

Nasalised vowels happen expectedly before nasal consonants belonging to the same syllable. Due to this, van Minde considers nasalization as a “phonetic phenomenon”. He gave some examples as well (1997, pp. 24–25):

/’aNboŋ/ [ʔ’ām.bõŋ] ‘Ambon; Ambonese’
/kaNp’iNjaŋ/ [kãm.p’ĩñ.jãŋ] ‘churchbell’

Nasalisation is invalid past syllable-boundaries like for example (p. 24-25):

/an’ioŋ/ [ʔa.n’i.yõŋ] ‘rolled up cloth to support load carried on head’
/ba#’aNbur/ [ba. ʔ’āmbur] ‘to strew, scatter (repeatedly)

High front unrounded /i/

According to van Minde (1997, p. 25), the high front unrounded vowel /i/ is always perceived as [i], and it always take place in non-final and final closed and open syllables. /i/ in final syllables (whether they are open or closed) can be replaced by /e/ however this only applies in some polysyllabic morphemes. Though /i/ can be replaced by /e/, it does not work in reverse thus it can’t be said the conflict between these two phonemes is negated in that position and environment (van Minde 1997, p. 25).

Besides position and stress, further restrictions on the alternation /i ≈ e/ is given in two phonological rules (PR). The change in final unstressed syllables of polysyllabic morphemes is not attested in (van Minde, 1997 p. 25):

PR1: final syllables ending in /s/;

PR2: open final syllables when the penultimate syllable contains /u/ or /i/

Van Minde (1997, p. 25) regards /i/ as a ‘heavy phoneme’ wherever there is a change /i ~ e/, which means in environments that are different from those interpreted by PR1 and PR2. The definition of ‘heavy phoneme’ is defined as “consists of one or more optional distinctive features in addition to the basic distinctive features, whereas a basic phoneme consists of basic distinctive features only” (Ebeling 1967; Stokhof 1975). Van Minde deduces that /i/ is a heavy phoneme in environments excluded by PR1 and PR2; /e/ being its basic phoneme and [relative highness] is a voluntary feature. Examples are given in the following (p. 25):

/katiNd’isaŋ/ [katĩnd’isāŋ] ‘to talk or rave while sleep’
/ir/ [ʔir] ‘drunk’
  • closed final syllables (p. 26):
/k’ukis/ [k’ukis *k’ukes] ‘biscuit’
/kac’il/ [kac’il *kac’el] ‘small’
  • open final syllables (p. 26):
/p’uti/ [p’uti *p’ute] ‘white’
/h’ari ≈ h’are/ ‘day’

Mid front unrounded vowel /e/

The mid front unrounded vowel /e/ is perceived as [e] (or [ē] due to nasalization). Examples are followed (p. 26):

/b’esi/ [b’esi] ‘iron/steel’
/b’erkaT/ [b’erkat-] ‘divine blessing’

The phonemic status of /e/ versus /i/ is attested by the followed minimal pairs (p. 26):

/’ina/ ‘mother’ - /’ena/ ‘tasty, delicious’
/p’ici/ ‘to peel’ - /p’eci/ ‘mud’

The examples illustrated distinctly that /i/ is resistant to /e/ in morpheme-final syllables, hence the change /i ≈ e/ in final syllables under the previous restrictions stated in the phonological rules cannot be clarified as neutralization (van Minde 1997, pp. 26–27).

Low central vowel /a/

The low central vowel in Ambonese Malay is perceived as [a] (or [ā] due to nasalization). Examples are followed (p. 27):

/’añer/ [ʔ’añer] ‘bad fishy smell’
/kal’apa/ [kal’apa] ‘coconut’

The minimal pairs attest the resistance between /a/ and /i/ (p. 27):

/s’atu/ ‘one’ - /s’itu/ ‘there’
/bal’a/ ‘to split s.t.’ - /bal’i/ ‘to buy s.t.’

The opposition between /a/ and /e/ is shown by the presented minimal pairs (p. 27):

/cak’a/ ‘to strangle s.o.’ - /cak’e/ ‘(vulg) to eat, stuff o.s.’
/b’aca/ ‘to read’ - /b’eca/ ‘pedicab’

High back rounded vowel /u/

/u/ happens in non-final and final closed and open position. This high back rounded vowel is always perceived as [u] (or [ũ] due to nasalization). However, /u/ in final unstressed syllables (whether open or closed) consistently alternates with /o/ when in certain polysyllabic morphemes (van Minde 1997, p. 27). In addition, not all /o/ in this position and environment alternates with /u/, thus these two phonemes are not balanced. According to van Minde (1997, p. 27), the change /u ≈ o/ in final unstressed syllables of polysyllabic morphemes is not proven in (p. 27):

PR3: open final syllables when the penultimate syllable have /u/ or /i/

This situation is alike to the change between the high and mid front vowels /i ≈ e/, where /u/ is seen as a heavy phoneme, /o/ as the basic phoneme and [relative phoneme] is the optional feature. The following examples prove this assertion (p. 28):

/t’obu/ [t’obu] ≈ /t’obo/ [t’obo] ‘sugar cane’
/’uNpaŋ/ [ʔ’ ũmpãŋ] ‘bait’
  • Closed final syllables (p. 28):
/c’aNpur ≈ c’aNpor/ ‘to mix’
/c’abuT ≈ c’aboT/ ‘let’s go!’
  • Open final syllables (p. 29):
/tapar’egu ≈ tapar’ego/ ‘to do s.t. hurriedly’
/cap’atu ≈ cap’ato/ ‘shoe’
  • Minimal pairs shown to the resistance between /u/ and /i/ (p. 29):
/k’utu/ ‘louse’ - /k’uti/ ‘snap’
/g’ula/ ‘sugar’ - /g’ila/ ‘mad’
  • The resistance between /u/ and /e/ can be shown by (p. 29):
/b’ulaŋ/ ‘moon, month’- /b’elaŋ/ in: /aruNb’ aI b’elaŋ/ k.o. large proa

The resistance between /u/ and /a/ is attested by:

/’uru/ ‘to massage’ – /’aru/ ‘Aru Islands’

Mid back rounded vowel /o/

The mid back rounded vowel /o/ is seen as [o] (or [õ] due to nasalization). Examples are followed (p. 29):

/’oraŋ/ [‘orãŋ] ‘man, human being’
/b’odo/ [b’odo] ‘stupid’
  • The minimal pair show the phoneme status of /o/ vis-à-vis /i/ (p. 30):
/b’oŋko/ ‘bowed (of persons)’ – /b’eŋko/ ‘bend sideways (of persons)’
  • The phoneme status of /o/ against /a/ is shown by (p. 30):
/kat’oŋ/ ‘we’ - /kat’ aŋ/ ‘crab’
  • The resistance between /o/ and /u/ is proven by (p. 30):
/h’ori/ ‘to wander about’ – /h’uri/ ‘having lost its original shape’

Archiphoneme /U/

Archiphoneme /U/ is proposed in unstressed position after a vowel other than /u/ and instantly before a syllable or morpheme boundary by van Minde (1997). This is because there is no opposition between /u/ and /w/ in this environment (p. 31):

/l’aUtaŋ/ [l’autãŋ] ‘deep-sea’

The second reason proposed by van Minde (1997, p. 32) is that /U/ occurs after a consonant and directly before a stressed vowel (p. 32):

/bU’aya/ [bu’aya] ‘crocodile’

Nevertheless, not every pattern /Cw’V/ is collateral by a sequence /CU’V/ (p. 32):

/swaK/ [swak-] ‘weak, feeble’

Archiphoneme /I/

This results from the neutralization of the resistance /i/-/y/ in unstressed position after a vowel or instantly before a stressed vowel (p. 32):

/m’uI/ [m’ui, muy] ‘aunt’
  • Van Minde (1997, p. 32) showed some examples of /I/ before a stressed vowel:
/I’a/ [I’a, iy’a] ‘yes (formal)’
/bI’asa/ [bi’asa] ‘normal, usual’
  • The resistance of /i/ and /y/ is shown by (p. 33):
/t’iU/ [t’iyu] ‘uncle’

Consonants

There are 19 consonants phonemes and 4 consonant archiphonemes in Ambonese Malay and they are charted below (van Minde 1997, pp. 40–41):

Consonant system
LabialAlveolarPalatalVelarGlottal
ArchiphonemePTNK
Stopp bt dc jk g
Nasalmnñŋ
Fricativefsh
Liquidl, r
Semivowelwy

Archiphonemes /P, T, K, N/

These archiphonemes is a consequence from the neutralization of the opposition between /p/- /b/, /t/-/d/, and /k/-/g/ respectively in two positions and under certain conditions (van Minde 1997, p. 40):

1. Frequency of /P, T, K/ is especially high in word-final position. Most words with /P, T, K/ in this position are borrowed words from Dutch (van Minde 1997, p. 41). This is due to the many words of Malay origin to have lost final stops *p, *t, *k, or *ʔ. Example: *tutup > tutu ‘to close’.

Wordfinally the archiphonemes /P, T, K/ have a voiceless unreleased realization. Examples are shown (p. 41):

/keP/ [kep-] ‘notch, nick’ (<Dukeep)
/’aNbaK/ [ʔ’ãmbak-] ‘character, habit’

A significant number of polysyllabic words with non-final stress have a doublet without final /P, T, K/ in non emphatic speech (p. 41):

/r’unuT ≈ runu/ ‘fibroid material growing on palm trees’

In addition, van Minde (1997, p. 42) states that /P, T, K/ are “heavy archiphonemes” in this position and environment.

2. The archiphonemes /P, T, K/ have a voiceless unreleased realization in syllable-final position right before a stop, a nasal, fricative /s/, or the lateral /l/. Example is shown (p. 42):

/b’aKso/ [b’ak-so] ‘(Chinese) meatball’

Archiphoneme /N/ is also developed from the neutralization of the opposition between /m, n, ñ/ and /ŋ/ before their own homorgonaic obstruents /l/ (van Minde 1997, p. 42). Example is followed (p. 42):

/naNl’ohi/ [nãnl’ohi] Nanlohi (clan name)

Stops

The voiceless and voiced stops of the series /p, b, t, d, c, j, k, g/ are found in word-medial position and word-initial. /p, b/ are bilabials, /d/ is an apico-alveolar, /c, j/ are laminal-palatals, /t/ is an apico-alveodental, /k, g/ are dorsal-velars. Relevant (near) minimal pairs are shown below (van Minde 1997, pp. 43–44):

  • p: b /t’aNpa/ ‘place stop’; /t’aNba/ ‘to add s.t.’
  • p: t /p’aku/ ‘nail’; /t’aku/ ‘afraid’
  • p:d /b’apa/ ‘term of address’; /bad’a/ ‘skin powder’
  • p:c /p’ipi/ ‘cheek’; /p’ici/ ‘to give money’
  • p:j /p’ari/ ‘ray (fish)’; /j’ari/ ‘finger’
  • p:k /p’ele/ ‘to obstruct’; /k’ele/ ‘to press under arm’
  • p:g /p’araŋ/ ‘machete’; /g’araŋ/ ‘salt’
  • b:t /b’aru/ ‘new’; /t’aru/ ‘to place’
  • b:d /b’apa/ ‘term of address’; /d’apa/ ‘to obtain’
  • b:c /b’ole/ ‘may’; /c’ole/ ‘bodice’
  • b:j /b’aNbaŋ/ ‘to warn’; /j’aNbaŋ/ ‘beard’
  • b:k /b’ore/ ‘poisonous extract’; /k’ore/ ‘to fumble’
  • b:g /b’aru/ ‘new’; /g’aru/ ‘to scratch’
  • t:d /t’ulaŋ/ ‘bone’; /d’ulaŋ/ ‘wooden tray’
  • t:c /t’ari/ ‘dance’; /c’ari/ ‘to search’
  • t:j /t’ari/ ‘dance’; /j’ari/ ‘finger’
  • t:k /t’anaŋ/ ‘to plant’; /k’anaŋ/ ‘right (side)’
  • t:g /t’ali/ ‘rope’; /g’ali/ ‘to dig’
  • d:c /d’aro/ ‘from’; /c’ari/ ‘to search’
  • d:j /d’aro/ ‘from’; /j’ari/ ‘finger’
  • d:k /d’aki/ ‘dirt’; /k’aki/ ‘foot’
  • d:g /d’oti/ ‘to work magic’; /g’oti/ ‘trough for preparing sago’
  • c:g /c’ari/ ‘search’; /j’ari/ ‘finger
  • c:k /coK/ ‘choke’; /koK/ ‘owl’
  • c:g /c’ili/ ‘chili’; /g’ilig’ili/ ‘tickle’
  • j:k /j’aNji/ ‘to agree’; /k’aNji/ ‘starch’
  • j:g /j’aga/ ‘to keep watch’; /g’aga/ ‘beautiful’
  • k:g /k’araŋ/ ‘coral’; /g’araŋ/ ‘salt’

In certain lexical items there is an unexplained change between the voiceless stop and its homorganic voiced counterpart (van Minde 1997, p. 44):

/cigulu/ = /jigulu/ ‘riddle’

Nasals

The nasals /m, n, ñ, ŋ/ are separated on the basis of the following (near-) minimal pairs (van Minde 1997, pp. 44–45):

  • m:n /m’ani/ ‘bead’; /n’ani/ ‘bamboo hoe’
  • m:ñ /m’adu/ ‘honey’; /ñ’adu/ ‘brother/sister in-law’
  • m:ŋ /m’ana/ ‘where’; /ŋ’ana/ ‘(inter.) gee!’
  • n:ñ /ne/ in /b’ubur ne/ k.o. porridge; /ñe/ in” /m’uka m’acaŋ ñe/ ‘look disappointed’
  • m:ŋ /’ina/ ‘mother’; /’iŋa/ ‘to remember’
  • ñ:ŋ /t’aña/ ‘to ask’; /t’eŋa/ ‘middle’

The prevalence and functional load of these nasal contrasts differently. They take place word-initially and word-medially before vowels. However, in the environment of word-initially, the functional load of /ñ/ and /ŋ/ is low. Examples are shown (van Minde 1997, p. 45):

/ñ’amu/ [ñ’amu] ‘mosquito’
/ñoŋ/ [ñõŋ] ‘term of address for boys’

In morpheme-final position, nasals other than /ŋ/ are barely proven and thus van Minde (1997, p. 46) finds it hard to find minimal pairs that are different in morpheme-final nasal phoneme.

Fricatives

The labio-dental fricative /f/ takes place only in borrowed words and in words of unknown origin. Examples are shown (van Minde 1997, p. 46):

/f’ader/ [f’ader] ‘term of address for men’

The alveolar fricative /s/ happens in word-initial, -medial, and –final position. Examples are shown (p. 47):

/saw’aI/ [saw’ai] ‘awry’
/rab’us/ [rab’us] ‘to boil’

The glottal fricative /h/ takes place word-medially and word-initially. However, in the use of interjections such as /ih/ ‘Hey!’ and /ah/ ‘Oh no!’- /h/ occur word-finally (van Minde 1997, p. 47) .

Also, word-medial /h/ is optional in certain words; when /h/ is removed between like vowels, one of the two adjacent vowel segments is also deleted. Examples are illustrated below (p. 47):

/bah’asa/ ≈ /basa/ ‘language’
/mas’ohi/ ≈ /mas’oI/ ‘mutual aid’

Liquids

The liquids /l/ and /r/ take place in word-initial, -medial, -final position, just like the alveolar fricative /s/. Example is shown (van Minde 1997, p. 48):

/t’ari/ [t’ari] ‘dance’

Semivowels

The semivowels /w/ and /y/ happen in word-initial and word-medial position before a vowel. Example are shown below (van Minde 1997, p. 48):

/hay’al/ [hay’al] ‘to flirt’
/kal’uyu/ [kal’uyu] ‘shark’

Samples

Examples:

Ambonese word samples:

See also

Notes

  1. Ambonese Malay at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. Allen, Robert B.; Hayami-Allen, Rika (2002). "Orientation in the Spice Islands" (PDF). In Macken, Marlys (ed.). Papers from the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 2000. Tempe: Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies. p. 21. ISBN   1-881044-29-7. OCLC   50506465.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Van Minde 1997, p. 68
  4. Van Minde 1997, p. 184
  5. 1 2 Van Minde 1997, p. 273
  6. Van Minde 1997, p. 275 Note: In this example, seng is represented as sem, as the phoneme /ŋ/ has become bilabial /m/, assimilating to the place of articulation of the bilabial consonant /b/ in the following morpheme bisa.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Van Minde 1997, p. 276
  8. Van Minde 1997, p. 193
  9. Van Minde 1997, p. 133
  10. 1 2 3 4 Van Minde 1997, p. 277
  11. Van Minde 1997, p. 126
  12. 1 2 3 4 Van Minde 1997, p. 278
  13. 1 2 Van Minde 1997, p. 279
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Van Minde 1997, p. 280
  15. 1 2 Van Minde 1997, p. 262

Related Research Articles

Neo-Mandaic, also known as Modern Mandaic, sometimes called the "ratna", is the modern reflex of the Mandaic language, the liturgical language of the Mandaean religious community of Iraq and Iran. Although severely endangered, it survives today as the first language of a small number of Mandaeans in Iran and in the Mandaean diaspora. All Neo-Mandaic speakers are multilingual in the languages of their neighbors, Arabic and Persian, and the influence of these languages upon the grammar of Neo-Mandaic is considerable, particularly in the lexicon and the morphology of the noun. Nevertheless, Neo-Mandaic is more conservative even in these regards than most other Neo-Aramaic languages.

Goemai is an Afro-Asiatic language spoken in the Great Muri Plains region of Plateau State in central Nigeria, between the Jos Plateau and Benue River. Goemai is also the name of the ethnic group of speakers of the Goemai language. The name 'Ankwe' has been used to refer to the people, especially in older literature and to outsiders. As of 2020, it is estimated that there are around 380,000 Goemai speakers.

The Arapaho (Arapahoe) language is one of the Plains Algonquian languages, closely related to Gros Ventre and other Arapahoan languages. It is spoken by the Arapaho of Wyoming and Oklahoma. Speakers of Arapaho primarily live on the Wind River Indian Reservation in Wyoming, though some have affiliation with the Cheyenne living in western Oklahoma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wariʼ language</span> Chapacuran language of Brazil and Bolivia

The Wariʼ language is the sole remaining vibrant language of the Chapacuran language family of the Brazilian–Bolivian border region of the Amazon. It has about 2,700 speakers, also called Wariʼ, who live along tributaries of the Pacaas Novos river in Western Brazil. The word wariʼ means "we!" in the Wariʼ language and is the term given to the language and tribe by its speakers.

The Nafsan language, also known as South Efate or Erakor, is a Southern Oceanic language spoken on the island of Efate in central Vanuatu. As of 2005, there are approximately 6,000 speakers who live in coastal villages from Pango to Eton. The language's grammar has been studied by Nick Thieberger, who has produced a book of stories and a dictionary of the language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shawnee language</span> Central Algonquian language

The Shawnee language is a Central Algonquian language spoken in parts of central and northeastern Oklahoma by the Shawnee people. It was originally spoken by these people in a broad territory throughout the Eastern United States, mostly north of the Ohio River. They occupied territory in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sunwar language</span> Kiranti language of Nepal and India

Sunwar, Sunuwar, or Koinch, is a Kiranti language of the Sino-Tibetan language family spoken in Nepal and India by the Sunuwar people. It was first comprehensively attested by the Himalayan Languages Project. It is also known as Kõits Lo, Kiranti-Kõits, Mukhiya.

Apma is the language of central Pentecost island in Vanuatu. Apma is an Oceanic language. Within Vanuatu it sits between North Vanuatu and Central Vanuatu languages, and combines features of both groups.

The Wuvulu-Aua language is an Austronesian language which is spoken on the Wuvulu and Aua Islands and in the Manus Province of Papua New Guinea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nukak language</span> Endangered indigenous language of Colombia

The Nukak language is a language of uncertain classification, perhaps part of the macrofamily Puinave-Maku. It is very closely related to Kakwa.

Kokota is spoken on Santa Isabel Island, which is located in the Solomon Island chain in the Pacific Ocean. Santa Isabel is one of the larger islands in the chain, but it has a very low population density. Kokota is the main language of three villages: Goveo and Sisigā on the North coast, and Hurepelo on the South coast, though there are a few speakers who reside in the capital, Honiara, and elsewhere. The language is classified as a 6b (threatened) on the Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale (GIDS). To contextualize '6b', the language is not in immediate danger of extinction since children in the villages are still taught Kokota and speak it at home despite English being the language of the school system. However, Kokota is threatened by another language, Cheke Holo, as speakers of this language move from the west of the island closer to the Kokota-speaking villages. Kokota is one of 37 languages in the Northwestern Solomon Group, and as with other Oceanic languages, it has limited morphological complexity.

Papuan Malay or Irian Malay is a Malay-based creole language spoken in the Indonesian part of New Guinea. It emerged as a contact language among tribes in Indonesian New Guinea for trading and daily communication. Nowadays, it has a growing number of native speakers. More recently, the vernacular of Indonesian Papuans has been influenced by Standard Indonesian, the national standard dialect. It is spoken in Indonesian New Guinea alongside 274 other languages and functions as a lingua franca.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duna language</span> Language spoken in Papua New Guinea

Duna is a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. It may belong to the Trans New Guinea language family and is often further classified as a Duna-Pogaya language, for Bogaya appears to be Duna's closest relative, as evidenced by the similar development of the personal pronouns. Estimates for number of speakers range from 11,000 (1991) to 25,000 (2002).

Maia is a Papuan language spoken in the Madang Province of Papua New Guinea, and is a member of the Trans-New Guinea language family. It has a language endangerment status of 6a, which means that it is a vigorous and sustainable language spoken by all generations. According to a 2000 census, there are approximately 4,500 living speakers of the language, who are split between twenty-two villages in the Almani district of the Bogia sub-district.

Teiwa is a Papuan language spoken on the Pantar island in eastern Indonesia. The island is the second largest in the Alor archipelago, lying just west of the largest island Alor.

Neveʻei, also known as Vinmavis, is an Oceanic language of central Malekula, Vanuatu. There are around 500 primary speakers of Neveʻei and about 750 speakers in total.

Belait, or Lemeting, is a Malayo-Polynesian language of Brunei and neighbouring Malaysia. It is spoken by the Belait people who mainly reside in the Bruneian Belait District. There were estimated to be 700 speakers in 1995.

Wamesa is an Austronesian language of Indonesian New Guinea, spoken across the neck of the Doberai Peninsula or Bird's Head. There are currently 5,000–8,000 speakers. While it was historically used as a lingua franca, it is currently considered an under-documented, endangered language. This means that fewer and fewer children have an active command of Wamesa. Instead, Papuan Malay has become increasingly dominant in the area.

Neverver (Nevwervwer), also known as Lingarak, is an Oceanic language. Neverver is spoken in Malampa Province, in central Malekula, Vanuatu. The names of the villages on Malekula Island where Neverver is spoken are Lingarakh and Limap.

Turkmen grammar is the grammar of the Turkmen language, whose dialectal variants are spoken in Turkmenistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, China, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and others. Turkmen grammar, as described in this article, is the grammar of standard Turkmen as spoken and written by Turkmen people in Turkmenistan.

References