2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina

Last updated

2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina
Flag of North Carolina.svg
  2014 November 3, 2020 2026  
Turnout77.4% Increase2.svg
  Sen. Thom Tillis official photo (cropped).jpg James "Cal" Cunningham (cropped 2).jpg
Nominee Thom Tillis Cal Cunningham
Party Republican Democratic
Popular vote2,665,5982,569,965
Percentage48.69%46.94%

2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina results map by county.svg
2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina results by congressional district.svg
NC Senate 2020.svg
Tillis:     40–50%     50–60%     60–70%     70–80%     80–90%     >90%
Cunningham:     40–50%     50–60%     60–70%     70–80%     80–90%     >90%
Tie:     40–50%

U.S. senator before election

Thom Tillis
Republican

Elected U.S. Senator

Thom Tillis
Republican

The 2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of North Carolina, concurrently with the 2020 United States presidential election as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. North Carolina was one of just five states holding presidential, gubernatorial, and senatorial elections concurrently in 2020. On March 3, 2020, Republican incumbent Thom Tillis and Democratic former state senator Cal Cunningham won their respective primaries. [1]

Contents

Cunningham led Tillis in the polls throughout much of the campaign. [2]

In early October 2020, it was reported that Cunningham had exchanged sexually suggestive messages with a married woman who was not his wife. Cunningham confirmed the texts were authentic and apologized for his behavior. [3] [4] The woman stated that she had a consensual physical relationship with Cunningham in 2020. [5] [6]

Incumbent Republican Senator Thom Tillis was re-elected to a second term. Tillis outperformed pre-election polling to win a narrow victory, successfully breaking the "one-term curse" that existed with this particular Senate seat for over twenty years; as no incumbent had been re-elected to this seat since 1996. [7] [8] [9] On November 10, 2020, a week after Election Day, Cunningham called Tillis to concede the race. [10] Tillis won by a margin of 1.8% over Cunningham, slightly larger than his 1.5% victory in 2014. [11] [12] Tillis received a smaller vote share than Donald Trump's 49.93%, but slightly overperformed his margin of victory in North Carolina.

Republican primary

Candidates

Nominee

Eliminated in primary

Withdrawn

Declined

Endorsements

Thom Tillis

U.S. presidents

U.S. executive branch officials

Organizations

Polling

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Sandy
Smith
Thom
Tillis
Garland
Tucker
Mark
Walker
Paul
Wright
OtherUndecided
High Point University [23] February 21–28, 2020247 (LV)69%8%8% [b] 16%
444 (RV)58%7%10% [c] 26%
Meredith College [24] February 16–24, 2020353 (LV)± 3.0%53%5%6% [d] 36%
SurveyUSA [25] February 13–16, 2020501 (LV)± 5.0%59%3%8% [e] 29%
High Point University [26] January 31 – February 6, 2020198 (LV)62%7%5% [f] 27%
400 (RV)52%6%5% [g] 38%
December 20, 2019Smith withdraws from the race; Wright announces his candidacy
December 16, 2019Walker announces he will not run [27]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [28] December 2–4, 2019500 (LV)± 4.38%11% [h] 63%25%
December 2, 2019Tucker withdraws from the race
FOX News [29] November 10–13, 2019574 (LV)± 4.0%4%54%11%5% [i] 26%
Public Policy Polling [30] August 19–20, 2019564 (V) [j] 38%31%31%
Diversified Research (R) [31] [32] [A] July 8–9, 2019500 (V)40%30%30%
WPA Intelligence (R) [33] [B] May 19–21, 2019502 (LV)± 4.5%2% [k] 40%11%17%30%
2% [l] 18%8%56%16%
May 6, 2019Tucker announces his candidacy [34]
Diversified Research (R) [31] [32] [A] Months before May, 2019 [m] 63%7%30%
Hypothetical polling

with only Thom Tillis and Mark Walker

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis
Mark
Walker
Undecided
WPA Intelligence (R) [33] [B] May 19–21, 2019502 (LV)± 4.5%43% [k] 34%23%
28% [n] 64%8%
21% [o] 69%10%

with Thom Tillis and Generic Republican

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis
Generic
Republican
Undecided
WPA Intelligence (R) [33] [B] May 19–21, 2019502 (LV)± 4.5%17% [k] 18%52% [p]
7% [l] 32%57% [p]

Results

Results by county:
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Tillis
60-70%
70-80%
80-90% North Carolina Senate Republican Primary, 2020.svg
Results by county:
  Tillis
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
  •   80–90%
Republican primary results [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Republican Thom Tillis (incumbent) 608,943 78.08%
Republican Paul Wright58,9087.55%
Republican Larry Holmquist57,3567.35%
Republican Sharon Y. Hudson54,6517.01%
Total votes779,858 100.00%

Democratic primary

Candidates

Nominee

Eliminated in primary

Withdrawn

Declined

Endorsements

Cal Cunningham

Federal officials

State officials

Local officials

Organizations

Newspapers

Individuals

Erica D. Smith

Federal officials

State officials

Newspapers

Organizations

Polling

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Cal
Cunningham
Trevor
Fuller
Atul
Goel
Erica
Smith
Steve
Swenson
Undecided
High Point University [66] February 21–28, 2020274 (LV)50%4%1%24%3%18%
474 (RV)42%5%1%24%4%4%
Civitas Institute/Spry Strategies [67] February 26–27, 2020587 (LV)± 4.1%45%2%1%23%1%28%
NBC News/Marist [68] February 23–27, 2020568 (LV)± 5.1%51%3%1%18%2%25%
Public Policy Polling [69] February 23–24, 2020852 (LV)± 3.4%45%4%1%18%2%30%
Meredith College [24] February 16–24, 2020429 (LV)± 3.0%43%2%1%14%2%36%
Civitas Institute/Spry Strategies [70] February 21–23, 2020553 (LV)± 3.8%48%1%0%21%1%29%
SurveyUSA [25] February 13–16, 2020698 (LV)± 4.9%42%3%1%17%3%34%
High Point University [71] January 31 – February 6, 2020224 (LV)37%4%0%11%4%44%
397 (RV)29%5%1%10%5%50%
Public Policy Polling [72] February 4–5, 2020604 (LV)29%3%2%10%4%52%
Public Policy Polling [73] January 10–12, 2020509 (LV)22%2%3%12%1%60%
FOX News [29] November 10–13, 2019669 (RV)± 4.0%13%10%18%49%

Results

Results by county:
Cunningham
40-50%
50-60%
60-70%
70-80%
Smith
40-50%
50-60%
60-70%
70-80% North Carolina Senate Democratic Primary, 2020.svg
Results by county:
  Cunningham
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
  Smith
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
Democratic primary results [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Democratic Cal Cunningham 717,941 56.93%
Democratic Erica D. Smith 438,96934.81%
Democratic Trevor M. Fuller48,1683.82%
Democratic Steve Swenson33,7412.68%
Democratic Atul Goel22,2261.76%
Total votes1,261,045 100.00%

Other candidates

Libertarian Party

Nominee

Constitution Party

Nominee

Independence Party

Withdrawn

Independent write-in candidates

Withdrawn

General election

Campaign

During the Democratic primary, a Republican-funded Super PAC spent $3 million on ads attacking Cunningham and promoting left-wing rival Erica D. Smith. [79] [80]

Cunningham and Tillis participated in debates on September 13, [81] September 22, [82] and October 1. [83]

In July, Tillis claimed Cunningham had been "silent" on the issue of defunding the police, saying,—"I assume [his] silence is ...consent". In reality, Cunningham had spoken publicly about the issue and written an op-ed a month earlier stating his opposition to defunding the police, advocating police reform instead. [84]

On October 3, the New York Times wrote that the race had fallen into "utter mayhem" within a period of a few hours after Tillis tested positive for COVID-19 and Cunningham admitted to exchanging sexual text messages with a woman who was not his wife, damaging an image that leaned heavily on his character and military service. Days later, the woman stated that she had a consensual physical relationship with Cunningham in 2020. [5] The Army Reserve started an investigation into Cunningham. [85] The husband of the woman who stated that she had had an affair with Cunningham, himself an Army veteran, called on Cunningham to drop out of the Senate race. [6] Asked repeatedly whether he had had other extramarital affairs, Cunningham declined to answer. [86] [87] [88] [89]

Tillis's diagnosis, which came after an outbreak at a White House ceremony for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, temporarily threw Barrett's confirmation into jeopardy, as two Republican senators had already stated their intention to vote against (though one of them would eventually vote in favor of her confirmation). [90] [91]

Predictions

SourceRankingAs of
538 [92] Lean D (flip)November 2, 2020
Economist [93] Lean D (flip)November 2, 2020
Daily Kos [94] TossupOctober 30, 2020
DDHQ [95] Lean D (flip)November 3, 2020
Inside Elections [96] Tilt D (flip)October 28, 2020
Sabato's Crystal Ball [97] Lean D (flip)November 2, 2020
RCP [98] TossupOctober 23, 2020
The Cook Political Report [99] TossupOctober 29, 2020
Politico [100] TossupNovember 2, 2020

Endorsements

Thom Tillis (R)

U.S. presidents

U.S. executive branch officials

Organizations

Cal Cunningham (D)

U.S. presidents

U.S. senators, representatives, and federal officials

State officials

Local officials

Organizations

Newspapers

Individuals

Fundraising

In the first quarter of 2020, Cunningham outraised Tillis for the first time, receiving $4.4 million compared to the $2.1 million Tillis raised. Tillis's prior fundraising, however, left him with the advantage in cash on hand, with $6.5 million in the bank, compared to Cunningham's $3 million. [138]

Polling

Graphical summary

Aggregate polls

Cal Cunningham vs. Thom Tillis
Source of poll aggregationDates administeredDates updated Cal Cunningham Thom Tillis Other/Undecided [q] Margin
270 to Win [139] November 2, 2020November 3, 202047.0%44.2%8.8%
Real Clear Politics [140] November 1, 2020November 3, 202047.6%45.0%7.4%

Tillis vs. Cunningham

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis (R)
Cal
Cunningham (D)
Shannon
Bray (L)
Other /
Undecided
Change Research/CNBC [141] October 29 – November 1, 2020473 (LV)± 4.51%46%50%5% [r]
Swayable [142] October 27 – November 1, 2020619 (LV)± 5.6%47%53%
Ipsos/Reuters [143] October 27 – November 1, 2020707 (LV)± 4.2%46%48%6% [s]
Data for Progress [144] October 27 – November 1, 2020908 (LV)± 3.3%46%51%1%1% [t]
Frederick Polls [145] [C] October 30–31, 2020676 (LV)± 3.7%46%50%3%2% [u]
Emerson College [146] October 29–31, 2020855 (LV)± 3.3%47% [v] 50%2% [w]
Morning Consult [147] October 22–31, 20201,982 (LV)± 2%43%47%
CNN/SSRS [148] October 23–30, 2020901 (LV)± 4%44%47%2%5% [x]
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports [149] October 28–29, 2020800 (LV)± 3.5%44%47%9% [y]
East Carolina University [150] October 27–28, 20201,103 (LV)± 3.4%46% [v] 48%5% [z]
Cardinal Point Analytics (R) [151] October 27–28, 2020750 (LV)± 3.6%46%41%6%7% [aa]
Marist College/NBC [152] October 25–28, 2020800 (LV)± 4.7%43%53%4% [ab]
Gravis Marketing [153] October 26–27, 2020614 (LV)± 4%44%46%9% [ac]
Public Policy Polling (D) [154] [D] October 26–27, 2020937 (V)± 3.2%44%47%9% [ac]
Meeting Street Insights/Carolina Partnership for Reform (R) [155] October 24–27, 2020600 (LV)± 4%43%47%
Siena College/NYT Upshot [156] October 23–27, 20201,034 (LV)± 3.4%43%46%2%9% [ad]
Ipsos/Reuters [157] October 21–27, 2020647 (LV)± 4.4%47%48%4% [ae]
RMG Research [158] [af] October 24–26, 2020800 (LV)± 3.5%42% [k] 49%9% [ag]
40% [ah] 51%9% [ag]
43% [ai] 48%9% [ag]
Swayable [159] October 23–26, 2020363 (LV)± 7.1%50%50%
SurveyUSA [160] October 23–26, 2020627 (LV)± 4.9%45%48%7% [aj]
YouGov/UMass Lowell [161] October 20–26, 2020911 (LV)± 4.2%45%49%7% [ak]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [162] October 22–25, 2020504 (LV)± 4.37%43%46%2%8% [al]
YouGov/CBS [163] October 20–23, 20201,022 (LV)± 4.1%43%49%8% [am]
Trafalgar Group [164] October 20–22, 20201,098 (LV)± 2.89%49%47%2%2% [an]
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports [165] October 20–21, 2020800 (LV)± 3.5%45%45%10% [ao]
Citizen Data [166] October 17–20, 20201,000 (LV)± 3.1%42%48%9% [ap]
Ipsos/Reuters [167] October 14–20, 2020660 (LV)± 4.3%47%47%6% [aq]
Morning Consult [147] October 11–20, 20201,904 (LV)± 2.2%42%48%
Meredith College [168] October 16–19, 2020732 (LV)± 3.5%38%43%4%15% [ar]
Change Research/CNBC [169] October 16–19, 2020521 (LV) [as] 45%51%
Data for Progress (D) [170] October 15–18, 2020929 (LV)± 3.2%42%46%1%11% [at]
East Carolina University [171] October 15–18, 20201,155 (LV)± 3.4%47%48%5% [au]
ABC/Washington Post [172] October 12–17, 2020646 (LV)± 4.5%47%49%4% [av]
Emerson College [173] October 13–14, 2020721 (LV)± 3.6%44%45%12% [aw]
Civiqs/Daily Kos [174] October 11–14, 20201,211 (LV)± 3.3%45%51%2%3% [ax]
Siena College/NYT Upshot [175] October 9–13, 2020627 (LV)± 4.5%37%41%4%19% [ay]
Ipsos/Reuters [176] October 7–13, 2020660 (LV)± 4.3%42%46%12% [az]
Monmouth University [177] October 8–11, 2020500 (RV)± 4.4%44%48%3%4% [ba]
500 (LV) [bb] 44%49%6% [bc]
500 (LV) [bd] 47%48%4% [ab]
SurveyUSA [178] October 8–11, 2020669 (LV)± 4.8%39%49%11% [be]
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R) [179] [E] October 7–11, 2020500 (LV)± 4.3%44%46%9% [bf]
RMG Research [180] [bg] October 7–11, 2020800 (LV)36%46%4%15% [bh]
Morning Consult [181] October 2–11, 20201,993 (LV)± 2.2%41%47%
Ipsos/Reuters [182] September 29 – October 6, 2020693 (LV)± 4.2%42%47%11% [bi]
Public Policy Polling [183] October 4–5, 2020911 (V)± 3.3%42%48%11% [bj]
Data For Progress (D) [184] September 30 – October 5, 20201,285 (LV)± 2.7%39%50%2%9% [bk]
Change Research/CNBC [185] October 2–4, 2020396 (LV)46%50%4% [bl]
East Carolina University [186] October 2–4, 20201,232 (LV)± 3.2%47%46%7% [bm]
ALG Research (D) [187] [F] September 22–28, 2020822 (V)41%53%
Hart Research Associates (D) [188] [G] September 24–27, 2020400 (LV)± 4.9%41%54%
YouGov/CBS [189] September 22–25, 20201,213 (LV)± 3.6%38%48%14% [bn]
YouGov/UMass Lowell [190] September 18–25, 2020921 (LV)± 4.1%43%49%8% [bo]
Meredith College [191] September 18–22, 2020705 (RV)± 3.5%42%43%4%13% [bp]
Change Research/CNBC [192] September 18–20, 2020579 (LV)43%48%9% [bq]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [193] September 17–20, 2020612 (LV)± 3.96%38%44%3%15% [br]
Morning Consult [194] September 11–20, 20201,604 (LV)± (2% – 7%)38% [bs] 47%
Emerson College [195] September 16–18, 2020717 (LV)± 3.6%43%49%8% [bt]
Morning Consult [196] September 8–17, 20201,664 (LV) [as] ± (2% – 4%)39%46%
Ipsos/Reuters [197] September 11–16, 2020586 (LV)± 4.6%44%48%9% [bu]
Siena College/NYT Upshot [198] September 11–16, 2020653 (LV)± 4.3%37%42%2%19% [bv]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [199] September 12–15, 20201,092 (LV)± 2.97%38%49%13% [bw]
Suffolk University [200] September 10–14, 2020500 (LV)± 4.4%38%42%6%15% [bx]
SurveyUSA [201] September 10–13, 2020596 (LV)± 5.6%40%47%13% [by]
CNN/SSRS [202] September 9–13, 2020787 (LV)± 4.4%46%47%3%4% [bz]
893 (RV)± 4.1%44%46%4%6% [ca]
Kaiser Family Foundation/Cook Political Report [203] August 29 – September 13, 20201,116 (RV)37%41%22% [cb]
The Trafalgar Group (R) [204] September 9–11, 20201,046 (LV)± 3.0%45%46%3%6% [cc]
Rasmussen Reports/Pulse Opinion Research [205] September 7–8, 20201,000 (LV)± 3.0%44%47%10% [cd]
Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group [206] [H] August 8 – September 8, 20201,600 (LV)± 2.5%39%42%5%13% [ce]
Change Research/CNBC [207] September 4–6, 2020442 (LV)± 4.6%44%51%5% [cf]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [208] August 30 – September 3, 2020951 (LV)± 3.2%37%47%16% [cg]
Monmouth University [209] August 29 – September 1, 2020401 (RV)± 4.9%45%46%2%7% [ch]
401 (LV) [ci] 45%47%8% [cj]
401 (LV) [ck] 46%46%8% [cj]
FOX News [210] August 29 – September 1, 2020722 (LV)± 3.5%42%48%3%8% [cl]
804 (RV)40%47%3%10% [cm]
East Carolina University [211] August 29–30, 20201,101 (LV)± 3.4%44%44%12% [cn]
Change Research/CNBC [212] August 21–23, 2020560 (LV)± 3.6%42%52%6% [co]
Morning Consult [213] August 14–23, 20201,541 (LV)± 2.0%39%47%14%
Redfield and Wilton Strategies [214] August 16–18, 2020856 (LV)± 3.4%38%47%16% [cp]
East Carolina University [215] August 12–13, 20201,255 (RV)± 3.2%40%44%16% [cq]
Emerson College [216] August 8–10, 2020673 (LV)± 3.8%42%44%14% [cr]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [217] August 6–10, 2020600 (LV)± 4.0%38%41%2%18% [cs]
Change Research/CNBC [218] August 7–9, 2020491 (LV)± 4.4%43%48%10% [ct]
Public Policy Polling (D) [219] [I] July 30–31, 2020934 (V)± 3.2%44%48%8% [bt]
Data for Progress [220] July 24 – August 2, 20201,170 (LV)± 3.2%41%49%10% [cu]
YouGov/CBS [221] July 28–31, 20201,121 (LV)± 3.8%39%48%12% [cv]
HIT Strategies (D) [222] [J] July 23–31, 2020400 (RV)± 4.9%32%48%21% [cw]
Change Research/CNBC [223] July 24–26, 2020284 (LV)± 5.6%40%52%8%
Morning Consult [224] July 17–26, 20201,504 (LV)± 3.0%37%46%17%
Cardinal Point Analytics (R) [225] [cx] July 22–24, 2020735 (LV)± 3.6%43%43%1%13% [cy]
Public Policy Polling [226] July 22–23, 2020939 (V)± 3.2%40%48%13% [cz]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [227] July 19–23, 2020919 (LV)± 3.2%36%47%16% [da]
Marist College/NBC News [228] July 14–22, 2020882 (RV)± 4.0%41%50%10% [db]
Spry Strategies (R) [229] [K] July 11–16, 2020750 (LV)± 3.5%40%40%20% [dc]
Cardinal Point Analytics (R) [230] July 13–15, 2020547 (LV)± 4.2%44%47%1%7% [dd]
Change Research/CNBC [231] July 10–12, 2020655 (LV)± 3.8%42%49%9% [de]
Public Policy Polling [232] July 7–8, 2020818 (V)± 3.4%39%47%15% [df]
Change Research/CNBC [233] June 26–28, 2020468 (LV) [as] ± 3.9%41%51%8% [dg]
East Carolina University [234] June 22–25, 20201,149 (RV)± 3.4%41%41%18% [dh]
Public Policy Polling [235] June 22–23, 20201,157 (V)± 2.9%40%44%16% [di]
FOX News [236] June 20–23, 20201,012 (RV)± 3.0%37%39%3%20% [dj]
NYT Upshot/Siena College [237] June 8–18, 2020653 (RV)± 4.1%39%42%19% [dk]
Gravis Marketing (R) [238] [L] June 17, 2020631 (RV)± 3.9%46%45%9%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [239] June 14–17, 2020902 (LV)± 3.3%36%45%19% [dl]
Public Policy Polling [240] June 2–3, 2020913 (V)± 3.2%41%43%16% [di]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] May 26–28, 2020500 (LV)± 4.4%38%36%3%24% [dm]
Meeting Street Insights (R) [242] [dn] May 9–13, 2020500 (RV)± 3.8%44%46%8% [bt]
East Carolina University [243] May 7–9, 20201,111 (RV)± 3.4%40%41%19% [do]
Civiqs/Daily Kos (D) [244] May 2–4, 20201,362 (RV)± 3.0%41%50%9% [dp]
Meredith College [245] April 27–28, 2020604 (RV)± 4.0%34%44%22%
SurveyUSA [246] April 23–26, 2020580 (LV)± 5.5%39%41%20% [dq]
Public Policy Polling [247] April 14–15, 20201,318 (LV)± 3.4%40%47%13%
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [248] April 5–7, 2020500 (LV)± 4.4%38%34%28%
East Carolina University [249] February 27–28, 20201,288 (RV)± 3.2%44%42%14%
NBC News/Marist [68] February 23–27, 20202,120 (RV)± 2.6%43%48%9%
Public Policy Polling [250] [M] February 25–26, 2020 [as] 911 (RV)41%46%13%
Public Opinion Strategies (R) [251] [N] January 11–15, 2020800 (LV)± 3.5%48%44%8%
ALG Research (D) [252] [O] January 8–13, 2020700 (LV)42%44%13%
Meredith College [253] September 29 – October 7, 2019996 (RV)± 3%33%33%32%
Public Policy Polling (D) [254] [O] September 16–17, 2019628 (V)± 3.9%43%45%12%
Fabrizio Ward [255] [H] July 29–31, 2019600 (LV)± 4.0%41%42%17%
Public Policy Polling [256] [P] June 17–18, 2019610 (RV)± 4.0%40%41%19%
Hypothetical polling

with Erica D. Smith

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis (R)
Erica D.
Smith (D)
Undecided
Meredith College [253] September 29 – October 7, 2019996 (RV)± 3%33%34%17%
Emerson College [257] May 31 – June 3, 2019932 (RV)± 3.1%39%46%15%

with Generic Democrat

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis (R)
Generic
Democrat
Undecided
Public Policy Polling (D) [258] [Q] June 30 – July 1, 20171,102 (V)± 3.6%44%48%8%

with Thom Tillis and Generic Opponent

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Thom
Tillis (R)
Generic
Opponent
OtherUndecided
Fabrizio Ward [255] [H] July 29–31, 2019600 (LV)± 4.0%26%52% [dr] 3% [ds] 19%

with Generic Republican and Generic Democrat

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered
Sample
size [a]
Margin
of error
Generic
Republican
Generic
Democrat
Other/Undecided
Ipsos/Reuters [197] September 11–16, 2020586 (LV)± 4.6%47%48%5% [dt]
Siena College/NYT Upshot [198] September 11–16, 2020653 (LV)± 4.3%48%44%8% [du]
Emerson College [216] August 8–10, 2020673 (LV)± 3.8%45%44%11% [bj]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [217] August 6–10, 2020600 (LV)± 4%42%43%16% [dv]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] May 26–28, 2020500 (LV)± 4.38%43%40%17% [dw]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [259] April 5–7, 2020500 (LV)± 4.4%41%42%17% [dw]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released March 17, 2020 [m] 44%41%15% [dx]
Climate Nexus [260] Feb 11–15, 2020675 (RV)± 3.9%43%46%11%
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released October 17, 2019 [m] 40%41%20% [dy]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released September 11, 2019 [m] 37%42%21% [dz]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released August 4, 2019 [m] 39%37%24% [ea]
Fabrizio Ward [255] [H] July 29–31, 2019600 (LV)± 4.0%44%44%11% [eb]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released June 10, 2019 [m] 38%38%24% [ec]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released May 5, 2019 [m] 39%39%22% [ed]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released March 17, 2019 [m] 37%40%22% [ee]
Harper Polling/Civitas (R) [241] Released February 13, 2019 [m] 37%38%25% [ef]

Results

Like many Republican Senate candidates in 2020, Tillis did much better on Election Day than pre-election prediction polling indicated. The senator narrowly defeated Cunningham 48.7 to 46.9 and slightly outperformed President Trump in terms of margin of victory. Tillis's upset victory has been largely attributed to Cunningham's response to his alleged affair as well as Tillis's fierce campaigning during the last few weeks of the campaign. [261]

2020 United States Senate election in North Carolina [262]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Republican Thom Tillis (incumbent) 2,665,598 48.69% −0.13%
Democratic Cal Cunningham 2,569,96546.94%−0.32%
Libertarian Shannon Bray171,5713.13%−0.61%
Constitution Kevin E. Hayes67,8181.24%N/A
Total votes5,474,952 100.00%
Republican hold

By county

By county
County [263] Thom Tillis
Republican
Cal Cunningham
Democratic
Shannon Bray
Libertarian
Kevin Hayes
Constitution
MarginTotal
votes
#%#%#%#%#%
Alamance 44,24651.7438,03844.492,3022.699221.086,2087.2685,508
Alexander 14,73973.534,28721.395632.814552.2710,45252.1520,044
Alleghany 4,08267.951,58726.421923.201462.432,49541.536,007
Anson 4,98144.845,75651.822041.841671.50-775-6.9811,108
Ashe 10,61967.914,27927.374572.922811.806,34040.5515,636
Avery 6,86573.652,07922.302462.641311.414,78651.359,321
Beaufort 15,44859.319,43936.247062.714531.746,00923.0726,046
Bertie 3,59737.115,82560.091581.631141.18-2,228-22.989,694
Bladen 8,96753.127,28043.133992.362351.391,6879.9916,881
Brunswick 52,97159.3832,18036.082,8813.231,1701.3120,79123.3189,202
Buncombe 60,68837.9292,66457.905,0543.161,6361.02-31,976-19.98160,042
Burke 28,93465.5113,10829.681,3092.968191.8515,82635.8344,170
Cabarrus 61,23152.7448,88642.114,2613.671,7241.4812,34510.63116,102
Caldwell 29,97170.7610,28824.291,2993.077991.8919,68346.4742,357
Camden 4,18171.621,40324.031833.13711.222,77847.595,838
Carteret 28,49267.4711,82328.001,3123.116011.4216,66939.4742,228
Caswell 6,64355.544,91641.102782.321241.041,72714.4411,961
Catawba 54,00465.1624,84529.982,5503.081,4841.7929,15935.1882,883
Chatham 21,03943.5225,69753.161,1712.424310.89-4,658-9.6448,338
Cherokee 12,04873.983,58922.044082.502411.488,45951.9416,286
Chowan 4,35356.613,12440.631391.81730.951,22915.987,689
Clay 4,89771.901,67624.611402.05981.443,22147.296,811
Cleveland 32,02263.0616,75232.991,2352.437681.5115,27030.0750,777
Columbus 15,56359.629,59936.775161.984241.625,96422.8526,102
Craven 29,54256.2520,41638.871,7723.377911.519,12617.3852,521
Cumberland 57,12139.2081,00155.595,3793.692,2181.52-23,880-16.39145,719
Currituck 11,36871.293,84924.145543.471751.107,51947.1515,946
Dare 13,58156.989,28438.957663.212040.864,29718.0323,835
Davidson 60,68668.8123,66026.832,4962.831,3461.5337,02641.9988,188
Davie 17,41569.216,57026.117813.103961.5710,84543.1025,162
Duplin 12,95457.758,68938.734772.133121.394,26519.0122,432
Durham 34,15219.20138,42977.405,0412.821,2240.68-104,277-58.30178,846
Edgecombe 8,58233.9015,95263.015062.002781.10-7,370-29.1125,318
Forsyth 83,22841.72107,27753.776,5333.272,4711.24-24,049-12.05199,509
Franklin 19,65452.9415,65942.181,2463.365651.523,99510.7637,124
Gaston 69,39860.7739,59534.673,5483.111,6601.4529,80326.07114,201
Gates 3,20554.462,47442.041322.24741.2673112.425,885
Graham 3,35573.751,01322.27942.07871.912,34251.484,549
Granville 15,68750.0214,36845.829082.903961.261,3194.2131,359
Greene 4,59152.783,84244.171892.17770.897498.618,699
Guilford 104,90837.18165,82358.778,5873.042,8191.00-60,915-21.59282,137
Halifax 9,44636.9315,43860.364561.782370.93-5,992-23.4325,577
Harnett 33,32157.5721,52337.182,1283.689111.5711,79820.3857,883
Haywood 21,50259.2613,11336.141,0812.985871.628,38923.1236,283
Henderson 39,35957.9925,78237.991,9642.897681.1313,57720.0067,873
Hertford 3,30531.806,81565.581541.481181.14-3,510-33.7810,392
Hoke 8,63840.4011,46653.629094.253701.73-2,828-13.2221,383
Hyde 1,31553.261,07543.54532.15261.052409.722,469
Iredell 64,31963.4431,89331.463,4873.441,6871.6632,42631.98101,386
Jackson 10,76350.689,38244.177883.713061.441,3816.5021,239
Johnston 64,82258.8239,77136.093,9533.591,6671.5125,05122.73110,213
Jones 3,04655.852,12438.941823.341021.8792216.915,454
Lee 15,41953.7011,85141.279793.414651.623,56812.4328,714
Lenoir 13,89849.4313,28447.245912.103461.236142.1828,119
Lincoln 34,67369.6612,85825.831,4822.987631.5321,81543.8349,776
Macon 13,40865.356,24830.455212.543401.667,16034.9020,517
Madison 7,39957.174,98738.533622.801951.512,41218.6412,943
Martin 6,03448.575,97348.082572.071601.29610.4912,424
McDowell 15,89469.875,93426.095652.483541.569,96043.7922,747
Mecklenburg 186,69333.18350,77562.3419,7643.515,4400.97-164,082-29.16562,672
Mitchell 6,73575.321,91921.461812.021071.204,81653.868,942
Montgomery 7,74160.954,37934.483242.552562.023,36226.4712,700
Moore 35,68261.7119,63333.951,7603.047481.2916,04927.7657,823
Nash 24,71947.6325,47449.091,1172.155851.13-755-1.4651,895
New Hanover 61,41547.1361,70247.355,5164.231,6851.29-287-0.22130,318
Northampton 3,72037.166,00559.981871.87990.99-2,285-22.8210,011
Onslow 42,86860.2123,34432.793,6275.091,3631.9119,52427.4271,202
Orange 20,86224.6861,21472.421,9612.324880.58-40,352-47.7484,525
Pamlico 4,58960.532,68135.361882.481231.621,90825.177,581
Pasquotank 9,49148.319,42147.955382.741981.01700.3619,648
Pender 20,66061.2011,27233.391,2743.775531.649,38827.8133,759
Perquimans 4,81764.872,38232.081391.87881.192,43532.797,426
Person 12,19256.498,47539.276002.783151.463,71717.2221,582
Pitt 37,94743.6745,59852.472,5102.898460.97-7,651-8.8086,901
Polk 7,39460.354,43636.212862.331361.112,95824.1412,252
Randolph 53,35773.5215,97322.012,0972.891,1431.5837,38451.5172,570
Richmond 11,00253.858,51041.655662.773521.722,49212.2020,430
Robeson 25,21154.8719,13541.649552.086481.416,07613.2245,949
Rockingham 28,97161.2316,18934.221,4733.116801.4412,78227.0247,313
Rowan 46,44663.8422,61531.092,2543.101,4331.9723,83132.7672,748
Rutherford 23,59669.269,13626.827812.295541.6314,46042.4534,067
Sampson 16,52158.2510,81838.156362.243851.365,70320.1128,360
Scotland 7,06648.866,85047.373222.232231.542161.4914,461
Stanly 23,89171.178,04523.969612.866742.0115,84647.2033,571
Stokes 18,59972.995,61122.028123.194581.8012,98850.9725,480
Surry 25,47570.179,26725.531,0302.845311.4616,20844.6536,303
Swain 3,84655.172,69638.672984.271311.881,15016.506,971
Transylvania 11,20955.488,15840.385522.732861.423,05115.1020,205
Tyrrell 94552.9777843.61372.07241.351679.361,784
Union 79,64561.3445,09634.733,7652.901,3381.0334,54926.61129,844
Vance 7,87637.8412,24758.844552.192371.14-4,371-21.0020,815
Wake 232,38837.05367,71858.6322,2303.544,8930.78-135,330-21.58627,229
Warren 3,52034.306,43762.721941.891121.09-2,917-28.4210,263
Washington 2,58442.053,32954.171282.081041.69-745-12.126,145
Watauga 14,21644.5916,19350.801,1383.573311.04-1,977-6.2031,878
Wayne 29,17453.1023,52842.821,4192.588231.505,64610.2854,944
Wilkes 25,48872.678,07423.029242.645871.6717,41449.6535,073
Wilson 18,64246.1320,44550.598852.194391.09-1,803-4.4640,411
Yadkin 14,79874.864,03620.425532.803811.9310,76254.4419,768
Yancey 7,03862.393,83333.982502.221591.413,20528.4111,280
Totals2,665,59848.692,569,96546.94171,5713.1367,8181.2495,6331.755,474,952

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

By congressional district

Tillis won 8 of 13 congressional districts. [264]

DistrictTillisCunninghamRepresentative
1st 43%53% G. K. Butterfield
2nd 35%60% George Holding
Deborah K. Ross
3rd 59%37% Greg Murphy
4th 32%64% David Price
5th 64%31% Virginia Foxx
6th 37%59% Mark Walker
Kathy Manning
7th 56%39% David Rouzer
8th 50%44% Richard Hudson
9th 53%43% Dan Bishop
10th 64%31% Patrick McHenry
11th 53%42% Madison Cawthorn
12th 29%66% Alma Adams
13th 64%32% Ted Budd

See also

Notes

Partisan clients

  1. 1 2 Poll sponsored by the Garland Tucker campaign
  2. 1 2 3 Poll conducted by the Club for Growth, a pro-Republican PAC
  3. Compete Everywhere primarily supports Democratic candidates
  4. Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organization.
  5. Poll sponsored by The American Greatness PAC, which is pro-Trump.
  6. Poll sponsored by Piedmont Rising, a pro-Affordable Care Act organization.
  7. Poll sponsored by The Human Rights Campaign, which has endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Poll sponsored by AARP.
  9. This poll's sponsor had endorsed Cunningham prior to the sampling period
  10. This poll’s sponsor, DFER, primarily supports Democratic candidates
  11. This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501 that supports the Republican Party.
  12. Polling was sponsored by OANN.
  13. Poll sponsored by private client
  14. Internal poll
  15. 1 2 Poll sponsored by End Citizens United, an organization that has exclusively endorsed Democratic candidates
  16. Poll sponsored by VoteVets.org
  17. Poll sponsored by Save My Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organisation

Voter samples and additional candidates

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. Hudson with 8%; Holmquist with 5%
  3. Holmquist and Hudson with 5%
  4. Holmquist and Hudson with 3%
  5. Holmquist and Hudson with 4%
  6. Holmquist with 3%; Hudson with 2%
  7. Hudson with 3%; Holmquist with 2%
  8. If the only candidates were Smith and Tillis
  9. "None of the above" with 5%; "other" with 0%
  10. If the only candidates were Tillis and Tucker
  11. 1 2 3 4 Standard VI response
  12. 1 2 Response after pollster addresses respondents with talking points about Tillis
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Not yet released
  14. Response after pollster addresses respondents with short biographies for Tillis and Walker
  15. Response after short biographies and talking points about Tillis
  16. 1 2 Listed as "would consider another candidate in a Republican primary"
  17. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  18. "Refused" with 2%; Did not vote, would not vote and Undecided with 1%
  19. "Some other candidate" with 4%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 2%
  20. Hayes (C) with 1%; "Other candidate or write-in" with 0%
  21. Hayes (C) with 2%
  22. 1 2 With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  23. "Someone else" with 2%
  24. Hayes (C) and Undecided with 2%; "None of these" with 1%; "Other" with 0%
  25. "Some other candidate" with 3%; Undecided with 6%
  26. "Some other candidate" with 3%; "Refused" with 2%; Did/would not vote with 0%; Undecided with no voters
  27. Hayes (C) with 2%; Undecided with 6%
  28. 1 2 "Other" and Undecided with 2%
  29. 1 2 Undecided with 9%
  30. Would not vote with 2%; Hayes (C) with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 6%
  31. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 1%
  32. Archived November 1, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  33. 1 2 3 "Someoene else" with 4%; Undecided with 5%
  34. Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
  35. Results generated with high Republican turnout model
  36. "Other" with 3%; Undecided with 4%
  37. Did not vote with 1%; "Another candidate" with no voters; Undecided with 6%
  38. Hays (C) with 1%; Undecided with 7%
  39. "Someone else" with 3%; Undecided with 5%
  40. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 2%
  41. "Some other candidate" with 4%; Undecided with 6%
  42. "Other" with 3%; Undecided with 6%
  43. "Some other candidate" and "Undecided/Refused" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  44. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 14%
  45. 1 2 3 4 Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight
  46. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 10%
  47. Did/would not vote and "Some other candidate" with 1%; "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 3%
  48. "Neither" with 1%; "Other" and would not vote with 0%; Undecided with 3%
  49. Undecided with 12%
  50. Hayes (C) with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; Undecided with 2%
  51. Hayes (C) with 3%; would not vote with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 15%
  52. "Some other candidate" with 5%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 7%
  53. "No one" with 1%; Hayes (C) with 0%; "Other candidate" with no voters; Undecided with 3%
  54. With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout
  55. "Other" and Undecided with 3%
  56. With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout
  57. "Some other candidate" with 3%; Undecided with 8%
  58. "Other" and "Refused" with 1%; Undecided with 7%
  59. Archived October 14, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  60. "Some other candidate" with 3%; Undecided with 12%
  61. "Some other candidate" with 4%; would not vote with 0%; "Undecided/Refused" with 7%
  62. 1 2 Undecided with 11%
  63. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 8%
  64. Would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 3%
  65. "Some other candidate" with 3%; "Refused" and would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 2%
  66. "Someone else" with 3%; Undecided with 11%
  67. "Another candidate" with 1%; Undecided with 7%
  68. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 12%
  69. Would not vote with 2%; "Don't recall" with 0%; Undecided with 7%
  70. Bray (L) with 2%; Undecided with 13%
  71. Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size
  72. 1 2 3 Undecided with 8%
  73. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 6%
  74. Hayes (C), "Someone else" and would not vote with 1%; "Undecided/Refused" with 16%
  75. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 4%; Undecided with 9%
  76. Bray (L) with 6%; Hayes (C) and "Other" with 2%; "Refused" with 0%; Undecided with 11%
  77. "Another candidate" with 3%; Undecided with 10%
  78. Hayes (C) with 1%; "None of these" and "Other" with no voters; Undecided with 3%
  79. Hayes (C) with 1%; "None of these" and "Other" with 0%; Undecided with 5%
  80. "Neither/Another Party" with 3%; "Undecided/Don't know/Refused" with 19%
  81. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 5%
  82. "Another candidate" with 3%; Undecided with 7%
  83. Hayes with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; Undecided with 12%
  84. Would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 4%
  85. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 3%; Undecided with 13%
  86. Hayes (C) and "No one" with 1%; "Other candidate" with <1%; Undecided with 5%
  87. With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  88. 1 2 "Other" and Undecided with 4%
  89. With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  90. Hayes (C), "Other" and would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 5%
  91. Hayes (C) with 2%; "Other" and would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 6%
  92. "Some other candidate" with 3%; Would not vote with 0%; Undecided with 9%
  93. Would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 5%
  94. "Third party/write-in" with 3%; Undecided with 13%
  95. "Some other candidate" with 5%; would not vote with 1%; Undecided with 10%
  96. Undecided with 14%
  97. Hayes (C) with 2%; Undecided with 16%
  98. Would not vote with 2%; Undecided with 8%
  99. "No one" with 10%
  100. "Someone else" with 3%; Undecided with 9%
  101. "Third party candidate" with 4%; would not vote with 2%; Undecided with 15%
  102. Archived July 30, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  103. Hayes (C) with 2%; Undecided with 11%
  104. Undecided with 13%
  105. "Third party/write-in" with 2%; Undecided with 14%
  106. "Other" with 1%; Undecided with 9%
  107. "Another candidate" with 6%; Undecided with 13%
  108. Hayes (C) with 1%; Undecided with 6%
  109. Undecided with 7%; would not vote with 2%
  110. Undecided with 15%
  111. Undecided with 7%; would not vote with 1%
  112. Undecided with 10%; "Some other candidate" with 8%
  113. 1 2 Undecided with 16%
  114. Undecided with 15%; Hayes (C) with 3%; "other" and would not vote with 1%
  115. Undecided with 17%; "Another candidate" and would not vote with 1%
  116. Undecided with 16%; "Another third party/write in" with 3%
  117. Hayes (C) with 2%; Undecided with 21%
  118. Archived June 5, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  119. Undecided with 11%; "other candidate" with 8%
  120. Undecided with 5%; "Someone else" with 4%
  121. Undecided with 20%
  122. "It is time to give a new person a chance to do better" with 50% as opposed to "Thillis has performed his job as U.S. Senator well enough to deserve re-election"
  123. "Refused" with 3%
  124. "Prefer not to answer/Refused" with 4%; "Candidate from another political party" with 1%; "Will not vote/not sure" with 0%
  125. "Undecided/Refused" with 8%
  126. "Neither" and "Other Party" with 1%; Undecided with 14%
  127. 1 2 Undecided with 14%; "Neither/other/independent" with 3%
  128. Undecided with 11%; "Neither/other/independent" with 4%
  129. Undecided with 17%; "Neither/other/independent" with 3%
  130. Undecided with 16%; "Neither/other/independent" with 5%
  131. Undecided with 19%; "Neither/other/independent" with 5%
  132. "Undecided" with 8%; "don't know/refused" with 3%
  133. Undecided with 18%; "Neither/other/independent" with 6%
  134. Undecided with 17%; "Neither/other/independent" with 5%
  135. Undecided with 15%; "Neither/other/independent" with 7%
  136. Undecided with 21%; "Neither/other/independent" with 4%

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cal Cunningham</span> American politician from North Carolina

James Calvin Cunningham III is an American lawyer, politician, and retired military officer. A member of the Democratic Party and a lieutenant colonel in the United States Army Reserve, he served one term as a North Carolina state senator from 2001 to 2003. Having previously run for United States Senate in a 2010 primary, Cunningham was the Democratic nominee for the 2020 U.S. Senate election in North Carolina, narrowly losing to incumbent Republican Thom Tillis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thom Tillis</span> American politician (born 1960)

Thomas Roland Tillis is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from North Carolina, a seat he has held since 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Tillis served in the North Carolina House of Representatives from 2007 to 2015, and as its speaker from 2011 to 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 United States Senate election in North Carolina</span>

The 2014 United States Senate election in North Carolina took place on November 4, 2014, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the state of North Carolina, concurrently with other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. The primary took place on May 6, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Michigan</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Michigan was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent Michigan. It was held concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Colorado</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Colorado was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Colorado, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020–21 United States Senate election in Georgia</span>

The 2020–21 United States Senate election in Georgia was held on November 3, 2020, and on January 5, 2021, to elect the Class II member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Georgia. Democrat Jon Ossoff defeated incumbent Republican Senator David Perdue in the runoff election. The general election was held concurrently with the 2020 presidential election, as well as with other elections to the Senate, elections to the U.S. House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Virginia</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Virginia was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the Commonwealth of Virginia, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives, and various state and local elections. Incumbent Democratic senator Mark Warner won reelection to a third term against Republican nominee Daniel Gade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Iowa</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Iowa was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Iowa, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Primaries were held on June 2.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Montana</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Montana was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Montana. It was held concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states, elections to the United States House of Representatives, and various state and local elections. The primaries for both the Democratic and Republican nominations took place on June 2, 2020. Incumbent senator Steve Daines won the Republican primary, while Montana Gov. Steve Bullock won the Democratic primary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Maine</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Maine was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Maine, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives, and various state and local elections. This was Maine's first election for its Class 2 seat to use its ranked choice voting system. Because the first round of the general election saw a majority, the instant runoff tabulation of more than 800,000 ballots was not carried out.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Kentucky</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in Kentucky was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the Commonwealth of Kentucky, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Incumbent Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, who had been Senate Majority Leader since 2015 and senator from Kentucky since 1985, won reelection to a seventh term in office. He faced off against former U.S. Marine fighter pilot Amy McGrath and Libertarian Brad Barron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in South Carolina</span>

The 2020 United States Senate election in South Carolina was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of South Carolina, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 North Carolina gubernatorial election</span>

The 2020 North Carolina gubernatorial election was held on November 3, 2020, to elect the governor of North Carolina, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as elections to one-third of the United States Senate and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Democratic incumbent Roy Cooper was re-elected to a second term, defeating Republican lieutenant governor Dan Forest. Cooper became the first North Carolina governor to win re-election since Mike Easley in 2004. He also outperformed other Democrats on the ballot and was the only Democrat to win a gubernatorial race in a state carried by Donald Trump in 2020. With a margin of 4.51%, this election was the second closest of the 2020 gubernatorial election cycle after Puerto Rico and the closest in a U.S. state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erica D. Smith</span> American politician in North Carolina

Erica Danette Smith is an American engineer and politician who represented District 3 in the North Carolina Senate from 2015 to 2021. She was a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate in 2020. She finished second in the Democratic primaries on March 3, 2020. She was a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate in 2022, but she switched to the race for North Carolina's 1st congressional district after Rep. G. K. Butterfield announced that he would not run for another term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 North Carolina lieutenant gubernatorial election</span>

The 2020 North Carolina lieutenant gubernatorial election took place on November 3, 2020, to elect the Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as elections to the United States Senate and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Primary elections were held on March 3, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate special election in Arizona</span>

The 2020 United States Senate special election in Arizona was held on November 3, 2020, following the death in office of incumbent Republican U.S. Senator John McCain on August 25, 2018. Governor Doug Ducey was required by Arizona law to appoint a Republican to fill the vacant seat until a special election winner could be sworn in. On September 5, 2018, Ducey appointed former U.S. Senator Jon Kyl to fill McCain's seat. However, Kyl announced he would resign on December 31, 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina</span>

The 2022 United States Senate election in North Carolina was held on November 8, 2022, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of North Carolina. Primary elections were scheduled for March 8, 2022, but were delayed by the North Carolina Supreme Court and rescheduled for May 17.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 United States Senate election in Connecticut</span>

The 2022 United States Senate election in Connecticut was held on November 8, 2022, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Connecticut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 North Carolina gubernatorial election</span>

The 2024 North Carolina gubernatorial election was held on November 5, 2024, to elect the governor of North Carolina. Democratic state attorney general Josh Stein won his first term in office, defeating Republican lieutenant governor Mark Robinson. He will succeed Democratic incumbent Roy Cooper, who was term-limited.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2026 United States Senate election in North Carolina</span>

The 2026 United States Senate election in North Carolina will be held on November 3, 2026, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the state of North Carolina. Incumbent two-term Republican Senator Thom Tillis, was re-elected in 2020 with 48.7% of the vote against former State Senator Cal Cunningham. On June 10, 2023, the North Carolina Republican Party had censured Tillis over his bipartisan support on gun control and same-sex marriage. Outgoing governor Roy Cooper, who is term-limited as governor in 2024, is considered a potential Democratic candidate. On July 30, 2024, NBC reported that Cooper is planning to run for the Senate seat.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "NC SBE Contest Results". er.ncsbe.gov. North Carolina Board of Elections. Retrieved March 7, 2020.
  2. "Thom Tillis claims victory, Cal Cunningham waiting on all votes to be counted". wcnc.com. November 3, 2020.
  3. Robertson, Gary D. (October 3, 2020). "N. Carolina Senate race upended by sexting, virus diagnosis". Associated Press .
  4. Buck, Rebecca (October 3, 2020). "Democratic Senate candidate in North Carolina confirms romantic texts with woman who isn't his wife". CNN. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
  5. 1 2 Arkin, James (October 6, 2020). "Cal Cunningham under fire after more texts revealed". Politico . Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  6. 1 2 Copp, Tara; Murphy, Brian; Alexander, Ames (October 7, 2020). "After woman confirms affair, her husband calls on Cunningham to drop out of NC Senate race". News & Observer. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  7. "Forecasting the US elections". economist.com. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  8. "Latest Polls". fivethirtyeight.com. June 28, 2018. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  9. "Despite A Sexting Scandal, Democrat Cal Cunningham Is Favored In North Carolina's Senate Race". fivethirtyeight.com. October 15, 2020. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  10. "Cunningham concedes to US Sen. Tillis in North Carolina". Associated Press . Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  11. Snell, Kelsey; Walsh, Deirdre (November 10, 2020). "GOP Sen. Thom Tillis Wins Reelection In North Carolina After Democrat Concedes". NPR.org. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  12. Fordham, Evie (November 10, 2020). "Cal Cunningham concedes to Thom Tillis in North Carolina Senate race". Fox News . Retrieved November 10, 2020.
  13. Cohen, Zach C. (December 5, 2018). "How 2014's Outsiders Became 2020's Insiders". National Journal. Archived from the original on July 9, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2018.
  14. 1 2 3 Robertson, Gary D. (December 20, 2019). "N Carolina candidates rush for legislature, Meadows' seat". Raleigh News & Observer. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
  15. Woolverton, Paul (April 17, 2019). "Near-death experience inspires Eric Mansfield to consider US Senate race". The Fayetteville Observer. Retrieved April 26, 2019.
  16. Pathé, Simone (December 2, 2019). "Garland Tucker drops Senate primary challenge to North Carolina's Thom Tillis". Roll Call. Retrieved December 2, 2019.
  17. Wong, Scott; Bolton, Alexander (March 13, 2019). "GOP's Tillis comes under pressure for taking on Trump". The Hill. Retrieved March 13, 2019.
  18. Frey, Kevin [@KevinFreyTV] (April 30, 2019). "In interview with @costareports, Rep. Mark Meadows says there's "zero chance" he will primary @SenThomTillis, but says he believes Tillis will have a "legitimate" primary opponent #ncpol" (Tweet). Retrieved April 30, 2019 via Twitter.
  19. Wong, Scott; Wilson, Reid (December 4, 2019). "NC rep explores Tillis primary challenge". The Hill. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  20. 1 2 "George W. Bush to hold virtual fundraiser for Republican senators". The Washington Post .
  21. 1 2 Fredericks, Bob (September 13, 2019). "John Bolton returns to former position as head of two PACs".
  22. 1 2 "Thom Tillis". Susan B. Anthony List. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved February 27, 2020.
  23. High Point University Archived March 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  24. 1 2 Meredith College
  25. 1 2 SurveyUSA
  26. High Point University Archived February 12, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  27. Murphy, Brian (December 16, 2019). "His House district was made a Democratic one. Here's what's next for Mark Walker". The News & Observer. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  28. Harper Polling/Civitas (R)
  29. 1 2 FOX News
  30. Public Policy Polling
  31. 1 2 Diversified Research (R)
  32. 1 2 "Tweet". Twitter.com. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
  33. 1 2 3 WPA Intelligence (R)
  34. Pathé, Simone (May 6, 2019). "Trump loyalty is already at the heart of North Carolina Senate primary". Roll Call. Retrieved August 30, 2020.
  35. Robertson, Gary D. (June 17, 2019). "Democrat Cal Cunningham enters North Carolina Senate race". Associated Press News. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
  36. "Thom Tillis getting his first serious 2020 challenger". charlotteobserver. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  37. 1 2 Daniel, Nyamekye (December 9, 2019). "U.S. Sen. Tillis files for re-election amid handful of challengers". The Center Square. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
  38. "Teacher becomes 3rd Democrat to seek Thom Tillis' U.S. Senate seat in 2020". newsobserver. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  39. 1 2 "North Carolina Senate 2020 Race". Open Secrets. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  40. "Lee, Eva F MS – Candidate overview". FEC.gov. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  41. Colin Campbell [@RaleighReporter] (February 8, 2019). "The first Democrat to announce a run for Tillis' U.S. Senate seat is switching races to run for labor commissioner #ncpol" (Tweet) via Twitter.
  42. Campbell, Colin [@RaleighReporter] (July 5, 2019). "Just in: Former state Sen. Eric Mansfield announces he won't run for U.S. Senate after all. This leaves Cal Cunningham, Erica Smith and Trevor Fuller in the Democratic primary race #ncpol" (Tweet). Retrieved July 5, 2019 via Twitter.
  43. 1 2 3 4 5 Mills, Thomas (April 29, 2019). "Challengers for Tillis". PoliticsNC. Retrieved April 29, 2019.
  44. "A rising statewide star". NC SPIN Balanced Debate for the Old North State. January 24, 2019. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  45. Morrill, Jim (January 30, 2019). "Tillis, rivals gear up for a costly Senate race. Could Democrats pick up a seat?". The Charlotte Observer. Retrieved January 31, 2019.
  46. Arkin, James (March 13, 2019). "Senate recruiting notebook: Multiple Democrats eyeing Texas". Politico Pro. Retrieved March 13, 2019. Tom Ross, the president of the Volcker Alliance and former president of the University of North Carolina system, is a potential candidate, according to North Carolina Democrats. Ross, who was mentioned as a possible Senate candidate in 2016 but declined to run, confirmed to POLITICO that people have talked to him about the race and he's "considering what they have to say."
  47. Schneider, Elena (March 6, 2019). "Democratic state AG won't challenge Tillis for North Carolina Senate seat". Politico. Retrieved March 6, 2019.
  48. 1 2 "NC-Sen: Sen. Sherrod Brown (D. OH) Helps Cal Cunningham (D) Get Ready To Defeat Thom Tillis (R)". Daily KOS. December 30, 2019.
  49. 1 2 "NC-Sen: Sen. Bob Casey, Jr. (D. PA) Helps Cal Cunningham (D) Defeat Thom "Cover-Up" Tillis (R)". Daily KOS. February 10, 2020.
  50. 1 2 3 4 Morrill, Jim (June 17, 2019). "Democrat Cal Cunningham enters US Senate race, and draws fire from both sides". The Charlotte Observer . Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  51. 1 2 "NC-Sen: Sen. Tim Kaine (D. VA) Helps Cal Cunningham (D) Get Ready To Defeat Thom Tillis (R)". Daily KOS. December 30, 2019.
  52. Schneider, Elena (May 1, 2020). "Klobuchar launches Campaign to aid Senate, House Dems in 2020". Politico. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  53. 1 2 "Harvey Gantt Endorses Cal Cunningham". calfornc. March 1, 2020. Archived from the original on March 1, 2020. Retrieved March 1, 2020.
  54. 1 2 Brown, Kris (December 19, 2019). "Brady Endorses Cal Cunningham for U.S. Senate: A Common-Sense Champion for Gun Violence Prevention". Brady Campaign. Retrieved December 28, 2019.
  55. 1 2 "Cal Cunningham for Senate (D-NC)- Council for a Livable World". Council for a Livable World.
  56. 1 2 Murphy, Brian (October 31, 2019). "National Democrats make their pick in North Carolina's Senate primary". The News & Observer . Retrieved October 31, 2019.
  57. 1 2 "JStreetPAC Candidates". JStreetPAC. Archived from the original on May 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2019.
  58. 1 2 Richtman, Max (October 29, 2019). "National Committee Endorses Cal Cunningham in NC Senate Race".
  59. 1 2 "Endorsements". replacementsltdpac. Replacements Ltd. PAC.
  60. Editorial Board, Observer (February 14, 2020). "Our endorsement for the U.S. Senate Democratic primary in North Carolina". The Charlotte Observer.
  61. Editorial Board, Charlotte Post (February 27, 2020). "The Post endorses Mike Bloomberg for president". Charlotte Post.
  62. 1 2 3 Editorial Board, Indy Week (February 12, 2020). "The INDY's Endorsements for President, U.S. Senate, and Congress". Indy Week.
  63. 1 2 "Page by Page Report Display (Page 945 of 1405)".
  64. 1 2 3 "Endorsements". Erica Smith for Senate. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
  65. "Equality North Carolina Endorsed Candidates 2020". Equality NC. February 17, 2020.
  66. High Point University Archived March 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  67. Civitas Institute/Spry Strategies
  68. 1 2 NBC News/Marist
  69. Public Policy Polling
  70. Civitas Institute/Spry Strategies
  71. High Point University Archived February 12, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  72. Public Policy Polling
  73. Public Policy Polling
  74. "FEC Form 2 Statement of Candidacy – Shannon Bray" (PDF). FEC. July 16, 2019. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  75. "NC State Board of Elections: Candidate List Grouped by Contest" (PDF). Retrieved August 18, 2024.
  76. "The Green Papers: North Carolina 2020 General Election". The Green Papers. April 22, 2020. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
  77. "Candidate List Grouped by Contest" (PDF). Forsyth Board of Elections. April 22, 2020. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
  78. 1 2 3 4 5 "Petition Search". North Carolina Board of Elections. August 5, 2020. Retrieved August 19, 2020.
  79. Morril, Jim; Murphy, Brian (February 22, 2020). "'More successful than we could have imagined.' GOP group funds ads for Dem in NC race".
  80. Lavelle, Marianne (September 14, 2020). "Senate 2020: In Storm-Torn North Carolina, an Embattled Republican Tries a Climate-Friendly Image". InsideClimate News. Retrieved September 20, 2020.
  81. Murphy, Brian (September 14, 2020). "Cunningham says during US Senate debate he'd be 'hesitant' to take COVID-19 vaccine". www.charlotteobserver.com. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
  82. Murphy, Brian (September 22, 2020). "Cunningham, Tillis spar over filling Supreme Court vacancy, COVID-19 relief in debate". www.newsobserver.com. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
  83. "Article". www.newsobserver.com. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
  84. Specht, Paul (August 19, 2020). "No, Cunningham has not been 'silent' on defunding police". PolitiFact . Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  85. Specht, Paul (October 6, 2020). "Army Reserve investigating Cunningham after woman confirms affair, more texts emerge". WRAL.com. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  86. Kane, Paul (October 9, 2020). "Cunningham struggles to refocus N.C. Senate campaign after acknowledging extramarital relationship". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  87. Leslie, Laura (October 9, 2020). "Asked four times whether there are more affairs not yet known, Cunningham declined to say yes or no". WRAL.com. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  88. "Cal Cunningham dodges several questions during first news conference since sexting scandal". WSOC. October 9, 2020. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  89. Greenwood, Max (October 9, 2020). "Cunningham dodges questions about text message scandal". TheHill. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
  90. Edmondson, Catie (October 3, 2020). "Virus Diagnosis and Secret Texts Upend a Critical Senate Race in a Single Night". The New York Times. Retrieved October 4, 2020.
  91. Berman, Russell (October 3, 2020). "Suddenly, Amy Coney Barrett Might Not Have the Votes". The Atlantic .
  92. Silver, Nate (September 18, 2020). "Forecasting the race for the Senate". FiveThirtyEight . Retrieved September 18, 2020.
  93. "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. November 2, 2020. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  94. "2020 Senate Race Ratings". Daily Kos Elections. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  95. "2020 Senate Elections Model". Decision Desk HQ. September 2, 2020. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
  96. "2020 Senate Ratings". Senate Ratings. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  97. "2020 Senate race ratings". Sabato's Crystal Ball. Retrieved March 12, 2021.
  98. "Battle for the Senate 2020". RCP. October 23, 2020.
  99. "2020 Senate Race Ratings for October 29, 2020". The Cook Political Report. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  100. "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. November 19, 2019.
  101. "Defend Our GOP Senate Majority. Donate NOW". WinRed.
  102. 1 2 "The Voter's Self Defense System". Vote Smart.
  103. PAC, Huck. "Candidates – Huck PAC". www.huckpac.com. Archived from the original on June 11, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  104. "National Right To Life And NC Right To Life, Inc. Endorse Thom Tillis For US Senate". The Johnson County Report. November 4, 2019.
  105. "North Carolina Grades & Endorsements". nrapvf.org. NRA-PVF. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved February 15, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  106. "Republican Jewish Coalition". www.rjchq.org. Archived from the original on July 3, 2020.
  107. "Barack Obama wades into NC's 2020 elections with endorsements in key races". The News & Observer . August 3, 2020.
  108. 1 2 3 Cunningham, Cal (March 4, 2020). "North Carolina Democratic Congressional Delegation Endorses Cal Cunningham". Archived from the original on May 8, 2020. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  109. Schnieder, Elena (May 1, 2020). "Klobuchar launches campaign to aid Senate, House Dems in 2020". Politico.
  110. "Serve America PAC endorses six new federal candidates". Serve America PAC. March 11, 2020.
  111. Kinnard, Meg (May 21, 2020). "Stacey Abrams endorses candidates in 7 US Senate contests". Associated Press .
  112. Cunningham, Cal (March 5, 2020). "Cal Earns Additional North Carolina Endorsements Following Decisive Primary Victory". Archived from the original on May 8, 2020. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  113. "NC-Sen: Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D. IN) Helps Cal Cunningham (D) End Moscow Mitch's Reign Of Terror". Daily KOS. April 23, 2020.
  114. Merica, Dan (May 13, 2020). "Buttigieg highlights importance of local officials in first post-campaign endorsements". CNN . Retrieved May 14, 2020.
  115. "Bend the Arc Jewish Action PAC". Bend the Arc: Jewish Action.
  116. "Cal Cunningham – Black Economic Alliance PAC". Black Economic Alliance. Archived from the original on May 5, 2021. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  117. "2020 Endorsements" . Retrieved August 18, 2024.
  118. "Communications Workers Of America Local 3611 Endorse Cal Cunningham For His Commitment To Economic Justice". Calfornc. Archived from the original on September 16, 2020. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
  119. Muller, Tiffany (July 30, 2019). "End Citizens United Endorses Cal Cunningham for U.S. Senate". End Citizens United.
  120. "Equality North Carolina Releases Final Round Of 2020 Electoral Endorsements". Equality NC. April 23, 2020.
  121. "Everytown For Gun Safety Action Fund Endorses Cal Cunningham for U.S. Senate in North Carolina". Everytown. June 9, 2020.
  122. "2020 – Feminist Majority PAC". feministmajoritypac.org.
  123. "In Key Senate Races, Giffords Backs Challengers in Iowa and North Carolina Taking on NRA-Backed Incumbents". Giffords.
  124. "Human Rights Campaign Endorses 40 House, 5 Senate Pro-Equality Leaders". Human Rights Campaign. May 18, 2020.
  125. "Indivisible NC District 9". Indivisible NC District 9.
  126. "Meet the 2020 Candidates". Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs.[ permanent dead link ]
  127. "LCV Action Fund Endorses Cal Cunningham For Senate". July 31, 2019.
  128. "Former North Carolina State Senator and Candidate for U.S. Senate Earns Endorsement from Nation's Leading Pro-Choice Advocacy Group". replacementsltdpac. NARAL Pro-Choice America. March 5, 2020.
  129. "U.S. Senate – Education Votes". educationvotes.nea.org.
  130. "2020 Federal Endorsements – NOW PAC". nowpac.org.
  131. "Who We Support – Environmental Candidates". Natural Resources Defense Council.
  132. "NC Labor 2020 Voter Guide". July 22, 2020.
  133. "2020 Endorsements – Patriotic Millionaires". patrioticmillionaires.org.
  134. "Planned Parenthood Action Fund Endorses Cal Cunningham and Deborah Ross to Fight for North Carolinians in Congress". replacementsltdpac. Planned Parenthood Action.
  135. "Sierra Club Endorses Cal Cunningham". Calfornc. Archived from the original on May 8, 2020. Retrieved April 8, 2020.
  136. "North Carolina – Official UAW Endorsements". uawendorsements.org. United Automobile Workers.
  137. "Cal Cunningham for Senate". VoteVets.org. Archived from the original on October 1, 2020. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
  138. Bravender, Robin (April 26, 2020). "With first quarter fundraising surge, Cunningham outraises Tillis for the first time". ncpolicywatch.com. NC Policy Watch . Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  139. 270 to Win
  140. Real Clear Politics
  141. Change Research/CNBC
  142. Swayable Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  143. Ipsos/Reuters
  144. Data for Progress
  145. Frederick Polls
  146. Emerson College
  147. 1 2 Morning Consult
  148. CNN/SSRS Archived October 31, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  149. Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
  150. East Carolina University
  151. Cardinal Point Analytics (R)
  152. Marist College/NBC
  153. Gravis Marketing
  154. Public Policy Polling (D)
  155. Meeting Street Insights/Carolina Partnership for Reform (R) Archived October 31, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  156. Siena College/NYT Upshot
  157. Ipsos/Reuters
  158. RMG Research Archived November 1, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  159. Swayable
  160. SurveyUSA
  161. YouGov/UMass Lowell
  162. Harper Polling/Civitas (R)
  163. YouGov/CBS
  164. Trafalgar Group
  165. Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
  166. Citizen Data
  167. Ipsos/Reuters
  168. Meredith College
  169. Change Research/CNBC
  170. Data for Progress (D)
  171. East Carolina University
  172. ABC/Washington Post
  173. Emerson College
  174. Civiqs/Daily Kos
  175. Siena College/NYT Upshot
  176. Ipsos/Reuters
  177. Monmouth University
  178. SurveyUSA
  179. Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. (R)
  180. RMG Research Archived October 14, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  181. Morning Consult
  182. Ipsos/Reuters
  183. Public Policy Polling
  184. Data For Progress (D)
  185. Change Research/CNBC
  186. East Carolina University
  187. ALG Research (D)
  188. Hart Research Associates (D)
  189. YouGov/CBS
  190. YouGov/UMass Lowell
  191. Meredith College
  192. Change Research/CNBC
  193. Harper Polling/Civitas (R)
  194. Morning Consult
  195. Emerson College
  196. Morning Consult
  197. 1 2 Ipsos/Reuters
  198. 1 2 Siena College/NYT Upshot
  199. Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  200. Suffolk University
  201. SurveyUSA
  202. CNN/SSRS
  203. Kaiser Family Foundation/Cook Political Report
  204. The Trafalgar Group (R)
  205. Rasmussen Reports/Pulse Opinion Research
  206. Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group
  207. Change Research/CNBC
  208. Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  209. Monmouth University
  210. FOX News
  211. East Carolina University
  212. Change Research/CNBC
  213. Morning Consult
  214. Redfield and Wilton Strategies
  215. East Carolina University
  216. 1 2 Emerson College
  217. 1 2 Harper Polling/Civitas (R)
  218. Change Research/CNBC
  219. Public Policy Polling (D)
  220. Data for Progress
  221. YouGov/CBS
  222. HIT Strategies (D)
  223. Change Research/CNBC
  224. Morning Consult
  225. Cardinal Point Analytics (R) Archived July 30, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  226. Public Policy Polling
  227. Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  228. Marist College/NBC News
  229. Spry Strategies (R)
  230. Cardinal Point Analytics (R)
  231. Change Research/CNBC
  232. Public Policy Polling
  233. Change Research/CNBC
  234. East Carolina University
  235. Public Policy Polling
  236. FOX News
  237. NYT Upshot/Siena College
  238. Gravis Marketing (R)
  239. Redfield & Wilton Strategies
  240. Public Policy Polling
  241. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Harper Polling/Civitas (R)
  242. Meeting Street Insights (R) Archived June 5, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  243. East Carolina University
  244. Civiqs/Daily Kos (D)
  245. Meredith College
  246. SurveyUSA
  247. Public Policy Polling
  248. Harper Polling/Civitas (R) Archived April 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  249. East Carolina University
  250. Public Policy Polling
  251. Public Opinion Strategies (R)
  252. ALG Research (D)
  253. 1 2 Meredith College
  254. Public Policy Polling (D)
  255. 1 2 3 Fabrizio Ward
  256. Public Policy Polling
  257. Emerson College Archived June 4, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
  258. Public Policy Polling (D)
  259. Harper Polling/Civitas (R) Archived April 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
  260. Climate Nexus
  261. Millard, Drew (December 11, 2020). "How the Safe Bet Lost in North Carolina". The Nation. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  262. "State Composite Abstract Report – Contest.pdf" (PDF). North Carolina State Board of Elections. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
  263. "North Carolina Senate Election Results 2020". National Election Pool . NBC News. March 7, 2021. Retrieved March 30, 2022.
  264. "DRA 2020". Daves Redistricting. Retrieved August 18, 2024.

Further reading

Official campaign websites